Actually, I love the fact shit goes up so often now it's not even on the news. I just heard about this now. It is cool though. If you haven't seen it, there is a video about the Saturn V "computer". It's amazing. ruclips.net/video/6mMK6iSZsAs/видео.html&ab_channel=SmarterEveryDay2
And where is the actual proof that we are looking at the rocket that was just launched , and not another booster that landed a year ago? There should be a small drone on the ship , ready to take off and take a clip of the actual landing
@@timpowers4192 you know if you ever watched an explanation video you would know how extremely inconvenient it is to keep a drone ship camera outputting live footage, and, I believe it’s recorded. Assuming you’re a flat earther denying this as real footage, If they already have the recording of it landing, why not just play it as live footage?
Also consider they've launched 40-50 satellites at a time for how many launches now? They probably had almost a thousand up there already. Losing 40 wasn't crippling at all.
I wonder why the change of the color of the engine nozzle of the second stage? They didn't cover the change even when camera tensely stared at it for a while. The lens has almost got cracked over it.
@@jaygrenham It couldn't be, the second stage is expendable and a new one is used for every flight. If you are referring to the change in colour from the upper and lower parts of the nozzle, that is simply because one part is in direct sun while the other is in shadow. If you look at the glow of the nozzle you will see it looks brighter on the part of the rocket that's in shadow.
@@Miniz yeah! some sh.. i mean soot gets collected over the turbine exhaust manifold in fluffy swabs that roll over it. how it happens in space is hard to understand. there must be some leak. they build the constellation in a quite peculiar way.
The ring is there to help keep the rocket nozzle's shape on ignition. it's designed to fall off once the rocket has developed thrust. Completely normal. 🙂
I think the Starlink satellite constellation will be continuously replaced with updated satellites. Once Starship becomes operational, SpaceX will be able to deliver 400 satellites at a time, instead of 50.
Why they still using go pros with the fish eye lens? Earth looks flat, then con-caved, then round.. also, I love how ever landing the camera glitches. Launching how many a week? How can you tel the difference between the launches? They all look the same except I didn’t see the mouse running around the Merlin engine this time.
credit for this comment goes to Jesbaam Sanchez: The camera on the barge is connected and transmitted via laser to a satellite. The vibrations coming from the first stage causes the laser to be misaligned hence the disconnect from the landing scene.
Because you have selective vision to cater to your thinly-vieled "it's fake" agenda. There are plenty of launches with uninterrupted video that you choose to ignore.
With all of SpaceX's technological prowess why can they virtually never get video footage of the landing without the cameras or some other glitch ruining it? Not a high priority, I guess.
not a high priority. if something should go wrong they would what to go back and look at the footage correct. so there is footage we just never see it why.
The camera on the barge is connected and transmitted via laser to a satellite. The vibrations coming from the first stage causes the laser to be misaligned hence the disconnect from the landing scene.
@@thayalanasokumar5141 lol well I am pursing a mech engr degree (almost done one year left) and also it helps when you have RUclips channels like Scott Manely or Everyday Astronaut teaching about space related information. I am gravitating towards aerospace lol
@@majestic7768 Funny how one arsehole can go from believing it's all a lie to believing the Russians have better rockets. Still, producing shit is the only job an arsehole has to do.
SpaceX usually announces their launches pretty loudly through their popular channels. Don't depend on msm to cater to your personal interests & hobbies.
@@callmeshaggy5166 sad that rocket launches in the state don't get any coverage, even by state oriented stations. But I shouldn't be surprised. There's probably not alot of money to be gained by broadcasting it I guess.
SpaceX can send astronomers, robots, telescopes and more satellites up and further out so they can see what they want to see and communicate it to each other and the rest of the world.
I do really want Starlink internet. However the hardware costs around £300 then you have to pay roughly £80 per month for the privilege. Too expensive for sure!
Yee Gods I wish I was a scrap metal merchant with all the rich pickings in the stratosphere and beyond. A time is fast approaching when one will need a forward reservation as to where one can park your heavenly body. Satellite to the uninitiated.
Oh really? Where in that sentence does it say: "showing" nailed booster landing? :) Then nailed the landing. As you can see but the photage in the end. Cheers :)
@@toxic7829 Yes good point, I agree, which is why I said 'implied' but maybe wrong word. I love the landings when shown. Will delete the comment if I am off base, cheers as well :)
Its all very impressive from Elon Musk and SpaceX, as per usual, and I am a fan of both but do we really need 50 more pieces of hardware in low-earth orbit, no matter how small they may be??!! We already have so much ‘stuff’ and junk in orbit, at what point do we start losing vital hardware due to collisions. It can’t be long, if it hasn’t happened already.
You are mistaken. These satellites work off modular waves that disconnect bilaterally and reconnect on the newer non-sequitur wavelength thereby not only lessoning any and all papal nutrient distortion but enhancing it.
@@jaygrenham Nuremberg trial will be reopened, this time for characters like Elon Musk, Putin and so on. They will be sentenced for crimes against humanity.
Hilarious- look at how the shape of the Earth is never consistent- You'd think with all their money they'd be able to fake the footage better than this.
@Mudkip909 - I never said it was flat , little psycho trigger. You obviously have some hysteria attached to that topic though , and feel intellectually challenged ,to react as you did. Why are you so scared of the idea then?
That never gets old.
It NEVER does
Actually, I love the fact shit goes up so often now it's not even on the news. I just heard about this now. It is cool though. If you haven't seen it, there is a video about the Saturn V "computer". It's amazing. ruclips.net/video/6mMK6iSZsAs/видео.html&ab_channel=SmarterEveryDay2
"I still love you" somebody can't get over another.
It's a taunt to the one from her billionaire lover 😆
Can Elon put our politicians on mars so they stop causing wars .
@THE DUDE Vlad "what"
"you are ordered to start a war which will lead to half the world and the USA kicking your arse"
Vlad "ok"
Flawless operation as usual. Falcon 9 equals cash machine
Aside from the footage.
wonder what that was at 5:25 ? Its single and "breaks apart" but the parts that break off take a slight weird curve direction
Why can't we get better footage of the landing?
And where is the actual proof that we are looking at the rocket that was just launched , and not another booster that landed a year ago? There should be a small drone on the ship , ready to take off and take a clip of the actual landing
Simply unbelievable! incredible time we live in!
All that amazing technology and performance and still can’t seem to keep the drone ship cameras working
It's getting blasted by rocket exhaust and plasma. What amazing technology & performance are you referring to that blocks such signal interference?
Maybe you dont fully understand how shit works
Yes, awfully convenient......
@@timpowers4192 you know if you ever watched an explanation video you would know how extremely inconvenient it is to keep a drone ship camera outputting live footage, and, I believe it’s recorded. Assuming you’re a flat earther denying this as real footage, If they already have the recording of it landing, why not just play it as live footage?
Replacing the 100 sats that were knocked out by the solar storm. You get that feeling in the end the Sun will always win.
40 but who is counting!!
Also consider they've launched 40-50 satellites at a time for how many launches now? They probably had almost a thousand up there already. Losing 40 wasn't crippling at all.
@@callmeshaggy5166 Next solar storm could wipe out many hundreds. The Sun in the end always has the final say on the things we do
@@callmeshaggy5166 Musk said on Jan. 15 that SpaceX had 1,469 Starlink satellites active and 272 moving to operational orbits soon.
What happened to the landing footage?
SpaceX is a perfect example of what happen when an Engineer and not a bean-counter runs an engineering company.
The definition of a waste of space. A bus load of bean counters going over a cliff, with an empty seat. Bom, Bom❗️
and when govt's stay out of the way!!
@@mikethetoolman8776 Musk has cashed in billions of dollars of US government support.
And “the engineer” is one of the richest persons on Earth and has billions of dollars to spend on his projects.
I wonder why the change of the color of the engine nozzle of the second stage? They didn't cover the change even when camera tensely stared at it for a while. The lens has almost got cracked over it.
Its soot from previous flights that makes the color change like that. It was explained on a video I watched a week ago. Was wondering the same thing.
@@jaygrenham soot on the second stage from previous flight? huh?
@@jaygrenham It couldn't be, the second stage is expendable and a new one is used for every flight. If you are referring to the change in colour from the upper and lower parts of the nozzle, that is simply because one part is in direct sun while the other is in shadow. If you look at the glow of the nozzle you will see it looks brighter on the part of the rocket that's in shadow.
@@mroygl Quite so! A new second stage rocket is used for every flight.
@@Miniz yeah! some sh.. i mean soot gets collected over the turbine exhaust manifold in fluffy swabs that roll over it. how it happens in space is hard to understand. there must be some leak. they build the constellation in a quite peculiar way.
2.57 mins in what was that flew off bottom of rocket in the shape of a ring on second stage
The ring is there to help keep the rocket nozzle's shape on ignition. it's designed to fall off once the rocket has developed thrust. Completely normal. 🙂
how many launch will there be in able to complete the starlink mission ?
A few since the full Starlink constellation will consist of approximately 8000 nano satellites. You can do the math.
I think the Starlink satellite constellation will be continuously replaced with updated satellites. Once Starship becomes operational, SpaceX will be able to deliver 400 satellites at a time, instead of 50.
They need to figure out how to get the camera to work before trying to head to Mars!🤣
I'm watching this using StarLink!
Why isn't max Pressure called Max P???? for pressure.
SpaceX making it look easy. 😎
Is there a reason that could possibly make any sense as to why the nozzle changes color? And only partially at first...?
None of those answers are satisfactory... it doesn't matter anyway, Space is Fake...
@@Verbal_Sin your purpose in life is fake
Always great to see now....whether it's the 40th or 104th etc
Why they still using go pros with the fish eye lens? Earth looks flat, then con-caved, then round.. also, I love how ever landing the camera glitches. Launching how many a week? How can you tel the difference between the launches? They all look the same except I didn’t see the mouse running around the Merlin engine this time.
But they still can’t get the video from the ship to stay online.
Because they are a bunch of liars, probably the screen on the right is in an IMAX studio.
@THE DUDE you and majestic77 should get a room.
credit for this comment goes to Jesbaam Sanchez:
The camera on the barge is connected and transmitted via laser to a satellite. The vibrations coming from the first stage causes the laser to be misaligned hence the disconnect from the landing scene.
@@majestic7768
@@majestic7768 Lets put you on the barge with an iphone...
Amazing. Simply amazing.
These guys are amazing!
What no mouse running across the engine?
Why the live video stream is always disrupted at critical moments, like booster landing, stage speration....etc.... 🙄😒
Because you have selective vision to cater to your thinly-vieled "it's fake" agenda. There are plenty of launches with uninterrupted video that you choose to ignore.
Every time I watch one of these landings, it reminds me of Silver Cup Bread.
With all of SpaceX's technological prowess why can they virtually never get video footage of the landing without the cameras or some other glitch ruining it? Not a high priority, I guess.
Just wondered the same thing. Kinda helps the whole fake moonlanding theory!
not a high priority. if something should go wrong they would what to go back and look at the footage correct. so there is footage we just never see it why.
Off topic but how do people believe the earth is flat after they watch this video
....Simply because they believe that the footage is a projection of a fake round earth onto a screen in the background.
Lol at the concave horizon at 3:08
thank - you .
Need more cameras 👍
they are constantly posting animated images ... the image like a cartoon is a fake image.. .... What studio are they in?
Spot ON
Why the landing scene is always disconnected?
The camera on the barge is connected and transmitted via laser to a satellite. The vibrations coming from the first stage causes the laser to be misaligned hence the disconnect from the landing scene.
@@JesbaamSanchez God damn... that's pretty technical explanation. Thank u
@@thayalanasokumar5141 lol well I am pursing a mech engr degree (almost done one year left) and also it helps when you have RUclips channels like Scott Manely or Everyday Astronaut teaching about space related information. I am gravitating towards aerospace lol
Can Elon deliver a Novichok cocktail to Russia, with love.
They have Soyuz over there, better than your garbage.
@@majestic7768 better than reusability rockets to a country that doesn't have any 😂😂😂😂
Right.
they can land the stage 1 on a drone ship, can the land a nuke on Putins head?
@@majestic7768 Funny how one arsehole can go from believing it's all a lie to believing the Russians have better rockets. Still, producing shit is the only job an arsehole has to do.
@@chrisantoniou4366 I laughed at his "rationality" too. 😀
Man, I wish media made people aware of this stuff. I would've looked up.
SpaceX usually announces their launches pretty loudly through their popular channels. Don't depend on msm to cater to your personal interests & hobbies.
@@callmeshaggy5166 sad that rocket launches in the state don't get any coverage, even by state oriented stations. But I shouldn't be surprised. There's probably not alot of money to be gained by broadcasting it I guess.
WOW! just WOW!
Are these the one for Ukraine?
Majestic77 is seriously ill....
lmao ikr
Stupidity isn't an illness... no cure
I love rockets.
Now they need to work on second stage recovery.
*7:57*
Spacex is launching so frequently, it's hard to keep up....
Some of those Starlink will be positioned over Ukraine to provide internet service.
Yeah brought down by Aliens haha, we saw the alien ship give the asteroid into the sun causing this, haha
Nails booster landing... Honestly, I don't want anything bad to happen, but we're due for a stupid booster crash....
awesome launch and recovery, but starlink does nothing but pollute the night sky for astronomers. so I have mixed feelings about the whole thing.
That is a very expensive way to throw out the trash.
SpaceX can send astronomers, robots, telescopes and more satellites up and further out so they can see what they want to see and communicate it to each other and the rest of the world.
NASA...are you paying attention....this is how you do it.
NASA isn't in the business of providing global Internet access.
Show de bola !!
Pure
I hope SpaceX has a plan for all this space-junk that they're generating.
what space junk are you referring to?
can make a rocket and send sattelites yet can't fix camera going off
I do really want Starlink internet. However the hardware costs around £300 then you have to pay roughly £80 per month for the privilege. Too expensive for sure!
$10 billion investment to be recouped is why it is expensive
I should call her
Ha what would happen if we put a stealth glider atomic bomb on the top of space x rocet?
Here’s the trail filmed passing over London: ruclips.net/video/ValDXsuysZU/видео.html
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤗💙
Ufo in video hahaha 😆
More space junk
Yee Gods I wish I was a scrap metal merchant with all the rich pickings in the stratosphere and beyond. A time is fast approaching when one will need a forward reservation as to where one can park your heavenly body. Satellite to the uninitiated.
It would be great if SpaceX would use the AMERICAN SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT since this is an American industry!
imperial system is ass
Good grief the whole world uses the metric system. Only the US doesn't for some odd reason. The metric system is superior.
Poorly titled: "nails booster landing" implies it would be shown
Oh really? Where in that sentence does it say: "showing" nailed booster landing? :) Then nailed the landing. As you can see but the photage in the end. Cheers :)
@@toxic7829 Yes good point, I agree, which is why I said 'implied' but maybe wrong word. I love the landings when shown. Will delete the comment if I am off base, cheers as well :)
Its all very impressive from Elon Musk and SpaceX, as per usual, and I am a fan of both but do we really need 50 more pieces of hardware in low-earth orbit, no matter how small they may be??!! We already have so much ‘stuff’ and junk in orbit, at what point do we start losing vital hardware due to collisions. It can’t be long, if it hasn’t happened already.
better than porn.
420
THEY WILL FAIL AND THEN SPACE EX WILL LAUNCH MORE SATS, THEN THEY WILL FAIL, ETC, ETC
That's not news anymore.
Those satelites are the covrig.
Their impulses created heart attack, and death.
You are mistaken. These satellites work off modular waves that disconnect bilaterally and reconnect on the newer non-sequitur wavelength thereby not only lessoning any and all papal nutrient distortion but enhancing it.
@@jaygrenham Nuremberg trial will be reopened, this time for characters like Elon Musk, Putin and so on. They will be sentenced for crimes against humanity.
@@AparatorulPoporului What ever you are smoking sir, please give me a link!
@@AparatorulPoporului
@@jaygrenham LOFL
Hilarious-
look at how the shape of the Earth is never consistent-
You'd think with all their money they'd be able to fake the footage better than this.
Aqua Sonic is a garden slug 🤡 !!!
Lenses with different focal lengths and therefore different angles of view. Look it up stupid!
Starlink trail filmed over London: ruclips.net/video/ValDXsuysZU/видео.html
@Mudkip909 - I never said it was flat , little psycho trigger.
You obviously have some hysteria attached to that topic though , and feel intellectually challenged ,to react as you did.
Why are you so scared of the idea then?
@@aquasonic5180 Stop being cute! You are very obviously a flat Earther or you wouldn't have posted your stupid reply regarding faked images of Earth.