Top 3 Beginner Mistakes in LCA

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 8

  • @jcaya4807
    @jcaya4807 11 месяцев назад

    your explanation is so clear and kind. I checked your book(Korean ver. 2019) and it was so helpful. I hope I can get your second book as well. please consider publishing Korean version of Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus as well. thank you so much, sir.

  • @KCook-yc4dz
    @KCook-yc4dz Год назад

    Hi! Thank you for all these videos on LCAs and LPAs. I'm newer to Mplus and struggling with interpreting the Latent Class Indicator Odds Ratios for the Latent Classes. My results in probabilities scale make sense to me, but then when I look at the odds ratios it seems contradictory. For example, the 3-class model showed the first class had a higher percentage of racial/ethnic minorities, but then the odds ratio comparison of that class to class two, showed that the class 2 had an odds ratio suggesting a 150% increased likelihood of racial/ethnic minority. I would love a video explaining the interpretation of the Latent Class Indicator Odds Ratios for the Latent Classes Mplus output!

    • @QuantFish
      @QuantFish  Год назад

      Thank you very much for the suggestion! I will put this on my to-do list for new videos.
      Best, Christian Geiser

  • @Patrizsche
    @Patrizsche 3 месяца назад

    At the beginning of the video you mention a paper with Monte Carlo simulation in the description, but I don't see it. Is there a link for the paper?

  • @emanalhalal485
    @emanalhalal485 Год назад

    I conducted latent class analysis, but I am not sure about the result. The probabilities of some classes were 1.000 and the p-value is also 1.00. I want to figure out the problem.

  • @rezasetiawan92
    @rezasetiawan92 Месяц назад

    is there possible if i want to classify with just 39 sample? i had a little trouble with my paper because i just want to analyze my division in office that only have 39 people.

    • @QuantFish
      @QuantFish  Месяц назад

      A sample of 39 individuals seems too small for a meaningful LCA.
      Best, Christian Geiser

  • @billking8843
    @billking8843 Год назад

    toll!