@@Emir_969 Imam Ahmad Ibne Hanbal (R)'s Sons book has many Problems 1) It has Incomplete Sanad So it's authenticity is in Question 2) It's filled with Daeef Narrations 3) It's filled with Israeli Reports 4) It has mass Takfeered people and even Accused Abu Hanifa(R) of Kufr in this book
Can you explain this please. I didn't understand properly. Did his students quote his aqeedah or their own aqeedah and just attributed to Imam Ahmad r.a. even though it wasn't from him? Jazakumullahu khairan
The latter allegedly. Some books attributed to Imam Ahmad were actually written by some of his students and they added in strange statements that Imam Ahmad didn't himself believe in.
@@thehanbalimadhab531Off the top of my head the book "Radd ala al Jahmiyyah". There's a timestamp at 22:20 where the topic is touched upon by Shiekh Yusuf. Hope that helps. ruclips.net/video/mMWVZft1r2M/видео.html
@@Makachev01 alazhar is an ashari.so we can say, he studied hanbali figh in an ashari school. By they way non muslim can study hanbali figh in Cambridge university.
@@Mohammed-nn3ts So? What’s wrong with Ash’aris? I’m sure you don’t even know the history of the 3 creeds and the development. You ignorant young youtuber, why are you on his youtube page then? Get lost and study!
BarakAllahu Fīkum 🌹
The fear in his eyes to tell the truth 😂
All Of Them had the same Creed, check "The Book Of Sunna" By Abdullah Ibn Ahmed Ibn Hanbal & "The Book Of Sunna" by Harb Al Karmani.
@@nourimgesicht it's true.
@@nourimgesicht
Then imam Ahmed is a mojasim because in these books he mostly cites what his father said according to your Logic.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
@@nourimgesicht according to Who? Is he a Mujjasim. You?
@@Emir_969 Imam Ahmad Ibne Hanbal (R)'s Sons book has many Problems
1) It has Incomplete Sanad
So it's authenticity is in Question
2) It's filled with Daeef Narrations
3) It's filled with Israeli Reports
4) It has mass Takfeered people and even Accused Abu Hanifa(R) of Kufr in this book
@@sadatnafis2032 exactly, there is so many fabricated narrations that even a lot of salafis won’t agree
Can you explain this please. I didn't understand properly. Did his students quote his aqeedah or their own aqeedah and just attributed to Imam Ahmad r.a. even though it wasn't from him?
Jazakumullahu khairan
The latter allegedly. Some books attributed to Imam Ahmad were actually written by some of his students and they added in strange statements that Imam Ahmad didn't himself believe in.
@@hasaankhan1048 And what books are these?
@@thehanbalimadhab531Off the top of my head the book "Radd ala al Jahmiyyah". There's a timestamp at 22:20 where the topic is touched upon by Shiekh Yusuf. Hope that helps. ruclips.net/video/mMWVZft1r2M/видео.html
@@anokata9929 mate. You calling someone "sufi ashari" says a lot about you. May Allah guide you and make your heart softer.
@@anokata9929 Shaykh Yusuf is a proper sunni hanbali like it or not
Not real Hanbalis
Becareful, this is not a true hanbali.
he ain't no wahhabi kafir, he's a true hanbali.
@@Ryan-lf6ds it is between you and Allah.
@@Mohammed-nn3tshe has a ijaza from al-Azhar man, who are u to say this.
@@Makachev01 alazhar is an ashari.so we can say, he studied hanbali figh in an ashari school. By they way non muslim can study hanbali figh in Cambridge university.
@@Mohammed-nn3ts So? What’s wrong with Ash’aris? I’m sure you don’t even know the history of the 3 creeds and the development. You ignorant young youtuber, why are you on his youtube page then? Get lost and study!