Nice video. It's funny because in real life, these phases are blended together so much it's hard to say what level you are in the project. Especially with MEP and structural consultants who only now detail :) You better be ready when you turn the design over to them :)
Cool Video!! I don't have much use of the AIA, but this is actually helpful. As an Architect that works on both residential and hi-rise construction, I would almost never go past 300. Shop drawings I would NEVER produce as those should usually be made first by a manufacturer of the item you need, then you approve them per Design Intent...if I produced shop drawings (even with craft knowledge) I would be opening myself up to huge liabilities; I will draw some nice kitchen cabinets, but I would not be producing shop drawings of how to build them...the cabinet maker would.
Absolutely right ✅️ and you are lucky because I am stuck in making shop drawings or production drawings and calculating qty for wood required in a manufacturing company specialised in kitchen cabinets and closets .... working as Technical Engineer now a days and very, very far from Designing buildings , felt like I am no more Architect .....
LOD should be understood as "Level Of Trust" regardless the level of detail or information on it. It doesn't matter how detailed is the geometry of an element or how much data it has; if at this stage this element is at LOD100 it is only for conceptual design or design intent. For example, as much as an element has data for manufacturer and model, you can't trust that information until LOD300.
please make tutorial of how to make a swimming pool detail in architecture and structure🙏 thanks so much if you make this videos, because there are still few people who make video tutorials
I am studying a masters in BIM in Europe, and we have been introduced to the concept of LOIN. Do you think that eventually this way of stating the information requirements will overtake LOD? Or do you think these both configurations can work together?
Level of Information Need (calling it LOIN is discouraged) already has supplanted LoD and is stated as part of the ISO 19650-1 standard therefore is a necessary part of BIM as described by the ISO 19650 suite. LoD is less evolved and less useful as it focuses just on geometric representation rather than getting the right information (including non geometric) to the right people. If we're just looking at a model from a purely graphical perspective for creating plans, elevations, sections, details etc then LoD is still relevant, but that's missing the point of BIM.
@TD-AT exactly, it's still good to know about LoD as a lot of people still work with it, but as you said, it only focuses on geometric information and depending on the project it can result in over-modelling.
Precise and needful information in hands whenever required.... Thank you 😊
Nice video. It's funny because in real life, these phases are blended together so much it's hard to say what level you are in the project. Especially with MEP and structural consultants who only now detail :) You better be ready when you turn the design over to them :)
Very true for structural consultants. But I think drawing boundaries between the different levels may be very helpful.
This is a very instructive video. Thank you for sharing.
excellent! thank you : )
Thank u, Balkan❤
Cool Video!! I don't have much use of the AIA, but this is actually helpful. As an Architect that works on both residential and hi-rise construction, I would almost never go past 300. Shop drawings I would NEVER produce as those should usually be made first by a manufacturer of the item you need, then you approve them per Design Intent...if I produced shop drawings (even with craft knowledge) I would be opening myself up to huge liabilities; I will draw some nice kitchen cabinets, but I would not be producing shop drawings of how to build them...the cabinet maker would.
Absolutely right ✅️ and you are lucky because I am stuck in making shop drawings or production drawings and calculating qty for wood required in a manufacturing company specialised in kitchen cabinets and closets .... working as Technical Engineer now a days and very, very far from Designing buildings , felt like I am no more Architect .....
@@nadeem006 oh so that's reality everywhere
@blitz9196 Unfortunately, yes, bro
@blitz9196 yes bro .
LOD should be understood as "Level Of Trust" regardless the level of detail or information on it. It doesn't matter how detailed is the geometry of an element or how much data it has; if at this stage this element is at LOD100 it is only for conceptual design or design intent.
For example, as much as an element has data for manufacturer and model, you can't trust that information until LOD300.
Good one
please make tutorial of how to make a swimming pool detail in architecture and structure🙏 thanks so much if you make this videos, because there are still few people who make video tutorials
I am studying a masters in BIM in Europe, and we have been introduced to the concept of LOIN. Do you think that eventually this way of stating the information requirements will overtake LOD? Or do you think these both configurations can work together?
Level of Information Need (calling it LOIN is discouraged) already has supplanted LoD and is stated as part of the ISO 19650-1 standard therefore is a necessary part of BIM as described by the ISO 19650 suite. LoD is less evolved and less useful as it focuses just on geometric representation rather than getting the right information (including non geometric) to the right people.
If we're just looking at a model from a purely graphical perspective for creating plans, elevations, sections, details etc then LoD is still relevant, but that's missing the point of BIM.
@TD-AT exactly, it's still good to know about LoD as a lot of people still work with it, but as you said, it only focuses on geometric information and depending on the project it can result in over-modelling.
Is it correct to view level of detail as the same as level of information need?
Sir please tell easily in simple way using standard & Complex words hope you watch this message
Ok,confusing it with Point Cloud Conversion.
Wait. It's not level of detail?