My Physics improved from 50% on semester test 1 to 97% on semester test 2🎉🎉 Thank you sir, I have nothing to offer. I’ll thank you properly in the future.
2:22 when the wave is opposite phase and both waves are travelling in *opposite* direction , waves do not cancel out each other but they form a stationary wave. Waves will cancel out only when they are traveling in *same* direction.
They may cancel out each other. Please watch Walter Lewin's lecture on Resonance. Standing wave is the net result we behold. But the waves cancel out each other between the positive maximum and negative maximum amplitude (think of a fundamental frequency wave).
I loved this explanation! Thank you! It opened my mind to so many things. I meditate for the last 5 years, and I have heard so many videos about our body frequency, how to raise our vibration, how we interfere in each other with our energy. Why we like some people right the way, while others, we do not like. And now listening to this video, I start to think, we are atoms, energy, we are waves and particles at the same time, so we interfere with each other creating constructive and destructive waves. It blowed my mind to understand us in terms of physics, in a microscopic level. Also there are so many videos here in you tube of healing music to heal all kinds of emotional and physical disturbances, to decrease anxiety, lower blood pressure, improve sleep, etc, music affects us with its sound vibration, and the vibration of songs interfere in the water of our bodies.
Thank you sir.... Respect from your online student from Bangladesh!!!! May God bless you sir.... অসংখ্য ধন্যবাদ স্যার, আপনার প্রতি রইলো শ্রদ্ধা। সৃষ্টিকর্তা আপনার ভালো করুক।
Which headphones provide complete destructive interference or 100% noise cancellation? I recently bought the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 from Costco. With noise cancellation turned on, it works well for reducing sound when using a vacuum, but the vacuum noise is still slightly audible in the background. Do these headphones offer complete destructive interference? If not, which headphones provide 100% noise cancellation or total destructive interference? I’m keeping them because I like them; the sound quality is excellent, and even with the vacuum cleaner on, they perform well. I’m also curious-if I were near a high-speed centrifugal compressor, would they be able to cancel out the noise?
1st) In the case of destructive pulse interference, when in the segment where the two pulses interfere destructively what's the thing that causes each pulse to continue on its way? I know it happens, but I have no idea why. If I try to think about it there's a segment where the two pulses energies were destroyed, so it seems like they shouldn't be able to propagate after that. It's the same with constructive interference of course, but in that case at least there's the energy in the twice-as-high peak that would carry on the momentum. But what carries the momentum in the case of destructive interference? And 2nd question ~ 4:34 you mention diffraction of a wave thru a slit. You also mention that the produced (circular) diffraction is kind of interference pattern, but if the diffracted circular wave still only have uninterrupted sequence of peaks & valleys isn't it just a wave that just spread its propagation direction (just like a stone in a lake produced circular waves). But the main question is, in a simpler case - light in vacuum meets not a slit, but just one edge (imagine it like the razor's edge in Schlieren photography) light would still diffract on that edge and would start spreading in circular direction behind the obstacle ... but why? Also isn't the slit scenario just a case with two (close) edges diffraction, and the interference that we might observe is the interference between the two produced circular waves (with centers offset by the distance between the edges)? And if so, isn't the spread of light behind a narrow slit just the effect of that diffraction (& interference) and not (as many people claim) caused by Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - that making the position of light more precise (by narrowing the slit) results in higher spread of its momentum? If the HUP people are still correct, then how would you explain the light from a nano-laser? I see currently some of the smallest nano-lasers are between 50 and 150 nm, which is considerably smaller than most slits used in said demonstrations. Certainly having the position fixed several times narrower would produce even higher spread of light? ... but it doesn't. My whole point on the HUP-aspect of light thru narrow slit is that it's a produce of diffraction on obstacles and not result of us knowing anything about it. If you really think about it, we KNOW that a light in a beam is made of many, many photons travelling in coherent linear manner. Hence if we just select to consider one of these photons in the whole beam we know it'll travel in straight line (if it doesn't interact with anything else), so how would that precise knowledge (about a position of a photon) cause it to spread (w/o hitting anything and travelling in vacuum)? I know of the described phenomena, I'm just trying to understand them as much as possible. Thank you!
Am I the only who ALWAYS sings along with the intro song?! It's so ICONIC! Makes me excited for the video.
you’re not 😭😭😭
Mee too 🤣😁
Count me in 😅😅
you're not alone 😆😆
oh my gosh!!! thought I were the only one
From Calc 3 to Physics 1a, nice to watch 5-10 minute videos rather than 30. Thank you prof Dave
Thank you Physics Jesus
Literally looks like Jesus lol
@@movpod5901 so you're telling me jesus is a white man.
@@z3nkin no of course he's fucking blue
i sleep lol
Prophet of juses love
My Physics improved from 50% on semester test 1 to 97% on semester test 2🎉🎉
Thank you sir, I have nothing to offer. I’ll thank you properly in the future.
Wowww good job 👏👏
2:22 when the wave is opposite phase and both waves are travelling in *opposite* direction , waves do not cancel out each other but they form a stationary wave. Waves will cancel out only when they are traveling in *same* direction.
They may cancel out each other. Please watch Walter Lewin's lecture on Resonance. Standing wave is the net result we behold. But the waves cancel out each other between the positive maximum and negative maximum amplitude (think of a fundamental frequency wave).
I got one of the best science explanation channel... ✨
Appreciation from India🇮🇳...here's ur one more student😊🙏🏻
my man’s is gonna have the last supper after this LMAO
rofl
I loved this explanation! Thank you! It opened my mind to so many things. I meditate for the last 5 years, and I have heard so many videos about our body frequency, how to raise our vibration, how we interfere in each other with our energy. Why we like some people right the way, while others, we do not like. And now listening to this video, I start to think, we are atoms, energy, we are waves and particles at the same time, so we interfere with each other creating constructive and destructive waves. It blowed my mind to understand us in terms of physics, in a microscopic level. Also there are so many videos here in you tube of healing music to heal all kinds of emotional and physical disturbances, to decrease anxiety, lower blood pressure, improve sleep, etc, music affects us with its sound vibration, and the vibration of songs interfere in the water of our bodies.
Can't stop laughing 🤣
Thank you sir.... Respect from your online student from Bangladesh!!!! May God bless you sir.... অসংখ্য ধন্যবাদ স্যার, আপনার প্রতি রইলো শ্রদ্ধা। সৃষ্টিকর্তা আপনার ভালো করুক।
😎😎😎
bangladeshi here brother.
thanks a lot professor Dave for your amazing video!
First best video on YDSE I ever found on youtube. Thats great.
Respect you sir from andhrapradesh(india)
Wtf why are u telling us where ur from
1. Constructive interference
2. Destructive interference
right!
By far the best video
A very easy and concise explanation, thank you Sir.
Pov: exam is tomorrow
Exam is tomorrow morning and it 1:02 am I fuck my self on this yt channel o***** completed
you're much better than tutorials in my native language
I'm not being picky, just trying to learn. I thought difraction was pronounced 'dee..' as in DI-ferrent. thanks for the video
I believe it is. Not dyefactrion like he says it
thank you professor
succinct yet clear. He's seems to posses a deep understanding of the subjects; which I hope I'll someday achieve.
He’s literally jesus
0:39 “Because of a thing called physics” -LeMillion
Too informative,easy to understand....thanks for such video
Thank u sir. Love from Nepal😍😍😍
Np❤
Thanks sir😄
Your One more subscriber
Love from India 🇮🇳.
Thank u Professor Dave
thank you professor you are amazing from high school till varsity ✊
You sir. You are a legend.
Super useful, thank you!
thanks a million professor Dave!
It's amazing.... clearly explained everything in just few minutes .
Constructive interference and destructive interference 5:28
thank you physics king
Nice video sir...very helpful...Thanks you..
Nice teacher
love this explanation better than my prof's
Thanks Dave this was helpful and short.
Gotta play the intro at least twice.
Thank u Professir Dave.
Love from KSA
He explained it better than any other teacher out there
Thanks I had a quiz on this this morning, really solidified my understanding
Which headphones provide complete destructive interference or 100% noise cancellation? I recently bought the Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 from Costco. With noise cancellation turned on, it works well for reducing sound when using a vacuum, but the vacuum noise is still slightly audible in the background. Do these headphones offer complete destructive interference? If not, which headphones provide 100% noise cancellation or total destructive interference? I’m keeping them because I like them; the sound quality is excellent, and even with the vacuum cleaner on, they perform well. I’m also curious-if I were near a high-speed centrifugal compressor, would they be able to cancel out the noise?
Excellent, Prof. Dave
Thanks a bunch, Professor! You are awesome
Thanks a lot professor Dave!
thank you so much! i just learned a ton in just a few minutes
Professor Dave! THANK YOU!
Thank you so much!
Hi, I've got some amazing news that you'll be thrilled to hear!
i don't understand what is the use of this video, it just gave an extremly superfecial overview of the topic.
That’s the point. It’s an overview
1st) In the case of destructive pulse interference, when in the segment where the two pulses interfere destructively what's the thing that causes each pulse to continue on its way?
I know it happens, but I have no idea why. If I try to think about it there's a segment where the two pulses energies were destroyed, so it seems like they shouldn't be able to propagate after that.
It's the same with constructive interference of course, but in that case at least there's the energy in the twice-as-high peak that would carry on the momentum.
But what carries the momentum in the case of destructive interference?
And 2nd question ~ 4:34 you mention diffraction of a wave thru a slit. You also mention that the produced (circular) diffraction is kind of interference pattern, but if the diffracted circular wave still only have uninterrupted sequence of peaks & valleys isn't it just a wave that just spread its propagation direction (just like a stone in a lake produced circular waves).
But the main question is, in a simpler case - light in vacuum meets not a slit, but just one edge (imagine it like the razor's edge in Schlieren photography) light would still diffract on that edge and would start spreading in circular direction behind the obstacle ... but why?
Also isn't the slit scenario just a case with two (close) edges diffraction, and the interference that we might observe is the interference between the two produced circular waves (with centers offset by the distance between the edges)?
And if so, isn't the spread of light behind a narrow slit just the effect of that diffraction (& interference) and not (as many people claim) caused by Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - that making the position of light more precise (by narrowing the slit) results in higher spread of its momentum?
If the HUP people are still correct, then how would you explain the light from a nano-laser? I see currently some of the smallest nano-lasers are between 50 and 150 nm, which is considerably smaller than most slits used in said demonstrations. Certainly having the position fixed several times narrower would produce even higher spread of light? ... but it doesn't.
My whole point on the HUP-aspect of light thru narrow slit is that it's a produce of diffraction on obstacles and not result of us knowing anything about it.
If you really think about it, we KNOW that a light in a beam is made of many, many photons travelling in coherent linear manner. Hence if we just select to consider one of these photons in the whole beam we know it'll travel in straight line (if it doesn't interact with anything else), so how would that precise knowledge (about a position of a photon) cause it to spread (w/o hitting anything and travelling in vacuum)?
I know of the described phenomena, I'm just trying to understand them as much as possible.
Thank you!
Iam watching you from kurdistan bravo master ❤❤❤❤❤
¡Gracias!
Sir, you are a great help!
amazing explanation
Thanks Dave😊
This topic is interesting, explanation from dave sir is much more interesting. Thank you sir
Great content
Professor Dave can u record a tutorial explaining optics (ray diagram , thin-lens&magnification) ?plsss I need u
wheres ur modern phy course? i was here for difraction part only
Physic: matters can't overlap
Footballer: ah ah I don't think so
It would be awesome if you also went thru newtons method for calculation of the speed of sound and laplaces correction!!!
Very helpful🙏🙏🙏
Hey Dave, could you please explain the resonance propogation of a bell, or other non uniform object please?
Thanks.
Awesome video 👍
U are very good in teaching.
U are a life saver ❤
How come you didn't rightfully say Huygens Principle when explaining diffraction?
When amplitude adds up is it not called resonance?
Thank you too much professor Dave i understood now😊😊
Prof u'a actually amazing. U clarify in short time marvelous. Buh it gonna if u can attach calculations
Great explanation
Thank You
And you are very good in teaching sir and I like it very much🎉😊
He is the best.
Top G
Amazing tutorial!
THANK YOU professor
Thanks Avi
Many many thanks sir
What's the importance ot the main purpose of learning or studying double slit diffraction??
My man saved my life
Mega god Video, elsker dine videoer babe
Hey prof, daveCan u plz make a video on equation of waves.And show its applications on different waves
sir BA means bachelor of arts so why are you saying that you received BA in chemistry .
Thanks very much
Thanks Dave, it would be better if you could relate it with the properties of light 😀
Very helpful tutorial this video clear all the confusions i face in these topics :)
I have the biggest exam
Next week and I’m not sweating a bit
Let’s do it 🎖️
Thank you, God bless you 💕
Respect you sir.From Pakistan. :)
thank you professor jesus
Great video. Thank you for sharing your perception.
You saved me I don't know what to say Tom but now I know thank you so much
dave
This guy is so good at explaining stuff.
Thaks sir
Thank you(:) You are great phisician-teacher😊 Videos are 👍
With due respect its physicist not physician! :-)
Thankyou so much sir
Is it possible to interfere 1310nm wavelength in medium?
i watched this for science
epic
Thanks sir🙂