great Matthew, did the change (of the display name) on the managed solution, create an unmanaged layer on top of the managed layer in that environment?
Hi, in the summary you said, if allowed users could go into default solution, do the changes they want and it will reflect in the managed solution. By my experience this is not correct. The managed layer will remain as it is, but any change in the target system - either in default solution or any custom solution - will create a new unmanged or "active" layer to the corresponding object. Have not tested it again, but is the behavior still like this or did MS change the approach in here?
![Wiz Khalifa - Khalifa's Home [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnrLCTe0Nz4/mqdefault.jpg)
![VICTOR Denmark Open 2024 | An Se Young (KOR) [1] vs. Gregoria Mariska Tunjung (INA) [5] | SF](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y3QEyCih85s/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you! Very helpful and informative.
This saved me. Thanks for the learning experience.
That option was tough to find, thanks for sharing.
Thank you so much!😉
Very informative video. Thanks for sharing
great Matthew, did the change (of the display name) on the managed solution, create an unmanaged layer on top of the managed layer in that environment?
Just awesome, thanks a lot!
Hi, in the summary you said, if allowed users could go into default solution, do the changes they want and it will reflect in the managed solution.
By my experience this is not correct. The managed layer will remain as it is, but any change in the target system - either in default solution or any custom solution - will create a new unmanged or "active" layer to the corresponding object.
Have not tested it again, but is the behavior still like this or did MS change the approach in here?
Is there a such thing as an environment being managed in addition to the solution being managed?