Thank you Mr. Bob Gimlin,, You and Roger Patterson have set the BenchMark for all of the researchers in this country!! What a day you had in October of 1967,,,"Priceless" from Ohio👌🍻
It's a shame what he had to go through. I don't get it, if someone thinks that his movie is a hoax good for you, that's not against the law to make such a movie !!!!!!! I ,personally, do believe it's real, but everybody got the right to think what he likes.
he is the man for sure. i was flying to a kiss concert. bob and guy was flying to the ohio bigfoot conference. and i couldnt believe it. bob recognize me from youtube. on the plane. i was going to illinois for the concert. they were connecting flight in chicago to ohio. so they saw me and said lets get photos together when we get off the plane. i could not believe bob knew who i was. as i have worked with cliff and bobo and jeff meldrum has come to see me with cliff when i lived on mt hood for 15 years.
Great interview of a very well-articulated, nice guy. It's so interesting to hear his engaging retelling of what happened and his experiences. I have always felt it unfortunate that we never get to hear Patterson's side of the story--he died from cancer roughly 5 years after the encounter.
Bobs a truthful soul. The man is a Humble and a honest to goodness true mountain man/Cowboy with little Indian to boot! He’s not a liar. Men like Bob are rare in this day and age. The film is Without doubt after examination -all these years by Munn and others to be Sasquatch. MK Davis’s Early work was very good, but MK fell by the wayside ‘attempting to stay in the limelight’ -As time progressed and others began good analysis and research.
If you look deeply into peter caine and look past the comedy and his own mocking of the topic and look past his silly rediculous videos you will learn that peter caine really does have 3 specimens in a walk in freezer....as nuts as that sounds, he dad killed 3 with a 12 gauge birdshot automatic browning in 1953. And had to cut them up to get out of the swamp and fly them on a float plane. You have to look deep to see its not just bullshit, peter does a great job of making 99% of the people laugh and dismiss his own videos and now he finally realizes he went too far in the mockery. Like trumps lies on the election and his anti covid consequences. Peter mocked too hard. On the double right arm video he says half way through, no one in science takes it serious that he has the specimens.
Great video! When are we going to realize we can't place everything in little boxes and pretend we know everything about every subject on this planet..What a gift to have seen a Saquatch in it's home..I hope we never capture one..I love the mystery of just knowing they exist..Very down to earth gentleman..
I've listened to this man's story since I was a kid, he hasn't changed it in any way in the time I've listened to him. I really believe he and Roger saw something that day.
I agree, I've read about the case as a child, and see no reason to doubt its a real creature. Suits still haven't been made as good as the filmed subject, so I doubt 2 cowboys made a better one than Hollywood.
It was so awesome to meet Bob eight years ago and sit and talk with him. I saw there video clip at the movies in 1968. Three years later i had an encounter!! I've believed in sasquatch my whole life and am so grateful alot of other people have too!!😊
I lived deep in the Pacific Northwest and I’ve seen them 3 times and a girlfriend when I was 16 needed to pee bad and she insisted on going far enough that I couldn’t see her go and within 2 minutes of going out behind trees she came back screaming and saying there was a monkey and she was crying. Anyway it made a believer out of her. Me and my best friend would ride in the trees on our BMX bikes down hills and they would watch us and follow us. When I was about 9 years old , one of them killed a horse and later the horses head was in a near by creek and I knew after that , that they kill animals and eat meat but I would never have guessed they would eat a horse ? Now it makes sense but at the time it really scared me, for some reason I thought they eat berries and leaves but after that they scared me. I don’t talk face to face with people about it because they think I’m seeking attention or I’m making it up. Everyone says “it’s a guy in a gorilla suit” It’s pointless to talk to people about it, I pray those people run into one.
19:00 October 1967 was a Friday. He said it was filmed on a Saturday. So that means it was actually filmed October 21 1967. This guy is a legend. Clearly not the first person to see a Sasquatch but without his participation, this film likely would have never happened. Than you Bob.
I believe Bob, and I believe the video actually shows a real bigfoot. Best, most clear video of bigfoot I`ve ever seen. Roger Patterson still swore on his death bed that the video was authentic. To me, the sasquatch that was recorded looks like it was actually embarrassed to be caught out in the open. It wasn`t scared. No reason something that big would be. There could very well have been more of them around. Also, the reaction of the horse tells me that it smelled the sasquatch, and was scared. The horse knew what it was looking at.
I've seen the footage till the end,there are more of them,males,Patty got caught out walking for some reason,also there is a strange light in one the frames!
If this guy is correct and what he witnessed was an estimated 800 lbs,, that means they have to chow down a lot. Two major 'events' happened to me that same year. First, this came out and then, later, a classic 'flying saucer' flew low and slow directly over my house at about 10 PM. At the time, I had an unshielded porch light, so the craft was lit up from my light. Looked to be about 100' in diameter and at an estimated 100' above me. Fifty years later, I can still clearly envision it.
What a wonderful accent Robert has! Such a lovable and sweet personality, such a kind human being! I believe him, and wish him many blessings from the Lord, the Creator of all things!
@@robbywright7591 there are still people who say that it's fake. For real. Just today some dude painted a picture of Roger Patterson living it up. The man died broke in bed from cancer. He said that he was able to give his family a nest egg before he died. I guess that means it's all the greatest hoax in history. Everybody is fooled but him.
Sir I have nothing but the utmost respect for you. I am a 62-year-old man currently in Fort Worth Texas. You sir, have been the most in my opinion important factor, in causing people to wake up to the truth of Bigfoot. With all due respect my hat is off to you!
DONT BE SO GULLIBLE! HES LIEING HIS BUTT OFF OVER AND OVER. THEY'RE PROBABLY ONLY KEEPING THE COMMENTS THAT FIT THEIR NARRATIVE. DONT TRUST WHAT THIS GUY IS SAYING. BOB HEIRONIMUS TOOK MANY POLYGRAPHS AND PASSED SAYING HE WAS IN THE COSTUME. THIS 1967 SHORT FILM WAS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A HOAX.
Doesn't strike me as a man who would want his life to be a big lie. If he'd been on his own without a camera he probably would have kept it to himself. I believe everything he says here is true.
Iazzaboyce he is telling a fabricated lie to cover the fact that he participated in the tracking and murder of Patty and her family, along with Patterson and Renee Dehindon nd John Smith.
Hell of a nice guy. I have spoke to him twice now and I fee l ashamed for the folks in the past(and a few more recently) that gave him and his wife grief. Bob is a genuine, honest, forthright and decent gentleman! 👣👣
I have seen a sasquatch, in rural pa in the early 1990's. What he said about everything happening so fast is what people dont understand. I saw it while mt biking and knew what I was seeing instantly. I watched it for 5 to 10 seconds and from 50 to 100 feet away. I generally only tell my story on line to avoid the people who want to explain that i was mistaken. This guy is telling the truth bc his story has never changed. Lies are hard to remember.
@@jumboslice1514 see bears almost weekly where i live. They stand up but rarely walk, let alone run, on their hind legs. I know what I saw. I cant explain it but I know what I saw.
@@LawnMower_gaming1 thanks and you are correct. I see bears often and at all times of the day. I have never mistaken one for something else. This is why I seldom tell my story except online. I have spent a great deal of my life in the woods of PA, MD, VA, and WV and this was my only bigfoot encounter. Seen some other strange things but bigfoot only once.
hahahahaha...he's got you fooled also huh? He borrowed film equipment, to go into the mountains to make a bigfoot movie, this is FACT. He was broke and needed to make money from it, also fact. Then he just HAPPENS to catch a bigfoot out in the open??...NOT BUYING IT for a second. THEN, the guy who said he was paid to wear a suit for Bob and Roger, passed a lie detector test. Imo, Bob is a fraud and will go to hell for lying.....
@@drew-shourd you need to get your facts, straight dude. Petterson passed the same polygraph test, he made no money and even talked about going hunting for it again with a tranq dart...on his death bed. The suit doesn't exist, the supposed makers have retracted the claim they made the suit in the film. The guy who tried to claim he was in the suit was owed money by Patterson so vowed to discredit him. The superimposed images of the dude in the suit no way match the footage - it goes on and on..,
@@drew-shourd Better do you homework Drew, you shit the bed. There are experts with more degrees than a Thermostat that have PROOF that the creature in the Paterson-Gimlin film is a wild animal, not some idiot in a costume. ruclips.net/video/KILP1CFpUVg/видео.html As Bob said in the beginning of the film, Back in the old days, he and his wife were thought to be kooks because Bob was with Roger when they finally got some film of Bigfoot. For years Bob kept his mouth shut because his wife got so much grief at her job about BF, she was on the verge of divorcing him. I watching the film years ago and thought it was a hoax too. I have spent all of my spare time over the last 40 years camping, hiking, backpacking in state forests and game lands. I have NEVER seen, smelled, or saw tracks of anything that could have been bigfoot. But I spent most of my life living in the NE US. I never spent any time in the Pacific Northwest. Its a different ball game. I have been to the Rockie Mts. but not for extended periods of time, so I don't have a dog in the fight. Humans have different bone structure than BIG FOOT. Its an animal. ruclips.net/video/MKUwdHex1Zs/видео.html
@@johnadams5489 Experts? Laughable. There is a reason no credible scientist or academician believes in the bigfoot myth.....no freaking credible evidence. And those that do, have a financial stake in keeping you rubes dumb and believing.
Drew Shourd LOL you think they had monkey suits that looked that good back then? They hardly have em in 2019!.. watch the breakdown analysis on this video you can clearly see the muscle movement under the skin and the fact it has breasts.. or just do a google search for “man in ape suit” and you’ll see even the best one looks completely fake.. now consider this was 1967 and how it so effortlessly walks thru a dry river bed. Whatever that was it wasn’t a man in a suit, that’s just the easiest answer for people who don’t want to think that there’s an undiscovered animal that the mighty white man hasn’t discovered.. people like you said the same thing about the giant squid and mountain gorilla only to be proven WRONG!.. sorry but if yer intelligent enough, you can clearly see it cant be a suit.. and if it was, it was the best suit in the world and woulda been millions.. nobody has ever produced the actual suit either.. there have been a few tards who claimed to have been the man “in the suit” too 😂. Open yer eyes man. It’s really not that hard to conceive of. I know for a FACT these things exist and couldn’t care less what the ignorant say because their opinions are illformed
Glad I saw this. The man is 100% believable. If you have ever seen something so rare and unexpected, it is a mix of emotions that you have to process and then try to convey to others. I know this first hand. I saw something in Gettysburg military park on a rainy evening well after sundown. My wife and I were parked at the base of Little Round Top. And we both saw a ball of light come up out of the ground about 2 feet off the ground. It moved to the left, then back to the right, went back to center, and closed down as it went back into the ground. She was really shook up and started to cry, and I was just in shock and almost disbelief as to what had just happened. I have always been careful who I told this too, because you know peoples first reaction is to not believe you. Just like this man says..."I know what I saw". I believe him.
@@jorgejiminez-rk1uuBro I truly believe You. You tell it so well "and thats just in text form" When these things happen, they happen so fast and so unexpected You barely have time to stop and record or the thought to record because your shook. At least in its been that way for me when Ive seen things.
Interesting to have found this comment. I am a natural skeptic of most things “supernatural” I didn’t believe in ghosts until I had an experience in Gettysburg PA that to this day I cannot explain in any rational manner.
I saw a ball move through the house about 5.5 feet above the floor. It barely cast light onto surfaces. It couldn't cast shadow since it couldnt cast light, but it did glow with a tight feathered edge and it was visible light to my and my ex's eyes. Amazing, pure white visible light like a street light but didn't light the wall hardly at all. About 10-13 inches in diameter.
@@SensibleChuckle People say things like this are lightning....I don't think its that at all. This is some form of coalesced energy. Just speaking for what I saw, I 100% believe that was the spiritual energy of a person/spirit who is attached to that spot. No doubt, the spot their life ended.
It’s why I lead to Bigfoot being not real, you’re telling me in 50 years we haven’t gotten anything even close to this footage? Something doesn’t add up.
that's because it's a fraud. With the fact that literally EVERYONE has a camera in their pocket now, this is still the best footage? And you don't find that to be suspicious? Granted, that doesn't prove this isn't real... but it certainly makes his existence suspect.
Look he is a human like the rest of us. Humans lie, steal and kill without any remorse. There is nothing like this sort of people don't do this or that. You will find in each communities good and bad people and everything in between. And all of us lie each day many times. It starts with wishing your boss a good morning while you would love to kick him into the face. Get my point. Plus it's possible he did not know anything while his dead partner organized everything and found a actor to waer the suite.
We have lost men of his character and caliber in this country. Thank you for reminding me and the future youth of when we were a great country. P&G film along with your confirmation is all I need to believe. truth is in your eyes and voice. God Bless and respect.
She was absolutely amazing, wasn't she? I wonder if she's still alive? If not, I hope her children and grandchildren are still up there in Bluff Creek, living peacefully. (Yet never aware of how their matriarch changed history.)
Bob is a grand old man with the alert mind of a 40 or 50- year- old individual, how could anyone doubt his story, he tells it with obvious honesty, He saw what he says he saw, no doubt about it, a living legend.
@Garrett Kjellberg Roger patterson had taken lie detector test even he passed the test...Bob H is a lier ...the reason they coud not recreate the suit is because they lied....
@jowhit There is literally thousands of accounts throughout history. Do a little research. A couple resources. MK Davis. Greenwave2010 did a breakdown on frame 350 of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Thinkerthunker did another analysis. If you want to understand the topic put a little effort in. I really don’t think the majority of people really care what you think. You believe what you want but if you are interested in knowing there is more information out there than you could dissect in your lifetime on this subject.
At 21:16, the way hes looking to the side as he describes what he saw with his own eyes, and the way he says he saw so much more of everything and of the muscle movement than what his friend captured on film sounded very convincing he's telling the truth that he actually saw it in person, and it was a real big foot or primitive woman or very hairy man that he saw walking about by chance.
Well if he was trying to calm his horse said it was jumping around how could he see any details he said at the time he didn't know it was a female he found out later. How could he see muscle detail, but not big breasts flopping about? Also he said it was on a Saturday Oct 20th 1967 I checked it was on a Friday so IDK
Bro he’s lying about something. He’s spinning a great story, but he’s not being honest about something, and he really should be honest about everything when telling a story like that. He’s leaving a lot of room for doubt. I don’t understand that.
@@themelt1657 because he didnt want the public attention and cause of the negative effect it had on himself and on his wife. Bob Gimlin said his wife was upset with him and threatened to divorce him cause of the footage. Giblin said it effected him personally and he wanted to stay away from the controversy
That is true. She got some fierce flak at work. He was told he was a kook and made fun of. I don't blame him one bit. I have had 2 incidents and this was more recently. I got some bqd looks in 2011/2013. I can only begin to imagine what it would have been like in the late 60's
It did change. At least twice. Something about he got off the horse after he got across the creek then got off the horse before the creek. Something like that. But it “did” change
I guess you haven't seen the expert analysis. 1. Muscles can be seen 2. Female Breasts 3. Foot Anatomy Difference 3. Longer Arms than Feet compared to humans. 4. Walk Pattern totally different than humans. @user-ze6er6dx9x
BS! It has been PROVEN MK manipulated the film to make it look bad. MK started out good, but he stared loosing his audience, clicks and turned into a manipulator. Sad. He won't MAN up even though he was cqught at the altering of the films. The sad thing is the harm he has caused and is still causing. He is probably sitting back in his chair, chuckling qt the his damage. Come on MK, man up! Admit you didn't think Bob would get threatened over your subterfuge!
He is truthful. Poor man has been mocked all this life. He had nothing to gain. I wish I had the privilege to meet him. Im on the east coast. God Bless you sir.
You would like him immediately! He is a fine honest gentleman. To bad there aren't more like him. This country wouldn't be such q threat to itself so much right now!
And he stated before: "I was totally convinced no one could fool me. And of course I'm an older man now ... and I think there could have been the possibility of a hoax. But it would have to be really well planned by Roger Patterson."
@@tomasgomez9925there's no way Patterson could have fooled Gimlin- Bob had a rifle and could have shot the guy. He knew he was looking at a real creature. Bunch of interviewers were pitching that possibility. He got confused.
The famous film was shown in the theatre when I was a boy. I grew up in the bush and then out in the country. I knew what animals looked like when they moved. As soon as I saw the film my first thought was, “Its real...that’s no guy in a suit”. The muscles moving under the skin couldn’t be faked. Not in those days, anyhow.
I agree Stewart, the best costume around the same time was, planet of the apes by 20th fox. With all there experts and money the apes still didn't look 100%. You still knew it was a man in a suit.
My best friend, a state Fish & Wildlife Biologist, who knows wild animals well, and I, studied blown up single frames of this footage, and studied the film too, slow motion, and normal speed. My friend was 100% certain that the Ape in this footage is real; not a man in an ape suit, and so am I. I was born and raised in Montana, hunted big game all my life, worked one summer in Yellowstone Park, so I think I know wild animals too.
It’s very easy for a simpleton to say “oh that’s just a man and an ape suit”. But for an educated individual who actually reads and watches the research that has been done on the tape should have no question on whether or not the footage was real. Which it was.
Love Mr Gimlin! What an experience he and Patterson had! 35 years of people calling him a “kook” and they’ve probably NEVER left a paved road in their life! City slickers sipping on their 7/11 slurpee and Sasquatch jerky certainly know the wilderness and ALL it entails! 😂
I can see the honesty in this man's eyes Don't feel bad mister I saw a flying saucer coming up from behind my house one night and I know nobody believes it when I tell them and I don't even have any film of it this took place in 2004 about 11:30 p.m.
Damn how gullible are you . This is a 100 percent guy bullshiting you telling a bs story.and I belive in bigfoot but once I heard his story and way he lies and talks I knew it's a fake
Bob's salt of the Earth. You couldn't ask for a better witness. He hasn't changed his story in all the years, since he saw Patty. Listen to him talk; and it's easy to conclude that he saw what he described. It almost ruined his life; and for many years he remained silent on the topic. Since he finally came forward to speak, he hasn't become rich and famous, either. In fact, it's only recently that people close to him have stepped in to protect his interests. Bob speaks with the authority of truth in his words.
hahahahaha...he's got you fooled also huh? He borrowed film equipment, to go into the mountains to make a bigfoot movie, this is FACT. He was broke and needed to make money from it, also fact. Then he just HAPPENS to catch a bigfoot out in the open??...NOT BUYING IT for a second. THEN, the guy who said he was paid to wear a suit for Bob and Roger, passed a lie detector test. Imo, Bob is a fraud and will go to hell for lying.....
@John Cornell Rene Dahinden kept them quiet with threats, Gimlin started to frequent the symposiums after Dahinden's death in 2001. That whole Bluff Creek went down differently than what most are led to believe. ruclips.net/video/VRNTzUHo8uw/видео.html. It wasn't only Patterson and Gimlin that were there. There is other film footage showing what really happened.
@@Jose_Hunters_EWF_Remixes There's also an overwhelming body of (admittedly circumstantial) evidence in support of such a species existing. Most skeptics I've seen who deny the existence of a hominid have proven to be more irrational and given to conspiracy theories than those who are in support of the notion these things exist. If circumstantial evidence can put a felon away for life in court, then it's good enough for me at the moment to be on the side of "this probably is a thing." None of it is proof, however. Proof is what we need. BUT -- and this is where it gets tricky -- if the evidence we've gathered so far and analyzed is anything to go by, getting the proof we absolutely need to shut up the gaslighters once and for all would be the most dangerous zoological attempt at anything since Jane Goodall started hanging out with chimps.
Ditto to this. I will turn 59 in September, and if I live to Mr. Bob's age, look as good, and exhibit as much youthfulness, I will be thanking the Almighty!
I spoke to Bob in Nov 2016 at ocean shores,Wa.Such a very nice gentleman.He told me in detail what led up to the actual video and after he and Patterson left to go process the film.The bad rainy weather that night,roads washing away! Very dramatic experience! Now,people just do not realize how far back up Bluff Creek they were from Orleons.Gosh,I hope Bob allows some one to make a movie about that faithful day back in Oct. 1967! Bob is a prince of a man!
These days, it is hard for some people to believe that when this film footage was taken, that road and area in Northern California had its first road into Bluff creek area put in.
For those who continue to remain critical of Bob’s story, even after studying the evidence, as well as, logically considering all of the variables involved, all I ask of you is to submit a sensible, reasonable answer to only one question: why would these two grown men put forth the amount the time, money, and resources they did in order to design and manufacture a very believable full-body hair suit (probably the first of its kind) and then, PUT BOOBS ON IT??? Yes, the Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot has fully developed breasts, indicating that it is a female. Why in god’s name would anyone attempting to FAKE the most involved Sasquatch sighting of all time put big dangly boobs on it??? Please also keep in mind that at the time that this footage was shot, “Bigfoot” was not the massive cultural phenomenon it is today…it became that way, in large part, BECAUSE OF this footage. For those insisting that it can’t be real simply because “It looks fake”, the question begs to be asked, “How can one criticize the legitimacy of the appearance of a thing no one has ever seen?” Flat Earthers use this brand of logic quite often, insisting that the images of space, Earth, the moon, other planets, etc are all CGI and don’t actually exist, because it all looks so manufactured, like a movie. I don’t think it’s necessary for me to break down the thinking required here in order to recognize the fallacy of such a statement, as it is impossible for a person to either confirm or refute the legitimacy of a thing they have never actually seen, themselves. One area of study that I find the most compelling, with regard to the potential existence of the entity we call ‘Bigfoot’, is that of body mechanics. It doesn’t take much time or analysis to recognize the key differences that exist in the way that the physical bodies of humans and gorillas function and operate. This also applies to creature we know as Sasquatch. If you go over to ThinkerThunker’s channel and watch the latest 3 or 4 videos he’s released, it becomes very apparent that not only are there drastic differences in the way their bodies behave in relation to our own, but those differences are remarkably consistent. Apes, especially gorillas, tend to have much shorter legs and much longer arms than humans, they have virtually no neck, a “pointed” head, extremely wide shoulders, etc…all qualities that we see in the most legitimate documented Bigfoot sightings available on film. They also tend to lean forward when either walking or running, and their leading and trailing legs make an approx 90 degree angle when walking…which, if attempted by a human, resembles something akin to the human imitation of a chicken. Anyway, I highly recommend spending considerable time checking out the videos on TT’s channel, for anyone truly interested in studying this amazing phenomenon.
“Big dangly boobs” 😂 I have too asked why these men would add breasts (big dangly boobs 😂) to the Sasquatch, considering it was the 60’s, and would have been seen as crude, and more unbelievable. Sasquatch were considered monsters back then, no way would these guys add the breasts. I love Patty. She and the mother and baby Bigfoot (filmed on Independence Day a few years back) are my absolute favourite. I laughed out loud to the comment about the boobs….like head back laughing 😆 thank you. I’m such a child 👧
Answer on your question why to put breast on suit, well this is about inteligence lvl, and the reason why would they do it is exactly your way of thinking, because it create illusion that its real, because who would do that right? Do you understand this paradox? “Lets make sasquatch female so people will be even more confused that who on earth would do that””, why not male?”.. dont undersetimate peoples creativity and inteligence, I dont claim its fake, to me its also bizare that even Patterson insisted that its real till he died, who would die as liar for some stupid foptage right? Or maybe he believed on sasquatch, even saw one so he decided to create at least fake footage to break taboo of this topic, and he refused to confest truth because in his mind it was truth. But who knows, there is so much dust created around this footage, begining with guy claiming he is one in that suit, he can be also payed to lie for discrediting this footage for whoevers reason, you can find on both sides so many motivation to lie.. I am staying open but this video is not enaugh to convice me, in that kind of resolution even shity suit would look good..
Pattison had already published a book about Bigfoot and was now setting out to make a film about Bigfoot, so he had a high motive to film it. They set out to an area where "bigfoot" had been spotted by others recently. I don't know if the bigfoot was real on not, but in my opinion it was not. They couldn't get an actor who was eight to ten feet tall (like a grizzly standing on its hind legs) so they had to make the costume a six foot female. Maybe it was some guy who didn't work for Pattison or Gimlin but was wandering around in a bigfoot costume, pranking people. A very sophisticated costume mind you.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big screen adaptation made of this story yet. A true-to-life recreation of Roger & Bob's lives before the film, the day of the encounter, how their lives changed afterward (for better or worse), & of course the pop cultural impact of their experience.
That's an interesting point; it's probably because this film is still so divisive; a film adaptation of the whole story leading up to and including the making of this one-minute film and everything that happened afterward, would ultimately have to come out on either the "real" or "hoax" side, or it wouldn't satisfy any audience. As someone born in the 60s it's interesting to me how much staying power this film has had. I remember hearing about it a couple of times when I was a kid; once I think I saw a snippet of the film in a TV advertisement for some documentary feature. It was confusing to be because it was interspersed with close-up footage of "ape-men" that was obviously fake and made specifically for the documentary, yet I remember the announcer saying something about the film of the creature walking away in the distance being claimed by the filmmaker to be a real "Bigfoot", i.e., some strange creature that was not human. I learned a bit about it in 6th grade social studies class when we did a current affairs unit that covered mysteries and the paranormal, like UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, and Bigfoot. We were encouraged to be sceptical about it, just like other unprovable phenomenon like ghosts and ESP. I never gave much more thought to it until I saw the film again in an episode of the the A & E TV documentary series Ancient Mysteries, in the 1990s. It was shown at the end of a sequence of a number of other videotaped, filmed, or photographed claimed sightings of Bigfoot, all of which had long since been debunked as fakes or just cases of mistaken identity, eg. bears standing on their hind legs, or unusually-shaped tree stumps. It was presented as the only visual evidence that has still not be conclusively proven to be faked. The difference between it and all those other laughably unconvincing pieces of "evidence" was striking. I don't understand how do many people find it so easy to write this film off as just another hoax; they must just refuse to really look at it closely.
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5cithere’s a way they could make a film without it leaning on either side. they did it with the exorcism of emily rose and allowed the audience to decide what really happened.
What a genuine, honest and nice man. Im glad he was part of such an epic experience and it is sad that Patterson didnt live to see how much impact their film had on the world.
He sounds like a liar and of course he has to be because if bigfoot was real We'd have tons of evidence. He keeps mentioning the 'fall colors'. The only problem with that is that is that they're in a conifer forest. There are no fall colors.
@@torreyintahoe there is tons of evidence, footprint casts, audio, tree structures, thousand of sighting reports and the film Roger and Bob made of the creature which no one has replicated even with todays technology. You call him a liar because you don't like what he says and your opinion doesnt count for much
@@torreyintahoe either you don't understand what the word evidence is or you are too lazy to do any research, actually im guessing both. The film Roger and Bob made is evidence, it may not be conclusive but if it was fake, how come no one can make a monkey suit that has the same limb proportions or looks anything like the creature in the film ? Even though people have spent thousands trying. Then there are hundreds of footprint casts showing unique dermal ridges and a so called metatarsal break and dimensions well outside of human norms. Then there are audio recordings that under professional analysis can be shown to not belong to any known creature. Then there are tree structures requiring power well beyond that of humans in places no machinery could get to. All of that is evidence. You arrogantly assume you know everything surrounding this subject, it is evident you know virtually nothing.
@@jupitermoongauge4055 I do understand what evidence is. Everything you just listed is circumstantial. None of it is evidence. If there is evidence to support a theory then the theory becomes a fact and it is certainly not a fact that bigfoot exists. If bigfoot did exist we would have found skeletal remains a long time ago. There is no living mammal whose remains we have not found. Do you know what is a fact? The guy who dressed up in the suit for the film admitted to doing so while be given a polygraph. Now that's evidence.
Man I could listen to this guys stories. It must have been a hell of a roller coaster ride of a life . He was only in his 20 s so he has dealt with all the ups and downs. He reminds me of my stepdad We always had so much fun out riding horses and him telling me stories.
Over 50 years since they made the film public, and no one can debunk it. In fact, with every technological advancement in video stabilization, the added detail has only made the creature in the film more obviously real. We can see muscle groups flexing, the bare soles of Patty's feet, and her fingers curling and extending with each step -- thats movement of fingers and hands which hang on very long arms. These details have been studied by the experts in Cryptozoology as well and film making and special effects. They all state that what the film shows could not have been achieved in 1967, and cannot be duplicated now.
@@orlfane1622 It has been declared genuine by multiple authorities, Industrial Light and Magic, experts from Disney, Jane Goodall, and more. Do some research.
Thank you Bob for all you have done. My father watched a mother and child walk up a mountain for 5 mins above Lake Tahoe in the spring of 1966 and did not what it was until we watched your film on tv. My Father call me into the room and we watched it on tv and he asked what I saw I said that what we saw at star lake
If you look even closer you'll see a horizontal line at the top of its thigh, (where the bottom half of the suit meets the top half) oh and a large groove on the right hand side of suit which indicates an oversized suit. Oh and in case you all forgot, it was filmed in a place called Bluff Creek! Dum dum dum! Y'all been fooled big time suckers!
John Cornell haha look who it is! I find it weird that you keep posting on these videos? Why don’t you do something better with your time ? Ring a bell! Surprised you find any time to reply with that life sized Jeff Meldrum poster behind our door your masterbate too
I was on the fence about Bigfoot, but when this gentleman said after looking at the film " you've got nothing, I saw so much more", you couldn't make that up in a hundred years. This man is legit, and so is patty.
@@wingedhussar1453 i have to disagree with you sir. Maybe he has told his story so many times the past 50 years that what you are hearing may sound rehearsed. But im a bit confused...you say you believe in these creatures, but yet the guy who is in the original film is being interviewed..thats him in the 1967 film, yet you dont believe him?? Either the most historical account by the person who was there is legit, or you dont believe they are real. Please clarify if you will...thank you..
I was on the fence until I saw the updates on the video 📹 where you can see the whole leg, fat and muscle jiggle with each stride and impact with the ground along with the breasts moving up and down for 1967 its impossible. The suites the use now don't even work like that either they use them for mass with padding but don't ripple because the padding does not behave that way only cgi can compete with that 'suit' from 67. If like some claim that was from 67 then where was the guy who who it made and claiming it because its a better 'suit' that anything we have today.
I had the *GREAT PLEASURE* of meeting Roger and Bob at Sacramento City College in Nov. '67 right after they shot this *Historical* film; they were premiering the film at the college. I was able to talk to them after the film showing in a small group. Later in my experience as a seasonal employee of the Forest Service as a Surveyor Tech had many experiences of Bigfoot encounters over the time of living in the forest over a period of a year of living in remote areas!
Over 50 years have passed since the famous Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot film,....it's been studied, analyzed and scrutinized by experts and skeptics alike....and still it passes all the scientific,..anatomical,. and animal characteristics criteria for being genuine.....my belief is that shaky, grainy footage on a sunny day in the fall of 1967, that lasts barely a minute is of a large female Bigfoot.......and that astounding clip as intrigued us all ever since.
If anyone truly wants a chance to encounter a Forrest giant then I suggest Mt Shasta, MT Hood and especially Mt St Helens. Anytime I’ve been in those mountains it’s just a different feeling of not being alone. Very beautiful but mysterious places. Don’t be an idiot and beat on trees, whoop and all that BS or you will never see them. You will only upset them. You don’t need to warn them your there. Just be normal, camp, etc. If they want to let you see them they will.
its amazing everyone asks for proof on film and when they get it people still cannot believe it this creature walked away not petrified but with distain for people disturbing it going about its own business the look back was a kind of saying keep your distance its power was unmistakable
This man is not making his story up, first of all.. he had no reason to and second..he comes across as a man of integrity. I believe he saw what he said they saw.
Great man and great legacy. They managed to film a true legend, that has been reported about for centuries beforehand as a "Wild Man". Everyone who has seen these creatures with their own eyes knows he's 100% genuine.
Yet in the 60 years since no one has been able to capture one of these so-called creatures, being so brazen in their comportment, with far more advanced filming equipment, and greater increases in camping and hiking in all of these parks where the creature is supposedly at home. If you really expect people to believe that then that’s fine I guess but I don’t.
I was born and raised in Montana. In college, In 1963, I had a Professor named Dr. Joseph Feathers (obviously Indian), who had a small collection of newspaper reported sightings of Bigfoot. In talking with me about the subject, in his office, outside of class time, he told me something that I will never forget: "White man does not know everything yet." INDEED.
Peter von Feldt, Bob is neither an actor nor a filmmaker. He just went along with Patterson to help with the horses. That was his job. He broke horses for a living.
Peter von Feldt that shows too much ignorance🤣. Guy thought that bob gimlin was an actor and a filmmaker😂. All bob done was help roger out with the expedition and sight the Bigfoot with him, not record the actual footage. Also filmmakers aren’t really good liars🤣
He was as crooked as they come...I know and he knows that Roger Patterson was " Bigfoot" I remember he left behind extra footage of him wearing the costume and how him and his partner Hoaxed the story. Paterson had stood 6'7" at the time of the filming.
@@ryanmiller327 Ryan…the Patterson film is evidence. It’s the only artifact that can’t be proven, nor has it be disproved. All the other crap…I agree with you. Especially with cell phones and drones now. But the PG film is an interesting while provocative just by itself.
He could have made himself rich by telling the “truth” about what happened. He’s never done that. He’s had over 50 years to cash in. He’s telling the same story he told in 1967. Do the homework and you’ll see he’s never deviated. Whatever happened out there, he believes what he experienced.
Well at first he described it as being over 6 ft and 300lbs which describes the man that admitted to wearing the suit. Now he says it was over 7ft and 800lbs.
He's been a hustler his whole life. He even approached Roger's widow Patricia at his funeral demanding money from the film. When she refused, he sued her in court. Vilma Radford's contract was brought before the judge, and he didn't buy Patricia's claim that it was forged, which means Bob gets paid.
Patterson's wife left him because of his bad reputation from so many people calling him a lier he said on his death bed his film was genuine and this man's story has never changed you can tell he's honest with all the technological Analysis of the film shows it's genuine
@@rjl1309 no he’s right. Where’s your proof he’s wrong, Also the proportions are too different from a humans for it to be anyone in a cheap 60s monkey suit, also the “suit “looks way better than anything else for the time, so it can’t be a suit.
@@WHOOOSHXDOfficial Well... As a Telecine Colorist, I did the "Mastering" of this film. Patterson's Grandson and Mr. Gimlin both sat in during the session. They both talked freely about the footage, about the fame & money it brought. It was never their original plan to have things blow up as they did. But rode the wave anyway. I'm not saying their is no creature like Bigfoot, but this isn't it.
@@rjl1309 I disagree but very interesting info. I feel like they did catch something real but they dragged it out by talking to people after Patterson’s death. Patterson never admitted any said hoax and said on his death bed the creature was real, Bob even refused to talk for a while. Bob Gimlin very well did appreciate the amount of money he gained but even then he declined $1,000,000 to say it was a hoax because according to him “the creature was real and saying it was a hoax would be dishonest, which he wasn’t.” I’m not saying you’re experience with Gimlin isn’t true, but seeing the proportions and the fact the said suit is way better then anything at the time screams that it’s a real animal, yet the reputation of Patterson kind of ruins the film for some people.
Oh Bob is still looking good for his age. Can you just imagine what it would be like to be him and see what he saw! So cool. We Love you and so sorry that you had to deal with the nonbelievers.
I am incredibly surprised to find this.. didn’t know this excited. Though the cameramen would be king gone by now. Wow.. maybe Bigfoot really is out there..
People do seem to think it’s simple to lie, there is no way this guy is lying , so many sightings and encounters from very reliable characters, but for some reason the people in the government don’t want people to know anything about these unique creatures...
this man got pranked hard longest prank ever 🤣 Roger was a conman, and used this man for his hoax, and never told him to make the story more believable
@@scottcroteau7375 There is an interview of a guy who says he is the one in the monkey suit. He passed two lie detector tests. Bob hasn't passed any lie detector tests.
@@saulespino2510 that same guy had no idea where the video was shot. He said it was shot in a park, but it wasn’t. He’s been discredited numerous times.
I’m currently reading the book “Sasquatch,Legend Meets Science” by Jeff Meldrum.It is a comprehensive study of large ape species and how they could possibly relate to the existence of Bigfoot in North America.Whether you believe or not,it is a good read. I am certainly interested in the possible existence of Sasquatch,but I am still on the fence as to whether they truly do exist.But when people who have nothing to gain but ridicule come forward with their experiences,I can’t help but think they are being truthful.
I know, how in the world can we still, in 2024, have a giant ape species living in remote wilderness areas in the world, NOT YET scientifically identified/classified, but that is exactly what we have, believe it or not.
![DDG & G Herbo - Nosey [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I9Ra0Zc2NlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
This man is 88 years old.... looks damn good.
Speaks like he's still 40 or 50, too. White don't crack.
@@nagihangot6133 probably doesn't smoke cigarettes lol
Probably doesn't smoke cigarettes lol
Maybe he eats bigfoot meat like Peter Caine. 😁
hes a cowboy. He smokes 2 packs of Marlboro red a day and a pouch of Big Chief, chewing tobacco
Thank you Mr. Bob Gimlin,, You and Roger Patterson have set the BenchMark for all of the researchers in this country!! What a day you had in October of 1967,,,"Priceless" from Ohio👌🍻
October 22nd, and he showed the film the next day?
Bob Gimlin. The man is a legend.
It's a shame what he had to go through.
I don't get it, if someone thinks that his movie is a hoax good for you, that's not against the law to make such a movie !!!!!!!
I ,personally, do believe it's real, but everybody got the right to think what he likes.
Its all bs.!
@@andrewp1998 I guess that settles it then, thanks.
he is the man for sure. i was flying to a kiss concert. bob and guy was flying to the ohio bigfoot conference. and i couldnt believe it. bob recognize me from youtube. on the plane. i was going to illinois for the concert. they were connecting flight in chicago to ohio. so they saw me and said lets get photos together when we get off the plane. i could not believe bob knew who i was. as i have worked with cliff and bobo and jeff meldrum has come to see me with cliff when i lived on mt hood for 15 years.
Legendary conman!
Great interview of a very well-articulated, nice guy. It's so interesting to hear his engaging retelling of what happened and his experiences. I have always felt it unfortunate that we never get to hear Patterson's side of the story--he died from cancer roughly 5 years after the encounter.
I would want to meet this man. In 74, when I first saw the footage, I was freaked.
The most credible witness I've ever seen.
Bobs a truthful soul. The man is a Humble and a honest to goodness true mountain man/Cowboy with little Indian to boot! He’s not a liar. Men like Bob are rare in this day and age. The film is Without doubt after examination -all these years by Munn and others to be Sasquatch. MK Davis’s Early work was very good, but MK fell by the wayside ‘attempting to stay in the limelight’ -As time progressed and others began good analysis and research.
Sage runner: Youve got it right.
The film is as genuine as this this man. Will we ever get the opportunity to see another one.
If you look deeply into peter caine and look past the comedy and his own mocking of the topic and look past his silly rediculous videos you will learn that peter caine really does have 3 specimens in a walk in freezer....as nuts as that sounds, he dad killed 3 with a 12 gauge birdshot automatic browning in 1953. And had to cut them up to get out of the swamp and fly them on a float plane. You have to look deep to see its not just bullshit, peter does a great job of making 99% of the people laugh and dismiss his own videos and now he finally realizes he went too far in the mockery. Like trumps lies on the election and his anti covid consequences. Peter mocked too hard. On the double right arm video he says half way through, no one in science takes it serious that he has the specimens.
@@thornyturtleranch4uPeter Cain is as believable as Todd Standing and Paul Freeman
the fact he calls a creek a "crick" is how i know he's telling the truth lol
There ya go! Thats the determining factor! Works for me toooo. Lol
Great video! When are we going to realize we can't place everything in little boxes and pretend we know everything about every subject on this planet..What a gift to have seen a Saquatch in it's home..I hope we never capture one..I love the mystery of just knowing they exist..Very down to earth gentleman..
Bigfoot is more aware of us than we are of it. That thought gives me the creeps.
I've listened to this man's story since I was a kid, he hasn't changed it in any way in the time I've listened to him. I really believe he and Roger saw something that day.
If you keep repeating the same lie it becomes remarkable.
@@1DRIPSTER exactly
@@1DRIPSTER he didnt lie
@@1DRIPSTER man stfu you unbelievable puto! One of those guys that would say he’s “lying” fuck out of here dude.
I agree, I've read about the case as a child, and see no reason to doubt its a real creature. Suits still haven't been made as good as the filmed subject, so I doubt 2 cowboys made a better one than Hollywood.
Bob is such a honest, good person! I would love to shake his hand!
So honest he refuses to do a polygraph.
@@J-Ball He did several polygraph examinations. It all on video.
@@robbywright7591 links or you're speaking from your bum.
@@J-Ball He's speaking from his bum
It was so awesome to meet Bob eight years ago and sit and talk with him. I saw there video clip at the movies in 1968. Three years later i had an encounter!! I've believed in sasquatch my whole life and am so grateful alot of other people have too!!😊
I have always believed in this case since seeing it growing up as a kid these guys were the real thing !!
So you’ve been gullible for quite some time. Good to know.
I've some land to sell you.
THE real footage was always there in the Patty film! Bob is so genuine! Kind man!
They are not showing the whole film, ask him about that!
And for good reason too...
thank you for putting up this wonderful interview
I lived deep in the Pacific Northwest and I’ve seen them 3 times and a girlfriend when I was 16 needed to pee bad and she insisted on going far enough that I couldn’t see her go and within 2 minutes of going out behind trees she came back screaming and saying there was a monkey and she was crying. Anyway it made a believer out of her. Me and my best friend would ride in the trees on our BMX bikes down hills and they would watch us and follow us.
When I was about 9 years old , one of them killed a horse and later the horses head was in a near by creek and I knew after that , that they kill animals and eat meat but I would never have guessed they would eat a horse ? Now it makes sense but at the time it really scared me, for some reason I thought they eat berries and leaves but after that they scared me. I don’t talk face to face with people about it because they think I’m seeking attention or I’m making it up. Everyone says “it’s a guy in a gorilla suit” It’s pointless to talk to people about it, I pray those people run into one.
I believe u.b careful at night if u still live there
When time travel 🧭 is possible soon I’ll be there around the corner watching beautiful patty take her stride I can’t wait! October 20 th 1967.
I had to unsubb from MK Davis because of his accusations towards Mr. Gimlin.
Thank you so much for uploading this.
19:00 October 1967 was a Friday. He said it was filmed on a Saturday. So that means it was actually filmed October 21 1967.
This guy is a legend. Clearly not the first person to see a Sasquatch but without his participation, this film likely would have never happened.
Than you Bob.
Thanks you've spotted his lie but what, you dismiss it and still believe him? 😂 sad
@M60gunner1971 . . .
.no lie ya twat. Just zeroed in on the exact date. He never lied about any of it.
Believable and so awesome. Thank you for sharing🙏🏻🇺🇸
The real deal at the right place at the right time
I believe Bob, and I believe the video actually shows a real bigfoot. Best, most clear video of bigfoot I`ve ever seen. Roger Patterson still swore on his death bed that the video was authentic. To me, the sasquatch that was recorded looks like it was actually embarrassed to be caught out in the open. It wasn`t scared. No reason something that big would be. There could very well have been more of them around. Also, the reaction of the horse tells me that it smelled the sasquatch, and was scared. The horse knew what it was looking at.
Exactly, it's the horse's reaction that does it for me. He's telling the truth.
I've seen the footage till the end,there are more of them,males,Patty got caught out walking for some reason,also there is a strange light in one the frames!
So bigfoot chased Patterson all the way to his death bed. Don't ever tell anyone.
Great interview
A truly believable man.... I’ve never doubted their story
This is TRUTH!!!! Honest man!
*I should believe what this guy says. I can just tell by the way he's talking. He must have been very attractive when he was younger too.*
he is still very attractive, getting old dont make you ugly, as you get older you will, realize this
@@misguidedangel6550
*What are you talking about? I'm already 55.*
If this guy is correct and what he witnessed was an estimated 800 lbs,, that means they have to chow down a lot.
Two major 'events' happened to me that same year. First, this came out and then, later, a classic 'flying saucer' flew low and slow directly over my house at about 10 PM. At the time, I had an unshielded porch light, so the craft was lit up from my light. Looked to be about 100' in diameter and at an estimated 100' above me. Fifty years later, I can still clearly envision it.
Please, just stop ✋🏻
What a wonderful accent Robert has! Such a lovable and sweet personality,
such a kind human being! I believe him, and wish him many blessings from
the Lord, the Creator of all things!
What a gem of an interview.🙏🏻
Bob is such a gentleman, he can't say breasts..,..called them mammary glands.......he is legendary
Their footage still to this day is the one I truly believe.
@@jeffalbillar7625 yes! Dr. Jeff Meldrum thinks it's a biological animal. I admire him for saying so!! Taking a risk professionally.
@@robbywright7591 there are still people who say that it's fake. For real. Just today some dude painted a picture of Roger Patterson living it up. The man died broke in bed from cancer. He said that he was able to give his family a nest egg before he died. I guess that means it's all the greatest hoax in history. Everybody is fooled but him.
Unfortunately few others do, because it's so obviously fake.
@@Openreality like your picture?
Same here first footage of that creature
I’m just here to hear him say crick
That's what us Montanans call it too & it's a barrow pit not a ditch.
that's how they say it out west
My Mom born and raised in Colorado and she always said crik.
here to hear
I'm a Swede from Minnesota and a crick is a small creek
Sir I have nothing but the utmost respect for you. I am a 62-year-old man currently in Fort Worth Texas. You sir, have been the most in my opinion important factor, in causing people to wake up to the truth of Bigfoot.
With all due respect my hat is off to you!
Surely this is sarcasm?
DONT BE SO GULLIBLE!
HES LIEING HIS BUTT OFF OVER AND OVER.
THEY'RE PROBABLY ONLY KEEPING THE COMMENTS THAT FIT THEIR NARRATIVE.
DONT TRUST WHAT THIS GUY IS SAYING.
BOB HEIRONIMUS TOOK MANY POLYGRAPHS AND PASSED SAYING HE WAS IN THE COSTUME.
THIS 1967 SHORT FILM WAS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A HOAX.
lol
@@TheBlueDogMan haha
The only thing that can block anyone from new truths is condemnation before investigation.
Doesn't strike me as a man who would want his life to be a big lie. If he'd been on his own without a camera he probably would have kept it to himself. I believe everything he says here is true.
Iazzaboyce Great point!
Iazzaboyce he is telling a fabricated lie to cover the fact that he participated in the tracking and murder of Patty and her family, along with Patterson and Renee Dehindon nd John Smith.
@@staceyhurn9733. And where did you come by this subjective information from?
Brian Hunter there is more film than they released. MK Davis has a copy. Go watch it and it will prove it
@@staceyhurn9733. I'll try to find it, do you have a link you could share?
Hell of a nice guy. I have spoke to him twice now and I fee l ashamed for the folks in the past(and a few more recently) that gave him and his wife grief. Bob is a genuine, honest, forthright and decent gentleman! 👣👣
Yes he is!! Great man!
I do believe I have seen
@@chris681975 they claim, they didn't have suits that good back then. its has breasts and all
sue yup and a pu$$y aswell 😂
Oakeshott quit wit the name calling pal 😂
I have seen a sasquatch, in rural pa in the early 1990's. What he said about everything happening so fast is what people dont understand. I saw it while mt biking and knew what I was seeing instantly. I watched it for 5 to 10 seconds and from 50 to 100 feet away. I generally only tell my story on line to avoid the people who want to explain that i was mistaken. This guy is telling the truth bc his story has never changed. Lies are hard to remember.
@@snko92 You hit your axe on a rock.
Pennsylvania has lots of bears so I’d say you saw a bear possibly standing on its hind legs which they do.
Lies are hard to remember. That's one to remember.
@@jumboslice1514 see bears almost weekly where i live. They stand up but rarely walk, let alone run, on their hind legs. I know what I saw. I cant explain it but I know what I saw.
@@LawnMower_gaming1 thanks and you are correct. I see bears often and at all times of the day. I have never mistaken one for something else. This is why I seldom tell my story except online. I have spent a great deal of my life in the woods of PA, MD, VA, and WV and this was my only bigfoot encounter. Seen some other strange things but bigfoot only once.
Where's the rest of the interview? He wasn't done talking and I wasn't done listening.
I believe him...story hasn't changed in 52 years
yes it has
And it never will change bro,because as most of us believe it's true
FAKE... Dude that was paid by Patterson to dress up as the Sasquatch openly admitted it....again... FAKE
@@Lue_Jonin so u believe the guy who says he was paid(without any proof) not a chance he was lying.
exactly, hes has nothing to gain, he just wanted to share what they found in the woods.
Bob is a certified badass...they dont make em like that anymore...rare breed
hahahahaha...he's got you fooled also huh? He borrowed film equipment, to go into the mountains to make a bigfoot movie, this is FACT. He was broke and needed to make money from it, also fact. Then he just HAPPENS to catch a bigfoot out in the open??...NOT BUYING IT for a second. THEN, the guy who said he was paid to wear a suit for Bob and Roger, passed a lie detector test. Imo, Bob is a fraud and will go to hell for lying.....
@@drew-shourd you need to get your facts, straight dude. Petterson passed the same polygraph test, he made no money and even talked about going hunting for it again with a tranq dart...on his death bed. The suit doesn't exist, the supposed makers have retracted the claim they made the suit in the film. The guy who tried to claim he was in the suit was owed money by Patterson so vowed to discredit him. The superimposed images of the dude in the suit no way match the footage - it goes on and on..,
@@drew-shourd
Better do you homework Drew, you shit the bed. There are experts with more degrees than a Thermostat that have PROOF that the creature in the Paterson-Gimlin film is a wild animal, not some idiot in a costume.
ruclips.net/video/KILP1CFpUVg/видео.html
As Bob said in the beginning of the film, Back in the old days, he and his wife were thought to be kooks because Bob was with Roger when they finally got some film of Bigfoot. For years Bob kept his mouth shut because his wife got so much grief at her job about BF, she was on the verge of divorcing him. I watching the film years ago and thought it was a hoax too. I have spent all of my spare time over the last 40 years camping, hiking, backpacking in state forests and game lands. I have NEVER seen, smelled, or saw tracks of anything that could have been bigfoot. But I spent most of my life living in the NE US. I never spent any time in the Pacific Northwest. Its a different ball game. I have been to the Rockie Mts. but not for extended periods of time, so I don't have a dog in the fight. Humans have different bone structure than BIG FOOT. Its an animal.
ruclips.net/video/MKUwdHex1Zs/видео.html
@@johnadams5489 Experts? Laughable. There is a reason no credible scientist or academician believes in the bigfoot myth.....no freaking credible evidence. And those that do, have a financial stake in keeping you rubes dumb and believing.
Drew Shourd LOL you think they had monkey suits that looked that good back then? They hardly have em in 2019!.. watch the breakdown analysis on this video you can clearly see the muscle movement under the skin and the fact it has breasts.. or just do a google search for “man in ape suit” and you’ll see even the best one looks completely fake.. now consider this was 1967 and how it so effortlessly walks thru a dry river bed. Whatever that was it wasn’t a man in a suit, that’s just the easiest answer for people who don’t want to think that there’s an undiscovered animal that the mighty white man hasn’t discovered.. people like you said the same thing about the giant squid and mountain gorilla only to be proven WRONG!.. sorry but if yer intelligent enough, you can clearly see it cant be a suit.. and if it was, it was the best suit in the world and woulda been millions.. nobody has ever produced the actual suit either.. there have been a few tards who claimed to have been the man “in the suit” too 😂. Open yer eyes man. It’s really not that hard to conceive of. I know for a FACT these things exist and couldn’t care less what the ignorant say because their opinions are illformed
Glad I saw this. The man is 100% believable. If you have ever seen something so rare and unexpected, it is a mix of emotions that you have to process and then try to convey to others. I know this first hand. I saw something in Gettysburg military park on a rainy evening well after sundown. My wife and I were parked at the base of Little Round Top. And we both saw a ball of light come up out of the ground about 2 feet off the ground. It moved to the left, then back to the right, went back to center, and closed down as it went back into the ground. She was really shook up and started to cry, and I was just in shock and almost disbelief as to what had just happened. I have always been careful who I told this too, because you know peoples first reaction is to not believe you. Just like this man says..."I know what I saw". I believe him.
@@jorgejiminez-rk1uuBro I truly believe You. You tell it so well "and thats just in text form"
When these things happen, they happen so fast and so unexpected You barely have time to stop and record or the thought to record because your shook. At least in its been that way for me when Ive seen things.
ball lightning!
Interesting to have found this comment. I am a natural skeptic of most things “supernatural” I didn’t believe in ghosts until I had an experience in Gettysburg PA that to this day I cannot explain in any rational manner.
I saw a ball move through the house about 5.5 feet above the floor. It barely cast light onto surfaces. It couldn't cast shadow since it couldnt cast light, but it did glow with a tight feathered edge and it was visible light to my and my ex's eyes. Amazing, pure white visible light like a street light but didn't light the wall hardly at all. About 10-13 inches in diameter.
@@SensibleChuckle People say things like this are lightning....I don't think its that at all. This is some form of coalesced energy. Just speaking for what I saw, I 100% believe that was the spiritual energy of a person/spirit who is attached to that spot. No doubt, the spot their life ended.
After all these years this is still the BEST movie footage of a bigfoot. well done sir.
It’s why I lead to Bigfoot being not real, you’re telling me in 50 years we haven’t gotten anything even close to this footage? Something doesn’t add up.
that's because it's a fraud. With the fact that literally EVERYONE has a camera in their pocket now, this is still the best footage? And you don't find that to be suspicious? Granted, that doesn't prove this isn't real... but it certainly makes his existence suspect.
My respect to this western gentleman cowboy. Like many that I met they don't lie it's not part of their being . Always helpful and solid minded.
That's exactly what ive been trying to tell people.People like Bob have nothing but disdain for Bull Shiters.
Look he is a human like the rest of us. Humans lie, steal and kill without any remorse. There is nothing like this sort of people don't do this or that. You will find in each communities good and bad people and everything in between. And all of us lie each day many times. It starts with wishing your boss a good morning while you would love to kick him into the face. Get my point. Plus it's possible he did not know anything while his dead partner organized everything and found a actor to waer the suite.
@@Lion_Hamza You're shining a much brighter light on yourself than anything in this video or other comments.
He's actually from Missouri, so midwestern gentleman cowboy.
Erich Williams It's real, a real small clip of the truth.
ruclips.net/video/sHIfsYGLRnQ/видео.html
We have lost men of his character and caliber in this country. Thank you for reminding me and the future youth of when we were a great country. P&G film along with your confirmation is all I need to believe. truth is in your eyes and voice. God Bless and respect.
Guy’s an icon,that female Sasquatch was incredible
Michael Ross, no he didn’t. That’s an absolute lie, you frickin waste of space. Try being honest
@@jonahmosher3024 chill out lmao
She was absolutely amazing, wasn't she? I wonder if she's still alive? If not, I hope her children and grandchildren are still up there in Bluff Creek, living peacefully. (Yet never aware of how their matriarch changed history.)
@@stephaniebaker6001 Well put
@Jerry Thomas And apparently she and her family now make commercials for matresses and ATVs! LMAO!
Bob is a grand old man with the alert mind of a 40 or 50- year- old individual, how could anyone doubt his story, he tells it with obvious honesty, He saw what he says he saw, no doubt about it, a living legend.
@Garrett Kjellberg Roger patterson had taken lie detector test even he passed the test...Bob H is a lier ...the reason they coud not recreate the suit is because they lied....
@Garrett Kjellberg I don't believe anything you said, proof please.
@@jowhit226 You poor thing going through life hating everything you hear boo hoo lol.
@@jowhit226
@jowhit
There is literally thousands of accounts throughout history. Do a little research. A couple resources. MK Davis. Greenwave2010 did a breakdown on frame 350 of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Thinkerthunker did another analysis. If you want to understand the topic put a little effort in. I really don’t think the majority of people really care what you think. You believe what you want but if you are interested in knowing there is more information out there than you could dissect in your lifetime on this subject.
At 21:16, the way hes looking to the side as he describes what he saw with his own eyes, and the way he says he saw so much more of everything and of the muscle movement than what his friend captured on film sounded very convincing he's telling the truth that he actually saw it in person, and it was a real big foot or primitive woman or very hairy man that he saw walking about by chance.
Well if he was trying to calm his horse said it was jumping around how could he see any details he said at the time he didn't know it was a female he found out later. How could he see muscle detail, but not big breasts flopping about? Also he said it was on a Saturday Oct 20th 1967 I checked it was on a Friday so IDK
Bro he’s lying about something. He’s spinning a great story, but he’s not being honest about something, and he really should be honest about everything when telling a story like that. He’s leaving a lot of room for doubt. I don’t understand that.
52 years later and the story hasn't changed.I believed it then and I believe it now. Mr Gimmlin is the man.
Anthony Marrone what about the 30 years he wasn’t telling the story. Ask yourself why. Do some investigating.
@@themelt1657 because he didnt want the public attention and cause of the negative effect it had on himself and on his wife.
Bob Gimlin said his wife was upset with him and threatened to divorce him cause of the footage. Giblin said it effected him personally and he wanted to stay away from the controversy
That is true. She got some fierce flak at work. He was told he was a kook and made fun of. I don't blame him one bit. I have had 2 incidents and this was more recently. I got some bqd looks in 2011/2013. I can only begin to imagine what it would have been like in the late 60's
Cheryl I would love to hear about your encounters
It did change. At least twice. Something about he got off the horse after he got across the creek then got off the horse before the creek. Something like that. But it “did” change
I thought it was fake until I saw the stabilized video -- if it was a rubber mask and fur suit then whoever made was incredibly gifted.
Yeah that and they've done better than Hollywood has over the past 70 years😂😂😂
Have another look at the thigh when it is slowed down! You can see the " suit" wrinkle.
Its not a wrinkle, its fur being rubbed together from the swinging hand@@LenSwartz-x1v
I guess you haven't seen the expert analysis. 1. Muscles can be seen 2. Female Breasts 3. Foot Anatomy Difference 3. Longer Arms than Feet compared to humans. 4. Walk Pattern totally different than humans.
@user-ze6er6dx9x
@@LenSwartz-x1v Truth....but they will ignore it lol
This is the true "Blair Which" stuff. Hoax that is still on-going and believed in by so many. Amazing! 😂
Bob you were blessed to have seen patty BF.What a privilege.😊
Yeah after her family and child were murdered, before she was... he was singing kum by yah for sure
BS! It has been PROVEN MK manipulated the film to make it look bad. MK started out good, but he stared loosing his audience, clicks and turned into a manipulator. Sad. He won't MAN up even though he was cqught at the altering of the films. The sad thing is the harm he has caused and is still causing. He is probably sitting back in his chair, chuckling qt the his damage. Come on MK, man up! Admit you didn't think Bob would get threatened over your subterfuge!
What a great interview. So glad he has come back on the scene. Such a shame he and his family had to put up with so much ridicule. Thanks Bob
... And, thank You, Rose !
“I was only 36 years old”
I’m 30, this man made me feel so young lol
I'm 55 and Bob is in better shape then me.
He is truthful. Poor man has been mocked all this life. He had nothing to gain. I wish I had the privilege to meet him. Im on the east coast. God Bless you sir.
Hes not dead! Go meet him.
You would like him immediately! He is a fine honest gentleman. To bad there aren't more like him. This country wouldn't be such q threat to itself so much right now!
And he stated before: "I was totally convinced no one could fool me. And of course I'm an older man now ... and I think there could have been the possibility of a hoax. But it would have to be really well planned by Roger Patterson."
@@tomasgomez9925there's no way Patterson could have fooled Gimlin- Bob had a rifle and could have shot the guy. He knew he was looking at a real creature. Bunch of interviewers were pitching that possibility. He got confused.
Lmao he gained lots!!!
The famous film was shown in the theatre when I was a boy. I grew up in the bush and then out in the country. I knew what animals looked like when they moved. As soon as I saw the film my first thought was, “Its real...that’s no guy in a suit”. The muscles moving under the skin couldn’t be faked. Not in those days, anyhow.
I agree Stewart, the best costume around the same time was, planet of the apes by 20th fox. With all there experts and money the apes still didn't look 100%. You still knew it was a man in a suit.
Yep John Wayne gacy lied until the very end. Consistent lying isn't telling the truth.
My best friend, a state Fish & Wildlife Biologist, who knows wild animals well, and I, studied blown up single frames of this footage, and studied the film too, slow motion, and normal speed. My friend was 100% certain that the Ape in this footage is real; not a man in an ape suit, and so am I. I was born and raised in Montana, hunted big game all my life, worked one summer in Yellowstone Park, so I think I know wild animals too.
It’s very easy for a simpleton to say “oh that’s just a man and an ape suit”. But for an educated individual who actually reads and watches the research that has been done on the tape should have no question on whether or not the footage was real. Which it was.
It's fake. The headpiece that was used to create "Patty" in 1967 can be found at the 4 minute mark here : ruclips.net/video/mB1MM77Nxno/видео.html
Love Mr Gimlin! What an experience he and Patterson had! 35 years of people calling him a “kook” and they’ve probably NEVER left a paved road in their life! City slickers sipping on their 7/11 slurpee and Sasquatch jerky certainly know the wilderness and ALL it entails! 😂
I can see the honesty in this man's eyes Don't feel bad mister I saw a flying saucer coming up from behind my house one night and I know nobody believes it when I tell them and I don't even have any film of it this took place in 2004 about 11:30 p.m.
Damn how gullible are you . This is a 100 percent guy bullshiting you telling a bs story.and I belive in bigfoot but once I heard his story and way he lies and talks I knew it's a fake
😂 trying to prove one man's lie is truth by throwing in your own lie? Classic.
Bob's salt of the Earth. You couldn't ask for a better witness. He hasn't changed his story in all the years, since he saw Patty.
Listen to him talk; and it's easy to conclude that he saw what he described. It almost ruined his life; and for many years he remained silent on the topic. Since he finally came forward to speak, he hasn't become rich and famous, either. In fact, it's only recently that people close to him have stepped in to protect his interests.
Bob speaks with the authority of truth in his words.
Mountain man, You need to check yourself. It’s not gonna be worth it.
hahahahaha...he's got you fooled also huh? He borrowed film equipment, to go into the mountains to make a bigfoot movie, this is FACT. He was broke and needed to make money from it, also fact. Then he just HAPPENS to catch a bigfoot out in the open??...NOT BUYING IT for a second. THEN, the guy who said he was paid to wear a suit for Bob and Roger, passed a lie detector test. Imo, Bob is a fraud and will go to hell for lying.....
@John Cornell Rene Dahinden kept them quiet with threats, Gimlin started to frequent the symposiums after Dahinden's death in 2001. That whole Bluff Creek went down differently than what most are led to believe. ruclips.net/video/VRNTzUHo8uw/видео.html. It wasn't only Patterson and Gimlin that were there. There is other film footage showing what really happened.
@@Jose_Hunters_EWF_Remixes There's also an overwhelming body of (admittedly circumstantial) evidence in support of such a species existing. Most skeptics I've seen who deny the existence of a hominid have proven to be more irrational and given to conspiracy theories than those who are in support of the notion these things exist. If circumstantial evidence can put a felon away for life in court, then it's good enough for me at the moment to be on the side of "this probably is a thing."
None of it is proof, however. Proof is what we need. BUT -- and this is where it gets tricky -- if the evidence we've gathered so far and analyzed is anything to go by, getting the proof we absolutely need to shut up the gaslighters once and for all would be the most dangerous zoological attempt at anything since Jane Goodall started hanging out with chimps.
@Rocky Mountain Adventures & Mining ... and you're a moron. The titties are fake too I suppose. Dickhead
What a nice looking man for his age. His mind is young too.
@@jeffalbillar7625 Lol!!😉
The bigger question is whether you would give it to him even at his age? We would love to know.
@@robbywright7591 I always give them a warning shot.
Ditto to this. I will turn 59 in September, and if I live to Mr. Bob's age, look as good, and exhibit as much youthfulness, I will be thanking the Almighty!
Susan Matako It's real, a real small clip of the truth.
ruclips.net/video/sHIfsYGLRnQ/видео.html
Never been a superstitious person, but that footage looks like a real living thing
Ummm no
No
Yes, and not human
If it was a suit, it would stick out like a sore thumb I that background. Looks perfectly natural, not artificial.
I believe him, no one can lie so smoothly and in so much detail. Whatever happened in 1967,Gimlin wasn't in on it.
I spoke to Bob in Nov 2016 at ocean shores,Wa.Such a very nice gentleman.He told me in detail what led up to the actual video and after he and Patterson left to go process the film.The bad rainy weather that night,roads washing away! Very dramatic experience! Now,people just do not realize how far back up Bluff Creek they were from Orleons.Gosh,I hope Bob allows some one to make a movie about that faithful day back in Oct. 1967! Bob is a prince of a man!
Yeah,make a 🍿 Movie!!!! Like Butch and Sundance.,good idea
Did he laugh?
These days, it is hard for some people to believe that when this film footage was taken, that road and area in Northern California had its first road into Bluff creek area put in.
So, what "...led up to the actual video..."?
I’m surprised a movie about this incident hasn’t been made already.
For those who continue to remain critical of Bob’s story, even after studying the evidence, as well as, logically considering all of the variables involved, all I ask of you is to submit a sensible, reasonable answer to only one question: why would these two grown men put forth the amount the time, money, and resources they did in order to design and manufacture a very believable full-body hair suit (probably the first of its kind) and then, PUT BOOBS ON IT???
Yes, the Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot has fully developed breasts, indicating that it is a female. Why in god’s name would anyone attempting to FAKE the most involved Sasquatch sighting of all time put big dangly boobs on it???
Please also keep in mind that at the time that this footage was shot, “Bigfoot” was not the massive cultural phenomenon it is today…it became that way, in large part, BECAUSE OF this footage. For those insisting that it can’t be real simply because “It looks fake”, the question begs to be asked, “How can one criticize the legitimacy of the appearance of a thing no one has ever seen?”
Flat Earthers use this brand of logic quite often, insisting that the images of space, Earth, the moon, other planets, etc are all CGI and don’t actually exist, because it all looks so manufactured, like a movie. I don’t think it’s necessary for me to break down the thinking required here in order to recognize the fallacy of such a statement, as it is impossible for a person to either confirm or refute the legitimacy of a thing they have never actually seen, themselves.
One area of study that I find the most compelling, with regard to the potential existence of the entity we call ‘Bigfoot’, is that of body mechanics. It doesn’t take much time or analysis to recognize the key differences that exist in the way that the physical bodies of humans and gorillas function and operate. This also applies to creature we know as Sasquatch.
If you go over to ThinkerThunker’s channel and watch the latest 3 or 4 videos he’s released, it becomes very apparent that not only are there drastic differences in the way their bodies behave in relation to our own, but those differences are remarkably consistent. Apes, especially gorillas, tend to have much shorter legs and much longer arms than humans, they have virtually no neck, a “pointed” head, extremely wide shoulders, etc…all qualities that we see in the most legitimate documented Bigfoot sightings available on film. They also tend to lean forward when either walking or running, and their leading and trailing legs make an approx 90 degree angle when walking…which, if attempted by a human, resembles something akin to the human imitation of a chicken.
Anyway, I highly recommend spending considerable time checking out the videos on TT’s channel, for anyone truly interested in studying this amazing phenomenon.
“Big dangly boobs” 😂 I have too asked why these men would add breasts (big dangly boobs 😂) to the Sasquatch, considering it was the 60’s, and would have been seen as crude, and more unbelievable. Sasquatch were considered monsters back then, no way would these guys add the breasts. I love Patty. She and the mother and baby Bigfoot (filmed on Independence Day a few years back) are my absolute favourite. I laughed out loud to the comment about the boobs….like head back laughing 😆 thank you. I’m such a child 👧
Could be Patterson and/or Gymlan were part of a hoax knowingly or unknowingly?
Answer on your question why to put breast on suit, well this is about inteligence lvl, and the reason why would they do it is exactly your way of thinking, because it create illusion that its real, because who would do that right? Do you understand this paradox? “Lets make sasquatch female so people will be even more confused that who on earth would do that””, why not male?”.. dont undersetimate peoples creativity and inteligence, I dont claim its fake, to me its also bizare that even Patterson insisted that its real till he died, who would die as liar for some stupid foptage right? Or maybe he believed on sasquatch, even saw one so he decided to create at least fake footage to break taboo of this topic, and he refused to confest truth because in his mind it was truth. But who knows, there is so much dust created around this footage, begining with guy claiming he is one in that suit, he can be also payed to lie for discrediting this footage for whoevers reason, you can find on both sides so many motivation to lie.. I am staying open but this video is not enaugh to convice me, in that kind of resolution even shity suit would look good..
ThinkerThunker on RUclips did a video on the P-G film that literally shows Patty has non-human proportions.
Pattison had already published a book about Bigfoot and was now setting out to make a film about Bigfoot, so he had a high motive to film it. They set out to an area where "bigfoot" had been spotted by others recently. I don't know if the bigfoot was real on not, but in my opinion it was not. They couldn't get an actor who was eight to ten feet tall (like a grizzly standing on its hind legs) so they had to make the costume a six foot female. Maybe it was some guy who didn't work for Pattison or Gimlin but was wandering around in a bigfoot costume, pranking people. A very sophisticated costume mind you.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a big screen adaptation made of this story yet. A true-to-life recreation of Roger & Bob's lives before the film, the day of the encounter, how their lives changed afterward (for better or worse), & of course the pop cultural impact of their experience.
That would be a DOPE film. Oh my god
Which made them rich
#Netflix where you at !!
That's an interesting point; it's probably because this film is still so divisive; a film adaptation of the whole story leading up to and including the making of this one-minute film and everything that happened afterward, would ultimately have to come out on either the "real" or "hoax" side, or it wouldn't satisfy any audience. As someone born in the 60s it's interesting to me how much staying power this film has had. I remember hearing about it a couple of times when I was a kid; once I think I saw a snippet of the film in a TV advertisement for some documentary feature. It was confusing to be because it was interspersed with close-up footage of "ape-men" that was obviously fake and made specifically for the documentary, yet I remember the announcer saying something about the film of the creature walking away in the distance being claimed by the filmmaker to be a real "Bigfoot", i.e., some strange creature that was not human. I learned a bit about it in 6th grade social studies class when we did a current affairs unit that covered mysteries and the paranormal, like UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, and Bigfoot. We were encouraged to be sceptical about it, just like other unprovable phenomenon like ghosts and ESP. I never gave much more thought to it until I saw the film again in an episode of the the A & E TV documentary series Ancient Mysteries, in the 1990s. It was shown at the end of a sequence of a number of other videotaped, filmed, or photographed claimed sightings of Bigfoot, all of which had long since been debunked as fakes or just cases of mistaken identity, eg. bears standing on their hind legs, or unusually-shaped tree stumps. It was presented as the only visual evidence that has still not be conclusively proven to be faked. The difference between it and all those other laughably unconvincing pieces of "evidence" was striking. I don't understand how do many people find it so easy to write this film off as just another hoax; they must just refuse to really look at it closely.
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5cithere’s a way they could make a film without it leaning on either side. they did it with the exorcism of emily rose and allowed the audience to decide what really happened.
I'm in shock that I'm attracted to an almost 90 yr old man! I forgot this was about Bigfoot.
Lol maybe he can take u to where the footage was shot at😍😂
LMAO!!!!!👍
Or even take you at the sight...lol
He’s gorgeous!
What a genuine, honest and nice man. Im glad he was part of such an epic experience and it is sad that Patterson didnt live to see how much impact their film had on the world.
he does seem to be Genuine and forth right,he's not going to carry on a hoax for over 55 plus years,he's just the type ,he believes what he saw
@@scottwalker6897 A very profitable hoax. He said so himself.
@@rjl1309 Not a hoax.
@@rjl1309 Gimlin has never said it was a hoax. If you don't believe him that is your business, but don't say he said things he never did.
Roger died not long after the film. Bob especially wouldn't keep any hoax going.
How can you not believe this man? I'm a horse trainer also and Bob understands the lingo of how real horse trainers talk. He's telling the truth.
He sounds like a liar and of course he has to be because if bigfoot was real
We'd have tons of evidence. He keeps mentioning the 'fall colors'. The only problem with that is that is that they're in a conifer forest. There are no fall colors.
@@torreyintahoe there is tons of evidence, footprint casts, audio, tree structures, thousand of sighting reports and the film Roger and Bob made of the creature which no one has replicated even with todays technology. You call him a liar because you don't like what he says and your opinion doesnt count for much
@@jupitermoongauge4055 There’s no evidence. If there was there would be no debate.
@@torreyintahoe either you don't understand what the word evidence is or you are too lazy to do any research, actually im guessing both. The film Roger and Bob made is evidence, it may not be conclusive but if it was fake, how come no one can make a monkey suit that has the same limb proportions or looks anything like the creature in the film ? Even though people have spent thousands trying. Then there are hundreds of footprint casts showing unique dermal ridges and a so called metatarsal break and dimensions well outside of human norms. Then there are audio recordings that under professional analysis can be shown to not belong to any known creature. Then there are tree structures requiring power well beyond that of humans in places no machinery could get to. All of that is evidence. You arrogantly assume you know everything surrounding this subject, it is evident you know virtually nothing.
@@jupitermoongauge4055 I do understand what evidence is. Everything you just listed is circumstantial. None of it is evidence. If there is evidence to support a theory then the theory becomes a fact and it is certainly not a fact that bigfoot exists. If bigfoot did exist we would have found skeletal remains a long time ago. There is no living mammal whose remains we have not found. Do you know what is a fact? The guy who dressed up in the suit for the film admitted to doing so while be given a polygraph. Now that's evidence.
Man I could listen to this guys stories.
It must have been a hell of a roller coaster ride of a life . He was only in his 20 s so he has dealt with all the ups and downs.
He reminds me of my stepdad
We always had so much fun out riding horses and him telling me stories.
Over 50 years since they made the film public, and no one can debunk it.
In fact, with every technological advancement in video stabilization, the added detail has only made the creature in the film more obviously real.
We can see muscle groups flexing, the bare soles of Patty's feet, and her fingers curling and extending with each step -- thats movement of fingers and hands which hang on very long arms.
These details have been studied by the experts in Cryptozoology as well and film making and special effects. They all state that what the film shows could not have been achieved in 1967, and cannot be duplicated now.
Nobody can prove its real.
@@orlfane1622 Its been proven it cant be a human in a suit. But denialists still refuse to accept.
@@lyndoncmp5751 You are full of shit. There is zero proof that this video is authentic. You cling to somebodies opinion that its real.
@@orlfane1622 It has been declared genuine by multiple authorities, Industrial Light and Magic, experts from Disney, Jane Goodall, and more. Do some research.
@@bretthess6376 Declared genuine with no proof. LOL
Thank you Bob for all you have done. My father watched a mother and child walk up a mountain for 5 mins above Lake Tahoe in the spring of 1966 and did not what it was until we watched your film on tv. My Father call me into the room and we watched it on tv and he asked what I saw I said that what we saw at star lake
Let's hear more about what you saw
😂 the lies just keep pouring in.
Is that when your dad was in a mental institution
@@M60gunner1971You are so right.. People just gotta lie. Joe Rogan said it best. People just lie lie lie
@@ScottJenkins-n8dDisrespectful🤡
If you look really close at Patty you can tell its not A costume it’s real.
James Hathorn.....You look so intelligent. Please tell me more.
Well I would if Inew you Ccisco
Only looks real to morons.
If you look even closer you'll see a horizontal line at the top of its thigh, (where the bottom half of the suit meets the top half) oh and a large groove on the right hand side of suit which indicates an oversized suit.
Oh and in case you all forgot, it was filmed in a place called Bluff Creek! Dum dum dum! Y'all been fooled big time suckers!
John Cornell haha look who it is! I find it weird that you keep posting on these videos? Why don’t you do something better with your time ? Ring a bell! Surprised you find any time to reply with that life sized Jeff Meldrum poster behind our door your masterbate too
I was on the fence about Bigfoot, but when this gentleman said after looking at the film " you've got nothing, I saw so much more", you couldn't make that up in a hundred years. This man is legit, and so is patty.
I believe in Bigfoot but this guy is very not believable. He's talking like he's making stuff up,and talks in a way that is something not real
@@marlenemorrow8942 the way he talks is just not genuine.hes talking like he's telling a story about someone and not like he's was there
@@wingedhussar1453 I don’t understand why you say this.
@@wingedhussar1453 i have to disagree with you sir. Maybe he has told his story so many times the past 50 years that what you are hearing may sound rehearsed. But im a bit confused...you say you believe in these creatures, but yet the guy who is in the original film is being interviewed..thats him in the 1967 film, yet you dont believe him??
Either the most historical account by the person who was there is legit, or you dont believe they are real. Please clarify if you will...thank you..
I was on the fence until I saw the updates on the video 📹 where you can see the whole leg, fat and muscle jiggle with each stride and impact with the ground along with the breasts moving up and down for 1967 its impossible. The suites the use now don't even work like that either they use them for mass with padding but don't ripple because the padding does not behave that way only cgi can compete with that 'suit' from 67. If like some claim that was from 67 then where was the guy who who it made and claiming it because its a better 'suit' that anything we have today.
I had the *GREAT PLEASURE* of meeting Roger and Bob at Sacramento City College in Nov. '67 right after they shot this *Historical* film; they were premiering the film at the college. I was able to talk to them after the film showing in a small group. Later in my experience as a seasonal employee of the Forest Service as a Surveyor Tech had many experiences of Bigfoot encounters over the time of living in the forest over a period of a year of living in remote areas!
Thats dope
You met them?!! Shut up. Give us a squatch story why dontcha.
That is AWESOME! As has already been stated, it would be great to hear about your Sasquatch experience(s) as well!
I'm reiterating the request. Let's hear about it. I'm not going to call you a liar. Just like hearing stories about people's experiences.
Over 50 years have passed since the famous Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot film,....it's been studied, analyzed and scrutinized by experts and skeptics alike....and still it passes all the scientific,..anatomical,. and animal characteristics criteria for being genuine.....my belief is that shaky, grainy footage on a sunny day in the fall of 1967, that lasts barely a minute is of a large female Bigfoot.......and that astounding clip as intrigued us all ever since.
So well stated!! I have been and always will be a believer! I pray to see one before I pass and stay vigilant! 👣
If anyone truly wants a chance to encounter a Forrest giant then I suggest Mt Shasta, MT Hood and especially Mt St Helens. Anytime I’ve been in those mountains it’s just a different feeling of not being alone. Very beautiful but mysterious places. Don’t be an idiot and beat on trees, whoop and all that BS or you will never see them. You will only upset them. You don’t need to warn them your there. Just be normal, camp, etc. If they want to let you see them they will.
That film is the most convincing ever and this man is telling the truth
don juan what has that got to do with anything?
he saw a man dressed up....while he had a whiskey hangover.....
LR Lapua that’s actually funny but unfortunately you’re wrong ;)
Thank You It's real, a real small clip of the truth.
ruclips.net/video/sHIfsYGLRnQ/видео.html
its amazing everyone asks for proof on film and when they get it people still cannot believe it this creature walked away not petrified but with distain for people disturbing it going about its own business the look back was a kind of saying keep your distance its power was unmistakable
This man is not making his story up, first of all.. he had no reason to and second..he comes across as a man of integrity. I believe he saw what he said they saw.
Great man and great legacy. They managed to film a true legend, that has been reported about for centuries beforehand as a "Wild Man".
Everyone who has seen these creatures with their own eyes knows he's 100% genuine.
Yet in the 60 years since no one has been able to capture one of these so-called creatures, being so brazen in their comportment, with far more advanced filming equipment, and greater increases in camping and hiking in all of these parks where the creature is supposedly at home. If you really expect people to believe that then that’s fine I guess but I don’t.
I was born and raised in Montana. In college, In 1963, I had a Professor named Dr. Joseph Feathers (obviously Indian), who had a small collection of newspaper reported sightings of Bigfoot. In talking with me about the subject, in his office, outside of class time, he told me something that I will never forget: "White man does not know everything yet." INDEED.
@@johnsullivan6532
Blah, blah, blah
this mans testimony would get you the death penalty in court, so how could you not believe him! very honest man.
Actors and filmographers are good liars
Peter von Feldt, Bob is neither an actor nor a filmmaker. He just went along with Patterson to help with the horses. That was his job. He broke horses for a living.
Peter von Feldt that shows too much ignorance🤣. Guy thought that bob gimlin was an actor and a filmmaker😂. All bob done was help roger out with the expedition and sight the Bigfoot with him, not record the actual footage. Also filmmakers aren’t really good liars🤣
Chris It's real, a real small clip of the truth.
ruclips.net/video/sHIfsYGLRnQ/видео.html
@@kevinblakemore7980 I've seen it, but thanks
This man has good style. Dressed to kill and what a great necklace as well.
Bob is a good man. I shook his hand at an event in Willow Springs, CA. I believe him, 100%
Bob Gimlin was an honest man then and is now. It's sad he had to wait all those years for society to be honest with itself.
He was as crooked as they come...I know and he knows that Roger Patterson was " Bigfoot" I remember he left behind extra footage of him wearing the costume and how him and his partner Hoaxed the story. Paterson had stood 6'7" at the time of the filming.
@@YogaMrDo keep smoking that crack pipe
Honest about what exactly? A hoax and still zero evidence of Bigfoot anywhere? Your best evidence is tree knocks 🤣🤣
@@ryanmiller327 Ryan…the Patterson film is evidence. It’s the only artifact that can’t be proven, nor has it be disproved. All the other crap…I agree with you. Especially with cell phones and drones now. But the PG film is an interesting while provocative just by itself.
@@ryanmiller327 yup.. the whole idea of it is a joke
He could have made himself rich by telling the “truth” about what happened. He’s never done that. He’s had over 50 years to cash in. He’s telling the same story he told in 1967. Do the homework and you’ll see he’s never deviated. Whatever happened out there, he believes what he experienced.
Well at first he described it as being over 6 ft and 300lbs which describes the man that admitted to wearing the suit. Now he says it was over 7ft and 800lbs.
Love his bigfoot neck piece.
He's been a hustler his whole life. He even approached Roger's widow Patricia at his funeral demanding money from the film. When she refused, he sued her in court. Vilma Radford's contract was brought before the judge, and he didn't buy Patricia's claim that it was forged, which means Bob gets paid.
Real stand up guy. They don't build them like that anymore.
You bet!
Super Bee, the bigfoot of muscle cars
@@markochasteeni7560 😆
He is a true original, and an honorable soul for sure. Its unfortunate that he's had to deal with so much negativity since the film came out.
You so right !!!
Even if you don't believe in Bigfoot, doing such a movie is not against the law !!!!!
People are the worst animal on this planet
What a load of crap.
Patterson's wife left him because of his bad reputation from so many people calling him a lier he said on his death bed his film was genuine and this man's story has never changed you can tell he's honest with all the technological Analysis of the film shows it's genuine
wrong
@@rjl1309 no he’s right. Where’s your proof he’s wrong, Also the proportions are too different from a humans for it to be anyone in a cheap 60s monkey suit, also the “suit “looks way better than anything else for the time, so it can’t be a suit.
@@WHOOOSHXDOfficial Well... As a Telecine Colorist, I did the "Mastering" of this film. Patterson's Grandson and Mr. Gimlin both sat in during the session. They both talked freely about the footage, about the fame & money it brought. It was never their original plan to have things blow up as they did. But rode the wave anyway. I'm not saying their is no creature like Bigfoot, but this isn't it.
@@rjl1309 I disagree but very interesting info. I feel like they did catch something real but they dragged it out by talking to people after Patterson’s death. Patterson never admitted any said hoax and said on his death bed the creature was real, Bob even refused to talk for a while. Bob Gimlin very well did appreciate the amount of money he gained but even then he declined $1,000,000 to say it was a hoax because according to him “the creature was real and saying it was a hoax would be dishonest, which he wasn’t.” I’m not saying you’re experience with Gimlin isn’t true, but seeing the proportions and the fact the said suit is way better then anything at the time screams that it’s a real animal, yet the reputation of Patterson kind of ruins the film for some people.
Oh Bob is still looking good for his age. Can you just imagine what it would be like to be him and see what he saw! So cool. We Love you and so sorry that you had to deal with the nonbelievers.
Why can’t interviewers use mics when they ask questions?
I am incredibly surprised to find this.. didn’t know this excited. Though the cameramen would be king gone by now. Wow.. maybe Bigfoot really is out there..
yes Bob is a King you are right about that!!!
Believe it, because it is real.
I always enjoy listening to him talk about what happened to them on that fall day. Brings back my sightings.
People do seem to think it’s simple to lie, there is no way this guy is lying , so many sightings and encounters from very reliable characters, but for some reason the people in the government don’t want people to know anything about these unique creatures...
this man got pranked hard
longest prank ever 🤣 Roger was a conman, and used this man for his hoax, and never told him to make the story more believable
Loved to have a beer and talk to Bob about his life and of course Patty ... Very humble and sincere ... We need more people like Bob Gimlin.
Gary, you would enjoy that. Bob is a very honest forthright man. He is so interesting to be around!
He’s is but severely contradicts his story now from his original interview
@@scottcroteau7375 There is an interview of a guy who says he is the one in the monkey suit. He passed two lie detector tests. Bob hasn't passed any lie detector tests.
@@saulespino2510 that same guy had no idea where the video was shot. He said it was shot in a park, but it wasn’t. He’s been discredited numerous times.
@@sniggity Oh wow, I didn't know that.
I’m currently reading the book “Sasquatch,Legend Meets Science” by Jeff Meldrum.It is a comprehensive study of large ape species and how they could possibly relate to the existence of Bigfoot in North America.Whether you believe or not,it is a good read.
I am certainly interested in the possible existence of Sasquatch,but I am still on the fence as to whether they truly do exist.But when people who have nothing to gain but ridicule come forward with their experiences,I can’t help but think they are being truthful.
nice. but ape is not a great theory of sasquatch. no primate dna has ever been found in thses areas with sightings
They are closer to human than ape. Humans mixed with an unknown dna sequence
I know, how in the world can we still, in 2024, have a giant ape species living in remote wilderness areas in the world, NOT YET scientifically identified/classified, but that is exactly what we have, believe it or not.