here r the answers lads 1. Causes carbon emissions, and damages animal habitats 2. D.R Congo, Indonesia, Liberia, Ghana. 3. If there was no demand for wood, there wouldn't be illegal logging.
1. protect the vulnerable habitat and people that live near the forests 2. False 3. 236 million 4. development and management of a long-term sustainable economic plan
Hi European Forest institute can i use some scene of this video because i need it to my short film video in my ESP subject at my school thank you!.. i hope you agree...
EIA and Telapak investigated the research of illegal logging, so our HUTAN Group took the actions for illegal timber trade in Japan and overseas countries. But Japanese Forestry Ministry don't grade up as same as EU Timber Law or Lacey Law, We, FoEJapan,JATAN requested strongly to make the Japanese Lacey Law on Nov. 2014. The 20 % local government in Japan want to make this Law! Nishioka/HUTAN Group
even though legal logging is better regulated, it is still the most impactfull in degradating ecosystems. so while i understand that people want to stop illegal logging, and its causes (both in survival of loggers and their loved ones, and in the demand for wood irrespective of the effects of logging), it should not be a justification, that 'as long as it happens legal it is good'. justice goes beyond legality, whether it is race justice, or justice towards animals and ecosystems. we should never go beyond necessity, when it is causing suffering, or ecosystem degradation. besides this, reforesting is not the solution either, the amazon forest is an intricate system of biological interactions, a web of lifeforms engaging in many ways, planting trees is just a small fragment of this. and its benefits depend wholly on the many lifeforms to spread and be able to live within that forest, which creates its own difficulties. it is similar to having been ill and taking antibiotics to counter intestine infection, after this healthy bacteria can recolonise your guts and replace the dead ones , but it is also a free game for unhealthy ones. people can still get sick after taking antibiotics, as side effect. So while trees are better than no trees, especially when those trees are specifically grown to replace legal and illegal deforestation. but it cannot replace an ecosystem. and in developing ecosystems, one must be wise, and work together with the present species, to not depend to much on their resilience, and their ability to bounce back. As the amazon shows: once a certain treshhold is reached, it could be the end of that forest, it cannot sustain itself, create its own precipitation by spreading nucleotides and water vapor. That lush forest we see now, within this century might turn into a desert, and it wont matter, whether illegal or legal loggin would cause it. nature doesn't care.
In the state of Victoria, Australia we currently log a tiny potion of the native forest it is all replanted a sustainable and renewable resource. The government and conservationists here are thinking they are doing the best thing for the environment are stopping native timber logging in 2030. We don't have enough plantation timber to fill our replacement needs with the loss of native logging meaning loss of more jobs and the collapse of small rural communities. Where is that timber coming from? We currently import nearly 6 billion dollars of raw timber each year and Interpol says we import approx 800 million of illegally harvested timber into Australia this total doesn't include all the imported processed timber with unknown origin. Australia's demand for timber is going to jump after 2030. The conservation movement in Australia doesn't realise the damage they are doing to the world through deforestation in other countries and pollution costs of long distance transportation for their desire to stop native timber logging in the state of Victoria, Australia.
here r the answers lads 1. Causes carbon emissions, and damages animal habitats 2. D.R Congo, Indonesia, Liberia, Ghana. 3. If there was no demand for wood, there wouldn't be illegal logging.
here r the answers lads
1. Causes carbon emissions, and damages animal habitats
2. D.R Congo, Indonesia, Liberia, Ghana.
3. If there was no demand for wood, there wouldn't be illegal logging.
Haababahahah thank you
Lol legend
sound
Sound mate
Sound
who else has to watch this for school
me
Me also
me
Me
Me
I am currently doing my homework while watching this for geography rn.
From carlow Ireland btw 🇮🇪🇮🇪
I’m from Ireland too, but in Kerry. Ireland 🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪
@@acronin5857 woah my last name is Cronin too this is incredible
@@realrandiee r ye usin cyclone as a geography book 😭😭
Ireland too but Cork
@@egirlrich4031 you here from p.347?
1. protect the vulnerable habitat and people that live near the forests
2. False
3. 236 million
4. development and management of a long-term sustainable economic plan
you are amazing
You’re so real for this 💯
Yes thanks 😂
Karen Burke
What a king teacher
I am watching for school D:
me too :D
ME TOOO
same
Same kiid
Same
Well lads
Hello
Hello sam
Many sent here by karen burke
Geography class😩😩👋
Same 😬🖐️
same 😭😭
im only watching 4 school
Hi European Forest institute can i use some scene of this video because i need it to my short film video in my ESP subject at my school thank you!.. i hope you agree...
We all want legal and proper forest management.
I don't. You all deserve to burn on this miserable planet.
nah
EIA and Telapak investigated the research of illegal logging, so our HUTAN Group took the actions for illegal timber trade in Japan and overseas countries. But Japanese Forestry Ministry don't grade up as same as EU Timber Law or Lacey Law, We, FoEJapan,JATAN requested strongly to make the Japanese Lacey Law on Nov. 2014.
The 20 % local government in Japan want to make this Law!
Nishioka/HUTAN Group
i am entering for journalism to featute writing i hope this will help me
even though legal logging is better regulated, it is still the most impactfull in degradating ecosystems.
so while i understand that people want to stop illegal logging, and its causes (both in survival of loggers and their loved ones, and in the demand for wood irrespective of the effects of logging),
it should not be a justification, that 'as long as it happens legal it is good'.
justice goes beyond legality, whether it is race justice, or justice towards animals and ecosystems.
we should never go beyond necessity, when it is causing suffering, or ecosystem degradation.
besides this, reforesting is not the solution either,
the amazon forest is an intricate system of biological interactions, a web of lifeforms engaging in many ways,
planting trees is just a small fragment of this.
and its benefits depend wholly on the many lifeforms to spread and be able to live within that forest, which creates its own difficulties.
it is similar to having been ill and taking antibiotics to counter intestine infection, after this healthy bacteria can recolonise your guts and replace the dead ones ,
but it is also a free game for unhealthy ones. people can still get sick after taking antibiotics, as side effect.
So while trees are better than no trees, especially when those trees are specifically grown to replace legal and illegal deforestation.
but it cannot replace an ecosystem. and in developing ecosystems, one must be wise, and work together with the present species, to not depend to much on their resilience, and their ability to bounce back. As the amazon shows: once a certain treshhold is reached, it could be the end of that forest, it cannot sustain itself, create its own precipitation by spreading nucleotides and water vapor. That lush forest we see now, within this century might turn into a desert, and it wont matter, whether illegal or legal loggin would cause it. nature doesn't care.
In the state of Victoria, Australia we currently log a tiny potion of the native forest it is all replanted a sustainable and renewable resource. The government and conservationists here are thinking they are doing the best thing for the environment are stopping native timber logging in 2030. We don't have enough plantation timber to fill our replacement needs with the loss of native logging meaning loss of more jobs and the collapse of small rural communities. Where is that timber coming from? We currently import nearly 6 billion dollars of raw timber each year and Interpol says we import approx 800 million of illegally harvested timber into Australia this total doesn't include all the imported processed timber with unknown origin. Australia's demand for timber is going to jump after 2030. The conservation movement in Australia doesn't realise the damage they are doing to the world through deforestation in other countries and pollution costs of long distance transportation for their desire to stop native timber logging in the state of Victoria, Australia.
Kinsay naka upaw elligal o mag uuma???
sukses lur
watching this for environmental science rn
Anyone elses wood work teachers send em here
What kind of person wants to buy wood nowadays Europe is already built
God you are dumb.
Lol
memang kebanyakan manusia tidak peduli akan kehidupan masa yg akan datang/masa depan dan cendrung rakus=perusak
Came here for an essay :v
same
Hi guys
Ello
@@rachelmccartan3147 hi Rachel
Should stop to destroy the forests!
Nishioka/HUTAN Group
BRIDGETOWN
Uwukai who thos
Wexford
@UCkP7AzN0YzIGh05seuivsTw forest destroyer shall be in jail
grabi manyan alam bayan ng govorment
a lads lets try get the unlikes higher then the likes
hala
here r the answers lads
1. Causes carbon emissions, and damages animal habitats
2. D.R Congo, Indonesia, Liberia, Ghana.
3. If there was no demand for wood, there wouldn't be illegal logging.
My man
actully fucking ledgend
legend