sir severe punishment dena child ko kya correct option hai? kya hm neither 1 nor 2 follows choose kr skte? because ye bhi toh ek extreme solution hua na.?
Repeated warnings have already been given. So warning won't help. And bursting crackers inside the school premises repeatedly despite warning is not something to be entertained, it can cause a lot of damage. He is playing with fire. It might even cause more damage to him than a severe punishment ever can. Severe punishment given by school principal to the child will be as per the school discipline and age of the child, so it won't be extreme as such. But yes, the severity is subjective, so take the lesson from the question.
No. It is not since he has repeatedly been warned, it did not work. If 'repeated warnings' was not mentioned in the statement, then taking away crackers and warning was definitely a good option.
Sir how do we decide ki kab "either or" choose krna hai and kab "both" choose krna hai when they are in the same question? for example: Statement: The finance mininster submits his resignation a month before the new budget is to presented into the parliament. Course of action: a) the resignation should be accepted and another person should be appointed as the finance minister. b) the resignation should not be accepted. A B Either Neither Both whats the right answer according to you? the same doubt is in satetment and assumption as well.
It always depends on the framing of statement and courses of action. And we should decide without assuming any additional information. The statement given is also including that in a month, the new budget is to be presented which indicates that considering the timeline, resignation shouldn't be accepted. Only b follows. If the statement had not mentioned about the budget part, either a or b follows since there is no urgency or criticality associated.
@@mathological thank you so much. jha se question tha usme either wala option correct dikha rha tha so i got confused. also... if there is a choice between both and either how do we choose? let me give you an example. Statement : A Needs 1 lack rupees within a month to solve his financial issues. (self made question for clearing the doubt) actions: 1 A can take a loan. 2 A can get a job. so ab is question mein he can EITHER take a loan or a job to solve his problem. ya fir he can take a loan AND get a job jisse instant paise aa jayenge uske pass if in case he gets a job of 50k.
You don't solve questions based on presumptions, questions asked in exam will be self sufficient or should be treated as self sufficient. With the finance minister example, if there was no constraint of budget presentation within a month, either of the actions solves the problem. Hence we must not do both. If either action alone solves the problem, either must be selected. But sometimes both actions together are also needed. For eg, City X has water crisis and has water only for next 15 days. Action: a. Citizens should use water as optimally as possible. b. City Administration should address the water crisis. Both actions must be desirable in this case, a is needed considering the limited water and b to address the crisis. Either alone won't solve the issue.
Statement: Despite good economic progress of the country, a significant number of undernourished children have been observed in the rural parts of the country. Course of Action: I. Government should increase Wealth tax/Income tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived classes. II. Government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory. Which of the above conclusions follows beyond a reasonable doubt? a. Only I follows b. Only II follows c. Both I and II follow d. Neither I nor II follows Sir can you please help me to understand how 2nd coarse of action is correct because second course of action suggests providing free meals in primary schools and making primary education compulsory. However, this action may have negative impacts as it forces education on everyone, regardless of their interests or abilities. Not everyone desires to study, and compulsory education might restrict individual choices.
12:05 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Unexpected twist sir
salman khan has not been harmed here
sir severe punishment dena child ko kya correct option hai? kya hm neither 1 nor 2 follows choose kr skte? because ye bhi toh ek extreme solution hua na.?
Repeated warnings have already been given. So warning won't help. And bursting crackers inside the school premises repeatedly despite warning is not something to be entertained, it can cause a lot of damage. He is playing with fire. It might even cause more damage to him than a severe punishment ever can.
Severe punishment given by school principal to the child will be as per the school discipline and age of the child, so it won't be extreme as such. But yes, the severity is subjective, so take the lesson from the question.
@@mathological Understood. Thank you sir.
Sir but taking away all his crackers and then warning him isnt a good option?
No. It is not since he has repeatedly been warned, it did not work. If 'repeated warnings' was not mentioned in the statement, then taking away crackers and warning was definitely a good option.
Are they pyqs of snap
No, any PYQs of SNAP would be marked in the top left corner with the year of occurrence.
Sir how do we decide ki kab "either or" choose krna hai and kab "both" choose krna hai when they are in the same question?
for example:
Statement:
The finance mininster submits his resignation a month before the new budget is to presented into the parliament.
Course of action:
a) the resignation should be accepted and another person should be appointed as the finance minister.
b) the resignation should not be accepted.
A
B
Either
Neither
Both
whats the right answer according to you?
the same doubt is in satetment and assumption as well.
It always depends on the framing of statement and courses of action. And we should decide without assuming any additional information.
The statement given is also including that in a month, the new budget is to be presented which indicates that considering the timeline, resignation shouldn't be accepted. Only b follows.
If the statement had not mentioned about the budget part, either a or b follows since there is no urgency or criticality associated.
@@mathological thank you so much. jha se question tha usme either wala option correct dikha rha tha so i got confused.
also... if there is a choice between both and either how do we choose?
let me give you an example.
Statement :
A Needs 1 lack rupees within a month to solve his financial issues. (self made question for clearing the doubt)
actions:
1 A can take a loan.
2 A can get a job.
so ab is question mein he can EITHER take a loan or a job to solve his problem.
ya fir he can take a loan AND get a job jisse instant paise aa jayenge uske pass if in case he gets a job of 50k.
You don't solve questions based on presumptions, questions asked in exam will be self sufficient or should be treated as self sufficient.
With the finance minister example, if there was no constraint of budget presentation within a month, either of the actions solves the problem. Hence we must not do both.
If either action alone solves the problem, either must be selected. But sometimes both actions together are also needed.
For eg,
City X has water crisis and has water only for next 15 days.
Action:
a. Citizens should use water as optimally as possible.
b. City Administration should address the water crisis.
Both actions must be desirable in this case, a is needed considering the limited water and b to address the crisis. Either alone won't solve the issue.
@@mathological okayyy... now that helps.. thank you so much
Statement:
Despite good economic progress of the country, a significant number of undernourished children have been observed in the rural parts of the country.
Course of Action:
I. Government should increase Wealth tax/Income tax and use that money for the upliftment of the deprived classes.
II. Government should introduce schemes like free meals in primary schools and make primary education compulsory.
Which of the above conclusions follows beyond a reasonable doubt?
a. Only I follows
b. Only II follows
c. Both I and II follow
d. Neither I nor II follows
Sir can you please help me to understand how 2nd coarse of action is correct because second course of action suggests providing free meals in primary schools and making primary education compulsory. However, this action may have negative impacts as it forces education on everyone, regardless of their interests or abilities. Not everyone desires to study, and compulsory education might restrict individual choices.