I'm glad to hear that Lily Gladstone is great in the movie. This seems like a great breakout role with international acclaim for her. The Wolf of Wall Street had Margor Robbie in her breakout role, Killers Of The Flower Moon will do the same for Lily
I'm not entirely certain that "The Wolf of Wall Street" was Robbie's breakout role. It got her attention, definitely, but I usually forget she was in it. It seems like her subsequent work, playing "Harley Quinn" and then her Oscar nominations, is what catapulted her to stardom. (and after appearing in two of the biggest financial and critical bombs of last fall, we'll see how long that lasts....) I see people in the thread here implying that Gladstone will be hampered for not being white. I'm not denying the lingering specter of racism in our culture, but just in the last five years the cinema/television world has changed, there are many non-white actresses breaking through and doing excellent work. I don't see why that *has to be* an unequivocal barrier for her, as far as being a working actress. I hate to say it, but it's likely the fact that she's not traditionally beautiful, that's what will likely prevent her from being "a star". But honestly who cares? Stardom is glib and nearly *always* transitory. I find the focus on "stardom" to be generally toxic, it's a despicable metric. Depending on her range as an actress, the exposure from this film could result in Gladstone working on various projects into old age. Maybe not as a "star", but surely playing a variety of character roles. It's up to her, really. Can't wait to see what she does with this role. In the trailer she's remarkably powerful in just reaction shots. That bodes well.
@@ikexbankai so she has more value? We’re talking about acting. No one is watching this movie thinking about who is the most attractive. Such shallow people out here.
You people really love awards show. Constantly talking oscars like it's the end all be all deciding factor. You they campaign for awards right so it's really an arse kisser contest more then anything else.
I was not surprised that this movie got good feedback. But I was surprised that it got near perfect reception. Killers Of The Flower Moon is a movie that is going to compete for Oscar gold. Watch out Nolan.
Nope, "near perfect reception" it is not. Even this review is an example of that: Oscar Expert bro' notices flaws in the direction, script and editing.
I’ve seen a lot of reviews where people have reservations about it as a whole but they’re kinda just giving Scorsese the benefit of the doubt and a lot of slack bc it’s his probably his last movie
@@ktom5262 he also thought The Irishman was flawed, I didn't agree with his opinions on that film, that was an insanely great film for me. The way he described The Irishman is what I was expecting the film to be, but when I watched it for myself, I genuinely just found it a great film among Scorcese's best. If this is anything like that, I'm in.
You bring up some fascinating talking points about the film's focus and Gladstone's character and interpretation. Podcast and RUclips reviews are so often so much more enlightening and to the point than the written reviews, putting things in much plainer terms. Great work!
I’m fully prepared to love this because it ticks so many boxes for me and I absolutely need DeNiro and Scorsese to win supporting & director. DeNiro deserves it so much
TOTALLY AGREE! De Niro - one of THE most influential actors ever, certainly since the 70s - deserves as many Oscars as they can give him. This stuff doesn't mean anything, but he is most definitely a guy who should be a record holder. When Waltz won for "Django", I was shocked, I think De Niro was shocked too. No offense to Christoph Waltz, but that should have been Bobby D's third Oscar, most definitely.
I mean to be fair, lol...DeNiro's already got a couple of Oscars. And Scorsese's got his (for what I feel is one of his weakest films, but that's just me...) I just hope this film is as good as the trailer seems. I've been anxiously awaiting it since it was announced.
Lily Gladstone has always managed to captivate me with her performances and I am glad to hear that you loved her performance. She surely deserves multiple awards not just Oscar. She is magic on screen
From the film's synopsis, I would prefer to see more Native American cast involved not as a background but as actual characters to balance out the main cast. As you mentioned, the presence of a character played by Lily Gladstone is less developed, perpetuating an old trope about Native American women in films. Glad the story was taken on a big screen, at least.
Perhaps, Lily Gladstone played this role as a native plays a role of a native instead of how a white person would plays the part of a native. I am eager to see the film.
As an indigenous person, I wish native people would have had more involvement out of my selfish desire to see more representation but I think the movie achieves what native people feel. A struggle that’s very ours and it’s not to be put out there for people to “be in our shoes” for the movie and then continue their life of privilege. I think it’s still keeps outsiders from appropriating and feel like they understand when they just cant.
@jaysongarcia1268 Lily Gladstone blew me away with this performance. I did kind of feel similarly to the Oscar expert though. Thanks for this perspective!
I definitely agree that it’s fair to be worried about a more showy performance overtaking Gladstone, but just looking at the massive hype that’s been built for her + the way she’s already being campaigned (like she’s EVERYWHERE) I think she might just be it this year.
Interesting takes on Mollie’s character possibly being naive - after Ernest admitted during the trial that he was involved, she wouldn’t believe it. I believe she was quoted saying, “not my Ernest, not my Ernest.” I think the realization would have been too much to take, including her realizing the Shoun brothers were poisoning her and likely poisoned her mother as well who died a few years prior under their care.
Thank you for watching this trailer. I'm Osage. The history of the book and movie "is"(not was) much deeper. It still goes on to this very day. My late grandpa was born in 1931. I'm so fortunate and blessed that my linage wasn't directly affected. The wolves probably numbered in the thousands. There is great tragedy in this, but there is also great hope. My family is but 1 story. There are countless others who have triumphed. I'm so glad this movie is coming out. I hope other directors start doing this with other native American tribes.
I get the feeling that the three films that are most likely going to win the Oscar's for best pic will be Oppenheimer, Killers of the Flower Moon, or Past Lives. These three films, imo, are the strongest contenders for best pic.
Apparently DiCaprio wad originally cast as the fbi agent investigating the murders, and when the filming was shut down for Covid, DiCaprio spearheaded a rewriting of the script to focus more on his current character
I think he's referring to a certain creative choice Scorcese took with the presentation of the information at the end, not to the actual content of the narrative
@@knurdyob I don’t know if you’ve read the book or not, and I don’t mean to accuse you of ignorance or start an argument, but from what I’ve heard it doesn’t drift too far from Earnest’s own testimony. Maybe that’s BS, I wasn’t there. But this film was way more accurate than goodfellas, historically speaking.
@@anabathrum again I don't think the guy on the video was refering to the content itself, but to how Scorcese chose to present the ending. I've heard that the film ends with an epilogue which detaches us from the actual conflict and summarizes the consequences of this story across the decades that followed, sort of like in a documentary, with a narrator telling us what happened, or something along those lines. Regardless of what actually happens in the film, I've heard the ending will be creatively somewhat unconventional in how it presents the information. The accuracy of the events depicted in the film is irrelevant to this topic, what is being discussed regarding the ending is the presentation choices, not the plot
People always seem to appreciate Scorsese films more a few years later. Casino was mixed reviews at the time. We expect them to be as good as something else rather than what they are. I’m going to keep an open mind.
Bullshit. I saw Casino the day it opened, loved it. I've never seen a Scorsese movie that I DIDN'T like.....and then liked later. That's never happened. Other directors yes, but never Marty.. There are lots of his movies I don't think much of (especially post Casino), and lots of his movies are among my top faves, but none of those movies have changed for me upon repeated viewings. In fact I just watched half of Bringing Out The Dead recently and it's just a lousy as it was in the 90s! lol. Casino STILL has mixed reviews. PS: The mixed reviews were mostly about rehashing Goodfellas, which is fair. Didn't bother me, but I can see where that would be someone's gripe. That and the normal "it's too violent, it's too long" that he always gets.
@@TTM9691 The critic Jonathan Rosenbaum also complained about Scorsese using the music from Contempt in Casino, calling it very tacky, and I agree. He uses the music over the final monologue to sell the content of the monologue, that something was lost by the regulation of sin city by the banks. Yeah, maybe if you were there, but it means absolutely nothing to the rest of us. The montage at the end of Babylon is the same kind of a fail (but actually it doesn't come across as a fail in Casino, because of the feeling contained in the music, but it's tacky to appropriate the power of that music, just as Kim Novak was right to complain about the use of Vertigo's Love Theme in the ten years later forgotten movie, The Artist).
@@TTM9691 I love "Bringing Out the Dead", personally. I think it's one of his most unfortunately overlooked films. Thematically it fits right in with much of the rest of his filmography, particularly "The Last Temptation of Christ" and "Shutter Island", a good man haunted by burdens (and visions) he doesn't believe he can carry anymore, and the tragic self-destruction that ensues. Great soundtrack too.
@@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 It's a piece of crap, it doesn't matter "thematically", it's a piece of crap. It DOESN'T fit in with the rest of his work in that it is COMPLETELY and idiotically unrealistic. Cage is horrible in it, totally miscast (and I love Cage, and Leo too. Leo is often miscast in his movies as well. Howard Hughes? LOL), Sorry, doofus, but putting a bunch of Hollywood actors in a NYC movie just doesn't cut it. You must live in flyover country where they buy this crap. All I can say is: a person who tells me "Bringing Out The Dead" is anything other than a piece of crap should never be listened to, ever, at least about what makes a good film. Get some taste.
I loved the film. In Scorsese's defence, there is very little documentary information out there on Molly and her thoughts/feelings. I think Scorsese felt it would be disrespectful to speculate or ventriloquize on behalf of the Osage characters
Thank you! I'm not seeing what others are saying about it being a masterpiece. I much preferred the subtle performances of Lily Gladstone and Jesse Plemons to the Capital-A *Acting* of DiCaprio and De Niro.
I really didn’t like The Irishman but this seems more interesting and has Leo. Hoping Apple does some sort of theatrical release because I’d love to see it on the big screen!
Oscars are still only awarded to films that get a theatrical release, so there was never any doubt that it would. I saw The Irishman and Roma on the big screen and I think that made a big difference. There were completely engrossing.
I appreciate your review. I had wanted a more Osage perspective. Especially as Scorsese did it well according to your review. Having something new and different in Scorsese’s work should be focused on. I will still go see it, but I will be prepared for not as much Osage perspective as I had hoped.
Curious to know if this could win Adapted Screenplay or not unless if the category isn’t super competitive this year. I could see it as the front runner but also looking back to Scorsese films post The Departed like Hugo, The Wolf of Wall Street and The Irishman. Those films didn’t win Screenplay so I’m 50/50 predicting this for a win or not. If I can see anything else winning Adapted Screenplay it would be Oppenheimer. The recent trailer has a lot of conversation scenes focusing on the urgency of the Trinity Test and maybe Nolan has a chance to win an Oscar in that category.
They largely ignored Silence because the studio fucked up the campaign. Apple TV+, on the other hand, will absolutely put all of their chips into this basket and make sure this gets the campaign it deserves.
I'm still pissed about the reception "Silence" received. An incredibly beautiful, compelling film. My personal theory is that, after Trump's election in 2016, the kinds of people who see Scorsese's films maybe (?) weren't feeling a narrative revolving around faith. Faith is too often associated with conservatism, for better or worse. Andrew Garfield's performance is mind-bogglingly powerful and when he WAS nominated that year but for "Hacksaw Ridge", it was so disappointing. Garfield went to places film actors don't usually go to in "Silence". It really breaks my heart how overlooked it was. I'm heartened to consistently see people online sticking up for it though.
@@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 I thought Garfield's performance was the weak link. Just my opinion. I feel a Ben Wishaw or Cillian Murphy in that role would have elevated the film.
Assuming Scorsese is nominated for best director, he has now made 9 narrative feature films since 2002 and 7 have been nominated in the category. Same for best picture. Wow.
If and when Scorsese gets nominated for Best Director for Killer of the Flower Moon, he will officially be the 2nd highest nominated Director in Hollywood History with 10 nominations followed closely at number 3 by Spielberg with 9 nominations.
completely agree with you. There is so much hype for the movie and some will call anything Scorsese does a 5 star masterwork. He's one of my favorite directors but those stan reactions can seem disingenuous and getting caught in the hype.
All due respect, I know people seem to like him and I'm not knocking anyone personally, but I don't get Jessie Plemons. I just don't get him. I understand he's part of this EG Marshall, Jerry Orbach, Chishu Ryu-school of "subtle stone face acting", and I understand the place for that. I suppose I just don't understand the acclaim. I just personally haven't seen the range enough in Plemons' work to justify the admiration I see. He plays....him. Which is fine, you can count on that and that's fine. But the actors of his generation who I feel are legitimately great actors, Michael Fassbender, Tom Hardy, James McAvoy, those guys DO have range. I just don't see Plemons anywhere _close_ to those guys. I don't know. Maybe I haven't seen enough of his work. He was funny in "The Irishman", I'll give him that.
Supporting actor with Troy and ke they have gone with the heart and soul of the film. So I feel like they could go for the husband in past lives. Or gosling in Barbie. I currently have Deniro Magaro Gosling As my top 3 supporting actors
The 'weirdly Lynchian' room where DeNiro gives DiCaprio a beating was full of freemason imagery and symbolism. The two pillars at the center, checkered floor, and a bunch of 'G's and square+compass engravings. Hale also says in that scene that he is a 32nd degree freemason and it really stood out to me how Scorsese included the fact that Hale was a freemason of the highest degree and why he decided to do so. The movie is not only filled with traditional Osage and then also Catholic imagery and depiction of rituals, but has this one short quick scene entirely set in a masonic room where the main villain reveals he is a 32nd degree mason, and then it is never brought up again (as far as I noticed).
From the book, Molly didnt think that her husband had anything to do with it. Not even after she escaped death. So no, she had no idea of the wolves. The Osage didnt even know why they were targeted. A number of the murders went un noticed even by the FBI until after the trial. Others were killed in a non direct murderous fashion. Also one of the wolves was the person conducting the autopsy. Read the book before you complain about the movie. Molly had no forsight until it was explained to her what was happening. She took noticed more about the white supremacy she encountered & the sly racism hurled her way. She was rich with black and white severants. White folks didnt take kindly to her hiring white severants. As the Murders hit closer to home. She withdrew from society. Out of fear and reasonable paranoia. But she never came close to realizing her husband and sister's husband were the killers.
Idk if its because i watched it on my laptop and some headphones and not in the theater, but a lot of the sound felt off, like some dialogue was blatantly added or altered. Also i wasnt crazy about the fraser performance Also after reading that the violence was dialed down (mollie was being poisoned w arsenic etc.) just so that ernest can have this weird grey area about love when it was just insane abuse puts a sour taste in my mouth. Also i wish they cut to mollie reacting to ernest’s testimony
Hey was wondering if you could please start scheduling these if possible to tell us when u r next uploading , hope it’s not too much o an ask keep at it 👍
5:06 - that editing must reflect a definite directorial choice, what would have been 'powerful' to you is not the kind of powerful the director wanted, and maybe you were supposed to feel that way, more distant from that character. I don't think your brain 'itching' for it necessarily means it's the best artistic choice
@@sebastiano728 choices like that are for precise effect. Like when I watch a claustrophobic movie like Rear Window, obviously my brain 'itches' for the camera to leave the apartment, but the whole power of the movie comes from the fact that it never does
@@helvete_ingres4717 Have you seen the film? Even if you had, I can't see how you can claim to know what effect Scorsese aimed to go for. No film or director is above critique, and surely Scorsese didn't want the audience to feel like the indigenous community was underrepresented, as was The Oscar Expert's experience during that part of his review.
i know where you're coming from in regards on giving more to the Osage people...BUT, it's a business after all...and Gladstone doesn't sell movies, DiCaprio does.
greatest living director, incredible cast, 200m budget, riveting true crime historical story, incredible cinematography and score composed by Robbie Roberton of The Band
Daniel Brooke’s is probably gonna be showerer. But I feel like gladstone could do it and win the Oscar. But I could see Brooke’s and gladstone sweep the season.
@@igorsilva3657 Social film drama is a film genre that moves and inspires people to change policy, practice and individual behaviour. A dramatic, sensitive and authentic treatment of social issues, which powerfully connects audiences to the emotions and people that lie behind our assumptions, stereotypes and prejudices From Google A Highly Snooze fest genre mostly made with zero entertainment value or rather than sending messages. Oscar adores this genre 🤣
@@ikateeo I am brown Indian. Stop assuming and Calling out people for r******sm without any good reason. Your kind is one of the reasons why the word loses its real value
Yeah. I really loved him as Todd in breaking bad, and wanted to see him shine. And yes, Tom White was so important in the book. I shed a tear when I read that he part of his left forearm blown off and got left to die, and almost stopped reading once I read that J. Edgar Hoover couldn’t give much of a shit for an Angel like Tom. Compared to Ernest he’s a million times more important. I would have preferred if the film was from the perspective of the FBI primarily, not the osage or the Hale’s team.
@@juanjoyaborja.3054 nah but ernest and mollie's relationship was the more interesting angle to take to ensure this was refreshing and actually did something boundary-pushing. tom white as lead would have just been another crime procedural with stoic lawman. it was more important that the Osage gave input and were allowed to have a guiding hand on this project so it actually does their past justice in film. the book is entirely different and I'm not critiquing that, two entirely different mediums
@@burritogamer3984 I understand. But Tom White was just so much more than a “stoic lawman”, his backstory as a Texas Ranger, his relationship with J. Edgar Hoover, the work he did to finally bring down Hale, and his life after that were all so captivating. I would kill to see it portrayed on the big screen. But I can see why an angle more focused on the Osage would be better, like you said.
Saying that people want to call everything Scorcese does a masterpiece is disregarding their opinions as valid and thinking too highly of yourself’s don’t you think? It doesn’t matter if you don’t agree.
We have our ver sad tragic story an warriors victory song! That really happened five years later of the great depression of 1931! On the crow creek sioux Indian reservation of SD half a northwest of the town stephan. In a long narrow valley just below the hilly prairie land country along the beautiful Missouri River. A large encampment over sixty to eighty hunkpati Dakota sioux people still definitely living on Cheney rush encampment. It actually trigger started the Buffalo County war or the Great war for the northern part of the reservation! In the spring of 1931 the continued harassment by the local towns people and the ranchers in the northern part of the reservation! During the time of the sooner policy act the reservation land take over of the better half of the 20th century! On the morning of a hot summer day of August 1931 the Dakota sioux Indian men left for a hunting trip on the other side of the reservation. Leaving their entire families and young pregnant young ladies at the Cheney rush encampment site. Later on the same day a large party of over hundred American civilians intruders arrived there with guns and rifles very unannounced! They seriously wanted to take away the Dakota sioux Indian people's traditional Buffalo hunting grounds and our rich fertile farm lands along the beautiful Missouri River! The guilty murderous intruders would brutal kill the entire Dakota sioux Indian people poor innocent lives there! The elders were young children at the time saw an witness the tragedy unfolded there will hiding a safe distance away. Many years later they told the story well crying and wipt of the very sad brutal Cheney rush massacre, the second sand creek massacre of 1864! The only tragic massacre in the us history someone tried to cover up the evidence that it never happened there! There's no memorial site because of the forgotten fallen Dakota sioux Indian people who wrongfully slaughtered there! The American intruders built a huge fire an burned the poor Dakota sioux Indian bodies to burned ashes remains! Then they moved the burned ashes remains north to the two small rolling hills of the 1930s site! The one hill on the left side. The children want an told everyone on the reservation what happened to their own Dakota sioux Indian encampment who were innocent murdered there! The Dakota sioux Indian men also heard the very sad tragic story after returning from a hunting trip! The Dakota sioux Indian men's hearts were broken from their loved ones who were wrongfully brutality murdered at the Cheney rush massacre site! The very next day over three hundred angered Dakota sioux Indian warriors were coming ready to fight against the American guilty murderous intruders! On the prairie land country along near the massacre site the American civilians would face the great very impressive enemy warriors numbers coming from a great distance away! The American civilians intruders were surprised to see so many more warriors were arriving there! Iron Nation's kul wicasa oyate Lakota sioux Indian warriors probably may have assisted in the fierce fighting to! In the running battle into a full retreat probably more Americans civilians were killed in the fierce fighting battlefield! Dust would rise up from the horses hooves made a great impressive very intense bloody conflict battlefield scene! In the sioux warriors favor the rest of the defeated wounded weakened American murderous intruders escaped or fled back across the reservation border lands! To their own ranches and towns never wanting to take back the hunkpati Dakota sioux people's traditional reservation Buffalo hunting grounds and our rich fertile farm lands along the beautiful Missouri River. The last forgotten tragedy of the 20th century and the last brave Dakota and Lakota sioux warriors true victory song of the hot summers days on August of 1931! The last great sioux victory after the little bighorn victory June 25,1876 the retribution for the poor lost innocent murdered lives at the brutal Cheney rush massacre site! Just because the wounded knee massacre of 1890 had ended doesn't mean the brutal killings wouldn't stop there! It just moved to another place! The Osage Indian murders an the Cheney rush bloody conflict are two different stories of the early twenty century! The Cheney rush massacre victory site is still there today half a mile northwest from the town stephan SD along the highway to the capital of Pierre SD! The only Dakota sioux Indian bloody conflict east of the beautiful Missouri River of South Dakota! Many decades after the Indian Wars had ended! My historical information for today. Have a great fabulous wonderful day.
Based on you guys' reviews, I think it's a good movie but still not the kind of movie that's really impressive and game changing like Parasite or EEAAO. I think BD+Lily+A few techs will be possible for its Oscar chance.
Things to remember when going to see this movie all the way in October. 1. It's a movie. 2. History is history. It's good to acknowledge history but *don't* make it a just cause to go and "re slice" the scar of systematic racism outrage. Just leave the healed scar where its at. It's not like re scarring yourself for something that happened all the way back in 1918. Just watch it and learn from it *without* the drama.
Glad to hear Fraser’s performance was good. Another critic tore him apart saying he was an “embarrassment” compared to Lithgow. Funny how a 5 minute performance is gonna be as divisive as his Oscar winning role. Why do you think people hate (or will hate) his performance?
How "good" could a 5 minute performance be? He only got the role (2 years ago) because his retiring agent called in a favor from the casting director. His new agent isn't getting any offers. Buying the Oscar vote only got him a playmate for his Rick O'Connell doll.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
How many wolves did you see in this picture? 🐺🐺🐺
That should have been the question
😂😂😂😂
I'm glad to hear that Lily Gladstone is great in the movie. This seems like a great breakout role with international acclaim for her. The Wolf of Wall Street had Margor Robbie in her breakout role, Killers Of The Flower Moon will do the same for Lily
Hopefully.... But Robbie is white
Let’s remember that Robbie is a very transitionally attractive WHITE woman.
I'm not entirely certain that "The Wolf of Wall Street" was Robbie's breakout role. It got her attention, definitely, but I usually forget she was in it. It seems like her subsequent work, playing "Harley Quinn" and then her Oscar nominations, is what catapulted her to stardom.
(and after appearing in two of the biggest financial and critical bombs of last fall, we'll see how long that lasts....)
I see people in the thread here implying that Gladstone will be hampered for not being white. I'm not denying the lingering specter of racism in our culture, but just in the last five years the cinema/television world has changed, there are many non-white actresses breaking through and doing excellent work. I don't see why that *has to be* an unequivocal barrier for her, as far as being a working actress.
I hate to say it, but it's likely the fact that she's not traditionally beautiful, that's what will likely prevent her from being "a star". But honestly who cares? Stardom is glib and nearly *always* transitory. I find the focus on "stardom" to be generally toxic, it's a despicable metric. Depending on her range as an actress, the exposure from this film could result in Gladstone working on various projects into old age. Maybe not as a "star", but surely playing a variety of character roles.
It's up to her, really. Can't wait to see what she does with this role. In the trailer she's remarkably powerful in just reaction shots. That bodes well.
@@showbizroxs okay?
@@ikexbankai so she has more value? We’re talking about acting. No one is watching this movie thinking about who is the most attractive. Such shallow people out here.
Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio have been long overdue for a second Oscar, this seems like a big chance for them to win
DiCaprio overdue?
De Niro hasn't won since Raging Bull!!
You people really love awards show. Constantly talking oscars like it's the end all be all deciding factor. You they campaign for awards right so it's really an arse kisser contest more then anything else.
long overdue lmao
Dicaprio win a career oscar 2016. Had he won before he wouldn't had won for The Revenant
Scorsese and DeNiro are overdue for another oscar gold.
This is a big one
I was not surprised that this movie got good feedback.
But I was surprised that it got near perfect reception.
Killers Of The Flower Moon is a movie that is going to compete for Oscar gold. Watch out Nolan.
Nope, "near perfect reception" it is not. Even this review is an example of that: Oscar Expert bro' notices flaws in the direction, script and editing.
@@ktom5262 this is like his opinion though. Also there's not a movie that everyone calls flawless.
I’ve seen a lot of reviews where people have reservations about it as a whole but they’re kinda just giving Scorsese the benefit of the doubt and a lot of slack bc it’s his probably his last movie
@@RB-.- Scorsese's last movie? What!?
@@ktom5262 he also thought The Irishman was flawed, I didn't agree with his opinions on that film, that was an insanely great film for me. The way he described The Irishman is what I was expecting the film to be, but when I watched it for myself, I genuinely just found it a great film among Scorcese's best. If this is anything like that, I'm in.
You bring up some fascinating talking points about the film's focus and Gladstone's character and interpretation. Podcast and RUclips reviews are so often so much more enlightening and to the point than the written reviews, putting things in much plainer terms. Great work!
I’m fully prepared to love this because it ticks so many boxes for me and I absolutely need DeNiro and Scorsese to win supporting & director. DeNiro deserves it so much
TOTALLY AGREE! De Niro - one of THE most influential actors ever, certainly since the 70s - deserves as many Oscars as they can give him. This stuff doesn't mean anything, but he is most definitely a guy who should be a record holder. When Waltz won for "Django", I was shocked, I think De Niro was shocked too. No offense to Christoph Waltz, but that should have been Bobby D's third Oscar, most definitely.
But you haven’t seen it… how do you know De Niro is deserving?
I mean to be fair, lol...DeNiro's already got a couple of Oscars. And Scorsese's got his (for what I feel is one of his weakest films, but that's just me...)
I just hope this film is as good as the trailer seems. I've been anxiously awaiting it since it was announced.
"Ticked so many boxes" Spoken like a true Liberal. I'm sure you'll just love this garbage film.
Lily Gladstone has always managed to captivate me with her performances and I am glad to hear that you loved her performance. She surely deserves multiple awards not just Oscar. She is magic on screen
From the film's synopsis, I would prefer to see more Native American cast involved not as a background but as actual characters to balance out the main cast. As you mentioned, the presence of a character played by Lily Gladstone is less developed, perpetuating an old trope about Native American women in films. Glad the story was taken on a big screen, at least.
Perhaps, Lily Gladstone played this role as a native plays a role of a native instead of how a white person would plays the part of a native. I am eager to see the film.
As an indigenous person, I wish native people would have had more involvement out of my selfish desire to see more representation but I think the movie achieves what native people feel.
A struggle that’s very ours and it’s not to be put out there for people to “be in our shoes” for the movie and then continue their life of privilege. I think it’s still keeps outsiders from appropriating and feel like they understand when they just cant.
@jaysongarcia1268 Lily Gladstone blew me away with this performance. I did kind of feel similarly to the Oscar expert though. Thanks for this perspective!
I definitely agree that it’s fair to be worried about a more showy performance overtaking Gladstone, but just looking at the massive hype that’s been built for her + the way she’s already being campaigned (like she’s EVERYWHERE) I think she might just be it this year.
Daniel Brooke’s has a shot for the color purple. Her role is showerer
@@gabrielcastaneda9700 I fear (based on what I’ve heard about the film) that she and Henson may have too equal roles.
@@nate-it9xq Brooke’s was strong for the Tony but she was also going up against the craze of hamlton
@@nate-it9xq I wonder if with the 85 film Oprah and Margaret did the same
@Gabriel Castaneda Oprah was expected to win. But yes it’s very possible she and Margaret split the vote
Interesting takes on Mollie’s character possibly being naive - after Ernest admitted during the trial that he was involved, she wouldn’t believe it. I believe she was quoted saying, “not my Ernest, not my Ernest.” I think the realization would have been too much to take, including her realizing the Shoun brothers were poisoning her and likely poisoned her mother as well who died a few years prior under their care.
Thank you for watching this trailer. I'm Osage. The history of the book and movie "is"(not was) much deeper. It still goes on to this very day. My late grandpa was born in 1931. I'm so fortunate and blessed that my linage wasn't directly affected. The wolves probably numbered in the thousands. There is great tragedy in this, but there is also great hope. My family is but 1 story. There are countless others who have triumphed. I'm so glad this movie is coming out. I hope other directors start doing this with other native American tribes.
I get the feeling that the three films that are most likely going to win the Oscar's for best pic will be Oppenheimer, Killers of the Flower Moon, or Past Lives. These three films, imo, are the strongest contenders for best pic.
I worked on this film as a scenic . I am very honored to have had a part.
scorsese only having 1 Oscar feels wrong. He is overdue for a second Oscar
Apparently DiCaprio wad originally cast as the fbi agent investigating the murders, and when the filming was shut down for Covid, DiCaprio spearheaded a rewriting of the script to focus more on his current character
Thank you, thank you. I’ve been bugging you for over a year to review this once it was completed. You didn’t let me down.
The book is one of the most terrifying studies I have ever read. Can't wait to see this movie !
I get your feelings about the ending, but that’s what really happened. He stayed really close to the historical record.
I think he's referring to a certain creative choice Scorcese took with the presentation of the information at the end, not to the actual content of the narrative
@@knurdyob I don’t know if you’ve read the book or not, and I don’t mean to accuse you of ignorance or start an argument, but from what I’ve heard it doesn’t drift too far from Earnest’s own testimony. Maybe that’s BS, I wasn’t there. But this film was way more accurate than goodfellas, historically speaking.
@@anabathrum I've read the book, so I'll be interested to see if there is any departure from it.
@@anabathrum again I don't think the guy on the video was refering to the content itself, but to how Scorcese chose to present the ending. I've heard that the film ends with an epilogue which detaches us from the actual conflict and summarizes the consequences of this story across the decades that followed, sort of like in a documentary, with a narrator telling us what happened, or something along those lines. Regardless of what actually happens in the film, I've heard the ending will be creatively somewhat unconventional in how it presents the information. The accuracy of the events depicted in the film is irrelevant to this topic, what is being discussed regarding the ending is the presentation choices, not the plot
I’m not used to this man smiling in the thumbnail 😂
I predict on this date May 21, 2023 that this film will win Oscars for best director, lead actor, supporting actor, and picture in March 2024.
People always seem to appreciate Scorsese films more a few years later. Casino was mixed reviews at the time. We expect them to be as good as something else rather than what they are. I’m going to keep an open mind.
Bullshit. I saw Casino the day it opened, loved it. I've never seen a Scorsese movie that I DIDN'T like.....and then liked later. That's never happened. Other directors yes, but never Marty.. There are lots of his movies I don't think much of (especially post Casino), and lots of his movies are among my top faves, but none of those movies have changed for me upon repeated viewings. In fact I just watched half of Bringing Out The Dead recently and it's just a lousy as it was in the 90s! lol. Casino STILL has mixed reviews. PS: The mixed reviews were mostly about rehashing Goodfellas, which is fair. Didn't bother me, but I can see where that would be someone's gripe. That and the normal "it's too violent, it's too long" that he always gets.
@@TTM9691A load of twonk! Look at the reputation of the King of Comedy compared to it's original reception! Oh sorry, I guess you weren't born then!
@@TTM9691 The critic Jonathan Rosenbaum also complained about Scorsese using the music from Contempt in Casino, calling it very tacky, and I agree. He uses the music over the final monologue to sell the content of the monologue, that something was lost by the regulation of sin city by the banks. Yeah, maybe if you were there, but it means absolutely nothing to the rest of us. The montage at the end of Babylon is the same kind of a fail (but actually it doesn't come across as a fail in Casino, because of the feeling contained in the music, but it's tacky to appropriate the power of that music, just as Kim Novak was right to complain about the use of Vertigo's Love Theme in the ten years later forgotten movie, The Artist).
@@TTM9691 I love "Bringing Out the Dead", personally. I think it's one of his most unfortunately overlooked films.
Thematically it fits right in with much of the rest of his filmography, particularly "The Last Temptation of Christ" and "Shutter Island", a good man haunted by burdens (and visions) he doesn't believe he can carry anymore, and the tragic self-destruction that ensues.
Great soundtrack too.
@@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 It's a piece of crap, it doesn't matter "thematically", it's a piece of crap. It DOESN'T fit in with the rest of his work in that it is COMPLETELY and idiotically unrealistic. Cage is horrible in it, totally miscast (and I love Cage, and Leo too. Leo is often miscast in his movies as well. Howard Hughes? LOL), Sorry, doofus, but putting a bunch of Hollywood actors in a NYC movie just doesn't cut it. You must live in flyover country where they buy this crap. All I can say is: a person who tells me "Bringing Out The Dead" is anything other than a piece of crap should never be listened to, ever, at least about what makes a good film. Get some taste.
I loved the film. In Scorsese's defence, there is very little documentary information out there on Molly and her thoughts/feelings. I think Scorsese felt it would be disrespectful to speculate or ventriloquize on behalf of the Osage characters
Thank you! I'm not seeing what others are saying about it being a masterpiece. I much preferred the subtle performances of Lily Gladstone and Jesse Plemons to the Capital-A *Acting* of DiCaprio and De Niro.
haha you said Leo is the niece of De Niro I think you meant to say nephew
I've been saying for months that De Niro was a lock in Supporting and I think he has a very big chance of winning.
Leonardo is also the executive producer of this film. So, he was really involved helping Scorsese in the whole process.
I really didn’t like The Irishman but this seems more interesting and has Leo. Hoping Apple does some sort of theatrical release because I’d love to see it on the big screen!
Paramount is releasing it Oct 6 in limited theatrical release and then wide release Oct 20. Will stream on Apple TV+ after that.
Oscars are still only awarded to films that get a theatrical release, so there was never any doubt that it would. I saw The Irishman and Roma on the big screen and I think that made a big difference. There were completely engrossing.
Yea the Irishman wasn’t good for me. And I love long movies but it just wasn’t entertaining. Hoping this is better.
I appreciate your review. I had wanted a more Osage perspective. Especially as Scorsese did it well according to your review. Having something new and different in Scorsese’s work should be focused on. I will still go see it, but I will be prepared for not as much Osage perspective as I had hoped.
Because Scorsese is tuning down everything to make Leo stand out. That makes the movie uneven. But we are just happy to see a Scorsese film again.
Curious to know if this could win Adapted Screenplay or not unless if the category isn’t super competitive this year. I could see it as the front runner but also looking back to Scorsese films post The Departed like Hugo, The Wolf of Wall Street and The Irishman. Those films didn’t win Screenplay so I’m 50/50 predicting this for a win or not. If I can see anything else winning Adapted Screenplay it would be Oppenheimer. The recent trailer has a lot of conversation scenes focusing on the urgency of the Trinity Test and maybe Nolan has a chance to win an Oscar in that category.
The departed won best adapted screenplay for William Monahan
@@chancellor1055 I was talking about Scorsese films after Departed that didn’t win Screenplay.
Niece? Not nephew?
does anyone know the music that they use
in the trailer
No mention of DiCaprio’s chances?
6:55
If they didn't nominate Silence, the Academy can ignore this one as well.
They largely ignored Silence because the studio fucked up the campaign. Apple TV+, on the other hand, will absolutely put all of their chips into this basket and make sure this gets the campaign it deserves.
I'm still pissed about the reception "Silence" received. An incredibly beautiful, compelling film.
My personal theory is that, after Trump's election in 2016, the kinds of people who see Scorsese's films maybe (?) weren't feeling a narrative revolving around faith. Faith is too often associated with conservatism, for better or worse.
Andrew Garfield's performance is mind-bogglingly powerful and when he WAS nominated that year but for "Hacksaw Ridge", it was so disappointing. Garfield went to places film actors don't usually go to in "Silence". It really breaks my heart how overlooked it was. I'm heartened to consistently see people online sticking up for it though.
@@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 I thought Garfield's performance was the weak link. Just my opinion. I feel a Ben Wishaw or Cillian Murphy in that role would have elevated the film.
@@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 damn you are right on the money about 2016 and religion
How did you get to see the film before it came out?
Where/how did you see it? Cannes?
How’d you watch it, it’s not even out yet
so exciting you got to experience this premiere!
Assuming Scorsese is nominated for best director, he has now made 9 narrative feature films since 2002 and 7 have been nominated in the category. Same for best picture. Wow.
If and when Scorsese gets nominated for Best Director for Killer of the Flower Moon, he will officially be the 2nd highest nominated Director in Hollywood History with 10 nominations followed closely at number 3 by Spielberg with 9 nominations.
Is it October already?
No
completely agree with you. There is so much hype for the movie and some will call anything Scorsese does a 5 star masterwork. He's one of my favorite directors but those stan reactions can seem disingenuous and getting caught in the hype.
I'm far from a Scorsese stan, but this movie really got me. It is my favorite among his works, without a doubt.
Were you in Cannes? Have you seen the movie?
Is Gladstone definitely Supporting or do you think she'll compete in Lead?
All due respect, I know people seem to like him and I'm not knocking anyone personally, but I don't get Jessie Plemons. I just don't get him. I understand he's part of this EG Marshall, Jerry Orbach, Chishu Ryu-school of "subtle stone face acting", and I understand the place for that. I suppose I just don't understand the acclaim.
I just personally haven't seen the range enough in Plemons' work to justify the admiration I see. He plays....him. Which is fine, you can count on that and that's fine. But the actors of his generation who I feel are legitimately great actors, Michael Fassbender, Tom Hardy, James McAvoy, those guys DO have range. I just don't see Plemons anywhere _close_ to those guys.
I don't know. Maybe I haven't seen enough of his work. He was funny in "The Irishman", I'll give him that.
I’ve been waiting for this. Still so excited for this movie. I’m glad you liked May December. Can’t wait for that review
what do you mean by wolves?
I'm calling it. Jessie Plemons wins the Supporting Actor Academy Award.
Supporting actor with Troy and ke they have gone with the heart and soul of the film. So I feel like they could go for the husband in past lives. Or gosling in Barbie. I currently have
Deniro
Magaro
Gosling
As my top 3 supporting actors
Please not gosling for the barbie shit.
@@ChrolliForever I don’t see him getting nominated either.
I would add Robert Downey Jr
A real film.
The 'weirdly Lynchian' room where DeNiro gives DiCaprio a beating was full of freemason imagery and symbolism. The two pillars at the center, checkered floor, and a bunch of 'G's and square+compass engravings. Hale also says in that scene that he is a 32nd degree freemason and it really stood out to me how Scorsese included the fact that Hale was a freemason of the highest degree and why he decided to do so. The movie is not only filled with traditional Osage and then also Catholic imagery and depiction of rituals, but has this one short quick scene entirely set in a masonic room where the main villain reveals he is a 32nd degree mason, and then it is never brought up again (as far as I noticed).
With the love for zone of interest it could pull a parasite or also quietly sweep the season
From the book, Molly didnt think that her husband had anything to do with it. Not even after she escaped death. So no, she had no idea of the wolves. The Osage didnt even know why they were targeted. A number of the murders went un noticed even by the FBI until after the trial. Others were killed in a non direct murderous fashion. Also one of the wolves was the person conducting the autopsy. Read the book before you complain about the movie. Molly had no forsight until it was explained to her what was happening. She took noticed more about the white supremacy she encountered & the sly racism hurled her way. She was rich with black and white severants. White folks didnt take kindly to her hiring white severants. As the Murders hit closer to home. She withdrew from society. Out of fear and reasonable paranoia. But she never came close to realizing her husband and sister's husband were the killers.
Thing is it wasnt Marty's place to tell it from the Osage, he KNEW he couldnt do it justice just from their perspective
just saw it and i completely agree on wanting more of mollie. leo is good, but i think it could be more subtle.
Idk if its because i watched it on my laptop and some headphones and not in the theater, but a lot of the sound felt off, like some dialogue was blatantly added or altered. Also i wasnt crazy about the fraser performance
Also after reading that the violence was dialed down (mollie was being poisoned w arsenic etc.) just so that ernest can have this weird grey area about love when it was just insane abuse puts a sour taste in my mouth.
Also i wish they cut to mollie reacting to ernest’s testimony
Hey was wondering if you could please start scheduling these if possible to tell us when u r next uploading , hope it’s not too much o an ask keep at it 👍
Definitely excited for this .
I'm finally EXCITED for a new Scorsese
5:06 - that editing must reflect a definite directorial choice, what would have been 'powerful' to you is not the kind of powerful the director wanted, and maybe you were supposed to feel that way, more distant from that character. I don't think your brain 'itching' for it necessarily means it's the best artistic choice
“Best” artistic choice is impossible to determine, art is very subjective. He can only speak to his own experience watching the film.
@@sebastiano728 choices like that are for precise effect. Like when I watch a claustrophobic movie like Rear Window, obviously my brain 'itches' for the camera to leave the apartment, but the whole power of the movie comes from the fact that it never does
@@helvete_ingres4717 Have you seen the film? Even if you had, I can't see how you can claim to know what effect Scorsese aimed to go for. No film or director is above critique, and surely Scorsese didn't want the audience to feel like the indigenous community was underrepresented, as was The Oscar Expert's experience during that part of his review.
The Trailer alone deserves an Oscar.
Three and a half hours…. Some folks got some BIG strong bladders 😬😖🥴😧
I honestly would be fine with this film being 4 hours lol, the book has so much context I can’t imagine the pain of whoever had to edit this film.
Thelma Schoonmaker. Legendary editor and frequent collaborator of Scorsese. Won 3 Oscars out of 8 nominations.
NEED The Zone of Interest review
Nooooo!!! I've waited for The Zone of Interest review... Nobody has commented it further still
Just watched it the other day and it was brilliant! I didn’t know three and a half hour have passed!
The real question is how many wolves were in this movie, bro!? 🐺🐺🐺
Just drop the may december review.
That's not what I heard...I heard that the Osage people have no say in this movie at all.
i know where you're coming from in regards on giving more to the Osage people...BUT, it's a business after all...and Gladstone doesn't sell movies, DiCaprio does.
This film was fantastic. The only only movie I’ve seen at any festival or theater this year that stands a chance against it is Zone of Interest.
A great book - can’t wait to see the film.
Big smile in the thumbnail for such a dark film lol
How on earth is this most anticipated movie in recent history ???
greatest living director, incredible cast, 200m budget, riveting true crime historical story, incredible cinematography and score composed by Robbie Roberton of The Band
Daniel Brooke’s is probably gonna be showerer. But I feel like gladstone could do it and win the Oscar. But I could see Brooke’s and gladstone sweep the season.
Better q - what crimes did your ancestors commit?!
Im calling it now. This is a BP lock, or at the very least Martin will win Director again finally
Leonardo DiCaprio is one of the best actors, if not the best, of all time. Look at his filmography and his performances, it's obvious. :)
Except for Titanic, bad acting all round, rubbish movie
I wish Scorsese put you in a test audience before making final cuts - or before he finished it!
3 and a half hours is bordering on too long, and kinda why Kill Bill was chopped in half. DiCaprio is amazing so it might be worth the watch.
So excited for this one! I’ll be honest though that I’ll probably stream this one instead of watching it in the theater. 😅
jesse plemmons could get a similar treatment that jamie lee curtis got for eeaao
For me, nothing can surpass Past Lives this year
Yeah give oscar to another boring social film. No thanks
@@m.n.s.s2825 what do u mean with "social"?
@@igorsilva3657 he means it's not a white western film full of action.
@@igorsilva3657
Social film drama is a film genre that moves and inspires people to change policy, practice and individual behaviour. A dramatic, sensitive and authentic treatment of social issues, which powerfully connects audiences to the emotions and people that lie behind our assumptions, stereotypes and prejudices
From Google
A Highly Snooze fest genre mostly made with zero entertainment value or rather than sending messages. Oscar adores this genre 🤣
@@ikateeo
I am brown Indian. Stop assuming and Calling out people for r******sm without any good reason. Your kind is one of the reasons why the word loses its real value
I was so ready for Plemons to lead this movie.
Tom White is essentially the lead character in the book!
😔
Yeah. I really loved him as Todd in breaking bad, and wanted to see him shine. And yes, Tom White was so important in the book. I shed a tear when I read that he part of his left forearm blown off and got left to die, and almost stopped reading once I read that J. Edgar Hoover couldn’t give much of a shit for an Angel like Tom. Compared to Ernest he’s a million times more important. I would have preferred if the film was from the perspective of the FBI primarily, not the osage or the Hale’s team.
It's not a white savior movie, and it makes more sense to focus on the villains and the Osage instead of the FBI.
@@juanjoyaborja.3054 nah but ernest and mollie's relationship was the more interesting angle to take to ensure this was refreshing and actually did something boundary-pushing. tom white as lead would have just been another crime procedural with stoic lawman. it was more important that the Osage gave input and were allowed to have a guiding hand on this project so it actually does their past justice in film. the book is entirely different and I'm not critiquing that, two entirely different mediums
@@burritogamer3984 I understand. But Tom White was just so much more than a “stoic lawman”, his backstory as a Texas Ranger, his relationship with J. Edgar Hoover, the work he did to finally bring down Hale, and his life after that were all so captivating. I would kill to see it portrayed on the big screen. But I can see why an angle more focused on the Osage would be better, like you said.
I like your opinions being balanced and requiring critical thinking, lots of people assume that everything Scorsese does is perfect because 'CiNeMa'.
Everything that Scorsese does is perfect! 👍🏻
Definitely wins oscar for best costume design
Earnest is the "niece" of Robert De Niro?
"It is enjoyable throughout."... Greed, evil, brutal murders, deceit... What's enjoyable about that?
Wokey Clown spotted 😅
Leo is De Niro's niece in this film?! Lol
I can't wait about this new Scorsese film
Saying that people want to call everything Scorcese does a masterpiece is disregarding their opinions as valid and thinking too highly of yourself’s don’t you think? It doesn’t matter if you don’t agree.
"Leonardo DiCaprio is the niece of Robert de Niro" Interesting 🤔
We have our ver sad tragic story an warriors victory song! That really happened five years later of the great depression of 1931! On the crow creek sioux Indian reservation of SD half a northwest of the town stephan. In a long narrow valley just below the hilly prairie land country along the beautiful Missouri River. A large encampment over sixty to eighty hunkpati Dakota sioux people still definitely living on Cheney rush encampment. It actually trigger started the Buffalo County war or the Great war for the northern part of the reservation! In the spring of 1931 the continued harassment by the local towns people and the ranchers in the northern part of the reservation! During the time of the sooner policy act the reservation land take over of the better half of the 20th century! On the morning of a hot summer day of August 1931 the Dakota sioux Indian men left for a hunting trip on the other side of the reservation. Leaving their entire families and young pregnant young ladies at the Cheney rush encampment site. Later on the same day a large party of over hundred American civilians intruders arrived there with guns and rifles very unannounced! They seriously wanted to take away the Dakota sioux Indian people's traditional Buffalo hunting grounds and our rich fertile farm lands along the beautiful Missouri River! The guilty murderous intruders would brutal kill the entire Dakota sioux Indian people poor innocent lives there! The elders were young children at the time saw an witness the tragedy unfolded there will hiding a safe distance away. Many years later they told the story well crying and wipt of the very sad brutal Cheney rush massacre, the second sand creek massacre of 1864! The only tragic massacre in the us history someone tried to cover up the evidence that it never happened there! There's no memorial site because of the forgotten fallen Dakota sioux Indian people who wrongfully slaughtered there! The American intruders built a huge fire an burned the poor Dakota sioux Indian bodies to burned ashes remains! Then they moved the burned ashes remains north to the two small rolling hills of the 1930s site! The one hill on the left side. The children want an told everyone on the reservation what happened to their own Dakota sioux Indian encampment who were innocent murdered there! The Dakota sioux Indian men also heard the very sad tragic story after returning from a hunting trip! The Dakota sioux Indian men's hearts were broken from their loved ones who were wrongfully brutality murdered at the Cheney rush massacre site! The very next day over three hundred angered Dakota sioux Indian warriors were coming ready to fight against the American guilty murderous intruders! On the prairie land country along near the massacre site the American civilians would face the great very impressive enemy warriors numbers coming from a great distance away! The American civilians intruders were surprised to see so many more warriors were arriving there! Iron Nation's kul wicasa oyate Lakota sioux Indian warriors probably may have assisted in the fierce fighting to! In the running battle into a full retreat probably more Americans civilians were killed in the fierce fighting battlefield! Dust would rise up from the horses hooves made a great impressive very intense bloody conflict battlefield scene! In the sioux warriors favor the rest of the defeated wounded weakened American murderous intruders escaped or fled back across the reservation border lands! To their own ranches and towns never wanting to take back the hunkpati Dakota sioux people's traditional reservation Buffalo hunting grounds and our rich fertile farm lands along the beautiful Missouri River. The last forgotten tragedy of the 20th century and the last brave Dakota and Lakota sioux warriors true victory song of the hot summers days on August of 1931! The last great sioux victory after the little bighorn victory June 25,1876 the retribution for the poor lost innocent murdered lives at the brutal Cheney rush massacre site! Just because the wounded knee massacre of 1890 had ended doesn't mean the brutal killings wouldn't stop there! It just moved to another place! The Osage Indian murders an the Cheney rush bloody conflict are two different stories of the early twenty century! The Cheney rush massacre victory site is still there today half a mile northwest from the town stephan SD along the highway to the capital of Pierre SD! The only Dakota sioux Indian bloody conflict east of the beautiful Missouri River of South Dakota! Many decades after the Indian Wars had ended! My historical information for today. Have a great fabulous wonderful day.
Based on you guys' reviews, I think it's a good movie but still not the kind of movie that's really impressive and game changing like Parasite or EEAAO. I think BD+Lily+A few techs will be possible for its Oscar chance.
Well rounded review.
Things to remember when going to see this movie all the way in October.
1. It's a movie.
2. History is history.
It's good to acknowledge history but *don't* make it a just cause to go and "re slice" the scar of systematic racism outrage. Just leave the healed scar where its at. It's not like re scarring yourself for something that happened all the way back in 1918. Just watch it and learn from it *without* the drama.
❤ movie is gonna be epic . I read the book it was awesome.
Please tell me you watched may December. Need that review next :)
It's coming
Who the hell is Lily Gladstone? People are here to see DiCaprio
Glad to hear Fraser’s performance was good. Another critic tore him apart saying he was an “embarrassment” compared to Lithgow.
Funny how a 5 minute performance is gonna be as divisive as his Oscar winning role.
Why do you think people hate (or will hate) his performance?
unpopular opinion: since his internet-engineered comeback, people have been pretending he was a good actor when he never really was
@@helvete_ingres4717 This. He poured his heart out in The Whale, but prior to that he wasn't that great. b
@@joser1853 I dind't see the whale but it looked goofy and I have not heard good things about it
How "good" could a 5 minute performance be? He only got the role (2 years ago) because his retiring agent called in a favor from the casting director. His new agent isn't getting any offers. Buying the Oscar vote only got him a playmate for his Rick O'Connell doll.
@@helvete_ingres4717 It's got a fantastic cinemascore, so people love it. It's a great film in my opinion.
That's exactly what I was thinking. That this story should've been told from the indigenous people's perspective.