@@wendypuliti1919That's exactly what he's saying. Chess is not solved, accuracy is how close your moves are to the strongest computer engines (for example, Stockfish)
There is noway for human or any forms of living including alien can solve chess, chess has more posibility than atoms in universe, that if a single chess position can stored in a single atom, by now it takes billions of atoms to store a single position, so yeah
Since chess is not solved, we can not calculate actual true accuracy. Right now, it depends on calculation methodology and stockfish depth.
that's stupid. the accuracy is how close your moves are to the computer.
@@wendypuliti1919That's exactly what he's saying. Chess is not solved, accuracy is how close your moves are to the strongest computer engines (for example, Stockfish)
There is noway for human or any forms of living including alien can solve chess, chess has more posibility than atoms in universe, that if a single chess position can stored in a single atom, by now it takes billions of atoms to store a single position, so yeah
That's a lie, it was not 100% accuracy, there were actually many mistakes there. Stop with the clickbait.
If I go to www.chess.com/events/2023-gct-superbet-poland-rapid-blitz/27/Carlsen_Magnus-Duda_Jan_Krzysztof it shows 100% to me. So no clickbait.
@@FunChessGames actually it was 92.4 for both chess GMs.
@@hungviet5435 If you log out, what does chess.com show you then?
@@FunChessGames "If you log out" That already says everything
@@FunChessGames what do you mean? it cant be 100% if magnus endgame had less pawn than the opponent
Click bait
This commentator is kinda annoying they are so cool no vibes ans exiting comments