Meshing STL Using snappyHexMesh in OpenFOAM

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
  • Chapters:
    00:00 Intro
    01:40 Binary to ASCII Stl
    07:50 Scale Down Stl
    10:20 BlockMesh
    21:10 snappyHexMesh
    31:40 decomposePar & parallel processing
    34:30 Refinement of Mesh
    38:20 Final Mesh
    40:30 BCs
    Geometry File: grabcad.com/library/m10-417-a...
    Sorry for the poor audio. Will fix it in future videos.

Комментарии • 24

  • @shahriarhossain53
    @shahriarhossain53 14 дней назад +1

    very good and well explained video. learn a lots of things. keep posting similar videos on OpenFOAM.

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  14 дней назад

      Means a lot. thankyou so much. Share and support

  • @disinlungkamei2869
    @disinlungkamei2869 22 часа назад +1

    Thanks you so much sir

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  6 часов назад +1

      Most welcome. Thanks for your support

  • @whotfisryan4431
    @whotfisryan4431 2 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for the video..Sir.!

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  2 месяца назад

      Welcome. please subscribe and support.

  • @imonghosh7286
    @imonghosh7286 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you very much sir, well and enough explained video like always.

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  2 месяца назад +1

      Thankyou soo much.
      Do support by subscribing and sharing 😊

    • @imonghosh7286
      @imonghosh7286 2 месяца назад +1

      ​@@Codeynamics Today I followed the tutorial and succesfully did the meshing. I am also thinking to run the case considering a random velocity of fluid. I must again thank you for making everything as clear as possible.
      I was wondering if you can make a tutorial meshing the same file in "cfMesh" .
      Also, can you make any tutorial on meshing and case setting a wind turbine!

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  2 месяца назад +1

      Sure will try to make them.

  • @victorlorenzo3959
    @victorlorenzo3959 20 дней назад +1

    Thanks for your video, I change all the motorbike name for the goodone and launch simplefoam but at the time=6 i have a error with #1 to #12 line, do you know what's the cause?

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  20 дней назад

      Thanks for commenting. Please mail the zipped case file to codeynamics@gmail.com we will get back to you asap

    • @victorlorenzo3959
      @victorlorenzo3959 20 дней назад

      @@Codeynamics thanks a lot, have a great day

  • @Tars-20
    @Tars-20 Месяц назад +1

    Hey this is a great video and thank you for that.
    Would be nice if you can also run the sim and make a video of it, PLEASE!!!

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  Месяц назад

      I will try for sure!

    • @Tars-20
      @Tars-20 Месяц назад

      @@Codeynamics Thanks!!!!

  • @itanison9581
    @itanison9581 2 месяца назад +1

    thanks really helpful.Just a quick question did you run the silulation and if so which command did you use?

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  2 месяца назад

      Thankyou.
      I did not run the simulation. If you had to run for that case specifically, you should be using simpleFoam command.
      It depends on the solver.
      Please do subscribe and support for more useful videos.

    • @itanison9581
      @itanison9581 2 месяца назад

      @@Codeynamics hello again, i'm having a problem with the snappyhexmesh.When i run it i am usually having blocks meshed around the airplane instead of the geometry being meshed completly.So the resulting mesh is just a bunch of blocks surrounding the aircraft what can be causing this error?I just used the snappyhexmesh command without the mpirun because for some reason it told me that this command doesn't exist could this be the reason?

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  2 месяца назад

      The reason is that in the snappyHexMeshDict, under snapControls function, see the 6th and the 7th parameters. set the implicitFeatureSnap to false and set explicitFeatureSnap to true. This should make your problem solved.
      The behavior with just snappyHexMesh will be exactly the same as doing it with decomposed case. It is only a matter of time that differs for both the process. mpirun case is faster due to parallel processing.
      I hope this is clear.

  • @jayendrarajanala7047
    @jayendrarajanala7047 Месяц назад +1

    Need a help about the surfacefeatureExtract command its not working for me?

    • @Codeynamics
      @Codeynamics  Месяц назад

      Please write a detailed email about the error along with screenshots to codeynamics@gmail.com. Our engineers will reply soon.