Sir In the example without sensitivity list, won't the first value of 'a' is 0 for 5ns, and then 1 .Because 'a' was initially 0 and it has to wait 5ns for its value to change.
Are you a professor? Or are you just doing your best impersonation of a pompous college professor? The constant pondering and sucking air through your teeth after posing a question, took me to a bad place in my college career. And that's no offense to you but just a word of constructive criticism as to how these video's might be perceived.
Sorry to hear that you had pompous professors. The "pondering" is because my brain is slow to generate words and get them out of my mouth. It's something I've worked on, but I've never talked as fluidly as some folks, and probably never will. These videos were created in real-time for the pandemic version of the course, so I was using the equipment I had on hand and had essentially no time for editing. I'll definitely keep the mouth noises in mind and invest in some better equipment for videos I create in the future -- thanks for bringing that to my attention. (PS - you come across as pretty arrogant yourself.)
@@botsnlinux That was such a delightful response how can I be mad at it. Plus the gut punch/exclamation point at the end about being arrogant was brilliant.😂 I'm still laughing about it. I am never mad at a little constructive criticism so I'll try to take the arrogant undertone out of my messages. But good job on the video, other than the few critiques that I offered.
Thank you omg
YES. THANK YOU
Sir In the example without sensitivity list, won't the first value of 'a' is 0 for 5ns, and then 1 .Because 'a' was initially 0 and it has to wait 5ns for its value to change.
From what I understand, signals are updated at the beginning of wait not at the end. So at the start of the wait at 0ns 'a' will be updated to 1
For creating a clock by process, you should have inserted one line of code after wait For 5 ns :
signal a : std_logic := '0'
process
begin
a
The line a
@@botsnlinux i had a similar doubt, thanks for explaining!
thank you!
Awesome, but what about variables within a process, we know that signals change when a process ends, how do variables interacts within a process?
❤
lip smacking is very distracting
Glad I'm not the only one
Are you a professor? Or are you just doing your best impersonation of a pompous college professor? The constant pondering and sucking air through your teeth after posing a question, took me to a bad place in my college career. And that's no offense to you but just a word of constructive criticism as to how these video's might be perceived.
Sorry to hear that you had pompous professors. The "pondering" is because my brain is slow to generate words and get them out of my mouth. It's something I've worked on, but I've never talked as fluidly as some folks, and probably never will. These videos were created in real-time for the pandemic version of the course, so I was using the equipment I had on hand and had essentially no time for editing. I'll definitely keep the mouth noises in mind and invest in some better equipment for videos I create in the future -- thanks for bringing that to my attention. (PS - you come across as pretty arrogant yourself.)
@@botsnlinux That was such a delightful response how can I be mad at it. Plus the gut punch/exclamation point at the end about being arrogant was brilliant.😂 I'm still laughing about it. I am never mad at a little constructive criticism so I'll try to take the arrogant undertone out of my messages. But good job on the video, other than the few critiques that I offered.
@@botsnlinux dont mind about this dudes comment. I didnt even notice it. You explain very well. The dude is just a dickhead. Thanks for the video!