Usain Bolt VS Jesse Owens
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- #athletics #comparison #speed
Usain Bolt is a Jamaican retired sprinter, widely considered to be the greatest sprinter of all time. He is the world record holder in the 100 metres, 200 metres, and 4 × 100 metres relay.
An 8 time Olympic gold medallist, Bolt is the only sprinter to win Olympic 100 m and 200 m titles at three consecutive Olympics (2008, 2012, and 2016). He also won two 4 × 100 relay gold medals. He gained worldwide fame for his double sprint victory in world record times at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, which made him the first person to hold both records since fully automatic time became mandatory.
An 11 time World Champion, he won consecutive World Championship 100 m, 200 m and 4 × 100 metres relay gold medals from 2009 to 2015, with the exception of a 100 m false start in 2011. He is the most successful male athlete of the World Championships. Bolt is the first athlete to win four World Championship titles in the 200 m and is one of the most successful in the 100 m with three titles, being the first person to run sub-9.7s and sub-9.6s.
Bolt improved upon his second 100 m world record of 9.69 with 9.58 seconds in 2009 - the biggest improvement since the start of electronic timing. He has twice broken the 200 metres world record, setting 19.30 in 2008 and 19.19 in 2009.
Speed Comparison
Usain Bolt VS
Fastest Man on earth
Acceleration
3d comparison
Usain Bolt VS Average Normal People Regular
Athletics Speed
Track Speed
Speed 3D
Fastest Woman on the planet
100m 10.54
100m 10.54s
Running Fast
Fast Track and Field Athlete
Like this comment for a Usain Bolt vs Travis Scott, Kanye West etc... (so that he sees it) 🤩
kanye 🤣
Okay ! That is my next video, coming very very soon 😉
@@MotionAthleteUsain Bolt Vs MS Dhoni❤❤
Actually , hey did not. They had him running on dirt while Bolt ran on conventional track. Owens had a greater stride rate while Bolt had a great stride length while he was a notorious slow starter. Owens had a very upright stance, that allowed him to sustain his sprinting for the entire race. It would have been a lot closer with all the modern circumstances being equal. Owens was extremely explosive from the beginning while Bolt got explosive mid race.
considering that Owens ran on a loose cinders track, had no starting blocks, had much heavier and inferior equipment both in footwear and kit, all the modern advances in training, training equipment, nutrition, etc he was way ahead of his time
Don’t forget the beer he drank. And the juice bolt was on.
Owens for sure was ahead of his time, I believe he won the 100, 200, Long Jump & 4x100 (or maybe it was 400m) all in the same Olympics.
Usain Bolt is also way ahead of his time though. Looking at world record progressions from the 80s until just before Bolt's WR, a 9.58 shouldn't have come until 2070. Recent years show that as well, in Bolt's 9.58 race the second place runner Tyson Gay got a 9.71. In the last decade not a single runner has bested 9.71. 9.58 is WAY faster than what anyone is capable of right now, 15 years after Bolt's WR.
Not only that but also inferior training system, medical following up etc.
Honestly, it's expected progress. Owens is not greater than bolt. Every ms of improvement under 10s is a huge difference
A scientist who studies the movement of humans put together a model and it factored in all you mentioned and when owens stride and all factors where plugged in he was a step being bolt..... So this video is absolutely trash...
Owens and Bolt are GOATs for two completely different reasons.
the only problem with your statement is that GOAT means 1. you cant have GOATs.
So by your logic, different sports can't have different goats. One goat to rule them all. Different reasons, one was competing against nazi Germany, the other is fastest man ever, so far. Trolls always use semantics while trolling.
ok
@timn4481
In the phrase - he was one of the Greatest Of All Times if not THE Greatest Of All Time - we already have TWO ‘GOAT’s. 😆
Yes - see Auntoney’s reply. Jesse Owens came up during a time when racism was ridiculous off the charts. Still he made it to the US national team for the Olympics, and sent Hitler into spasms when he won in front of the Nazis. And yes - for his time period - the fastest. His contribution to ALL of the sports world is unforgettable, timeless.
@@timn4481 Personally, I don't subscribe to the phrase 'greatest of all time', just the greatest of their time. Bolt may be the fastest on track, but I can bet Owens had more resilience in his small toe than Bolt has in his entire body.
They actually did research and accounted for all the poor conditions Jesse Owens ran in and found that Usain Bolt would still be faster by .2-.3 seconds
ruclips.net/video/8COaMKbNrX0/видео.htmlsi=zyKeUQhgZrXYPsBv
I think they said that his theoretical time would be 9.83s. That's the same as Noah Lyles today
@@kingdinodragonite3470 sounds about right cos Bolt was spanking entire fields of elite athletes in an event that the entire globe of all races now compete in. Owens was swapping records with others at the time.
No sh$t
Did they account for his inability to blast gear all off-season?
I love Jesse, he was my idol and I got to meet him and get his autograph at the Jesse Owens Arco Games way back in the early '80's. He was the nicest guy!
>early '80's
He literally died in 1980.
@@MaxSaki373 ahahahahah
Jesse Owens is at a huge disadvantage due to running on hard soil,lack of blocks,old version of spikes,lack of modern technical knowledge about sprinting mechanics.
Maybe he could have broken 10 seconds easily if he was born today😮
I think I agree, he was extremely fast so I think that would make this a fairer race.
100% he would still have been one of the best if he was born in the same era.
Cinder, not soil.
Give him 2 months in today's format, and he probably still medals in the Olympics XD. Maybe not in '08, though.
And you haven't even mentioned the potpourri of PEDs that are required to compete at the top level of athletics these days.
JESSE OWENS BEAT HITLER. JESSE IS THE WINNER ❤ LOVE FROM ENGLAND 🏴
Hitler wasn't a sprinter mate
@@Connor6569Really???😱
Hitler was appreciative of Jesse Owens, unlike Roosevelt and American society.
@@ReblazeGaming Yes, that is correct.
@@Connor6569 No wonder he lost.
Bolt’s long strides are an advantage in any age, and Owens didn’t have access to today’s training methods, equipment or medical care. Both are still amazing athletes.
Usain should be honored to run beside the late Great Jesse Owens...RIP ❤❤
At least they had their greatest moments in the SAME stadium. Jesse 1936 an Usain 73 years later.
What are you talking about
Two great men renown. Thank you!
I remember the IAAF WC 2009 in Berlin.
The day with the 100 m run, I was in the Stadium.
9.58 WR.
Until now nobody could beat the time.
Shows how much modern training effects performance--its not just genetic ability 🙉
Edit: didn't mean to start a war in the replies. Most of ya'll are correct but in different ways. It is true that you can be limited by your genetic ability. But you can also become significantly faster (perhaps more than you would think) if you train properly and optimally
That's a conclusion that some people will have.
Bolt had god tier genetics, not sure what you’re talking about…
Lol always a hater around.🤫
@@Final_ActHe never said Bolt didn’t, it’s just very clear genetics aren’t the only thing that effect performance.
@@brianfrommars That's been common sense since the dawn of time. What's unfortunate is when people deny that genetics undoubtedly play the most important role in your potential and performance. Nothing trumps genetics.
"When talent doesn't work hard, hard work wins."
"Hard work beats talent"
Sadly, this couldn't be farther from the truth. That's just life, life is unfair. Talent doesn't need to work hard to compete, they just need to at least "work." What if talent works hard? Well, the answer is obvious.
Now, let me make it clear. Talent and hard work can be at equal levels, the difference is talent had to work nowhere near as hard as the hard worker to be at the same level.
Don't get me wrong, don't use genetics as an excuse for your lack of performance. Always work hard. Hard work guarantees success, but talent doesn't. Stay consistent.
"Hard work beats no work."
-Me
Comparing across decades is fun. For Jesse Owens to do what he did in the 1930's is incomparable.
Jesse is a legend. One of the greatest. I can understand all the disadvanteges he endures but he still won't have a chance against Usain Bolt. Physically superior. Bless you Mr. Owens.
I think modern day Jesse Owen would run 9.70
Bolt ran so fast he became balled at the end.
running animations lookd cool and it impersonates them
Let's give Owens a modern track, modern shoes, starter blocks and a professional career.
They did in-depth research comparisons to allow for the poor equipment, race rules technology, air quality and conditions Usain Bolt had to endure. And found he would have been 2 - 3 seconds faster than Jesse, all things being equal.
He’s running just like Bolt
I’d like to see Bolt against the guys that Jessie Owens smoked. Haha that would be brutal.
I found it cool the slow start of usain was paid attention to
His start is not slow
@@jayjordan7257 but he doesn't have a strong start either
@@jovaughnlaing7171bro he has one of the fastest 60m splits ever, it’s not top 1 but it is like top 3 or something. His prime start was very fast but as he got older his start was slower. If you want proof you can see the 2009 world championship where he ran the world record he beated Tyson gay in the start who is the top 2 fastest 100m sprinter of all time and then they had basically the same top end speed.
I think if you can hit 10.2 from a standing start on a cinder track wearing the clogs that Dutch kids lay out for Santa, you could break 10 seconds in todays tech without much stress.
yeah but how about half a second under 10?
@@timn4481Definitely not, bolt could probably run sub 10 regardless under the same conditions. Bolt has superior genetics on top of modern training and medicine
@@timn4481 I doubt a full half second, that's quite a gap, but I bet Jesse would have been in the 9.75-9.80 range.
@@ThomasNelson1977half a second is a large gap idk about all that
Jesse Owens time was impressive for then. Today, he’d also have better training and better nutrition. He’d be more muscular and explosive. 2024 Jesse Owens would be the fastest man ever.
Today? Are you serious, sorry to burst your bubble but he wouldn’t stand a chance today. Yes he had a few disadvantages and if he had better training and nutrition etc he would have done better but 6 metres better? That’s a HUGE stretch 😂 he was the greatest of his time, doesn’t mean he would all of a sudden to do better than Usain Bolt that’s another stretch.
@@hazerdxhd4373 It was the 100 yard, not 100 meter that JO ran. No one can say, for sure if JO could have beat UB. We will never know.
This did a GREAT job stimulating their style and movement.
It was realistic how Owens kept up with Bolt for the first 20 meters or so, then Bolt pulled away... that's generally how his races go!
***simulating
These videos are great, clearly a lot of skill, time and effort is put into them. But for the love of god, do not do close up shots on the characters’ faces
I read that sportswriter David Epstein cited biomechanical analysis of Jesse Owens racing and the conclusion was that with modern equipment, modern track/shoes etc., Owens would have been close to a 9.6X time.
Bs
more like 9.7/9.8
Epstein also found that with today’s starting blocks on today’s track in today’s shoes Owens would cross the finish line 1 step behind Bolt
Agree ... 10.2 on loose dirt with poor leather shoes and no starting block ya'll. This is so wrong on every level.
Do this simulation with Bob Hayes who also ran on cinder.
Bob Hayes would best/beat Bolt in such a scenario. Hayes was once timed in 8.6(eight point six) seconds for the one hundred yard dash. I'm speaking, about in 1964.( nineteen sixty-four.) NOBODY, IN MY OPINION, EVER RAN FASTER THAN BOB HAYES. PUT Bob, as a 22(twenty-two) year old, in 2010. That is when Usain was in his prime. Give them (Hayes, and BOLT) the same modernized shoes, starting blocks from that time, along with the advanced running track, about 4(four) months of training for the race, (100 meters) and a 1(one) mph(mile per hour) tailwind, if outdoors. It can be indoors, or outdoors, and watch how Bob would enjoy the victory, once it is over. It is noteworthy to say that when Bob won the 1964, 100 meters final on the track in the Tokyo Olympics, he was in the slow, first lane, and he had on someone else's shoes. Bob forgot his own shoes, and had to borrow those of a team member.
@@johnbarron2269 totally agree, especially with the assessment of what he was able to do in the 64 Olympics in a chewed up cinder lane that had not been reconditioned prior to his race. I'm not taking anything away from Bolt, but Hayes times are incredible on a slow track. His anchor leg on the 4x100 is legendary.
Exactly. Hayes ran 10.06 in Tokyo '64 on a cinder track in a badly chewed up lane 1. Lord alone knows what he would do if he was around in the modern era with todays tracks, training and nutrition.
@@johnbarron2269 Bolt would have crushed him. The olympic cinder tracks of the 60:s were very good compared to what Jesse Owens ran on. Right before the 1968 Olympics where they broke the 10 barrier on modern tracks they also ran on cinder tracks leading up to the competition. There was a 0.08 difference and that was on a lower altitude so almost no difference.
In addition to that the top speed for bolt is just so much ahead of Hayes that he couldn't have closed that up no matter what.
The fact is that no sprinter in modern times have even been less than 0.1 from bolt. He is just of another world.
These are two men who are all-time great in their time. Others have pointed out that that you can not compare them. I agree and go further.
The eras are so different that they may be measuring different qualities. It is very possible that if you put either one of them in the other's time that he would fizzle out and not be noticed at all. Not only do you have different running surfaces and shoes; you have different knowledge bases, different different diets, different access to facilities, different support structures. Those differences may be what made these men great and not some other men.
Let me say it this way. If you were to put not just Owens, but every person from Owens' time into Bolt's time and every person from Bolt's time into Owens' time, then it is very possible that neither man would be all-time great, but that 2 other men have the qualities to excel in these environments.
What software do you use to animate this?
Hello, I use several softwares ! Modelling, texturing, animating and rendering = Blender /Jersey Designs = Illustrator / Cloth Simulations = Marvelous Designer / Editing = Premiere Pro and After Effects
I love your videos ❤
Bro is getting better at this. Keep it up
It's very difficult to make comparisons between sportsmen/women of different eras due the conditions in which they performed. You can only compare athletes with others they competed against during their time.
The animations, the graphics and the sound😂
I had fun
Calculate the effect of different tracks, shoes, starting blocks and give Jesse Owens a handicap head start and then see who comes out on top. Not fair to compare otherwise.
what about allowing for diet, training, conditions?
The shoes back then alone would really slow someone down. Bolt also has a much bigger stride obviously. I feel like the athletes from the earlier eras worked as hard as they possibly could but just didn't have the science, nutrition, supplementation, training options that they do now.
RIP Jesse Owens
Do some women track stars too. Gail Devers , Flojo, etc.
Equalize for the track, spikes, starting block, etc, and the dream matchup would be Bolt vs Bob Hayes. It's likely a toss-up.
Impressive analysis. The over the shoulder view was frightening! I guess the variables that make the difference in speed are an interesting story on their own. Both are great athletes of their respective eras and, advances that increase performance mean present day sport scientists would take Owens, refine his technique, physique and strategies. He’d be running out of blocks, on an engineered surface, with better shoes. Even so, he still might not compete with Bolt sufficiently to share a podium. His actual greatness was even more significant in the context of The Olympic Games in 1930s Germany.
So tricky to compare generations with surfaces ,spikes ,diet and sports science/training.
Simply put they were both the best of their time
I would like to see them do this with Bob Hayes
People arguing on hypotheticals.
The truth: we will never know who would be the better athlete if they had the same training, nutrition, and equipment etc.
The reason people are saying Bolt would be faster and are unbending on that, is because they remember him and can't imagine anyone doing better.
While it does amaze how records in physical speed and strength sports continue to be broken, one has to wonder where the limit of human capacity actual is: what us the top running speed of a human, or swim speed?, what is the maximum weight a human body can lift? How many revolutions in the air can an ice skater physically complete?
So, this video is hypothetical and by no means gives a definitive answer if both had the exact same conditions.
One can only work it out by looking at height, weight and the biomechanics of their body to analyse which body has the mechanical capacity to run run faster given equal training conditions and equipment.
I like to see Bob Hayes in similar conditions against Bolt...on a cinder track!!
Jesse ran with Hitler in the stands. Real MVP!
It's extremely difficult to fairly compare them. If Bolt went back to the 1930s he would not run as fast on what they had then. Likewise Owens would run faster on today's tracks.
Someone will break the 9-second barrier, maybe in a hundred years.
can you make Usain Bolt vs Su Bingtian?
to be honest, Jesse Owens ran on a cinders, the ash from burnt wood. Usain Bolt ran on a fast modern surface.
they accounted for it
This is fantastic and entertaining graphics. Could this possibly be re-done to have Usain running on the grey cinders and 1930s spikes...with Jesse wearing the latest state-of-the-art footwear on the pristine blue track? In addition, maybe swap the training facilities, the nutrition, the specialist scientific and medical assistance...and the funding (relative to each era). I wonder how much closer it might be. About 4.2 metres seems to be the understood margin. Maybe this could be halved? I would also loved to have seen Jesse run 'in the flesh'...it must have been an amazing sight.
Jesse Owens was a natural talent not that Bolt isn't. Bolt is just as gifted and talented. Yet, we can't really make any comparisons as there is simply no basis of comparison.
Best of their time. It’s all you can be
This reminds me to the "ready to retire" scene from Cars 3
Please do fastest women ever vs fastest man. Thanks
Back when Jesse ran, they didn't have blocks. They had to kick spots to place their feet.
Owen's ran on a cinder track. Didn't have the modern training, reflexology and such.
Do videos of greyhound v cheetah 🐆
Usain bolt vs average person but with boost
I would love to see Bolt on dirt with no starting blocks. Owens would school him.
Anyone who believes this is a fair comparison is clueless or brain dead.
Owens ran on cinder tracks, not dirt. But I get your point. Betty Robinson would certainly have run faster on modern tracks also. She ran on cinder tracks like Owens.
ruclips.net/video/zGcC2kn4qgU/видео.html
@@AllinGold2 Cinder is dirt. It's hard dirt. When people refer to dirt tracks, they're talking about cinders.
I want to see Usain Bolt vs Bob Hayes, especially if Hayes ran on the same type of track, used the same shoes and had the modern training methods that Bolt has.
IMO the only way to compare athletes from different eras evaluate them based on how the each compare with their contemporary peers. A world record is a world record, and it will always be broken eventually. Bolt's WR will be broken by somebody in the future, but that doesn't automatically mean that the new WR-holder is better than Bolt.
these videos are sooo brilliant!!
10.2 on loose dirt with poor leather shoes and no starting block ya'll. This is so wrong on every level.
It was more like 10.4 if automatic timing. That's 0.8 seconds difference. No amount of better condition will make up for that. At best Owens would have run 10.0-10.1.
😂😂bolt never had a mustache 😂😂
i'd like to see that race with Jesse having modern equipment.
He wouldn't be even close to Bolts 9.58. Remember that the 10.2 was manual time. That's equal to 10.4. So this video comparison is false to begin with.
That 0.8 seconds difference is extreme.
@@Magnus_Loov yes he wouldn't be faster but i'm just curious how much faster Owens would have been with better shoes, track, etc..
Each the champion and fastest of the athletes competing in their era.
But there are too many differences between their circumstances and era's to make any direct comparison of how they'd compete against each other.
Can you do eye povs
Add in 'average man'.
Let's get some perspective of how fast these elite athletes are compared to a 'norma' person.
Invalid comparison since Owens 10.20 was manually timed. It would equal to about 10.40. That's a whopping 0.8 seconds difference to Bolts world record. An ocean of difference!
Great video, now do Cheetah Vs other fast animals and human in 400 Meters
And imagine this, jesse owens used to smoke and entire box of cigarettes a day
What 😮
He didn't start smoking until long after he had retired from athletics.
Completely different tracks, different shoes and different training. This comparison is unfair.
even if jesse had modern training and starts he would never be able to beat bolt thats just a fact people would need to accept although its true jesse would be closer to 10 seconds thana 10.3
People making excuses for Owens have me cracking up. Bolt would leave him in the dust.
It's the people who think that comparing Owens' 10.2 in the 1930's on a dirt track at a time when athletes were part time and practically zero was known about training and nutrition is somehow a level playing field with Bolt's 9.58 in the modern era that crack me up.
Dude you should do coleman vs prime usain bolt
That would be no contest
@@curtiss744well in the 60m prime coleman beats prime Usain maybe by 0.01 sec or so. He never said what distance lol
@@JimmyKim-fb1ji This is actually false. When Usain Bolt ran his 9.58 WR, his 60m split was 6.31~6.32 seconds, while Coleman's 60m indoor WR is 6.34 seconds. Now there is tailwind outdoors & I believe Coleman's 60m split during his 9.76 PB is also a 6.32. So prime vs prime it would be around a tie or Bolt would win by 0.01.
@@richardgallimore5976 yea but Coleman’s 6.34 indoors is most likely better than bolts 6.31 outdoors and Coleman has more experience running with the indoor tracks too but yea it would be a tie or someone barely winning
@@JimmyKim-fb1ji Using a wind calculator online it looks like it would be very close. A 6.31 with 0.9 m/s tailwind equates to a 6.34 with no wind, at least using the calculator I'm using. The races are run a bit differently though. In Bolt's 100m I believe his best split was either 60-70m or 70-80m so it was a more gradual acceleration. If his goal was the fastest time by 60 he would likely run it slightly differently to hit his top speed at 50-60m, so maybe he'd go better than 6.34.
In saying that Bolt had a LOT of confidence in his 100m & I think that let him run more relaxed from 60~100. If he were doing a 60m vs Coleman maybe he would tighten up in the last 10~20m as he'd for sure be behind at 40m & at 50m compared to Coleman. It'd come to to race execution on both sides.
NO FAIR!! I call foul. First, I'm a huge sprint fan and a former sprinter. My personal experience had me run on Cinder, just like Jesse; and all weather. All weather was just starting to be developed. I grew up near the Tire Capital of the world, Akron. They'd been looking for ways to use old rubber. Jesse Owens never ran 100 meters in his life. Right, do the conversion. Next, starting blocks. In Jesse's day they used a trowel, look it up. Shoes. forget about it! It wasn't until the mid 70's you had a decent sprinter spike. And finally, a young man coming from farm country, also from Ohio; who has never been treated as an equal. Thrust into a world in which he is carrying the expectations of a nation and running, pardon the pun; into the greatest Racist in history and he beat'em.
Usain is a once-on-a-lifetime gift. Proofed a big man could get out of the blocks and break records. When he applied himself, the best.
Both are great Champions and that's the only comparison needed. That's were it starts and ends. All is is pure folly.
I think if Jesse Owens ran today he would probably be closest to Asafa Powell due to his fast start
If Jesse had the training and the things we have with modern time, I’ll say he would run around a 9.6 or 9.7, but I’ll say his fastest time would be 9.55.
Owens with blocks and todays tech and track...would achieved somewhere between 9,92 and 9,98
I played track in the early 1970s and ran the 100, 220, and 440. If I ran that back then today it wood be shorter and faster take that in the consideration on it
I believe Jesse Owens would beat Bolt if he had the track and spikes like Bolt
I doubt that. He'd be faster than 10.2, but not close to 9.58. Jesse Owens was a good 20 years ahead of his time speed wise, Bolt is 50 years ahead of his time. WR of 9.58 came in 2009, it'll last until 2059. The second place runner in the 9.58 race ran a 9.71. In the last decade nobody has ran faster than Tyson Gay's 2nd place 9.71 in that race. The last World Champion (Noah Lyles) won with a 9.83 which was his new personal best. Bolt in comparison to the era he's in is likely the fastest of all time.
I think the closest to Bolt in comparison to era is Bob Hayes, Jim Hines, or Ben Johnson. I think those 3 would potentially be in the low 9.6s with today's stuff.
@@richardgallimore5976 I see what you saying but Owens didn’t have any blocks to start on he had to dig holes and had heavier cleats to run on and ran on dirt like I said if he had the same thing as Bolt he would be way faster and especially the training imagine if he had that I say he would be around 9.55 and he raced horses and beat them as well
@@NFLMullen24 It's impossible to tell completely accurately. My guess is that he'd be around 9.8, maybe 9.7s with today's technology.
@@richardgallimore5976 yea I still believe he would be faster then that he ran a 9.3 100 in 1935 if you don’t believe me look it up I believe Owens would be faster then Bolt
@@NFLMullen24 9.3 100 yards, 10.2 100 meters. Bolt's 9.58 second 100 meters calculated to 100 yards would be 8.76.
This is not a fair or accurate comparison. Andre Degrasse ran the 100m under Jessie Owen's conditions, he ran an 11.3s. His fastest legal time under current conditions, was 9.89s.
If Usain Bolt was the same height as the rest of the sprinters that he competed against, without such a distance-per-stride advantage, he would've been just an average sprinter.
Bro how do you get the graphics to be so sweet?
not even the same sport. JO and UB, Legends.
I’d like for you to do Usain Bolt VS Thierry Henry
I bet Jesse Owens was holding back in 1936.
Usain ran right through the line and out the stadium
Thanks for.the vid
With Modern Medicine and training plus Shoes/track surface Jesse Owens would be close to tied with Noah Lyles. Usain Bolt might be the fastest man of all time for much much longer.
MS Dhoni vs Bolt!!
You would have to make adjustments to the time periods in order to have a fair race between the two. IF you moved Owen to the future his speeds would definitely increase....If you moved Bolt to the past his speeds would definitely be slower....With time period adjustments...Bolt would probably still beat Owen's, but the margin would be a lot smaller.
cannot compare...shoes,track..training...nutrition...etc etc
You're all gonna ignore the fact that Jesse never took roids?
Bro Usain Bolt did not take roids, you can clearly see the muscle mass there’s no way someone with the genetics of Usain Bolt can’t build that muscle naturally. Also he stayed at top 1 for so long so why would he risk it to take anything.
Give Usain bolt the same shoes the same turf and the same training conditions of Jesse's and we'll se.
Let's give todays best 100m runners shoes and a track from the 80's and find out if they really are faster than Carl Lewis or if it is just the gear and much faster tracks that makes the difference
Owens is running a 9.7 if he were in his prime today
No he wouldn't. That would mean he would run 0.7 seonds faster. Remember that the time he ran, 10.20 was manually timed which equals to 10.40.
At best 10.0-10.1
@@Magnus_Loov Cmon man. Think about all the advancements in spikes and training, all the advancements in nutrition, and the fact that he wouldn't be running on a cinder track. And some manually timed races are actually pretty accurate. There's a chance he would run a 9.80
@@timmytheinventor4746 At the big races, like the Olympics, they averaged several stopwatches, so any deviation would get "evened out". The difference would be about 0.2 seconds (the reaction time after the starting gun).
Cinderella
Bolt destroyed this Owens guy
Heard to judge, though with modern training and equipment might have been closer