Why isn't the MiG-25 in game?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 янв 2025

Комментарии • 897

  • @cubeofcrabs
    @cubeofcrabs Месяц назад +8605

    where are the leaked documents when we need them

    • @buff_chicken
      @buff_chicken Месяц назад +176

      *pulls put folder*
      How much you offering?

    • @Jeffy206
      @Jeffy206 Месяц назад

      ⁠@@buff_chicken 5000 Ge and 3 150% research boosters

    • @Noahtheboa-73
      @Noahtheboa-73 Месяц назад +128

      I got 5 bucks and a pack of gummy worms.

    • @Tudachani_fr
      @Tudachani_fr Месяц назад +54

      Sold!

    • @Easty86
      @Easty86 Месяц назад +40

      Objection I got 20 and a bar of Snickers

  • @Casual330
    @Casual330 Месяц назад +5232

    They should add MiG-31, when someone remembers it existed

    • @Alex_Eggers
      @Alex_Eggers Месяц назад +20

      huh?

    • @Spartan_frog
      @Spartan_frog Месяц назад +50

      Dude the Mig does exist and it’s my fav for interception

    • @theberry-p9g
      @theberry-p9g Месяц назад +72

      i just searched jt up that is literaly a f15 with a red star 😭

    • @Spartan_frog
      @Spartan_frog Месяц назад +8

      @ yeah but it’s a little faster when it came out now it’s slower

    • @plymouth258
      @plymouth258 Месяц назад +44

      Mig31 Will be the absolute Bias, basically he have the one of the top 5 best radar for a fighter in the world, and flying high, mach 2 and launching r37m

  • @MiJi_29
    @MiJi_29 Месяц назад +3319

    Once Gaijin added this, there's no turning back when the whole match is a Manned Cruise Missile with Missiles 💀

    • @Tir33nts343
      @Tir33nts343 Месяц назад +41

      The f104 exists

    • @ArialArialArial
      @ArialArialArial Месяц назад +2

      AHAHAH

    • @aounenzolx4072
      @aounenzolx4072 Месяц назад +33

      ⁠@@Tir33nts343bro the F-104 has no chance against a MIG-25 the F-104 has no chance of catching up with it or going as high as the MIG-25

    • @alibirescuer5275
      @alibirescuer5275 Месяц назад +1

      @@aounenzolx4072its not compared but stated that similar plane is in the game

    • @AdrianOkay
      @AdrianOkay Месяц назад

      ​@@aounenzolx4072 hook up a f104 with a modern radar and missiles and we'll see about that

  • @blackshadow5875
    @blackshadow5875 Месяц назад +1877

    Warthunder just won’t let it go above Mach 1.5 without destroying the aircraft

    • @DecayLe4
      @DecayLe4 Месяц назад +96

      irl at its highest altitude it can go around mach 2.4-2.6 as its top speed, but at ground level its much much slower, just like every aircraft.

    • @DecayLe4
      @DecayLe4 Месяц назад +45

      the mig-23 can already go mach 2.4, but it goes mach 1.1-1.2 at low altitude

    • @DecayLe4
      @DecayLe4 Месяц назад +13

      btw the mig-25 top speed wws theoretically mach 3 but its engines broke if it went past mach 2.4-2.6

    • @WldntULike2Know
      @WldntULike2Know Месяц назад +1

      @@DecayLe4not even that half the time is much like the MiG-31 would melt long before then due to the poor materials used in the airframe.

    • @nikolaideianov5092
      @nikolaideianov5092 Месяц назад +1

      You do know they arent allowed to fly over mach 2.8?
      Reason is that the engine exuast becomes very high in engine parts and molten metal at these speeds

  • @martinwellhoefer9159
    @martinwellhoefer9159 Месяц назад +2190

    If the mig 25 was added in war thunder it would be dead on arrival.

    • @lemieux-z8933
      @lemieux-z8933 Месяц назад +117

      You ain't escaping a Phoenix launched from a tomcat flying at Mach 1.6 at 30k feet without disintegrating the jet lol

    • @Guywithabadenglish
      @Guywithabadenglish Месяц назад +30

      ​@@lemieux-z8933Turns out, it is.

    • @lukasvillar9328
      @lukasvillar9328 Месяц назад +19

      Just like in real life.

    • @jedinight235
      @jedinight235 Месяц назад +21

      who cares, add it anyway

    • @TheDutie
      @TheDutie Месяц назад +67

      Since the f15 is already in game and that jet was basically purpose built to counter tha thing you might be right
      Would still be a cool addition

  • @Sc1ence_Amateur
    @Sc1ence_Amateur Месяц назад +694

    Guys don't argue, it's great peice of engineering, and was made as interceptor for airdefence purposes (check history of developing). It ain't fighter jet, it just needs high velocity and altitude, like a fast reusable missile.
    As a man of science myself, i proud of scientists and constructors, who made this plane
    P.S. Also it had roles of bomber and reconnaissance bomber after modernization

    • @nilajjana84
      @nilajjana84 Месяц назад +19

      Man you are a real gem for science lots of respect for you

    • @MarkMuhammad190
      @MarkMuhammad190 Месяц назад +5

      Not a great piece if you realize how much they slacked off. Aircraft made of steel with longer maintenance time than modern aircraft is insane.

    • @Sc1ence_Amateur
      @Sc1ence_Amateur Месяц назад +15

      @@MarkMuhammad190 i mean, nowadays, they ofcoarse lose to modern tech, but back then...
      Also, if a vehicle have that much maintenance time, isn't it a well done job?)

    • @AngMon-vq7wx
      @AngMon-vq7wx Месяц назад +1

      ​@@MarkMuhammad190Maybe the maintenance took longer because it's an old aircraft?

    • @Billy-BobXIV
      @Billy-BobXIV Месяц назад +6

      It’s not exactly bad, but as impressive as it was, with super high speed and all, it was not amazing. It had very unreliable engines, a very heavy body, poor maneuverability, and an outdated radar and avionics system.

  • @really14444
    @really14444 Месяц назад +1575

    IRL soviet bias

    • @FIFOFA-0002
      @FIFOFA-0002 Месяц назад +54

      And the push factor of the f15 ❤

    • @Floorboard.
      @Floorboard. Месяц назад

      ​@@FIFOFA-0002huh

    • @THE_Dildozer.
      @THE_Dildozer. Месяц назад +6

      Still worse than the U.S. Response tho. F-15.

    • @MatsDahl-tt4ln
      @MatsDahl-tt4ln Месяц назад +49

      If you watch the full vid you will realise its not as good

    • @explodingkat8526
      @explodingkat8526 Месяц назад +48

      heavy piece of junk, that's why it needed to edit the rest of craps out

  • @Lockinhardenemy
    @Lockinhardenemy Месяц назад +49

    You know what the mig-25 is like?
    The F-104 on steroids

  • @karlthedogwithakar98k95
    @karlthedogwithakar98k95 Месяц назад +505

    The F-15 can go Mach 2.5 so it doesn’t make a lot of since to not add MIG-25 it’s direct counterpart

    • @Orion_179
      @Orion_179 Месяц назад +33

      F15E in game can go mach 2.7 and F-111F can go mach 2.84

    • @Thatguy131-yp5cj
      @Thatguy131-yp5cj Месяц назад +20

      I think it’s the fact the mig-25 can go mac 2.5 easily and for much longer times than a f-15 which would
      Never make that speed when loaded with ordinance.

    • @Nexsoxs
      @Nexsoxs Месяц назад +46

      ​@@Thatguy131-yp5cj I don't think you guys really want the mig 25, dude the radar is dog shit, and the plane can't pull 4.3 Gs at even a moderate speed without ripping itself apart.

    • @Thatguy131-yp5cj
      @Thatguy131-yp5cj Месяц назад +25

      @@Nexsoxs pulling tight maneuvers isn’t required for an interceptor meant to volley off missiles and run meanwhile the saphir-25 was suitable for the high altitude and decent range but the mig-25 would’ve been guided in by ground radars anyway, the Russian mig-25s even had advanced computers linked to the radars that flew the plane itself to the targets with minimal pilot intervention. For its time and what it was designed to do it was very good. Swedish radars even picked up mig-25s as close as 2 miles behind sr-71s well within missile range for the r-40s.

    • @DoguQ
      @DoguQ Месяц назад +2

      F-15 goes mach 2.5 while trying his ass off and without any ordnance.
      Its not comparable to mig-25.

  • @santiagomendez246
    @santiagomendez246 Месяц назад +246

    This would be a great opportunity to make a "what if" MiG-25 Variant, maybe for an april fools update along with other "what if" vehicles. It would be a theoretical variant, one made with minor adjustments to its design, like using a titanium alloy instead of the heavy nickel-steel one, slapping it better avionics and tweaking the engines a bit so they don't fucking explode while going mach 3.

    • @TribitFanOpex
      @TribitFanOpex Месяц назад

      They would implode.

    • @ThelatestAbrams
      @ThelatestAbrams Месяц назад +6

      Maybe we could call it the SR-71 blackbird and have Lockheed develop it

    • @santiagomendez246
      @santiagomendez246 Месяц назад

      @@ThelatestAbrams nah, they'd be missing the neutron style (proxying the Titanium sale)

    • @uncreativename826
      @uncreativename826 Месяц назад

      XF-84H with the engine volume always set to max even if the volume is down all the way just so it deafens players around it

    • @icancraftsomething
      @icancraftsomething Месяц назад

      That wouldent help much. It's aerodynamic simply are not designed for high manuverabilty. It would most likely enter a flat spin pulling more than 20 degrees aoa.

  • @Tom-H1
    @Tom-H1 8 дней назад +11

    The thing is... good luck manuevering at Mach 3. Especially in War Thunder (your plane is basically made of legos)

    • @sztypettto
      @sztypettto 6 дней назад

      I could turn a Yer-2 tighter than the MiG-25.

  • @marcusKekse1111
    @marcusKekse1111 Месяц назад +21

    World of tanks if it is a plane game: "balanced enough for a Tier VIII premium"

    • @Omersahab-cr8rj
      @Omersahab-cr8rj Месяц назад

      bro I understand you, i went through that problem in World Of Tanks Blitz too

    • @MarkStillPlays
      @MarkStillPlays 28 дней назад +2

      world of warplanes somehow existing:

    • @marcusKekse1111
      @marcusKekse1111 27 дней назад

      @@MarkStillPlays yea ik but its kinda dead snd people prob dont know it even exists, thats why I said WoT and of WoW

  • @Magic_Birb
    @Magic_Birb Месяц назад +41

    that jet shown reached mach 3. then promptly vibrated its airframe to end of service

    • @Lwaww
      @Lwaww Месяц назад

      No, mig25 and mig31 never reached mach 3, it’s a myth. Fastest it has ever flown was Mach 2.9

    • @Magic_Birb
      @Magic_Birb Месяц назад

      @ ah right, thanks for the info! even so, Mig 25 still vibrated itself to death if it went full beans for too long

    • @JoaoLuizLima-xw1nd
      @JoaoLuizLima-xw1nd Месяц назад +2

      ​@@Lwaww, no, its max reported speed was mach 3.2, comparable to such of the sr-71, it was not safe to surpass mach 2.8, but it could

    • @Lwaww
      @Lwaww Месяц назад

      @JoaoLuizLima-xw1nd no, max speed is 2,82 mach, which is 3000 km/h, it never reached over Mach 3. Mack 3,2 was theoretical speed it could reach, but they never let pilots do it because engines would just explode.

    • @n0stalg1a90
      @n0stalg1a90 Месяц назад +1

      ⁠​⁠@@Lwawwthats what they said, "could"

  • @ddb2316
    @ddb2316 29 дней назад +6

    You forgot to mention the fact that it could only go at that speed for 3 mins, and they had to scrap the engines after that

  • @oofman1911
    @oofman1911 Месяц назад +33

    Those long range missiles may be inaccurate, but god DAMN they really pu the *_L O N G_* in there

  • @joachimhupe4018
    @joachimhupe4018 Месяц назад +31

    *Takes the whole match to get up to speed, loses it in one turn*

  • @colemair5367
    @colemair5367 Месяц назад +8

    The mig 25 was the anti SR-71 that’s what they made it for at least. Still a little slower but close enough for a lock on

    • @TheFlamingSalamander782
      @TheFlamingSalamander782 Месяц назад +1

      Still never shot down tho, so that didn’t work.

    • @nikolaideianov5092
      @nikolaideianov5092 Месяц назад +5

      No
      It wasnt
      It was made to deal with the XB 70s
      The ussr though that the us would have hundreds-thousends of them soon

    • @ГеоргийМурзич
      @ГеоргийМурзич 18 дней назад

      It would shoot RS-71 in head on. Haven't WT taught you how short range the missiles are when fired in rear hemisphere?

  • @tiborpalmai2653
    @tiborpalmai2653 Месяц назад +40

    FYI: in simple terms, the Mig 25 was only a formidable fighter until it fell into American hands. A deserting Russian pilot escaped the USSR flying one of these, landing it in an American air base in Japan, after that it was bought to light that its large wings were not meant for Manoeuvrability, instead they were to keep the extremely heavy fighter in the air. And even its top speed would cause the engines to overheat in just a few mins. Mustard made a great video on both this plane and the f-15, if you want to hear the full story.

    • @spooki9632
      @spooki9632 Месяц назад +8

      It not a fighter, it was built as an interceptor to attack high attitude bomber. It only need high acceleration and speed

    • @BaoBao0923
      @BaoBao0923 Месяц назад +4

      This is indeed true, however in regards to warthunder I don’t think that the reusability or maintainability of your aircraft will matter much when matches don’t last long and you almost always die early in match or don’t return to base

  • @takiemperor7363
    @takiemperor7363 29 дней назад

    Because Mig-25 is a Hight speed intercepter not a jet fighter, it can only hit and run, the wings will likely break if it turn in high speed

  • @AdwaitKharade
    @AdwaitKharade Месяц назад +5

    While searching for gold, we lost a diamond

  • @Pyrite1914
    @Pyrite1914 Месяц назад +10

    Didn't even give Mustard some credit

  • @AtticusMoreno-oy6nd
    @AtticusMoreno-oy6nd Месяц назад +3

    When you remember it could only pull 2-3 G's and would be a nightmare to play

    • @vladpodolny3143
      @vladpodolny3143 Месяц назад

      Это бред, информация откуда?

    • @AtticusMoreno-oy6nd
      @AtticusMoreno-oy6nd Месяц назад +3

      @vladpodolny3143 When America got the Mig-25, they did testing and found thst the bad materials that the Mig 25 was made of could at max pull 2.2 with external fuel tanks which it almost always carried due to the range issues faces by the inefficient engines. Look it up. 2.2 normal load and 4.5 max without those fuel tanks. And at speeds like mach 2.5 max (as any higher would cause the engines to wear down and degrade since they were meant for cruise missiles). That little pull at speeds of mach 2.5 would be around 2 degrees per second max turn which would make it painful to play and a easy target for Amraams and Phoenix missiles.

  • @Bruh-zc3qs
    @Bruh-zc3qs Месяц назад +4

    Mig 25 pilot instructor: To fly this bad boy, you have to fly so fast but not too fast.

  • @osehesham1185
    @osehesham1185 Месяц назад +3

    Egyptian Intelegence of Gamal abd el Nasser,
    Who won the political war

  • @NATOenthusiast
    @NATOenthusiast 21 день назад +1

    And yet the F-15 is better in every aspect.

  • @Mannskas
    @Mannskas Месяц назад +3

    And then he proceeds to explain for f15 completely dunked on it

  • @Watermeloncat575
    @Watermeloncat575 Месяц назад +1

    The mig 25 is like the thrust 2 go fast as frick in straight line you can't turn and don't even think about slowing down as you gonna take 5 mins to speed back up

    • @vladpodolny3143
      @vladpodolny3143 Месяц назад

      Откуда информация? Что за бред ты пишешь?

    • @EX1ND-z9d
      @EX1ND-z9d Месяц назад

      @@vladpodolny3143from when the U.S. recovered/captured a MiG 25 irl

  • @splinterun9005
    @splinterun9005 Месяц назад +2

    “Saini Peninsula” 💀

  • @RadBruce.
    @RadBruce. Месяц назад +5

    Such a clear video 😮😮😮. I could almost see the wood screws.

  • @cheesyfromindonesia9969
    @cheesyfromindonesia9969 Месяц назад +7

    F-15: Hold my beer

    • @Diamond-hm6uv
      @Diamond-hm6uv Месяц назад +8

      Bruhhh The mig 25 was an interceptor. It was meant to intercept high flying super sonic bombers or something not engage in dog fights.

    • @flakbusenjoyer
      @flakbusenjoyer Месяц назад +5

      f15: fighter aircraft designed for multi-role and fighter aircraft. better at fights.
      mig-25: interceptor designed only to be able to catch up to a mach 3 bomber currently being developed by us.
      by soviet doctrine, they would never meet.

    • @ali-haider5788
      @ali-haider5788 Месяц назад +1

      Iraqi mig25s : Hold my r40
      Search up for samura air battle

    • @caesar-q6j
      @caesar-q6j 29 дней назад +3

      ​@@ali-haider5788iraqi migs actually took down a F-15

    • @mujaheedgoni9712
      @mujaheedgoni9712 20 дней назад

      ​@@caesar-q6jDo you have evidence to confirm this?

  • @Panderer3521
    @Panderer3521 Месяц назад +2

    I love my precious flying brick it was designed to be an interceptor for being the fastest, mysterious and that's it 🥰

  • @itaclips6698
    @itaclips6698 Месяц назад +13

    F-15E: laughs hysterically. You are nothing compared to me!!

    • @SeaCatMeow_
      @SeaCatMeow_ Месяц назад

      the US really over estimated the Mig-25 by creating the F-15E, literally creating a solution to a problem that never existed

    • @Twiggo_The_Foxxo
      @Twiggo_The_Foxxo Месяц назад +3

      ​@@SeaCatMeow_ no the mig-25 was the reason why the F-15 was built in the first place

    • @EX1ND-z9d
      @EX1ND-z9d Месяц назад

      @@Twiggo_The_Foxxothey over estimated the capabilities of the MiG 25 so they built the f 15

    • @Twiggo_The_Foxxo
      @Twiggo_The_Foxxo Месяц назад

      @@EX1ND-z9d bro the mig-35 was created in the 2010s

    • @EX1ND-z9d
      @EX1ND-z9d Месяц назад

      @@Twiggo_The_Foxxo it was a typo I meant MiG 25

  • @yoshiplays408
    @yoshiplays408 Месяц назад +2

    The footage from the video was from a small channel called “mustard” he makes a lot of good aviation vids.

  • @M22LocustGuy
    @M22LocustGuy Месяц назад +1

    it was also an flying bricks and the early models could only carry SARH missles, it was meant to be an interceptor not a fighter

  • @Enzo-fk1tx
    @Enzo-fk1tx Месяц назад +8

    Release the eagle 🦅

  • @WeBall_1204
    @WeBall_1204 Месяц назад +2

    Its going to be terrible ingame BUT it still deserves it’s spot imo. My all time favorite aircraft

  • @bulattankman9907
    @bulattankman9907 Месяц назад +1

    They legit captured one of these planes and found it was actually shit

  • @Eli_Ross
    @Eli_Ross 6 дней назад

    The MiG-25 was an actual fucking brick with wings.

  • @kingcola7555
    @kingcola7555 Месяц назад +1

    There were many variants that can defo be incorporated into the game

  • @_zeux
    @_zeux Месяц назад

    cool flying brick but such engine's were needed just to lift it off the ground and it couldnt even go mach 3 for longer than 2-3 minutes without its engines melting away

  • @Lwaww
    @Lwaww Месяц назад +3

    Y’all understand that F15 flies at Mach 2.5, just 400km/h short of the mig 25/31 so any missile launched from F15 or other fast jets would catch it. Also F104 is in the game at 9.3 so it won’t be that unbalanced

  • @WckedShadw
    @WckedShadw Месяц назад +2

    Honestly when I was in the airforce and learning different countries aircraft this one was my favorite sucks they haven't added it

  • @kartontogej
    @kartontogej Месяц назад +7

    In reality the plane turned out to be just a rocket with wings attached to it

  • @ptgtdcr
    @ptgtdcr Месяц назад +1

    They would blow up in realistic

  • @rc_1234
    @rc_1234 Месяц назад +1

    If the MiG-25 is being added, they better add the YF-12

  • @stillanlean8842
    @stillanlean8842 Месяц назад +6

    The MIG-25 is a beast. It is a powerful interceptor but the radar look-down capability is not the best if there even is any at all

  • @rabbaniazzahra1784
    @rabbaniazzahra1784 Месяц назад +1

    New era of stratosphere runners

  • @Thunderage.
    @Thunderage. Месяц назад +7

    My dad was a F14 RIO from 86-90
    The mig 25 was the biggest threat they trained for up to the point when we studied the one that defected
    After that they realized it was more or less a paper tiger

    • @thecanadian9182
      @thecanadian9182 Месяц назад +1

      It was a flying shit brick, all it could do was go fast 😂. There's a reason why the russians never used it for anything besides an interceptor role. It's a baby sr-71

    • @mihawks_pupil
      @mihawks_pupil Месяц назад +1

      ​@@thecanadian9182I mean it was developed for the sole purpose to intercept American stealth bombers no one said it was an attack aircraft

    • @m1a1abramstank49
      @m1a1abramstank49 Месяц назад

      @@mihawks_pupilIt was meant to intercept XB-70 Valkyries, but those never made it to fruition

    • @Sunshine-sl3kr
      @Sunshine-sl3kr 21 день назад

      ​@@thecanadian9182Because there wasn't an major airwar for the ussr since korea mate.Plus the iraqi did score kills with em against the collition

    • @thecanadian9182
      @thecanadian9182 21 день назад

      @Sunshine-sl3kr there wasn't a need nor a demand for it to begin with.
      Wether it was built to shoot down heavy bombers or not aircraft of the Era could've 100% done it.
      The us are the ones who revealed it was a flying shit brick, because that's all it was meant for, to be fast and have a radar.
      Whether or not it got used in a war, it still would've been a flying shit brick. Lack Lustre turning.
      It was a fast flying shit brick and nothing else.

  • @bulletbullet3280
    @bulletbullet3280 Месяц назад +1

    This thing can sling missiles and runaway

  • @Devious_asf
    @Devious_asf Месяц назад +1

    You have f-15e, it already flies like that

  • @TheWatchPartyForever
    @TheWatchPartyForever 17 дней назад

    The F-15:Bet😈

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 Месяц назад +1

    It’ll never get that fast in a war Thunder match

  • @thisguy9458
    @thisguy9458 Месяц назад +7

    Couldn’t hold claimed top speed for long (5 minutes) due to the plane destroying itself from overheating at 2.8 mach. The designed cruising speed is 2.3 mach which is a standard cruising speed for most jets.
    The US did get a Foxbat from a defector that flew to Japan and landed the plane which the US government took for researching.

    • @josephrichards4231
      @josephrichards4231 Месяц назад

      The cruising speed for an f15 is normally only 570 mph compared to the mig 25 that averaged at about 1800 mph. Not even speaking of the major difference in altitude.

  • @Spam134
    @Spam134 Месяц назад +2

    U know that the F-4 culd Go more Then twice the Speed of Sound

  • @WTclips001
    @WTclips001 Месяц назад +1

    Y'all know that this plane is over half the max speed of the game?

  • @markthegamer5304
    @markthegamer5304 Месяц назад

    Issue with adding it to WT. It has no look down radar, meaning it would hug the ground in game and can't fly at speeds faster than about mach 1.3. That combined with using R-40 SARH would just make it a worse Phantom on the Soviet team lol. MiG-31 would be a way better choice IMO
    The no look down radar was due to the fact it was supposed to intercept high speed and high altitude bombers such as the XB-70, sadly for them the US Switch to a fast and low approach after the unfortunate failure of the XB-70

  • @V13per
    @V13per Месяц назад +1

    Are we forgetting the F15 exists? 😊

  • @Russianbatteryplug
    @Russianbatteryplug Месяц назад +1

    MUSTARD MENTIONED RAHHHH🌭🌭🌭🌭🌭🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @Marshal-Commander-Fox
    @Marshal-Commander-Fox Месяц назад +1

    They should add MIG-25 But if you go to fast the wings break off

  • @cheesy4205
    @cheesy4205 Месяц назад +1

    The Mig-25 would tear apart its engines when full afterburner

  • @ethanchristianson4922
    @ethanchristianson4922 Месяц назад +1

    Blackbird: ok, challenge accepted

  • @anhappysisphus
    @anhappysisphus Месяц назад +3

    Bro leaked Zionism classified documents for short vid💀💀

  • @antonov5463
    @antonov5463 Месяц назад +2

    Maps would be too small for it

  • @dibsmatic
    @dibsmatic Месяц назад +3

    yeah but then the engines needed replacement after only a couple flights

  • @frog56414
    @frog56414 Месяц назад +2

    We already have the f15 which built in response to the mig 25, the only advantage it has over the f15 is speed at altitude and that won't really matter in wt unless everyone starts space climbing

  • @APFSDS131
    @APFSDS131 Месяц назад +1

    USA: Mm fast lets make a Plane that fly with out wings and Shoot down a satellite with a Mini GAU-8 avenger

  • @henrikaaseneriksen549
    @henrikaaseneriksen549 Месяц назад +2

    Mig 25 (goes mach 3)
    Engines 💀💀💀💀💀💀🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💥💥🧨🧨

  • @V4N9U15H.
    @V4N9U15H. Месяц назад +2

    Bud steers like a fucking ship tho

  • @DerSAIBOT
    @DerSAIBOT Месяц назад +2

    They should add the F-22 with the data they thought of and let the forums do the rest

  • @AlfredDane
    @AlfredDane Месяц назад +23

    the F15 was made to counter this supposed "super fighter" but the mig 25 ended up beiing just an interceptor while the us just made the TRUE super fighter.

    • @Sc1ence_Amateur
      @Sc1ence_Amateur Месяц назад +9

      That was not supposed to be a super fighter. It was developed as interceptor from the beggining
      Both MiG-25 and F-15 are great planes with its own roles. There is no reason to competing, whose planes a better

    • @Besieiro
      @Besieiro Месяц назад +2

      ​@@Sc1ence_Amateurthere were a lot of reasons to compare especially given the cold war, the comparison is quite literslly what made the F-15 exist, as OP said

    • @Lwaww
      @Lwaww Месяц назад

      @@Sc1ence_Amateurnah mig25 is dogshit

    • @Sc1ence_Amateur
      @Sc1ence_Amateur Месяц назад +1

      @@Lwaww that's a "Foxbat", actually, not the "Dogshit"

    • @Lwaww
      @Lwaww Месяц назад

      @ you didn’t get my comment right?

  • @mrhacker9109
    @mrhacker9109 Месяц назад +1

    Sure a jet might not be able to catch up, but a missle can

  • @Insulino36
    @Insulino36 Месяц назад +1

    The Mig-25s slower brother is already ingame, it is the Tornado

  • @carbonatedmayo
    @carbonatedmayo Месяц назад +1

    Most mach-capable aircraft are ridiculously fast at high altitudes. That thing would fall apart going that fast at sea level.

  • @th3turb0lag
    @th3turb0lag Месяц назад +125

    So uhh, the Mig-25 would prove useless. It's only built for speed, so turns barely, it's radar and avionics are old, and armament was small. It'e easily be beaten by even F-5's.

    • @Viper45-g2f
      @Viper45-g2f Месяц назад +11

      f-109 moment

    • @theocelot3957
      @theocelot3957 Месяц назад +23

      If this is your argument then the sr 71 is useless

    • @biggyfato7330
      @biggyfato7330 Месяц назад +33

      @@theocelot3957 The SR71 was strictly Reconnaissance, there would be no reason for it to fight unless it was self-defense. which already would've been hard to catch up and lock with its hypersonic and stealth technology.

    • @Viper45-g2f
      @Viper45-g2f Месяц назад +2

      @@theocelot3957 besides reconisance quite littirally

    • @content_101.
      @content_101. Месяц назад

      In war thunder it is useless​@@theocelot3957

  • @ZoR24
    @ZoR24 Месяц назад +3

    I can recognise that voice anywhere, the video is from a channel called "Mustard"

  • @maybe4549
    @maybe4549 Месяц назад +1

    we are just not ready yet I guess.

  • @perwollf
    @perwollf Месяц назад +1

    The only thing I need now is the Eurofighter Typhoon.

  • @KhanAitmatov2033
    @KhanAitmatov2033 Месяц назад +4

    They could only really add the mig-31, the 25 is not something we want.
    It had a max g limit of 3.0 under “combat conditions” and would ingest its own engines above Mach 2.6

    • @nikolaideianov5092
      @nikolaideianov5092 Месяц назад

      Even adding the standert 1.5 for g loading
      Its 4.5g
      Worse then props

  • @user-Bishoy
    @user-Bishoy Месяц назад

    The Egyptian pilots with russian aircraft is a unbreakable bound

  • @shulminsama3820
    @shulminsama3820 Месяц назад +3

    They can fly high and fast but they cant turn for shit

  • @itsgen8283
    @itsgen8283 Месяц назад +1

    I've got a feeling it's because it's a flying brick who has literally only one trick, and that's going fast. I believe they also had the problem phantoms did where they don't have guns. Not that getting the nose on target would be easy anyways though I guess. Wouldn't be disappointed if they skipped the 25 and went straight for the 31

  • @snaily_lunar
    @snaily_lunar Месяц назад +1

    Good thing the mig-25 can’t tear apart it’s engines in game

  • @mr._g_reyes385
    @mr._g_reyes385 Месяц назад +1

    Mig 23 is the grandfather of F15 jets😂

  • @-lightningwill-6014
    @-lightningwill-6014 Месяц назад +1

    It was a paper tiger that burned it's own engines out, was full of technical issues, unreliable and not really fit for service but had the resources to keep them going so

  • @Tir33nts343
    @Tir33nts343 Месяц назад +2

    And then the MiGs literally fell apart mid air

  • @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757
    @politicallyinaccuratetoast4757 Месяц назад +1

    MiG on their way to make a jet that goes mach 3 and explodes

  • @thepenman4865
    @thepenman4865 Месяц назад

    This would probably be a vehicle in one of the “Dreams come true” events, this thing is heavy as shit because they couldn’t source enough titanium for mass production so most of it is a nickle-steel alloy, and it’s missiles were primarily designed for shooting down B-52s and the proposed XB-70, a Vark would probably beat it in a dogfight

  • @lemonade4369
    @lemonade4369 Месяц назад +1

    US Mains: no nerf that to shi.. is to fast OMG Rebecca (breathe heavy)

  • @FNKB888
    @FNKB888 Месяц назад +1

    Those things are scary. You can stand up in its exhausts. That’s how big the engines are

  • @Stylescorey
    @Stylescorey Месяц назад +4

    Me knowing im going to find slander here because anything thats Russian or soviet will always have 90% of people feel the need to slander it: 💀

  • @tdofducksplays
    @tdofducksplays Месяц назад +1

    IRL they had mechanical issues, so they could not be used to their full effect, in WT they would not have those issues and thus should be placed at 14.0

  • @crusaderclarkplays5466
    @crusaderclarkplays5466 Месяц назад +1

    That's why US Military start working hard of new Jets. When this jet just showed up in middle East.

  • @Anti_Jamal11
    @Anti_Jamal11 Месяц назад +1

    I think for an April fools update every biplane should go Mach 9, and then every jet goes at most 400 km/h

  • @jakubbudka8120
    @jakubbudka8120 Месяц назад +7

    and after about a minute his engines started to burn and he landed just so that he was rendered unusable

  • @T1ger-tank
    @T1ger-tank Месяц назад +2

    They should make all the US abrams start with desert camo and then unlock the olive drab later

  • @JUANReyes-xj2sk
    @JUANReyes-xj2sk Месяц назад +1

    Let me introduce You to the F-15 strike eagle

  • @F22_Raptor-d6v
    @F22_Raptor-d6v Месяц назад +1

    The reason its the same with planes like Yf-12, too much fast, but too worse maneouveravility

  • @SU-30_SM2
    @SU-30_SM2 Месяц назад +1

    It was the sr-71 with missiles it's top speed was Mach 3.2 the sr-71's was Mach 3.3

  • @Xiodot
    @Xiodot Месяц назад +1

    Considering its engines would literally tear themselves apart at that speed, I think it would honestly be a balanced addition in modern war thunder with engine overheating problems modelled.

  • @phantomthiefjeff9667
    @phantomthiefjeff9667 Месяц назад +1

    What a formitable opponent for my F-15J