The British may have a smaller military nowerdays, but what they have man for man is some of the best trained soldiers in the world, I always see many American marines and soldiers praising how good and effective the British are. And they have some of the best weapons in the world I think they are ranked 7th in the world which is amazing considering how small the numbers are but as for lasers, submarines and many other things they are in line with the Americans. And are great allies they train together go to battle together and help each other out. That's what it's all about, The British SAS and SBS are the pioneers of elite and secretive special forces along with the SEALS and DELTA force. And there intelligence the MI5 and MI6 and probably have a more secret MI7, is on par with the NSA, CIA and DOD of the Americans. Brothers in arms :)
No evidence indicates that the British soldiers unit for unit are better then any other country, you literally just made that up. Also, Germany will be surpassing the UK by the end of this decade, meaning the UK will be 9-10th strongest in the world. Secondly, the technology Britain uses is not on par with America which is why China never copies Britain’s technology. And lastly, the MI5 and MI6 are in no way as powerful as the FBI and CIA, that has to be some kind of joke, the NSA and DOD and CIA all have way more resources and global power.
@@BenMiller739 Ok my friend you obviously no more than me. Even though it's well known throughout the top militaries how good the British are to this day, also I'm American myself and have family members that are currently in the military and older relative's that served years ago. And yes of course it's well known that the US has far more resources and reach than anyone in the world. The British and Americans share and use each other to gather information. And yes it's about time that Germany stepped up they should be in the top 5 militaries in the world already but have been far to passive. I will be happy to see Germany the most powerful nation in Europe rise up and create a strong European military that will help strengthen NATO. And as for China they copy anyone and everyone that they can including the Russians even though much of there equipment is at least 20years behind America. In fact considering China have a population of 1.3billion it amazes me that they rarely have any inventions and most not all of what they copy turns out to be a far poorer version.
@@samnigam3451 Respect to you and your country aswel my friend. I love the history of India and the fantastic beautiful ancient ruins and structures of India they were well ahead of there time and some of those ancient architectures are so precise that it would take a huge monumental effort to replicate even with today's modern machinery. Thank you and what a wonderful nation India has always been. Peace be with you :)
@@mattsavage9960 Give the Chinese some time. The US didn’t pass up the British for over a century. China has an obscene amount of potential, but so far they have chosen not to spend it on their military. The Chinese military reminds me of the US military at the turn of the 20th century. Just starting to flex their legs.
The thing about the Brits is that they turn up to a fight, on time, trained to the max, prepared and always punch above their weight. Quite simply, "the Brits do war" and have done so for centuries, mess with them at your peril.
The British are masters of war i dont think any other nation has more experience of war and defiantly winning the wars!. Look at the inventions that came from this small island Now imagine if they had land and money like America how powerful they would be! Crazy to think they run 2/3 of the world for 500 years! Respect and im happy we are allies.
Beam me up Scotty. Winning wars? Defeated in Crimea. Defeated by Stone Age Zulus. Defeated in American war of independence. Defeated in Europe and fled to Dunkirk for evacuation. Defeated in Singapore where 120,000 soldiers surrendered to a force on bicycles and a quarter of the size. Do you want some more?
@@hughbarr8408 Lost battles. Not lost wars. Besides the war of independence was Brit versus Brit. BTW It was the Russian empire which lost the Crimean war. Britain/France/Ottomans won that war. The Zulus won, I think two battles, the losses they suffered winning one of those battles all but guaranteed they were never going to win that war. The Zulus were slaughtered. The British slaughtered the Japanese in the battles for India and Burma forcing the Japanese into the longest retreat being killed the whole way, in their long military history. Yep we ran away at Dunkirk to fight another place on another day. Didn't take us long to get back into first Sicily/Italy and then France though eh!? No lost wars there. Any thing else you want to show your ignorance over?
@@hughbarr8408 'Defeated in Europe and fled to Dunkirk' yeah..... and then what happened... quite a big part of that war you're missing out (intentionally)...
I don’t know, you tell me please and I expect you will say something along the lines that “we won WW2”. The truth is rather different. The Russians played a huge part in WW2 and so did the Americans. Britain lost everything and truth be told , even France came out of WW2 with more of an Empire intact. It was a disaster for Britain. Please don’t take my word for it because Churchill says it better than me. Wars that built the British Empire destroyed the British Empire. This is what happens to all Empires. War elevated America to the new world leader and it will destroy America too. Hugh
@@hughbarr8408and compare that to how many fights we've won and those losses soon become insignificant and as everyone has already said USA was technically British Vs British there isn't a thing called an American technically they're British
Never underestimate the British they are some of best fighters in the world they showed the germans in ww2 they may have a small military but they can pack a mighty punch to any fool who tries missing with them
The British are more powerful than what they are rated????? If u recently look at the Russian and Ukrainian war, Russia was highly rated but are taking a beating from a smaller military nation like Ukraine, British are highly trained soldiers, technology super advanced weapons, but never boast like other nations do, and also the UK are also nuclear armed missiles what people automatically forget, every one thinks it's only USA Russia China with these weapons only!!!!!!!!!!!!
What the UK needs is a government what properly supports the troops. Our troop numbers are seriously low and the likes of Russia are fully aware of that as we enter a 2nd Cold War.
I’m less worried about the amount of troops more so the development of tech, I’m truly scared a lot of this stuff will be cancelled last minute despite the outstanding potential. It’s happens quite a bit in the past, like with the tsr2
@@niweshlekhak9646 Well, US was similarly ahead of UK and everyone else when they rolled out the first 5th gen fighter (F-22). USA will always be ahead of UK in most military technologies in this era. Not a surprise, really. They might be a bit behind in the actual fielding of some capabilities, but as the Cold War 2.0 heats up, even that is unlikely to be the case.
UK military is small but is infact the only military to win a war on there own in last 50 years when they fought against Argentina a much bigger rival All other wars have had multiple countries in inlvolved one thing Brits are good at is inventions thou
I just hope our government continues to invest while they can, it costs less to maintain and operate the equipment after it’s been bought, and is better to have it and not need it then to need it and not have it. my personal hope is that the raf does expand to having up to 120 of those tempest fighters, with potentially another aircraft supplementing them on a 1:1 basis. For the navy I hope they continue to build more ships, costly sure, but considering how long it takes to build and how effective they are when actually around, it’d be better to just invest. Build 8 initial type 26 w potential for another batch of maybe 2-4 alongside the really cheap but seemingly promising type 31’s. army I just hope they become less strict w their selection process and build an active force that’s more than 100k at least, w decent armour and ifv support etc
Our numbers might be small but in a real threat to the homeland all out war scenario those numbers would jump up real fast, Britain in peace and Britain on a full war footing are to completely different entities
We British and our allies the USA, Commonwealth and nato will continue to advance our military presence and fear no potential treat. We will keep our people children and nations safe. By having the most advanced equipment at our disposal. God bless Ukraine.
Britain first, Anglo commonwealth and America second the remainder of the commonwealth third. Eastern Europe, the Baltic and Scandinavia fourth! EU, China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba, South Africa, Argentina and Brazil last!
The US are not our allie. We are just their poodle ,if we don't do what they say, we get slapped down ,it all right when nato fights an inferior army look how great we are but when we go again a army of equal strength we don't do so great,it ok because its only Ukrainian soldier's getting massacred this war should have been settled over a year ago
Clueless people will underestimate the British which would be a big mistake Britain has been doing this type of stuff for years and well advance than most countries in this type of work as for being ranked Britain is in the top three and the fact we stand with America makes it frightning combo Britain has the best trained military and add that to the well trained military and size of the American military again is a frightening combo and that brotherhood will never be broken now I would like to see ukraine join the E. U which will be a great addition
We couldn't punch anything.because the governments for years have made the UK armed forces a joke.thats why we should keep our noses out of other countries business.because we are ill equipped to do anything.
They forgot the new military uniform that will go with the new energy weapons, the Imperial storm trooper armor of course... will go fantastically with the stealth imperial spy ship that looks like its straight out of SWTOR.
The 50 KW Dragon Fire Laser is being upgraded to a 150KW production model .. thats why the New Type 26 frigate Type 45 Destroyer and future type 83 Destroyer is being fitted with extra Generators to produce the power needed... Each Laser shot on incoming drones missiles and Aircraft costs roughly £10 instead of Hundreds of thousands of pounds for missiles to hit those targets ..the other benefit is no extra missiles will need to be carried on deployment othet than the standard amount and 3rd there is no extra risk in having extra stored missiles onboard....
This has to worth investigating. Even if it all turns out to be less than useful, we have to continue to look for ever cheaper methods. If it works we might get orders for it if it doesn't well at least we know it isn't going to work and can put research money elsewhere. Learning money is never money wasted.
I know we are increasing our budget for spending and we have a couple new types of frigates that will be crazy we already have the 2 new aircraft carriers and those new subs will make a big difference this war in Ukraine has proven we need to keep our defence spending up
The world is war crazy, we need to invest in more highly trained troops using modern weapons asap , lets not fall asleep on watch like our politicians like to do.
İngilizlerin hayal ettikleri bu listenin çoğunu TÜRKİYE bugün üretti, deniyor ve hatta kullanıyor. 😊 Allah'a şükür. Mühendislerimizin emeklerine sağlık.
the nuclear submarines are the dreadnought class spoken about in this video? ik there is another smaller sub being built but surely your talking about the dreadnought?
A while ago a high ranking Russian reluctantly admitted that the Brits have the best light infantry on the planet, the SAS and SBS are among, if not the best Special Forces, The Vanguards give others cause for concern, sea viper kills every and all incoming target, the Russian's are terrified of Storm Shadow, Nlaw's helped stop Russian Tanks, Brit forces train many other nations and even though they don't have F16's are actively involved training Ukrainian pilots to fly them, The Royal Navy is unmatched by any other navy in the last 200+ years, the RAF wiped the floor with the Luftwaffe, and the current RAF flies Typhoons and F35's which given how RAF pilots are trained etc are a match for US F22's. The Brits retook the falklands, 8000 miles away,, against a bigger force in it's backyard. Vulcan bombers successfully tested and beat US air defence in the 60's, TWICE. The only thing the Brit Forces fear are it's own blinkered government. Take ANY brit private and put him up against your normal typical Conscripted Russian and see who wins.
Does the UK have the same issue of inflated expenses and cost overrun that the United States Industrial complex seems to have? Leaching our economy dry. It is not that we do not spend enough on our Military. It is though we do not get our money's worth for what our Military really needs. Ford Class CVN, the F-35, and the various failed Destroyer programs. Perhaps we should work together in a restructured alliance to replace NATO. I don't hear the British complaining about there defence spending level.
Yes, those of us with a view we need to be able to punch our weight defensively have grave concerns about defence spend levels and the amount of wasted in the procurement system. There is all growing disquiet in our dealings with the US for defence purposes. Is the US a reliable defence partner - nope! Will the US administration throw UK (and/or Europe) under the bus the moment it suits their purpose - Yep! The unholy mess caused by the sociopath AKA Orangeutang at a time crucial for the survival of a European democracy (Ukraine) should be a message to all Europeans - no matter the cost, Europe must take care of Europe and buy European equipment which needs no permissions/strings attached from US corporate needs or Governmental interferences. We should treat the US armed forces as a friend and made to feel welcome if they turn up but always, always, always have another option to fill those gaps the US will leave when their (excellent and well maintained and trained) forces do an about turn because of the sort of politican infighting bullshit which has so damaged poor little Ukraine. We must never again put any sort of reliance on the USA here in Europe. For a decade or two it will seem insurmountable we can replace what the US has (theoretically at least) brought to NATO but replace them we must. Better to have no friend than a friend which cannot be trusted. BTW - I am not anti-American. Quite the opposite. My wife is American (Ex-USAF) so half of my family is American and lives there. I am merely a pragmatist and thus am absolutely distrustful of any US governmental decision to assist, support any situation my country is likely to find themselves in, the moment it proves to be no longer profitable or helpful to the US.
It's my understanding that is still just at the conceptual stage and may or may not be viable. All of these things listed here are at various stages of testing or production.
They can be bought off the shelf from a great many smaller producers. Watch what comes from the Ukrainian drone factories about a year from now - I'm guessing they will head the world in cheap drone manufacturing. There is one British drone which is still in development however, started its life as a Turkish design. Not sure if it will ever be accepted into service or even pushed for mass production but there was a lot of noise about 18 months ago about it and it's gone quiet since. I think it was being called Jackal but I might be mixing that up with something else.
@Kermit Idiothunter Actually the UK is the 7th largest arms exporter in the world however it mainly sells arms to under developed nations, the only thing wrong is your source of statistics 😂by the way the UK has one of the overall worst public transport systems in Europe, that is pretty poor when you consider that there are 44 countries in Europe and more then half have a lower gdp. speaking of stats, I should charge you for the next lesson
@Kermit Idiothunter If you re read my last comment I did not say third world countries I said under developed countries. I consider Saudi Arabia an under developed nation as even though it is a very wealthy country it's laws on equality and the treatment of women are very archaic. To answer your first question there were 2.5 billion journeys on public transport made in the UK last year so I would say that millions of people rely on it regularly. I agree with you that the standards on busses, metros, trains and even public roads are substandard in Britain and so is the service by many of the drivers and transport staff. But let’s be completely honest they are over worked and underpaid as are many of the sectors in the UK. This is the governments fault as they continually mismanage the country and undermine its natural resources to the extent of negligence. For example the Prime minister has declared today that he will make it mandatory for people in England to study math until the age of 18 years old, this is unenforceable as the education systems curriculum in England can only instruct mandatory learning until the age of 16 years old. This shows the incompetence from the government and the prime minister from a high level. This lesson is £1.50 as mentioned before I will be charging, I hope that you had an enjoyable evening. I leave you with these words from Albert Einstein - We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. 😊
god you people are so boring and stupid - these same comments on every video about the British army (or anything really) you do realise that your local council budget and the entire fucking defence budget might be slightly different?
Or if he wins, will he inadvertently liberate Europe from NATO, and force them to decide strategic affairs for themselves again? LOL. Suddenly the EU manages to get that combined armed force they always talk about but never do? Suddenly the UK stops acting as if the Americans colonized them? Brilliant! Like most Canadians, I hate the demented clown, the Emperor of Morons, but even a broken clock can be right right twice a day.
He will either win or he will lose. If he wins he will either remain or go solo. Who cares? There will be a huge gap in the NATO defence shield to fill but Europe can and must continue to strengthen as if the US is no longer there. That they can and have played such horrendous games with Ukraine and by association the security of Europe with their political infighting bullshit has amply demonstrated we should merely treat them as a welcome friend if they turn up and continue to act as though they are no longer interested. Either way NATO will continue no matter what it may be called in the future. Put your hand in a bucket of sand, withdraw it, how long did the ripples last? European defence is in the hands of Europe not the US - they can no longer be trusted and WILL throw Europe under the bus if it suits their purpose. It's taken a sociopathic madman like the Orangeutang to make Europe wake up to the fact we CANNOT and SHOULD NOT put our faith in anyone other than Europe to defend Europe.
Tempest is now a joint programme with Japan and Italy for a 6th Gen fighter. We did a tech demonstrator in the 90's. That's how we become a tier 1 partner on F-35.. we proved we had the stealth knowledge to the Yanks. The UK will never make a jet fighter again on it's own sadly.
@@36thulsterdiv72I prefer it this way, before when we made our own stuff there was a huge problem…. It’d typically be cancelled last second At least with other backers that’s not an option
What do you want me to say? To define the primary role of our Navy which is to protect our shores from invasion? The Royal Navy and its ships are MIA, if they were doing what they should then we would not have the influx of rubber dinghy’s arriving on our shores (escorted by the RNLI). So you tell me if I am wrong please, better still, explain in your own words what you don’t get about my reply? On you go.
@@hughbarr8408 On you go!!!!??? Challenge accepted and stupid comment very easily swatted aside. The Royal Navy has its orders and its responsibilities issued to it through the government. If the government does not task the RN then the RN will not be in a position to have an affect one way or the other. That's what the Border Force is for - if you don't like the way they are being employed (and I most certainly do not either) then your avenue of complaint should be through them or through you local MP. The Royal Navy and RAF joint operations offer the protection they are tasked with which is why there are no bad actors causing us harm/damage. Any other logic you need help with?
Some of them are already in use in Ukraine and supplied by the British government to them for trials, operation testing and even in operational use. Martel for example has been used for a couple of years now I believe even if in very restricted numbers.
Very interesting. India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:- 10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite) 9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI. 8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to. 7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class). 6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile). 5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing) 4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability. 3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing) 2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order) 1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
I'm Indian, but the truth is india like China use cheap materials and most of the vast number of military still use world war2 weapon's, also look at Indias defense budget compared to the UK that will answer everyones questions and answers????????
@@siisaac9951 Your assertions are garbage. Let me explain why:- 1.) _"Indians use cheap materials"_ What basis do you have for this assertion? I take this accusation very seriously because this is my professional area of expertise. Judging by your comment you are absolutely clueless about Indian materials. Do you know what steel is used for Indian submarines? It is DMR292A, a special grade developed in India and now manufactured at Rourkela, India. It has a yield strength of between 700 and 1000 MPa. This is in the same class as the HY-100 and HY-130 steels (690 and 900 MPa respectively) that started being used in the American Nuclear Submarines relatively recently from the Seawolf class onwards. Meanwhile, where is UK? It does make superior submarines but the steel for them is not even made in the UK (as per Viscount Younger of Leckie who asked this question in the House of Commons at 2:30 pm on 30 November 2021). Let me give you another example: The Low-Nickel High-Nitrogen Steel used in manufacturing of the hull of the Arjun Mk1A tank has superior ballistic performance and lower weight compared to the RHA steel on Challenger 2 tank. (Even though I agree that the Arjun Mk1A is inferior to the Challenger 2, the aforementioned fact on materials remains true i.e. Indian material used is better). Just because one entity (OFB) in entire Indian military industry has had the history of shoddy manufacturing does not mean entire Indian manufacturing sector is like that. 2.) _"Indian military still uses vast amounts of WW2 weaponry"_ . One can argue that slow modernization has led to large quantities of almost obsolete equipment, to call it WW2 equipment is patently false. The only three pieces of WW2 equipment Indian Army still uses are: Sterling Carbine, Bren LMG and Browning M2. Apart from these absolutely NO piece of equipment is of WW2 vintage. I dare you to name a SINGLE such weapon other than ones I listed. Now Sterling and Bren are being withdrawn but Browning M2 is timeless, even the Americans use that WW1 vintage. 3.) _"Look at UK military budget and Indian military budget"_ . Ok, let us do that:- Indian Military budget: $76.6 Billion UK Military budget: $68.4 Billion ^Figures for 2021 from SPIRI 2022 report. Indian Military Capital Expenditure (2023): $20 Billion UK Military Capital Expenditure (2021): $17.7 Billion ^Sources are respective govt. budget documents. Largely comparable figures. But I know your assertion is that Indian military is so much larger, right? So Indian military gets less bang for buck, right? WRONG! Example:- Cost of 500 km of High Speed Rail in both nations being constructed at roughly the same timeframe:- HS2 (UK): $100-140 Billion Mumbai Shinkansen (India): $21 Billion Why such a massive difference? Because you were comparing nominal figures like a m0r0n instead of accounting for cost of living, etc as done by PPP figures. Everything costs more in UK. And their procurement is just as wasteful (Ajax anyone?). *Get out of your pathetic inferiority complex.* I am not saying that UK has no advantages or no things where we can learn lessons from them. But to worship them because of your own inferiority complex to the point that you level such baseless accusations as "poor material" on Indian weapons is simply pathetic and factually wrong.
@@dadsnotcharlies7686 Oh yeah? List some then. I mean, sure, maybe a few projects. But "most"? As always, the British penchant for tall claims and taking credit for others' work is alive and well.
India is advancing fast but still far behind in developing their own weapons. Mainly aircraft, the only jet India has ever built is the HAL tejas which rely on a cheap American engine and wouldn't pose any threat to most other fighter jets around the world, even chinese ones. India does excel over the UK is some areas such as their space program, but when it comes to building and designing airctaftcarriers, submarines and aircraft the UK still exceed India
My pics are BAE Tempest 6th gen stealth jet fighter, Directed high energy weapon, Martlet Air to surface missile, Perseus Cruise missile and UCAV Taranis. Hello from India 🇮🇳. Dear Buzz Please 🙏 make video on future weapons of India.
No need to bug this poor channel owner. Let me tell you: India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:- 10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite) 9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI. 8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to. 7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class). 6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile). 5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing) 4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability. 3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing) 2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order) 1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
@@death_parade just listing things that are similar to what the brits have does not make you as technically advanced as them. india buys cheap products from russia that are not even comparable to what the UK and other western countries are developing. Do you really think that your subs are comparable to vanguard class subs when even the US admits that the UK is the best manufacture of stealth subs. The HAL AMCA Mk2 is a fifth gen fighter and tempest will be a 6-th gen fighter. The problem with using scamjets to get over mach 5 is that communicating with the missile becomes almost impossible (due to plasma generated), its not manuverable due to its high speed and its not stealth because of its high heat signature. Due to peacetime, the idea is that most of the money goes onto R&D and not into the army - focusing on highly skilled teams like the SAS and SBS. This is the problem india has, they need to spend alot on their big army because they aren't really at peacetime at the moment so less money can be spent on R&D. Also, the UK armed forces have alot more experience in combat than india.
We won’t even pay for replacement tanks so this is all just a wish list. Or we’ll actually follow through with it all but end up with 1 off each which is always in for refit after it inevitably breaks down. Our government is disgraceful but as for the military itself I’m fully behind them
You gotta love the information & collation, but the delivery of ‘facts’ 🤥 any actual context at all, the blatant missing out of any development partners in the East..🤔 coupled with the supercilious way it’s presented is agonising 😩😂
As you requested, here is the Indian version: India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:- 10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite) 9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI. 8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to. 7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class). 6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile). 5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing) 4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability. 3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing) 2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order) 1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:- 10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite) 9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI. 8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to. 7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class). 6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile). 5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing) 4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability. 3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing) 2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order) 1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
Let me give you the answer. India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:- 10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite) 9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI. 8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to. 7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class). 6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile). 5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing) 4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability. 3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing) 2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order) 1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
@@death_parade If and when India is producing weapons systems of the same standard as other companies are offering the British government will beat a path to their doors either for collaborational purposes, to produce under licence or maybe even straightforward purchasing. Another factor which may (and rightfully should) influence any British connection with India will be the Indian connection with Russia. India, scientifically and industrially is a future player for sure but........... a trusted player? - the jury will have to remain out on that for a while yet.
@@Scaleyback317 Who said anything about British connection with India? India neither wants nor needs British vote of confidence on India's weapons industry. Only somebody totally clueless would believe that arms purchases are about buying the best quality, we all know how geopolitics is more important. UK is too deep into US orbit to even consider buying from India. As for being a "trusted player," again, India is not looking to be some sort of a "trusted player" of the West. Because by default that involves bending over backwards to placate the Americans. And India has already refused that offer multiple times. India stands alone. We are not averse to collaborations with the West or alignment on common interests (like containing China), but that can not and will not come at the cost of India's sovereign authority. Reason I pointed out that list is because Western arms have for long been considered the "top of the line" in India. And the fact that India's own technology is catching up and even surpassing the technology of its colonizers in some areas is a deeply reassuring and satisfying fact for Indians: tells us that we are on the right track and that our dreams of being a truly independent nation are slowly coming true. At the same time, it also reminds us that a ship load of work still remains for us to be able to close that gap in technologies such as submarines, jet engines, etc.
Well considering a nuclear power has launched a land war in Europe.. Do you propose throwing gravy chips at Putin as an act of aggression, instead of bringing the British military back upto a state of readiness to protect UK interests?
Inglaterra não consegui manter um governo por mais de 45 dias e com uma população que empobrece rapidamente. Pensa em dominação Mundial ainda. Seria risível se não fosse trágico! Gosto desse canal, dei Likes!
We know who are our friends & if you ain’t one of them you are a potential enemy. We do not actively seek conflict but we will deal with any threat firmly & if necessary fatally. 🇬🇧
@@henrycollins7680 I think you are overlooking the money the U.K. spends on weapons R&D and our armed forces proven history of doing more with less, but there is no convincing you I am sure. So we will agree to disagree.
@@colinpearce5856 nope , seen the weapons seen the performance , over rated min 2 gen behind , but really, any weapon used is lethal regardless where it comes from
don't overdo praising the British, the current UK army is weak and has little equipment, there are few soldiers, the country is heading for a civil war and the British should deal with that first because they brought millions of Muslim immigrants and other Africans to the country who rape, steal and kill without any consequences. Great Britain is not as good as the US and China, just look at the production in these countries, the number of planes, missiles, ammunition, etc.
We do our best and will find other sources for what we cannot provide ourselves. Did you listen to the breakdown of Skysabre sources for the finished article for example?
Global combat ship??? Hahaha this Is Lobbys Commonwealth ship, with mini missile camm, anti sub from thales, Toy gun shot peas bofors since great war, and derivate from 40mm, 2 x 3 launch torpedo, ancient sting ray, no dual band radar helo ancient lynx. this Is 2 classe ship ha ha ha. I am Sorry for not speak One english barbar language, but i speak Romance language 😂💙🎇
Procurement in the uk is a laugh every one of these here.nobody will see for a least twenty years or more.then when they are ready.they will be obsolete.because the uk mod is a f_____ joke
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
The British may have a smaller military nowerdays, but what they have man for man is some of the best trained soldiers in the world, I always see many American marines and soldiers praising how good and effective the British are. And they have some of the best weapons in the world I think they are ranked 7th in the world which is amazing considering how small the numbers are but as for lasers, submarines and many other things they are in line with the Americans. And are great allies they train together go to battle together and help each other out. That's what it's all about, The British SAS and SBS are the pioneers of elite and secretive special forces along with the SEALS and DELTA force. And there intelligence the MI5 and MI6 and probably have a more secret MI7, is on par with the NSA, CIA and DOD of the Americans. Brothers in arms :)
No evidence indicates that the British soldiers unit for unit are better then any other country, you literally just made that up. Also, Germany will be surpassing the UK by the end of this decade, meaning the UK will be 9-10th strongest in the world. Secondly, the technology Britain uses is not on par with America which is why China never copies Britain’s technology. And lastly, the MI5 and MI6 are in no way as powerful as the FBI and CIA, that has to be some kind of joke, the NSA and DOD and CIA all have way more resources and global power.
Pretty impressive. Respects from Sam India 🇮🇳
@@BenMiller739 Ok my friend you obviously no more than me. Even though it's well known throughout the top militaries how good the British are to this day, also I'm American myself and have family members that are currently in the military and older relative's that served years ago. And yes of course it's well known that the US has far more resources and reach than anyone in the world. The British and Americans share and use each other to gather information. And yes it's about time that Germany stepped up they should be in the top 5 militaries in the world already but have been far to passive. I will be happy to see Germany the most powerful nation in Europe rise up and create a strong European military that will help strengthen NATO.
And as for China they copy anyone and everyone that they can including the Russians even though much of there equipment is at least 20years behind America.
In fact considering China have a population of 1.3billion it amazes me that they rarely have any inventions and most not all of what they copy turns out to be a far poorer version.
@@samnigam3451 Respect to you and your country aswel my friend.
I love the history of India and the fantastic beautiful ancient ruins and structures of India they were well ahead of there time and some of those ancient architectures are so precise that it would take a huge monumental effort to replicate even with today's modern machinery.
Thank you and what a wonderful nation India has always been. Peace be with you :)
@@mattsavage9960 Give the Chinese some time. The US didn’t pass up the British for over a century. China has an obscene amount of potential, but so far they have chosen not to spend it on their military. The Chinese military reminds me of the US military at the turn of the 20th century. Just starting to flex their legs.
The thing about the Brits is that they turn up to a fight, on time, trained to the max, prepared and always punch above their weight. Quite simply, "the Brits do war" and have done so for centuries, mess with them at your peril.
The British are masters of war i dont think any other nation has more experience of war and defiantly winning the wars!. Look at the inventions that came from this small island Now imagine if they had land and money like America how powerful they would be! Crazy to think they run 2/3 of the world for 500 years! Respect and im happy we are allies.
Beam me up Scotty. Winning wars? Defeated in Crimea. Defeated by Stone Age Zulus. Defeated in American war of independence. Defeated in Europe and fled to Dunkirk for evacuation. Defeated in Singapore where 120,000 soldiers surrendered to a force on bicycles and a quarter of the size. Do you want some more?
@@hughbarr8408 Lost battles. Not lost wars. Besides the war of independence was Brit versus Brit. BTW It was the Russian empire which lost the Crimean war. Britain/France/Ottomans won that war. The Zulus won, I think two battles, the losses they suffered winning one of those battles all but guaranteed they were never going to win that war. The Zulus were slaughtered. The British slaughtered the Japanese in the battles for India and Burma forcing the Japanese into the longest retreat being killed the whole way, in their long military history. Yep we ran away at Dunkirk to fight another place on another day. Didn't take us long to get back into first Sicily/Italy and then France though eh!?
No lost wars there.
Any thing else you want to show your ignorance over?
@@hughbarr8408 'Defeated in Europe and fled to Dunkirk' yeah..... and then what happened... quite a big part of that war you're missing out (intentionally)...
I don’t know, you tell me please and I expect you will say something along the lines that “we won WW2”. The truth is rather different. The Russians played a huge part in WW2 and so did the Americans. Britain lost everything and truth be told , even France came out of WW2 with more of an Empire intact. It was a disaster for Britain. Please don’t take my word for it because Churchill says it better than me. Wars that built the British Empire destroyed the British Empire. This is what happens to all Empires. War elevated America to the new world leader and it will destroy America too. Hugh
@@hughbarr8408and compare that to how many fights we've won and those losses soon become insignificant and as everyone has already said USA was technically British Vs British there isn't a thing called an American technically they're British
Never underestimate the British they are some of best fighters in the world they showed the germans in ww2 they may have a small military but they can pack a mighty punch to any fool who tries missing with them
A military getting smaller every year.
Bruh. WW2 British Empire still existed.
@Ministry Of Holiness WW2 was more then 70 years ago and the situation and Geopolitical place of UK is different from WW2.
@@rogueriderhood1862 can't see a single compliment about Britain/UK without some doomer gloomer boomer having a little pissing on the parade party
Broo new UK armed forces update looks dope
Nice to see the UK strengthening their military. America and Uk will continue to stand strong together.
Wait until you see even one of these projects come to fruition before any sort of celebration.
TSR2 comes to mind !
The British are more powerful than what they are rated????? If u recently look at the Russian and Ukrainian war, Russia was highly rated but are taking a beating from a smaller military nation like Ukraine, British are highly trained soldiers, technology super advanced weapons, but never boast like other nations do, and also the UK are also nuclear armed missiles what people automatically forget, every one thinks it's only USA Russia China with these weapons only!!!!!!!!!!!!
France has nukes too
@@ohnoitsyoco1720so do india Pakistán Isreal north Korea and soon come Iran
What the UK needs is a government what properly supports the troops. Our troop numbers are seriously low and the likes of Russia are fully aware of that as we enter a 2nd Cold War.
I’m less worried about the amount of troops more so the development of tech, I’m truly scared a lot of this stuff will be cancelled last minute despite the outstanding potential. It’s happens quite a bit in the past, like with the tsr2
@@GrundleLongDong Ajax seems like it'll be particularly painful.
@@death_parade oh very much so, lord knows it’s been an absolute shitshow
@@death_parade US is already testing how it's 6th gen plane will fit in it's carriers, UK is well behind in everything.
@@niweshlekhak9646 Well, US was similarly ahead of UK and everyone else when they rolled out the first 5th gen fighter (F-22). USA will always be ahead of UK in most military technologies in this era. Not a surprise, really. They might be a bit behind in the actual fielding of some capabilities, but as the Cold War 2.0 heats up, even that is unlikely to be the case.
Type 83 destroyer, concept, probably be anti hypersonic defence, new propulsion systems
The Tempest there is other countries involved like Japan and Italy and maybe Sweden. We have all built Jets before.
Their stealth aircraft looks similar to the Russian Fire Fox Jet from that old Clint Eastwood Movie Fire Fox.
UK military is small but is infact the only military to win a war on there own in last 50 years when they fought against Argentina a much bigger rival
All other wars have had multiple countries in inlvolved one thing Brits are good at is inventions thou
This is true. Delta Force was modeled after the British SAS. England or Great Britain definantly punches above its weight.
I just hope our government continues to invest while they can, it costs less to maintain and operate the equipment after it’s been bought, and is better to have it and not need it then to need it and not have it.
my personal hope is that the raf does expand to having up to 120 of those tempest fighters, with potentially another aircraft supplementing them on a 1:1 basis.
For the navy I hope they continue to build more ships, costly sure, but considering how long it takes to build and how effective they are when actually around, it’d be better to just invest. Build 8 initial type 26 w potential for another batch of maybe 2-4 alongside the really cheap but seemingly promising type 31’s.
army I just hope they become less strict w their selection process and build an active force that’s more than 100k at least, w decent armour and ifv support etc
Thanks!
Our numbers might be small but in a real threat to the homeland all out war scenario those numbers would jump up real fast, Britain in peace and Britain on a full war footing are to completely different entities
We British and our allies the USA, Commonwealth and nato will continue to advance our military presence and fear no potential treat. We will keep our people children and nations safe. By having the most advanced equipment at our disposal. God bless Ukraine.
Britain first, Anglo commonwealth and America second the remainder of the commonwealth third. Eastern Europe, the Baltic and Scandinavia fourth!
EU, China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba, South Africa, Argentina and Brazil last!
The US are not our allie. We are just their poodle ,if we don't do what they say, we get slapped down ,it all right when nato fights an inferior army look how great we are but when we go again a army of equal strength we don't do so great,it ok because its only Ukrainian soldier's getting massacred this war should have been settled over a year ago
Very interesting Report, thank you.
What happened to the Japanese, are they moved away from the 6th gen Fighter program?
No the Japanese are working closely with the UK and Italians on the Tempest 6th Gen fighter jet and it looks cool AF.🇬🇧👍
Clueless people will underestimate the British which would be a big mistake Britain has been doing this type of stuff for years and well advance than most countries in this type of work as for being ranked Britain is in the top three and the fact we stand with America makes it frightning combo Britain has the best trained military and add that to the well trained military and size of the American military again is a frightening combo and that brotherhood will never be broken now I would like to see ukraine join the E. U which will be a great addition
Type 26 frigate will be world leading 👍👍👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Such a tiny country with such a heavy accurate punch...like the Mike Tyson of military
We couldn't punch anything.because the governments for years have made the UK armed forces a joke.thats why we should keep our noses out of other countries business.because we are ill equipped to do anything.
Lennox Lewis.
They forgot the new military uniform that will go with the new energy weapons, the Imperial storm trooper armor of course... will go fantastically with the stealth imperial spy ship that looks like its straight out of SWTOR.
The 50 KW Dragon Fire Laser is being upgraded to a 150KW production model .. thats why the New Type 26 frigate Type 45 Destroyer and future type 83 Destroyer is being fitted with extra Generators to produce the power needed... Each Laser shot on incoming drones missiles and Aircraft costs roughly £10 instead of Hundreds of thousands of pounds for missiles to hit those targets ..the other benefit is no extra missiles will need to be carried on deployment othet than the standard amount and 3rd there is no extra risk in having extra stored missiles onboard....
Waiting for some cook to invent lasered lamb chops......
@@normanmadden lasered food has been a 'thing' for a while now
This has to worth investigating. Even if it all turns out to be less than useful, we have to continue to look for ever cheaper methods. If it works we might get orders for it if it doesn't well at least we know it isn't going to work and can put research money elsewhere. Learning money is never money wasted.
Strange but winning way is to wait until it's almost to late then win by almost divine guidance (mostly works )
I know we are increasing our budget for spending and we have a couple new types of frigates that will be crazy we already have the 2 new aircraft carriers and those new subs will make a big difference this war in Ukraine has proven we need to keep our defence spending up
The world is war crazy, we need to invest in more highly trained troops using modern weapons asap , lets not fall asleep on watch like our politicians like to do.
I'm guessing Challenger 3 will be on your next list
Already in production isn't it?
İngilizlerin hayal ettikleri bu listenin çoğunu TÜRKİYE bugün üretti, deniyor ve hatta kullanıyor. 😊 Allah'a şükür. Mühendislerimizin emeklerine sağlık.
Sure thing, keep believing that...
What a crock of Turknat bullshit!
They have missed the massive type 83 Destroyer and the New a nuclear stealth submarine
the nuclear submarines are the dreadnought class spoken about in this video? ik there is another smaller sub being built but surely your talking about the dreadnought?
Next video:upcoming weapons of Buzz
A while ago a high ranking Russian reluctantly admitted that the Brits have the best light infantry on the planet, the SAS and SBS are among, if not the best Special Forces, The Vanguards give others cause for concern, sea viper kills every and all incoming target, the Russian's are terrified of Storm Shadow, Nlaw's helped stop Russian Tanks, Brit forces train many other nations and even though they don't have F16's are actively involved training Ukrainian pilots to fly them, The Royal Navy is unmatched by any other navy in the last 200+ years, the RAF wiped the floor with the Luftwaffe, and the current RAF flies Typhoons and F35's which given how RAF pilots are trained etc are a match for US F22's. The Brits retook the falklands, 8000 miles away,, against a bigger force in it's backyard. Vulcan bombers successfully tested and beat US air defence in the 60's, TWICE. The only thing the Brit Forces fear are it's own blinkered government. Take ANY brit private and put him up against your normal typical Conscripted Russian and see who wins.
Sorry but the latest MOD budget review has cut this list down to only 6 upcoming weapons of the UK. Ultimately it will be cut down to 4.
YOUVE FORGOT THE LONGE RANGE STAND OFF EMP MUNITION WHICH IS FIRED FROM A UNMANNED DRONE
Does the UK have the same issue of inflated expenses and cost overrun that the United States Industrial complex seems to have? Leaching our economy dry. It is not that we do not spend enough on our Military. It is though we do not get our money's worth for what our Military really needs. Ford Class CVN, the F-35, and the various failed Destroyer programs. Perhaps we should work together in a restructured alliance to replace NATO. I don't hear the British complaining about there defence spending level.
Yes, those of us with a view we need to be able to punch our weight defensively have grave concerns about defence spend levels and the amount of wasted in the procurement system.
There is all growing disquiet in our dealings with the US for defence purposes. Is the US a reliable defence partner - nope! Will the US administration throw UK (and/or Europe) under the bus the moment it suits their purpose - Yep!
The unholy mess caused by the sociopath AKA Orangeutang at a time crucial for the survival of a European democracy (Ukraine) should be a message to all Europeans - no matter the cost, Europe must take care of Europe and buy European equipment which needs no permissions/strings attached from US corporate needs or Governmental interferences.
We should treat the US armed forces as a friend and made to feel welcome if they turn up but always, always, always have another option to fill those gaps the US will leave when their (excellent and well maintained and trained) forces do an about turn because of the sort of politican infighting bullshit which has so damaged poor little Ukraine. We must never again put any sort of reliance on the USA here in Europe. For a decade or two it will seem insurmountable we can replace what the US has (theoretically at least) brought to NATO but replace them we must. Better to have no friend than a friend which cannot be trusted.
BTW - I am not anti-American. Quite the opposite. My wife is American (Ex-USAF) so half of my family is American and lives there. I am merely a pragmatist and thus am absolutely distrustful of any US governmental decision to assist, support any situation my country is likely to find themselves in, the moment it proves to be no longer profitable or helpful to the US.
We are no more immune to that problem than the US or any other nation wishing to remain viable in this arena.
The Martlet has already been used in Ukraine as an anti helicopter missile.
The British army also has big bad Boris give him a megaphone on the battlefield and im sure the enemy would run 😂😂😂
I doubt he'd get the megaphone to work!
What about Skylon.?
It's my understanding that is still just at the conceptual stage and may or may not be viable. All of these things listed here are at various stages of testing or production.
All high cost assets
But where are the $500 Drones
They can be bought off the shelf from a great many smaller producers. Watch what comes from the Ukrainian drone factories about a year from now - I'm guessing they will head the world in cheap drone manufacturing. There is one British drone which is still in development however, started its life as a Turkish design. Not sure if it will ever be accepted into service or even pushed for mass production but there was a lot of noise about 18 months ago about it and it's gone quiet since. I think it was being called Jackal but I might be mixing that up with something else.
Japan is also on team tempest.
we can't even get the metros or buses to run in this country let alone have advanced weaponry
@Kermit Idiothunter Actually the UK is the 7th largest arms exporter in the world however it mainly sells arms to under developed nations, the only thing wrong is your source of statistics 😂by the way the UK has one of the overall worst public transport systems in Europe, that is pretty poor when you consider that there are 44 countries in Europe and more then half have a lower gdp. speaking of stats, I should charge you for the next lesson
@Kermit Idiothunter If you re read my last comment I did not say third world countries I said under developed countries. I consider Saudi Arabia an under developed nation as even though it is a very wealthy country it's laws on equality and the treatment of women are very archaic.
To answer your first question there were 2.5 billion journeys on public transport made in the UK last year so I would say that millions of people rely on it regularly. I agree with you that the standards on busses, metros, trains and even public roads are substandard in Britain and so is the service by many of the drivers and transport staff. But let’s be completely honest they are over worked and underpaid as are many of the sectors in the UK. This is the governments fault as they continually mismanage the country and undermine its natural resources to the extent of negligence. For example the Prime minister has declared today that he will make it mandatory for people in England to study math until the age of 18 years old, this is unenforceable as the education systems curriculum in England can only instruct mandatory learning until the age of 16 years old. This shows the incompetence from the government and the prime minister from a high level. This lesson is £1.50 as mentioned before I will be charging, I hope that you had an enjoyable evening. I leave you with these words from Albert Einstein - We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. 😊
god you people are so boring and stupid - these same comments on every video about the British army (or anything really)
you do realise that your local council budget and the entire fucking defence budget might be slightly different?
i have a new respect for UK, they have balls. I guess they did not like the russian poisonings on their soil.
Yes Matt entirely agree with every word you say. Trouble is will Trump agree and stay in NATO?
Or if he wins, will he inadvertently liberate Europe from NATO, and force them to decide strategic affairs for themselves again? LOL.
Suddenly the EU manages to get that combined armed force they always talk about but never do? Suddenly the UK stops acting as if the Americans colonized them? Brilliant!
Like most Canadians, I hate the demented clown, the Emperor of Morons, but even a broken clock can be right right twice a day.
He will either win or he will lose. If he wins he will either remain or go solo. Who cares? There will be a huge gap in the NATO defence shield to fill but Europe can and must continue to strengthen as if the US is no longer there. That they can and have played such horrendous games with Ukraine and by association the security of Europe with their political infighting bullshit has amply demonstrated we should merely treat them as a welcome friend if they turn up and continue to act as though they are no longer interested. Either way NATO will continue no matter what it may be called in the future. Put your hand in a bucket of sand, withdraw it, how long did the ripples last?
European defence is in the hands of Europe not the US - they can no longer be trusted and WILL throw Europe under the bus if it suits their purpose. It's taken a sociopathic madman like the Orangeutang to make Europe wake up to the fact we CANNOT and SHOULD NOT put our faith in anyone other than Europe to defend Europe.
I wince every time this poor girl tries to pronounce Dreadnought (Dretnuht) and deterrent (deddarent).
I just want to whisper it into her little ear 🤣
She has a really nice voice though. Makes watching these videos so much better
Don’t hold your breath
Tempest wont be ready by 2024. Would be lucky it was operational by 2036. Its a long process to design, test and stress test a jet.
It says that it won’t enter service until at least 2035 you may want to reread the thing as I think you read the wrong description
@@kellyritchie3537 im not sure it wasnt edited. I remember listening twice when I heard it say 2024. Could be wrong, but I didnt post that on a whim.
@@Britwithadrone at okay I was just talking about what it said as in on the screen what the description said
Tempest is now a joint programme with Japan and Italy for a 6th Gen fighter.
We did a tech demonstrator in the 90's. That's how we become a tier 1 partner on F-35.. we proved we had the stealth knowledge to the Yanks. The UK will never make a jet fighter again on it's own sadly.
@@36thulsterdiv72I prefer it this way, before when we made our own stuff there was a huge problem….
It’d typically be cancelled last second
At least with other backers that’s not an option
Give me a break. Britain a superpower? We can’t protect our own shores, this duty now belongs to the RNLI.
Care to expand on that?
What do you want me to say? To define the primary role of our Navy which is to protect our shores from invasion? The Royal Navy and its ships are MIA, if they were doing what they should then we would not have the influx of rubber dinghy’s arriving on our shores (escorted by the RNLI). So you tell me if I am wrong please, better still, explain in your own words what you don’t get about my reply? On you go.
@@hughbarr8408 On you go!!!!???
Challenge accepted and stupid comment very easily swatted aside.
The Royal Navy has its orders and its responsibilities issued to it through the government. If the government does not task the RN then the RN will not be in a position to have an affect one way or the other.
That's what the Border Force is for - if you don't like the way they are being employed (and I most certainly do not either) then your avenue of complaint should be through them or through you local MP.
The Royal Navy and RAF joint operations offer the protection they are tasked with which is why there are no bad actors causing us harm/damage.
Any other logic you need help with?
I ope that none of these systems are ever used in my life time (i am 62) and my sons
Some of them are already in use in Ukraine and supplied by the British government to them for trials, operation testing and even in operational use. Martel for example has been used for a couple of years now I believe even if in very restricted numbers.
Very interesting. India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:-
10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite)
9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI.
8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to.
7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class).
6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile).
5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing)
4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability.
3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing)
2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order)
1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
I'm Indian, but the truth is india like China use cheap materials and most of the vast number of military still use world war2 weapon's, also look at Indias defense budget compared to the UK that will answer everyones questions and answers????????
@@siisaac9951 Your assertions are garbage. Let me explain why:-
1.) _"Indians use cheap materials"_
What basis do you have for this assertion? I take this accusation very seriously because this is my professional area of expertise. Judging by your comment you are absolutely clueless about Indian materials. Do you know what steel is used for Indian submarines? It is DMR292A, a special grade developed in India and now manufactured at Rourkela, India. It has a yield strength of between 700 and 1000 MPa. This is in the same class as the HY-100 and HY-130 steels (690 and 900 MPa respectively) that started being used in the American Nuclear Submarines relatively recently from the Seawolf class onwards. Meanwhile, where is UK? It does make superior submarines but the steel for them is not even made in the UK (as per Viscount Younger of Leckie who asked this question in the House of Commons at 2:30 pm on 30 November 2021).
Let me give you another example: The Low-Nickel High-Nitrogen Steel used in manufacturing of the hull of the Arjun Mk1A tank has superior ballistic performance and lower weight compared to the RHA steel on Challenger 2 tank. (Even though I agree that the Arjun Mk1A is inferior to the Challenger 2, the aforementioned fact on materials remains true i.e. Indian material used is better).
Just because one entity (OFB) in entire Indian military industry has had the history of shoddy manufacturing does not mean entire Indian manufacturing sector is like that.
2.) _"Indian military still uses vast amounts of WW2 weaponry"_ .
One can argue that slow modernization has led to large quantities of almost obsolete equipment, to call it WW2 equipment is patently false.
The only three pieces of WW2 equipment Indian Army still uses are: Sterling Carbine, Bren LMG and Browning M2. Apart from these absolutely NO piece of equipment is of WW2 vintage. I dare you to name a SINGLE such weapon other than ones I listed.
Now Sterling and Bren are being withdrawn but Browning M2 is timeless, even the Americans use that WW1 vintage.
3.) _"Look at UK military budget and Indian military budget"_ .
Ok, let us do that:-
Indian Military budget: $76.6 Billion
UK Military budget: $68.4 Billion
^Figures for 2021 from SPIRI 2022 report.
Indian Military Capital Expenditure (2023): $20 Billion
UK Military Capital Expenditure (2021): $17.7 Billion
^Sources are respective govt. budget documents.
Largely comparable figures. But I know your assertion is that Indian military is so much larger, right? So Indian military gets less bang for buck, right? WRONG!
Example:-
Cost of 500 km of High Speed Rail in both nations being constructed at roughly the same timeframe:-
HS2 (UK): $100-140 Billion
Mumbai Shinkansen (India): $21 Billion
Why such a massive difference? Because you were comparing nominal figures like a m0r0n instead of accounting for cost of living, etc as done by PPP figures. Everything costs more in UK. And their procurement is just as wasteful (Ajax anyone?).
*Get out of your pathetic inferiority complex.* I am not saying that UK has no advantages or no things where we can learn lessons from them. But to worship them because of your own inferiority complex to the point that you level such baseless accusations as "poor material" on Indian weapons is simply pathetic and factually wrong.
You do know that Britain has helped with a lot of your naval projects don't you and other military projects 😮
@@dadsnotcharlies7686 Oh yeah? List some then. I mean, sure, maybe a few projects. But "most"? As always, the British penchant for tall claims and taking credit for others' work is alive and well.
India is advancing fast but still far behind in developing their own weapons. Mainly aircraft, the only jet India has ever built is the HAL tejas which rely on a cheap American engine and wouldn't pose any threat to most other fighter jets around the world, even chinese ones.
India does excel over the UK is some areas such as their space program, but when it comes to building and designing airctaftcarriers, submarines and aircraft the UK still exceed India
WOW SO MANY ERROS. MACK 5 LOL LIKE 6 X THAT SEPEED
I would like to see upcoming weapon to Japan and China,please.
Great material for them
Europeans will never get them in sufficient numbers though it's a pipedream
That remains to be seen.
My pics are BAE Tempest 6th gen stealth jet fighter, Directed high energy weapon, Martlet Air to surface missile, Perseus Cruise missile and UCAV Taranis. Hello from India 🇮🇳. Dear Buzz Please 🙏 make video on future weapons of India.
No need to bug this poor channel owner. Let me tell you: India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:-
10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite)
9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI.
8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to.
7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class).
6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile).
5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing)
4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability.
3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing)
2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order)
1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
@@death_parade just listing things that are similar to what the brits have does not make you as technically advanced as them. india buys cheap products from russia that are not even comparable to what the UK and other western countries are developing. Do you really think that your subs are comparable to vanguard class subs when even the US admits that the UK is the best manufacture of stealth subs. The HAL AMCA Mk2 is a fifth gen fighter and tempest will be a 6-th gen fighter. The problem with using scamjets to get over mach 5 is that communicating with the missile becomes almost impossible (due to plasma generated), its not manuverable due to its high speed and its not stealth because of its high heat signature.
Due to peacetime, the idea is that most of the money goes onto R&D and not into the army - focusing on highly skilled teams like the SAS and SBS. This is the problem india has, they need to spend alot on their big army because they aren't really at peacetime at the moment so less money can be spent on R&D. Also, the UK armed forces have alot more experience in combat than india.
😊
Make a video on India 2022 too, Top 10 upcoming
Let's hope that this new government doesn"t begin with unneseccary cutting of budgets .....
Bl....dy labour😢
they will be ready in 2050.......
Maybe
We won’t even pay for replacement tanks so this is all just a wish list. Or we’ll actually follow through with it all but end up with 1 off each which is always in for refit after it inevitably breaks down. Our government is disgraceful but as for the military itself I’m fully behind them
ok doomer
@@mn5499 literally anything positive about UK military gets met with these bullshit cry babies commenting on 'UK FAILED STATE DOOMED UK BAD'
so, how about an anti in migration law to secure the country?
Or maybe a proper Coast Guard instead of the current lemon Coast Guard lolz
@@death_parade wait....waht....we have a coast guard ? i just thought that was the naval branch of uber ? :|
I didn’t think we actually made any of this stuff any more?
Most of it is manufactured in the UK. HMS Glasgow (Type 26 Frigate) is now afloat and undergoing the rest of its construction in Glasgow as we speak.
You gotta love the information & collation, but the delivery of ‘facts’ 🤥 any actual context at all, the blatant missing out of any development partners in the East..🤔 coupled with the supercilious way it’s presented is agonising 😩😂
Please make indian version
@Paul Mcdonnell instead of these weapons you need rishi sunak to stable your currency and gdp
As you requested, here is the Indian version: India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:-
10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite)
9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI.
8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to.
7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class).
6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile).
5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing)
4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability.
3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing)
2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order)
1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
By energy directed lasers they actually mean a man with a lantern and maybe a whistle shouting go home
Perseus was a cancelled American system from the 70s. What are you reading to put it on this list?!
Up coming Philippines weapon
What might those be?
bro upcoming weapons of india
India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:-
10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite)
9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI.
8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to.
7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class).
6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile).
5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing)
4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability.
3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing)
2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order)
1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
What's this a fantasy world with is wish list
10 upcoming weapons of France , Sweden, Russia and India
The computer generated voice is soooooooo annoying!
Future weapons of India
Let me give you the answer. India has comparable programs or already developed and deployed systems comparable to each of these 10 future weapons of the British military. Indian analogues of each British item on this list are:-
10.) Type 26 Frigate : Nilgiri class Frigate (all 7 already under construction, will have slightly more advanced weapons suite)
9.) DEW weapons : Multiple systems for anti-drone hardkill already tested by DRDO and others in development include the likes of MASER weapons like KALI.
8.) Mast-13 USV : Sagar Defence's USV which the Indian Navy just awarded the contract to.
7.) Dreadnought class submarine : S5 class SSBN (which I admit is not nearly at the same tech level as the Dreadnought class, more like on the level of current Vanguard class).
6.) Perseus missile : BrahMos missile (been in service for more than a decade. Heck, India has already flight tested even scramjet engines so by the time Brits get the Perseus, India would already have moved on to a scramjet powered hypersonic cruise missile).
5.) BAE Tranis : Ghatak UCAV (test flights of its TD version called SWiFT ongoing)
4.) Type 31 Frigate : NGC or Shivalik class or Talwar class, multiple classes are similar in capability.
3.) Martlet missile : modified form of DRDO VSHORAD (already flight testing)
2.) Sky Sabre : MRSAM(Barak-8) (already deployed and more on order)
1.) BAE Tempest : HAL AMCA Mk2 (heck India has already started flight testing MUMT and optionally manned concepts using the 4.5th gen Tejas Naval variant as a testbed).
@@death_parade If and when India is producing weapons systems of the same standard as other companies are offering the British government will beat a path to their doors either for collaborational purposes, to produce under licence or maybe even straightforward purchasing.
Another factor which may (and rightfully should) influence any British connection with India will be the Indian connection with Russia.
India, scientifically and industrially is a future player for sure but........... a trusted player? - the jury will have to remain out on that for a while yet.
@@Scaleyback317 Who said anything about British connection with India? India neither wants nor needs British vote of confidence on India's weapons industry. Only somebody totally clueless would believe that arms purchases are about buying the best quality, we all know how geopolitics is more important. UK is too deep into US orbit to even consider buying from India.
As for being a "trusted player," again, India is not looking to be some sort of a "trusted player" of the West. Because by default that involves bending over backwards to placate the Americans. And India has already refused that offer multiple times. India stands alone. We are not averse to collaborations with the West or alignment on common interests (like containing China), but that can not and will not come at the cost of India's sovereign authority.
Reason I pointed out that list is because Western arms have for long been considered the "top of the line" in India. And the fact that India's own technology is catching up and even surpassing the technology of its colonizers in some areas is a deeply reassuring and satisfying fact for Indians: tells us that we are on the right track and that our dreams of being a truly independent nation are slowly coming true. At the same time, it also reminds us that a ship load of work still remains for us to be able to close that gap in technologies such as submarines, jet engines, etc.
Shall we fix world poverty?
Nah let’s have another arms race
Yeah let’s just focus on fixing poverty while other nations threaten the lives of everyone no matter their wealth or social status. Dumbass…
Well considering a nuclear power has launched a land war in Europe.. Do you propose throwing gravy chips at Putin as an act of aggression, instead of bringing the British military back upto a state of readiness to protect UK interests?
WAY TO MUCH VOCAL FRY ON THIS GIRL I JUST CANT LISTEN TO HER BETTER TO MUTE.
what an awful narrative style
Inglaterra não consegui manter um governo por mais de 45 dias e com uma população que empobrece rapidamente. Pensa em dominação Mundial ainda.
Seria risível se não fosse trágico!
Gosto desse canal, dei Likes!
What the F are you talking about? What are you Italian? Yeah, because the Italian government isn't massively corrupt is it??
Stick to worrying about your own country instead of making up lies about mine!
Says an Argentinian who fled to Brazil. 😂 🖕🏼
Ah yes because we all know Brazil is a politically stable country isn't it? How are the favelas doing? 🤣
Someone is bitter
all of these are a waist of time, they are designed to attack imaginary enemy , legends in their own mind
Russia are the enemy of civilized and free countries, they need regime change and possibly a cull of their toxic ideology.
We know who are our friends & if you ain’t one of them you are a potential enemy. We do not actively seek conflict but we will deal with any threat firmly & if necessary fatally. 🇬🇧
@@colinpearce5856 no different to any other country , your not exceptional
@@henrycollins7680 I think you are overlooking the money the U.K. spends on weapons R&D and our armed forces proven history of doing more with less, but there is no convincing you I am sure. So we will agree to disagree.
@@colinpearce5856 nope , seen the weapons seen the performance , over rated min 2 gen behind , but really, any weapon used is lethal regardless where it comes from
don't overdo praising the British, the current UK army is weak and has little equipment, there are few soldiers, the country is heading for a civil war and the British should deal with that first because they brought millions of Muslim immigrants and other Africans to the country who rape, steal and kill without any consequences. Great Britain is not as good as the US and China, just look at the production in these countries, the number of planes, missiles, ammunition, etc.
🇨🇱🇬🇧
The British need to double its armed forces, maybe that their government will wake up and spend more money on their armed forces.
🇬🇧
The British have already fallen behind.
We do our best and will find other sources for what we cannot provide ourselves. Did you listen to the breakdown of Skysabre sources for the finished article for example?
Lol low level tech
Global combat ship??? Hahaha this Is Lobbys Commonwealth ship, with mini missile camm, anti sub from thales, Toy gun shot peas bofors since great war, and derivate from 40mm, 2 x 3 launch torpedo, ancient sting ray, no dual band radar helo ancient lynx. this Is 2 classe ship ha ha ha. I am Sorry for not speak One english barbar language, but i speak Romance language 😂💙🎇
Wot?
@@nickjung7394 they're a jealous Italian
No you speak pure shite!
Procurement in the uk is a laugh every one of these here.nobody will see for a least twenty years or more.then when they are ready.they will be obsolete.because the uk mod is a f_____ joke
Unfortunately there is a large dose of proveable reality in that statement.