Mig31 Will be the absolute Bias, basically he have the one of the top 5 best radar for a fighter in the world, and flying high, mach 2 and launching r37m
You do know they arent allowed to fly over mach 2.8? Reason is that the engine exuast becomes very high in engine parts and molten metal at these speeds
Guys don't argue, it's great peice of engineering, and was made as interceptor for airdefence purposes (check history of developing). It ain't fighter jet, it just needs high velocity and altitude, like a fast reusable missile. As a man of science myself, i proud of scientists and constructors, who made this plane P.S. Also it had roles of bomber and reconnaissance bomber after modernization
@@MarkMuhammad190 i mean, nowadays, they ofcoarse lose to modern tech, but back then... Also, if a vehicle have that much maintenance time, isn't it a well done job?)
It’s not exactly bad, but as impressive as it was, with super high speed and all, it was not amazing. It had very unreliable engines, a very heavy body, poor maneuverability, and an outdated radar and avionics system.
I think it’s the fact the mig-25 can go mac 2.5 easily and for much longer times than a f-15 which would Never make that speed when loaded with ordinance.
@@Thatguy131-yp5cj I don't think you guys really want the mig 25, dude the radar is dog shit, and the plane can't pull 4.3 Gs at even a moderate speed without ripping itself apart.
@@Nexsoxs pulling tight maneuvers isn’t required for an interceptor meant to volley off missiles and run meanwhile the saphir-25 was suitable for the high altitude and decent range but the mig-25 would’ve been guided in by ground radars anyway, the Russian mig-25s even had advanced computers linked to the radars that flew the plane itself to the targets with minimal pilot intervention. For its time and what it was designed to do it was very good. Swedish radars even picked up mig-25s as close as 2 miles behind sr-71s well within missile range for the r-40s.
This would be a great opportunity to make a "what if" MiG-25 Variant, maybe for an april fools update along with other "what if" vehicles. It would be a theoretical variant, one made with minor adjustments to its design, like using a titanium alloy instead of the heavy nickel-steel one, slapping it better avionics and tweaking the engines a bit so they don't fucking explode while going mach 3.
That wouldent help much. It's aerodynamic simply are not designed for high manuverabilty. It would most likely enter a flat spin pulling more than 20 degrees aoa.
@JoaoLuizLima-xw1nd no, max speed is 2,82 mach, which is 3000 km/h, it never reached over Mach 3. Mack 3,2 was theoretical speed it could reach, but they never let pilots do it because engines would just explode.
FYI: in simple terms, the Mig 25 was only a formidable fighter until it fell into American hands. A deserting Russian pilot escaped the USSR flying one of these, landing it in an American air base in Japan, after that it was bought to light that its large wings were not meant for Manoeuvrability, instead they were to keep the extremely heavy fighter in the air. And even its top speed would cause the engines to overheat in just a few mins. Mustard made a great video on both this plane and the f-15, if you want to hear the full story.
This is indeed true, however in regards to warthunder I don’t think that the reusability or maintainability of your aircraft will matter much when matches don’t last long and you almost always die early in match or don’t return to base
@vladpodolny3143 When America got the Mig-25, they did testing and found thst the bad materials that the Mig 25 was made of could at max pull 2.2 with external fuel tanks which it almost always carried due to the range issues faces by the inefficient engines. Look it up. 2.2 normal load and 4.5 max without those fuel tanks. And at speeds like mach 2.5 max (as any higher would cause the engines to wear down and degrade since they were meant for cruise missiles). That little pull at speeds of mach 2.5 would be around 2 degrees per second max turn which would make it painful to play and a easy target for Amraams and Phoenix missiles.
The mig 25 is like the thrust 2 go fast as frick in straight line you can't turn and don't even think about slowing down as you gonna take 5 mins to speed back up
f15: fighter aircraft designed for multi-role and fighter aircraft. better at fights. mig-25: interceptor designed only to be able to catch up to a mach 3 bomber currently being developed by us. by soviet doctrine, they would never meet.
cool flying brick but such engine's were needed just to lift it off the ground and it couldnt even go mach 3 for longer than 2-3 minutes without its engines melting away
Y’all understand that F15 flies at Mach 2.5, just 400km/h short of the mig 25/31 so any missile launched from F15 or other fast jets would catch it. Also F104 is in the game at 9.3 so it won’t be that unbalanced
My dad was a F14 RIO from 86-90 The mig 25 was the biggest threat they trained for up to the point when we studied the one that defected After that they realized it was more or less a paper tiger
It was a flying shit brick, all it could do was go fast 😂. There's a reason why the russians never used it for anything besides an interceptor role. It's a baby sr-71
@Sunshine-sl3kr there wasn't a need nor a demand for it to begin with. Wether it was built to shoot down heavy bombers or not aircraft of the Era could've 100% done it. The us are the ones who revealed it was a flying shit brick, because that's all it was meant for, to be fast and have a radar. Whether or not it got used in a war, it still would've been a flying shit brick. Lack Lustre turning. It was a fast flying shit brick and nothing else.
Couldn’t hold claimed top speed for long (5 minutes) due to the plane destroying itself from overheating at 2.8 mach. The designed cruising speed is 2.3 mach which is a standard cruising speed for most jets. The US did get a Foxbat from a defector that flew to Japan and landed the plane which the US government took for researching.
The cruising speed for an f15 is normally only 570 mph compared to the mig 25 that averaged at about 1800 mph. Not even speaking of the major difference in altitude.
Issue with adding it to WT. It has no look down radar, meaning it would hug the ground in game and can't fly at speeds faster than about mach 1.3. That combined with using R-40 SARH would just make it a worse Phantom on the Soviet team lol. MiG-31 would be a way better choice IMO The no look down radar was due to the fact it was supposed to intercept high speed and high altitude bombers such as the XB-70, sadly for them the US Switch to a fast and low approach after the unfortunate failure of the XB-70
We already have the f15 which built in response to the mig 25, the only advantage it has over the f15 is speed at altitude and that won't really matter in wt unless everyone starts space climbing
the F15 was made to counter this supposed "super fighter" but the mig 25 ended up beiing just an interceptor while the us just made the TRUE super fighter.
That was not supposed to be a super fighter. It was developed as interceptor from the beggining Both MiG-25 and F-15 are great planes with its own roles. There is no reason to competing, whose planes a better
@@Sc1ence_Amateurthere were a lot of reasons to compare especially given the cold war, the comparison is quite literslly what made the F-15 exist, as OP said
So uhh, the Mig-25 would prove useless. It's only built for speed, so turns barely, it's radar and avionics are old, and armament was small. It'e easily be beaten by even F-5's.
@@theocelot3957 The SR71 was strictly Reconnaissance, there would be no reason for it to fight unless it was self-defense. which already would've been hard to catch up and lock with its hypersonic and stealth technology.
They could only really add the mig-31, the 25 is not something we want. It had a max g limit of 3.0 under “combat conditions” and would ingest its own engines above Mach 2.6
I've got a feeling it's because it's a flying brick who has literally only one trick, and that's going fast. I believe they also had the problem phantoms did where they don't have guns. Not that getting the nose on target would be easy anyways though I guess. Wouldn't be disappointed if they skipped the 25 and went straight for the 31
It was a paper tiger that burned it's own engines out, was full of technical issues, unreliable and not really fit for service but had the resources to keep them going so
This would probably be a vehicle in one of the “Dreams come true” events, this thing is heavy as shit because they couldn’t source enough titanium for mass production so most of it is a nickle-steel alloy, and it’s missiles were primarily designed for shooting down B-52s and the proposed XB-70, a Vark would probably beat it in a dogfight
IRL they had mechanical issues, so they could not be used to their full effect, in WT they would not have those issues and thus should be placed at 14.0
Considering its engines would literally tear themselves apart at that speed, I think it would honestly be a balanced addition in modern war thunder with engine overheating problems modelled.
where are the leaked documents when we need them
*pulls put folder*
How much you offering?
@@buff_chicken 5000 Ge and 3 150% research boosters
I got 5 bucks and a pack of gummy worms.
Sold!
Objection I got 20 and a bar of Snickers
They should add MiG-31, when someone remembers it existed
huh?
Dude the Mig does exist and it’s my fav for interception
i just searched jt up that is literaly a f15 with a red star 😭
@ yeah but it’s a little faster when it came out now it’s slower
Mig31 Will be the absolute Bias, basically he have the one of the top 5 best radar for a fighter in the world, and flying high, mach 2 and launching r37m
Once Gaijin added this, there's no turning back when the whole match is a Manned Cruise Missile with Missiles 💀
The f104 exists
AHAHAH
@@Tir33nts343bro the F-104 has no chance against a MIG-25 the F-104 has no chance of catching up with it or going as high as the MIG-25
@@aounenzolx4072its not compared but stated that similar plane is in the game
@@aounenzolx4072 hook up a f104 with a modern radar and missiles and we'll see about that
Warthunder just won’t let it go above Mach 1.5 without destroying the aircraft
irl at its highest altitude it can go around mach 2.4-2.6 as its top speed, but at ground level its much much slower, just like every aircraft.
the mig-23 can already go mach 2.4, but it goes mach 1.1-1.2 at low altitude
btw the mig-25 top speed wws theoretically mach 3 but its engines broke if it went past mach 2.4-2.6
@@DecayLe4not even that half the time is much like the MiG-31 would melt long before then due to the poor materials used in the airframe.
You do know they arent allowed to fly over mach 2.8?
Reason is that the engine exuast becomes very high in engine parts and molten metal at these speeds
If the mig 25 was added in war thunder it would be dead on arrival.
You ain't escaping a Phoenix launched from a tomcat flying at Mach 1.6 at 30k feet without disintegrating the jet lol
@@lemieux-z8933Turns out, it is.
Just like in real life.
who cares, add it anyway
Since the f15 is already in game and that jet was basically purpose built to counter tha thing you might be right
Would still be a cool addition
Guys don't argue, it's great peice of engineering, and was made as interceptor for airdefence purposes (check history of developing). It ain't fighter jet, it just needs high velocity and altitude, like a fast reusable missile.
As a man of science myself, i proud of scientists and constructors, who made this plane
P.S. Also it had roles of bomber and reconnaissance bomber after modernization
Man you are a real gem for science lots of respect for you
Not a great piece if you realize how much they slacked off. Aircraft made of steel with longer maintenance time than modern aircraft is insane.
@@MarkMuhammad190 i mean, nowadays, they ofcoarse lose to modern tech, but back then...
Also, if a vehicle have that much maintenance time, isn't it a well done job?)
@@MarkMuhammad190Maybe the maintenance took longer because it's an old aircraft?
It’s not exactly bad, but as impressive as it was, with super high speed and all, it was not amazing. It had very unreliable engines, a very heavy body, poor maneuverability, and an outdated radar and avionics system.
IRL soviet bias
And the push factor of the f15 ❤
@@FIFOFA-0002huh
Still worse than the U.S. Response tho. F-15.
If you watch the full vid you will realise its not as good
heavy piece of junk, that's why it needed to edit the rest of craps out
You know what the mig-25 is like?
The F-104 on steroids
Extremely low bar but OK
@definitelypeacock I meant it has a worse turning radius and is even faster than the F-104
@@Lockinhardenemy
Ah
My bad
@definitelypeacock it’s ok
The F-15 can go Mach 2.5 so it doesn’t make a lot of since to not add MIG-25 it’s direct counterpart
F15E in game can go mach 2.7 and F-111F can go mach 2.84
I think it’s the fact the mig-25 can go mac 2.5 easily and for much longer times than a f-15 which would
Never make that speed when loaded with ordinance.
@@Thatguy131-yp5cj I don't think you guys really want the mig 25, dude the radar is dog shit, and the plane can't pull 4.3 Gs at even a moderate speed without ripping itself apart.
@@Nexsoxs pulling tight maneuvers isn’t required for an interceptor meant to volley off missiles and run meanwhile the saphir-25 was suitable for the high altitude and decent range but the mig-25 would’ve been guided in by ground radars anyway, the Russian mig-25s even had advanced computers linked to the radars that flew the plane itself to the targets with minimal pilot intervention. For its time and what it was designed to do it was very good. Swedish radars even picked up mig-25s as close as 2 miles behind sr-71s well within missile range for the r-40s.
F-15 goes mach 2.5 while trying his ass off and without any ordnance.
Its not comparable to mig-25.
This would be a great opportunity to make a "what if" MiG-25 Variant, maybe for an april fools update along with other "what if" vehicles. It would be a theoretical variant, one made with minor adjustments to its design, like using a titanium alloy instead of the heavy nickel-steel one, slapping it better avionics and tweaking the engines a bit so they don't fucking explode while going mach 3.
They would implode.
Maybe we could call it the SR-71 blackbird and have Lockheed develop it
@@ThelatestAbrams nah, they'd be missing the neutron style (proxying the Titanium sale)
XF-84H with the engine volume always set to max even if the volume is down all the way just so it deafens players around it
That wouldent help much. It's aerodynamic simply are not designed for high manuverabilty. It would most likely enter a flat spin pulling more than 20 degrees aoa.
The thing is... good luck manuevering at Mach 3. Especially in War Thunder (your plane is basically made of legos)
I could turn a Yer-2 tighter than the MiG-25.
World of tanks if it is a plane game: "balanced enough for a Tier VIII premium"
bro I understand you, i went through that problem in World Of Tanks Blitz too
world of warplanes somehow existing:
@@MarkStillPlays yea ik but its kinda dead snd people prob dont know it even exists, thats why I said WoT and of WoW
that jet shown reached mach 3. then promptly vibrated its airframe to end of service
No, mig25 and mig31 never reached mach 3, it’s a myth. Fastest it has ever flown was Mach 2.9
@ ah right, thanks for the info! even so, Mig 25 still vibrated itself to death if it went full beans for too long
@@Lwaww, no, its max reported speed was mach 3.2, comparable to such of the sr-71, it was not safe to surpass mach 2.8, but it could
@JoaoLuizLima-xw1nd no, max speed is 2,82 mach, which is 3000 km/h, it never reached over Mach 3. Mack 3,2 was theoretical speed it could reach, but they never let pilots do it because engines would just explode.
@@Lwawwthats what they said, "could"
You forgot to mention the fact that it could only go at that speed for 3 mins, and they had to scrap the engines after that
Source?
Those long range missiles may be inaccurate, but god DAMN they really pu the *_L O N G_* in there
Su 27 enters chat
*Takes the whole match to get up to speed, loses it in one turn*
The mig 25 was the anti SR-71 that’s what they made it for at least. Still a little slower but close enough for a lock on
Still never shot down tho, so that didn’t work.
No
It wasnt
It was made to deal with the XB 70s
The ussr though that the us would have hundreds-thousends of them soon
It would shoot RS-71 in head on. Haven't WT taught you how short range the missiles are when fired in rear hemisphere?
FYI: in simple terms, the Mig 25 was only a formidable fighter until it fell into American hands. A deserting Russian pilot escaped the USSR flying one of these, landing it in an American air base in Japan, after that it was bought to light that its large wings were not meant for Manoeuvrability, instead they were to keep the extremely heavy fighter in the air. And even its top speed would cause the engines to overheat in just a few mins. Mustard made a great video on both this plane and the f-15, if you want to hear the full story.
It not a fighter, it was built as an interceptor to attack high attitude bomber. It only need high acceleration and speed
This is indeed true, however in regards to warthunder I don’t think that the reusability or maintainability of your aircraft will matter much when matches don’t last long and you almost always die early in match or don’t return to base
Because Mig-25 is a Hight speed intercepter not a jet fighter, it can only hit and run, the wings will likely break if it turn in high speed
While searching for gold, we lost a diamond
Didn't even give Mustard some credit
Yeah
Mustard baller
Mustard ballin
When you remember it could only pull 2-3 G's and would be a nightmare to play
Это бред, информация откуда?
@vladpodolny3143 When America got the Mig-25, they did testing and found thst the bad materials that the Mig 25 was made of could at max pull 2.2 with external fuel tanks which it almost always carried due to the range issues faces by the inefficient engines. Look it up. 2.2 normal load and 4.5 max without those fuel tanks. And at speeds like mach 2.5 max (as any higher would cause the engines to wear down and degrade since they were meant for cruise missiles). That little pull at speeds of mach 2.5 would be around 2 degrees per second max turn which would make it painful to play and a easy target for Amraams and Phoenix missiles.
Mig 25 pilot instructor: To fly this bad boy, you have to fly so fast but not too fast.
Egyptian Intelegence of Gamal abd el Nasser,
Who won the political war
And yet the F-15 is better in every aspect.
And then he proceeds to explain for f15 completely dunked on it
The mig 25 is like the thrust 2 go fast as frick in straight line you can't turn and don't even think about slowing down as you gonna take 5 mins to speed back up
Откуда информация? Что за бред ты пишешь?
@@vladpodolny3143from when the U.S. recovered/captured a MiG 25 irl
“Saini Peninsula” 💀
Such a clear video 😮😮😮. I could almost see the wood screws.
F-15: Hold my beer
Bruhhh The mig 25 was an interceptor. It was meant to intercept high flying super sonic bombers or something not engage in dog fights.
f15: fighter aircraft designed for multi-role and fighter aircraft. better at fights.
mig-25: interceptor designed only to be able to catch up to a mach 3 bomber currently being developed by us.
by soviet doctrine, they would never meet.
Iraqi mig25s : Hold my r40
Search up for samura air battle
@@ali-haider5788iraqi migs actually took down a F-15
@@caesar-q6jDo you have evidence to confirm this?
I love my precious flying brick it was designed to be an interceptor for being the fastest, mysterious and that's it 🥰
F-15E: laughs hysterically. You are nothing compared to me!!
the US really over estimated the Mig-25 by creating the F-15E, literally creating a solution to a problem that never existed
@@SeaCatMeow_ no the mig-25 was the reason why the F-15 was built in the first place
@@Twiggo_The_Foxxothey over estimated the capabilities of the MiG 25 so they built the f 15
@@EX1ND-z9d bro the mig-35 was created in the 2010s
@@Twiggo_The_Foxxo it was a typo I meant MiG 25
The footage from the video was from a small channel called “mustard” he makes a lot of good aviation vids.
it was also an flying bricks and the early models could only carry SARH missles, it was meant to be an interceptor not a fighter
Release the eagle 🦅
Its going to be terrible ingame BUT it still deserves it’s spot imo. My all time favorite aircraft
They legit captured one of these planes and found it was actually shit
The MiG-25 was an actual fucking brick with wings.
There were many variants that can defo be incorporated into the game
cool flying brick but such engine's were needed just to lift it off the ground and it couldnt even go mach 3 for longer than 2-3 minutes without its engines melting away
Y’all understand that F15 flies at Mach 2.5, just 400km/h short of the mig 25/31 so any missile launched from F15 or other fast jets would catch it. Also F104 is in the game at 9.3 so it won’t be that unbalanced
Honestly when I was in the airforce and learning different countries aircraft this one was my favorite sucks they haven't added it
In reality the plane turned out to be just a rocket with wings attached to it
They would blow up in realistic
If the MiG-25 is being added, they better add the YF-12
The MIG-25 is a beast. It is a powerful interceptor but the radar look-down capability is not the best if there even is any at all
New era of stratosphere runners
My dad was a F14 RIO from 86-90
The mig 25 was the biggest threat they trained for up to the point when we studied the one that defected
After that they realized it was more or less a paper tiger
It was a flying shit brick, all it could do was go fast 😂. There's a reason why the russians never used it for anything besides an interceptor role. It's a baby sr-71
@@thecanadian9182I mean it was developed for the sole purpose to intercept American stealth bombers no one said it was an attack aircraft
@@mihawks_pupilIt was meant to intercept XB-70 Valkyries, but those never made it to fruition
@@thecanadian9182Because there wasn't an major airwar for the ussr since korea mate.Plus the iraqi did score kills with em against the collition
@Sunshine-sl3kr there wasn't a need nor a demand for it to begin with.
Wether it was built to shoot down heavy bombers or not aircraft of the Era could've 100% done it.
The us are the ones who revealed it was a flying shit brick, because that's all it was meant for, to be fast and have a radar.
Whether or not it got used in a war, it still would've been a flying shit brick. Lack Lustre turning.
It was a fast flying shit brick and nothing else.
This thing can sling missiles and runaway
You have f-15e, it already flies like that
The F-15:Bet😈
It’ll never get that fast in a war Thunder match
Couldn’t hold claimed top speed for long (5 minutes) due to the plane destroying itself from overheating at 2.8 mach. The designed cruising speed is 2.3 mach which is a standard cruising speed for most jets.
The US did get a Foxbat from a defector that flew to Japan and landed the plane which the US government took for researching.
The cruising speed for an f15 is normally only 570 mph compared to the mig 25 that averaged at about 1800 mph. Not even speaking of the major difference in altitude.
U know that the F-4 culd Go more Then twice the Speed of Sound
Y'all know that this plane is over half the max speed of the game?
Issue with adding it to WT. It has no look down radar, meaning it would hug the ground in game and can't fly at speeds faster than about mach 1.3. That combined with using R-40 SARH would just make it a worse Phantom on the Soviet team lol. MiG-31 would be a way better choice IMO
The no look down radar was due to the fact it was supposed to intercept high speed and high altitude bombers such as the XB-70, sadly for them the US Switch to a fast and low approach after the unfortunate failure of the XB-70
Are we forgetting the F15 exists? 😊
MUSTARD MENTIONED RAHHHH🌭🌭🌭🌭🌭🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
They should add MIG-25 But if you go to fast the wings break off
The Mig-25 would tear apart its engines when full afterburner
Blackbird: ok, challenge accepted
Bro leaked Zionism classified documents for short vid💀💀
Maps would be too small for it
yeah but then the engines needed replacement after only a couple flights
We already have the f15 which built in response to the mig 25, the only advantage it has over the f15 is speed at altitude and that won't really matter in wt unless everyone starts space climbing
USA: Mm fast lets make a Plane that fly with out wings and Shoot down a satellite with a Mini GAU-8 avenger
Mig 25 (goes mach 3)
Engines 💀💀💀💀💀💀🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💥💥🧨🧨
Bud steers like a fucking ship tho
They should add the F-22 with the data they thought of and let the forums do the rest
the F15 was made to counter this supposed "super fighter" but the mig 25 ended up beiing just an interceptor while the us just made the TRUE super fighter.
That was not supposed to be a super fighter. It was developed as interceptor from the beggining
Both MiG-25 and F-15 are great planes with its own roles. There is no reason to competing, whose planes a better
@@Sc1ence_Amateurthere were a lot of reasons to compare especially given the cold war, the comparison is quite literslly what made the F-15 exist, as OP said
@@Sc1ence_Amateurnah mig25 is dogshit
@@Lwaww that's a "Foxbat", actually, not the "Dogshit"
@ you didn’t get my comment right?
Sure a jet might not be able to catch up, but a missle can
The Mig-25s slower brother is already ingame, it is the Tornado
Most mach-capable aircraft are ridiculously fast at high altitudes. That thing would fall apart going that fast at sea level.
So uhh, the Mig-25 would prove useless. It's only built for speed, so turns barely, it's radar and avionics are old, and armament was small. It'e easily be beaten by even F-5's.
f-109 moment
If this is your argument then the sr 71 is useless
@@theocelot3957 The SR71 was strictly Reconnaissance, there would be no reason for it to fight unless it was self-defense. which already would've been hard to catch up and lock with its hypersonic and stealth technology.
@@theocelot3957 besides reconisance quite littirally
In war thunder it is useless@@theocelot3957
I can recognise that voice anywhere, the video is from a channel called "Mustard"
we are just not ready yet I guess.
The only thing I need now is the Eurofighter Typhoon.
They could only really add the mig-31, the 25 is not something we want.
It had a max g limit of 3.0 under “combat conditions” and would ingest its own engines above Mach 2.6
Even adding the standert 1.5 for g loading
Its 4.5g
Worse then props
The Egyptian pilots with russian aircraft is a unbreakable bound
They can fly high and fast but they cant turn for shit
I've got a feeling it's because it's a flying brick who has literally only one trick, and that's going fast. I believe they also had the problem phantoms did where they don't have guns. Not that getting the nose on target would be easy anyways though I guess. Wouldn't be disappointed if they skipped the 25 and went straight for the 31
Good thing the mig-25 can’t tear apart it’s engines in game
Mig 23 is the grandfather of F15 jets😂
It was a paper tiger that burned it's own engines out, was full of technical issues, unreliable and not really fit for service but had the resources to keep them going so
And then the MiGs literally fell apart mid air
MiG on their way to make a jet that goes mach 3 and explodes
This would probably be a vehicle in one of the “Dreams come true” events, this thing is heavy as shit because they couldn’t source enough titanium for mass production so most of it is a nickle-steel alloy, and it’s missiles were primarily designed for shooting down B-52s and the proposed XB-70, a Vark would probably beat it in a dogfight
US Mains: no nerf that to shi.. is to fast OMG Rebecca (breathe heavy)
Those things are scary. You can stand up in its exhausts. That’s how big the engines are
Me knowing im going to find slander here because anything thats Russian or soviet will always have 90% of people feel the need to slander it: 💀
IRL they had mechanical issues, so they could not be used to their full effect, in WT they would not have those issues and thus should be placed at 14.0
That's why US Military start working hard of new Jets. When this jet just showed up in middle East.
I think for an April fools update every biplane should go Mach 9, and then every jet goes at most 400 km/h
and after about a minute his engines started to burn and he landed just so that he was rendered unusable
They should make all the US abrams start with desert camo and then unlock the olive drab later
Let me introduce You to the F-15 strike eagle
The reason its the same with planes like Yf-12, too much fast, but too worse maneouveravility
It was the sr-71 with missiles it's top speed was Mach 3.2 the sr-71's was Mach 3.3
Considering its engines would literally tear themselves apart at that speed, I think it would honestly be a balanced addition in modern war thunder with engine overheating problems modelled.
What a formitable opponent for my F-15J