The one decision I didn't understand was the straight drive into middle left side that El S played. Coll just got a let with no dispute. To me, that was easy stroke. Coll was right there.
Game ball was clearly good. Coll was dreaming if he thought that was down. Got to also say that the those two decisions that went against him seemed pretty rough.
The no let call at 17.20 is spot on. Close examination reveals there isn't actually any contact between the two players! Coll falls over as he is unbalanced.
Actually he played the ball, hence he accepted the interference. So what should be a decision if the ball wasnt down after accidental coll's shot? Coll could say that he won the point
Just so you have some feedback, I stopped watching after the 9 7 no let which is clearly a yes let. I mean what's the point of looking through video several times if you can't make a reasonable decision. Just pointless to watch further because I can't be bothered to care about the result.
Terrible reffing...in my opinion.. just as it was in Egypt when these two met....for some reason,shorbagy always gets the decision...then has a chat with the ref when it doesn't go he's way...!?
what are those commentators about? both decisions the VAR got them right. the first one was stroke because the ball was poor and the main difference between asal's and mohamed's left hand is that asal does it dirty and with intention and mo did it because he wanted to avoid slamming his face into paul's back. and the other no let decision was right because the shot was too good and mohamed was moving away from paul"s path and cleared the way to the ball
To come back from 4-0 down shows how resilient Elshorbagy is. Coll too passive in the 2nd half of that game.
That was a harsh stroke when your being pushed in with left hand. Not a great ball from Coll but he probably could have cleared.
Perfect showing of the crazy rules and why squash can’t get into the Olympics
Very well played by Elshorbagy
The one decision I didn't understand was the straight drive into middle left side that El S played. Coll just got a let with no dispute. To me, that was easy stroke. Coll was right there.
Game ball was clearly good. Coll was dreaming if he thought that was down. Got to also say that the those two decisions that went against him seemed pretty rough.
Coll fan, he was playing really smart, heady ball the first 5 points, then switched back to the just wear him down strategy. Just an observation.
The no let call at 17.20 is spot on. Close examination reveals there isn't actually any contact between the two players! Coll falls over as he is unbalanced.
Amazing game played by Shorbagy.
Played nearly perfect squash. Not spectacular but very very solid.
brutal reffing...
every point is hard work.
Why squash is not in the Olympics #2399
couple of those decisions went againt Coll, great game though
Fix your refereeing issues PSA - your ‘expert ‘ commentators can’t even agree on the calls MOST of the time - this is just a joke at this point now
Coll got his racket on that ball and still got a no let? That makes no sense...
Actually he played the ball, hence he accepted the interference.
So what should be a decision if the ball wasnt down after accidental coll's shot? Coll could say that he won the point
There was hardly any contact before he went down. You can't just fall down on your own and expect a let.
폴콜..ㅠㅠ
You get crazy referees in Egypt and the USA........goes with the territory I'm afraid.
after all these years, PSA finally purchased new audio equipment
Warum nicht das ganze Spiel...was soll das😒warum.... ?!
Arbitrage partiel
Mo is blocking😖
Just so you have some feedback, I stopped watching after the 9 7 no let which is clearly a yes let. I mean what's the point of looking through video several times if you can't make a reasonable decision. Just pointless to watch further because I can't be bothered to care about the result.
Terrible reffing...in my opinion.. just as it was in Egypt when these two met....for some reason,shorbagy always gets the decision...then has a chat with the ref when it doesn't go he's way...!?
what are those commentators about? both decisions the VAR got them right. the first one was stroke because the ball was poor and the main difference between asal's and mohamed's left hand is that asal does it dirty and with intention and mo did it because he wanted to avoid slamming his face into paul's back. and the other no let decision was right because the shot was too good and mohamed was moving away from paul"s path and cleared the way to the ball
Asal?
@@oliverkerr5620 yes. The commentators compared Asal to Mo
4:10 there was a direct line PJ should get some glasses and shut up sometimes