It's great to see you, Nick. It's been a while. I don't buy Davidoff much, but I've never had a bad one. I don't usually smoke Connecticuts, but the Grand Cru is smooth at buttery. On the other end of the spectrum, you can't go wrong with the Late Hour.
All three cigars you mentioned have a lot of similar tobacco for the wrapper, binder, and filler. I'd say the main difference in these would be how long they've been aged honestly. They're too similar to pinpoint differences by tobacco. But how they were aged and the construction plays a big part in it.
It's great to see you, Nick. It's been a while. I don't buy Davidoff much, but I've never had a bad one. I don't usually smoke Connecticuts, but the Grand Cru is smooth at buttery. On the other end of the spectrum, you can't go wrong with the Late Hour.
Very nice job of explaining the Davidoff lines! They are all pretty darn good!
Thank you kindly!
Great roundup! Thanks.
Glad you liked it!
What would you say is the main difference between Signature, Anniversario, and Cru?
All three cigars you mentioned have a lot of similar tobacco for the wrapper, binder, and filler. I'd say the main difference in these would be how long they've been aged honestly. They're too similar to pinpoint differences by tobacco. But how they were aged and the construction plays a big part in it.