@@FormsInSpace Unlike you made a typo, and meant to say that *Alan Watts* focused on eastern philosophy (but he had a lot to say about Abrahamic doctrines as a former Anglican priest himself), I'm not sure how much you really know Alan Watts. As the *last disciple of Christmas Humphreys* , he was *for decades the foremost expert* on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Daoism *in the English-speaking world.* Only when Watts died did *Robert Thurman (Uma Thurman's father) surpass him.*
@ Buffy Breeden: As you probably well know, Watts did awesome and comprehensive explanations about Hindu thought : ruclips.net/video/MpbTODCAx9A/видео.html
Two minutes of actually doing something is equivalent to 2hours to 2 weeks of studying it as you can ONLY really learn by doing thus there's NO substitute as the reality of something is ALWAYS very different from the theory of it. Hence 99% of science DOESN'T describe reality as nothing occurs in a vacuum and only 5% of reality at all as 95% of the universe dark matter and energy or stuff we know absolutely nothing about. Thus we're making guesses off of the 5% that's known and only 5% of that 5% as we don't even understand most of the known universe.
Yest scientists have the conceit to believe they're right. Yet they're proven wrong over time EVERY time throughout history but nowadays the establishment of science has EVERY reason to NOT embrace change or even allow certain trains of thought. I say this while being a scientist myself, but the scientific method itself is highly problematic as your descibing such a tiny portion and then theorizing everything else as being exactly like what you think you saw as all data is good data just the conclusions are problematic.
That's not how science works. It's not a noun really it's an activity. One could be said to be "science user" or sciencing. It's just the application of the scientific method. It's not an object
Hinduism is correct it is self evident. Nevertheless, we must then accept that when a crime has been committed it is also part of the whole and yet should the criminal be punished?
To the extent that the Christian "Brahman" is God, then God is not transcendent, according to Hinduism, he is not in heaven. Instead, all that is immortal and unchanging is "inside" or beyond samsara and maya.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
"He who looks outside dreams, he who looks inside awakens."
Herr Jung
Yarl Cung? Good man
Could you please do a lecture on Alan Watts? Donte? Shamanism? Your great! I love listening to you.
@@FormsInSpace Unlike you made a typo, and meant to say that *Alan Watts* focused on eastern philosophy (but he had a lot to say about Abrahamic doctrines as a former Anglican priest himself), I'm not sure how much you really know Alan Watts. As the *last disciple of Christmas Humphreys* , he was *for decades the foremost expert* on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Daoism *in the English-speaking world.* Only when Watts died did *Robert Thurman (Uma Thurman's father) surpass him.*
@ Buffy Breeden: As you probably well know, Watts did awesome and comprehensive explanations about Hindu thought :
ruclips.net/video/MpbTODCAx9A/видео.html
I read the bahagavad gita as a teen, however it wasn't till I meditated on "I am brahmin" that I realized/felt this pantheism that it teaches.
Channel is underrated!
Thank you professor
Hinduism never made sense to me before until now.
Two minutes of actually doing something is equivalent to 2hours to 2 weeks of studying it as you can ONLY really learn by doing thus there's NO substitute as the reality of something is ALWAYS very different from the theory of it. Hence 99% of science DOESN'T describe reality as nothing occurs in a vacuum and only 5% of reality at all as 95% of the universe dark matter and energy or stuff we know absolutely nothing about. Thus we're making guesses off of the 5% that's known and only 5% of that 5% as we don't even understand most of the known universe.
Yest scientists have the conceit to believe they're right. Yet they're proven wrong over time EVERY time throughout history but nowadays the establishment of science has EVERY reason to NOT embrace change or even allow certain trains of thought. I say this while being a scientist myself, but the scientific method itself is highly problematic as your descibing such a tiny portion and then theorizing everything else as being exactly like what you think you saw as all data is good data just the conclusions are problematic.
That's not how science works. It's not a noun really it's an activity. One could be said to be "science user" or sciencing. It's just the application of the scientific method. It's not an object
Reason is only practicality but necessary...Life itself is not practical.
Hinduism is correct it is self evident. Nevertheless, we must then accept that when a crime has been committed it is also part of the whole and yet should the criminal be punished?
@jaden watson CORRECT!
When you say "Hinduism", do you mean the "Tat Tvam Asi" part, or like...worshipping Krishna/Shiva/etc.?
@@JSmusiqalthinka no worshipping!
Yes bcuz the physical is simply more real that the metaphysical.
The universe is in the Self. I had that thought before seeing the description.
To the extent that the Christian "Brahman" is God, then God is not transcendent, according to Hinduism, he is not in heaven. Instead, all that is immortal and unchanging is "inside" or beyond samsara and maya.
1st