Tap to unmute

The Incredibles 2 Is Still a Terrible Sequel - 8 Years Later

Share
Embed
  • Published on Apr 17, 2026

Comments •

  • @Jheff99
    @Jheff99  Month ago +1176

    What are the odds that Incredibles 3 will be any better than this one?

    • @SiyamthandaQwabe-or7er
      @SiyamthandaQwabe-or7er Month ago +15

      Is one confirmed?

    • @TopPostTv99
      @TopPostTv99 Month ago +55

      @SiyamthandaQwabe-or7er Yeah it's in the works, unfortunately.

    • @SiyamthandaQwabe-or7er
      @SiyamthandaQwabe-or7er Month ago +11

      @TopPostTv99lolllllll we’ll see how bad it is

    • @joaquinm9148
      @joaquinm9148 Month ago +190

      The only way Incredibles 3 can be any worse is if they introduce Incredible Gassy

    • @alejandrovelez6358
      @alejandrovelez6358 Month ago +116

      Especially now that the latest full trailer of Toy Story 5 released, it wants to try and fix the damage Toy Story 4 did to the characters while it’ll also just be recycling plots from the original trilogy, and making them nonsensically worse… This is like SW ROS trying to fix the irreparable damage done in TLJ, but only ended up making things worse…

  • @heropath34.vaselisc.35
    @heropath34.vaselisc.35 Month ago +9602

    eight years.... Oh my gosh

    • @vegetainvegetarian
      @vegetainvegetarian Month ago +851

      It’s been 8 years since a movie I waited my whole childhood for released… we’re old

    • @timothys5277
      @timothys5277 Month ago +49

      Truueee

    • @NealBones
      @NealBones Month ago +77

      It only gets worse from here🙃 the first time an album you remember releasing turns 20 is a trip.

    • @callmekensei2799
      @callmekensei2799 Month ago +29

      Time flys then you die

    • @81brassglass79
      @81brassglass79 Month ago +98

      Yeah it goes faster, buckle up make it count. Any fake friends ditch now. treasure the real ones.

  • @giboit.
    @giboit. Month ago +6571

    The original was also more of a spy movie rather than a super hero movie. Which explains the more mature themes and darker tone.

    • @emartin29
      @emartin29 Month ago +17

      This!

    • @viraticwars
      @viraticwars Month ago +412

      You beat me to it. It has more in common with 60's Bond movies than 60's superheroes.

    • @KingpenGames
      @KingpenGames Month ago +208

      Never realized this but I agree with it

    • @hob_channel
      @hob_channel Month ago +5

      Cap, massive cap

    • @thelasthellfish6719
      @thelasthellfish6719 Month ago +5

      Lol what? Not true, it def is a superhero movie more than a spy one

  • @Warclam
    @Warclam Month ago +640

    Brad Bird: How can I make a sequel? I had a story to tell with the Parr family, and I told it. I don't have another story to tell.
    Executives: Then tell it again.

    • @zerosumforty
      @zerosumforty 20 days ago +31

      Ironically this could have worked. BUT NOT WITH THE SAME FKING FAMILY WHAT THE HELL

    • @CST1992
      @CST1992 18 days ago +11

      I'm seriously disappointed in Bird. A director of his caliber, given all that time and *this* is what he came up with?

    • @alejandrovelez6358
      @alejandrovelez6358 7 days ago +8

      @CST1992 That’s not Brad’s fault. This is to blame the Disney executives for cutting out an entire year of production in favor of Toy Story 4, so The Incredibles 2 instead got pulled to be released a year early, which was an error on their part because that didn’t give Brad Bird enough time to complete it the way he wanted. So this goes to show that even if you have the same talented directors that made the original movie, that doesn’t mean it’ll stop executives from screwing up the creative visions of said directors and producers…

  • @batteriesnotincluded4734
    @batteriesnotincluded4734 Month ago +5519

    There is no Incredibles 2
    There is no Megamind 2
    There is no Queen of England
    - Titan

  • @JazzSicaa
    @JazzSicaa Month ago +1684

    Unironically the biggest and only cultural impact The Incredibles 2 ever had was the "Mr Incredible uncanny" meme and that's it.

    • @ShinGhidorah17
      @ShinGhidorah17 Month ago +81

      Sometimes, there is SOME good in overall bad things.
      Like this meme, for example.
      That doesn’t stop them from being bad, though.

    • @KenyonTess-zk3et
      @KenyonTess-zk3et Month ago +239

      Don’t forget the “math is math” meme

    • @Mattrattmattratt
      @Mattrattmattratt Month ago +117

      And the Violet nose-spit meme

    • @hypernova_glacier
      @hypernova_glacier Month ago +110

      ​@Mattrattmattratt Nah, that one was meme bait. Math is math and uncanny mr incredible are legit tho

    • @djivangrigoryan
      @djivangrigoryan Month ago +8

      Incredible 2 is like an 8 and 1 is a 10

  • @JasonRasmussen
    @JasonRasmussen Month ago +219

    I'm so sick of the hidden villain trope that modern Disney and Pixar keep repeating.

    • @DAVIDALBERTOMEJIACABRERA
      @DAVIDALBERTOMEJIACABRERA Month ago

      Cof cof Pawbert

    • @souzasamonji1521
      @souzasamonji1521 Month ago +7

      @DAVIDALBERTOMEJIACABRERA exception to rule, most of the plot twist villains are still sucky

    • @Mothbean
      @Mothbean 20 days ago +31

      King Candy was, and always will be, the best twist villain ever made. So many twist villains suck because you only get to see them _as a villain_ during the final act. King Candy is a bad guy throughout the entire film, with the twist being about who he actually is.

    • @theriddlersunderwear
      @theriddlersunderwear 13 days ago

      @DAVIDALBERTOMEJIACABRERA He's not as bad I feel. Because you're immediately like "oh he's evil" then when he comes back and is helping and seems really genuine you think you were wrong, only for him to turn out to be evil all along. Plus the added fact that his family also didn't know he was going to double-cross Judy.

    • @cheaperthanu
      @cheaperthanu 11 days ago +1

      @Mothbeanagreed, wreck it Ralph did it best. Which is sad that it also has a disappointingly bad sequel

  • @windowserror.404
    @windowserror.404 Month ago +2909

    "fortnite characters" is an elite insult

  • @VOLDGAMER-m7d5e
    @VOLDGAMER-m7d5e Month ago +1632

    the "math is math" joke is all i remember from this movie

    • @AFanOfCinema
      @AFanOfCinema Month ago +48

      And Jack-Jack fighting the Raccoon.

    • @VOLDGAMER-m7d5e
      @VOLDGAMER-m7d5e Month ago +81

      @AFanOfCinema nope, i forgot about that too until you mentioned it

    • @barbarabaker1457
      @barbarabaker1457 Month ago +18

      I liked the parts like that, but it did feel hollow, even if it had charm.

    • @Ikiagain
      @Ikiagain 29 days ago +6

      Went into my vocabulary, other than that I couldn’t tell you what happened in detail
      Dash running across the water > incredibles 2

    • @ForiamStudios
      @ForiamStudios 28 days ago +5

      @VOLDGAMER-m7d5eI’m still struggling to remember it

  • @KennyHavoc
    @KennyHavoc Month ago +269

    Screenslaver infuriated me because it’s the 60’s, who has more than two tvs in their house let alone screens everywhere they go?

    • @coltonphibbs1390
      @coltonphibbs1390 25 days ago +24

      I’m embarrassed that I never picked up on that until this comment lol

    • @KennyHavoc
      @KennyHavoc 24 days ago +18

      @coltonphibbs1390the movie wanted to be right after but also didn’t want to acknowledge when that time period would be. Just a travesty of a film fr

    • @seanrrr
      @seanrrr 24 days ago +46

      I've only seen this movie once, but when I did I completely forgot that it was set in the 60s. Everything about it feels modern.

    • @KennyHavoc
      @KennyHavoc 24 days ago +12

      @seanrrrthey didn’t stop to think about anything other than, we’re gonna make money making a sequel

    • @jamalwalker04
      @jamalwalker04 15 days ago

      Tech is clearly different in-universe. In the first film Bob is working with a clearly 80s-style computer, they have video cameras, VHS, and the Parr family have multiple tv's in their home.
      ​@KennyHavoc

  • @lillordakira9752
    @lillordakira9752 Month ago +1898

    I realized that the second movie has a lower body count and overall less violence than the first movie.

    • @youcantbeatk7006
      @youcantbeatk7006 Month ago +56

      One of the dumbest things in the sequel to me is when Helen shoots a flare gun at Evelyn's oxygen tank deliberately and that creates a massive explosion that rips metal and shoots Evelyn out the plane and somehow Evelyn with no real powers survives that, and Helen tries to save Evelyn after that as if she didn't deliberately try to kill her.

    • @PandaFury-Goku
      @PandaFury-Goku Month ago

      It feels like many modern movies lean heavily into themes and tones that I would describe as more emotionally driven or “feminized,” and as a result, they sometimes lack the grit, toughness, or traditionally masculine energy that older films often had. There also seems to be a strong push toward particular social perspectives, including LGBTQ+ representation, which can make some films feel agenda-driven rather than purely story-focused. Because of that, it can feel harder to find movies that prioritize strong storytelling, complex characters, and organic themes over messaging.

    • @VLFBERHTwolf
      @VLFBERHTwolf Month ago +89

      Basically broke the fire rule about sequels. Bigger, better, bolder. And it could have been done here in The Incredibles 2.

    • @Raidcruise
      @Raidcruise Month ago +239

      Syndrome killed so many people, and was quick to do it. Screenslaver didn’t kill anyone and let a lot of characters live when she’d benefit from killing then despite not caring about them.

    • @omni-hexagon3514
      @omni-hexagon3514 Month ago +129

      I remember thinking the sequel was feeling weirdly toothless while watching it in theaters, but then the climax happened and it all crystalized. If it'd happened in the first movie, Evelyn getting shot in the chest with a flare while wearing an oxygen system and going through a plane's windshield would've absolutely killed her. Might have even had a grim gag of burning chunks of her raining down around the family.

  • @TemplarAzrael
    @TemplarAzrael Month ago +4648

    Real fans know that Rise of the Underminer for Xbox and Ps2 is the true sequel to the first movie

    • @jimmygarza8896
      @jimmygarza8896 Month ago +8

      Is it any different from the GCN version?

    • @hassankhan-jg1dx
      @hassankhan-jg1dx Month ago

      This mfer knows Ball

    • @SparkpadArt
      @SparkpadArt Month ago +9

      @jimmygarza8896 Well, the GBA version is VERY different from the console games.

    • @jimmygarza8896
      @jimmygarza8896 Month ago +5

      ​@SparkpadArtGCN, not GBA.

    • @SparkpadArt
      @SparkpadArt Month ago +5

      ​@jimmygarza8896I know, but the handheld games are worth mentioning too.

  • @JoshuaLauritzen
    @JoshuaLauritzen 22 days ago +47

    they should've made a prequel instead of a second movie, that would've been nice

  • @TobyTheKoraidon393
    @TobyTheKoraidon393 Month ago +2500

    Incredibles 2 honestly feels like a direct to DVD sequel rather than a big budget sequel to the classic Brad Bird flick.

    • @randomannoyance
      @randomannoyance Month ago +78

      direct to dvd sounds like such an archaic term for something that was a normal thing less than two decades ago

    • @LeotheJapaneseLion9890
      @LeotheJapaneseLion9890 Month ago +20

      ​@randomannoyance Maybe it's because you don't really see people watching movies on dvd as much as in the 2000's anymore.

    • @Itsbritney94
      @Itsbritney94 Month ago

      @randomannoyancedirect to streaming movie, kinda like a Disney plus film if you want

    • @MBwolt
      @MBwolt Month ago +71

      to me it felt like an extended episode of a hypothetical The Incredibles series. The stakes were so low...

    • @67tedward
      @67tedward Month ago +17

      Yeah it has similar vibes to the disney princess movie sequels that disney liked to churn out in the 2000s tbh

  • @TylerBR97
    @TylerBR97 Month ago +3210

    “It’s made for kids” is the most infuriating defense on planet Earth

    • @Magikarp-4ever
      @Magikarp-4ever Month ago +97

      @TylerBR97 as though kids are retarded or deserve stupid entertainment and are stupid themselves, newsflash kids aren't stupid lmao they are fucking far more clever and can follow along far more than most anyone thinks unless ofc you have kids
      So yeah absolutely spot on dude it's the worst excuse, how much adult stuff do kids watch because they can follow along and love it and it's certainly not made for kids, Marvel isn't made for kids per sé and they can follow along with a gazillion movies lol saying they don't deserve well crafted entertainment is insulting

    • @AltheaWartman
      @AltheaWartman Month ago +92

      Exactly it doesnt excuse lazy writing. Kids arent stupid

    • @phousefilms
      @phousefilms Month ago +16

      Me(Remembers the first one): "So...whats the excuse now?"
      Seriously. Number one is one of the best twist villain reveals I've ever seen done. It's the right level of dark and adult. A LOT of supers murdered to make the Omnidroid doesn't feel like a kids movie. The hints at Bob cheating(when its just him going to do superhero things)as well as the midlife crisis is NOT a kids movie. Helen telling her kids that the soldiers on Nomanisan will murder them if they get a chance...it just was so much better.
      I know Syndrome is not a slow burn like Waternoose or Ernesto De La Cruz, but its, again, a great twist. Buddy is not what I was expecting to be the main villain, but the fact that he's a brilliant technology expert when he's a child leads up to the reveal on the Omnidroid. It feels like they tried to make us overall forget that Syndrome...happened in 2. They don't really talk about him or the effect he had on the supers at all(seriously, dozens, at least what we see, killed off to perfect the Omnidroid). There's a deleted scene(in concept, but unfinished)that has a memorial for Gazerbeam. With so many supers destroyed, it would make it interesting and heartwarming to see that there were some remaining in the scene where Helen meets the new supers(Voyd, Screech, Brick, etc;) But it overall seemed brushed over.

    • @dearthofdoohickeys4703
      @dearthofdoohickeys4703 Month ago +126

      It’s especially infuriating because good stories matter EVEN more when it’s for kids.

    • @nebulous9280
      @nebulous9280 Month ago +172

      The worst part about it is that it not only belittles children and their ability to understand complex stories, it outright STUNTS their ability to understand complex stories. If you raise your kids on boring, oversimplified nonsense, YOU ARE RAISING A MORON. They NEED to be challenged with more complex ideas that push them to think in creative ways to figure out what's going on. I loved watching movies as a kid BECAUSE it was fun to find the plot lines and little details in order to figure out and predict the story before it happened. Those skills in deduction and reasoning quite literally help me navigate social interactions and understanding REAL peoples' motivations. I can step back and say "Hmmm, maybe they're acting like this because of something else, I should give them some grace." vs. "They were mean so I hate them now." Maybe a bit overexaggerated, but that is quite literally the difference between an adult and a child. Don't treat children like they'll always be immature and stupid. RAISE them into mature, intelligent adults.

  • @mitchellgiles6869
    @mitchellgiles6869 Month ago +235

    Evelyn was such an obvious twist villain that I thought they were going to fake us out and have her secretly be one of the few good people in a world of deception... Nope.

    • @joshslater2426
      @joshslater2426 Month ago +23

      I didn’t see it coming the first time, but her name is “Evil Endeavour” so it was pretty obvious.

    • @Aego384
      @Aego384 20 days ago +18

      ​@joshslater2426 I thought her brother was gonna be the villain. He seemed shady.

    • @Abbanellie
      @Abbanellie 19 days ago +10

      ​@Aego384 he was set up for the audience to think he was the twist villain lol

    • @jessehamm3573
      @jessehamm3573 18 days ago +9

      My thoughts exactly.
      When I first saw the film, I initially reflected to myself, "C'mon, she's too obvious. It's gotta be somebody else, right?"

    • @Cyandos
      @Cyandos 17 days ago +4

      I thought it would be both Deavor siblings

  • @fistbump4403
    @fistbump4403 Month ago +1668

    He’s lying. He must be lying. There is No Way it’s been 8 YEARS!

  • @FastCarsNoRules220
    @FastCarsNoRules220 Month ago +2023

    8 years ago was 2009: 😌
    8 years ago was 2018: 😳

  • @whowantswaffles
    @whowantswaffles 26 days ago +31

    Im glad im not the only one who saw Evelyn and went "that'll be the villain" immediately

  • @inkdomain314
    @inkdomain314 Month ago +1480

    Helen's monologue to Violet and Dash in the first film where she tells them the true danger of the people they're up against is such a great moment that stuck with me as a kid. Hearing adults won't care if you're a kid was great, and films that kids watch rarely treat them like they're not stupid

    • @UltiNullifierr
      @UltiNullifierr Month ago +160

      You forgot to mention the immediate speech after that, Violet runs to her mom before she leaves and Elastigirl in the most healthiest parent way ever apologizes to Violet and tells her that she was wrong to expect Violet to be able to put a shield on the plane that time.
      But that doesn’t mean Vi can’t do it, She doubles down that when the time is right She’ll know what to do.
      It’s such an earnest conversation it rlly stuck with me

    • @Man77772
      @Man77772 Month ago +73

      @UltiNullifierrHelen realizes that out of the three, she’s the only one who truly understands her own limits and capabilities. She fought with her powers for years, but dash and violet didn’t get that same chance. She understands that she can’t expect them to fight on the same level that she at first thought they could.

    • @UltiNullifierr
      @UltiNullifierr Month ago +18

      @Man77772and this understanding rlly pays off cuz u get to see how proud she is of Violet after the final house attack from syndrome, they just have a rlly heartwarming relationship displayed nicely it was great.

    • @bitwize
      @bitwize Month ago +37

      When my mom, sister, and I were on a road trip and lost, my mom thrust a Rand McNally road map into my hands and asked "OK, where are we?" When I told her I didn't know she yelled "You should know! Read the damn map! They teach you that in school, don't they?" She apologized later and we laughed about the "read the damn map" incident for decades afterward. I think of it when I see the bits with Helen and Violet on the plane. When the pressure is on sometimes a parent forgets to be understanding of their child's limitations and lack of knowledge/competence to perform under pressure.

    • @genericname2747
      @genericname2747 Month ago +19

      I think what also helps it stick in your mind is that we aren't just told this, we're shown it. Like, it'd be a LOT less memorable if the bad guys hadn't just blown up their airplane, in front of Bob no less.

  • @KatieTheEGirl
    @KatieTheEGirl Month ago +836

    Missed The Opportunity Of Saying Frozone Is The 'Cool Uncle' While Describing The Families Dynamic

  • @zoeotaku758
    @zoeotaku758 Month ago +31

    they just announced a 3rd movie😭😭

    • @zamira9642
      @zamira9642 19 days ago

      How is that going to work

    • @moonshoesthecat7277
      @moonshoesthecat7277 19 days ago

      They should go the Batman Beyond direction with it

    • @KingTea2006
      @KingTea2006 18 days ago +5

      Ngl tho, hopefully they do something Brad actually wanted to do for num 3. Focus on the characters. Just do a time skip and tell stories of the kids and kinda ignore what happened in num 2

  • @koji6745
    @koji6745 Month ago +2150

    The worldbuilding is also really weird here becuase it doesnt feel like the same world anymore?
    Doesnt feel like a retro-futurist 60s it just feels like 2005

    • @DankHank41
      @DankHank41 Month ago +1

      I'm laughing

    • @Boltscrap
      @Boltscrap Month ago +303

      Tbf, I always felt the first one was early 2000s with just some sixties visual flair. Bob uses a computer at work, VHS recording camera is a small plot point, during the Mirage contacts Mr Incredible for first time scene Bob claims to be watching TV in his room, implying having multiple TVs in a single house which is common for turn of the century, luxurious for sixties. As a kid the movie felt contemporary

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +16

      You mean 2018?

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +169

      ​​@Boltscrap this is what I always thought. The Incredibles universe always came across as a dystopia future where average people have typical 90s/early 2000s tech like flip phones and computers and fashion like raglan shirts and button downs but had outdated cars and homes, while the rich had futuristic tech like robots, tablets, hovercraft and jetpacks

    • @Eli-akad
      @Eli-akad Month ago +116

      The 2nd movie felt more like it took place in 2017-2018 not 2005😂

  • @FreddyJoe1002
    @FreddyJoe1002 Month ago +743

    Basically the main issue with the incredible films is that the first one is E for Everyone and the sequel is K for kids

    • @e-specter20
      @e-specter20 Month ago +4

      Don't insult kids like that, they're half the reason why everyone loved the first film

    • @penntopaper9305
      @penntopaper9305 Month ago +8

      @e-specter20 no they mean literally as in what the film was going for. “E for Everyone” and “K for Kids” are real ratings but for video games instead of movies

    • @e-specter20
      @e-specter20 Month ago

      ​@penntopaper9305 God, that's just so... stupid

    • @JustSomeKittenwithaGun
      @JustSomeKittenwithaGun Month ago +1

      Umm films don't use ESRB game rating system. E for everyone also includes anyone ages 6 and up, which means most kids. There is no K rating. EC or early childhood was temporarily used. What you meant to say was maybe PG and G. 🫩

    • @jayshroomalt
      @jayshroomalt 20 days ago

      @JustSomeKittenwithaGun No, they meant to say E and K. I'm sure they're aware of the G/PG/PG-13/R rating scale just as everyone else is. E and K is just a very obvious way of saying The Incredibles was a film that was made for everyone to watch including kids, and The Incredibles 2 was a film that was made for only kids.

  • @Canadiansamurai
    @Canadiansamurai 12 days ago +4

    I hated that they just undid all of Violet's character development in the sequel.

  • @alang.bandala8863
    @alang.bandala8863 Month ago +1325

    0:05 Funfact, The Incredibles is preserved in the National Film Registry as one of the films to be preserved in history. Alongside with Toy Story, Wall-e and Shrek.

    • @heftyordinanceindividual4015
      @heftyordinanceindividual4015 Month ago +50

      Cant believe they forgot the unforgettable piece of film history known as Home on the Range (2004)

    • @Ryan2K900
      @Ryan2K900 Month ago +9

      @heftyordinanceindividual4015What’d you do with uncle slim!?

    • @ldking5132
      @ldking5132 Month ago +3

      ​@heftyordinanceindividual4015 memories man.

    • @oogskskfn
      @oogskskfn Month ago +55

      Interesting how all the animated films are Pixar save for shrek. Totally no financial incentive there 👀👀👀

    • @AdaLovelace-z8s
      @AdaLovelace-z8s Month ago +47

      High chance that Puss in Boots: The Last Wish and Shrek 2 will probably be added too in the next few years because of how influential both were to pop culture.

  • @nikthenerd
    @nikthenerd Month ago +812

    Brad Bird said “you want your Incredibles sequel, here’s your fucking Incredibles sequel” and even encoded his belief about people wanting simulated experiences into the movie.

    • @JonAmorim
      @JonAmorim Month ago +81

      OMG, that makes sense. I thought the same about Matrix Resurrection.

    • @jeremytitus9519
      @jeremytitus9519 Month ago +72

      ​@JonAmorim and I have contempt for them both. Coulda just not made the thing. Instead, they made a crap thing, on purpose.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +61

      Well, Brad had a script for his original plans but Disney didnt want that smh

    • @nikthenerd
      @nikthenerd Month ago +47

      @jeremytitus9519imagine making a near perfect movie and people still bug you for a sequel because they just want more more more. I understand wanting more from the Incredibles universe but people can’t leave well enough alone. Plus Disney is gonna go for the money.

    • @trainknut
      @trainknut Month ago +39

      @nikthenerd Doesn't make it any less childish to intentionally sabotage your own franchise.

  • @beansbeansbeans2961
    @beansbeansbeans2961 Month ago +26

    It’s a shame they didn’t just age up the family like, 10 or 15 years into the future. Like, they already figured out their family dynamic for this phase of their life, but what about when the kids are more independent or even start families of their own? How cool would it have been if Violet married a non-superhero guy and her kid didn’t inherit powers? That’s a new dynamic I’d like to see work out. What about Dash going to college and only scraping by on sports scholarships and waking up a literal minute before all his classes, speeding to each one, rushing through everything, and still feeling like he’s failing? Jack Jack was a huge question mark in the first movie, and I would have loved to see who he would’ve turned out to be as the last teen in the house with his aging parents. Jack Jack could’ve gone through a similar arc that Violet went through in the first film as he tries to figure out his powers, but it wouldn’t have felt cheap, because he was a literal BABY when the first movie happened. He didn’t have the adventure. And maybe part of his arc could also mirror some of what his dad went through in the first movie. Feeling left out from the family lore and maybe also kept from new adventures because “he isn’t ready yet”, Jack Jack sneaks off to do under the table superhero stuff to prove himself. As the youngest sibling in my family, I’ve felt the same emotions, just in a non-super way, and younger me would have loved to have seen this type of inner conflict represented in Jack Jack. Lastly, don’t even get me STARTED on how EASY the elderly Helen and Bob jokes could’ve been to make. If the drama with the kids ever gets too much, you could cut to Bob woefully remarking on how pitiful it is that he can’t lift trains anymore and has to settle for just dead lifting the family minivans. You could cut to Helen doing yoga to stay limber, and her stretches are taking up the entire lawn. Aside from funny stuff, they’d also have to wrestle with the fact that soon, they’ll be empty nesters. It’d be so cute and funny to see the Incredibles trying to schedule their heists and their super villain fights around Violet’s husband’s work party, Dash’s mid-terms and Jack Jack’s promposal. Because at the end of the day, that’s what the Incredibles are about. It’s about real family conflicts and victories exaggerated with the gimmick of superpowers. The fact that we don’t like the second movie, I think, is because it switched the main conflict away from the family conflict and onto boring superhero conflicts. Ugh… such a missed opportunity.

  • @dudleymq
    @dudleymq Month ago +582

    I absolutely hated the character design for the new supers, they just didn't look like they belonged in the same world. I'm glad you mentioned this!

    • @genericname2747
      @genericname2747 Month ago +46

      None of the movie feels like its in the same world! Where'd all this high tech stuff come from???? I thought this was the 80s?????

    • @seanrrr
      @seanrrr 24 days ago +26

      They weren't even human beings. Like one is straight up an owl???

    • @bemiatto67
      @bemiatto67 3 hours ago

      ​@seanrrr it *could* work, but his design doesn't fit at all with the designs of Supers in the first. Owl guy would be cool as a villain imo

  • @rickgoodman4629
    @rickgoodman4629 Month ago +466

    “Not made for 4 year olds”
    What’s ironic is that I was 4 years old when my mom took me to see it and I LOVED that movie even then 💀

    • @spectre9340
      @spectre9340 Month ago +26

      There is a difference between _Kung Fu Panda_ which can be viewed by 4 year olds
      and _Kung Fu Panda 3 and 4_ which can only be viewed by 4 year olds

    • @atomail6334
      @atomail6334 Month ago +2

      That's not what ironic means

    • @joshslater2426
      @joshslater2426 Month ago +1

      It was one of my favourite of the Pixar films when I was young, along with Finding Nemo and the first two Cars films. I didn’t realise how dark it was until later on, so it didn’t stop me enjoying it.

    • @souzasamonji1521
      @souzasamonji1521 Month ago +1

      Same, I was a 4 year old kid in the cinema, and had my 5th birthday to be themed on the Incredibles
      as an adult today at 26 years old, I can appreciate the movie much better, than as a kid who just enjoyed colorful animation on screen

  • @exsperence
    @exsperence Month ago +10

    I don’t rly blame Brad bird tbh for years he claimed he had no story to tell then told no story for millions of dollars he told the truth and got paid

  • @Minetendo_Fan
    @Minetendo_Fan Month ago +547

    0:58 How did I never notice that their powers are actually metaphors for who they are

    • @FeraliAlie
      @FeraliAlie Month ago +63

      You're right, this movie keeps aging better and better

    • @sweethistortea
      @sweethistortea Month ago +53

      Good writing.

    • @melaspinkangel
      @melaspinkangel Month ago +15

      literally. such a good movie

    • @bethanyh1637
      @bethanyh1637 Month ago +11

      They're a slight shuffling of the Fantastic Four, which did the exact same thing with their characters. In fact, the Incredibles was lazy with the metaphor, because in F4, Mrs Fantastic had to grow as a character to earn her force field powers, while Violet had them for no reason.

    • @porkchopTopHat
      @porkchopTopHat Month ago +1

      He’s just making stuff up. They’re not metaphors

  • @jonathanplooij3666
    @jonathanplooij3666 Month ago +283

    i still can't believe they cut the gazerbeam scene from incredibles 2

    • @ratswam
      @ratswam Month ago +32

      Same, like wtf were they smoking on?

    • @Waterwraith1
      @Waterwraith1 Month ago +29

      Corporate: I'm sorry, how does this scene help improve the marketability for that baby? Get rid of it and throw in some baby shenanigans instead. The number crunchers tell us that if we focus in on the cuteness of the baby we can sell more product of it.

  • @wearenixx5833
    @wearenixx5833 19 days ago +6

    25:25 I think something that you might have missed, was it not only can be interpreted that Helen thought his life was in danger, but that she believed he was having an affair with another woman. The montage scene of him working out getting in shape and overall becoming a happier person and loving husband/father, was perceived by Helen that he was seeing someone else that fulfilled him more when she finds out he's been lying later on, even finding a hair on his clothing. As a kid that kind of stuff can go over your head especially with how subtly they play the idea in the movie, if it was today I think they'd treat the audience like we are stupid and literally say it to us, or just not even entertain that concept in a "kids movie"

  • @hugowigenstam7608
    @hugowigenstam7608 Month ago +93

    Even as a kid, I understood that the ending wasn't setting up for a sequel, but rather that it showed that their lives as super heroes go on beyond the movie.

  • @user-ox4nb6eb7v
    @user-ox4nb6eb7v Month ago +646

    Have a time skip where the kids are trying to be heroes on their own. Have the family drama of the kids having different conflicting ideals, too high of expectations from Dad etc
    Or get real bold and make on of the siblings to choose villainy. Either would've been better than what we got

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +107

      The first paragraph was literally Brad Bird's original script when the movie was supposed to come out in the early 2010s but Disney did the same BS they did with the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy: make a kiddy MCU ripoff that completely ignores the plot of the predecessor and destroys all of the legacy characters

    • @viraticwars
      @viraticwars Month ago +4

      This. Yes.

    • @mrviking2mcall212
      @mrviking2mcall212 Month ago +70

      Imagine a 5-10 year old Jack-Jack getting so cocky with his powers that he becomes a villain. Like a PG Brightburn. And then at the end of course, he gets humbled and rejoins the family.

    • @fishjones4618
      @fishjones4618 Month ago +17

      That would have made better sense. Craig T Nelson and Holly Hunter sounded 14 years older because it WAS 14 years between the two films.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +5

      ​@fishjones4618 Sarah Vowell also sounded older too

  • @Brofurony
    @Brofurony Month ago +33

    16:22 The reason you (and some of us including me) see the new designs of all old characters worse in this movie is because when the Increbles was being made, the design team and brad bird were limited by the technology at the time, and put effort into making the characters extremely stylised and sharp, all following geometrically satifying shapes to make them look unique and not not fall into toy story 1 uncannyness.
    The second movie makes it feel like the designers ignored all of that and just made them look all as "realistic" as possible, ignoring the design shapes and geometry that gave increbles 1 its signature look and style. Essentially just rounding out everything, losing all the design features that made the characters appealing to begin with

    • @jamesrichards2720
      @jamesrichards2720 25 days ago

      The new characters dont even look human in incredibles 2. They look like monsters.

    • @jatzi1526
      @jatzi1526 3 days ago

      Limitations drive creativity. All animation has gotten worse as technology has gotten better. Yes if you pump enough effort and money into something you can end up with the Spiderverse movies or something on that level. But overall on average 80s and 90s anime just looks better imo.

  • @try-w5s
    @try-w5s Month ago +723

    Mr incredible was so smart in the first film, he defeated ai, he managed to cleverly infiltrate syndromes base always used the element of surprise on his enemies avoided detection by advanced technologies, and all sorts.
    In the sequel he doesn't understand that the the phrase elephant in the room, is just that a phrase, whenever someone argues with him he just bumbles over his words despite the fact that in the first film he was perfectly good at verbal sparring, when he fights in the climax he telegraphs his movements, and at the start of the film he loudly announces his presence to the underminer.
    I LOVE IT WHEN CHARACTERS WHO ARE KNOWN TO BE SMART ACT STUPID IN MY STORIES LOVE IT.

    • @IcenLight
      @IcenLight Month ago +82

      He also didn't know what combustion meant, referring to Jack Jack's fire powers.

    • @kaydgaming
      @kaydgaming Month ago +86

      Flanderized before we even really got to see him in his prime

    • @splicedbread
      @splicedbread Month ago +39

      The current year (8 years ago) isn't allowed to have a positive father role figure after their personal development in the first film.
      Stupid fathers are enforced from now on.

    • @dokaasbeRhD9Y9BpH
      @dokaasbeRhD9Y9BpH Month ago +23

      @splicedbread which is a shame because, having Helen as a main lead, offers a fresh perspective and could’ve been explored properly without making him stupid so she can appear superior. at least when family guy does this, its supposed to be satirical

    • @zillycat8534
      @zillycat8534 Month ago +4

      Ikr, I swear did the writer make this all bad on purpose??
      If it’s the same writer, I wouldn’t be surprised, though yet again he may have been forced into things from Disney

  • @Butterism
    @Butterism Month ago +1580

    The home invasion sequence is so stupid. And there's such an easy fix too! Have Evelyn's parents die in a public super villain attack. That's why her dad was so sure Mr. Incredible would still come and save the day. Because he taught both of his children that heroes would always do the right thing regardless of the personal cost to themselves. And that ban would never stop them from helping.
    But it did.
    Her parents died, still waiting for a hero to save them. And while Evelyn is bitter, she reluctantly accepts that all heroes went underground due to the law changes.
    That is, of course, until the Incredibles, Mr. Incredible, comes out of hiding. And she's not happy about it. She's mad. The bitterness swells again. Because why did Mr.Incredible suddenly think it was worth it to come out now and not for his old friend? The one who helped campaigned for heroes back in the day.
    Evelyn is supposed to be a hacker and super smart. So have her hack into Syndrome's old files. Imagine her rage when she finds out Bob didn't become Mr. Incredible again because he wanted to help people. He did it out of ego. Everything about what her dad told her about heroes would seem like a lie. To her, her parents died not because of respecting the laws, but because Bob didn't see it as glamorous enough. So it wasn't worth the risk.
    That infuriates Evelyn. Instead of superheroes still being illegal in the sequel, have it be in an in-between. The court of public opinion is changing and law enforcement are starting to let heroes assist, but no law has been officialized yet.
    This is where Evelyn comes in. She doesn't want heroes to come back because she doesn't want to fuel their egos. And she's been helping make gear to help law enforcement stop the occasional super villain. Though those were starting to get rare. Heroes coming back means people regress into letting a select few handle problems.
    So she works in the background to help remind the people exactly why heroes were outlawed to begin with. Excessive property damage. Acting as if they're morally right. No real checks and balances. Their very existence inviting villains to rise and challenge them.
    She makes sure that the Incredibles missions always go badly. Heck, we can have her hire villains to increase damages. I'm not sure, I just want the Screenslaver to be a real villain.
    EDIT!
    I just thought of this, but I think I have a solid reason why Bob didn't go and help. As soon as he saw what was happening on the news, Bob wanted to go. Not because this would be a good chance to put heroes back in a good light, but because innocent people were going to die. Because his friend Mr. Dever was one of the hostages.
    But Bob was actually on one of his last strikes. He's been one of the last heroes resistant to the ban. But Agent Rick made it clear that if Bob stepped out of line again, he wouldn't be able to shield him from the consequences this time. Bob would be going to federal prison.
    Helen and Bob are going back and forth at this point with Helen physically blocking Bob from leaving the house. When Helen reminds Bob of what Rick said and implores him to let law enforcement handle it, Bob says he doesn't care. He's not gonna sit by and watch innocent people get hurt when he can do something about it.
    Helen goes still and then asks if he would sit by and watch his family go on without him. Bob asks what she means, and Helen reveals that she's pregnant. Bob is in disbelief.
    Helen then gives somewhat of an ultimatum. Saying that this is bigger than them now. They're about to have a family, and for her, hero life won't be more important than that. Bob goes to grab her shoulders and says that a family with Helen is the most important thing to him. Helen just asks, "is it?"
    Bob filters through several emotions. Joy of the pregnancy, apprehension for the future mixed with excitement, grief of what he's giving up, anger on why he has too, before settling on determination of a choice made. Helen let's him go through all of it.
    Bob let's go of Helen and turns away. But he doesn't go for the door. He walks to the table, grab the tv remote, and shuts off rhe news. Then he tells Helen firmly that his family will always be his priority.
    I'm thinking Helen could tell this story to Evelyn after Evelyn captures Bob and plans to kill him. Something along the lines of, "if you want to hate someone and punish someone, punish me," because she's the one who told Bob not to go.
    Low-key might rewrite this whole movie at this point.

    • @hateful_commenter
      @hateful_commenter Month ago +215

      🔥🔥✍🏼

    • @Midnight112-n7n
      @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +44

      Well this one is in paragraphs

    • @stormsand9
      @stormsand9 Month ago +122

      what a great writeup! I wish you were on the writing team for Incredibles 2.

    • @TheHalogen131
      @TheHalogen131 Month ago +231

      Damn, this is very compelling. Good stuff, I especially like the part with hacking to Syndrom's files, because it both reinforces her worldview, and is a good callback to the original, and this is something, that just doesn't exist in the sequel.

    • @viraticwars
      @viraticwars Month ago +88

      Why is it fans can write a better sequel? Literally.

  • @supermariobruvva
    @supermariobruvva 6 days ago +4

    I found £50 in the cinema toilet after watching this film. 5 stars.

  • @1.21jiggawatts2
    @1.21jiggawatts2 Month ago +264

    8 years is crazy. The first movie was only 14 years old when the sequel come out, so we are already 2/3 of the way.

    • @8eyes
      @8eyes Month ago +4

      Hopefully they don't mess up incredibles 3.

    • @great2831
      @great2831 Month ago +11

      Is there even plans for that? I haven't heard a lot about it

    • @nadiaz721
      @nadiaz721 Month ago +10

      @great2831 It’s actually set for summer 2028! Brad Bird I think will only be executive producer though, it’ll be Peter sohn who’s directing it - the guy who directed The Good Dinosaur and Elemental. He also voiced Emile in Ratatouille and Squishy in Monsters University. He’s been part of Pixar for a long time, but his directing record is a little to be desired imo 😬. There hasn’t been any plot details yet, but Holly Hunter said they’re about to start voice work in the spring.

    • @imnotsqiddy
      @imnotsqiddy Month ago

      Only? 14 years was a long time.

    • @1.21jiggawatts2
      @1.21jiggawatts2 Month ago +11

      @i@imnotsqiddymeant “only” in a sense that all the fans of the original felt it it was FOREVER since the first movie when the sequel came out, but it was only 14 years. I’d imagine a lot of us feel like the sequel was still recent, not almost already at the age the first movie was when it released.

  • @Laurmachi
    @Laurmachi Month ago +174

    10:32 The perfect cut. 10/10, no notes.

    • @aw2633
      @aw2633 Month ago +24

      Glad you noticed it’s sending me

  • @ivlis.w
    @ivlis.w 26 days ago +6

    Parents: But what about my 4 year old watching the movie???
    Director: Skill issue
    Also the Jack Jack short film in the original is already so much better than the sequel

  • @skippingstep1515
    @skippingstep1515 Month ago +1366

    Bob losing a FISTFIGHT to the Underminer in the first 5 minutes was the biggest tell this film was not up to parr (bad pun) with the first.
    Bob, the guy who sent the Omnidroid further than a football field with ONE PUNCH lost a FISTFIGHT with the UNDERMINER.

    • @battle_beanz
      @battle_beanz Month ago +33

      after that i was like they finna play in my face 🤦🏾‍♀️

    • @rosecitystud1908
      @rosecitystud1908 Month ago +168

      The writers really undermineded the character

    • @marshallc6215
      @marshallc6215 Month ago +241

      If they had him outsmarted, then yeah that would be fine, but to have him outmuscled is just ridiculous.

    • @DavidSmith-cr7mb
      @DavidSmith-cr7mb Month ago +30

      it makes sense, I2 was a dialogue on feminism.... they HAD to make Bob weak and bad, the weak-bad-modern-man trope needed to be applied to deconstruct him better.

    • @marshallc6215
      @marshallc6215 Month ago +45

      ​@DavidSmith-cr7mb shouldn't they have had bob be exactly the big strong man that he thinks he needs to be so that they can show that wasnt the soltion he thought it was?
      Instead, it was basically the exact opposite of the feminist solution. "See your problem was that you got out muscled. You should have been stronger and that would have protected your family and city."

  • @Midnight112-n7n
    @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +224

    A prequel would've actually been much better for this movie. We could've gotten to see all the superheroes in their prime and the Incredibles could've been part of a superhero organization, an organization thats worried about the government banning them so they are trying to show the world how good they

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +11

      Nah, modern Pixar/modern Disney would've ruined it too. They should've went with Brad Bird's original sequel plan

    • @Midnight112-n7n
      @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +4

      @dtxspeaks268 what was the original sequel plan

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +26

      ​@Midnight112-n7n the kids would've been older and JJ struggles with his powers and a villain maniuplates him basically.

    • @Midnight112-n7n
      @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +7

      @dtxspeaks268 thats better than what we got

    • @kitty3999
      @kitty3999 Month ago +16

      @dtxspeaks268 All I ever wanted from the sequel was the kids to be aged up.
      Because there are so many ways to show how their views on having powers and maybe becoming a hero could change from the stress and commitments that are now pressured from the general public.

  • @ddnava96
    @ddnava96 13 days ago +3

    The scene with the Underminer was so perfect in NOT being a cliffhanger but rather a vehicle to represent character growth at the end of the movie that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 basically copied it with the rhinoceros

  • @zoeledwards6617
    @zoeledwards6617 Month ago +67

    Saying the Underminer wasn't a cliffhanger, but a 'unified front' is perfectly said. Nailed it.

  • @deathdrivesapontiac
    @deathdrivesapontiac Month ago +151

    When i was little, I thought the suicidal guy was doing a trapeze act
    LOL

    • @Yon-k2b
      @Yon-k2b 20 days ago +6

      I watched it as a kid and understood he was trying to kill himself. Like even my parents explained that. Idk why it never felt too adult for me to understand.

    • @twothirdsnerd
      @twothirdsnerd 19 days ago +2

      Me too

    • @SireMirck
      @SireMirck 18 days ago +5

      @Yon-k2b Yeah i don't get why some people say that the movie is "too mature" or "dark" for kids. Mate, kids dont care as long as you dont show gore or something. Heck I'm SURE i came up with darker stuff as a kid than some R rated movies

  • @user-so7fc9in2m
    @user-so7fc9in2m Month ago +10

    2:00 I honestly disagree with his idea that it's not for kids, most kids will still love it, they'll relate to dash or violent and they'll enjoy hearing the story. It's just that they won't appreciate the nucance of it until they're parents themselves decades later.

  • @LEGO_Vince
    @LEGO_Vince Month ago +302

    Disney: we will not try to scare the four-year-olds in this one.
    Also Disney: Hey, you know what would be fun? let's give everyone epilepsy!

    • @ManiSuckz
      @ManiSuckz 12 days ago +1

      You can't be "given" epilepsy 😂 you're born with it

    • @TemuKamishiroRui
      @TemuKamishiroRui 11 days ago

      Either way Disney failed. I used to find the screenslaver’s mask terrifying when I was younger. 😅

  • @BlazingKhioneus
    @BlazingKhioneus Month ago +293

    Also the "we are evil" speech wouldve been so much more effective if it was "we staged all the incidents where we saved the day. The train, the helicopters, screen slaver's capture. All an act. Heck I still have drinks with Bomb Voyage on the weekend." especially since it's true that evelyn staged them.

  • @dopplervocals
    @dopplervocals 27 days ago +3

    yooo I loved your twist on Evelyn as a villain. Her hating the Parr family because of something Bob did in the past would've been INSANE

  • @carlososoriohernandez3979

    21:31 or why not make both Bob and Helen knew Evelyn's father? And when he tried to call both of them, Bob wanted to attend the calls both were getting on their respective phones but Helen, who's stick to follow the law, she told Bob they should ignore the call and let the authorities take care of whatever the problem was. That would make Evelyn have a more personal grudge torwards Helen, making her start to question if blindly following the rules was right in the first place

    • @Dabajaws
      @Dabajaws Month ago +41

      This right here

    • @jmann6368
      @jmann6368 Month ago +39

      That definitely would've made Evelyn's actions even more personal, although it's foundation is still pretty similar to Syndrome's

    • @jacobhargiss3839
      @jacobhargiss3839 Month ago +33

      ​@jmann6368 syndromes foundation was more jealousy. He wanted to be a hero but didnt have what other heroes did. So, he aimed to make the public see him as one.

  • @studio96films65
    @studio96films65 Month ago +167

    I thought the incredibles 2 would’ve been about society slowly accepting supers and the government making them legal again but there’s a new group of young heroes who push out the old guard and even blames heroes like Mr. Incredible and others for their failures that made supers illegal in the first place and they take a new effective, efficient, and cold approach to heroism that seems to deviate away from Bob’s vision of what a hero is. I thought that would’ve been a better story.

    • @paul1113
      @paul1113 Month ago +5

      Isn't this the superman story what's so funny about truth, justice and the american way ?

    • @user-nz4qs1ff7e
      @user-nz4qs1ff7e Month ago +22

      Rather than focusing on Helen, the sequel could’ve had started a few years ahead and focused on Dash and Violet being indoctrinated by the new wave of heroes and slowly rebelling against their parents. Bob and Parr’s relationship largely focuses on their marriage problems and trust issues in the first film; naturally, the second can focus on parents struggling in their relationship with their rebellious teenage children. It would’ve been an organic evolution of the family themes in the first film

    • @UnifiedEntity
      @UnifiedEntity Month ago +1

      This sounds like DC comics Kingdom Come .....a more lighter, friendlier version.

  • @prb463
    @prb463 20 days ago +3

    The message of this movie is "screens bad, family good."
    So profound

  • @depressedengineer5766
    @depressedengineer5766 Month ago +128

    "Hahaa, just like old times.."
    "Just like ol-"
    "AAHH-"

  • @mr.bananaman9805
    @mr.bananaman9805 Month ago +119

    crazy how building off that cliffhanger undermined the sequel.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +11

      There was already a follow up to the ending of the first called Rise of the Underminer that was Canon before Disney decononized it. Brad Bird considered it Canon when he wrote his original script for the sequel

    • @emblemblade9245
      @emblemblade9245 Month ago +8

      Ok 1. It was never a cliffhanger, it was just a means of closure, showing that the family is fighting supervillains together now, to highlight the kids becoming heroes and the parents being brought back together in ideals again.
      And second, Rise of the Underminer is a 3D beat ‘em up with practically zero story. It would barely pass for a stand-alone cartoon episode, let alone a movie sequel.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +1

      ​@emblemblade9245 ROTU was a good story and the best follow up to the first movie. You're literally trashing a game that meant to follow up on the movie alongside the comics and the original sequel plans. Brad Bird considered it canon in his original script. A lot of you Disney shills like the fake canon and hate the good canon.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago

      ​@emblemblade9245 ROTU was a good story and the best follow up to the first movie. You're literally trashing a game that meant to follow up on the movie alongside the comics and the original sequel plans. Brad Bird considered it canon in his original script. A lot of you Disney shills like the fake canon and hate the good canon.

    • @mak_attakks
      @mak_attakks Month ago +16

      The underminer was so undermining, he undermined the sequel, making him the greatest villain ever.

  • @j.m.l.m.
    @j.m.l.m. Month ago +15

    That scene where Helen is in the frozen room is literally pulled from FF 2005

  • @AnneettaLife
    @AnneettaLife Month ago +164

    5:56 if that was a cliffhanger that is one cliffhanger that never bothered me. The Incredibles was a perfect movie. I have never heard anyone who has ever asked for a sequel.

    • @SandwichGamesHeavy
      @SandwichGamesHeavy Month ago +31

      Yeah it was there to be like "yeah they still have adventures that await them, but this is not a part of our story"

    • @bizboy6036
      @bizboy6036 Month ago +10

      I honestly thought the underminer was added to the movie last second so they could make videogames on him

    • @idonthavenameidea1558
      @idonthavenameidea1558 20 days ago +5

      The way he announces himself is pretty on the nose too. It's obvious that he was not meant to be this deep villain like Syndrome is.

  • @wowzers94
    @wowzers94 Month ago +119

    I haven't thought about Incredibles 2 in years, but I was instantly taken back to the feeling of disappointment I had leaving the theaters when you reminded me it even exists.

  • @evanmarcus4
    @evanmarcus4 28 days ago +7

    The sad thing about this movie is that the fight for superhero legality in the wake of the really good PR moment from the end of the first movie would have been a really interesting plot device, that sounds like a great movie. There was no reason to revert the teamwork, they could have just had Helen's PR stuff act as the wedge on its own, causing new conflict without overwriting the original.

  • @fallingheadphones
    @fallingheadphones Month ago +137

    what I really wanted from an Incredibles 2 was a time skip of some kind. provide new scenarios for the family to go through! Maybe Violet's engaged, maybe Dash is starting college, maybe we actually get to meet Jack Jack (who probably just wants to go by Jack these days, but maybe his family always calls him Jack Jack and that bothers him idk). but yea, like you said, we just got the same character arcs, the same story for them all to go through again. Doesn't make much sense... We could still have new supers, but it's like a new generation of supers. Maybe like a 10 year time skip idk. It's frustrating

    • @Rainygirl3100
      @Rainygirl3100 11 days ago +1

      if the Incredibles 3 still isn't a timeskip I'm going to riot

  • @JackThePickler
    @JackThePickler Month ago +79

    I don't think it would be impossible to "age up" the kids' power. Violet's barrier powers could get the emphasis to represent an unwillingness to allow people in her life close to her. Dash's super speed could transition into a symbol for his unwillingness to commit to obligations, "running" from commitment so to speak. The film could focus on an adolescent Jack Jack whose powers being in flux represents perhaps burgeoning identity issues he's having going into puberty. Just spitballing.

    • @collig62pg3d5
      @collig62pg3d5 Month ago +8

      This. Jack Jack being a baby is wasted potential

  • @hunterofyautja1987
    @hunterofyautja1987 Month ago +101

    What if instead of a sequel it would have been about another super hero in this universe

    • @Midnight112-n7n
      @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +20

      I also thought of that. I had said in my original comment a prequel would've been better than this movie

    • @Jheff99
      @Jheff99  Month ago +18

      I do think a prequel could've been really interesting!

    • @Midnight112-n7n
      @Midnight112-n7n Month ago +2

      @Jheff99 Totally! We could've gotten to see the superheroes together as an organization

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +2

      ​@Midnight112-n7n a sequel was always planned but it wasn't going to be this

    • @i_like_lemons
      @i_like_lemons Month ago

      ​@Jheff99not necessary a prequel, just another super hero at around the same time dealing with their own problems

  • @tylernosubtitle
    @tylernosubtitle Month ago +19

    18:56 “big obvious stupid fucking hypno glasses” deserves a like from me 👍

  • @DesmondSlater-n6k
    @DesmondSlater-n6k 18 days ago +1

    The deleted scenes would have helped this movie a lot

  • @Thenewbycomicboy
    @Thenewbycomicboy Month ago +18

    Nah bro you're right about the first movie. The incredibles is one of those movies that can never get old no matter how old it is.

  • @Monkey_Boy9602
    @Monkey_Boy9602 Month ago +84

    You don't know how pissed I was when I saw that they were just repeating the plot from the first movie, only having Elasti-Girl reliving *her* glory days and Bob was taking care of the kids. I was wanting to see the family fighting as a team for the entire movie, as was implied by the end of the last one! It's kinda crazy because it's actually been awhile since I've watched a Pixar movie in the theater. I think "Up" was the last one they made that I was interested in.
    Don't even get me started on that "it's for kids" bullplop! I don't know how many times The Wife and I argued over movies for the kids. She'd always ask, "Can't you just watch something for the kids?", and I would always answer, "If they can't entertain everyone, they don't deserve my money!"

  • @bogo7195
    @bogo7195 8 days ago +2

    2:15 that is what used to make Pixar movies so great; they had something to offer for every age group. You can rewatch these movies years later and find a lot of subtext and themes aimed towards the parents watching with their kids.

  • @markusnixon3156
    @markusnixon3156 Month ago +79

    2:30 Putting a scene of Wish up after all of those Incredibles scenes actually gave me a bit of whiplash, holy moly the art direction is that much worse to me.

  • @just_a_cabbage7756
    @just_a_cabbage7756 Month ago +66

    I think their powers can fit other archetypes as adults.
    Dash could be rushing through life, trying to get certain milestones while missing out on human connections. This would actually be quite relevant with the modern "always grinding" mentality that a lot influencers are pushing on young boys and men.
    Violet coul then be the opposite, trying to find stability as her priority, not necesseraly denouncing hero work, but maybe there could be some worldbuilding and make something like hero agencies (thanks mha) that pay considerable less but have a better stream of jobs.
    Jack jack would then be about his potential. The fact that he is the most op of the bunch but doesn't want to be a hero could be a fun idea.
    Add a pinch of "living in my parents shadow" drama, and you can have a cohesive time skip that retains their deveolpments from the first one.

    • @coldstuff9784
      @coldstuff9784 16 days ago +1

      that bit about jack jack reminds me of Dragon Ball Z and how Goku's kids get increasingly strong but also less motivated about fighting. Seeing Gohan go to high school and getting a regular job (and getting his own family) was real novel.

  • @menehuneking
    @menehuneking Month ago +8

    I think you could pretty easily age up the characters and still have their powers make sense. Violet is now a young mom, she uses her forcefields way more, maybe too much, because of how protective she is of her baby. Dash is in college and stressed about tests and his part time job, so hes always moving fast so he can feel like hes getting everything he wants to done. Helen is home with only bob and Jack jack, so she gets stiff after not having to stretch herself as thin. And Bob is doing really well as a hero so he ends up being too strong for his own good and hurts people around him and has to learn how to briddle his strength. Then jack jack is in high-school, taking so many classes and doing so many extra curriculars, and that makes reflects in him trying to use his powers all together rather than focusing on one or two to train and get good at using

  • @maveric619
    @maveric619 Month ago +18

    Holly Hunter going out of her way to spend time with real pilots learning the proper codes and callouts for the flight to the island was more effort than the entire second movie put into it's characters.

  • @Beebee51366
    @Beebee51366 Month ago +117

    They really should’ve had the characters age in real time for the sequel. I think it would’ve been interesting if there was a 14 year Timeskip where now Violet and Dash are adults who either have their own families or are in the process of starting their own families. They would be in their 20s by the time of the sequel.
    Funnily enough Incredibles 2 fell into the same trap as Marvel and DC where they reset everything back to the Status Quo despite all the development the characters went through. Marvel and DC would write a plot like Incredibles 2 where they retcon the original in order to make a sequel.

    • @saddlerrye6725
      @saddlerrye6725 Month ago +5

      I feel like a lot of sequels make this same mistake. They "correct" the main character flaws in the first installment, and when it's time to write a sequel, they can't figure out a new problem the "fixed" character dynamic might have. So they just regress the characters back to where they were at the very beginning, attempting to repeat the same character growth.

  • @joannadzenowski6214
    @joannadzenowski6214 4 days ago +2

    The roboglasses could have imbedded themselves into supers,so it could have been a lot scarier and harder to thwart. Actual consequences instead of random things

  • @SuperLegendOfBros
    @SuperLegendOfBros Month ago +109

    My question is, who the hell gave the little girl that "The ScreenSlaver is still out there sign." that Helen sees in that one scene. Did her mom make that for her or something?

    • @lewstherintelamon244
      @lewstherintelamon244 Month ago +10

      I always assumed it was the Screenslaver.

    • @joshslater2426
      @joshslater2426 Month ago +9

      That scene always irked me. I always assumed it was the mother, but why would she make it? Was it something done by the Screenslaver or creepy coincidence? The film never answered the question either.

    • @SuperLegendOfBros
      @SuperLegendOfBros Month ago +34

      @lewstherintelamon244 I think the idea of Evelyn taking the time out of her probably busy schedule to make the sign, give it to a little girl that she probably doesn't know or worse yet one she hired all in the hope that Helen sees it and doubt herself for all of a moment is so funny. It's honestly the kind of obsession I wish they leaned more into instead of the 'We don't know each other' angle. Like imagine instead of hating supers, Evelyn was instead just so singularly obsessed with Elastigirl that she just wanted to give her a supervillain she deemed worthy of her pedigree. Someone not physically imposing but mentally, someone clever that she had to figure out the mystery of. It would be kind of a twist on Syndrome's own previous toxic fandom, this time the villian is too much of a fan. So much so she's willing to hurt the innocent just to give Elastigirl a chance in the spotlight and something to fight.

    • @AeridisArt
      @AeridisArt Month ago +7

      Yes! I love this idea. Like, instead of wanting supers to be illegal, she actually wants them to be legal and is helping towards that goal, but her obsession for caused her to take things too far and when Elastigirl finds out and tells her to stop, she goes true supervillain while believing she's helping supers.

    • @IcenLight
      @IcenLight Month ago +5

      The girl also can't be hypnotised, no screen or goggles, so is she perfectly ok with that sign? This made no sense and I feel like it isn't brought up enough.

  • @ScoutStormm
    @ScoutStormm Month ago +334

    7:11 Thunderhead is raising his adopted kids with his “roommate” Scott… right…

    • @AgentMulder120
      @AgentMulder120 Month ago +66

      THATS WHAT IM SAYING LMAO. i did a double take at my screen like a cartoon character like oh sure. sure yea his roommate lmao. yea

    • @FeraliAlie
      @FeraliAlie Month ago +55

      I love that little detail, it's so cute. Shows that they all had their own little interesting lives

    • @fizzyjam
      @fizzyjam Month ago +44

      that little anecdote there is more interesting to me than all of incredibles 2. give me a queer prequel spin-off of the incredibles with thunderhead instead!! that would be peak

    • @FeraliAlie
      @FeraliAlie Month ago +40

      ​​​@fizzyjam A prequel series that focuses on the lives of Supers including the ones killed by Syndrome would be sweet

    • @Ojutai1012
      @Ojutai1012 Month ago +46

      Oh my god they were roommates

  • @ChickenDrawsDogs
    @ChickenDrawsDogs Month ago +105

    "Hey look, the assistant is the twist villain!" - guess where I got another one of those from.

    • @great2831
      @great2831 Month ago +6

      Boy i sure do hope someone didn't copy the other film's homework

    • @newbie1958
      @newbie1958 Month ago +15

      Would it shock you to know that the second incredibles came out two years after the first Zootopia movie.

  • @YodaOnABender
    @YodaOnABender Month ago +33

    I remember when incredibles 2 was a new movie… eight years

  • @Battousai1981
    @Battousai1981 Month ago +3

    Watching this video realizing I don’t remember anything about this movie. That’s how big of a disappointment it was. Completely forgettable.

  • @godhaloknight6332
    @godhaloknight6332 Month ago +26

    Still blaming the nothing burger of a film "The Good Dinosaur" for essentially screwing over this Sequel

    • @Katetengen
      @Katetengen Month ago +3

      That’s still a better film than the incredibles 2

    • @godhaloknight6332
      @godhaloknight6332 Month ago +6

      ​@Katetengen
      Only by account of not ruining the reputation of a great film
      I'm still gonna trash the film for being a colossal waste of productivity and rushing which screwed over Incredibles 2's development

    • @dokaasbeRhD9Y9BpH
      @dokaasbeRhD9Y9BpH Month ago +4

      Apparently that movie, like Elio, had a massive script rewrite in the middle of production where the plot was dumbed down. The artstyle feels uncanny having saturated cartoon characters with a hyper realistic background. And also, humans wouldn’t exist at all if dinosaurs survived. No rise of mammals. The croods is way better…

  • @ThalmorAgent-08
    @ThalmorAgent-08 Month ago +23

    It's a crime that they deleted an opening scene for Incredibles 2, which discussed Bob's friendships with the heroes who Syndrome murdered, particularly Simon as well as Jack.

  • @barbariangamin5136
    @barbariangamin5136 19 days ago +1

    This what happens when adults never grow up. These movies aren’t for you

  • @OnlyWaifuYT
    @OnlyWaifuYT Month ago +484

    >be me
    >23 yo
    >try to buy a ticket for Incredibles 2
    >cashier asks "okay ma'am, you and how many children? 😊"
    >"uh... just me?"
    >everyone gasps and looks back to me
    >cashier gives me the most uncanny glare I've ever seen
    >sirens start glaring
    >theather locks down
    >Swat teams start rapelling down the ceiling
    >surrounded and pointed at by arm guards
    >"MA'AM YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE THIS BY YOURSELF, THIS MOVIE IS ANIMATED, IT'S FOR KIDS"
    >they shoot me down in cold blood
    >cashier spits on my body
    >last thing I see before I go is a jack jack plushie thrown at me by a 4 year old
    >his dad looks nervous anf horrified
    >"HONEY CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS LOSER?!", says his wife
    >"y-yeah..."

  • @soyboy6723
    @soyboy6723 Month ago +16

    13:20 IM UPSET HEARING THIS MAKES ME UPSET

  • @FogartyAvenue
    @FogartyAvenue 17 days ago +1

    I didn't realise how poopy the sequel was.

  • @SirGriefALot
    @SirGriefALot Month ago +52

    It felt like the whole movie was about the stupid baby.

    • @ShinGhidorah17
      @ShinGhidorah17 Month ago +9

      He was far less insufferable in this first movie. All of them were.

    • @JimmyBoy9878
      @JimmyBoy9878 Month ago +4

      ​@ShinGhidorah17they should have aged them up. I would have loved to see a slightly older dash, violet and Jack be the protagonists.

  • @quantemwensday
    @quantemwensday Month ago +60

    7:35 sounds like it's not far from where megamind takes place

  • @jellyghost6878
    @jellyghost6878 4 days ago +1

    I swear this better not be another "women bad, movie with women worse" video

  • @jamescannon7935
    @jamescannon7935 Month ago +17

    It has NOT been 8 years since the incredibles 2 came out. That's insane.

  • @mandalorianmanic9525
    @mandalorianmanic9525 Month ago +82

    They even break down Bob's character in the second film by making him petty and childish about not getting to go on to be the hero representative.
    The first movie genuinely leaves me with the impression he'd say, when faced with the situation of the second film, "Go on, honey. I'll watch the kids and you kick some butt."
    But instead he whines that it's not him getting to go, and then goes on an arc that "being a daddy is haaard" and sucks at raising his kids and that's the whole bit before getting brainwashed. It's dumb.

    • @JaydenDarling-k8u
      @JaydenDarling-k8u 24 days ago +2

      That's like a male lion getting jealous that he doesn't get to hunt a zebra, antelope, or wildebeest, even though the cubs need his protection from predators, like hyenas, wild dogs, leopards, etc

    • @furthings
      @furthings 14 days ago

      @JaydenDarling-k8u A male lion is the most dangerous creature to a lion cub LMAO

    • @JaydenDarling-k8u
      @JaydenDarling-k8u 14 days ago

      ​@furthings Yeah, but usually, it's dangerous to cubs that aren't part of its pride

  • @catalyst4385
    @catalyst4385 24 days ago +5

    What I find funny is that you said the sequel felt like it was more geared towards kids yet it had the words damn and hell. I don’t know why, of all things, that stuck with me all these years, but it did.

  • @ItatsuMagnatsa
    @ItatsuMagnatsa Month ago +114

    The Incredibles 2 has Ralf Breaks the Internet Syndrome....

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +16

      Both UNcredibles 2 and Ralph Fs The Internet have Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Syndrome

    • @cloudshines812
      @cloudshines812 Month ago +16

      Can’t forget about Frozen II which is a mess of a plot that ran out of time

    • @ItatsuMagnatsa
      @ItatsuMagnatsa Month ago +1

      ​@dtxspeaks268 lol 😂

    • @SamsonMcarthy-oo6cb
      @SamsonMcarthy-oo6cb Month ago +4

      ​@cloudshines812Frozen 2 has the advantage of being really nice to look at. Nothing else though.

    • @revolvingworld2676
      @revolvingworld2676 Month ago +13

      Granted as terrible as Incredibles 2 is, Ralph breaks the Internet is worse

  • @davidGon803
    @davidGon803 Month ago +35

    what do you mean it’s been almost a decade since this movie came out

  • @usemorewood3184
    @usemorewood3184 Month ago +1

    I don’t care what evidence you have to the contrary, I refuse to believe this wasn’t a covid movie

  • @TheRealFlapSlapper
    @TheRealFlapSlapper Month ago +15

    7:58 “our characters arcs are completed” brother two of them are children. There is infinitely more to develop with these characters. Just because a horrible company isn’t capable of of putting out a great sequel doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a sequel at all. This movie could’ve/ should’ve/ and would’ve had a great sequel if things were different

  • @bruvamichal7437
    @bruvamichal7437 Month ago +37

    Yea, pixar is more obsessed with hight texture rather than story telling. I think disney buy out is at fault.

    • @dtxspeaks268
      @dtxspeaks268 Month ago +2

      Yup. Same with Star Wars and Marvel

    • @jacobhargiss3839
      @jacobhargiss3839 Month ago +2

      Probably because their animators are the only folks on staff that know ehat they're doing.

    • @GizmoaGames
      @GizmoaGames Month ago

      It is.

  • @felidaefatalis
    @felidaefatalis 3 days ago +1

    "bomb voyage and buddy had the same likelihood of returning later in the story" bruh reread your script, this line is immediately by the sentences after it

  • @VegiGOAT
    @VegiGOAT Month ago +18

    The ONE thing I will give this movie is we got more scenes with frozone in it

  • @ElementTrinity
    @ElementTrinity Month ago +31

    "I don't want to compromise the intensity in order to please a four-year-old" let's bring this energy back pls 🙏🙏

    • @funkydiscogod
      @funkydiscogod Month ago +3

      I forget the exact quote, but it was like "Kids can handle some intense moments, as long as there's a happy ending."