"Kristoph killed Sven's parents". Right. So a 7 year old killed two adult reindeer and made their fur into his clothing. Seriously people, we see the two were already best friends since super young. And they were apart of a group of humans. The only morbid thing about that movie is that they were kidnapped and adopted by the trolls.
@@eligbell3542 I'd say maybe his parents did it, but I don't think Kristof has parents. I also doubt Sven's parents would be the ones killed anyhow. The group likely raised two types of Reigndeer. Working and resources. So if Sven is a worker, it is more than likely that his parents were also workers. They would only be used for clothing if they were sick and couldn't work, but their meat would be unusable.
@@amberlyrane8006 see that makes a lot more sense than a 7 year old killing 2 adult deer. Also since the two knew each other at a young age. It’s probably a completely different reindeer pelt by now
@@aroha-um2eq a 7 year old that was seen at the very beginning of the film with a baby Sven and they were already best buds. If 7 year old Kristof had some how managed to kill the father, a male reindeer which can be dangerous, and the mother, baby Sven would be very hesitant to be around Kristof at first because his parents were recently killed. The only way that theory works is if Kristof killed them when Sven was younger but that would also put Kristof younger, making it even harder for a literal child to kill two adult deer. Plus Kristof could barely get a block of ice in the opening scene. How is he going to kill 2 reindeer? It’s an ok theory but it completely disregards the very beginning of the movie.
So, idea that the person came up with is a cool concept but Up, was actually a slightly true story. I forget where it was, New York I'm pretty sure, but there was a businessman that bought a block, paid everyone to move out of their houses but 1 lady, who had been in the house since her husband built it, did not want to sell, he ended up befriending the lady, helping her with her yard work and house work, just being an all around good guy, and when she passed, she left it to him in her will and instead of tearing the house down, he put a crap ton of balloons out of the chimney (just like in the movie) in her memory and kept the house.. it's actually a super sad but incredibly awesome story
@Anne Hessler I know it's so cool! And I just absolutely love that the guy could've been a butthead and tear it down after she died but didn't, that shows honor, there's not enough honor in the world anymore
The whole frozen with Anna and Elsa’s parents being Tarzan parents can be completely disproven with the fact that Tarzan’s parents raised up the Union Jack on their Treehouse which for those who might not know the Union Jack is the British flag.
yea i was about to say the whole elsa and anna being sisters to tarzan theory is false because in frozen two it is confirmed that they drowned cuz they found their boat in the enchanted forest
Another point that disproves it is that in Tarzan, His parents escape the boat WITH A YOUNG CHILD. When Anna and Elsa's parents leave, they have no child, nor is the mom pregnant. Their trip also did not take months, merely days...
Plus, quite frankly, if anyone READS Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Tarzan's parents were British aristocracy - Lord and Lady Greystoke. They were not the King and Queen of any nordic country.
And there's an episode of the TV series where there is a time vortex and everyone is flung into the past and 'future' of Agrabah. Maybe all of the locations were actually past- which would explain how Abis Maal and his ancestor knew how to use the weapons.
Everyone seems to think it was Gaston who killed Bambi's mother, but I always thought Bambi took place somewhere in North America due to Bambi's being a white-tailed deer and the total lack of European accents, which could mean it was actually Amos Slade from The Fox and the Hound who killed Bambi's mom instead of Gaston.
The original book took place in Germany. Gaston is French. There was no skunk in the book either; Disney stuck in North American animals to appeal to his audience.
That makes a bit more sense. Although, the truck scene in The Fox and The Hound in which Amos and Copper return from their hunting trip seems to be filled with mostly fox fur.
If Gaston’s antler decoration is what led fans to believe he killed Bambi’s mother then that makes no sense because female deer (Doe) doesn’t have antlers.
Yeah, reindeer are the only deer that the females have antlers. Bambi and his mother were at first Roe deer that they changed at the last minute to white-tailed deer. Which now gives it the location of North America.
Actually Peter pan's story was told to children in the war so that they wouldn't be afraid of death. So it's kind of true that Peter pan can be seen as the angel of death. If you follow the actual use of the story for which it has been originally created.
Well we can disprove the bambi's mother theory as when his mother was killed by the unnamed hunter, it was still winter with plenty of snow on the ground. The scene in Beauty and the Beast that shows a deer drinking from a stream looks to be in the middle of or the beginning of fall. In addition, Bambi and his mother was grazing on some small patch of grass that was poking through snow....not near a stream. It was a good theory, but unfortunately it was not Gaston that had killed Bambi's mother.
Also, I don't know if this is wrong or not, but in The Jungle Book there was one scene where Shere Khan was trying to pounce on a female deer, could that female deer be Bambi's mother?
There's also the huge geographical difference. Bambi is clearly a white-tailed deer, which are endemic to North America, while Gaston and the entire cast of Beauty and the Beast are in France. The closest thing to Bambi in that area would've been a Fallow deer or Bambi's original concept, a Roe deer
8:35 no I'm sorry, you SEE Sven and Kristoff together at the very begining of the movie during the opening and add to that Kristoff is WAY too young in that scene to be killing anything much less Sven's parents. so that theory is just plain nonsense
Also Kristof was like, 7 or 8 in the beginning scene and we can see him with baby Sven. So he also could not have murdered Sven's parents for their fur.
I don't think that theory makes much sense considering Kristoff was a small child who would be incapable of kill two giant reindeer. What I think would make more sense would be how both ended up orphans. Maybe Kristoff's parents hunted reindeer and happened to be hunting Sven's and resulting in them killing each other. Leaving Kristoff and Sven alone in the woods, where the two eventually met up and relied on each other for survival until being found by the ice men in the beginning of the movie. That would explain their extremely close bond and why Kristoff thinks Sven can talk to him. Kristoff probably just bought his outfit.
I suppose you could say that, but then, how would you explain Hugo being able to actually hit one of the soldiers on the head as they were climbing up the ladders?
Frollo basically confirms that when he catches Quasimodo talking to them in at least the stage musical (disney version stage musical). I can't remember if the film does or not.
@@CinemaSongscovers Simple daydreams can get quite vivid the longer they are indulged, so I bet hallucinations can also become extremely interactive, especially ones that have been maintained for up-to twenty years. Also, keep in mind that during all the fighting, there was a ton of stuff going on in the background. Molten rock, falling debris (like when Frolo fell), and even a huge angry mob that could’ve easily contributed to why the soldiers actually fell. Heck they might’ve just tripped on their own, it’s not like they were in that great of shape. Not to mention, Quasi probably don’t even ‘see’ most of what the gargoyles were doing, which would’ve made it even easier to ‘imagine’ his friends’ actions.
11:32 "The resemblance markedly is there!" No it's not! Queen Iduna has brown hair, whereas Tarzan's Mother had red hair. King Agnarr has blonde hair, whereas Tarzan's father has brown! Iduna and Tz'sM do not have the same face shape, and Agnarr has a convex or wavy nose while Tz'sD has a straight one. Tz'sD also has small ears; Agnarr's are larger. And the King/Queen eyes are more almond-shaped than round. And compare their brow-bones and brow shapes! No, they don't look that similar at all!
I still don't buy the one about Elsa's and Anna's parents also being Tarzan's. I mean, if you think about it, there are 2 major differences. 1) In Tarzan, the ship is going down in a fiery blaze; and in Frozen, the ship goes down via a giant wave with not even a spark to be seen. 2) Tarzan's parents are dressed as lower class citizens, as opposed to Elsa's and Anna's, who are royalty. Not to mention, the parents' facial features are different.
@@CinemaSongscovers exactly, disney just recycles characters, it's cheaper and easier so yea, a lot of times characters end up looking alike or looking exactly the same but maybe an animal or something.. as I said, I do, I think its a bunch of stoners watching the movies and posting what they're thinking is going on, neat ideas, sort of lol, but not what was actually going on
You always have to remember tho.. Disney recycled characters, scenes, names.. it was easier back then... just like why the mice of old always "gloves" because it was easier
I think we should give Andy’s moms some slack. Sure she might of told Andy he could only bring one toy to pizza planet but I doubt she had any bad intentions, she probably didn’t want to risk andy accidentally forgetting one of the toys or loosing them, (it was buzz and woody that weren’t acting like mature adults) kids can become distracted easily especially in restaurants that also boast arcades. In the second movie all she was doing was cleaning out the toys Andy didn’t play with anymore, that’s what my mom used to do whenever i stopped playing with a barbie or bratz doll she would donate them to our local charity shop or to friends of hers with little kids, i very much doubt that if Andy’s mom knew the toys were alive she would throw them away. And if she is Emily then I will admit I do feel a certain way but if I took emotions out of it and looked at it as a neutral party then as horrible as it is, children do grow up they gain new interests and bits of their childhood get left behind in the process.
11:05 Well no, it doesn’t. In Frozen 2 it shows Anna and Elsa’s parents huddled up in the middle of the boat seconds before death. And no, they did not get on the lifeboats. My theory was that they were sleeping when it started, got woken up by screams, and found out all the lifeboats were taken. Or, the bottom of the boat was locked up from the top and they got stuck down in the bottom of the boat.
Honestly, the theory about Gaston being the one who killed Bambis mom doesn't seem accurate because Bambi's mom got killed in the winter, while the deer who was drinking from a pond in Beauty and the Beast was in Spring/Summer. And if Gaston only kills deer for their antlers then he wouldn't have killed her since female deers don't have antlers. (I'm not fully debunking this, it just seems very unlikely)
Another ‚theory‘ for finding Nemo is that Marvin just made up the barracuda attack in his mind because his wife actually ate all of their children because: 1. barracudas don’t eat clownfish 2. the females are actually more stronger and dominant then the males 3. clownfish do have a tendency to cannibalize each other
that toy story one was just dumb, she's not a villain, she doesn't know the toys are alive, that theory makes it seem like she knows their alive but doesn't care shes getting rid of them, while its more like a mother thinking "why the hell do we still have these" cause remember Andy was going to college when the 3rd movie came out, i'm surprised they kept those toys.
Besides Andy's mom *THOUGHT* that the bag with buzz and the crew are garbage. She just wants to help with Andy moving out. It is pretty clear Woody said this, "that was a MISTAKE, Andy's mom thought you were trash."
It is somewhat killed by Frozen 2. Tarzan takes place in Africa. For the theory to hold, Arendelle would have to be on Earth as well, and by geography, it would probably be up by Sweden. In Frozen 2, the parents' ship is found, and its NOT south, but north of Arendelle. So, for the theory to hold, they would have had to get to the lifeboat, and DRIFT south, past England, France, Spain, and the northern half of Africa, all without getting close enough to row to shore, while also not dying of dehydration or starving during that time.
but now the new movie is out and they went to the parents shipwreck and the parents are hugging in it, they cant be the mom and dad and the mom clearly wasn't pregnant when she got on the boat, the new Frozen movie debugged the relationship with Tarzan and Frozen sadly
My biggest problem with the Aladdin theory is that series has a crossover with Hercules. So unless the apocalypse reset everything, and history including mythology started to repeat itself. This Aladdin theory fails, remember genie has powerful cosmic powers maybe one of them can let him see into the future
They debunked the frozen/Tarzan theory after frozen 2 and so did the creators although they said it was creative. The little mermaid theory was also debunked as the timelines and when the movies were made didn’t match up. I did like the theories though.
The theory that Quasimodo is imagining the gargoyles wouldn't make sense because at the end of the movie, they are seen interacting with the bricks and dropping them on the guards. Also, the creators said they wanted to leave it ambiguous if the gargoyles were real or not.
last theory is wrong Female mule deer or white tailed deer don't have antlers so there would be no reason for a trophy hunter like Gaston to kill the doe. Bambie father on the other hand would be #1 Gaston's hit list not his mother
@@Orto-jj2di it would be a NO unless Gaston was feeding his starving family witch he wasn't again their would be no reason for him to shoot a doe much less a doe with a fawn. Bambies Dad is a 10-12 point buck he would be on any hunters radar Gaston's included
@@redschafer7804 huh now that you mention his dad, what if gaston was hunting him instead but ran into bambi and his mom? Plus birds gaston shot in beauty and beast were quite same as in bambi
@@Orto-jj2di birds are hunted in a different manner then deer due to the fact that its hard to tell the difference between the genders when the bird is in flght it really wouldn't matter if they where the same or if it was another easter egg hunters usually want the bucks because they are bigger and have more meat on them. again Doe with fawn normally is a no go because if you kill mom then the baby usually winds up starving to death. Bambi isn't show to be fully mature when his mother dies so he might have survived but he wouldn't have. I just don't see Gaston killing Bambies mom. its a nice Easter egg but in theory it just doesn't pan out for me as some one who knows deer hunters it just doesn't make logical sense.
@@redschafer7804 perhaps but gaston doesn't exactly care if animal he kills fights back or not, if that's what you mean. You are right but let's think about it, in many other adaptations gaston is a soldier who fought in war and travels around, do you think its possible he'd be a soldier once in this adaptation too?
*Buzz* Incorrect on the Christoff theory. Christoff and Sven are friends since They we’re both young; so that means that Sven had already lost his parents before Christoff wore those clothes as an adult.
I think it’s a little far fetched to call Andy’s mother a villain for not allowing her kid to bring every toy he owns outside the house🙄. How many parents/grandparents/aunties/uncles have told a child “no, you cant take 10 Barbies, baby dolls, race cars, GI Joes with us.?” Then she gets blamed for growing up? Andy grew up and out grew his toys too! It’s a part of life. You may keep a few very sentimental things from your childhood but NOBODY keeps EVERYTHING!
@@bluefirewolf1991 oh? So did Anna and Elsa's parents Die going to look for Atahollan, or on Tarzan's island to the jaguar? because if those are the same people in those movies then there's now a death-inconsistency between Tarzan and Frozen 2
Well, theorizing is fun and all, but none of them can be truly confirmed, but pretty much dismissed. More than anything, this just looks like people being morbid.
Lol that theory about Andy's mom is absolute horse dung first off in Jessie's montage when you see the color of Emily's hair it is clearly red where as if you look at Andy's mom she clearly has blonde hair. And the reason that Andy's mom made the rule about only bringing one toy to pizza planet is because young children at Andy's age in the first movie tend to misplace toys if they bring more than one into a public place I speak from experience because when I was ten years old if I brought two or more toys with me to places I usually ended up losing one of them if not more which usually meant my parents had to replace them
She could've dyed her hair, and also I don't think that she's intentionally causing harm. I mean, it's what most moms would do and they don't know the toys are alive.
@@margalothegreat_hams To dye your hear from red to blonde would require a lot of. Peroxide (bleach) and would probably darn near burn almost all the hair off or severely damage the hair along with damaging the scalp I speak from personal experience my sister and I wanted to try a new colorful hair dye but it wouldn't work with our dark hair so we went to a salon that would bleach our hair so we could dye our hair and it was the worse mistake of our lives the pain of bleaching our hair is an experience I would never repeat even for a million dollars.
@@Fantasygirl2001 Bleaching ones hair can be safe and cause little damage if you’re doing it over several trips, if you bleach your hair from brown to blonde in just one trip, then yeah, your hair is going to be trashed.
Toy Story: How dare Andy’s mom limit her son to one toy to prevent them getting lost and decluttering her sons room. We see in the movie that she is a single mom, so she may be having a yard sale to raise money to help fund her and her two young kids. Andy clearly doesn’t care about these toys anymore so it is reasonable that she would want to declutter and get rid of them. Beauty and the Beast- It is reasonable, I think it is reasonable to assume that there is more than one deer and flock of geese in the world.
I have heard all of these theories but the Hunchback one. Slso i thing you mean the older ice harvesters killed Sven's parents because Kirstof was every young at the start of Frozen but was already with Sven
About Gaston killing Bambi's mother. Ah yes Gaston is so powerful that he can transport himself into the Future and cross the seas into California from France. About Kristoph killing Sven's parents, first off he is a Sameer (If I wrote it right), which is a native people here in Sweden, Norway and Finland. They culture is pretty much based around raindeer, they get milk, fur, and meat from them, while still having a great companionship with them. They both help each other. It is just natural for them to have raindeer coats, and fur. Elsa and Anna's parents being the same as Tarzan's parents. We only go forward in history by like 200 years, change from the Scandinavian countries to England, and have a sailing disaster that pretty much takes place on the other side of the world.
12:50 the last theory no wrong guns see the gun that killed Bamdie's mom I think it's close the the 20th century while the curved out breale of the gun is an very old gun is not in use no more unless he can time travel there's no way it can work
I agree that it wasn't Gaston. I did post a comment explaining that the time of year/area wasn't correct. It was winter when she was hunted by the unnamed hunter, while Beauty and the beast seemed to show that it was at least early to mid fall when the deer was shown drinking from a stream. So even if the gun could still be disproven, the time of year disproves it.
@@Orto-jj2di Yes, but the scene showing the deer at the stream doesn't show snow. So it is more than likely that Gaston had been hunting during that time. Winter isn't much for hunting since most animals are in hibernation, and deer are very very rarely seen during the winter regardless.
If you read the original Peter Pan, you’ll learn that Peter Pan is far from an angel. He cuts and kills the kids who seem to be growing older/bigger than him.
I can disprove two of these 1st off Kristoff was with his reindeer since he was a child so it was more than likely that his dad that killed the parents of the reindeer 2nd Andy's mom isn't the real villain She doesn't know about the secret life of buzz and woody and she was just doing normal stuff like most moms would do
Me sees the sub title Peter Pan is the angel of death Me : once upon a time beat you to this theory *in once upon a time Peter Pan is the bad guy* Me proceeds to watch it : nvm
The problem with the Andy's mom is Emily theory can't be correct for one reason.... Emily has red hair in case no one noticed her braid flying around. Meanwhile Andy's mom, is dirty blonde.
Kristoff could not have killed Sven's parents, because at the beginning of Frozen, we see a young Kristoff and Sven. Kristoff would have been too you g to kill Sven's parents.
how can Tarzan's parents be Anna and Elsa's parents. Elsa and Anna are Norwegian making their parents also Norwegian, but Tarzan's parents were British making Tarzan British not Norwegian.
The Bambi theory is easily disproven. Bambi is likely a white-tailed deer in the Disney version. This can be implied given that he lives with a skunk (Flower), which is an animal exclusive to the Americas. Gaston lives in France. The doe at the beginning of Beauty and the Beast is probably a roe deer, a native species so it can't be Bambi's mother. So unless Gaston travelled to America to hunt, he couldn't have killed Bambi's mom. What's interesting to note though is that in the original source material for Bambi, the setting was actually in Europe and Bambi was actually supposed to be a roe deer.
for the frozen one, Christoff is a Saami deer herder, Saami herd deer and use every part of the deer body including eating the meat, making the fur into clothes boots etc
Frozen 2 it shows how Anna and Elsa’s parents died I kinda got a little bit of the titanic vibe from it :/ considering most ships end up sinking during storms they couldn’t have possibly died by a leopard because they had never made it to land
That is unlikely because first off does (female deers) do not have antlers only bucks have antlers also the scene with Bambi's mother being shot was a winter scene and the opening of beauty and the beast is set between autumn and winter
But tbh, it's the only one that makes at least a little sense. There's little scenes that can be seen as evidence while the other theories are literally pulled out of nowhere.
I don’t have a ton of time so I’m just gonna say what I want, pls don’t be bothered by how it might sound as it’s not meant to be offensive. Ariel can’t be in neverland, there is no kingdom’s (at all) in neverland, so her mom must have been killed by ordinary pirates. Kristoff (I don’t know if that’s how you spell his name) is a reindeer herder, reindeer die, both of natural and unnatural causes (freezing would not have been uncommon in this period, not to mention starving, after all if people don’t have enough to eat they can’t possibly feed their reindeer). Killing a newborn deer’s mother would be unlikely to happen, it’s more likely that if the mother did die a doll substitute of her fur or use her feces to cover another reindeer would be used in order to make the reindeer calf eat from them, as it would otherwise likely refuse to eat at all. (Don’t mention brainwashing the poor calf just getting it to eat would be a challenge all on its own). But even if that may be the case do consider that reindeer fur it very warm and in the mountains when it’s snowing being warm can safe your life, using a the fur of a dead reindeer is not a bad thing. The main reason why animal rights people are against using the fur of animals is because due to the fact that animals would largely be killed before their time in order to provide said fur, which is truly tragic. But even if kristoff is wearing reindeer fur that would probably not bother Sven as he has known him for a long time, lots of people around the world use reindeer fur while also herding reindeer. The reindeer may not fully trust them but they don’t see other reindeer’s fur on them and automatically categorize them as friend or foe. They’re just not that stupid.
Have you ever noticed anything in Tarzan and frozen? In Tarzan, the mother’s hair is red, and in Frozen, Queen Iduna has dark brown hair. You forgot the very difference between them.
There is a dark theory that Peter Pan kidnapped those children and Captain Hook was actually trying to save them and take them home to their parents. It makes a little sense. Why else would Peter Pan keep all those children locked in a house all day? Why else, after so many years of not having his hand(because Peter cut it off), would Hook still be interested in killing Peter Pan? AND WHY THE FRICK ELSE WOULD A FRICKING CHILD CUT SOMEONE'S HAND OFF?!? THAT'S WAY OVERKILL AND SUPER VIOLENT EVEN WITH THE BEST INTENTIONS IN MIND! Thank for reading my rant, if you got this far...
So the thing with Tarzan was confirmed I know that. The thing with Gaston I think was also confirmed? I think. And the thing with Kristoff is not right since they were both really young. I think Sven was lost or something and Kristoff found him, and Kristoff I think was an Orphan as well.
Problem is with 1# theory is because when Bambi’s mom was killed it was winter but wit h the deer in beauty and the beast it’s summer or spring so it can’t be the same deer
The thing about the Kristoff theory is I don't think he killed the reindeer parents I like to believe he more inherited them from hunters and what I believe to be his family
Here's a really cool one about up if you re-watch the beginning of the movie when he was younger he had black hair when she chubby and when he met her and they got pregnant they miscarried that could be their kid leading him to heaven
Anna and Elsa's parents are not Tarzan's. There was no firearms or cannons in Frozen, and Tarzan has metallic case ammo, as well as steam ships. Which means Tarzan has to take place in the late 1800's.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
"Kristoph killed Sven's parents". Right. So a 7 year old killed two adult reindeer and made their fur into his clothing. Seriously people, we see the two were already best friends since super young. And they were apart of a group of humans. The only morbid thing about that movie is that they were kidnapped and adopted by the trolls.
I was about to say this as well. The two were kids together. How is a 7 year old going to kill 2 adult reindeer? That seems extremely unlikely to me
@@eligbell3542 I'd say maybe his parents did it, but I don't think Kristof has parents. I also doubt Sven's parents would be the ones killed anyhow. The group likely raised two types of Reigndeer. Working and resources. So if Sven is a worker, it is more than likely that his parents were also workers. They would only be used for clothing if they were sick and couldn't work, but their meat would be unusable.
yeah like a 7 year old could never kill to dears and then make a big jacket
@@amberlyrane8006 see that makes a lot more sense than a 7 year old killing 2 adult deer. Also since the two knew each other at a young age. It’s probably a completely different reindeer pelt by now
@@aroha-um2eq a 7 year old that was seen at the very beginning of the film with a baby Sven and they were already best buds. If 7 year old Kristof had some how managed to kill the father, a male reindeer which can be dangerous, and the mother, baby Sven would be very hesitant to be around Kristof at first because his parents were recently killed. The only way that theory works is if Kristof killed them when Sven was younger but that would also put Kristof younger, making it even harder for a literal child to kill two adult deer. Plus Kristof could barely get a block of ice in the opening scene. How is he going to kill 2 reindeer? It’s an ok theory but it completely disregards the very beginning of the movie.
So, idea that the person came up with is a cool concept but Up, was actually a slightly true story. I forget where it was, New York I'm pretty sure, but there was a businessman that bought a block, paid everyone to move out of their houses but 1 lady, who had been in the house since her husband built it, did not want to sell, he ended up befriending the lady, helping her with her yard work and house work, just being an all around good guy, and when she passed, she left it to him in her will and instead of tearing the house down, he put a crap ton of balloons out of the chimney (just like in the movie) in her memory and kept the house.. it's actually a super sad but incredibly awesome story
@Anne Hessler I know it's so cool! And I just absolutely love that the guy could've been a butthead and tear it down after she died but didn't, that shows honor, there's not enough honor in the world anymore
The whole frozen with Anna and Elsa’s parents being Tarzan parents can be completely disproven with the fact that Tarzan’s parents raised up the Union Jack on their Treehouse which for those who might not know the Union Jack is the British flag.
Well there we go, disproven! Not to mention in the Sequel we actually see the Parents brace each other as the ship is flooded. They clearly drowned.
yea i was about to say the whole elsa and anna being sisters to tarzan theory is false because in frozen two it is confirmed that they drowned cuz they found their boat in the enchanted forest
Another point that disproves it is that in Tarzan, His parents escape the boat WITH A YOUNG CHILD. When Anna and Elsa's parents leave, they have no child, nor is the mom pregnant. Their trip also did not take months, merely days...
Plus, quite frankly, if anyone READS Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Tarzan's parents were British aristocracy - Lord and Lady Greystoke. They were not the King and Queen of any nordic country.
@@ravenartistofficial yeah
In the Aladdin game on a portable there is what looks like and unactivated Nuke in the background of a level
And there's an episode of the TV series where there is a time vortex and everyone is flung into the past and 'future' of Agrabah. Maybe all of the locations were actually past- which would explain how Abis Maal and his ancestor knew how to use the weapons.
In the Saga Genesis version you can see a stop sign partially buried in the sand
It takes place after ww3
I noticed that too it's in the nes version
😲😲😲😲😲😲😲😲
Everyone seems to think it was Gaston who killed Bambi's mother, but I always thought Bambi took place somewhere in North America due to Bambi's being a white-tailed deer and the total lack of European accents, which could mean it was actually Amos Slade from The Fox and the Hound who killed Bambi's mom instead of Gaston.
On top of it there is a scene in Bambi where he sees cat head lights and it's and old blue station wagon way to modern for beauty and the beast
The original book took place in Germany. Gaston is French. There was no skunk in the book either; Disney stuck in North American animals to appeal to his audience.
That makes a bit more sense. Although, the truck scene in The Fox and The Hound in which Amos and Copper return from their hunting trip seems to be filled with mostly fox fur.
Same here.
Bambi takes place in Arrowhead California in rough 1900s.
Where Beauty and the Beast, takes place in France around 1700s-1800s (At most 1880).
If Gaston’s antler decoration is what led fans to believe he killed Bambi’s mother then that makes no sense because female deer (Doe) doesn’t have antlers.
Yeah, reindeer are the only deer that the females have antlers. Bambi and his mother were at first Roe deer that they changed at the last minute to white-tailed deer. Which now gives it the location of North America.
Actually Peter pan's story was told to children in the war so that they wouldn't be afraid of death.
So it's kind of true that Peter pan can be seen as the angel of death. If you follow the actual use of the story for which it has been originally created.
Well we can disprove the bambi's mother theory as when his mother was killed by the unnamed hunter, it was still winter with plenty of snow on the ground. The scene in Beauty and the Beast that shows a deer drinking from a stream looks to be in the middle of or the beginning of fall. In addition, Bambi and his mother was grazing on some small patch of grass that was poking through snow....not near a stream. It was a good theory, but unfortunately it was not Gaston that had killed Bambi's mother.
Also, I don't know if this is wrong or not, but in The Jungle Book there was one scene where Shere Khan was trying to pounce on a female deer, could that female deer be Bambi's mother?
@@jennawebb4225 No, considering that Bambi's mother was specifically killed by a hunter as you hear a gunshot specifically offscreen.
There's also the huge geographical difference. Bambi is clearly a white-tailed deer, which are endemic to North America, while Gaston and the entire cast of Beauty and the Beast are in France. The closest thing to Bambi in that area would've been a Fallow deer or Bambi's original concept, a Roe deer
There are also no skunks in europe.
and white tail deer does (girls) have no antlers
8:35 no I'm sorry, you SEE Sven and Kristoff together at the very begining of the movie during the opening and add to that Kristoff is WAY too young in that scene to be killing anything much less Sven's parents. so that theory is just plain nonsense
I think with the frozen one I think Kristof is using Sven fur…. Like how you can get the fleece off lambs and you don’t have to kill them
Also Kristof was like, 7 or 8 in the beginning scene and we can see him with baby Sven. So he also could not have murdered Sven's parents for their fur.
I don't think that theory makes much sense considering Kristoff was a small child who would be incapable of kill two giant reindeer. What I think would make more sense would be how both ended up orphans. Maybe Kristoff's parents hunted reindeer and happened to be hunting Sven's and resulting in them killing each other. Leaving Kristoff and Sven alone in the woods, where the two eventually met up and relied on each other for survival until being found by the ice men in the beginning of the movie. That would explain their extremely close bond and why Kristoff thinks Sven can talk to him. Kristoff probably just bought his outfit.
@@teonnakatz ohhhh I like that one a lot and yeah I’m movie they met young and Kristof had hard time holding ice lol how could he kill grown deer
that is not how fur works
Also he could have bought the fur
Basically some of the Theories in a nutshell:
*All the characters are dead,It's all in there head, or it takes place in a bad future.*
I always thought the gargoyals were Quasimodo's hallucinations.
I suppose you could say that, but then, how would you explain Hugo being able to actually hit one of the soldiers on the head as they were climbing up the ladders?
Frollo basically confirms that when he catches Quasimodo talking to them in at least the stage musical (disney version stage musical). I can't remember if the film does or not.
but Esmeralda's goat can see them lol
I always thought that Quasimodo's gargoyle friends were variations of Goliath and his group.
@@CinemaSongscovers Simple daydreams can get quite vivid the longer they are indulged, so I bet hallucinations can also become extremely interactive, especially ones that have been maintained for up-to twenty years. Also, keep in mind that during all the fighting, there was a ton of stuff going on in the background. Molten rock, falling debris (like when Frolo fell), and even a huge angry mob that could’ve easily contributed to why the soldiers actually fell. Heck they might’ve just tripped on their own, it’s not like they were in that great of shape. Not to mention, Quasi probably don’t even ‘see’ most of what the gargoyles were doing, which would’ve made it even easier to ‘imagine’ his friends’ actions.
11:32 "The resemblance markedly is there!" No it's not! Queen Iduna has brown hair, whereas Tarzan's Mother had red hair. King Agnarr has blonde hair, whereas Tarzan's father has brown! Iduna and Tz'sM do not have the same face shape, and Agnarr has a convex or wavy nose while Tz'sD has a straight one. Tz'sD also has small ears; Agnarr's are larger. And the King/Queen eyes are more almond-shaped than round. And compare their brow-bones and brow shapes! No, they don't look that similar at all!
Thank you. Everyone who talks about this theory says that the parents look alike. I don’t see it at all. They are not the same people.
Frozen 2 also cleared this theory up. It's a closed and shut case so it's not a theory anymore.
If you look at frozen one it shows there parents before the died of the ship sinking
pretty sure that Genie meant 10,000 years of being in the lamp was being very uncomfortable for him giving him a such a crick in the neck
I have to say... all of these just sound like a stoner watching these and posting on reddit what they're thinking..
I still don't buy the one about Elsa's and Anna's parents also being Tarzan's. I mean, if you think about it, there are 2 major differences.
1) In Tarzan, the ship is going down in a fiery blaze; and in Frozen, the ship goes down via a giant wave with not even a spark to be seen.
2) Tarzan's parents are dressed as lower class citizens, as opposed to Elsa's and Anna's, who are royalty.
Not to mention, the parents' facial features are different.
@@CinemaSongscovers exactly, disney just recycles characters, it's cheaper and easier so yea, a lot of times characters end up looking alike or looking exactly the same but maybe an animal or something.. as I said, I do, I think its a bunch of stoners watching the movies and posting what they're thinking is going on, neat ideas, sort of lol, but not what was actually going on
Here's another theory he shaves his fur in the summer and makes winter coats out of it
Thank you
You don't shave fur. You have to remove the entire hide--meaning skin and all, as a whole.
You always have to remember tho.. Disney recycled characters, scenes, names.. it was easier back then... just like why the mice of old always "gloves" because it was easier
The Andy's mom one is the most ridiculous lol
Ridiculous that she's the villain, absolutely. But that she might have been the original owner of Jessy has enough merit to it to be plausible.
I think we should give Andy’s moms some slack.
Sure she might of told Andy he could only bring one toy to pizza planet but I doubt she had any bad intentions, she probably didn’t want to risk andy accidentally forgetting one of the toys or loosing them, (it was buzz and woody that weren’t acting like mature adults) kids can become distracted easily especially in restaurants that also boast arcades.
In the second movie all she was doing was cleaning out the toys Andy didn’t play with anymore, that’s what my mom used to do whenever i stopped playing with a barbie or bratz doll she would donate them to our local charity shop or to friends of hers with little kids, i very much doubt that if Andy’s mom knew the toys were alive she would throw them away.
And if she is Emily then I will admit I do feel a certain way but if I took emotions out of it and looked at it as a neutral party then as horrible as it is, children do grow up they gain new interests and bits of their childhood get left behind in the process.
@@strongblade Jesse's owners name was Emily. Andys moms name is Jennifer. So no as much as I loved that theory, it's dead 2
11:05
Well no, it doesn’t. In Frozen 2 it shows Anna and Elsa’s parents huddled up in the middle of the boat seconds before death.
And no, they did not get on the lifeboats. My theory was that they were sleeping when it started, got woken up by screams, and found out all the lifeboats were taken. Or, the bottom of the boat was locked up from the top and they got stuck down in the bottom of the boat.
In the book Peter pan killed the lost boys that grew up.
True. The book is pretty morbid.
Carl being dead is not sad, it’s beautiful !!!!! He wasn’t happy here, he went home to Ellie 💛
Honestly, the theory about Gaston being the one who killed Bambis mom doesn't seem accurate because Bambi's mom got killed in the winter, while the deer who was drinking from a pond in Beauty and the Beast was in Spring/Summer. And if Gaston only kills deer for their antlers then he wouldn't have killed her since female deers don't have antlers.
(I'm not fully debunking this, it just seems very unlikely)
Dory has "Short-term memory problems" not amnesia: there's a difference.
Another ‚theory‘ for finding Nemo is that Marvin just made up the barracuda attack in his mind because his wife actually ate all of their children because:
1. barracudas don’t eat clownfish
2. the females are actually more stronger and dominant then the males
3. clownfish do have a tendency to cannibalize each other
Good god
@@lukeperry3454 yep
Wow that's dark
Did the mom actually get eaten or just leave Martian with the last egg in other words abondond them?
@@lukeperry3454 another thing is clown fish are like frogs and can change their gender if one gender is not present when it's mating time
that toy story one was just dumb, she's not a villain, she doesn't know the toys are alive, that theory makes it seem like she knows their alive but doesn't care shes getting rid of them, while its more like a mother thinking "why the hell do we still have these" cause remember Andy was going to college when the 3rd movie came out, i'm surprised they kept those toys.
Besides Andy's mom *THOUGHT* that the bag with buzz and the crew are garbage. She just wants to help with Andy moving out. It is pretty clear Woody said this, "that was a MISTAKE, Andy's mom thought you were trash."
I never agreed with the Frozen/Tarazan crossover theory.
It is somewhat killed by Frozen 2.
Tarzan takes place in Africa. For the theory to hold, Arendelle would have to be on Earth as well, and by geography, it would probably be up by Sweden.
In Frozen 2, the parents' ship is found, and its NOT south, but north of Arendelle.
So, for the theory to hold, they would have had to get to the lifeboat, and DRIFT south, past England, France, Spain, and the northern half of Africa, all without getting close enough to row to shore, while also not dying of dehydration or starving during that time.
but now the new movie is out and they went to the parents shipwreck and the parents are hugging in it, they cant be the mom and dad and the mom clearly wasn't pregnant when she got on the boat, the new Frozen movie debugged the relationship with Tarzan and Frozen sadly
@@firewaterconnect2442 I was actually happy about it cause I honestly didn't think the two sets of parents looked alike
@@MillieBlackRose they dud looked alike but thqts your opinion i guess
That theory is still alive but retconned after Frozen 2
1:16 Wait, Carl never did this in the movie.
My biggest problem with the Aladdin theory is that series has a crossover with Hercules. So unless the apocalypse reset everything, and history including mythology started to repeat itself. This Aladdin theory fails, remember genie has powerful cosmic powers maybe one of them can let him see into the future
Or maybe genie exists across multiple timeliness at the same time because... magic lol
@@Theblondebass1 I mean at the end of the first one he is wearing a Goofy visor and a tropical-styled shirt
"russel is an angel"
Me: say, what now?!
Andy's mom: *Breathing and doing normal things around the house*
Deluxe:"This woman is super negligent! She's the literal devil!"
8:09 this part of theory would be so sad to think about had we not literally seen Sven and Kristoff meet in the first 5 minutes of the movie
They debunked the frozen/Tarzan theory after frozen 2 and so did the creators although they said it was creative.
The little mermaid theory was also debunked as the timelines and when the movies were made didn’t match up. I did like the theories though.
The theory that Quasimodo is imagining the gargoyles wouldn't make sense because at the end of the movie, they are seen interacting with the bricks and dropping them on the guards. Also, the creators said they wanted to leave it ambiguous if the gargoyles were real or not.
is it possible the hunter from The Fox and The Hound killed Bambis mother??
A Reindeers lifespan is much shorter than Kristofs canon age, there for, the fur is actually past Svens.
last theory is wrong Female mule deer or white tailed deer don't have antlers so there would be no reason for a trophy hunter like Gaston to kill the doe. Bambie father on the other hand would be #1 Gaston's hit list not his mother
Maybe maybe not
@@Orto-jj2di it would be a NO unless Gaston was feeding his starving family witch he wasn't again their would be no reason for him to shoot a doe much less a doe with a fawn. Bambies Dad is a 10-12 point buck he would be on any hunters radar Gaston's included
@@redschafer7804 huh now that you mention his dad, what if gaston was hunting him instead but ran into bambi and his mom?
Plus birds gaston shot in beauty and beast were quite same as in bambi
@@Orto-jj2di birds are hunted in a different manner then deer due to the fact that its hard to tell the difference between the genders when the bird is in flght it really wouldn't matter if they where the same or if it was another easter egg hunters usually want the bucks because they are bigger and have more meat on them. again Doe with fawn normally is a no go because if you kill mom then the baby usually winds up starving to death. Bambi isn't show to be fully mature when his mother dies so he might have survived but he wouldn't have. I just don't see Gaston killing Bambies mom. its a nice Easter egg but in theory it just doesn't pan out for me as some one who knows deer hunters it just doesn't make logical sense.
@@redschafer7804 perhaps but gaston doesn't exactly care if animal he kills fights back or not, if that's what you mean.
You are right but let's think about it, in many other adaptations gaston is a soldier who fought in war and travels around, do you think its possible he'd be a soldier once in this adaptation too?
*Buzz* Incorrect on the Christoff theory. Christoff and Sven are friends since They we’re both young; so that means that Sven had already lost his parents before Christoff wore those clothes as an adult.
I think it’s a little far fetched to call Andy’s mother a villain for not allowing her kid to bring every toy he owns outside the house🙄. How many parents/grandparents/aunties/uncles have told a child “no, you cant take 10 Barbies, baby dolls, race cars, GI Joes with us.?” Then she gets blamed for growing up? Andy grew up and out grew his toys too! It’s a part of life. You may keep a few very sentimental things from your childhood but NOBODY keeps EVERYTHING!
Hello Erika
that tarzan/frozen theory was laid to rest in frozen 2! BEFORE DOING STUFF LIK THIS RESEARCH EVERYTHING!
Ariels mom and the mermaid from Peter Pan is not the same mermaid. Ariels mom had green eyes, while the mermaid from Peter Pan had brown eyes.
Different hair style and different shell bra
@@dkf315 Hair style and clothing don’t stay the same over time y’know.
Title: 10 HORRIFIC Disney Theories That Will Forever Change How You View Your Favorite Movies
Me: It won't change my view if I already seen it :P
the Tarzan-Frozen theory is debunked by Frozen 2, sadly. still a great theory tho!
Actually Disney and the creators of frozen did *CONFIRM* that Tarzan *IS* Elsa and Anna's brother
@@bluefirewolf1991 oh? So did Anna and Elsa's parents Die going to look for Atahollan, or on Tarzan's island to the jaguar?
because if those are the same people in those movies then there's now a death-inconsistency between Tarzan and Frozen 2
@@pokefan213 on the island
@@bluefirewolf1991 so then their death in frozen 2 is a lie then?
@@pokefan213 they didn't die in frozen 2 what was shown was them going overboard because of the waves
Well, theorizing is fun and all, but none of them can be truly confirmed, but pretty much dismissed. More than anything, this just looks like people being morbid.
So how was Nemo living in a fish tank in a dentist office part of Marlin’s grief?
Hello Adele
I think the eeriest theory for Finding Nemo is that Merlin wants Nemo safe so they can repopulate
Lol that theory about Andy's mom is absolute horse dung first off in Jessie's montage when you see the color of Emily's hair it is clearly red where as if you look at Andy's mom she clearly has blonde hair. And the reason that Andy's mom made the rule about only bringing one toy to pizza planet is because young children at Andy's age in the first movie tend to misplace toys if they bring more than one into a public place I speak from experience because when I was ten years old if I brought two or more toys with me to places I usually ended up losing one of them if not more which usually meant my parents had to replace them
its just a theory!
She could've dyed her hair, and also I don't think that she's intentionally causing harm. I mean, it's what most moms would do and they don't know the toys are alive.
@@margalothegreat_hams To dye your hear from red to blonde would require a lot of. Peroxide (bleach) and would probably darn near burn almost all the hair off or severely damage the hair along with damaging the scalp I speak from personal experience my sister and I wanted to try a new colorful hair dye but it wouldn't work with our dark hair so we went to a salon that would bleach our hair so we could dye our hair and it was the worse mistake of our lives the pain of bleaching our hair is an experience I would never repeat even for a million dollars.
@@Fantasygirl2001 Bleaching ones hair can be safe and cause little damage if you’re doing it over several trips, if you bleach your hair from brown to blonde in just one trip, then yeah, your hair is going to be trashed.
Some people's hair can change color with age too
My mum loves Up even though she always cries at the start because of how depressing it is.
Toy Story: How dare Andy’s mom limit her son to one toy to prevent them getting lost and decluttering her sons room. We see in the movie that she is a single mom, so she may be having a yard sale to raise money to help fund her and her two young kids. Andy clearly doesn’t care about these toys anymore so it is reasonable that she would want to declutter and get rid of them.
Beauty and the Beast- It is reasonable, I think it is reasonable to assume that there is more than one deer and flock of geese in the world.
I have heard all of these theories but the Hunchback one. Slso i thing you mean the older ice harvesters killed Sven's parents because Kirstof was every young at the start of Frozen but was already with Sven
About Gaston killing Bambi's mother.
Ah yes Gaston is so powerful that he can transport himself into the Future and cross the seas into California from France.
About Kristoph killing Sven's parents, first off he is a Sameer (If I wrote it right), which is a native people here in Sweden, Norway and Finland.
They culture is pretty much based around raindeer, they get milk, fur, and meat from them, while still having a great companionship with them. They both help each other.
It is just natural for them to have raindeer coats, and fur.
Elsa and Anna's parents being the same as Tarzan's parents.
We only go forward in history by like 200 years, change from the Scandinavian countries to England, and have a sailing disaster that pretty much takes place on the other side of the world.
Please tell me I’m not the only one who thought this guy is the voice of the FitnessGram Pacer Test
12:19 wasn't it winter when bambi's mom died? how would it suddenly be spring/summer
the peterpan one is not a theory as its a folks tale its based on and yes it mentions it as its a tale meant to explane the consept of dead to kids
Anna the sixth element because look at the leaves swarming around her!
12:50 the last theory no wrong guns see the gun that killed Bamdie's mom I think it's close the the 20th century while the curved out breale of the gun is an very old gun is not in use no more unless he can time travel there's no way it can work
On that we won't know ever for sure bc he may travel around since he called greatest hunter in world
I agree that it wasn't Gaston. I did post a comment explaining that the time of year/area wasn't correct. It was winter when she was hunted by the unnamed hunter, while Beauty and the beast seemed to show that it was at least early to mid fall when the deer was shown drinking from a stream. So even if the gun could still be disproven, the time of year disproves it.
@@Crazychik96 not sure of that, bc in belles time at castle there was snow
@@Orto-jj2di Yes, but the scene showing the deer at the stream doesn't show snow. So it is more than likely that Gaston had been hunting during that time. Winter isn't much for hunting since most animals are in hibernation, and deer are very very rarely seen during the winter regardless.
@@Crazychik96 huh then it begs the question why bambi and his mom came out during snow time
Kristoff is an ice harvester, not a reindeer herder 🧐
Hello Jessie
Great vid new sub 👍🏾
If you read the original Peter Pan, you’ll learn that Peter Pan is far from an angel. He cuts and kills the kids who seem to be growing older/bigger than him.
I can disprove two of these
1st off Kristoff was with his reindeer since he was a child so it was more than likely that his dad that killed the parents of the reindeer
2nd Andy's mom isn't the real villain
She doesn't know about the secret life of buzz and woody and she was just doing normal stuff like most moms would do
The Gaston and Bambi mom would have taken place during the winter not spring like it shows in the image you have on this video.
That makes more sense now we get to see what's happening around the movies up
There is a theory that Anna and Elsa’s parents were on their way to Repunzel and Flynn’s wedding.
11:58 anyone notice Bambi’s tail is missing?
Me sees the sub title Peter Pan is the angel of death
Me : once upon a time beat you to this theory
*in once upon a time Peter Pan is the bad guy*
Me proceeds to watch it : nvm
The gargoyle theory can be dismissed as the sequel (yes the horrible sequel) quisemodos girlfriend sees the gargoyles as well as jolly the goat
The Tarzan Theory was disproven when they found their parents ship in the second movie
The problem with the Andy's mom is Emily theory can't be correct for one reason.... Emily has red hair in case no one noticed her braid flying around. Meanwhile Andy's mom, is dirty blonde.
Hair dye or natural hair color change with age
Kristoff could not have killed Sven's parents, because at the beginning of Frozen, we see a young Kristoff and Sven. Kristoff would have been too you g to kill Sven's parents.
I think that kristoff’s parent killed Sven’s parents and then gave Sven to Krisoff
how can Tarzan's parents be Anna and Elsa's parents. Elsa and Anna are Norwegian making their parents also Norwegian, but Tarzan's parents were British making Tarzan British not Norwegian.
What if kristoff brushes sphin (I forgot how to spell it) fur a lot so it piles up and he makes clothes out of it? 7:34
The frozen theory was confirmed by Disney creators! Such an amazing connection between the two moves frozen and Tarzan!
Disney/pixar movies :.EVERYBODYS DEAD!
Am I the only one that thinks that Andy’s mom looks like Riley from Inside Out???
10:21 no, the mom was not the first owner because of one key detail. The first owner has brown hair, but the mom has blonde
The Bambi theory is easily disproven. Bambi is likely a white-tailed deer in the Disney version. This can be implied given that he lives with a skunk (Flower), which is an animal exclusive to the Americas. Gaston lives in France. The doe at the beginning of Beauty and the Beast is probably a roe deer, a native species so it can't be Bambi's mother. So unless Gaston travelled to America to hunt, he couldn't have killed Bambi's mom. What's interesting to note though is that in the original source material for Bambi, the setting was actually in Europe and Bambi was actually supposed to be a roe deer.
for the frozen one, Christoff is a Saami deer herder, Saami herd deer and use every part of the deer body including eating the meat, making the fur into clothes boots etc
12:55 Moanas actually dead and the whole movie is about her journey to the after life, Maui is her guardian angel.
Eemmm no he did not kill her, Bambi's mom died in WINTER while that Deer not only looks a bit young it is SUMMER
problem is andys mother has blondish hair emely a bit to the brown red spectrum of hair.
But if she could have bleached it
It's a likely thing that she could've colored it , gingers lose their hair color quickly usually , sometimes in their 30s
She could've easily have bleached it
Being born in 91 i was so lucky to have Disney!
The basis of most of these theories:
*death*
Frozen 2 it shows how Anna and Elsa’s parents died I kinda got a little bit of the titanic vibe from it :/ considering most ships end up sinking during storms they couldn’t have possibly died by a leopard because they had never made it to land
That is unlikely because first off does (female deers) do not have antlers only bucks have antlers also the scene with Bambi's mother being shot was a winter scene and the opening of beauty and the beast is set between autumn and winter
Fun fact about deer that has nothing to do with this:
Male deer shed their antlers in early winter.
Death of Bambi's mom was near the end of winter
lol the post apocalyptic aladdin is reading into it too much.
But tbh, it's the only one that makes at least a little sense. There's little scenes that can be seen as evidence while the other theories are literally pulled out of nowhere.
The game is not canon to the movie
I don’t have a ton of time so I’m just gonna say what I want, pls don’t be bothered by how it might sound as it’s not meant to be offensive.
Ariel can’t be in neverland, there is no kingdom’s (at all) in neverland, so her mom must have been killed by ordinary pirates.
Kristoff (I don’t know if that’s how you spell his name) is a reindeer herder, reindeer die, both of natural and unnatural causes (freezing would not have been uncommon in this period, not to mention starving, after all if people don’t have enough to eat they can’t possibly feed their reindeer). Killing a newborn deer’s mother would be unlikely to happen, it’s more likely that if the mother did die a doll substitute of her fur or use her feces to cover another reindeer would be used in order to make the reindeer calf eat from them, as it would otherwise likely refuse to eat at all. (Don’t mention brainwashing the poor calf just getting it to eat would be a challenge all on its own). But even if that may be the case do consider that reindeer fur it very warm and in the mountains when it’s snowing being warm can safe your life, using a the fur of a dead reindeer is not a bad thing. The main reason why animal rights people are against using the fur of animals is because due to the fact that animals would largely be killed before their time in order to provide said fur, which is truly tragic. But even if kristoff is wearing reindeer fur that would probably not bother Sven as he has known him for a long time, lots of people around the world use reindeer fur while also herding reindeer. The reindeer may not fully trust them but they don’t see other reindeer’s fur on them and automatically categorize them as friend or foe. They’re just not that stupid.
I'm not even on number 8 yet, but are these all just death theories
The others I can get on board with but the one about Kristof from frozen I just cant.😫
Hello Sarah
Have you ever noticed anything in Tarzan and frozen? In Tarzan, the mother’s hair is red, and in Frozen, Queen Iduna has dark brown hair. You forgot the very difference between them.
Tarzan’s mom’s hair is red
The Tarzan theory makes sense and can explain why he can understand animals
Reindeer fur? What about cowboys wearing leather at a cow farm?
There is a dark theory that Peter Pan kidnapped those children and Captain Hook was actually trying to save them and take them home to their parents. It makes a little sense. Why else would Peter Pan keep all those children locked in a house all day? Why else, after so many years of not having his hand(because Peter cut it off), would Hook still be interested in killing Peter Pan? AND WHY THE FRICK ELSE WOULD A FRICKING CHILD CUT SOMEONE'S HAND OFF?!? THAT'S WAY OVERKILL AND SUPER VIOLENT EVEN WITH THE BEST INTENTIONS IN MIND! Thank for reading my rant, if you got this far...
So the thing with Tarzan was confirmed I know that. The thing with Gaston I think was also confirmed? I think. And the thing with Kristoff is not right since they were both really young. I think Sven was lost or something and Kristoff found him, and Kristoff I think was an Orphan as well.
Ive always thought the gargoyles were hallucinations 😂
Problem is with 1# theory is because when Bambi’s mom was killed it was winter but wit h the deer in beauty and the beast it’s summer or spring so it can’t be the same deer
The thing about the Kristoff theory is I don't think he killed the reindeer parents I like to believe he more inherited them from hunters and what I believe to be his family
Plus he was like 7 and super close to Sven, there’s no way a child could kill 2 full grown reindeer.
I thought Peter Pan was just a kidnapper that took kids to a magic youth island.
Here's a really cool one about up if you re-watch the beginning of the movie when he was younger he had black hair when she chubby and when he met her and they got pregnant they miscarried that could be their kid leading him to heaven
Anna and Elsa's parents are not Tarzan's. There was no firearms or cannons in Frozen, and Tarzan has metallic case ammo, as well as steam ships. Which means Tarzan has to take place in the late 1800's.
I knew rustle was an angel but i didn't know he was trying to earn wings