The best detailed comparison I've ever seen between the Sigma and Sony 35mm 1.4. I will definitely get the Sony GM because of its sharpness and the green fringing on sigma. Thank you !
Great review. When I bought the Sigma 30mm 1.4 for the Sony A6500. I realized what a great match the two are. Sigma has a color cast that to me matches perfectly with Sony’s biting colors. Owning the Sony 35mm 1.8 it’s hard to justify the upgrade. Going to use the force to fight the gear acquisition syndrome and focus on content. Great time to get into e-mount though.
Wide open is where I want to shoot the 1.4 lens. No doubt after seeing half a dozen reviews, that the Sony has better contrast, is sharper across the whole frame, does better in close focusing. Also as noted the Sony is better with Sony bodies I have the A9 so this focus consistancy and speed and lock on matters. I also have the L mount SL2 Leica, but since its a way bigger camera, I just bought the Sigma F2 in L mount. Most fringing can be fixed but color , contrast especially and lock on and eye focus issues can ruin a shot and are harder to correct. The Bokeh is better with the 11 blade Sony, I like the smaller size on the smaller Sony bodies so when the prices come down I will get the GM it is worth the extra money.
I commented on a different old video I just take street photos I do take night photos do i go f1.4 or f2 The f2 is light and easy to carry but the f1.4 gets more light. Any advice?
I just got the A1 paired with 24 GM and shot backlit wide open and had a lot of chromatic aberration. Was able to correct the purple fringing in post, but the greens are still there. Going to have to test this a bit more. But I can't even remember having this issue with my Panasonic S pro lenses. Is this the compromise of small lenses? Or the use of aps-c mode? Because I hoped the aps-c mode would allow me to skip the 35mm with 50MP.
@@TECH360TV There was a time when I went out with a 25/50/75 kit, using Zeiss ZM and Voigtlander primes. These days I'm more 21/35/50, but 24/25 is a great walkaround focal length.
Great review as always! By the way, the next time you are giving feedback to Sigma, can you please tell to bring these amazing Art and Contemporary I-Series to other mounts like Nikon Z please? Pretty please? I have been drooling for the Contemporary I-Series a lot for my Nikon Z6!
Why is everyone comparing the new Sigma with the GM Sony and not the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 from Sony which dropped in price and is now the direct contendor...?
I have realised that the Sigma’s 35mm have notable chromatic aberrations of cyan and amber colour fringing when In close focusing distance. It is due to the size of the lens and the performance of close distance focusing. ~ Gerald Undone
Too big .. too heavy. but it's cheap though. this new sigma .. reminds me of the old 35 ZA that i had for years.. and the reason why i sell it and go for the GM is because GM is just better in every ways..
Bobbi you talk too fast, just one coffee in the morning please. Pace your speech somewhere between Chris Nichols and Hugh Brownstone would be about the right speed
The best detailed comparison I've ever seen between the Sigma and Sony 35mm 1.4. I will definitely get the Sony GM because of its sharpness and the green fringing on sigma. Thank you !
You’re one of the best photo equipment reviewed on RUclips, period!
Thank you 🙏
I use this sigma lens and it is fantastic together with my Sony a7RIII.
Great review !!!! Thanks
Thanks for watching!!
hi! thank you for the video! i enjoyed a lot. can i get what camera and lens did you use for recording this video? 😊
Awesome review!
Thanks Clarence!
Great review. When I bought the Sigma 30mm 1.4 for the Sony A6500. I realized what a great match the two are. Sigma has a color cast that to me matches perfectly with Sony’s biting colors. Owning the Sony 35mm 1.8 it’s hard to justify the upgrade. Going to use the force to fight the gear acquisition syndrome and focus on content. Great time to get into e-mount though.
Thanks for watching. Yes I agree so far 2021 is the year of the E Mount. Let’s see what happens in the later part of the year
Wide open is where I want to shoot the 1.4 lens. No doubt after seeing half a dozen reviews, that the Sony has better contrast, is sharper
across the whole frame, does better in close focusing. Also as noted the Sony is better with Sony bodies I have the A9 so this focus consistancy and speed and lock on matters. I also have the L mount SL2 Leica, but since its a way bigger camera, I just bought
the Sigma F2 in L mount. Most fringing can be fixed but color , contrast especially and lock on and eye focus issues can ruin a shot and
are harder to correct. The Bokeh is better with the 11 blade Sony, I like the smaller size on the smaller Sony bodies so when the prices come down I will get the GM it is worth the extra money.
best reviewer on youtube!
Love your guys review and was thinking about getting this lens. The E
Thanks for the support
Thanks for watching
Great review! This will find a home on one of my SL2S bodies. Love my 85 Sigma, tho the 75 APO is a beast so is the cost.
Thanks Dwayne. Think it will work nicely on it
Yup. This will pair nice with my SL2. And yes the 75 SL APO is crazy. Only Leica lens I can afford. Hail to Sigma for an affordable alternative.
I commented on a different old video I just take street photos I do take night photos do i go f1.4 or f2 The f2 is light and easy to carry but the f1.4 gets more light. Any advice?
When is that GFX100S and GF80mm F1.7 review coming out?? 😉
Great review as usual Bobby! 👍
Thanks. Coming soon!
So Sigma is moving away from the bazooka lenses now, I have the 85mm 1.4 DG DN very nice and love its size and weight. This 35mm looks good too.
Yes they are moving away from them it seems
I just got the A1 paired with 24 GM and shot backlit wide open and had a lot of chromatic aberration. Was able to correct the purple fringing in post, but the greens are still there. Going to have to test this a bit more.
But I can't even remember having this issue with my Panasonic S pro lenses. Is this the compromise of small lenses? Or the use of aps-c mode? Because I hoped the aps-c mode would allow me to skip the 35mm with 50MP.
Try shooting in full frame mode. Lumix S pro lens’s are very good so it could also be a Lens issue but the recent Sony lenses are very impressive
Lol cropping in doesn’t replace a lens. It’s just the same fov. Nothing else about the lens will be equivalent in terms of optics.
another good video, you'd rather work with a 24 or 35? what do you think?
what's the best combo for you?
fixed focal?
thanks for your return
Thanks Roland. Personally I like 24 and a 50 combo but that’s just me.
@@TECH360TV There was a time when I went out with a 25/50/75 kit, using Zeiss ZM and Voigtlander primes. These days I'm more 21/35/50, but 24/25 is a great walkaround focal length.
Great review as always! By the way, the next time you are giving feedback to Sigma, can you please tell to bring these amazing Art and Contemporary I-Series to other mounts like Nikon Z please? Pretty please? I have been drooling for the Contemporary I-Series a lot for my Nikon Z6!
Thanks!! I’ve requested. All I’ve heard is they are looking at options but nothing confirmed.
Why is everyone comparing the new Sigma with the GM Sony and not the Zeiss 35mm 1.4 from Sony which dropped in price and is now the direct contendor...?
"Is it worth it to pay a little bit more" - Since when 80% more is a "little bit"?
do not know when the sony 35mm 1.4 will be available in stores?
I don’t as of yet
May 14 announced
@@TECH360TV May 14 announced
Really hoping sigma bring out a new 50mm f1.4/f1.2 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
I’m all for that
As long as it is smaller and lighter than the 50mm Art in L mount, I'll be there.
Wow in Singapre China town...
I like the flat look in your videos.....it sets different mood...
When I look you look aame as the Stephen Fleming
Thanks for watching. We have a slightly different look but thanks :)
Replace my Sony Fe 35mm with this?🤔...Mainly do video
Nice review. Sigma needs IS on their lenses to be a competitive cinema option
Thanks for watching. Yeah IS on some lenses would be good
Not very convinced after watching Gerald's video. Then again for 500 bucks less it's pretty nice
For the 500 dollar savings if you find the image quality to your liking then it’s worth it.
Sigma DG DN 35 1.4 has got severe barrel distortion
He sounds like he is a reporter in a crime scene 🤭
Bobby Tonelli is an American actor 😊👀
I have realised that the Sigma’s 35mm have notable chromatic aberrations of cyan and amber colour fringing when In close focusing distance. It is due to the size of the lens and the performance of close distance focusing. ~ Gerald Undone
Yes I stated this is a characteristic of the lens in this review
Too big .. too heavy. but it's cheap though. this new sigma .. reminds me of the old 35 ZA that i had for years.. and the reason why i sell it and go for the GM is because GM is just better in every ways..
Understand. If weight snd size is an issue than the Sony is a good choice.
Sony is king but Sigma is more than good enough. Sony is pixel peepers delight
Yeah, incremental but a lot more to pay
Sony lenses are overpriced.
Is your mask just made of mesh??
No. Different materials. You can opt to have filters inside or not depending.
I still think he should be reviewing superbikes instead of cameras!
Haha why?
Bobbi you talk too fast, just one coffee in the morning please. Pace your speech somewhere between Chris Nichols and Hugh Brownstone
would be about the right speed
Thanks for the feedback. Will take note
@@TECH360TVi love your content. English is my second language but I could follow just fine