Just look at the situation of Muslims today without a khalifah. The fact that billions of Muslims couldn't help their brothers is more than enough evidence that a khalifah is a must to be established.
Give the capabilities to your own generation rather than saying this name it will take may be three generations to establish if you try to do your work
@@mumin.azraaqyou sound like a Khalifa is like a prophet. We won’t know when some special man will be gifted to us by Allah to become a Khalifa, we have to practice our deen to 1. Recognize la ilaha ill Allah 2. Recognize that each human here on earth has been personally invited to be here by Allah 3. Allah does not force an individual to uphold the rights and privileges set by Islam, so no human should force another human to bend to their will, lest you assume the position of Allah and commit shirk 4. Allah has made man with variation and to respect that variation that He created. Do not expect uniformity among the ummah. Some will be weak and others will be strong and all in between. Some will practice one way and some will practice another. Thru our differences we must reach mutual respect. It is the only way we will learn and grow. Bc Allah created mankind where if everyone agrees, then everyone stops thinking. Allah loves odd numbers, He loves the juxtaposition bc it keeps mankind thinking, learning and growing. So achieve mutual respect, not uniformity. Once we all recognize this as an ummah, iA then we will have a khilafah.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct : Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step! Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part! Examples of Priorities, Quran 31 :13 says Tawhid is before obeying parents. In hadith a Man was told go back to your parents and make them laugh like you made them sad before joining me. Again step by step. Quran 9 .122 says don't send all out to fight, some need to stay to learn & teach din!
Gulf nations (rulers) like UAE and Saudi aren't loyal to sheikh MUHAMMAD ibn Abdul Wahhab anymore unfortunately. They are going another direction, the direction of kufr (liberalism) anti islam etc b@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
And [remember, O Muhammad], when those who disbelieved plotted against you to restrain you or kill you or evict you [from Makkah]. But they plan, and Allah plans. And Allah is the best of planners.
Khilafat has already been established by Allah, after the massih and mahdi that has already come...those currently living under the khilafat are benefitting...those who are not do not realise their loss
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
I will briefly respond pointwise on the issues mentioned in the talk by brother Yasir Qadhi: 1. If establishment of Khilafah is fardh kifayah then it should be understood that due to non-establishment of Khilafah, this obligation remains unfulfilled, and consequently the whole Ummah is sinful for neglecting this obligation. This is because unless fardh kifayah is fulfilled, the whole Ummah remains responsible for it, and the sin may only be removed from those who are striving to fulfill the fardh, while those who are negligent will carry the sin of neglecting the fardh. You may not need Khilafah to enter Jannah, but you surely need to strive for its establishment to have an excuse on the Day of Judgement regarding what you were doing while 100 years had passed but this fardh was not fulfilled. 2. It is allowed to live outside Khilafah on temporary basis under the condition that you have permission of the Khalifah. The Muslims of Abyssinia remained there because the Prophet ﷺ allowed them to stay there. However, if a Muslim chooses to live outside the Khilafah permanently or without the permission of the Khalifah then he will be living the life of Jahiliyyah as mentioned in many ahadith of the Prophet ﷺ. 3. The claim is not that if we had Khilafah, Gaza would not have happened. The point is that 57 nation states are not going to do anything about Gaza because Gaza is neither their land nor their nation. It is only Khilafah, based on Islamic ideology, which will consider all Muslims and all Islamic land as its responsibility, whether it is Al-Quds, Kashmir, Burma, USA or Europe. Khilafah is the state which will deal with all the issues based on Islam. The existing nations states have failed in this because none of these are based on Islam, rather all of these are based on nationalism. These states cannot unite the Ummah, rather these are the cause of division of ummah. Whether Khilafah succeeds in liberating Al-Quds depends on other conditions. However, the primary condition is establishment of a political power based on Islam which unifies the Ummah i.e. the Khilafah. Without fulfilling this primary condition, liberation of Al-Quds will remain a dream. 4. Andalusia was lost because it separated from Khilafah, it was never under the rule of Abbasid or Ottoman Caliphate, rather it had it own independent rule. So to say that we lost Andalusia in spite of existence of Ottoman Caliphate is a comment based on ignorance. And the Ottoman Caliphate did send battleships to help the Muslims of Spain, however, by that time Muslim rule had been weakened beyond recovery. 5. Al-Quds was lost to the crusaders because Muslims were divided into two Caliphates i.e. Fatimids and Abbasids. Al-Quds was under the rule of the Fatimids when the Crusaders conquered it, while other Muslims did nothing due to the prevalent political division. The real genius of Salah-ud-din Ayyubi was that he identified the cause of division of Muslims and worked to unite them. The victory which was given by Allah to Sultan Salah-ud-din was after he dissolved the Fatimid Caliphate and united the Ummah under Abbasid Caliphate. Only then he was able to liberate Al-Quds from the Crusaders. So anyone wishing for liberation of Al-Quds has to first unify the Ummah under one banner of Islam, otherwise Allah's help will never come. 6. On the issue of Gaza, it is not enough to say that at least we are trying to do something when we protest or raise funds or write letters to some ruler or senator etc. OK do whatever you can, however, keep in mind that whatever you do should be part of a well thought out plan to eventually liberate Al-Quds. If well educated people just participate in a protest because that is convenient, without having any plan as to how this will eventually lead to liberation of Al-Quds, then all these protests will be futile. Make a plan and put it into action. The initial steps will be small but these steps should be for a bigger aim, not an aim in themselves. The sahabi who donated one date in Tabuk, knew that it was for a bigger aim of waging jihad against the Romans, his donation even though small, was not without any bigger aim. So keep your aim big, plan for it with full diligence, and work on it with full dedication, as you plan and work for the future of your children and grandchildren. 7. The prophet ﷺ told us what a "modern Khilafah" will be like at the end of times. It will be based on the way of the Prophethood (علی منہاج النبوۃ), not on the way of the European Union. So please if you want to strive for Khilafah, then do so for the Khilafah based on Islam, not on some union which kuffar have come up with. Nationalism is an invalid bond as far as Islam is concerned. It was nationalism which destroyed the body of the Ummah, so how can you expect the Ummah to unite while upholding these nationalistic divisions? OIC, Arab League and all other bodies based on nationalism have failed, can't you see that even now? Nationalism is a call of Jahiliyyah which has nothing to do with Islam, so don't call the ummah by the call of Jahiliyyah, call them with the call of Islam. The Ummah will never be united till it replaces the bond of nationalism with the Islamic bond. It is due to absence of Khilafah and division of Muslims into nation states that 2 billions Muslims are watching helplessly while 2 million Muslims in Gaza starve to death right in the heartland of Islam. So brother YQ, your opinion is not correct, and please don't make establishment of Khilafah a trivial matter because it will have severe consequences in this world as well as the hereafter.
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi. To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Daleel to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events. Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...) What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader! I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba??? All in all very disappointed.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Mind Begs the Question: - If Islam prescribes - Caliphate to establish Security - Sharia Law to establish Justice - To Ban either is denying Religious Freedom,no?
There is no khilafa in the world right now. Does this mean there are no muslims, no ummah? Muslims can only unite under a khilafah and otherwise it is impossible?
Khifafah is a ‘tool’ that allows the implementation of islam in its entirety….. the social issues you mentioned - building/maintainance of our masajids - educating people to pray etc … These are actions that will be carried out by the state once it returns InshaAllah. Currently we as an ummah are doing our best but the highest priority of us an an ummah is be work to implement the system of islam holistically! The idea of a khilafah isn’t a utopian idea…. Things may not be perfect once it’s established, we will face obstacles but that’s doesn’t mean the obligation ceases to exit Khilafah will be established when the Nusarah is given by the people of power. Eg as we read in the seerah.
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
Of course yes, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
How come he said that Khilafah is not as not important as ibadat and Muamalat whereas tho muslim scholar declares that Khilafah is the taajul furudh, main obligation? By Khilafah, most of shariah Will be implemented in the living. And without the khilafah, most of islamic obligation like law, politics and economic system of Islam is not applied.
My understanding is he said it's a community obligation. Though for the average Muslim, your personal worship / behavior should be your primary focus. This is what Allah (God) will ask us about, what was in our hands. People could live under Islamic law but choose not to follow Islam at a personal level. It must come from your heart. At the same time if there was truly righteous overall leader/s (not restrained by financial or political gain), that could increase cohesion across the ummah (community) InshaAllah (God-willing).
I must say, reading the comments brought me joy - many, if not all, of the comments I’ve read have emphatically denied the subordination the caliphate to something else insofar as our Fardh Al Kifaya. Alhamdulilah this Ummah is understanding its authentic solution to modern problems - as well as understanding this, I’ve seen great nuance regarding the fact the a caliphate does not necessitate perfection or a utopic state of politics, but as a tool wherein wider liberation discussions can be had.
I’m afraid you misunderstood what he was saying. Nowhere did he say that a khilafah is not required. He was saying that the ppl are not ready for the khulafah, that we have work to do to build up to it. Which is true. We can’t even manage our own masajid, how will we manage an entire nation? Islam is not abt putting up pretenses, it’s abt building the character of man to reach mutual respect between each other despite our differences in order to grow. Allah made humans different and problems will always exist, but despite that let’s continue to grow ourselves and then reach mutual respect. Thru that we will establish a khilafah iA. Establishing a khilafah doesn’t mean that we will reach utopia. The problems will remain but we will be ready to form a society under Islam iA. Leave the perfection for the hereafter.
@@wc7zr 100% agree. Instantaneously implementing laws that people aren't ready for will bring dispute, but everything should be done step by step.if we look at the siirah of the prophet saw you'll see how everything wasn't made wajib at the begging but little by little For example: Fasting was made obligatory in the second year of hijrah I believe, as for jihad in that same year too. Correct me if I'm wrong
@@PhilosophicalMenacenot only this but there is a misunderstanding that the khilafah should be instated to control the ppl and assert Islam over mankind. This assumption is wrong. The khilafah’s purpose is to defend the rights of mankind and all creation to exist. Allah put us here and the age of prophecy ended with Muhammad (s), so Allah will no longer grant wahi. His communication to us is thru nature, thru unforeseen circumstances and what is sealed in the past is considered Allah’s final decision. Allah then continues to bring new life into existence here, each with its own will, temperament and preferences to grow into as it exists. Allah’s laws are given to allow each of us here to exist as we please. Therefore the khilafah is not there to make sure the ppl follow the laws, but to make sure the the potential to follow those laws are there rather than impede the ability to follow those laws. It is then up to us to exercise our will and make the proper decisions to exercise our ability to exist with the respect that Allah exercises His own will reflected in the dunya we all exist in. The individual has the responsibility to defend our right to exist while respecting our neighbors’ rights to equally exist and respect Allah’s ultimate will to bring everything into existence as He pleases. Those of us that follow his laws decreed in the Quran should be mindful of this understanding. The khilafah must make sure that the potential to follow laws is there, not to force the laws upon mankind. If Allah doesn’t use His will to force mankind despite intimately giving us the ability to exist here, no man can then assert force upon another to control other’s will. That is shirk, and the khilafah cannot be based on shirk.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
There are so many videos from the people of Gaza screaming out for the Khilafah. The Arab preachers in the Muslim world are discussing the return of the Khilafah in context of what’s happening in Gaza. Unfortunately, some Western Muslim academics and scholars have a very romanticised idea of dawah and revival. Their thinking and vision is extremely narrow, and they can’t think beyond the boundaries of their “institutions”. The call and work for the Khilafah is one of sacrifice, confrontation against the status quo, persecution by the Kuffar - none of which you’ll find in Yasir Qadhi’s type of dawah.
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Leadership is essential for collective success, the Ummah must work towards it, Allah doesn’t promise you’ll win every battle, but without it you have no foundation
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 No one is denying or undermining the fact that tawheed and the fundamentals of the religion are of course important, but this is an ongoing struggle with people, not everyone is at the same level or going to be on all correct beliefs on every matter, this wasn’t the case over the centuries and now, however the efforts and struggles in other areas of Islam didn’t come to a standstill. The Ummah needs to work in all areas of the religion, leadership is an essential step towards unifying and strengthening the Ummah, and I’m not talking about the state leaders who are mostly subservient to their colonial masters. How can anyone undermine the importance of proper leadership and unity between the already fragmented and weak muslim community
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
@@omowhanre if anyone is reading history books with orientalist glasses, they would be biased with that kind of Islamophobic narratives. Some caliphs were bad, it doesn’t mean Islamic system is bad.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Brother Sheikh Yasir Qadhi , remember in the 18th 19th century, the offensive plays on Islam and prophet in Europe and how the Ottoman Khalifa handled it, in one incident he threatened the British authorities calling for jihad from Muslims, and the show was canceled. So in my opinion we need a leader, Khalifa to keep in check in global level and to guide the imams around the world
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
The social, economic and political (khilafah) system makes up a far bigger and more important part of the Deen in comparison to the personal religious rituals that are mandatory for Muslims to perform on a daily basis. The sad thing is that people limit Islam to just being a religion with a few rituals and spiritual actions and they forget that Islam is a DEEN. And the Deen of Islam encompasses the social, economic and political system Allah and His Prophet PBUH gave us.
Rasool Allah SAW said the only way to protect the blood of the Muslims is to have a khaleefah. إنما الإمام جنة. يقاتل من ورائه. ويتقى به. (مسلم) Verily, the Imam (the khaleefah) of the Muslims is a shield. The Muslims fight behind him and are protected by him. (Muslim) Yasir Qadhi says , " No, no.. forget about all that.. the Europeans have given us a better formula than Rasool Allah SAW. Forget about Khilafah on the method of prophethood. Let's establish a union on the method of the Europeans." Rasool Allah SAW's command is... على منهاج النبوة Yasir Qadhi's formula: على منهاج الأوروبيين "Scholars" must speak to the ummah on the basis of daleel. If they want to ignore the Islamic evidence and give their personal opinions instead, they should keep their mouths shut!!!
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
100 years absence of caliphate - result - Muslims and humanity at large suffering - and it is just gotten worse (exponentially). We must strive to bring back Islam as a deen (Khilafah) as the number one objective - this is the hukum of Allah SWT to all Muslims - it is the mother of all the fards. If Khilafah were to be present today, you will not see anything close to the genocide of gaza or kashmir or sudan or .... demand for the return of Khilafah. May Allah SWT elevate the ummah to be steadfast in reviving the Khilafah and restoring human dignity for the oppressed. May Allah SWT make Gaza (land of shuhada) the spark that revived the Khilafah - Ameen
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
@@TheUnknownMAS This was also true for Prophet Muhammad PBUH - as long as the sincere muslims stay on the one straight path shown by our beloved PBUH, we will be fine. Haq will nock the brains out of all the battil. People like YQ and the likes are going against Allah SWT for mere bread crumbs of dunyah. I feel sorry for them for their biggest loss in the hereafter. May Allah SWT protect all of the sincere from being the instrument of iblees/zionist against Islam - Aameen
@@foo5538 Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct : Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step! Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part! Examples of Priorities, Quran 31 :13 says Tawhid is before obeying parents. In hadith a Man was told go back to your parents and make them like like you made them sad before joining me. Again step by step. Quran 9 .122 says don't send all out to fight, some need to stay to learn & teach din!
@@marxistsabusegermansatn-bu38 The aqeedah and manhaj is accounted for in the method of revival of the Khilafah and the only source is Prophet Mohammad PBUH. Just like the method for praying 5 times, fasting, eating, drinking, laws of transaction, marriage, etc - all comes from the Quran and Sunnah. So there is no need for humans to make it up. Like I said earlier, there is only one straight path, it includes revival of Islam as a deen. Unfortunately, people think they are so enlightened that they make things up based on logic/philosophical thinking and as a result self interest plays heavy role, making their understanding cloudy/misguided - YQ is a case in point ... YQ is in big trouble in front of Allah SWT for intentionally or unintentionally misguiding people. I have seen his other lectures and he comes across as an agent of the zionist ... he plays with words, at time contradicting himself ... may Allah SWT gives us all hidiyah and hopeful we take it.
NO . BAD IDEA 😮 . 😮A VERY DANGEROUS IDEA 😮 THEY WILL MURDER EACH OTHER, JUST LIKE THE FIRST GENERATION OF THE SAHABA😮 SOO MUCH BLOOD, SOO MUCH HATE, SOO MUCH WARS SOO MUCH MURDER , SOO MUCH SORROW OF THE FOLLOWERS . 😮😢😮 MILLIONS WILL DIE 😮 AND HE KNOW IT😮.
Sahaba didnt bury the Prophet (pbuh) before sorting out matter of Khilafa and this guy thinks its not a high priority 😃 This is Yale American approved Islam
This Shaykh is exceptionally knowledgeable. However, on this topic, he should have just stuck to a historical point. I think his views are a little misguided on this one.
They delayed the burial to ensure there’s a successor (khaleefah) to avoid fitnah in the context that a state was already established. It’s a completely different thing. Unfortunately you’re missing all the right points the Shaikh is making because of your preconceived idealised notions… it’s also pretty self evident that many if not most of the khulafaa of the past were pretty wayward - at 16:35 for example he mentions all the civil wars they were having. Even glorifying the date of 3rd march 1924 is naive. Whatever khilaafah was there was pretty poor and degenerated for a long time before that.
@@mzaalam It is not about the personality of a specific person, it is about the implementation of the rule and fulfilling the fard. Let me ask you this if I am not praying correctly should I correct my salah or just quit it because I am not performing it correctly?
Some parts are agreeable, and some are not. He is my favourite scholar who speaks some sense among the lot, but mistakes are mistakes, and we don't need to be loyal to human. Not agreeable, - if establishment of khilafah is fard ul kifayah, then it is fard al kifaya and from what evidence he ranks fard al kifayah ? - Yes, kilafah will not assure events like Gaza never take place, but only under a kilafah such protection of ummah is possible. With nationalist governments that think only about its regime will not take up muslim suffering outside their regime as their own. - though salahudeen took up the fathimath dynasty under his control, after noorudin zenky's death he was the khalif and under that role he regained Jerusalemmasjidul aqsa. So always kilafah has been a sheld to muslims though sometime it didn't act as such. Inshort without a kilafah no scheld at all. - there is enough evidence to give the importance of kilafah from the quran, sunnah, and ijmah as sahabah. I'm a bit surprised to see he is not giving the first spot as a fard al kifayah to it. Point that can be agreed with him - yes, prophet established kilahfah in a peaceful means, the whole community in madina given that leadership to him, toppling government to establish will create more fithna. - it's true those who are only waiting for kilafah to establish to solve problems are day dreamers that do nothing. - Not sending home evil rulers by voting against them ( and muslims having a power with vote bank) , protesting against genocide, helping them by finance are more valuable when needed than just talking about kilafah at that time in need. - agree with unifying muslim countries without any political conspiracy and with a long-term goal of coming under one leadership.
Selim II did try to help Moriscos, but the Ottoman navy was defeated at the Battle of Lepanto in 1571 by the Spanish navy. So, it would be an overstatement to say the Ottomans did nothing. A more appropriate statement would be: the Ottoman effort was not enough to prevent the massacre of Muslims in a faraway land, which can be attributed to various reasons. Also, except for some teenagers, most people talking about Khilafah do not think of it as an end goal, it's more of a means to start uniting the ummah. As the shaikh points out, a Khilafah doesn't have to resemble one of the past. However, is it impossible to call the President or Chairman of a conglomerate a Khalifah? Plus, like the EU, we could still travel between ourselves without visas, which can enhance the bonding between different Muslim cultures and any tension or racism, which there maybe, can be reduced and an ideal Khalifah may not be that far-fetched.
Ibn Hazm said: “What indicates a person’s weak religion and fear of God, is that he seaks for an opinion that suits his desire.” ● {al-Ikham v. 5, p. 64}
Cz he knows well that his opinion is neither rational and practical nor aligned with shariah. It's just an attempt to create distraction for the muslim from khilafah.
Jzk. This was a very concise clarification and breakdown of the idea of a Khilafah. Key points in the vague order presented: The average Muslim must perfect their own personal practise of the din; qualified and trained scholars can talk amongst themselves for a vision of what Islamic governance can look like. Muslims can live outside the Dar-ul-Islam and can live in side the Dar-ul-Baqt (House of contract, non-hostile political unit; citation: Imam Shafi during the Caliphate). This applies to both when there is and isn't a Caliphate (citation: Sira- some comapnians lived in Habesha for 15 years in total, during the time of the prophet - even when he acquired power in Yathrib) Politics is a tool that can be used ethically or not; Islamic governance is not immune to becoming corrupt as history shows. We must not idealise history of the khalifah. Having a Khalifah does not automatically grant it superpower status. There are at least 2 conditions that must be met: (1) The leadership must be righteous and just because politics is a necessarily corrupting influence. (2) the leadership must have sufficient political, economic, (cultural), and military muscle. (Cite: The Ottomans weren't able to help the Muslims of Iberian peninsula). We must have a vision whilst doing the necessary work for both short-term and long-term goals, and avoid being armchair critics. We must strive an Islamic "bloc" (more realistic) rather than a single khalifah (unrealistic, has terrible implications, and not obligatory as some have made out to be).
I am not humiliated protesting, it helps me believe in one ummah, in a united effort against oppression, it helps my imaan, we are doing doing whatever we can to stop the genocide. I am proud!
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
We miss our wonderful Ottoman Khilafa . May Allah be pleased with Sultan Mehmed , Sultan Murad khan , Sultan Ertugrul , Sultan Usman , Sultan Abdul Hamid . May Allah bless their beautiful souls .
If one wants a caliphate one must work for it. The caliphate won't land in anyones lap, they will have to deal with the ugly road ahead. As Muslims we should understand right from wrong and to be able to tell the truthful from the liar so when we see a person with credibility we dont let our biases impact our judgement and our ability to help.
I have a question on Islamic political teaching: given that 1)the characterizing political institution of Islam is the Chaliphate; and 2) the great majority of Muslims throughout the history lived outside any chaliphate: How the doctrine manage to reconcile these two things? Have clear criteria been developed to establish whether a political regime is legitimate or not? I mean: only considering the Middle East, almost 800 years have passed since the fall of the Chaliphate (100 if you recognise the Ottoman's). Over the course of these years, an incredible variety of political systems have been implemented in the Islamic world: lay authoritarian regimes, "democratic" republics, monarchies, etc. What has been (and what is) the majority opinion of the religious authorities on this topic? I'm interested in the traditionally-founded doctrine, not the fundamentalist nor the liberal one. For example: today a Tunisian man (or an Iraqi, or a Turkish) who also wants to be a good muslim, should he consider his country's political regime legitimate or not? I suppose the first one, so I'd like to know on what basis scholars and religious authorities do affirm this (or if maybe their consider the actual regimes legitimate but still less than the caliphate)
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8. Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Khilafah is a mother of all the fard - Mr Yasir Qadhi is way off on the approach to reviving Islam as a deen (Khilafah). His approach pleases the zionist. If truly he is sincere, then he should meet with the scholars who understand the method of reviving Islam as a deen (Khilafah) on the path of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). He is making up the method of revival from his own flawed understanding. There is no clergy in Islam. Every muslim is responsible for gaining this knowledge (method of establishing Khilafah on the path of our beloved prophet PBUH). Otherwise the muslims will continue to be misguided and will continue to suffer. Allah SWT will punish us for not gaining this fundamental basic knowledge to worship Him SWT the right way. May Allah SWT guide us all.
LOL! No it ain't. Establishing governments is not a fard, it's actually a big fantasy and delusion. Just look it what happen to the ISIS khilafah or the Taliban khilafah. Absolute disasters. As a muslim, I say thanks but no thanks.
The ottomans actually did a lot for the Spanish Muslims. Many of the Muslims of Spain moved to the Ottoman lands and the sultan sent navy ships to weaken the Spanish navy. The fact that he could not indulge in an all out war was because he was defending Islam via war in the Balkans which appears to be a noble and valid excuse.
It seems like you have underestimated the importance of the khilafah. I will advice you to look at how the ulama in the past have described khilafah. Imam al Qurtubi mentions it as a pillar of islam on which all other pillars rest. As for the level of its wajib, imam al Shafi' describes it as the crown of all wajibat. This is because you cannot implement all of islam without it. At least 2/3 of islam cannot be implemented without the khilafah. In the end we are all responsible of getting it back, since it is wajib (even if you might disagree with the level of its wajib).
@@jamieammar6131 How do you know he would say different things today? Do you know ghaib? This is not about Shafi' or other ulama. It is about following the Quran and the Sunnah brother. These ulama know the ahkam better then us, so when they mention khilafah as something important in islam, it is because so many ahkam depends on it. The real question is, would the prophet saw have said the same thing if he lived here today? Yes, because Allah swt says that islam cannot be changed and is applicable at all times and in all places. Khilafah will be implemented soon, with or without you, and we will all be responsible for our decisions we have made in this life.
@@abdulrahmanissa346 I don't know the ghaib, neither do you. But I'm not dwelling in hypotheticals and fantasy. Your first and foremost duty is to your family and then to your community. Then you can think about the rest of the world. As sheikh said, one can't even make sure whether the people in the community are praying or not, worrying about the grand scheme of things.
Others have already refuted His stance, but ill add one more point to show the importance of Khilafah, Rasoolullahs body wasn't even buried before the successor was chosen among the sahabah.
It was rotting for 3 whole days while Abu Bakr was solidifying support to be declared a caliph before they burried him. The politicing and struggle for power caused the first schism in Islam where the ummah split into two, sunni and shia. Abu Bakr initiated the first instance of muslims killing fellow muslims for politics. He launched a campaign of anihilation agaisnt those who openly revolted against his accession as caliph. They believed Muhammad wanted Ali to replace him. Dont ignore the shahih muslim and other hadith that shows Abu Bakr n Ummar defying the prophets commands in the last few days of his life. Ummar stood guard beside the prophets death bed. You should research history. Its laughable how ignorant you are when you say the caliph was selected unanimously and so quickly. They left the body of the prophet for three whole days while they went off to struggle for power.
@@hilal_younusread your own comments. Islam says Prophets bodies dont rot. It never said Muhammads didnt. They were not only busy politicing on whose going to lead but there were also those who thought he will rise after 3 days. Read your own history bud
Abu Hafs Umar al-Nasafi (rh.a.) a noted scholar of the 6th century Hijri states; "The Muslims simply must have an Imam (Khaleefah), who will execute the rules, establish the Hudud (penal system), defend the frontiers, equip the armies, collect Zakah, punish those who rebel (against the state) and those who spy and highwaymen, establish Jum'ah and the two 'Eids, settle the dispute among the servants (of Allah), accept the testimony of witnesses in matters of legal rights, give in marriage the young and the poor who have no family, and distribute the booty".
Quran 2;204 And of the people is he whose speech pleases you in worldly life, and he calls Allāh to witness as to what is in his heart, yet he is the fiercest of opponents.
Imam an-Nawawi (rh.a.) said, "Ijma'oo 'alaa annahu yajib 'alal-Muslimeena nasabun Khaleefah". "(The scholars) consented that it is an obligation upon the Muslims to select a Khaleefah". (Sharhu Sahih Muslim page 205 vol 12)
If there's a need for unity and leadership, then surely it's now, look what happened to the Ummah after it's collapse, Muslims became fragmented, disunited and weak, they became easy pickings for it's enemies, our history is testimony to some form of unity and leadership, though not perfect, but look what happens when there's no khilafa, pretty self evident.Unity and leadership brings izzah and might otherwise why were our enemies be so determined to put an end to it, let those who have knowledge and expertise in this field continue the good work, we must support it and at the same time continue with all the other good work.
Brother when was the ummah united? Tell me since the day othman RA died till today there’s was no unity between the ummah that is the reality we need to accept first. Muslim we’re fighting each from the first century we need to adress the root of disunity and deal with it before discussing the concept of unity.
Now is no time for weakness. We either stand as one or fold… and let down all the ones that have passed before us.. now is our time if not now then when? No time like the present as they say 😂
Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct : Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step! Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part!
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
The reestablishment of Khilafah on the method of Prophethood is an obligation upon all the Muslims. "The Khilafah is the pillar upon which other pillars rest". - Imam al-Qurturbi
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
Do you know what relative means? For example, how to perform hajj is very important, but not relevant for most of your life. It wouldn't make sense for you to learn the rituals and fiqh of hajj, before you were ready to complete the hajj. Same principle applies here. Khilafah is a long ways away from our reality.
May Allah bless Shaikh Yasir. What he said makes sense. We work for our ideologies but should not attack others for doing the essential tasks that the Muslims have failed to do. We should be united and work and respect each other.
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi. To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events. Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...) What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader! I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba??? All in all very disappointed.
The unity, the United front, the coming together of the ummah your talking about sheikh - is the Khilafah The khilafah unties the ummah under La illah ilalha! There is bond stronger than the bond of Islam -
That alone is enough for us to discount what he is saying in this matter. We don’t need his humble opinion in the issue when Alhamdolillah thousands of imams and scholars globally will stand firm on the Quranic opinion. As we all know personal opinion is not permitted in the shariah. And we have no permission by allah to pick and choose from the faraaid.
Imam al-Haythami said, "A'lamu anna Sahabata- Ridhwaan Allahu 'alayhim -Ajma'oo 'ala anna nasab al-Imaamata ba'd inqiraadhi zaman in-Naboowa waajibon bal ja'aloohu ahamu wajibaat hayth ushtaghloo bihi 'an dafani rasool illah". "It is known that the Sahabah (r.a.h) consented that selecting the Imaam after the end of the era of Prophethood was an obligation (Wajib). Indeed they made it (more) important than the (other) obligations whilst they were busy with it over the burial of the Prophet (saw)". (al-Haythami in Sawaa'iq ul-haraqah:17.)
Shaykh is talking about the same doubts about which he was answered by Imam Tom Facchine and Ustadh Uthman Badar and yet he is bringing up the same points. So basically he did not learn anything from that discussion or does not want to which is so sad. It is so true that every son of Adam will make mistake.
@@abdalrahmanhasan6150 .so disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi. To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events. Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...) What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader! I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba??? All in all very disappointed.
Yasir Qadhi is a true scholar and it is a joy watching him. He is so different from Wahabis/Salafis who breathe hatred for other Muslims, and serve only western powers.
How important is Hajj? Its also conditional on capacity but its importance cannot be undermined based on this logic. As for living outside of its not backup plan, rather there were benifits for them to be there, and it will continue to have such benifits (not overthrow but to prolestize
Alhamdulillah this ummah is not as brainwashed to think that Khilafat is not so important...when compared to the ulama of this Ummah...who deny khilafat ... Alhamdulillah Allahumma baarik alaikum my dear brothers and sisters
Every Muslim will agree it is necessary to have a unity among the Ummah. Discussions on the way forward must start, debates, gather ideas. Most important we will continue with prayers for Allah to guide us and establish a Khalifa. It does not necessarily to be a copy of past Khalifas, but one unifying person or office. May Allah ease our endeavour.
What I don't understand is: we can work ('without being a fifth column') to build a muslim block, but we can't work to establish the compulsory block of Islam. I love to listen to Sheikh Yasir, but I have noticed lots of contractions as well in some areas. جزاك الله خيرا for talking about this important matter despite the disagreements. From a theological & practical point of view we can have only ONE leader. We all agree khilafah is compulsory. Do we really think Allah will give us power & honour without working for it? This is common sense. Being in charge of mankind won't happen only because we are good muslims. We shouldn't have a negative approach towards something Allah mandated us to have (لتحكم بين الناس). Let's obey Allah without thinking of all the possible obstacles that may or may not take place after having a khilafah. One last point: working towards it doesn't mean anything more than normalising this concept, talking about it, believing the shariah of Allah is superior than any other deen, making duaa for it. Many of us already do all of this. Incidents like Gaza are helping us to do more of it الحمد لله. Justice is round the corner ان شاء الله
Again with the daydreaming statements. I appreciate the passion. But..who's gonna be the khalifah ? An Arab ? Why ? Why not someone from India or Pak or Bangladesh or Indonesia..those places inhabit the most Muslims. Why would the Arabs accept the leadership of someone who's not an Arab ? And that's just one of hundreds of issues you would face on the way. And as Sheikh has said, absolute power corrupts. So 100% a person with absolute power, would be corrupt. No matter the faith.
I understand his point of view the reason being is if muslim world be a greater threat this guys will have us nuked for nothing while us have a very few nukes like that of pakistan i know of
Even if power corrupts, the obligation of having one single ameer is still pending on our necks. Many of the ahkaam can't be implemented without the ameer, including the distribution of zakat. Someone recently said muslims collect 480 bl a year (I guess GBP). With just a fraction of it, poverty would become history in places like Africa بإذن الله. Who is the leader is not the main thing, implementing the deen is. This is actually one of the things we need to work on: getting ready for the full implementation of Islam. It's on us trying to speed that process up. Some of us are still influenced by nationalistic ideas, rather than being concerned about the shariah of Allah (judiciary, penal code, land laws, water laws, education, foreign affairs, etc.) Allah will give us His victory when He deems us ready for it and when He wants it. He (swt) mandated us these laws, hence He will make a way out for us to implement them. Be sincere and keep on making duaa.
@@shafimiah7149 Yes, it's an obligation, no denying that. But we are also humans. Not other beings. Nationalistic ideas, identities etc have been in us since the dawn of time. Arabs united for a short while under the Prophet and the Rashiduns but after less than a century same ol same ol. So even if you somehow hypothecalliy manage to get the Muslims under a single ameer, it won't last long. You have to answer those tough questions which I've mentioned before you even begin to think of unity. I'll give you a simple example. Why would the Muslims of Bangladesh would ever unite under let's a say a Pakistani ameer where the Bengalis fought and sacrificed millions of lives to separate from them in the first place ? And you brought up Africa. It's not like wealthy Muslims don't wanna help the poor folks there. But all the donations go to the corrupt leaders there, so the charity people don't even bother. You wanna take down the corrupt leaders ? Good luck with that. Humans are easy to manipulate. The leaders will manipulate the people against you. Hence, trying to establish a khalifa will end in endless bloodshed. Brother, you aren't the first person to have such sentiments, certainly won't be the last. Reality and human nature are much different compared to hypotheticals. There are dozens of not hundreds of groups in Africa trying to establish their own caliphate. Result ? More division and bloodshed.
@jamieammar6131 brother your points are sincere questions but I humbly request you to get some knowledge on this topic. I could feel your points are more emotional than rational. If it's Hukum of Allah rhn no matter what we need to act upon it, wether we like it or not, situation allows it or not. You need to study Seerah of Rasool Allah to learn how he (pbuh) was able to achieve uniting the most divided Arabs and beyond.
I believe that the need for Khilafah is more necessary now than ever due to the suppression and persecution of Islam and Muslims including Muslim countries. The ummah needs both religious and political unity. Muslim countries actually do have military strength they just don't use it. I agree that it should begin with a unified bloc of military snd economic cooperation and does not need to look like it did in the past.
If muslims do not fear Allah i.e not praying 5 times, consuming/paying interest, zina etc etc, how can you expect them to cultivate a strong khilafa? The soil must be good before you water it.
@@spawnnpwn4166daulah Madinah intially only supported by few hundreds people while the rest still not yet pray, still engulfed in riba and other jahiliya way of life
@@spawnnpwn4166 those are also important and should be worked on hand in hand. But if we take the one at a time approach, we will never accomplish anything. The Khilafah was ended more than once in history but the ulema and mujahideen prioritized its reestablishment. Keep in mind that there is no way to eradicate riba other than having a system that is not built on riba. A society that does not prioritize Salah is one whose educational system and lifestyle revolves around secular priorities. When a society legalizes fahisha, zina will be rampant. Without Khilafah, all of the above will be harder to accomplish. With that said, those who are calling for and working towards its establishment should ensure that they are engaged in rigorous spiritual tarbiya as was the case of the earlier sahaba before hijra, and ensure that they are changing what is within themselves so that Allah can bring about change for the ummah.
The discussion begins with Mecca and Madina and those who betrayed Islam in the 1920's and implemented monarchies in Jazirat Al Arab. Keep in mind after establishing a Khilafah, how will the rest of the Ummah look at the leader if he over stays his Saudi Visa and forced out of the capital cities of Islam? We have to first have that uncomfortable conversation that many Shiekhs, Scholars, and Imams avoid because they're scared or are bought and sold... Sorry not sorry
Imam Muslim narrated from Abu Hazim who said: I was with Abu Hurairah for five years and I heard him narrate from the Prophet (SAW) that he said: "The Prophets used to rule Bani Israel. Whenever a prophet died another prophet succeeded him, but there will be no prophets after me; instead there will be Khulafaa' (Khalifahs) and they will number many". They asked: what then do you order us? He said: "fulfil allegiance to them one after the other. Give them their dues. Verily Allah will ask them about what he entrusted them with". This Hadeeth is a clear statement of the fact that the form of government in Islam, after the Prophet (SAW) is the Khilafah, and not an Islamic Republic, Islamic Socialist Republic or Islamic Imarah.
What? A khilafah is a tool, but not the End goal??? Is our brother ok? Surah 8:73 As for the disbelievers, they are guardians of one another. And unless you ˹believers˺ act likewise, there will be great oppression and corruption in the land.
I'm pretty sure that among 1.8 billion people, we can come up with a good method to truly select a pious person as a leader, it isn't too difficult of a task
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
One of the protections against trials in the grave is any beneficial knowledge about Islam and Allah that you shared with others in this world. This Ramadan, share your favorite hadith, or teach someone your favorite surah or post a spiritual reminder for others! And get Allah's blessings and protection in the hereafter! May Allah give you multiple folds of good deeds this month
Indeed Imam is a Sheild behind whom you fight and you get protected. ( Musnad Ahmed). We dont have our shelid from past 100 years and we know what is happening to us till date. Only Khilafah can unify us and its one of the main obligation which is been neglected. Scholars call Khilafah to be Umm ul Faraiz ( mother of all obligation). Dont fall into the trap of ignoring it.
Jazakallahu khayr Sheikh for the very practical approach. Others can enlighten us too. But simply spreading skunk water to foot solders of the Ummah is blameworthy. Ist step of establishing Khilafa can be to promote peaceful coexistence, helping the needy and making habit of praying Tahajjud.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
What about next steps for establishing Khilafah, please give detailed roadmap because people are not gonna start until they understand the process and this is for every process. So don't just say that only practicing some rituals are enough for being success in this world and the next world
“When you in power you have ultimate authority to do as you please” I couldn’t agree more my respected sheikh. Today Muslims are just obsessed with khilafah, there is more to it than their obsession. we should all study history, shred our ignorance and learn more. The same people calling for khilafah will eventually destroy it when it’s established. Today we cannot even agree with each on minor religious differences and issues without calling for each other’s heads. Our lack of organisation collectively and individually has led to our weakness. We are many in numbers yet can’t rock ant. The sahabah were few yet their impact in grand scheme of things was immense. If our nabbiy ﷺ were to be alive today some of us will challenge his authority with our attitude that’s the reality of state of affairs. We cannot change and remained the same. Allah will not change our situation until we change our ways.
The reason the regular muslim is struggling with their deen is because of the absence of the khilafah though... so how can a khilafah not be the top priority? I don't understand this.
how is the regular muslim struggling with their deen because of the lack of khilafah? Does the regular muslim not now how to pray or that it is a fard? What is keeping the regular muslim from fullfilling his obligations to Allah? The lack of a political leader? I don't understand your reasoning
Ibn Taymiyyah (rh.a.) said, "Yajib an yo'rafa anna wilayata amr in-naasi min a'thami waajibaat id-Deen, Bal laa qiyaamu li-Deen illa bihaa". "It is obligatory to know that the office in charge of commanding over the people (ie: the Khilafah post) is one of the greatest obligations of the Deen. In fact, their is no establishment of the Deen except by it....this is the opinion of the salaf, such as al-Fadl ibn 'Iyaad, Ahmed ibn Hanbal and others". (Siyaasah Shariyyah - chapter: 'The obligation of adherence to the leadership'.)
Yasir use to support same sex relations. Yasir use to support secular politicians. Yasir helped the Christian evangelists with his confused comments about the authenticity of the Qur'an. Now this veiled opposition to the struggle for the Khilafah.
This is why Sheikh Yasir Qadhi is Sheikh ul Islam in my opinion, he brings about visionary concepts that would benefit the Ummah, may Allah bless him and his family, Ameen
I think you missed the point of the lecture. He literally said don’t be like the hypocrites who criticized the ‘small’ or ‘unpopular’ efforts. He just is saying think creatively about the future of the ummah
The EU has no Islam, European countries are only connected for geopolitical reasons. Europeans are not united by brotherly bonds and their common goal is not unity but political domination of the world and the greatest possible profit. When it comes to the solution that Allah SWT gave us, the union of Muslim countries is exactly that.
I do get what he means about thinking out of the box and coming up with our own solutions. But the EU are not the best example and the US is not exactly friendly like Abyssinia. I agree with him in helping as little as possible but there are also other points I disagree with. There is more than the eyes can see.
Imaam al-Ghazali (rh.a.) when writing of the potential consequences of losing the Khilafah said, "The judges will be suspeneded, the Wilayaat (provinces) will be nullified, ... the decrees of those in authority will not be executed and all the people will be on the verge of Haraam". (al Iqtisaad fil Itiqaad page 240.)
Ok, I agree it would only work if the Khalifa was a righteous Muslim, so what is your answer? We replace Biden with a good leader? Coz that’s going to work 🙄
This is the most realistic talk I have heard in a while. The first problem we need to cure in this Ummah is illusion. We need to start living in the present instead of dwelling in the past. It's ironic that we want to talk about Khalifa while we are centuries behind in science, economics, technology, politics (actually every field you can imagine). We can't solve problems with emotions. Please wake up
Ibn Hazm said: “What indicates a person’s weak religion and fear of God, is that he seaks for an opinion that suits his desire.” ● {al-Ikham v. 5, p. 64}
“The Muslims only conquered the world and took control over it, by the justice of ‘Umar, the fiqh of Mu'adh, the hadith of Abu Hurayra, the zuhd (abandoning the dunya with piety) of Abu Dhar and the courage of Khalid bin Waleed رضي الله عنهم. They did not conquer it by the signals of Ibn Sina nor by the sharpness of Ar-Razi. Nor by the optics of Ibn Al-Haytham and nor by the music of Al-Farabi." - Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd فك الله اسره
Salaam to all, and Ramadan Kareem to all. I just wanted to say as a Shia, this imam may Allah protect him is one of the few Sunni imams I listened to on youtube. He is Great mashallah... May ALLAH Guide us all
Waleykumsalam salam.. Akhi you are Muslim and will always be my brother in Islam..what matters most is your deeds ..no Shia nor Sunni..just Muslims if we are to defend our families… we have been divided by maqadilis and the evil workers of the west… it’s time we stand fast - brother from Somalia …
According to him: Thieves should become righteous then he would talk about bringing the law and order. 1- it's Fard but don't think of doing it! 2- will you go to Jannah if there is Khilafa? Khilafa will insure to build a most pure and righteous society by commanding Maroof and stopping munkar. Today We are being pulled from every corner of kufr that we have very less chances to avoid haram. Riba, sexuality, and what not. 3- Previously Khilafa was corrupted. So what who wants corrupted Khilafa? We want Khilfa-e-Rashidah.. we have so many case studies to learn from...they couldn't save muslim in Andalusia hence today Khilafah cannot save Gaza! What a lame excuse. 4- People calling to Khilafa opposing others r like Munafiq? Wow! people who are calling to establish Allahs order are labelled n refered like munafiq did! He cannot get way with this for sure. 5- for him European union seems to be an ideal structure. While lot of contradicting points. " I am not opposing" but it's not required! I am not against it but it's not realistic. Delusional and distracting, specially at the time when Ummah is trying to unite. And the call of unity was so loud and clear all around. May Allah open our eyes to see the Haq.
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi. To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events. Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...) What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader. I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba??? All in all very disappointed.
1. It's a fard which he agrees with 2. But it's doesn't hold great importance compared to other fard (here he misses the point of how it affects the other obligations) 3. He doesn't see the importance of how everyone can be effective in calling for the state as he doesn't share the same methodology as the Hizb (public opinion and nusra) 4. Establishing a masjid and madrassa is not greater than establishing a Khilafah. The Khilafah uses the states funds to set up these structures. At the present moment, our Islamic schools and mosques are monitored by the western state of what we say and do and ensure we follow their guidelines, such as promoting British values, or what an imam can and can not say having undercover prevent officers in the masjids 5. He shows we have a defeatest mindset by saying we can't establish a Khilafah. (You can't if you don't work for it) 6. You don't need a KHILAFAH to enter jannah and vise versa. Pointless comment. However working for Khilafah will earn you great reward and fulfil the duty of the fard and maybe you will be accountable for doing nothing at all? Having a Khilafah will help create an environment to be help people gain Jannah 7. He makes. It like a dream in the future, maybe not in our life time and to just believe in the concept but there is nothing you can do about it, worry about tangible acts... Again this is because he doesn't value it's importance, defeatest mindset and no methodology. 8. Not sure about the Abasiniya part. 9. Muslim living in the western land to accept status quo? So allow the west to bomb, kill, rape, steal wealth from Muslim lands and accept it? No demos for Gaza? But then he will say get involve with the political elections and use their method to choose better leaders that benefit Muslims when in reality neither party ever benefits Muslims. Abasinyya wasn't at war with the Muslims. So again a different reality. Maybe apply that concept in Brazil and stay out of the political mess. 10. To my understanding go to the west for money, education and dawah is a temporary thing, not permanent? 11. Politics corrupts the soul. Yes if done wrongly and if done rightly it is amazing. 12. People seeking power and causing bloodshed happens. People want to get in power to be the one that serves well because they think they can do a better job. This is normal and happens in plenty of circumstances, especially in businesses. 13. Gaza will have a chance because it requires military intervention and only a righteous leader will do this. It's evident right now that no one is willing to do anything about it 14. If we had a Khilafah, we will be in a better situation than we are in now. Life under the khilafah even in its bad days is better than life without the Khilafah. 15. Salahuddeen didnt have support from Khilafah.... 16. You have armchair critics who do nothing and then you have those who don't criticize but remind you the correct way moving forward. That's called positive criticism. 17. This idea that something is better than nothing can also be problematic. Can't simply do anything. 18. Agree, those who work for Khilafah do there thing and those who want to do other things do there thing, however if that other thing is wrong, it should be taken to account. 19. No one is mocking those who do good deeds. Even if it ain't going to do anything, a good deed is a good deed. 20. Yes most likely a Khilafah will have blood and a revolution. I can't see any way. 21. Comparing EU and Unifying the Muslims states... Our leaders are put in place and controlled by the West. This is a. Lot of political nativity here. 22. He calls for Muslim unity whilst accept the British made borders hoping that we can have unity by having all these leaders accepting the nationalistic states we have today. That ain't a reality nor should we want that.
The corruption hides behind big titles like Dr. So when the Dr. speaks, everyone must agree because the speaker is the Dr. But in reality, those who see the implementation of the shari'ah of Islam equal to the implementation of any other ruling system. Those are the ones who Allah meant in the verse: {الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ وَجَعَلَ الظُّلُمَاتِ وَالنُّورَ ۖ ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِرَبِّهِمْ يَعدِلُون} [All] praise is [due] to Allah, who created the heavens and the earth and made the darkness and the light. Then those who disbelieve equate [others] with their lord. 1 surat Al An'am. May Allah protect us.🤲😔
As if the similar problems are not happening and similar type of atrocities are not being committed today by the secular powers! We have justice - which is Islam, and its establishment is Khilafah. If some past caliphs or sultans from a very long 1300 history commit some crimes and bad deeds, should we say that Khilafah is not good, or Islam is not good due to those misappropriations. No! Islamic system can bring justice and peace, if applied correctly, so the term - Khilafah Rashidah - succession of the prophet (SAW) righteously, best possible solution. But people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
Sheikh, thank you for making it clear that if the mahdi appears we dont have to join him, and if a Khalifa appears and aims for palestine we dont have to join his army. I was losing sleep over the possibly inconvenience involved but now can sleep easy.
@@Muhammet-Kuruoglu I am not an expert. But I had wished if we had our own brands from clothing, food, groceries to automobiles. Simple policy of buying things from Muslims.
@@Drfau1710 you can already buy from muslims only in most non muslim countrys. Nothing is stopping you. Khilafah is not going to make you buy anything differently
@@Muhammet-Kuruoglu years of colonisation has created western culture as the dominant culture. Most of the world including muslims are trying to imitate westerner in what they eat or what they wear. We need to recolonise their minds.
Dr. Qadhi's suggestions are very pragmatic and certainly an interim solution until Allah establishes the Khilafa on Earth (because only the might of Allah can make it happen). His approach was actually adopted by the Indian Muslim sultans against the Hindu oppressor Kings, but the last such confrontation broke their backs making it easy for the British to gain a foothold in India :)
Just look at the situation of Muslims today without a khalifah. The fact that billions of Muslims couldn't help their brothers is more than enough evidence that a khalifah is a must to be established.
List 5 person who you think is capable of being a Khalifa.
It isn't for him/not you to decide. When one is chosen you will know.
Give the capabilities to your own generation rather than saying this name it will take may be three generations to establish if you try to do your work
@@mumin.azraaqyou sound like a Khalifa is like a prophet. We won’t know when some special man will be gifted to us by Allah to become a Khalifa, we have to practice our deen to 1. Recognize la ilaha ill Allah 2. Recognize that each human here on earth has been personally invited to be here by Allah 3. Allah does not force an individual to uphold the rights and privileges set by Islam, so no human should force another human to bend to their will, lest you assume the position of Allah and commit shirk 4. Allah has made man with variation and to respect that variation that He created. Do not expect uniformity among the ummah. Some will be weak and others will be strong and all in between. Some will practice one way and some will practice another. Thru our differences we must reach mutual respect. It is the only way we will learn and grow. Bc Allah created mankind where if everyone agrees, then everyone stops thinking. Allah loves odd numbers, He loves the juxtaposition bc it keeps mankind thinking, learning and growing. So achieve mutual respect, not uniformity.
Once we all recognize this as an ummah, iA then we will have a khilafah.
@muminazraaq2676 when one is chosen?? It is not divinely stipulated.
The problem is the current rulers are on the payroll of those who abolished khilafa in the first place
Yes!!
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct :
Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step!
Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part!
Examples of Priorities, Quran 31 :13 says Tawhid is before obeying parents.
In hadith a Man was told go back to your parents and make them laugh like you made them sad before joining me.
Again step by step.
Quran 9 .122 says don't send all out to fight, some need to stay to learn & teach din!
Gulf nations (rulers) like UAE and Saudi aren't loyal to sheikh MUHAMMAD ibn Abdul
Wahhab anymore unfortunately. They are going another direction, the direction of kufr (liberalism) anti islam etc
b@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
And [remember, O Muhammad], when those who disbelieved plotted against you to restrain you or kill you or evict you [from Makkah]. But they plan, and Allah plans. And Allah is the best of planners.
The reestablishment of Khilafah on the method of Prophethood is fard upon all the Muslims.
Khilafat has already been established by Allah, after the massih and mahdi that has already come...those currently living under the khilafat are benefitting...those who are not do not realise their loss
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Well said, 100% truth
how to establish, what have you done till now
I will briefly respond pointwise on the issues mentioned in the talk by brother Yasir Qadhi:
1. If establishment of Khilafah is fardh kifayah then it should be understood that due to non-establishment of Khilafah, this obligation remains unfulfilled, and consequently the whole Ummah is sinful for neglecting this obligation. This is because unless fardh kifayah is fulfilled, the whole Ummah remains responsible for it, and the sin may only be removed from those who are striving to fulfill the fardh, while those who are negligent will carry the sin of neglecting the fardh. You may not need Khilafah to enter Jannah, but you surely need to strive for its establishment to have an excuse on the Day of Judgement regarding what you were doing while 100 years had passed but this fardh was not fulfilled.
2. It is allowed to live outside Khilafah on temporary basis under the condition that you have permission of the Khalifah. The Muslims of Abyssinia remained there because the Prophet ﷺ allowed them to stay there. However, if a Muslim chooses to live outside the Khilafah permanently or without the permission of the Khalifah then he will be living the life of Jahiliyyah as mentioned in many ahadith of the Prophet ﷺ.
3. The claim is not that if we had Khilafah, Gaza would not have happened. The point is that 57 nation states are not going to do anything about Gaza because Gaza is neither their land nor their nation. It is only Khilafah, based on Islamic ideology, which will consider all Muslims and all Islamic land as its responsibility, whether it is Al-Quds, Kashmir, Burma, USA or Europe. Khilafah is the state which will deal with all the issues based on Islam. The existing nations states have failed in this because none of these are based on Islam, rather all of these are based on nationalism. These states cannot unite the Ummah, rather these are the cause of division of ummah. Whether Khilafah succeeds in liberating Al-Quds depends on other conditions. However, the primary condition is establishment of a political power based on Islam which unifies the Ummah i.e. the Khilafah. Without fulfilling this primary condition, liberation of Al-Quds will remain a dream.
4. Andalusia was lost because it separated from Khilafah, it was never under the rule of Abbasid or Ottoman Caliphate, rather it had it own independent rule. So to say that we lost Andalusia in spite of existence of Ottoman Caliphate is a comment based on ignorance. And the Ottoman Caliphate did send battleships to help the Muslims of Spain, however, by that time Muslim rule had been weakened beyond recovery.
5. Al-Quds was lost to the crusaders because Muslims were divided into two Caliphates i.e. Fatimids and Abbasids. Al-Quds was under the rule of the Fatimids when the Crusaders conquered it, while other Muslims did nothing due to the prevalent political division. The real genius of Salah-ud-din Ayyubi was that he identified the cause of division of Muslims and worked to unite them. The victory which was given by Allah to Sultan Salah-ud-din was after he dissolved the Fatimid Caliphate and united the Ummah under Abbasid Caliphate. Only then he was able to liberate Al-Quds from the Crusaders. So anyone wishing for liberation of Al-Quds has to first unify the Ummah under one banner of Islam, otherwise Allah's help will never come.
6. On the issue of Gaza, it is not enough to say that at least we are trying to do something when we protest or raise funds or write letters to some ruler or senator etc. OK do whatever you can, however, keep in mind that whatever you do should be part of a well thought out plan to eventually liberate Al-Quds. If well educated people just participate in a protest because that is convenient, without having any plan as to how this will eventually lead to liberation of Al-Quds, then all these protests will be futile. Make a plan and put it into action. The initial steps will be small but these steps should be for a bigger aim, not an aim in themselves. The sahabi who donated one date in Tabuk, knew that it was for a bigger aim of waging jihad against the Romans, his donation even though small, was not without any bigger aim. So keep your aim big, plan for it with full diligence, and work on it with full dedication, as you plan and work for the future of your children and grandchildren.
7. The prophet ﷺ told us what a "modern Khilafah" will be like at the end of times. It will be based on the way of the Prophethood (علی منہاج النبوۃ), not on the way of the European Union. So please if you want to strive for Khilafah, then do so for the Khilafah based on Islam, not on some union which kuffar have come up with. Nationalism is an invalid bond as far as Islam is concerned. It was nationalism which destroyed the body of the Ummah, so how can you expect the Ummah to unite while upholding these nationalistic divisions? OIC, Arab League and all other bodies based on nationalism have failed, can't you see that even now? Nationalism is a call of Jahiliyyah which has nothing to do with Islam, so don't call the ummah by the call of Jahiliyyah, call them with the call of Islam. The Ummah will never be united till it replaces the bond of nationalism with the Islamic bond. It is due to absence of Khilafah and division of Muslims into nation states that 2 billions Muslims are watching helplessly while 2 million Muslims in Gaza starve to death right in the heartland of Islam.
So brother YQ, your opinion is not correct, and please don't make establishment of Khilafah a trivial matter because it will have severe consequences in this world as well as the hereafter.
Very well said brother
Brother Subhaan Allah you have refuted each and every point that Yasir had made. May Allah give you HIS blessing.
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi.
To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm.
Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar.
He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Daleel to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events.
Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty.
Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...)
What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader!
I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba???
All in all very disappointed.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Without khilafah muslim ummah is unthinkable
Mind Begs the Question:
- If Islam prescribes
- Caliphate to establish Security
- Sharia Law to establish Justice
- To Ban either is denying Religious Freedom,no?
There is no khilafa in the world right now. Does this mean there are no muslims, no ummah? Muslims can only unite under a khilafah and otherwise it is impossible?
Khifafah is a ‘tool’ that allows the implementation of islam in its entirety….. the social issues you mentioned - building/maintainance of our masajids - educating people to pray etc …
These are actions that will be carried out by the state once it returns InshaAllah. Currently we as an ummah are doing our best but the highest priority of us an an ummah is be work to implement the system of islam holistically!
The idea of a khilafah isn’t a utopian idea…. Things may not be perfect once it’s established, we will face obstacles but that’s doesn’t mean the obligation ceases to exit
Khilafah will be established when the Nusarah is given by the people of power. Eg as we read in the seerah.
Agreed.
Well said. I wonder why RUclips downplays comments like this while promoting more provocative comments…
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
KHILAFA IS A MUST IN THIS PRESENT WORLD ....
Lol no
@@EV-EV-EV
Yes.
@@mohammadqais9194 it will fail
Of course yes, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
How come he said that Khilafah is not as not important as ibadat and Muamalat whereas tho muslim scholar declares that Khilafah is the taajul furudh, main obligation? By Khilafah, most of shariah Will be implemented in the living. And without the khilafah, most of islamic obligation like law, politics and economic system of Islam is not applied.
And ur missing one of the important function of khilafa is security and well being of muslims!!
My understanding is he said it's a community obligation. Though for the average Muslim, your personal worship / behavior should be your primary focus. This is what Allah (God) will ask us about, what was in our hands. People could live under Islamic law but choose not to follow Islam at a personal level. It must come from your heart. At the same time if there was truly righteous overall leader/s (not restrained by financial or political gain), that could increase cohesion across the ummah (community) InshaAllah (God-willing).
And he said its HIS OPINION, HIS IJTIHAD
sabar bro. he gives his opinion on forming a khilafah at 22:40 ++
legal , political, economics can be implemented at national level. doesn't need a khilafah.
I must say, reading the comments brought me joy - many, if not all, of the comments I’ve read have emphatically denied the subordination the caliphate to something else insofar as our Fardh Al Kifaya. Alhamdulilah this Ummah is understanding its authentic solution to modern problems - as well as understanding this, I’ve seen great nuance regarding the fact the a caliphate does not necessitate perfection or a utopic state of politics, but as a tool wherein wider liberation discussions can be had.
pls explain what ur saying... im confused.
I believe that Reestablishing the Khilafa would Strengthen the Ummah Immensely❣️
great. Whats your ethinic or religious background?
@@Onlyme2015 I'm a European, Caucasian, Revert to Islam😍🇵🇸😍Reverted 37 yrs ago, from Atheism, so I've been a Muslim half my life Alhamdulillah❣️
Glad to see people waking up and not blindly listening to him cause he’s famous! Khilfah is a must
Alhamdulillah the Ummah is waking up
I’m afraid you misunderstood what he was saying. Nowhere did he say that a khilafah is not required. He was saying that the ppl are not ready for the khulafah, that we have work to do to build up to it. Which is true. We can’t even manage our own masajid, how will we manage an entire nation? Islam is not abt putting up pretenses, it’s abt building the character of man to reach mutual respect between each other despite our differences in order to grow. Allah made humans different and problems will always exist, but despite that let’s continue to grow ourselves and then reach mutual respect. Thru that we will establish a khilafah iA. Establishing a khilafah doesn’t mean that we will reach utopia. The problems will remain but we will be ready to form a society under Islam iA. Leave the perfection for the hereafter.
@@wc7zr 100% agree. Instantaneously implementing laws that people aren't ready for will bring dispute, but everything should be done step by step.if we look at the siirah of the prophet saw you'll see how everything wasn't made wajib at the begging but little by little For example: Fasting was made obligatory in the second year of hijrah I believe, as for jihad in that same year too. Correct me if I'm wrong
@@PhilosophicalMenacenot only this but there is a misunderstanding that the khilafah should be instated to control the ppl and assert Islam over mankind. This assumption is wrong. The khilafah’s purpose is to defend the rights of mankind and all creation to exist. Allah put us here and the age of prophecy ended with Muhammad (s), so Allah will no longer grant wahi. His communication to us is thru nature, thru unforeseen circumstances and what is sealed in the past is considered Allah’s final decision. Allah then continues to bring new life into existence here, each with its own will, temperament and preferences to grow into as it exists. Allah’s laws are given to allow each of us here to exist as we please. Therefore the khilafah is not there to make sure the ppl follow the laws, but to make sure the the potential to follow those laws are there rather than impede the ability to follow those laws. It is then up to us to exercise our will and make the proper decisions to exercise our ability to exist with the respect that Allah exercises His own will reflected in the dunya we all exist in. The individual has the responsibility to defend our right to exist while respecting our neighbors’ rights to equally exist and respect Allah’s ultimate will to bring everything into existence as He pleases. Those of us that follow his laws decreed in the Quran should be mindful of this understanding. The khilafah must make sure that the potential to follow laws is there, not to force the laws upon mankind. If Allah doesn’t use His will to force mankind despite intimately giving us the ability to exist here, no man can then assert force upon another to control other’s will. That is shirk, and the khilafah cannot be based on shirk.
THE CALL HAS BEEN CRIED, TIME HAS COME TO REUNITE. WAKE UP MY BRETHREN. LETS FREE PALESTINE!!!
☝️
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
❤ for the establishment of true Caliphate.
Like Umar ibn Al Khattab ra
One Amīr is what we need
In sha Allah
Let's unite under one Amīr
Let's bring again the golden era
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
There are so many videos from the people of Gaza screaming out for the Khilafah. The Arab preachers in the Muslim world are discussing the return of the Khilafah in context of what’s happening in Gaza. Unfortunately, some Western Muslim academics and scholars have a very romanticised idea of dawah and revival. Their thinking and vision is extremely narrow, and they can’t think beyond the boundaries of their “institutions”. The call and work for the Khilafah is one of sacrifice, confrontation against the status quo, persecution by the Kuffar - none of which you’ll find in Yasir Qadhi’s type of dawah.
True indeed
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
.
all the things you mentioned need knowledge from dawa.
Leadership is essential for collective success, the Ummah must work towards it, Allah doesn’t promise you’ll win every battle, but without it you have no foundation
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 No one is denying or undermining the fact that tawheed and the fundamentals of the religion are of course important, but this is an ongoing struggle with people, not everyone is at the same level or going to be on all correct beliefs on every matter, this wasn’t the case over the centuries and now, however the efforts and struggles in other areas of Islam didn’t come to a standstill.
The Ummah needs to work in all areas of the religion, leadership is an essential step towards unifying and strengthening the Ummah, and I’m not talking about the state leaders who are mostly subservient to their colonial masters. How can anyone undermine the importance of proper leadership and unity between the already fragmented and weak muslim community
But khilafah will bring unity ,
Will uphold Islamic values,
Did khilafah bring unity in the past? Nope.
Let’s open up history books and read them.
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
@@omowhanre if anyone is reading history books with orientalist glasses, they would be biased with that kind of Islamophobic narratives. Some caliphs were bad, it doesn’t mean Islamic system is bad.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
Brother Sheikh Yasir Qadhi , remember in the 18th 19th century, the offensive plays on Islam and prophet in Europe and how the Ottoman Khalifa handled it, in one incident he threatened the British authorities calling for jihad from Muslims, and the show was canceled. So in my opinion we need a leader, Khalifa to keep in check in global level and to guide the imams around the world
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
@@zaynshah4023
We need to study the seerah and then the Quran . We will understand the Quran v well.
The social, economic and political (khilafah) system makes up a far bigger and more important part of the Deen in comparison to the personal religious rituals that are mandatory for Muslims to perform on a daily basis.
The sad thing is that people limit Islam to just being a religion with a few rituals and spiritual actions and they forget that Islam is a DEEN. And the Deen of Islam encompasses the social, economic and political system Allah and His Prophet PBUH gave us.
Sheikh is very good at all other subjects, just not Khilafah.
Lgbt is another topic he should keep well away from
@@Nusaybah459 subhanallah may Allah protects us from this tongue
Rasool Allah SAW said the only way to protect the blood of the Muslims is to have a khaleefah.
إنما الإمام جنة. يقاتل من ورائه. ويتقى به. (مسلم)
Verily, the Imam (the khaleefah) of the Muslims is a shield. The Muslims fight behind him and are protected by him. (Muslim)
Yasir Qadhi says , " No, no.. forget about all that.. the Europeans have given us a better formula than Rasool Allah SAW. Forget about Khilafah on the method of prophethood. Let's establish a union on the method of the Europeans."
Rasool Allah SAW's command is...
على منهاج النبوة
Yasir Qadhi's formula:
على منهاج الأوروبيين
"Scholars" must speak to the ummah on the basis of daleel. If they want to ignore the Islamic evidence and give their personal opinions instead, they should keep their mouths shut!!!
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
Word✊
100 years absence of caliphate - result - Muslims and humanity at large suffering - and it is just gotten worse (exponentially). We must strive to bring back Islam as a deen (Khilafah) as the number one objective - this is the hukum of Allah SWT to all Muslims - it is the mother of all the fards. If Khilafah were to be present today, you will not see anything close to the genocide of gaza or kashmir or sudan or .... demand for the return of Khilafah. May Allah SWT elevate the ummah to be steadfast in reviving the Khilafah and restoring human dignity for the oppressed. May Allah SWT make Gaza (land of shuhada) the spark that revived the Khilafah - Ameen
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
@@TheUnknownMAS This was also true for Prophet Muhammad PBUH - as long as the sincere muslims stay on the one straight path shown by our beloved PBUH, we will be fine. Haq will nock the brains out of all the battil. People like YQ and the likes are going against Allah SWT for mere bread crumbs of dunyah. I feel sorry for them for their biggest loss in the hereafter. May Allah SWT protect all of the sincere from being the instrument of iblees/zionist against Islam - Aameen
@@foo5538 Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct :
Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step!
Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part!
Examples of Priorities, Quran 31 :13 says Tawhid is before obeying parents.
In hadith a Man was told go back to your parents and make them like like you made them sad before joining me.
Again step by step.
Quran 9 .122 says don't send all out to fight, some need to stay to learn & teach din!
@@marxistsabusegermansatn-bu38 The aqeedah and manhaj is accounted for in the method of revival of the Khilafah and the only source is Prophet Mohammad PBUH. Just like the method for praying 5 times, fasting, eating, drinking, laws of transaction, marriage, etc - all comes from the Quran and Sunnah. So there is no need for humans to make it up. Like I said earlier, there is only one straight path, it includes revival of Islam as a deen. Unfortunately, people think they are so enlightened that they make things up based on logic/philosophical thinking and as a result self interest plays heavy role, making their understanding cloudy/misguided - YQ is a case in point ... YQ is in big trouble in front of Allah SWT for intentionally or unintentionally misguiding people. I have seen his other lectures and he comes across as an agent of the zionist ... he plays with words, at time contradicting himself ... may Allah SWT gives us all hidiyah and hopeful we take it.
NO . BAD IDEA 😮
. 😮A VERY DANGEROUS IDEA 😮
THEY WILL MURDER EACH OTHER, JUST LIKE THE FIRST GENERATION OF THE SAHABA😮
SOO MUCH BLOOD, SOO MUCH HATE, SOO MUCH WARS SOO MUCH MURDER , SOO MUCH SORROW OF THE FOLLOWERS . 😮😢😮
MILLIONS WILL DIE 😮 AND HE KNOW IT😮.
"For the sake of the unmah lets us come together "... jazakAllah khayran Shaykna...❤
He can't let that happen. He wants muslims divided. That's Yasir Qadhis agenda. Alhamdulillah many people can see through him
@@AnonymousStacker I don't think so.
I get the same vibe from him I don't know why doesn't seem genuine @@AnonymousStacker
@@AnonymousStacker provide sources for your claims or may Allah triple the punishment for your false claims for every person that reads your comment.
@@AnonymousStacker
I don't think he is what you say about him but I don't agree with him in regards to the Khelafa.
Sahaba didnt bury the Prophet (pbuh) before sorting out matter of Khilafa and this guy thinks its not a high priority 😃 This is Yale American approved Islam
This Shaykh is exceptionally knowledgeable. However, on this topic, he should have just stuck to a historical point.
I think his views are a little misguided on this one.
They delayed the burial to ensure there’s a successor (khaleefah) to avoid fitnah in the context that a state was already established. It’s a completely different thing. Unfortunately you’re missing all the right points the Shaikh is making because of your preconceived idealised notions… it’s also pretty self evident that many if not most of the khulafaa of the past were pretty wayward - at 16:35 for example he mentions all the civil wars they were having. Even glorifying the date of 3rd march 1924 is naive. Whatever khilaafah was there was pretty poor and degenerated for a long time before that.
@@mzaalam It is not about the personality of a specific person, it is about the implementation of the rule and fulfilling the fard. Let me ask you this if I am not praying correctly should I correct my salah or just quit it because I am not performing it correctly?
Some parts are agreeable, and some are not. He is my favourite scholar who speaks some sense among the lot, but mistakes are mistakes, and we don't need to be loyal to human.
Not agreeable,
- if establishment of khilafah is fard ul kifayah, then it is fard al kifaya and from what evidence he ranks fard al kifayah ?
- Yes, kilafah will not assure events like Gaza never take place, but only under a kilafah such protection of ummah is possible. With nationalist governments that think only about its regime will not take up muslim suffering outside their regime as their own.
- though salahudeen took up the fathimath dynasty under his control, after noorudin zenky's death he was the khalif and under that role he regained Jerusalemmasjidul aqsa. So always kilafah has been a sheld to muslims though sometime it didn't act as such. Inshort without a kilafah no scheld at all.
- there is enough evidence to give the importance of kilafah from the quran, sunnah, and ijmah as sahabah. I'm a bit surprised to see he is not giving the first spot as a fard al kifayah to it.
Point that can be agreed with him
- yes, prophet established kilahfah in a peaceful means, the whole community in madina given that leadership to him, toppling government to establish will create more fithna.
- it's true those who are only waiting for kilafah to establish to solve problems are day dreamers that do nothing.
- Not sending home evil rulers by voting against them ( and muslims having a power with vote bank) , protesting against genocide, helping them by finance are more valuable when needed than just talking about kilafah at that time in need.
- agree with unifying muslim countries without any political conspiracy and with a long-term goal of coming under one leadership.
Yasir Qadhi reeally needs to fine tune his understanding. Sickening.
Selim II did try to help Moriscos, but the Ottoman navy was defeated at the Battle of Lepanto in 1571 by the Spanish navy. So, it would be an overstatement to say the Ottomans did nothing. A more appropriate statement would be: the Ottoman effort was not enough to prevent the massacre of Muslims in a faraway land, which can be attributed to various reasons. Also, except for some teenagers, most people talking about Khilafah do not think of it as an end goal, it's more of a means to start uniting the ummah. As the shaikh points out, a Khilafah doesn't have to resemble one of the past. However, is it impossible to call the President or Chairman of a conglomerate a Khalifah? Plus, like the EU, we could still travel between ourselves without visas, which can enhance the bonding between different Muslim cultures and any tension or racism, which there maybe, can be reduced and an ideal Khalifah may not be that far-fetched.
thought the exact same thing!
The way he keeps repeating "my humble opinion, my humble opinion" 😢 who needs that in these times
Ibn Hazm said: “What indicates a person’s weak religion and fear of God, is that he seaks for an opinion that suits his desire.”
● {al-Ikham v. 5, p. 64}
Cz he knows well that his opinion is neither rational and practical nor aligned with shariah. It's just an attempt to create distraction for the muslim from khilafah.
HOw dare he be humble, outrageous! Lets just discredit him for trying to be humble, right?
Jzk. This was a very concise clarification and breakdown of the idea of a Khilafah. Key points in the vague order presented:
The average Muslim must perfect their own personal practise of the din; qualified and trained scholars can talk amongst themselves for a vision of what Islamic governance can look like.
Muslims can live outside the Dar-ul-Islam and can live in side the Dar-ul-Baqt (House of contract, non-hostile political unit; citation: Imam Shafi during the Caliphate). This applies to both when there is and isn't a Caliphate (citation: Sira- some comapnians lived in Habesha for 15 years in total, during the time of the prophet - even when he acquired power in Yathrib)
Politics is a tool that can be used ethically or not; Islamic governance is not immune to becoming corrupt as history shows.
We must not idealise history of the khalifah.
Having a Khalifah does not automatically grant it superpower status. There are at least 2 conditions that must be met: (1) The leadership must be righteous and just because politics is a necessarily corrupting influence. (2) the leadership must have sufficient political, economic, (cultural), and military muscle. (Cite: The Ottomans weren't able to help the Muslims of Iberian peninsula).
We must have a vision whilst doing the necessary work for both short-term and long-term goals, and avoid being armchair critics.
We must strive an Islamic "bloc" (more realistic) rather than a single khalifah (unrealistic, has terrible implications, and not obligatory as some have made out to be).
MasyaAllah Sheikh, Thank You!
May Almighty Allah guide you and us to the straight path.
I see a touch of sarcasm in this post.
I am not humiliated protesting, it helps me believe in one ummah, in a united effort against oppression, it helps my imaan, we are doing doing whatever we can to stop the genocide. I am proud!
well he has a huge ego and doesn't want to implement Khilafah or work to it so he begs his daddy Biden to stop genocide instead.
Very intuitive of you to suggest this at a pressing time when we need international Islamic leadership
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
We miss our wonderful Ottoman Khilafa . May Allah be pleased with Sultan Mehmed , Sultan Murad khan , Sultan Ertugrul , Sultan Usman , Sultan Abdul Hamid . May Allah bless their beautiful souls .
If one wants a caliphate one must work for it. The caliphate won't land in anyones lap, they will have to deal with the ugly road ahead.
As Muslims we should understand right from wrong and to be able to tell the truthful from the liar so when we see a person with credibility we dont let our biases impact our judgement and our ability to help.
I have a question on Islamic political teaching: given that 1)the characterizing political institution of Islam is the Chaliphate; and 2) the great majority of Muslims throughout the history lived outside any chaliphate:
How the doctrine manage to reconcile these two things?
Have clear criteria been developed to establish whether a political regime is legitimate or not?
I mean: only considering the Middle East, almost 800 years have passed since the fall of the Chaliphate (100 if you recognise the Ottoman's). Over the course of these years, an incredible variety of political systems have been implemented in the Islamic world: lay authoritarian regimes, "democratic" republics, monarchies, etc.
What has been (and what is) the majority opinion of the religious authorities on this topic? I'm interested in the traditionally-founded doctrine, not the fundamentalist nor the liberal one. For example: today a Tunisian man (or an Iraqi, or a Turkish) who also wants to be a good muslim, should he consider his country's political regime legitimate or not?
I suppose the first one, so I'd like to know on what basis scholars and religious authorities do affirm this (or if maybe their consider the actual regimes legitimate but still less than the caliphate)
UNITY OF THE UMMAH BASED ON ISLAM, AND THAT IS THE KHILAFAH. DO YOU WANT TO UNITE UPON ANYTHING OTHER THAN ISLAM??!?
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
In Sha Allah 1st repentance & accepting Allah's laws with Prophet's ways, then Caliph8.
Cuz ths very ummah BETRAYED d Caliph8 106 yrs ago siding with colonials.
May Allah increase our speakers in knowledge and wisdom and unity ameen
Khilafah is a mother of all the fard - Mr Yasir Qadhi is way off on the approach to reviving Islam as a deen (Khilafah). His approach pleases the zionist. If truly he is sincere, then he should meet with the scholars who understand the method of reviving Islam as a deen (Khilafah) on the path of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). He is making up the method of revival from his own flawed understanding.
There is no clergy in Islam. Every muslim is responsible for gaining this knowledge (method of establishing Khilafah on the path of our beloved prophet PBUH). Otherwise the muslims will continue to be misguided and will continue to suffer. Allah SWT will punish us for not gaining this fundamental basic knowledge to worship Him SWT the right way. May Allah SWT guide us all.
LOL! No it ain't. Establishing governments is not a fard, it's actually a big fantasy and delusion. Just look it what happen to the ISIS khilafah or the Taliban khilafah. Absolute disasters. As a muslim, I say thanks but no thanks.
لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
The ottomans actually did a lot for the Spanish Muslims. Many of the Muslims of Spain moved to the Ottoman lands and the sultan sent navy ships to weaken the Spanish navy. The fact that he could not indulge in an all out war was because he was defending Islam via war in the Balkans which appears to be a noble and valid excuse.
It seems like you have underestimated the importance of the khilafah. I will advice you to look at how the ulama in the past have described khilafah. Imam al Qurtubi mentions it as a pillar of islam on which all other pillars rest.
As for the level of its wajib, imam al Shafi' describes it as the crown of all wajibat. This is because you cannot implement all of islam without it. At least 2/3 of islam cannot be implemented without the khilafah.
In the end we are all responsible of getting it back, since it is wajib (even if you might disagree with the level of its wajib).
If Imam Shafi'i was here today, he would have said different things. Stop living in the la la land my guy.
@@jamieammar6131
How do you know he would say different things today? Do you know ghaib?
This is not about Shafi' or other ulama. It is about following the Quran and the Sunnah brother. These ulama know the ahkam better then us, so when they mention khilafah as something important in islam, it is because so many ahkam depends on it.
The real question is, would the prophet saw have said the same thing if he lived here today? Yes, because Allah swt says that islam cannot be changed and is applicable at all times and in all places. Khilafah will be implemented soon, with or without you, and we will all be responsible for our decisions we have made in this life.
@@abdulrahmanissa346 I don't know the ghaib, neither do you. But I'm not dwelling in hypotheticals and fantasy. Your first and foremost duty is to your family and then to your community. Then you can think about the rest of the world.
As sheikh said, one can't even make sure whether the people in the community are praying or not, worrying about the grand scheme of things.
Your short comment is better than the 30 mins talk by Yasir Qadhi
Others have already refuted His stance, but ill add one more point to show the importance of Khilafah,
Rasoolullahs body wasn't even buried before the successor was chosen among the sahabah.
It was rotting for 3 whole days while Abu Bakr was solidifying support to be declared a caliph before they burried him.
The politicing and struggle for power caused the first schism in Islam where the ummah split into two, sunni and shia.
Abu Bakr initiated the first instance of muslims killing fellow muslims for politics.
He launched a campaign of anihilation agaisnt those who openly revolted against his accession as caliph.
They believed Muhammad wanted Ali to replace him.
Dont ignore the shahih muslim and other hadith that shows Abu Bakr n Ummar defying the prophets commands in the last few days of his life.
Ummar stood guard beside the prophets death bed.
You should research history.
Its laughable how ignorant you are when you say the caliph was selected unanimously and so quickly.
They left the body of the prophet for three whole days while they went off to struggle for power.
@@theallseeingeye9388 a lot of words but they're all lies the moment you mentioned the body being rotten.
Prophets Bodies are preserved by Allah (SWT)
@@hilal_younusread your own comments.
Islam says Prophets bodies dont rot.
It never said Muhammads didnt.
They were not only busy politicing on whose going to lead but there were also those who thought he will rise after 3 days.
Read your own history bud
@@theallseeingeye9388...what?
Abu Hafs Umar al-Nasafi (rh.a.) a noted scholar of the 6th century Hijri states;
"The Muslims simply must have an Imam (Khaleefah), who will execute the rules, establish the Hudud (penal system), defend the frontiers, equip the armies, collect Zakah, punish those who rebel (against the state) and those who spy and highwaymen, establish Jum'ah and the two 'Eids, settle the dispute among the servants (of Allah), accept the testimony of witnesses in matters of legal rights, give in marriage the young and the poor who have no family, and distribute the booty".
A nation without Khalifa is like an orphaned child
Khilafat is an absolute obligation and the shield for the ummah.
Quran 2;204
And of the people is he whose speech pleases you in worldly life, and he calls Allāh to witness as to what is in his heart, yet he is the fiercest of opponents.
If you hear an Imam or scholar saying "it's just my opinion, take it or leave it" ... @10:36
Be careful.
Imam an-Nawawi (rh.a.) said,
"Ijma'oo 'alaa annahu yajib 'alal-Muslimeena nasabun Khaleefah".
"(The scholars) consented that it is an obligation upon the Muslims to select a Khaleefah".
(Sharhu Sahih Muslim page 205 vol 12)
If there's a need for unity and leadership, then surely it's now, look what happened to the Ummah after it's collapse, Muslims became fragmented, disunited and weak, they became easy pickings for it's enemies, our history is testimony to some form of unity and leadership, though not perfect, but look what happens when there's no khilafa, pretty self evident.Unity and leadership brings izzah and might otherwise why were our enemies be so determined to put an end to it, let those who have knowledge and expertise in this field continue the good work, we must support it and at the same time continue with all the other good work.
Brother when was the ummah united? Tell me since the day othman RA died till today there’s was no unity between the ummah that is the reality we need to accept first. Muslim we’re fighting each from the first century we need to adress the root of disunity and deal with it before discussing the concept of unity.
A talk of this type during a time like these, is unbelievable. We can't rely on those who are made for us to lead us
Now is no time for weakness. We either stand as one or fold… and let down all the ones that have passed before us.. now is our time if not now then when? No time like the present as they say 😂
Mashallah your right bro
Caleef is a duty, and every duty needs knowledge, so before it we need correct :
Aqidah, Manhaj - priorities to gain more than we lose & implement from individual to society level. This is done at the Masjid level, step by step!
Usul - or principles to connect Aqida or belief to fiqh or everyday rulings. We don't belief in a one ruler umma, everyone has to do there part!
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
The reestablishment of Khilafah on the method of Prophethood is an obligation upon all the Muslims. "The Khilafah is the pillar upon which other pillars rest". - Imam al-Qurturbi
Is the Imam getting revelation or is it just his opinion? It is his opinion.
How is an action fardh khifayah but not important? Can you give other examples?
this man believes in democracy and voting for kuffar rulers.dont take knowledge
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
Do you know what relative means? For example, how to perform hajj is very important, but not relevant for most of your life.
It wouldn't make sense for you to learn the rituals and fiqh of hajj, before you were ready to complete the hajj. Same principle applies here. Khilafah is a long ways away from our reality.
May Allah forgive us all and grant us all Jannatul-Firdaus. Ameen
May Allah bless Shaikh Yasir. What he said makes sense. We work for our ideologies but should not attack others for doing the essential tasks that the Muslims have failed to do. We should be united and work and respect each other.
Thanks for starting a discussion like that which is a real need of the hour.
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi.
To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm.
Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help.
Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events.
Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty.
Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...)
What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader!
I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba???
All in all very disappointed.
@@Salahudin-Islam It seems the call for Khalifah disturbs his comfort and he doesnt like that
The unity, the United front, the coming together of the ummah your talking about sheikh - is the Khilafah
The khilafah unties the ummah under La illah ilalha!
There is bond stronger than the bond of Islam -
❤ well said sis
Glad to see people are not buying his western hegemonic madkhalism. 👍
This ummah needs to inspire the next Salahuddin.
you must be pakistani
what is stopping *YOU* from becomming the next salahuddin? Be the change in the world that you wish to see!
Well this comment section gives me hope as the Muslims here are all about uniting the Ummah more than the speaker himself.
Under what circumstances is it acceptable for the imam of a masjid to speak of an issue of Islam from the perspective of his own ‘humble opinion’?
That alone is enough for us to discount what he is saying in this matter. We don’t need his humble opinion in the issue when Alhamdolillah thousands of imams and scholars globally will stand firm on the Quranic opinion. As we all know personal opinion is not permitted in the shariah. And we have no permission by allah to pick and choose from the faraaid.
Imam al-Haythami said,
"A'lamu anna Sahabata- Ridhwaan Allahu 'alayhim -Ajma'oo 'ala anna nasab al-Imaamata ba'd inqiraadhi zaman in-Naboowa waajibon bal ja'aloohu ahamu wajibaat hayth ushtaghloo bihi 'an dafani rasool illah".
"It is known that the Sahabah (r.a.h) consented that selecting the Imaam after the end of the era of Prophethood was an obligation (Wajib). Indeed they made it (more) important than the (other) obligations whilst they were busy with it over the burial of the Prophet (saw)".
(al-Haythami in Sawaa'iq ul-haraqah:17.)
Shaykh is talking about the same doubts about which he was answered by Imam Tom Facchine and Ustadh Uthman Badar and yet he is bringing up the same points. So basically he did not learn anything from that discussion or does not want to which is so sad. It is so true that every son of Adam will make mistake.
Where can this be found
Sheikh is madkhali
@@shoaibriz he is not lol
@@abdalrahmanhasan6150
.so disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi. To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar. He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events. Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...) What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader! I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba??? All in all very disappointed.
@@shoaibriz Madkhalis hate him
Yasir Qadhi is a true scholar and it is a joy watching him. He is so different from Wahabis/Salafis who breathe hatred for other Muslims, and serve only western powers.
Seems that Mr Qadi is doing a wonderful job serving his western masters.
How important is Hajj? Its also conditional on capacity but its importance cannot be undermined based on this logic.
As for living outside of its not backup plan, rather there were benifits for them to be there, and it will continue to have such benifits (not overthrow but to prolestize
Alhamdulillah this ummah is not as brainwashed to think that Khilafat is not so important...when compared to the ulama of this Ummah...who deny khilafat ...
Alhamdulillah Allahumma baarik alaikum my dear brothers and sisters
Every Muslim will agree it is necessary to have a unity among the Ummah. Discussions on the way forward must start, debates, gather ideas. Most important we will continue with prayers for Allah to guide us and establish a Khalifa. It does not necessarily to be a copy of past Khalifas, but one unifying person or office. May Allah ease our endeavour.
What I don't understand is: we can work ('without being a fifth column') to build a muslim block, but we can't work to establish the compulsory block of Islam.
I love to listen to Sheikh Yasir, but I have noticed lots of contractions as well in some areas. جزاك الله خيرا for talking about this important matter despite the disagreements.
From a theological & practical point of view we can have only ONE leader.
We all agree khilafah is compulsory. Do we really think Allah will give us power & honour without working for it? This is common sense. Being in charge of mankind won't happen only because we are good muslims.
We shouldn't have a negative approach towards something Allah mandated us to have (لتحكم بين الناس).
Let's obey Allah without thinking of all the possible obstacles that may or may not take place after having a khilafah.
One last point: working towards it doesn't mean anything more than normalising this concept, talking about it, believing the shariah of Allah is superior than any other deen, making duaa for it.
Many of us already do all of this. Incidents like Gaza are helping us to do more of it الحمد لله. Justice is round the corner ان شاء الله
Again with the daydreaming statements. I appreciate the passion. But..who's gonna be the khalifah ? An Arab ? Why ? Why not someone from India or Pak or Bangladesh or Indonesia..those places inhabit the most Muslims. Why would the Arabs accept the leadership of someone who's not an Arab ?
And that's just one of hundreds of issues you would face on the way. And as Sheikh has said, absolute power corrupts. So 100% a person with absolute power, would be corrupt. No matter the faith.
I understand his point of view the reason being is if muslim world be a greater threat this guys will have us nuked for nothing while us have a very few nukes like that of pakistan i know of
Even if power corrupts, the obligation of having one single ameer is still pending on our necks. Many of the ahkaam can't be implemented without the ameer, including the distribution of zakat. Someone recently said muslims collect 480 bl a year (I guess GBP). With just a fraction of it, poverty would become history in places like Africa بإذن الله.
Who is the leader is not the main thing, implementing the deen is.
This is actually one of the things we need to work on: getting ready for the full implementation of Islam. It's on us trying to speed that process up. Some of us are still influenced by nationalistic ideas, rather than being concerned about the shariah of Allah (judiciary, penal code, land laws, water laws, education, foreign affairs, etc.)
Allah will give us His victory when He deems us ready for it and when He wants it.
He (swt) mandated us these laws, hence He will make a way out for us to implement them. Be sincere and keep on making duaa.
@@shafimiah7149 Yes, it's an obligation, no denying that. But we are also humans. Not other beings. Nationalistic ideas, identities etc have been in us since the dawn of time. Arabs united for a short while under the Prophet and the Rashiduns but after less than a century same ol same ol. So even if you somehow hypothecalliy manage to get the Muslims under a single ameer, it won't last long.
You have to answer those tough questions which I've mentioned before you even begin to think of unity. I'll give you a simple example. Why would the Muslims of Bangladesh would ever unite under let's a say a Pakistani ameer where the Bengalis fought and sacrificed millions of lives to separate from them in the first place ?
And you brought up Africa. It's not like wealthy Muslims don't wanna help the poor folks there. But all the donations go to the corrupt leaders there, so the charity people don't even bother. You wanna take down the corrupt leaders ? Good luck with that. Humans are easy to manipulate. The leaders will manipulate the people against you. Hence, trying to establish a khalifa will end in endless bloodshed. Brother, you aren't the first person to have such sentiments, certainly won't be the last. Reality and human nature are much different compared to hypotheticals. There are dozens of not hundreds of groups in Africa trying to establish their own caliphate. Result ? More division and bloodshed.
@jamieammar6131 brother your points are sincere questions but I humbly request you to get some knowledge on this topic. I could feel your points are more emotional than rational. If it's Hukum of Allah rhn no matter what we need to act upon it, wether we like it or not, situation allows it or not. You need to study Seerah of Rasool Allah to learn how he (pbuh) was able to achieve uniting the most divided Arabs and beyond.
I believe that the need for Khilafah is more necessary now than ever due to the suppression and persecution of Islam and Muslims including Muslim countries. The ummah needs both religious and political unity. Muslim countries actually do have military strength they just don't use it. I agree that it should begin with a unified bloc of military snd economic cooperation and does not need to look like it did in the past.
If muslims do not fear Allah i.e not praying 5 times, consuming/paying interest, zina etc etc, how can you expect them to cultivate a strong khilafa? The soil must be good before you water it.
@@spawnnpwn4166daulah Madinah intially only supported by few hundreds people while the rest still not yet pray, still engulfed in riba and other jahiliya way of life
@@spawnnpwn4166 those are also important and should be worked on hand in hand. But if we take the one at a time approach, we will never accomplish anything. The Khilafah was ended more than once in history but the ulema and mujahideen prioritized its reestablishment. Keep in mind that there is no way to eradicate riba other than having a system that is not built on riba. A society that does not prioritize Salah is one whose educational system and lifestyle revolves around secular priorities. When a society legalizes fahisha, zina will be rampant. Without Khilafah, all of the above will be harder to accomplish. With that said, those who are calling for and working towards its establishment should ensure that they are engaged in rigorous spiritual tarbiya as was the case of the earlier sahaba before hijra, and ensure that they are changing what is within themselves so that Allah can bring about change for the ummah.
2 words come to my mind when I listen to this..' Limited Belief'.
The discussion begins with Mecca and Madina and those who betrayed Islam in the 1920's and implemented monarchies in Jazirat Al Arab. Keep in mind after establishing a Khilafah, how will the rest of the Ummah look at the leader if he over stays his Saudi Visa and forced out of the capital cities of Islam? We have to first have that uncomfortable conversation that many Shiekhs, Scholars, and Imams avoid because they're scared or are bought and sold... Sorry not sorry
Imam Muslim narrated from Abu Hazim who said:
I was with Abu Hurairah for five years and I heard him narrate from the Prophet (SAW) that he said: "The Prophets used to rule Bani Israel. Whenever a prophet died another prophet succeeded him, but there will be no prophets after me; instead there will be Khulafaa' (Khalifahs) and they will number many". They asked: what then do you order us? He said: "fulfil allegiance to them one after the other. Give them their dues. Verily Allah will ask them about what he entrusted them with".
This Hadeeth is a clear statement of the fact that the form of government in Islam, after the Prophet (SAW) is the Khilafah, and not an Islamic Republic, Islamic Socialist Republic or Islamic Imarah.
What? A khilafah is a tool, but not the End goal???
Is our brother ok?
Surah 8:73 As for the disbelievers, they are guardians of one another. And unless you ˹believers˺ act likewise, there will be great oppression and corruption in the land.
I'm pretty sure that among 1.8 billion people, we can come up with a good method to truly select a pious person as a leader, it isn't too difficult of a task
Yasir Qadhi is trying to reform Islam from within!
Not really
Exactly, but people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
One of the protections against trials in the grave is any beneficial knowledge about Islam and Allah that you shared with others in this world. This Ramadan, share your favorite hadith, or teach someone your favorite surah or post a spiritual reminder for others! And get Allah's blessings and protection in the hereafter! May Allah give you multiple folds of good deeds this month
WHY IS YQ SO OBSESSED AGAINST THE KHILAFAH, I WONDER!
Madkhali
Please at least be fare to him even if you disagree that is close to piety.
@@shoaibriz who is ?
He's from West, so they're counted as RANDkhalis. Those who knows, knows.
@@mdfahd24 you are randkhali too?
Indeed Imam is a Sheild behind whom you fight and you get protected. ( Musnad Ahmed).
We dont have our shelid from past 100 years and we know what is happening to us till date. Only Khilafah can unify us and its one of the main obligation which is been neglected. Scholars call Khilafah to be Umm ul Faraiz ( mother of all obligation). Dont fall into the trap of ignoring it.
Jazakallahu khayr Sheikh for the very practical approach. Others can enlighten us too. But simply spreading skunk water to foot solders of the Ummah is blameworthy.
Ist step of establishing Khilafa can be to promote peaceful coexistence, helping the needy and making habit of praying Tahajjud.
Aren't we doing that all these centuries now?
Engineer - give me a project.
You - Read A for Apple.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
What about next steps for establishing Khilafah, please give detailed roadmap because people are not gonna start until they understand the process and this is for every process.
So don't just say that only practicing some rituals are enough for being success in this world and the next world
“When you in power you have ultimate authority to do as you please” I couldn’t agree more my respected sheikh.
Today Muslims are just obsessed with khilafah, there is more to it than their obsession. we should all study history, shred our ignorance and learn more.
The same people calling for khilafah will eventually destroy it when it’s established.
Today we cannot even agree with each on minor religious differences and issues without calling for each other’s heads.
Our lack of organisation collectively and individually has led to our weakness. We are many in numbers yet can’t rock ant.
The sahabah were few yet their impact in grand scheme of things was immense. If our nabbiy ﷺ were to be alive today some of us will challenge his authority with our attitude that’s the reality of state of affairs.
We cannot change and remained the same. Allah will not change our situation until we change our ways.
The reason the regular muslim is struggling with their deen is because of the absence of the khilafah though... so how can a khilafah not be the top priority? I don't understand this.
how is the regular muslim struggling with their deen because of the lack of khilafah? Does the regular muslim not now how to pray or that it is a fard? What is keeping the regular muslim from fullfilling his obligations to Allah? The lack of a political leader? I don't understand your reasoning
Ibn Taymiyyah (rh.a.) said,
"Yajib an yo'rafa anna wilayata amr in-naasi min a'thami waajibaat id-Deen, Bal laa qiyaamu li-Deen illa bihaa".
"It is obligatory to know that the office in charge of commanding over the people (ie: the Khilafah post) is one of the greatest obligations of the Deen. In fact, their is no establishment of the Deen except by it....this is the opinion of the salaf, such as al-Fadl ibn 'Iyaad, Ahmed ibn Hanbal and others".
(Siyaasah Shariyyah - chapter: 'The obligation of adherence to the leadership'.)
❤ from Kerala south India
Yasir use to support same sex relations.
Yasir use to support secular politicians.
Yasir helped the Christian evangelists with his confused comments about the authenticity of the Qur'an.
Now this veiled opposition to the struggle for the Khilafah.
This is why Sheikh Yasir Qadhi is Sheikh ul Islam in my opinion, he brings about visionary concepts that would benefit the Ummah, may Allah bless him and his family, Ameen
We need to define a khilafah before we talk about it so people understand it
Exactly I also wanted to say the same thing
Yasir Qadhi is forgetting that the EU is collapsing. Countries want to leave, the UK already left. The way of Allah is best, there is no alternative.
Which way of Allahs you are talking about.
I think you missed the point of the lecture. He literally said don’t be like the hypocrites who criticized the ‘small’ or ‘unpopular’ efforts. He just is saying think creatively about the future of the ummah
Yes he did not understood the lection@@asham6024
The EU has no Islam, European countries are only connected for geopolitical reasons. Europeans are not united by brotherly bonds and their common goal is not unity but political domination of the world and the greatest possible profit. When it comes to the solution that Allah SWT gave us, the union of Muslim countries is exactly that.
I do get what he means about thinking out of the box and coming up with our own solutions. But the EU are not the best example and the US is not exactly friendly like Abyssinia. I agree with him in helping as little as possible but there are also other points I disagree with. There is more than the eyes can see.
Imaam al-Ghazali (rh.a.) when writing of the potential consequences of losing the Khilafah said,
"The judges will be suspeneded, the Wilayaat (provinces) will be nullified, ... the decrees of those in authority will not be executed and all the people will be on the verge of Haraam".
(al Iqtisaad fil Itiqaad page 240.)
Ok, I agree it would only work if the Khalifa was a righteous Muslim, so what is your answer? We replace Biden with a good leader? Coz that’s going to work 🙄
This is the most realistic talk I have heard in a while. The first problem we need to cure in this Ummah is illusion. We need to start living in the present instead of dwelling in the past. It's ironic that we want to talk about Khalifa while we are centuries behind in science, economics, technology, politics (actually every field you can imagine). We can't solve problems with emotions. Please wake up
Ibn Hazm said: “What indicates a person’s weak religion and fear of God, is that he seaks for an opinion that suits his desire.”
● {al-Ikham v. 5, p. 64}
“The Muslims only conquered the world and took control over it, by the justice of ‘Umar, the fiqh of Mu'adh, the hadith of Abu Hurayra, the zuhd (abandoning the dunya with piety) of Abu Dhar and the courage of Khalid bin Waleed رضي الله عنهم.
They did not conquer it by the signals of Ibn Sina nor by the sharpness of Ar-Razi. Nor by the optics of Ibn Al-Haytham and nor by the music of Al-Farabi."
- Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd فك الله اسره
Salaam to all, and Ramadan Kareem to all. I just wanted to say as a Shia, this imam may Allah protect him is one of the few Sunni imams I listened to on youtube. He is Great mashallah... May ALLAH Guide us all
Waleykumsalam salam.. Akhi you are Muslim and will always be my brother in Islam..what matters most is your deeds ..no Shia nor Sunni..just Muslims if we are to defend our families… we have been divided by maqadilis and the evil workers of the west… it’s time we stand fast - brother from Somalia …
Only ALLAH is Kareem!!!!
And Muslims live by t Qur'an and *Sunnah* !!!!
“As a Shia” Is that necessary?
@@Mzale You say we are just Muslims but then say maqadilis why you divide? Bida is what divides. TRue Muslims warn of bida!
@@Mzale
Many she'uh don't believe in Qur'an like Ali Komeini is that Islam? many left in lran. Quran 9 :100 says Follow Muhajirin and Ansar!
Innallillahi wa inna ilayhi rajiun.
According to him: Thieves should become righteous then he would talk about bringing the law and order.
1- it's Fard but don't think of doing it!
2- will you go to Jannah if there is Khilafa? Khilafa will insure to build a most pure and righteous society by commanding Maroof and stopping munkar. Today We are being pulled from every corner of kufr that we have very less chances to avoid haram. Riba, sexuality, and what not.
3- Previously Khilafa was corrupted. So what who wants corrupted Khilafa? We want Khilfa-e-Rashidah.. we have so many case studies to learn from...they couldn't save muslim in Andalusia hence today Khilafah cannot save Gaza! What a lame excuse.
4- People calling to Khilafa opposing others r like Munafiq? Wow! people who are calling to establish Allahs order are labelled n refered like munafiq did! He cannot get way with this for sure.
5- for him European union seems to be an ideal structure. While lot of contradicting points. " I am not opposing" but it's not required! I am not against it but it's not realistic.
Delusional and distracting, specially at the time when Ummah is trying to unite. And the call of unity was so loud and clear all around.
May Allah open our eyes to see the Haq.
Reality is bitter. Your right sheikh
So disappointed in Shaykh Yasir Qadi.
To extract the Huqm on a matter, a mujtahid must consult all the ayats and ahadith that relate to the issue and then derive the Huqm. Shaykh Yasir Qadi has not consulted Ayate on this subject nor any of the dozens of Ahadith (Bukhari, Muslim) on this subject despite being a hadith scholar.
He argued with the history of Andalusia that it split off from the Ottoman Caliphate and could therefore no longer rely on the caliph's help when it needed help. Since when is history a Dalil to derive a Huqm for a matter in the present?!? Our sources are Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijmaa as-Sahāba and Qiyās! And no historical events.
Shaykh Yasir Qadi does not talk about a single one of the dozens of hadiths in which the Prophet (saw) tells us about the Caliphate and its duty. Also, the scholars of all 4 major schools of law have always agreed that the Caliphate must exist and that it is one of the greatest duties. Some scholars have called it the mother of all duties on which many other duties depend (such as collecting Zakat, organizing Hajj, protecting Muslim life, securing borders,...)
What also really disappointed me is that Shaykh Yasir Qadi is looking for a solution to the problem in the West. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah did Allah command us to have nation states with their own leaders who should rule according to Kufr and work together for certain occasions (like Gaza)?!? When after the death of the Prophet (saw) the Ansār proposed 2 leaders, it was immediately rejected by the Ashāb (pl. Sahāba)! And Abu Bakr (r.a.) would be appointed sole leader.
I am very disappointed with Shaykh Yasir Qadi. How can he give an opinion on an issue without referring to the relevant ayat and ahadith and Ijmaa as-Sahaaba???
All in all very disappointed.
1. It's a fard which he agrees with
2. But it's doesn't hold great importance compared to other fard (here he misses the point of how it affects the other obligations)
3. He doesn't see the importance of how everyone can be effective in calling for the state as he doesn't share the same methodology as the Hizb (public opinion and nusra)
4. Establishing a masjid and madrassa is not greater than establishing a Khilafah. The Khilafah uses the states funds to set up these structures. At the present moment, our Islamic schools and mosques are monitored by the western state of what we say and do and ensure we follow their guidelines, such as promoting British values, or what an imam can and can not say having undercover prevent officers in the masjids
5. He shows we have a defeatest mindset by saying we can't establish a Khilafah. (You can't if you don't work for it)
6. You don't need a KHILAFAH to enter jannah and vise versa. Pointless comment. However working for Khilafah will earn you great reward and fulfil the duty of the fard and maybe you will be accountable for doing nothing at all? Having a Khilafah will help create an environment to be help people gain Jannah
7. He makes. It like a dream in the future, maybe not in our life time and to just believe in the concept but there is nothing you can do about it, worry about tangible acts... Again this is because he doesn't value it's importance, defeatest mindset and no methodology.
8. Not sure about the Abasiniya part.
9. Muslim living in the western land to accept status quo? So allow the west to bomb, kill, rape, steal wealth from Muslim lands and accept it? No demos for Gaza? But then he will say get involve with the political elections and use their method to choose better leaders that benefit Muslims when in reality neither party ever benefits Muslims. Abasinyya wasn't at war with the Muslims. So again a different reality. Maybe apply that concept in Brazil and stay out of the political mess.
10. To my understanding go to the west for money, education and dawah is a temporary thing, not permanent?
11. Politics corrupts the soul. Yes if done wrongly and if done rightly it is amazing.
12. People seeking power and causing bloodshed happens. People want to get in power to be the one that serves well because they think they can do a better job. This is normal and happens in plenty of circumstances, especially in businesses.
13. Gaza will have a chance because it requires military intervention and only a righteous leader will do this. It's evident right now that no one is willing to do anything about it
14. If we had a Khilafah, we will be in a better situation than we are in now. Life under the khilafah even in its bad days is better than life without the Khilafah.
15. Salahuddeen didnt have support from Khilafah....
16. You have armchair critics who do nothing and then you have those who don't criticize but remind you the correct way moving forward. That's called positive criticism.
17. This idea that something is better than nothing can also be problematic. Can't simply do anything.
18. Agree, those who work for Khilafah do there thing and those who want to do other things do there thing, however if that other thing is wrong, it should be taken to account.
19. No one is mocking those who do good deeds. Even if it ain't going to do anything, a good deed is a good deed.
20. Yes most likely a Khilafah will have blood and a revolution. I can't see any way.
21. Comparing EU and Unifying the Muslims states... Our leaders are put in place and controlled by the West. This is a. Lot of political nativity here.
22. He calls for Muslim unity whilst accept the British made borders hoping that we can have unity by having all these leaders accepting the nationalistic states we have today. That ain't a reality nor should we want that.
Yeah tell me, what are you doing for the ummah? Very curious to hear
The corruption hides behind big titles like Dr. So when the Dr. speaks, everyone must agree because the speaker is the Dr. But in reality, those who see the implementation of the shari'ah of Islam equal to the implementation of any other ruling system. Those are the ones who Allah meant in the verse:
{الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ وَجَعَلَ الظُّلُمَاتِ وَالنُّورَ ۖ ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بِرَبِّهِمْ يَعدِلُون}
[All] praise is [due] to Allah, who created the heavens and the earth and made the darkness and the light. Then those who disbelieve equate [others] with their lord. 1 surat Al An'am.
May Allah protect us.🤲😔
As if the similar problems are not happening and similar type of atrocities are not being committed today by the secular powers! We have justice - which is Islam, and its establishment is Khilafah. If some past caliphs or sultans from a very long 1300 history commit some crimes and bad deeds, should we say that Khilafah is not good, or Islam is not good due to those misappropriations. No! Islamic system can bring justice and peace, if applied correctly, so the term - Khilafah Rashidah - succession of the prophet (SAW) righteously, best possible solution. But people are being diverted by tricksters, when you use certain parts of the history of long 1300 years and misuse it, people get very wrong understanding, which in this case YQ got and had been propagating, the same old orientalist views, nothing new.
Sheikh, thank you for making it clear that if the mahdi appears we dont have to join him, and if a Khalifa appears and aims for palestine we dont have to join his army. I was losing sleep over the possibly inconvenience involved but now can sleep easy.
This is the logical conclusion after pondering this talk. Itaqillah brother Yasir.
Allahu Akbar ☝🏽 🤲🏽 🇵🇸 ✨️
May Allah guide yasir qadhi
As if he is deviant,that is his opinion,if you have yours let it be known.
May Allah guide you and all of us
Get out of this mindset. I was like this for years it literally destroyed me
Our so called scholars need more guidance than us. Isn't that sign of end of times.
@sadofaraji5999 opinions are for normal people. When you're a scholar you don't give your opinions. He's dividing Ummah
MaashaAllah, Subhaanallah, Alhamdhulillah, ALLAHU AKBAR.
It is a need of hour! Estabilsh economic and security Khilafah immediately
how?
Ok, tell us your plan, I am listening.
@@Muhammet-Kuruoglu I am not an expert. But I had wished if we had our own brands from clothing, food, groceries to automobiles. Simple policy of buying things from Muslims.
@@Drfau1710 you can already buy from muslims only in most non muslim countrys. Nothing is stopping you. Khilafah is not going to make you buy anything differently
@@Muhammet-Kuruoglu years of colonisation has created western culture as the dominant culture. Most of the world including muslims are trying to imitate westerner in what they eat or what they wear. We need to recolonise their minds.
Dr. Qadhi's suggestions are very pragmatic and certainly an interim solution until Allah establishes the Khilafa on Earth (because only the might of Allah can make it happen). His approach was actually adopted by the Indian Muslim sultans against the Hindu oppressor Kings, but the last such confrontation broke their backs making it easy for the British to gain a foothold in India :)