Ph.D Wesly Cecil’s humorous lecturing style is fantastic that attracts the audience attention. At the same time, the way how he cohesively exhibits his serious understanding over any philosophers is unbelievable.
One of the most comprehensive and compelling summaries of a person's life in philosophical work I have had the pleasure of listening to. Thank you for sharing.
What a relief that Simone de Beauvior was confident and had the will and the guts to write and to live the life she proposed in her work. What a relief that so many were inspired to seize the courage to do so as well. What a relief that there are professors out there who recite her work in a positive light to empower their students to discuss freedom rather than constant repression. As for the laughter in class, consider the fact that the professor had found a way to address the study of philosophy to a student body in a kind of communicative engagement that they needed to retain this study. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the method.
de Beauvoir was a disgusting pervert who was fired for having sex with her pupils, groomed and procured girls for Sartre and signed a petition to legalise paedophilia in France in 1977 (among others including Sartre and the darlings of post-modernism Foucault and Derrida). She also abandoned Jewish friends during the Nazi occupation and collaborated with the Nazis working for a Nazi mouthpiece radio station. Add to that her support for Stalin and the murderous regime in the USSR and I seriously wonder what 'relief' is there in reciting her work?
I agree. I think The Indendepent Woman should be read by all girls by the age of 16. I have not yet read The Second Sex. Women are economic beings. I hate to say when I realized that we shouldkeep our own economies
@@MegaGraceiscool Disprove a single thing I have said. Prove she was a woman of principle in her actions rather than the disgusting woman she really was. And I you shouldn't use phrases like virtue signalling or ad hominems when you clearly don't know what they mean. It makes you look an absolute fool.
Professor Cecil, this one placed chills in my hair on my arms as I listened to you about Simone de Beauvoir. What an extraordinary woman and a woman I get. Although, I must read these writings she wrote. Again, I love your humor as you teach. Furthermore, you make philosophy a joy. With the deepest appreciation and respect for your intelligence.
Her idea that legal rights are necessity but not sufficient for freedom is quite interesting. She had women in mind. But Blacks, workers and other oppressed human groups have discovered after winning certain legal rights that this was important but not enough to win them full freedom. Perhaps this is the case with every excluded or proscribed human group.
She sounds a lot like Stirner to be honest. In regards her proposition to reject narratives because they exist outside of the individual and cannot be made ones own. While she attacked certain subject matter differently than Stirner, the two have pretty inspiring works in regards to individualistic philosophy and ethics.
Riveting, easy to understand humorous and fact laden talk even for the lay non-philosopher on de Beauvoir's approach to life and her concepts of true freedom. It has current application for our approach to life today with its emphasis on one's individual effort needed to break with conformity in order to achieve her (your) goals. A must listen to lecture!!
Female economic liberation is perhaps better associated with animal domestication and cottage industrys. For example, women who owned chickens and sold eggs were able to draw income and from a cottage, use those resources to knit and produce goods they owned completely. Production at this level was of course only possible when the rent was not too high. Unfortunately this lecturer is romancing industrial revolution which broke cottage industries, and denied many highly skilled female producers their first true income. The macro historical narrative of agriculture as backward and industry as modernizing skips important issues of landownership and self-sustainable economic issues that were disrupted by colonialization and monopolization of the modes of production.
This lecture was absolutely hilarious, I loved it in every respect! Are you familiar with Larry David's "Curb"? Sometimes you remind me of him. Loving all your videos, please keep it up! Some of the greatest content of RUclips.
Well, SdB was really great about her thoughts on the liberation of = fairness for women. But, what she said about China was just stupid or blind. What about the thousands of political murders and prison camps? What about the devastation of historical heritage? What about the extremely stupid industrialization attempts that led to 30 million deaths of famine?
the fastest growing homeless demographic in US right now are older women of all backgrounds but primarily brown/black BUT women who already served humanity, trusting that we would not end up homeless. we can't actually hang out in cafes and chart our own economic.futures until freedom from those.who own and control the means of production shift consciousness and values.
Read my blog on Simone de Beauvoir which commemorates the 30th anniversary of her passing: abromley91.wordpress.com/2016/04/05/simone-de-beauvoir-conformism-wasnt-her-thing-but-freedom-was/
Yah, it's either history or her story, ☯️ but you have to believe your own story 😄🎭 before you can believe anyone else's 🤥 story🤺 Direct Experience is The Now🧘
Yeah, people have a choice to choose, even if they choose to not to choose what the communists say have really been chosen for them, and that they should have chosen the alternative choice to really prove that they have a choice after all. Again, wonderful humor and erudition. As well, you have the voice and manner of a young Jimmy Stewart!
But she was unwilling to face one fact about the human condition: that humans are not free and that she was working with a conception of the human subject inherited from the conception of the human soul in Christianity. She bought into that particular story, despite her atheism, and that's where her conception of freedom comes from. But there is no soul, there is no pure human subject that is "just human and not a woman, a man, an African-American, a member of the bourgeoisie", etc, and there is no such thing as human freedom. Those are myths.
Wes Cecil is obviously a very engaging and entertaining lecturer and clearly gets energy from the audience. But, I find it a bit cringeworthy how some people laugh a little too loudly at even the most marginal of Cecil's jokes. These students undoubtedly are sitting in the front row and attend every lecture. I do not condemn or criticize any student for being enthusiastic learners, particularly adult students in the United States, where one can be forgiven for thinking mental enrichment has fallen woefully behind the rest of the world. And I certainly don't begrudge Cecil for hamming it up a little. Heck, I do it too if it helps keep my students engaged with the material. But there's just something about sycophants that sucks a little joy out of a classroom. I know I'm nitpicking here. I just can't help it. Please take the guffawing down a notch. it's not all about you. I'm sure Dr.Cecil knows you enjoy his class - he doesn't need a chorus of braying donkeys to affirm that he is charming.
This is a fun and interesting lecture but it becomes almost intolerably dishonest when he ridicules gay people who want to get married, claiming that they are only trying to fit into cultural stereotypes that they mindlessly accept. He should know that there are all sorts of legal issues that are relevant to a relationship and why shouldn't they seek religious acceptance as well if they are into that? Then he endorses de Beauvoir's praise for the Chinese Communist regime -- even after the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square. He claims that the party only does what the people want and when they don't the people revolt and the party self-corrects. If students Tiananmen Square happened today, he says, "the people" would go down there and beat the hell out of them. Why fight for democracy when Big Brother takes such good care of you? And all the while he is telling us that de Beauvoir was only concerned about freedom.
Her humanizing, existential quest for freedom sounds a lot like the theist, who is always seeking the sacred or God despite his or her lack of death. In other words, their version of the religious life is the quest.
! WAS READ SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR IN 1970, I ADMIRED HER, BUT NOT FOR THE BOOK SECOND SEX BECAUSE I WAS AND STILL TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH HER, WITH ALL SHE WROTE IN THAT BOOK. RIGHT MAN IN THE RIGHT MOMENT ALWAYS HAPPENS. AND HAPPENS WITH SIMONE. WHY? SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS THERE, BEFORE AND AFTER SECOND WORLD WAR, SHE WAS RIGHT AT THAT TIME, THAT EXPLAINS WHY SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS "EXTRAORDINARY " IN HER BOOK THE SECOND SEX. SURREALISM, ETC ETC NOW IS WRONG. SINCE THE BEGINNING DNA AND HORMONES DETERMINE GIRLS, AND BOYS , NO SOCIETY.
SHE WAS AN EXTRAORDINAIRE WRITER, SHE SIMPLE WANTED TO SAY WITH EXTREAMLY DETAILS EVERY THING, ALL !!! AND IT WAS GREAT, AND NOW THANK YOU MISS SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR
Video is about a decade old... Maybe now we are beginning to think more about existential philosophy... we sure could use it as a basic answer for a lot of questions... That people still don't ask actually. So yeah, no existentialism; just barbarians eating turds.
Where was this lecture? The comedy club? Or was he lecturing to hyenas? He gets more laughs than Dane Cook. Completely subverts the entire video for me. I was looking for something intellectual, but it turns into some kind of weird chuckle fest. Good to know that philosophy sucks at other colleges as much as it does at mine.
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
Ph.D Wesly Cecil’s humorous lecturing style is fantastic that attracts the audience attention. At the same time, the way how he cohesively exhibits his serious understanding over any philosophers is unbelievable.
One of the most comprehensive and compelling summaries of a person's life in philosophical work I have had the pleasure of listening to. Thank you for sharing.
The whole thing be summed up in a single sentence though. Woman should have rights... not really any substance at all.
@@Laocoon283did you skip the entire existentialism part? And the moral dilemma that it brought?
What a relief that Simone de Beauvior was confident and had the will and the guts to write and to live the life she proposed in her work. What a relief that so many were inspired to seize the courage to do so as well. What a relief that there are professors out there who recite her work in a positive light to empower their students to discuss freedom rather than constant repression. As for the laughter in class, consider the fact that the professor had found a way to address the study of philosophy to a student body in a kind of communicative engagement that they needed to retain this study. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the method.
de Beauvoir was a disgusting pervert who was fired for having sex with her pupils, groomed and procured girls for Sartre and signed a petition to legalise paedophilia in France in 1977 (among others including Sartre and the darlings of post-modernism Foucault and Derrida). She also abandoned Jewish friends during the Nazi occupation and collaborated with the Nazis working for a Nazi mouthpiece radio station. Add to that her support for Stalin and the murderous regime in the USSR and I seriously wonder what 'relief' is there in reciting her work?
I agree. I think The Indendepent Woman should be read by all girls by the age of 16. I have not yet read The Second Sex. Women are economic beings. I hate to say when I realized that we shouldkeep our own economies
@@_Sakidora_ Cut it out with the virtue signaling. You can look at her arguments for women without throwing ad hominems.
@@_Sakidora_ I like French writers and French philosophers but I hate this de beauvoir with passion. Sorry. I even can't stomach this lecture
@@MegaGraceiscool Disprove a single thing I have said. Prove she was a woman of principle in her actions rather than the disgusting woman she really was.
And I you shouldn't use phrases like virtue signalling or ad hominems when you clearly don't know what they mean. It makes you look an absolute fool.
Professor Cecil, this one placed chills in my hair on my arms as I listened to you about Simone de Beauvoir.
What an extraordinary woman and a woman I get. Although, I must read these writings she wrote.
Again, I love your humor as you teach.
Furthermore, you make philosophy a joy.
With the deepest appreciation and respect for your intelligence.
Philosophy teaching is alive and kicking! :-) It was an immense pleasure! Looking forward to the other lectures! Thankyou!
@Bruno56 heey??
She was an incredible writer and her ideas helped to change how society sees women
Her idea that legal rights are necessity but not sufficient for freedom is quite interesting. She had women in mind. But Blacks, workers and other oppressed human groups have discovered after winning certain legal rights that this was important but not enough to win them full freedom. Perhaps this is the case with every excluded or proscribed human group.
She sounds a lot like Stirner to be honest. In regards her proposition to reject narratives because they exist outside of the individual and cannot be made ones own. While she attacked certain subject matter differently than Stirner, the two have pretty inspiring works in regards to individualistic philosophy and ethics.
Many thanks for this gift. 💐
lectures don't usually give me the chills. beyond excellent
This is an exceptional lecture! So lively! Simon is such an inspiration. Thank you for your work, dear Wes!
Riveting, easy to understand humorous and fact laden talk even for the lay non-philosopher on de Beauvoir's approach to life and her concepts of true freedom. It has current application for our approach to life today with its emphasis on one's individual effort needed to break with conformity in order to achieve her (your) goals. A must listen to lecture!!
A great lecture, which demonstrates her brilliance and originality in a completely sympathetic and accurate way. A pleasure to listen to it.
Wow great talk and magnificent ideas. I am particularly inspired by de Beauvoir's take on (unconventional) relationships.
These talks are exceptional. Many many thanks.
Wow! A superb lecture by a very entertaining and engaging lecturer!
Wes Cecil - Fantastic introduction to Simone De Beauvoir and the parameters of her philosophy. Lucid, political and humorous - very stimulating 👍
"Living is: not knowing if everything is going to work out."
Thanks, having to write a long-ass essay in French, thanks for your informative way of making this process less painful!
Profoundly moving discussion. Thanks Prof. Cecil. Good stuff. 😊🎒♥️
The first exemple! That was great.
Thank you for this lecture. It was a pleasure to listen to it.
Thank you! Entertaining and informative, that's how a lecture should be!
Helped me a lot to prepare an own presentation for a class about sexism.
Female economic liberation is perhaps better associated with animal domestication and cottage industrys. For example, women who owned chickens and sold eggs were able to draw income and from a cottage, use those resources to knit and produce goods they owned completely. Production at this level was of course only possible when the rent was not too high. Unfortunately this lecturer is romancing industrial revolution which broke cottage industries, and denied many highly skilled female producers their first true income. The macro historical narrative of agriculture as backward and industry as modernizing skips important issues of landownership and self-sustainable economic issues that were disrupted by colonialization and monopolization of the modes of production.
this was so good
Amazing and true. THANK YOU!
I have found the youtube channel for me ... finally
EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT
A prolific thinker, in her own time as well as in ours.
This lecture was absolutely hilarious, I loved it in every respect! Are you familiar with Larry David's "Curb"? Sometimes you remind me of him.
Loving all your videos, please keep it up! Some of the greatest content of RUclips.
Thank you.
ideas well expressed I havnt read her literature I think helpful regardless as one may move through most of these phases in life in a moder city
Well, SdB was really great about her thoughts on the liberation of = fairness for women. But, what she said about China was just stupid or blind. What about the thousands of political murders and prison camps? What about the devastation of historical heritage? What about the extremely stupid industrialization attempts that led to 30 million deaths of famine?
Great subject and presenter !
the fastest growing homeless demographic in US right now are older women of all backgrounds but primarily brown/black BUT women who already served humanity, trusting that we would not end up homeless. we can't actually hang out in cafes and chart our own economic.futures until freedom from those.who own and control the means of production shift consciousness and values.
thank you so much for posting these lectures
Brilliant! I am new to your channel. Thank you.
Read my blog on Simone de Beauvoir which commemorates the 30th anniversary of her passing: abromley91.wordpress.com/2016/04/05/simone-de-beauvoir-conformism-wasnt-her-thing-but-freedom-was/
Great lecture. Inspiring
Professor Cecil!! I love that movie TIN CUP!!! ;)
Yah, it's either history or her story, ☯️ but you have to believe your own story 😄🎭 before you can believe anyone else's 🤥 story🤺 Direct Experience is The Now🧘
The mother and founder of all things me and my happiness I-generation and congratulations to all her followers
16:34 - middle class women didn't want to give up their easy lives to take on work
Dowunload Wise Universal from Play Store, it`s great
The mother and queen of "Me Too".
good lecture big help
Ruined by adverts intervening.
do Albert Camus please
Has anyone done a study of attitudes towards feminism of different classes of women or (at least in America) different racial groups of women?
33:00
Didn't 2 women score ahead of Sartre
What you edit is Aristophanes
Yeah, people have a choice to choose, even if they choose to not to choose what the communists say have really been chosen for them, and that they should have chosen the alternative choice to really prove that they have a choice after all. Again, wonderful humor and erudition. As well, you have the voice and manner of a young Jimmy Stewart!
I suddenly find a lot of similarities btwn her and Max Stirner, anyone else?
yes, the cultural conventions she talkes about could easily be replaced by Stirners spooks
Vive la Reine!
But she was unwilling to face one fact about the human condition: that humans are not free and that she was working with a conception of the human subject inherited from the conception of the human soul in Christianity. She bought into that particular story, despite her atheism, and that's where her conception of freedom comes from. But there is no soul, there is no pure human subject that is "just human and not a woman, a man, an African-American, a member of the bourgeoisie", etc, and there is no such thing as human freedom. Those are myths.
Wes Cecil is obviously a very engaging and entertaining lecturer and clearly gets energy from the audience. But, I find it a bit cringeworthy how some people laugh a little too loudly at even the most marginal of Cecil's jokes. These students undoubtedly are sitting in the front row and attend every lecture. I do not condemn or criticize any student for being enthusiastic learners, particularly adult students in the United States, where one can be forgiven for thinking mental enrichment has fallen woefully behind the rest of the world. And I certainly don't begrudge Cecil for hamming it up a little. Heck, I do it too if it helps keep my students engaged with the material. But there's just something about sycophants that sucks a little joy out of a classroom. I know I'm nitpicking here. I just can't help it. Please take the guffawing down a notch. it's not all about you. I'm sure Dr.Cecil knows you enjoy his class - he doesn't need a chorus of braying donkeys to affirm that he is charming.
The Second Sex changed my life. It's like the bible, but true and for women.
5:35 - tried to get married to a rich man and leech off him - it fell through
Did Beauvoir ever comment on asexual people?
I hate an audience that doesn't know when to laugh or not.
***** Yes.
sybo59 laugh or cry?
"Who's the doctor?" Pretty freakin' obvious - if the father is dead, she has to be his mother.
19:38 - pretends cinderella fantasy was about children
You dont need bread, eat cake.
Ruined by adverts intervening every couple of minutes. VERY ANNOYING. I eventually switched off.
This is a fun and interesting lecture but it becomes almost intolerably dishonest when he ridicules gay people who want to get married, claiming that they are only trying to fit into cultural stereotypes that they mindlessly accept. He should know that there are all sorts of legal issues that are relevant to a relationship and why shouldn't they seek religious acceptance as well if they are into that?
Then he endorses de Beauvoir's praise for the Chinese Communist regime -- even after the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square. He claims that the party only does what the people want and when they don't the people revolt and the party self-corrects. If students Tiananmen Square happened today, he says, "the people" would go down there and beat the hell out of them.
Why fight for democracy when Big Brother takes such good care of you? And all the while he is telling us that de Beauvoir was only concerned about freedom.
He clearly edited out the plethora of rape scenes in the classics lol. Dont how you didnt pick up on that.
Her humanizing, existential quest for freedom sounds a lot like the theist, who is always seeking the sacred or God despite his or her lack of death. In other words, their version of the religious life is the quest.
! WAS READ SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR IN 1970, I ADMIRED HER, BUT NOT FOR THE BOOK SECOND SEX
BECAUSE I WAS AND STILL TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH HER, WITH ALL SHE WROTE IN THAT BOOK.
RIGHT MAN IN THE RIGHT MOMENT ALWAYS HAPPENS. AND HAPPENS WITH SIMONE. WHY?
SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS THERE, BEFORE AND AFTER SECOND WORLD WAR, SHE WAS RIGHT AT THAT TIME,
THAT EXPLAINS WHY SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS "EXTRAORDINARY " IN HER BOOK THE SECOND SEX. SURREALISM, ETC ETC
NOW IS WRONG.
SINCE THE BEGINNING DNA AND HORMONES DETERMINE GIRLS, AND BOYS , NO SOCIETY.
SHE WAS AN EXTRAORDINAIRE WRITER, SHE SIMPLE WANTED TO SAY WITH EXTREAMLY DETAILS EVERY THING, ALL !!! AND IT WAS GREAT, AND NOW
THANK YOU MISS SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR
+oblong lol ok
no one had articulated these ideas before because they are a 100% nonsensical
Max Steiner but a Woman
Not keen on the unearned laughter.
Video is about a decade old... Maybe now we are beginning to think more about existential philosophy... we sure could use it as a basic answer for a lot of questions... That people still don't ask actually. So yeah, no existentialism; just barbarians eating turds.
Where was this lecture? The comedy club? Or was he lecturing to hyenas? He gets more laughs than Dane Cook. Completely subverts the entire video for me. I was looking for something intellectual, but it turns into some kind of weird chuckle fest. Good to know that philosophy sucks at other colleges as much as it does at mine.
What a pity this video is very poorly organized.
why are these ppl laughing? they are oblivious to the actual words and ideas he's relating.
Comedy hour, worthless, learn nothing.
Thank you.