Upgrade from Dual Band to Triple Band, GEODNET

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2023
  • #GEODNET #TIPIN #blockchain
    For those of you wanting to upgrade and worrying about technically complex it is...if ya have a screwdriver, tweezers, and scissors, you'll be just fine. Here's the Full Savage version.
    𝐏𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐮𝐩 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞: grstl.ink/geodnet
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 18

  • @hectorc-05
    @hectorc-05 Год назад +4

    This is so RAD! .... to have Gristle King rocking one of my NEW favorite projects! ... Rock On!

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад +1

      Heck yeah! Easy little upgrade to do, psyched to continually improve.

  • @nezbitsmythe1
    @nezbitsmythe1 Год назад +2

    Cool. Now I know what to do when my upgrade arrives!

  • @marcoarancibia5756
    @marcoarancibia5756 Год назад +2

    Rock & Roll bro! Mine just got here in Chile. Master Chile in da house 💪🏼🇨🇱

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад

      Right on, always good to build more coverage! Keep on truckin'

  • @sweetmaanu
    @sweetmaanu Год назад +2

    Incredible, video helped a lot 🙂

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад +1

      Glad it helped! Def something that seemed way harder than it actually is.

  • @TheSebilica
    @TheSebilica Год назад +1

    Thank you for the video! Really helpful! Quick question: after the upgrade, how long before you could see the rewards back on track? I've done the upgrade yesterday and even though it's online , it doesn't receives rewards, at all. Cheers!

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад +2

      Hi Paturca, I saw mine updated after about 24 hours. I *think* these are manually updated, send an email to support with your miner serial number to make sure it goes through.

    • @TheSebilica
      @TheSebilica Год назад +1

      @@thegristleking OK, thank you!

  • @josephcavaluzzi4845
    @josephcavaluzzi4845 Год назад

    What if you don’t do step 5? Removing the screw thingys? Cause yea I didn’t do that..

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад +1

      Pretty sure there's a 19 second initiation to detonation if screw thingys aren't removed. ;) I don't think anything happens if you don't remove 'em, just won't be as stable.

  • @chats5957
    @chats5957 Год назад

    Who's gonna use the RTK corrections? Especially since the GNSS antennas aren't installed with a certificate certifying their location, or physically installed to a required standard, so they're useless to any professional user.
    Also most states provide free public CORS RTK services, with certified base stations and traceability that guarantees accurate measurements.
    There is no point installing these base stations within 25km of an existing base, so extra base stations at a greater density are a waste of money and time.
    Is this going to be another helium project with lots of nodes, and no users?

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад

      Hi chats, sounds like you're missing some key points.
      1) GEODNET already has paying customers, so the question of "who's going to use it" isn't valid. Customers are using it.
      2) The locations are certified and set using an industry standard practice. I'm not sure where you got the info that they're not.
      3) The free public CORS RTK is not available in "most states", and what it provides is low quality; generally 12 satellites GPS+GLO, dual band. The data quality is so low that those stations would get zero rewards on GEODNET.
      4) The idea that there's "no point in installing within 25 km..." is not true. More base stations are key for working with low-end rovers like Android phones.
      Appreciate you writing in and commenting, glad to be able to clear up some of the misunderstanding! Also saw your same comments on another video about this. You just trolling, dawg? ;)

    • @chats5957
      @chats5957 Год назад

      @@thegristleking I'd better hand back my spatial science degree because if anything you said is true my thesis paper isn't worth the paper it's written on.
      The GEODNET founder posted on surveying and geodetic forums about his crypto powered RTK system. He didn't get the uptake he was expecting because those with any knowledge in the field can see that no spatial professional would be allowed to use it because it doesn't meet the required standards. Better off buying your own GNSS base and streaming corrections over NTRIP, UHF or LoRa.
      PS - if you want to track pot plants in a nursery with centimetre accuracy using corrections provided by geodnet, each receiver will need to be dual frequency and have a correction stream coming in via LTE, WiFi or radio. Also each pot would need a GEODNET subscription which would be expensive. Cheapest option would be to deploy an RTK bridge onsite that receives corrections over the internet and then transmits the network corrections across the site via UHF.

    • @thegristleking
      @thegristleking  Год назад

      @@chats5957 hmm, I don't think you have the full picture, but we can agree to disagree. Oh, as an aside, I'd be fairly careful about making rash statements regarding handing back your spatial science degree if "anything [I] said is true". You probably took so many spatial science classes that you skipped Logic 101. Based on what you said, I only need to show one thing is true for you to hand over a piece of paper you probably worked very hard to earn.
      What's your thesis paper? I'd like to take a look.