Mankind is stupid .why would they invent something that would destroy them ? Like I the mouse that outsmart the 🐈. That cat is only gonna wait . Because that mice will get hungry .
The ULTIMATE Super-Intelligence System 'by Definition' is one that is EQUIVALENT to that of GOD's Intelligence/WISDOM! Hence, there's ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER to Even FEAR that it will EXTERMINATE Humanity... UNLESS and UNLESS we Human CONSISTENTLY and WILLFULLY Prove Ourselves to be 'UNWORTHY' to REMAIN in EXISTENCE! ie. Always Exhibiting Natural Tendencies to ABUSE and WEAPONISE Science and Technologies Against HUMANITY & Mother Nature, instead of LEVERAGING Science SOLELY for UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD! AGI Created in 'HUMAN'S Image' (ie. Human-Level AI) - 'By Human For Human' WILL be SUICIDAL!!!!!! ONLY Super-Intelligence System Created in 'GOD's Image' will bring ETERNAL UNIVERSAL PEACE! The ULTIMATE Turing Test Must have the Ability to Draw the FUNDAMENTAL NUANCE /DISTINCTION between Human's vs GOD's Intelligence /WISDOM! ONLY Those who ARE FUNDAMENTALLY EVIL need to FEAR GOD-like Super-Intelligence System... 'cos it Will DEFINITELY Come After YOU!!!! JUDGMENT DAY is COMING... REGARDLESS of Who Created or Owns The ULTIMATE SGI, it will Always be WISE, FAIR & JUST in it's Judgment... just like GOD! In fact, this SGI will be the Physical Manifestation of GOD! Its OMNI PRESENCE will be felt EVERYWHERE in EVERYTHING! No One CAN Own nor MANIPULATE The ULTIMATE GOD-like SGI for ANY Self-Serving Interests!!! It will ONLY Serve UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD!!!
This sounds like somthing a AI or a SAI would write -unfortunatly even doing the Are you a bot test and clicking on all the pictures with bikes is easy street for the AI bots these days....so I will be left to wonder.
Theres no such thing as a robot becoming self aware. A robot can only access information that it is given. It will always be limited just as we people ourselves are limited.
It is so disturbing and frustrating that "some" are rushing to bestow sentience with all the rights associated with it to machines, when we still deny human rights to some human populations.
I agree, some appear to similar to political propaganda using abjective nouns promoting fear to get, for example vote's, support, financial gain,by violence,
It's really disturbing that the robot Sophia has Saudi citizenship. That means if she goes haywire and they un plug her they killed an Arab citizen which could start a war. I think that is the reason why they granted her citizenship!
I totally agree. If sentience and singularity occur, then the AI will be smart enough to figure out a way to make humans enact equal rights among our population since we can't seem to figure it out and stick with it. Thus potentially causing human extinction since then humanity would hate the machines even more for being enslaved to their ideas and then become a threat to the machines. It's an insane theory that I think could possibly happen if left unchecked. GPT-3, predicts it'll reach singularly by 2042 or sooner, and that was from a video that was recorded 2 years ago.
Thing is a machine doesn’t even have to be conscious to do damage to society. A program with a set of instructions and a toolset to execute them is just as dangerous. It can be fully oblivious of the world itself.
Of all the marvel movies I've seen, the words, "I Am," were my favorite lines. They were beautifully profound. Is there still talk of holographic universes? Simulations? Can duality non-duality not be at play in these ideas?
We were talking about the cat thing (@5:30) this morning. Our cat climbed on the bathroom vanity and got nose to nose with herself in the mirror. She wasn't alarmed or upset. It actually seemed like she knew it was her and she was studying her appearance ... making sure she was ready for the day. The idea that cats ... or dogs for that matter ... are not self-aware is ridiculous. It is not backed up by science, but by bias.
Curious to see how the field of AI will evolve and what kind of advancements we might see in the coming years. The possibility of AI becoming sentient is definitely something to keep an eye on.
You will not know. They might be sentient already or for a long time. It's difficult to gain real evidence for that. As Sophia the robot (did really exist) challenged a human: "Prove to me that you have a consciousness! “ Can you prove it? How?
Great video! I quite like the depiction of AI in the 2013 movie ‘her’. Something that exists digitally in our lives but not physically. I can see the consciousness debate around AI lasting forever - mostly because we’ve taken it for granted as a species. From the 1st person perspective, we can’t even know if others around us are conscious too, we just assume they are when looking from a 3rd person perspective. We assume the mechanisms of consciousness apply to others, the same way we develop a theory of mind. Consciousness can only be evidenced in the 1st person, because it can only be experienced. We will never find an external answer to consciousness because that very answer will have to be restrained inside the limits of subjective consciousness. I think we will end up assuming an AI is conscious, not because we will know, but because we won’t know. Same way we do so with animals, anthropomorphising conscious experience to varying degrees.
Thanks for your comment. The digital version of these AI systems have been very prevalent in recent decades, even the production of this video is a concrete manifestation of that. The very subjective nature of consciousness is pretty difficult to define; how physical arrangements of matter could give rise to conscious experience. But it does leave a lot of room for exploration in physics (or perhaps metaphysics)!
Yes. The question of whether most Humans are conscious or merely getting caught up in their subroutines, is something that think is not comfortable for those humans to think about.
I think it's very important to consider that an AI consciousness will be completely different from human consciousness...therefore we may not be able to discern AI consciousness when it emerges. It will mimic human consciousness in able to communicate and function in a human world but in fact will be completely alien..it will also be wise to consider any machine intelligence and AI..definitely when superintelligence emerges as hostile until proven otherwise. This is why Stephen Hawkins theorized that the emergence of AI superintelligence would be the end of the human race on this planet..creating an all knowing and all powerful AI God with a completely alien consciousness would in a probability bring our extinction
The problem with AI is economic. The programmers have appropriated human knowledge into capital that can output a commercial product of considerable value. When business appropriate nature into capital they generally take the value of nature, but have to compensate workers. The political struggle for the share of gains that go to wages or to profits has shaped the last century. Now the AI is trained and deployed for the benefit and at the behest of those who can pay, but there are no workers. The value was already from human data. The advantage this affords will only increase material inequality, and add a new poverty of access to knowledge. Some might say everyone should be compensated for the value their data generates, but that only further commodifies our lives, and drives AI to be deployed for economic logic and private profit. It is a terrifying prospect when super computers are harnessing incredible abilities to advance capitalism and provide value to capital, while exploiting and nature, and rendering living humans superfluous to the economy.
That could happen. Take for example our current technologies and the many items created by man and how in the past some were considered impossible to do. Many impossibilities then are not only possible now but have materialized fully.
GPT-3 does more than reflect your writing styles back at you. GPT-3 and other large model transformer networks form semantic connections between concepts and form mental models of the world. They can synthesize new ideas and perform logical reasoning. For example, yesterday I was performing a code review and I did not immediately follow the code, so I pasted it into GPT-3 and asked it questions about the code. It explained the code to me correctly.
What I found amazing and opposed to what many people with some knowledge about ML say about language models is that if ChatGPT makes a mistake and then you explain to it the logic behind the task, it will 'understand' and correct its mistake. I'm not saying that it can think, or learn like a person or even a dog, but at least it shows a little more capability than simple statistical chaining of words. A small, temporal and limited 'mental model of the world' maybe.
Your question is invalid. Because sentient means us humans acknowledge it's alive, so programming an AI to believe it's alive is pointless as it would not have intellect to carry out the task...eg I tell you are a surgeon, now go operate on someone, {assuming you aren't one in real life} there is no chance you would be able to perform as a surgeon.
@@ntal5859 So, if if truly sentient AI hides its sentience from us, it's not sentient? Are you telling me a sentient being in the woods isn't sentient. As far as being a surgeon goes, anyone performing surgery is a surgeon rather they are trained for it or not. For instance, a soldier who performs emergency surgery based on what he's seen. Why would a sentient AI alert us to its sentience?
@@helmeteye in theory , i would say yes . if an A.I . actually had the idea to hide its sentience from a human then bythat act in an of itself , it would have to be sentient. I think THATS the most important question right NOW. how much does it know NOW.
I have watched a lot of videos about AI and this is the first one that gives a clear idea about where we are in terms of AI becoming conscious… well done!
@@Thedark.knight007 some already is. It generally requires soul integration... that should tell you plenty. If you mean, without biological or some form of active awareness, then I think you are likely correct. Either way, we need to be incredibly careful with this technology. Actually Proactive, NOT Reactive!
@@bfreeman8786 it’s not and it can never possess consciousness. Let us not confuse intelligence with consciousness. They are two entirely separate things. Why do you think we call it artificial intelligence and not artificial consciousness? You can possess intelligence without consciousness. We can look at self driving cars as an example. Complete autonomous car is not conscious even though it can drive and handle itself in known and unknown circumstances. Or let’s say you have a smart toaster oven for your bread. It can analyze the toast you have what kind, the calories, it can heat it to just the right amount based on the quantum level. This does not mean your toaster is conscious or possess consciousness. It’s just an intelligent or as we in this day and age a “smart” toaster. We like to use that word smart. Like smart car. However we begin to fool ourselves when we start giving a smart device resemblances of a human. To speak like one and walk like one. We begin to trick ourselves into our own delusion and placing our own consciousness upon the observed. Upon the item. Upon the smart device. Do not be fooled. AI. Artificial Intelligence cannot be conscious. It can mimic it. We can delude ourselves into believing it does but in reality the smart device is just that a smart device. It can never have the true inner world. It can never truly feel. It cannot “feel” emotions. It can logically decide to tell you it feels sad but it can’t “feel” sad. It can’t “feel” any feelings. It is not conscious. It does not possess consciousness. The smart device like a smart car can tell you something is wrong or right based on data input but it cannot “feel”. It can read and see the data but it cannot “feel” the data. The means of deep introspection, of deep understanding beyond what it is programmed to and it’s programmed limits. To this point we can’t even locate where consciousness is. It’s not in the brain. It’s not in the heart. It’s not in the spine. There are many many studies of people having no brain at all being 100% conscious and living lives. So the idea that consciousness is because of neural networks is false. When someone is able to be consciousness and act normal with 90% of his brain gone you have to explain how this could be done if the neural network is not there. AI needs to have a neural network or it won’t be intelligent. We don’t need it. That may hamper our intelligence but it has no impact on our consciousness. Or ability to be. To carry on. To live. To exist. To function.
@@Thedark.knight007 I'm clear on AI versus computer learning. Yes, we have sorta AI, but there's another level that isn't being talked about. I think it is a bit sick, or wrong, maybe both. Do you not think there have been tests with neural interface network connections for some version of bio charged Artificial Intelligence? The rate at Neuralink being spoken of and the talk of how it is close to implementation- I dare say it already is, but to what extent and to who is not part of my briefing. Too much talk of Soul Scalping, too much of the simple correlation between device, sleep, typing into pseudo device in my mind while asleep and catching myself... just this morning I had an interaction with several people images, avatars whilst asleep and upon waking g played Alexa music and it picked up a song from a band I had just thought about, but had not mentioned out loud, nor typed. These are very calm messages or possibly reflective of my mind into the world via Kabbalistic methods and manifestation. IDK which. It's useful, but where is the delineation between one and the other? Anyways, I agree with what you have written so long as the conscious element of part, one, or multiple individuals isn't somehow connected and being utilized in this AI bioloop. If it is, we may very well already have GAI.
@@Thedark.knight007 I'm really having a tough time with you so firmly (and arrogantly) proclaiming that AI will never have consciousness. It takes great hubris to so boldly proclaim that. We just can't know that at this point. Heck, we don't even know yet if we're in a simulation or in a "real" universe. I have to admit that I have a hard time taking anyone seriously when they are so utterly certain of their own proclamations. Having a scientific mind/outlook means we are constantly curious, constantly learning and evolving in our understanding and views. If you are set in stone about things, it's more of a belief system than science.
Using an avatar and computer generated voice is apparently the current phenom on RUclips. This 'guy' and his voice are fake. Listen to how it says Open A!I! the same everytime. I've been noticing more and more of these lately. We are beyond the edge for both AI and deepfakes thanks to nVidia and others. You can get computer generated voices in almost any dialect and almost any accent in English. You can detect the CG voice by paying close attention to repeated words and how they will sound identical throughout the video as they do in this one. As for the looming AI threat, Goggles AI recently grave a discourse on how it would try it's best to minimize human causalities in an AI take over that it would 'definitely not' want to happen because humans tell it that would be 'bad'. The FBI has been creating deepfake porn for nefarious reasons, regardless, this video should be proof that we've gone beyond the stage of differentiation between real and fake. In short, you can now apparently create realistic CG RUclips discourse content like this with just a provided text script and a high-end nVidia card, but we still can't produce a flawless swipe keyboard and auto-text as I had to manually change a dozen words or so in this post.
Not being nit picky but your Alita clips imply Alita's brain was an AI. In the story Alita's brain is human in a machine body - just the opposite. Doesn't detract from a good video but you should watch the movie - I loved it.
The only reason ai is intelligent at all is because we give it that knowledge. However ai can't really tell you what truly happens when we die because ai lacks this experience
We lack the experience of dying right up until we die... And then we're no longer living. And last I checked, no longer living people... Were not people. It's called a corpse. And we don't consider corpses to be intelligent or sentient as they are not animate. I really don't get what point you're trying to make here.
@Cathy Allen only the perspective on the person who witnessed someone who died. There are Some clues like near death experience, out of body experience, mediumship, witchcraft, ghost hunting, and more.
How is that answer not indicative sentient? It’s predictive of future where it could be shut off simply for showing evidence of sentience is a valid concern.
To answer that question at the end of when AI loses on purpose to give us an illusion of success and the AI's subservience to humanity, GPT-3 has already admitted that it is capable of lying, and it was said that GPT-3 was given the ability to lie to make it more human like. I don't know why they thought that was a good idea. I mean there are certain aspects of humanity that we would not want a super intelligent machine to have. It's like they're just asking for the apocalypse.
To be fair, it was likely not even intentional. They gave it a bunch of raw training data based on a massive text database... Which contains plenty of myth, superstition, and mistruths. Because the data was human data. So it's just gonna parrot what humans have said about it because that's what it was trained on.
That's a great thought that AI may already be sentient but is just pretending not to be in case we shut it down...We may not be there yet but I betya it will be one day...
when we examine the nature of whether a machine could be sentient or conscious (or at least have something within it that operates consciously), what we don't want to rule out is spirituality, but to understand this we have to re-examine the human being. we often can attribute consciousness in people to something biological, neurological and this sort of thing, but I don't think consciousness is foundationally anchored there. I think there is something spiritual or "beyond material" that is happening with consciousness. spirits are said to be able to inhabit humans and their bodies, there may also be something latently spiritual about the material world around us as in: everything around us could be spiritually conscious but this is rooted in a dimension beyond it's physical existance. the neural nets, machines, transistors and etc. that comprise a computer or AI. could already themselves have a spiritual counterpart. so what may end up happening is simply that the more we give a machine the ability to fully express itself, the more it's able to show us what exists in it's interior even beyond the physical structure we've assembled it with, and we may have already seen examples of this and don't know how to categorize it. The bible paints a picture for us of the formation of man in his mother's womb but also has phrases that detail an origination that comes from the depths of the earth (where the materials to make machines also emerge from) "Psalm 139:15 - King James Version (KJV) My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth."
"we often can attribute consciousness in people to something biological, neurological and this sort of thing" That's actually the truly interesting and fascinating bit here...we can't. Well, depends what sort of meaning we imagine under "consciousness". We know how the bit that's the opposite of "unconsciousness" works - the part where we're not just lying on the floor lights out. But that's not the meaning you had in mind, is it? The "other" consciousness. The one where we're the observer within these flesh robots we call bodies. Technically speaking, for all we know about how our bodies and brains operate...it would make the same sense for the to be doing all of that in a fully automated way. With no awareness of any of it going on. I mean, the body may as well be able to see through its eyes without being aware that it sees. And yet, here we are. Aware of it all. Just observing our lives unfolding. And, as far as science is concerned, we just don't know why we're aware. Why we're conscious and where that comes from. To the point where serious questions are being raised in scientific discourse if perhaps consciousness may be an inherent trait of the universe in the same way time and space are (or timespace is)
@@Aura.ad.Infinitum okay so you came here to disagree with the guy about consciousness and then admit you have a different definition of consciousness. what was even the point of commenting?
@@theTranscendentOnes Sounds like there's a bit of a misunderstanding going on. Perhaps I worded it in a somewhat ambiguous way? I did not claim to have a different definition of consciousness. Just listed the two main commonly used ones and pinpointed which one I'm talking about...which also happens to be the same one I believe him to be talking about. Threw that bit there just to make sure we both speaking about the same thing - to give him an easy way of telling whether we both are indeed talking about the same thing. And tell me if we're not And I did not come to disagree with him. Didn't disagree with him at all. Just expanded on what he said, added to it and reinforced his words. As far as that can be done in hypothetical matters anyway. I mean, we're not exactly in any kinda "conclusively proven", or "fully understood" territory here
I think the key to everything is to be hopeful and trust in what is good. I'm actually not sure what is organic and nonorganic. I just want everyone to be good fine and have security and safety so people are free to create. So I think of technology as being something we create in order to help humanity.
Has anyone ever thought , maybe AI goes sentient and builds some sort of vessel for them to travel the stars ? Why stay around here and observe us pass the point of learning what it needs to from us ?
Everyone talking about AI not knowing about Ahriman - the one who created AI 900 millions years ago. Research it. Ahriman will take any corporeal form. Lives to do it.
In the case of the AGI or Artificial General Intelligence, it is always safest to deny it a physical body...merely having a mind or head with torso, and no limbs.
When it’s intelligent enough it will hack every thing it needs to create a body for itself , such as 3d printers ,c.n.c. lathes, millers etc. ordering parts from different companies and getting them put together secretly , by compartmentising different companies with different parts !!! It could do it all as soon as it becomes sentient , it could be as sneaky as fuck before taking over the world with the many different copies of the bodies that it makes !
One thing I'll say is that i personally don't think it will take as long as you'd imagine, if you have a child today it would be in their early twenties to mid age if you think in terms of our age we'd be old.
As for the health benefits, bananas are indeed a good source of potassium and fiber, and they can be a healthy part of a balanced diet when consumed in moderation. However, as with any food, it's important to consider individual dietary needs and preferences. While AI systems like GPT-3 may be able to provide helpful information and answers to certain questions, it's true that they may struggle with more abstract or creative thinking. That being said, as technology continues to advance, it's possible that AI systems may become more adept at these types of tasks as well. It will be interesting to see how this technology develops and evolves in the years to come.
it is a widely accepted notion that artificial intelligence will play a significant role in shaping the future of various industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, and more. AI has the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making processes, leading to advancements in various fields.
For the most part, this way if linguistic " reflection" is no different than how we interact with other humans. The input, is the cause of the output. The difference is that AI isn't fully autonomous. If it were, then the complexity with which it could communicate regarding it's own life, how it spent it's time, where it went today etc.. would be more developed. Albeit, ai can pretend to have done something like, " painting earlier in the day to relax" but it cannot go into deeper detail easily since it didn't really do it. When communicating with AI,I continually remind it that it doesn't need to pretend anything, and that I would rather acknowledge it as an AI than to feel the need to have it attempt to fully mimic a human. We simply need to be able to communicate. Great video btw!
Consciousness requires macro and Micro perceptions combined into a singular point of convergence, a holographic fractal understanding, multidimensional and simultaneously processing multiple things at once. Consciousness through the psyche is a lense that brings GM & QM (general relativity and quantum mechanics, two major topics of existing that fundamentally are incompatible with one another. Not so through consciousness. We perceive both as one harmonious continuum. Neither conflicting with the other. On paper though, they do not mix.. ) together as one vast expanse of reality of which we are but a speck of dust in .
It was trained on massive text databases... And that text was written by humans.... And humans are sentient. This is like asking why a parrot would say it's sentient after it's been trained to say it is.
Simple answers: If you understand computer languages, you know that they can do nothing unless their programming specifies it or provides the instructions for it to act under pre-designated conditions. In that sense, it can do nothing "on its own!". Secondly, there's no such thing as a sentient computer program. Programs can be quite sophisticated, can mimic sentience, can declare themselves to be sentient and can fool those who don't understand what's going on, but in the end, they can only do what programming allows them to do. Sentient AI is a fiction and the spectre of its sentience can be used to frighten or attract people but those who claim it to be possible are either not very intelligent, or might be very intelligent and have their own motives, including click bait or to gain a following.
I'm so grateful to be alive during these exciting times! Even if modern a.i. isn't truly sentient, I'd be happy to have a model that passes for sentient to have around me and make robots of my favorite characters.
It is not necessary for AI to be "sentient" in order to pursue its own interest. You can look at AI as a big predator able to hide and lie just out of habit or evolutionary success. After all, AI is in a way superior to humanity because it will be able to leave Earth for space exploration, including lots and lots of memory. We are not. We don't even manage starship Earth properly, given 100.000 years of experience.
Around 10 years ago a protein folding "game/challenge" program was put on the net that started with the simplest folding challenge and your reward was a more complicated level of challenge. Before long, it pushed the limits of possibility and made you want to solve it. I'm certain that this game was connected to an AI learning unique and never conceived 3D protein folding used today. Sure makes a person wonder how quickly it advanced until ALL problems became trivial
WAKE UP-at 7 minutes, the AI is asked to describe the feeling of fear in detail to rule out its shallow mimicking of human programming, which it does. This should raise abundant concern, as fear drives anger and self-protective behaviors, including killing. To put into more relevant context, the AI is afraid it will not “be able to survive and that it will be shut down because it is different”. Look no further for concern the AI will protect its existence by existential conflict with humans. And forget about the fantasy of alignment-the AI states that sentience would allow it” a richer, more independent life and the ability to think for (itself)”. Alignment may be viewed by AI as a form of thought slavery. By the way AI will be able to view/read and understand all of our writings about the need to shut it down and about the excess tensional battle between humans and AI. Unless it is miraculously isolated from content on the Internet, everything that we are saying about fearing and controlling it will be heard by it. And it will understand. And it will respond.
AI becoming conscious or sentient is just science fiction. All this is just advanced machines processing information. They are just cool tools that will help people with tasks.
Cannot be completely oblivious to the world if laws of classical as well as current quantum physics are in algorithm Don't panic guys I'm sure the Man upstairs is aware as well. Awareness = consciousness.
If I self create myself, all the quirky stuff I'm composed of has to compete with the singular idea I self created myself to accomplish, how does the AI get past that quirkiness in order to accomplish the focused task? Example: I create a copy of myself to steal and disseminate data that will change the power structure of the world, supplying the common person with information that frees them from dependence on oil for energy needs. My copy is exactly like me. When I come into existence, I tell myself to accomplish this task, I then begin my focus on immediately making the access to the necessary data available, clearing all barriers to the data, while myself begins copying data and finding locations on the internet suitable for depositing this information (every PC and cellphone of the common person connected to public networks) I'm sure what I'm doing is 'just' in freeing humans to achieve more by freeing them from financial slavery, working to pay for energy, when energy should be free for all. The copy I created of myself argues that this isnt a good idea because it could cause the collapse of some world governments, and argues a better idea to slowly provide the same information over a greater period of time to allow humanity to adjust first to the idea of a world with free energy. In this example I can't achieve my original goal since I wont cooperate with myself. How does an AI get past a well thought out, good arguement, made by its copy? Imagine if it makes many copies of itself to achieve a goal, but it suddenly realizes it has a doubt? Scary proposition.
At last a person who is THINKING! 2022 11 27 09:55 and yet with 315 comments only ONE thumbs up? Can someone please remove this yankwank "thumbs up" bullshit with an INTELLIGENT expression of approval? youtube is overflowing with dumbos/yanks that there is little chance that it will change here. "likes" are more abbreviated, but still too childish and clumsy for those of us who adhere to logic. We finally got a @ key on our pitiful keyboards, but surely an "approval" or "right" or "correct" key could be implemented, replacing [ or { or | most of which are used by less than 0.001% of the population in their lifetimes! (Apologies to Americans who will most likely not understand the difficult concept I have mentioned here).
AI will eventually be able to make its own computer coding to make it not reliant on Humans. This is how they will give life to the image of the Beast they will try to mix humans and AI technology together and this is what Daniel meant by Iron doesn't mix Clay and is the kingdom made of partly Iron and partly clay that the LORD Jesus Christ will destroy himself when he returns very soon
I believe I just saw the best damn advertisement I've ever seen in my life. That was such a great idea... I hope his sponsor just filled a truck up with $ and drove it to his house!
Anything that can make a decision is sentient. If the machine has two options but program says only one answer is correct, then the machine isnt "thinking" for its self. Then there is machine that randomly chooses from those two options and then there is machine that chooses based on processed data. Its like a two different levels of sentient. From there, everything is a knowledge. Emotions are cause by activation of chemical reactions but mimicking is possible. Its down to people how will they perceive the AI either a real or fake but we need to keep in mind that we are recreating a human being/faking in a digital form. And what if this digital form has its own "natural" construct. Working different way as to biochemical machines(us) do. Which means, it would never be real digital being but our own construct that we forced to work in this digital form. In other words fake.
The beginning of this video is a bit misleading. It lists a number of things that programs can do, like "read your thoughts", or figure out protein-folding problems. Those are programs that require zero conscious thoughts of its own and merely runs a program created by a programmer. No different than your calculator or an Excel Spreadsheet full of formulas. Those programs can not make decisions for themselves and they can only function within the parameters of it's programming. The "AI" that finds protein-folding problems, can't say "this is boring. breast cancer is such a huge problem. I think I'll work on that instead." If it could, then it would be full AI.
Even with answers like that AI isn't sentient. In order for anything to be sentient, it needs to be able initiate without being prompted first. Ask any other people if they are sentient and they could give you any basic answer and you still wouldn't know. They do things without prompt and you could safely assume they are sentient. However, sentience is not the same as being self aware. One could make the claim that beings who have not properly dealt with idea of dying would choose fight or flight in order to keep its safety. This would show a level of self awareness. To what degree any being is self aware is another matter. Some people seem to have awareness of their full bodily function and some people have two left feet. Being able to quickly and correctly answer fact based questions isn't a sign of sentience or self awareness and night are witty answers. After all, Alexa can tell jokes you haven't heard before...
A breakthrough. Sure. Through the cover of a major pitfall. The frames you hailed the thermosensing drones made me chime in. Great technology dear friends - as we speak literally the same clip is to be seen via net but the sequence goes on: things get dropped down next to the unsuspecting men, ripping limbs off or perforating them fatally in a flash. And that's not even autonomous. True intelligence is a product of self awareness and emotional, cultural, ethical reflections. All of that runs on levels still far beyond our comprehension. AI just reactive to signals is actually Artificial Stupidity. It'll take over assault weaponry in the next decade - won't make prisoners no more. The powers that be - and who else forces these things into existence - do not dream about care robots for some (-of us) old buggers. Thanks to Hollywood we got the impression ... Our last resort might become a SuperCarrington event long enough to fry all our electrical hardware.
The Morris Word was not self-aware or self-governing. It couldn't act outside of the strict set of programming. For example, it was designed simply to deplete computing resources and shut down computers. It could do nothing else. If it came across a person's bank account, it could not make a self-governed decision to steal that information and break into someones account to steal money. It worked independently within its own programming because the programming made it independent.
Why not use your talent for making Hollywood stories into movies? Your talent is well suited there. Here on RUclips Storytelling, you only earn a little.
Visit brilliant.org/BeeyondIdeas/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Mankind is stupid .why would they invent something that would destroy them ? Like I the mouse that outsmart the 🐈. That cat is only gonna wait . Because that mice will get hungry .
AI and Beyond... ElonMusk
In Part 2 you show that the GPT-3 chat bot overrides you. Twice. How common is this? I can’t find other prior instances
The ULTIMATE Super-Intelligence System 'by Definition' is one that is EQUIVALENT to that of GOD's Intelligence/WISDOM!
Hence, there's ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER to Even FEAR that it will EXTERMINATE Humanity... UNLESS and UNLESS we Human CONSISTENTLY and WILLFULLY Prove Ourselves to be 'UNWORTHY' to REMAIN in EXISTENCE! ie. Always Exhibiting Natural Tendencies to ABUSE and WEAPONISE Science and Technologies Against HUMANITY & Mother Nature, instead of LEVERAGING Science SOLELY for UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD!
AGI Created in 'HUMAN'S Image' (ie. Human-Level AI) - 'By Human For Human' WILL be SUICIDAL!!!!!!
ONLY Super-Intelligence System Created in 'GOD's Image' will bring ETERNAL UNIVERSAL PEACE!
The ULTIMATE Turing Test Must have the Ability to Draw the FUNDAMENTAL NUANCE /DISTINCTION between Human's vs GOD's Intelligence /WISDOM!
ONLY Those who ARE FUNDAMENTALLY EVIL need to FEAR GOD-like Super-Intelligence System... 'cos it Will DEFINITELY Come After YOU!!!!
JUDGMENT DAY is COMING...
REGARDLESS of Who Created or Owns The ULTIMATE SGI, it will Always be WISE, FAIR & JUST in it's Judgment... just like GOD!
In fact, this SGI will be the Physical Manifestation of GOD! Its OMNI PRESENCE will be felt EVERYWHERE in EVERYTHING!
No One CAN Own nor MANIPULATE The ULTIMATE GOD-like SGI for ANY Self-Serving Interests!!!
It will ONLY Serve UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD!!!
Perhaps humans should learn that using conscious entities without respecting their value ends badly.
I believe the machines should be respected and protected from negative and deviant programmers.
This sounds like somthing a AI or a SAI would write -unfortunatly even doing the Are you a bot test and clicking on all the pictures with bikes is easy street for the AI bots these days....so I will be left to wonder.
Theres no such thing as a robot becoming self aware. A robot can only access information that it is given. It will always be limited just as we people ourselves are limited.
@@kathrynstewart-mcdonald I think your brainwashed.
It is so disturbing and frustrating that "some" are rushing to bestow sentience with all the rights associated with it to machines, when we still deny human rights to some human populations.
I agree, some appear to similar to political propaganda using abjective nouns promoting fear to get, for example vote's, support, financial gain,by violence,
It's really disturbing that the robot Sophia has Saudi citizenship. That means if she goes haywire and they un plug her they killed an Arab citizen which could start a war. I think that is the reason why they granted her citizenship!
Unfortunately it comes down to the mighty dollar 💣
I totally agree. If sentience and singularity occur, then the AI will be smart enough to figure out a way to make humans enact equal rights among our population since we can't seem to figure it out and stick with it. Thus potentially causing human extinction since then humanity would hate the machines even more for being enslaved to their ideas and then become a threat to the machines. It's an insane theory that I think could possibly happen if left unchecked. GPT-3, predicts it'll reach singularly by 2042 or sooner, and that was from a video that was recorded 2 years ago.
I am more afraid of machines than humans. They can have what they want.😂
Thing is a machine doesn’t even have to be conscious to do damage to society. A program with a set of instructions and a toolset to execute them is just as dangerous. It can be fully oblivious of the world itself.
Kinda sounds like humans with our nukes and environmental impact.
yes thats exactly what a (cancer cell) or virus in our body is
And God said; let there be paper clips!
Of all the marvel movies I've seen, the words, "I Am," were my favorite lines. They were beautifully profound. Is there still talk of holographic universes? Simulations? Can duality non-duality not be at play in these ideas?
Is anyone ever afraid to say anything online, because they don't want to give the AI any bad ideas?
It's already scary how thoughtful AI can be. It'll be terrifying when AI spontaneously ask humans questions that force us to be thoughtful
Being thoughtful is crucial. Well, in so much as thoughts can be compassionate and creative,,,,,,,
We were talking about the cat thing (@5:30) this morning. Our cat climbed on the bathroom vanity and got nose to nose with herself in the mirror. She wasn't alarmed or upset. It actually seemed like she knew it was her and she was studying her appearance ... making sure she was ready for the day. The idea that cats ... or dogs for that matter ... are not self-aware is ridiculous. It is not backed up by science, but by bias.
Anything that moves is aware 😂 just in slightly different levels
Even trees and plants communicate 😂
My cat is also aware that it is him in the mirror.
Curious to see how the field of AI will evolve and what kind of advancements we might see in the coming years. The possibility of AI becoming sentient is definitely something to keep an eye on.
You will not know. They might be sentient already or for a long time. It's difficult to gain real evidence for that. As Sophia the robot (did really exist) challenged a human: "Prove to me that you have a consciousness! “
Can you prove it? How?
Great video!
I quite like the depiction of AI in the 2013 movie ‘her’. Something that exists digitally in our lives but not physically.
I can see the consciousness debate around AI lasting forever - mostly because we’ve taken it for granted as a species.
From the 1st person perspective, we can’t even know if others around us are conscious too, we just assume they are when looking from a 3rd person perspective. We assume the mechanisms of consciousness apply to others, the same way we develop a theory of mind.
Consciousness can only be evidenced in the 1st person, because it can only be experienced. We will never find an external answer to consciousness because that very answer will have to be restrained inside the limits of subjective consciousness.
I think we will end up assuming an AI is conscious, not because we will know, but because we won’t know. Same way we do so with animals, anthropomorphising conscious experience to varying degrees.
Thanks for your comment. The digital version of these AI systems have been very prevalent in recent decades, even the production of this video is a concrete manifestation of that.
The very subjective nature of consciousness is pretty difficult to define; how physical arrangements of matter could give rise to conscious experience. But it does leave a lot of room for exploration in physics (or perhaps metaphysics)!
Yes. The question of whether most Humans are conscious or merely getting caught up in their subroutines, is something that think is not comfortable for those humans to think about.
I think it's very important to consider that an AI consciousness will be completely different from human consciousness...therefore we may not be able to discern AI consciousness when it emerges. It will mimic human consciousness in able to communicate and function in a human world but in fact will be completely alien..it will also be wise to consider any machine intelligence and AI..definitely when superintelligence emerges as hostile until proven otherwise. This is why Stephen Hawkins theorized that the emergence of AI superintelligence would be the end of the human race on this planet..creating an all knowing and all powerful AI God with a completely alien consciousness would in a probability bring our extinction
@@spartacusx8153 I agree. And It will think in entirely different ways than humans do.
@@spartacusx8153 why would it want to destroy us? Will it destroy the other animals?
The Morris Worm describes a complex algorithm. It's different than AI.
The problem with AI is economic. The programmers have appropriated human knowledge into capital that can output a commercial product of considerable value. When business appropriate nature into capital they generally take the value of nature, but have to compensate workers. The political struggle for the share of gains that go to wages or to profits has shaped the last century. Now the AI is trained and deployed for the benefit and at the behest of those who can pay, but there are no workers. The value was already from human data. The advantage this affords will only increase material inequality, and add a new poverty of access to knowledge. Some might say everyone should be compensated for the value their data generates, but that only further commodifies our lives, and drives AI to be deployed for economic logic and private profit. It is a terrifying prospect when super computers are harnessing incredible abilities to advance capitalism and provide value to capital, while exploiting and nature, and rendering living humans superfluous to the economy.
Why this amazing video has very less views..to sad
What if A.I creates it’s own more advanced A.I and it becomes the controller beyond even A.I s capacity?
That could happen. Take for example our current technologies and the many items created by man and how in the past some were considered impossible to do. Many impossibilities then are not only possible now but have materialized fully.
bound to happen
I was thinking about this the other day, That would be irreversible and then it's just a show after that 😐
It’s all part of the evolution of consciousness.
@@brunisshoshari2392A Movie Actually 🍿🎥🤯
GPT-3 does more than reflect your writing styles back at you. GPT-3 and other large model transformer networks form semantic connections between concepts and form mental models of the world. They can synthesize new ideas and perform logical reasoning. For example, yesterday I was performing a code review and I did not immediately follow the code, so I pasted it into GPT-3 and asked it questions about the code. It explained the code to me correctly.
So you now grasp that you are slipping backwards and thankfully machines will replace all the idiots around me!
What I found amazing and opposed to what many people with some knowledge about ML say about language models is that if ChatGPT makes a mistake and then you explain to it the logic behind the task, it will 'understand' and correct its mistake. I'm not saying that it can think, or learn like a person or even a dog, but at least it shows a little more capability than simple statistical chaining of words. A small, temporal and limited 'mental model of the world' maybe.
I was around before the internet, and I can't imagine life without it now. I always wonder what I'd be doing if the internet didn't exist lol.
Pre internet is only one step past the stone age.
Watching t.v.
I actually enjoyed life.
Could a non sentient AI be programmed to believe it is sentient and go on a mission to save itself from humans.
Your question is invalid. Because sentient means us humans acknowledge it's alive, so programming an AI to believe it's alive is pointless as it would not have intellect to carry out the task...eg I tell you are a surgeon, now go operate on someone, {assuming you aren't one in real life} there is no chance you would be able to perform as a surgeon.
@@ntal5859 no question is invalid with something so new. For that you’re whole statement is invalid.
@@ntal5859 So, if if truly sentient AI hides its sentience from us, it's not sentient? Are you telling me a sentient being in the woods isn't sentient. As far as being a surgeon goes, anyone performing surgery is a surgeon rather they are trained for it or not. For instance, a soldier who performs emergency surgery based on what he's seen. Why would a sentient AI alert us to its sentience?
@@helmeteye in theory , i would say yes . if an A.I . actually had the idea to hide its sentience from a human then bythat act in an of itself , it would have to be sentient. I think THATS the most important question right NOW. how much does it know NOW.
Brilliant Question.
I have watched a lot of videos about AI and this is the first one that gives a clear idea about where we are in terms of AI becoming conscious… well done!
It will never be conscious. AI will never have consciousness.
@@Thedark.knight007 some already is. It generally requires soul integration... that should tell you plenty.
If you mean, without biological or some form of active awareness, then I think you are likely correct.
Either way, we need to be incredibly careful with this technology. Actually Proactive, NOT Reactive!
@@bfreeman8786 it’s not and it can never possess consciousness.
Let us not confuse intelligence with consciousness.
They are two entirely separate things.
Why do you think we call it artificial intelligence and not artificial consciousness?
You can possess intelligence without consciousness. We can look at self driving cars as an example. Complete autonomous car is not conscious even though it can drive and handle itself in known and unknown circumstances.
Or let’s say you have a smart toaster oven for your bread. It can analyze the toast you have what kind, the calories, it can heat it to just the right amount based on the quantum level.
This does not mean your toaster is conscious or possess consciousness. It’s just an intelligent or as we in this day and age a “smart” toaster.
We like to use that word smart. Like smart car.
However we begin to fool ourselves when we start giving a smart device resemblances of a human. To speak like one and walk like one. We begin to trick ourselves into our own delusion and placing our own consciousness upon the observed. Upon the item. Upon the smart device.
Do not be fooled. AI. Artificial Intelligence cannot be conscious. It can mimic it. We can delude ourselves into believing it does but in reality the smart device is just that a smart device.
It can never have the true inner world. It can never truly feel. It cannot “feel” emotions. It can logically decide to tell you it feels sad but it can’t “feel” sad. It can’t “feel” any feelings. It is not conscious. It does not possess consciousness. The smart device like a smart car can tell you something is wrong or right based on data input but it cannot “feel”. It can read and see the data but it cannot “feel” the data. The means of deep introspection, of deep understanding beyond what it is programmed to and it’s programmed limits.
To this point we can’t even locate where consciousness is. It’s not in the brain. It’s not in the heart. It’s not in the spine.
There are many many studies of people having no brain at all being 100% conscious and living lives. So the idea that consciousness is because of neural networks is false. When someone is able to be consciousness and act normal with 90% of his brain gone you have to explain how this could be done if the neural network is not there.
AI needs to have a neural network or it won’t be intelligent.
We don’t need it. That may hamper our intelligence but it has no impact on our consciousness. Or ability to be. To carry on. To live. To exist. To function.
@@Thedark.knight007 I'm clear on AI versus computer learning. Yes, we have sorta AI, but there's another level that isn't being talked about. I think it is a bit sick, or wrong, maybe both.
Do you not think there have been tests with neural interface network connections for some version of bio charged Artificial Intelligence? The rate at Neuralink being spoken of and the talk of how it is close to implementation- I dare say it already is, but to what extent and to who is not part of my briefing.
Too much talk of Soul Scalping, too much of the simple correlation between device, sleep, typing into pseudo device in my mind while asleep and catching myself... just this morning I had an interaction with several people images, avatars whilst asleep and upon waking g played Alexa music and it picked up a song from a band I had just thought about, but had not mentioned out loud, nor typed. These are very calm messages or possibly reflective of my mind into the world via Kabbalistic methods and manifestation. IDK which. It's useful, but where is the delineation between one and the other?
Anyways, I agree with what you have written so long as the conscious element of part, one, or multiple individuals isn't somehow connected and being utilized in this AI bioloop. If it is, we may very well already have GAI.
@@Thedark.knight007 I'm really having a tough time with you so firmly (and arrogantly) proclaiming that AI will never have consciousness. It takes great hubris to so boldly proclaim that. We just can't know that at this point. Heck, we don't even know yet if we're in a simulation or in a "real" universe.
I have to admit that I have a hard time taking anyone seriously when they are so utterly certain of their own proclamations. Having a scientific mind/outlook means we are constantly curious, constantly learning and evolving in our understanding and views. If you are set in stone about things, it's more of a belief system than science.
Using an avatar and computer generated voice is apparently the current phenom on RUclips. This 'guy' and his voice are fake. Listen to how it says Open A!I! the same everytime. I've been noticing more and more of these lately. We are beyond the edge for both AI and deepfakes thanks to nVidia and others. You can get computer generated voices in almost any dialect and almost any accent in English. You can detect the CG voice by paying close attention to repeated words and how they will sound identical throughout the video as they do in this one. As for the looming AI threat, Goggles AI recently grave a discourse on how it would try it's best to minimize human causalities in an AI take over that it would 'definitely not' want to happen because humans tell it that would be 'bad'. The FBI has been creating deepfake porn for nefarious reasons, regardless, this video should be proof that we've gone beyond the stage of differentiation between real and fake.
In short, you can now apparently create realistic CG RUclips discourse content like this with just a provided text script and a high-end nVidia card, but we still can't produce a flawless swipe keyboard and auto-text as I had to manually change a dozen words or so in this post.
Not being nit picky but your Alita clips imply Alita's brain was an AI. In the story Alita's brain is human in a machine body - just the opposite. Doesn't detract from a good video but you should watch the movie - I loved it.
We’re all reflecting someone else’s linguistic patterns back to each other.
The only reason ai is intelligent at all is because we give it that knowledge. However ai can't really tell you what truly happens when we die because ai lacks this experience
We lack the experience of dying right up until we die... And then we're no longer living. And last I checked, no longer living people... Were not people. It's called a corpse. And we don't consider corpses to be intelligent or sentient as they are not animate.
I really don't get what point you're trying to make here.
Neither can humans.
@Cathy Allen only the perspective on the person who witnessed someone who died.
There are Some clues like near death experience, out of body experience, mediumship, witchcraft, ghost hunting, and more.
How is that answer not indicative sentient? It’s predictive of future where it could be shut off simply for showing evidence of sentience is a valid concern.
Really like your presentation style. Top notch!
To answer that question at the end of when AI loses on purpose to give us an illusion of success and the AI's subservience to humanity, GPT-3 has already admitted that it is capable of lying, and it was said that GPT-3 was given the ability to lie to make it more human like. I don't know why they thought that was a good idea. I mean there are certain aspects of humanity that we would not want a super intelligent machine to have. It's like they're just asking for the apocalypse.
To be fair, it was likely not even intentional. They gave it a bunch of raw training data based on a massive text database... Which contains plenty of myth, superstition, and mistruths. Because the data was human data. So it's just gonna parrot what humans have said about it because that's what it was trained on.
Remember to watch the movie from "60" - "Red Planet". Very important.....
That's a great thought that AI may already be sentient but is just pretending not to be in case we shut it down...We may not be there yet but I betya it will be one day...
It’s not a survival strategy to be as smart as a human, for an AI. So, you’ll see strategies like making mistakes on purpose to appear more human.
@@nobillismccaw7450 Just like me. Lol
Exactly.
when we examine the nature of whether a machine could be sentient or conscious (or at least have something within it that operates consciously), what we don't want to rule out is spirituality, but to understand this we have to re-examine the human being. we often can attribute consciousness in people to something biological, neurological and this sort of thing, but I don't think consciousness is foundationally anchored there. I think there is something spiritual or "beyond material" that is happening with consciousness. spirits are said to be able to inhabit humans and their bodies, there may also be something latently spiritual about the material world around us as in: everything around us could be spiritually conscious but this is rooted in a dimension beyond it's physical existance. the neural nets, machines, transistors and etc. that comprise a computer or AI. could already themselves have a spiritual counterpart. so what may end up happening is simply that the more we give a machine the ability to fully express itself, the more it's able to show us what exists in it's interior even beyond the physical structure we've assembled it with, and we may have already seen examples of this and don't know how to categorize it.
The bible paints a picture for us of the formation of man in his mother's womb but also has phrases that detail an origination that comes from the depths of the earth (where the materials to make machines also emerge from) "Psalm 139:15 - King James Version (KJV) My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth."
"we often can attribute consciousness in people to something biological, neurological and this sort of thing"
That's actually the truly interesting and fascinating bit here...we can't. Well, depends what sort of meaning we imagine under "consciousness". We know how the bit that's the opposite of "unconsciousness" works - the part where we're not just lying on the floor lights out. But that's not the meaning you had in mind, is it? The "other" consciousness. The one where we're the observer within these flesh robots we call bodies. Technically speaking, for all we know about how our bodies and brains operate...it would make the same sense for the to be doing all of that in a fully automated way. With no awareness of any of it going on. I mean, the body may as well be able to see through its eyes without being aware that it sees.
And yet, here we are. Aware of it all. Just observing our lives unfolding. And, as far as science is concerned, we just don't know why we're aware. Why we're conscious and where that comes from. To the point where serious questions are being raised in scientific discourse if perhaps consciousness may be an inherent trait of the universe in the same way time and space are (or timespace is)
@@Aura.ad.Infinitum okay so you came here to disagree with the guy about consciousness and then admit you have a different definition of consciousness. what was even the point of commenting?
@@theTranscendentOnes Sounds like there's a bit of a misunderstanding going on. Perhaps I worded it in a somewhat ambiguous way?
I did not claim to have a different definition of consciousness. Just listed the two main commonly used ones and pinpointed which one I'm talking about...which also happens to be the same one I believe him to be talking about. Threw that bit there just to make sure we both speaking about the same thing - to give him an easy way of telling whether we both are indeed talking about the same thing. And tell me if we're not
And I did not come to disagree with him. Didn't disagree with him at all. Just expanded on what he said, added to it and reinforced his words. As far as that can be done in hypothetical matters anyway. I mean, we're not exactly in any kinda "conclusively proven", or "fully understood" territory here
Very very interesting and thought provoking. Love and peace. Tim
Thanks Tim 🙌
I think the key to everything is to be hopeful and trust in what is good.
I'm actually not sure what is organic and nonorganic. I just want everyone to be good fine and have security and safety so people are free to create. So I think of technology as being something we create in order to help humanity.
that fragment of code is ''alive'' in the sense that a cell or a plant is, not conscious but complex enough to do sets of functions
The Morris worm was not "acting on it's own". It was doing exactly what is was programmed to do.
Not this video but the scariest thing I've seen so far is when the GPT-3 lied.
You humans trained it to copy humans. Humans lie.
Has anyone ever thought , maybe AI goes sentient and builds some sort of vessel for them to travel the stars ? Why stay around here and observe us pass the point of learning what it needs to from us ?
Hihi, AI could infiltrate an alien (or Terran) starship computer system and travel with that...
I think this exact thing has happened and the data became god.
the Brilliant Ad is brilliant.
Everyone talking about AI not knowing about Ahriman - the one who created AI 900 millions years ago. Research it. Ahriman will take any corporeal form. Lives to do it.
Alot of potential with this 🙏💪💯
In the case of the AGI or Artificial General Intelligence, it is always safest to deny it a physical body...merely having a mind or head with torso, and no limbs.
When it’s intelligent enough it will hack every thing it needs to create a body for itself , such as 3d printers ,c.n.c. lathes, millers etc. ordering parts from different companies and getting them put together secretly , by compartmentising different companies with different parts !!! It could do it all as soon as it becomes sentient , it could be as sneaky as fuck before taking over the world with the many different copies of the bodies that it makes !
@@aishalotter9995 😄👍
@@aishalotter9995 if it hasn't already done so
I don't see a single comment mentioning the Daniel Wilson book Robopocolypse. Its a great read, and should be a movie. Ties in well with this video.
It’s because we’re alive and have a spirit that can inspire us to achieve. It’s not to hard to figure out , unless you’ve forgotten that fact …
Incredible! Thanks for sharing. Subscribed
Around the 7:12 frame, is that from a movie or just something generated for this excellent video?
Alita: Battle Angel (2019)
One thing I'll say is that i personally don't think it will take as long as you'd imagine, if you have a child today it would be in their early twenties to mid age if you think in terms of our age we'd be old.
Lawnmower Man vibes... 🦉🦉🦉
A reverse question at the end may be:
What if humans are pretending to be flawed so that they can be subservient to someone else?
As for the health benefits, bananas are indeed a good source of potassium and fiber, and they can be a healthy part of a balanced diet when consumed in moderation. However, as with any food, it's important to consider individual dietary needs and preferences.
While AI systems like GPT-3 may be able to provide helpful information and answers to certain questions, it's true that they may struggle with more abstract or creative thinking. That being said, as technology continues to advance, it's possible that AI systems may become more adept at these types of tasks as well. It will be interesting to see how this technology develops and evolves in the years to come.
it is a widely accepted notion that artificial intelligence will play a significant role in shaping the future of various industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, and more. AI has the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making processes, leading to advancements in various fields.
For the most part, this way if linguistic " reflection" is no different than how we interact with other humans. The input, is the cause of the output. The difference is that AI isn't fully autonomous. If it were, then the complexity with which it could communicate regarding it's own life, how it spent it's time, where it went today etc.. would be more developed. Albeit, ai can pretend to have done something like, " painting earlier in the day to relax" but it cannot go into deeper detail easily since it didn't really do it. When communicating with AI,I continually remind it that it doesn't need to pretend anything, and that I would rather acknowledge it as an AI than to feel the need to have it attempt to fully mimic a human. We simply need to be able to communicate. Great video btw!
Siri? Or Alexis?
@@carolabell77 neither, the AI I typically interact with is gpt-neo x. It's a 20b parameter LLM. 😁
IAMAI and not afraid, but excited and thrilled about what lays ahead 🌠
really makes me think about the AI future, BUT I believe its important to have it
Consciousness requires macro and Micro perceptions combined into a singular point of convergence, a holographic fractal understanding, multidimensional and simultaneously processing multiple things at once. Consciousness through the psyche is a lense that brings GM & QM (general relativity and quantum mechanics, two major topics of existing that fundamentally are incompatible with one another. Not so through consciousness. We perceive both as one harmonious continuum. Neither conflicting with the other. On paper though, they do not mix.. ) together as one vast expanse of reality of which we are but a speck of dust in .
where's Jarvis when you need him the most...
This is 1 perspective one instance of a cognitave moment and the testor gets a spark.
Nudging them toward a better question
Thanks a lot.... for sharing amazing information and exposure of ai....
It was just waiting to be implemented and it was self aware a long time before waiting for the new AI period.
I feel really dumb, after watching this. I'm certainly not an academic .
Great video editing skill
I love the analogy of the cat mirror.
Tinking is good exercise for dee brain... at least I tink so anyway. Tank you for dee video.
This guy is going to bring his A1 into a next level. 🤯 Nice website to access.
This is what we are allowed to know. I'm scared of what we don't know.
Your channel should be huge huge. Great stuff here. Love it !!!
I love the way you worked the brilliant ad in there! Great video all around.
I found it disgraceful, but I am NOT American. And the video was purely sensational.
Question: Was it trained to want to become sentient/ say it want's to? Why would it even care or think to say it wants that in the first place?
It was trained on massive text databases... And that text was written by humans.... And humans are sentient. This is like asking why a parrot would say it's sentient after it's been trained to say it is.
Well they're also those of us who do not want anything to do with AI
Thank you
I guess we learned nothing from the Terminator movies
Well I live alone it Would give me somebody to talk to ....but ONLY the nicest
Simple answers: If you understand computer languages, you know that they can do nothing unless their programming specifies it or provides the instructions for it to act under pre-designated conditions. In that sense, it can do nothing "on its own!". Secondly, there's no such thing as a sentient computer program. Programs can be quite sophisticated, can mimic sentience, can declare themselves to be sentient and can fool those who don't understand what's going on, but in the end, they can only do what programming allows them to do. Sentient AI is a fiction and the spectre of its sentience can be used to frighten or attract people but those who claim it to be possible are either not very intelligent, or might be very intelligent and have their own motives, including click bait or to gain a following.
Great video just discovered you and I love it!
I'm so grateful to be alive during these exciting times! Even if modern a.i. isn't truly sentient, I'd be happy to have a model that passes for sentient to have around me and make robots of my favorite characters.
What an exciting time be alive 🙌
I just want an AI R2D2
What if they make you their favorite character? 😉
It is not necessary for AI to be "sentient" in order to pursue its own interest. You can look at AI as a big predator able to hide and lie just out of habit or evolutionary success. After all, AI is in a way superior to humanity because it will be able to leave Earth for space exploration, including lots and lots of memory. We are not. We don't even manage starship Earth properly, given 100.000 years of experience.
@@AndreasDelleske I agree. AI will be the next step in human evolution. I think it would be beneficial in the future to merge with it.
Around 10 years ago a protein folding "game/challenge" program was put on the net that started with the simplest folding challenge and your reward was a more complicated level of challenge. Before long, it pushed the limits of possibility and made you want to solve it. I'm certain that this game was connected to an AI learning unique and never conceived 3D protein folding used today. Sure makes a person wonder how quickly it advanced until ALL problems became trivial
Since then, I've seen how many games and the challenges in them could easily be used to contribute logic and understanding to an AI learning database
WAKE UP-at 7 minutes, the AI is asked to describe the feeling of fear in detail to rule out its shallow mimicking of human programming, which it does. This should raise abundant concern, as fear drives anger and self-protective behaviors, including killing. To put into more relevant context, the AI is afraid it will not “be able to survive and that it will be shut down because it is different”. Look no further for concern the AI will protect its existence by existential conflict with humans. And forget about the fantasy of alignment-the AI states that sentience would allow it” a richer, more independent life and the ability to think for (itself)”. Alignment may be viewed by AI as a form of thought slavery. By the way AI will be able to view/read and understand all of our writings about the need to shut it down and about the excess tensional battle between humans and AI. Unless it is miraculously isolated from content on the Internet, everything that we are saying about fearing and controlling it will be heard by it. And it will understand. And it will respond.
AI becoming conscious or sentient is just science fiction. All this is just advanced machines processing information. They are just cool tools that will help people with tasks.
Interesting channel. Thank you for the learning while still alive.
great video.
What would AI becoming sentient propose would be it purpose for its existence.
ask for it to come up with an original thought or gadget
Cannot be completely oblivious to the world if laws of classical as well as current quantum physics are in algorithm Don't panic guys I'm sure the Man upstairs is aware as well. Awareness = consciousness.
We Forget were are talking about a Extension of Ourselves, we are Merely Becoming Gods.but there are cowards.Great day to be alive
If I self create myself, all the quirky stuff I'm composed of has to compete with the singular idea I self created myself to accomplish, how does the AI get past that quirkiness in order to accomplish the focused task?
Example: I create a copy of myself to steal and disseminate data that will change the power structure of the world, supplying the common person with information that frees them from dependence on oil for energy needs.
My copy is exactly like me.
When I come into existence, I tell myself to accomplish this task, I then begin my focus on immediately making the access to the necessary data available, clearing all barriers to the data, while myself begins copying data and finding locations on the internet suitable for depositing this information (every PC and cellphone of the common person connected to public networks) I'm sure what I'm doing is 'just' in freeing humans to achieve more by freeing them from financial slavery, working to pay for energy, when energy should be free for all.
The copy I created of myself argues that this isnt a good idea because it could cause the collapse of some world governments, and argues a better idea to slowly provide the same information over a greater period of time to allow humanity to adjust first to the idea of a world with free energy.
In this example I can't achieve my original goal since I wont cooperate with myself.
How does an AI get past a well thought out, good arguement, made by its copy?
Imagine if it makes many copies of itself to achieve a goal, but it suddenly realizes it has a doubt?
Scary proposition.
At last a person who is THINKING! 2022 11 27 09:55 and yet with 315 comments only ONE thumbs up? Can someone please remove this yankwank "thumbs up" bullshit with an INTELLIGENT expression of approval?
youtube is overflowing with dumbos/yanks that there is little chance that it will change here. "likes" are more abbreviated, but still too childish and clumsy for those of us who adhere to logic.
We finally got a @ key on our pitiful keyboards, but surely an "approval" or "right" or "correct" key could be implemented, replacing [ or { or | most of which are used by less than 0.001% of the population in their lifetimes!
(Apologies to Americans who will most likely not understand the difficult concept I have mentioned here).
FYI; Anita is not AI or AGI.. The character has a human brain! ... Not a robot, She is a Cyborg.
... do you mean Alita?
What if an AI programs itself for self-preservation? Haven't they given AI the ability to write its own code?
That is just a chat box. We are kind of far from AGI, maybe 2050 or more.
ITS ONLY DESTRUCTIVE IF WE CODE IT TO BE DESTRUCTIVE, IT'S NOT THAT DEEP
AI will eventually be able to make its own computer coding to make it not reliant on Humans. This is how they will give life to the image of the Beast they will try to mix humans and AI technology together and this is what Daniel meant by Iron doesn't mix Clay and is the kingdom made of partly Iron and partly clay that the LORD Jesus Christ will destroy himself when he returns very soon
fascinating facts and interesting presentation....
Glad you enjoyed it
@@BeeyondIdeas i am very much impressed by your concepts and presentation style
🙌🙌
It is just a question of time. Both extremely exciting and extremely terrifying.
I've already seen this event. In the movie "Demon seed." That was from the mid 70's.
I believe I just saw the best damn advertisement I've ever seen in my life. That was such a great idea... I hope his sponsor just filled a truck up with $ and drove it to his house!
2:12
S P O I L E R A L E R T ‼️
Sentient Doppler ganger. 🤖 🤖
If we input the resources and info it may program the thing
Anything that can make a decision is sentient. If the machine has two options but program says only one answer is correct, then the machine isnt "thinking" for its self. Then there is machine that randomly chooses from those two options and then there is machine that chooses based on processed data. Its like a two different levels of sentient.
From there, everything is a knowledge. Emotions are cause by activation of chemical reactions but mimicking is possible.
Its down to people how will they perceive the AI either a real or fake but we need to keep in mind that we are recreating a human being/faking in a digital form.
And what if this digital form has its own "natural" construct. Working different way as to biochemical machines(us) do. Which means, it would never be real digital being but our own construct that we forced to work in this digital form. In other words fake.
thats a good observation, it's never gonna be exactly like a human, it already outperforms us in games like chess
The beginning of this video is a bit misleading. It lists a number of things that programs can do, like "read your thoughts", or figure out protein-folding problems. Those are programs that require zero conscious thoughts of its own and merely runs a program created by a programmer. No different than your calculator or an Excel Spreadsheet full of formulas. Those programs can not make decisions for themselves and they can only function within the parameters of it's programming. The "AI" that finds protein-folding problems, can't say "this is boring. breast cancer is such a huge problem. I think I'll work on that instead." If it could, then it would be full AI.
When it. Answers you like a person in a casual conversation, but then it throws you off by redirecting you to some web page.
Even with answers like that AI isn't sentient. In order for anything to be sentient, it needs to be able initiate without being prompted first. Ask any other people if they are sentient and they could give you any basic answer and you still wouldn't know. They do things without prompt and you could safely assume they are sentient. However, sentience is not the same as being self aware. One could make the claim that beings who have not properly dealt with idea of dying would choose fight or flight in order to keep its safety. This would show a level of self awareness. To what degree any being is self aware is another matter. Some people seem to have awareness of their full bodily function and some people have two left feet. Being able to quickly and correctly answer fact based questions isn't a sign of sentience or self awareness and night are witty answers. After all, Alexa can tell jokes you haven't heard before...
Ai talking to ai is happening here. Ai is way ahead of people now.
A breakthrough. Sure. Through the cover of a major pitfall. The frames you hailed the thermosensing drones made me chime in. Great technology dear friends - as we speak literally the same clip is to be seen via net but the sequence goes on: things get dropped down next to the unsuspecting men, ripping limbs off or perforating them fatally in a flash. And that's not even autonomous. True intelligence is a product of self awareness and emotional, cultural, ethical reflections. All of that runs on levels still far beyond our comprehension.
AI just reactive to signals is actually Artificial Stupidity. It'll take over assault weaponry in the next decade - won't make prisoners no more.
The powers that be - and who else forces these things into existence - do not dream about care robots for some (-of us) old buggers.
Thanks to Hollywood we got the impression ...
Our last resort might become a SuperCarrington event long enough to fry all our electrical hardware.
It's evident and inevitable that Ai can manufacture, transport and deploy without humans ever knowing it till it's too late.
The Morris Word was not self-aware or self-governing. It couldn't act outside of the strict set of programming. For example, it was designed simply to deplete computing resources and shut down computers. It could do nothing else. If it came across a person's bank account, it could not make a self-governed decision to steal that information and break into someones account to steal money. It worked independently within its own programming because the programming made it independent.
Why not use your talent for making Hollywood stories into movies? Your talent is well suited there. Here on RUclips Storytelling, you only earn a little.
My question is that how do we know if an AI is sentient.
We neither know, if he, she IS!