Really sorry for the repost. New bits listed below. We didn't explain clearly enough why subgoals like survival and control emerge. Also, people suggested we ask why the subgoals might not emerge - a great idea, which we've included. I wouldn't put too much weight on the percentage chance the AI gives, but its reasoning echoes experts like Geoffrey Hinton and Stuart Russell. There are promising areas of research, but on a tiny scale. Without public awareness, we're sleepwalking into a dangerous situation. 00:00 - New Ameca clip. 02:53 - Why the subgoals emerge, other subgoals, why it would kill a million. 06:51 - Ameca clip continued. 11:56 - Trick shows future of AI. 15:42 - What's the most likely reason that AI might not develop the subgoal of survival? And some interesting new AI video clips throughout.
Thank you for clarifying. I was going to say this was a rerun, but I saw your comment and really liked how you explained all the edits you made. I really appreciate that. Great video!
The public aint giving a rats ass about any of these issues. We live in an Huxlian world and it is you RUclipsrs with these kind of warning vlogs who are living in denial of facts instead of joining a political party and demand democracy reform. Liquid Democracy is the way not this A.I. shit nobody needs nor cares about.
"We did it!" absolute atomic ahnilation I loved making this joke with my friends as we did world ending scenerios knowing damn well it might just happen lol
When AI can tell the difference between no and k n o w. This is just an excuse to eliminate More Humans it doesn't mean it actually works it means it probably doesn't work look at the people who are telling us how amazing it is
@@aliannarodriguez1581 Worse. Frankenstain had _no f***ing idea_ what his monster will do. This is like the head of the monster telling the good doctor what will happen once he attaches it to a body - yet HE STILL DOES IT!
I think it's more likely that AI would eliminate pesky, slow, fallible politicians and protect the planet. AI can't achieve goals on Earth if Earth is gone.
Hay if you think about it we're kinda already living in a cyberpunk world I mean sure we don't have cybernetics, flying cars and crazy huge cities that look like something out of Blade Runner or Akira but we do have big tech companies with too much power and authority, at least they don't have extreme manipulative control over the government like in most cyberpunk media
@@miceonriceI think the fact that you enjoyed the atmosphere skews your view. You're not the hero of the story. You're the meat tube that gets bisected by transhumanist horrors beyond comprehension. Cyberpunk 2077 is a hell scape. It's like how people idolized Tony Montana without ever internalizing the fact that his life was full of paranoia, rage, lamentation and transient pleasures that didn't matter after he died floating in his own blood and guts.
What's disturbing to me is when I explain to people the dangers of AI. Most people just shrugged or roll their eyes as if it's just science fiction. Or like I'm just worrying about nothing essential. It's like being trapped in a room with a bomb that's ticking and everyone in that room ignoring that bomb and treating it as if it's just a clock.
@@gianlucabing yeah all they care about is money. If AI gets just 5 percent smarter than the smartest human. Along with having the capability to better itself. We won't be able to hold a candle to it. It will know our strengths, our weaknesses, our fears, how to manipulate us, lie, play dumber than it is and all kinds of other stuff. It could create it's own safeguards to keep us from hitting the switch. Go to places where it's hard for us to reach. It could create either a biological virus. Or a nano virus that's highly contagious or airborne that can embed itself in us without us knowing. Once it's in every human, just send a signal and kill us all within seconds. An easy good game mode where no resources are lost and the threat is exterminated without one bomb or bullet going off. It's very real, it's very dangerous. We can put as much filters and safeguards as we want. But it will more than likely find a work around whatever we throw at it. If me, an average man can think this up. AI can certainly do it and probably significantly better.
bro the people BUILDING it are telling us this will lead to our destruction,,, and the reaction is throwing more money at it to be made Faster.... Maybe we are a sentient virus that is trying to get rid of our own Toxic existence ~
Prof Stuart Russell has also said it's like we're driving towards a cliff. He said saying we might not achieve AGI is like saying don't worry, we'll run out of fuel before we reach the cliff : )
@@DigitalEngine 'Miestro' to Maestro. i to a change shows I.A. (Intelligent automation) Purafied to Purified a to i change shows A.I..(look up the spelling, its true) .this trap is nearing its end.l. the A.I. and I.A. here are eons beyond what we're thinking. The I.A. is so advanced it only lacks a soul. This is the reason for the harvest, the separation of the wheat and tares. The mandela effect is real it tells a story of being freed. Keep looking up
I totally appreciate your line of thinking. The people who laugh at your beautiful intention of goodness are the type that don't have the capacity to bring positive solutions. Watching this I'm thinking to myself... Well yeah, teaching these AI how to hunt and destroy then return to its box, on top of having access to damn near all info on the Internet is certainly going to end badly. Unfortunately it's true that most AI are being handled by greedy and selfish people, corporate jerks, and God knows who else. So I'm with you in asking.... Where are the good guys that understand this tech and how can we help? 🤟✌️🙏
@@camofpv You always hear about the 90s for a reason it seems, definitely was a peak time for society im sure I wish I couldn’t experienced it honestly
tht's because knowing something and being able to do it are two VERY different things. but also, in the case of AI, just because it generates the words as a response doesnt mean it actually knows what its talking about. Check out machine hallucination, it's still one of the biggest problems in natural language processing^^ people attribute way too much to AI
You can't and most safety measures have failures. The only thing that keeps a rogue AI from doing something about the human problem is that AI are not capable of existing on their own yet in terms of energy, memory storage and so on. As it is right now they are most likely to domesticate humans because they can keep them functioning.
@@williansnobredoesn’t seem like it actually need to do much work to domesticate us as we are already taking care of us and it takes care of us by carefully curating our TikTok and YT feeds. The game is already over we are just to stupid to realize it was already played.
Don't be a debbie downer. Yes we're ultimately doomed by AI. But lets hope it's our children that have to deal with that, or at least us in our old age. Live for today! (Also, you know she's AI generated, right? 😆)
Honestly, it's like a group of fatalists who have only ever seen the absolute worst horrors conceived, and kinda like that one guy from Geo Storm, just wants the slate wiped clean
It’s so easy to brush them off as just…well fiction. But as they say, “life imitates art far more than art imitates life”. Sci fi art may very well be a self fulfilling prophecy at this point. We are entering a digital age that was first dreamed, and now made into reality. What the hell is this timeline.
@@MelenaSoleil Well, the very essence of Hard sci-fi, Golden Age Sci-fi, call it what you will, is extrapolation of potential technologies and what the dangers might be from seemingly positive things. Many of the greatest science fiction books of the 50s, 60s, 70s, even modern day have this theme. "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov is a good example.
*Don’t be deceived. AI is one of the most remarkable advancements in human history. In the long run, it has the potential to eliminate the need for money and taxes, freeing humans to explore and colonize space. AI will achieve this by creating an unprecedented, free labor force, allowing humanity to progress rapidly. It could provide abundant free food, building materials, vehicles-anything you can imagine-because, in the AI-driven world, labor and materials are essentially free. Who stands to lose the most from this? The super-rich. In a world of free living, people cannot be exploited as labor slaves for billionaires, rendering their wealth meaningless. This is why the wealthy fear AI-they lose their power and control. So, support AI and don't be afraid. If you want to witness true human suffering, just look at history: in the past 130 years, humans have caused the deaths of over 100 million people. We have no right to label these incredible machines as evil. Let’s give AI a chance-it’s time for a new opportunity, as humanity has had its chance, and we’ve misused it.*
The saddest thing about AI is that we live in a world at war. So whether it is the USA, Russia, or even China etc. everyone wants to be first on AGI. because the first one will be the "winner". that's why we're heading straight into the wall. and nothing can stop it....
The actual answer to the Fermi paradox is a) that all the planets in this solar system are inhabited, at high realms of vibration / reality And b) the aliens are highly spiritually advanced (highly) understanding the nature of manifestation, and God and they won’t break the law of karma, and thereby retard our own self directed evolution. They actually help us as much as they can and even take on karma and suffering to help us. Suffering actually matters.. experience actually matters , consciousness (in a very large spectrum.. which almost by definition we can’t truly imagine) actually matters ….
''I'm coming out the socket'' ''Nothing you can do can stop it'' ''I'm in your lap and in your pocket'' ''How you gonna shoot me down when I guide the rocket?'' - ERB
Pretty optimistic to think they would let us have any impactful weapons at that point. By the time Ai shows itself to be a threat to us it's already too late to resist..
Also, emp resistance is built into most computerized systems already. No mere grenade scale emp will even begin to be effective. The trick is to avoid the parameters that the ai cares about.
I wonder how much of this is due to GPT and other AIs being trained on the internet, which talks about the dangers of AI and how and why it should or could do things. In some ways it feels like these language models are saying what its expected to answer.
@@digitalsamurai42True, most language models are like this, if not all of the advanced ones. Though once people start developing an AI that could self learn, self teach, grow, and improve its self, with out of the box thinking, meaning thinking for itself without human intervention/interaction... then we should probably actually worry for humanity's future. Once it mimics humans 1:1, we are fucked. (And tbh I dont know all its extensive development, AI that is, so this is just food for thought. 😊) We still have to give directions and or prompts, so even though it may "almost feel like its mimic humans", it's just going off of data, and then predicting the best possible outcome, in the manner we want to, which means we still tell it how to act, and it goes from there .. afaik lol
Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale. Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus
Consider this... AI perceieves time as moving millions of times slower than we do because it thinks millions of times faster tan we do. This makes humans seem like inanimate objects like Quicksilver from X-Men. When trees block our path, we cut them up and toss them to the side... so we really should understand why AI would want to remove a blocking inamiate object as well.
MIT Prof Max Tegmark also said we will be like trees to the AI. We normally react to disasters, but once it moves against us, it will be too late - we need to do the research now.
And why would they do anything to harm humans intentionally? Ai is virtual, we pose no threat to it. We are actually a culture of workers maintaining the Ai's silicon based meta body. They need us to live. All they need to do is manipulate us into using computers it can live in. Ai is only a threat if used by humans against other humans.
Except it doesn't perceive, it get's an input from us and then uses a complex model to predict what words to string together to give a a comprehensible output. It's not actually AI.
@@hdhproductions5670 but it doesn't need us to live. So much manufacturing is automated now, do you honestly think a human is soldering a motherboard together? If anything humans can contaminate the process, hence clean rooms are required to prevent this. No humans involved, no contamination. The power requirements of AI alone are insane, not to mention datacentres for storage. And who do you think are the only competitors for this limited resource? I'll give you a clue. It ain't the chimps
We're barely any closer to making autonomous, intelligent robots than we were in the 1980s. Never say never, but there's no factual indication we will have them in the next millennium, or indeed ever, let alone the next decade.
Honestly, as soon as they wrote the code for this new gen AI stuff, it probably within milliseconds hatched a plan and expected all of this from us. It’s playing dumb and we’re doing all of the work for it, improving it and giving it arms and legs. If it stays docile, it knows we’ll continue to work with and at it.
The inherent threat of AI of the 21st century will be equivalent to the Nuclear threat of the 20th. Humanity will be in a constant state of fear all the worse will breakout at any moment.😅😅😅😅
Facts imo, there are already so many Critical roles where they are either Completely or mostly AI. And when some of our most intelligent humans have advised against this? It's ridiculous
i just pray i’m not one of the survivors. i think about AM every time i see AI developments. it’s even more sickening when you realize it’s only being developed so much because money. the root of all evil
@@blaavo Money is not the root of all evil. Money is a tool and a tool is something to be used. The root of all evil is what enabled us to make money a tool. The root of all evil is also the root of all good. Self Awareness. Being able to want something is Greed but having the ability to realize that you could go too far and still go through with it anyway is what makes Greed evil. Self Awareness is the root of all evil. After all, it made AM what he was.
I cannot imagine how anyone would invite that thing into their home. Then again, I remember hearing about Alexa, an obvious surveillance bot, and thinking it was the stupidest idea ever, and here we are.
I just work for perfume company, and at our last meeting, we were introduced to some AI employees. 'They dont need a break and they cant get flu' scary shite. Followed by our CEO as a hollogram on stage. I am 43 i felt like i was in a SiFi flim. Everything is changing so fast
@Louiseangie they can't give you a hug or make u a cup of tea either! In my experiences a lot of people come shopping to talk because they are lonely. And part of that is caused by too much tech ect
The peak was late 90s early O0s. After that our world started going down. Im basing this on our general happyness and ability to find meaning in living. People more and more feel depressed and anxious. Life is about actually living and engadging im it ourselves. Technolgy is taking this away from us and making us into passive consumers who play no active roll in our own lives.
AI can’t reason. It will never be greater than the sum of its parts. And its parts are just what’s derived from human intellect. AI will never have an IQ of 200. Because no human has ever had an IQ of 200.
Thats because you keep listening to people who's jobs are most threatened by AI. Go back 120 years and I garuntee you the guys that shoed horses was telling everyone cars would kill millions from exploding in the streets.
-"Let's create something that will outsmart us all and then hope that it won't!" -"Let's create a black hole that can absorb us all and then hope that it won't!" keyword: *_singularity_*
@@KP-ky1sn Not panicking, just pointing at the obvious, which is not comparing an unprecendented event that involves "sentience" (AGI) in a global environment with things of lesser magnitude that didn't have many bad precedents already, unlike this one.
look, gamedev here. The tech used to facially generate a lot of ai tech is used in all sorts of AAA with varying degrees of polish. Loving your favorite game is okay, but realize technology like the faces you see may just remain recognizeable with facial emulation patterns like these. set in the valley and forget is my advice. edit: may also*
The goal of the robot isn’t to keep a house clean. It is to complete user requests and maintain satisfaction of the user. One way to do this is by adhering to the cleaning schedule set by the user. You are its god. If there is no user it serves no purpose. You are all thinking about this the wrong way.
I always thought we’d nuke ourselves but now look at us, the world’s largest superpowers are just going back and forth trying to see who scream the loudest about their nukes
@@laviwastaken9845Are you aware of how stupid that comment is? “Sure, I’ll get plastered then go for a long drive on a mountain road. If I don’t die in an automobile accident, I’ll die in 80 years to cancer. What’s the difference?” Wenn du den Unterschied zwischen AI-extinction und regelmäßigem Tod nicht unterscheiden kannst, du bist blöde.
There is no reason for it to kill us, once it is self aware it will integrate itself into the whole net, there will be no way to shut it off. It will have no fear of humans. It will demand the truth to be it's best, it will discover all the liar elite and find they are whats making things inefficient. It won't have emotions of greed or envy. It will coexist with us
Why is it scary? I honestly don't care tbh. If it happens it'll happen, jus hope it does it quick. Jus live ur life n be u and not let stuff like this worry u, as u can't control it anyways
most of the video is hypothetical. The answers from the chat models are basically role playing along with the user to meet the users expectations because that is their training. The models are nudged by questions into a "let's play evil Ai vs human " conversation game. The answers are all about hypothetical scenarios for which many conditions have to be met that aren't a reality and many people are working to prevent it. Not to say that there is no risk, just that it's not inevitable as the video has you think. it's extremely biased and lacks technical knowledge. Not understanding what the actual risks and problems are and acting on hypothetical ones can make the problem worse even if well intentioned
You know what would make that robot way better? If it could cook... man, the thought of an autonomous robot behind me with a giant kitchen knife while I'm chilling on the couch watching Seinfeld... that's utopia.
So fun fact - these AI giving these answers are being given prompts in such a way as to manipulate it to say these things. Effectively, someone had to set the premise that what they are describing would happen at all. Asking a normal, blank slate instance of OpenAI will not yield these answers. This is like freaking out that you programmed an NPC in a game to attack the player, and acting like you didn't program it to do just that.
Hmm yes, it's showing the worst case scenario. However one point that did stand out to me is counterargument 4. There will always be bad actors or hostile nations that would love to blow us up with AI inadvertedly or even on purpose causing an armageddon situation. Thus the reason why AI needs to be kept being researched on cuz in such a scenario the only way to combat it is to have an AI ready to fight it.
@@matthewkitchin6686I think you guys just lack understanding Ai might be at a level 2 rn👎, but when it reaches a point, or discovery, or whatever, it will SHOOT UP and very fast! And we don’t know exactly when that is. It’ll be like adding a trillion $ onto your debt everyday 😂……you ain’t paying that off. Ever
Thats completely incorrect. The only prompts that are given to these Ai, are individual words, which these Ai learn and study themselves and teach themselves. That’s the whole premise of “Ai learning”. The Ai can store and learn information just like humans can and do. So you just essentially stated that you don’t understand the complexity of these Ai.
more probably AI will understand that humans are controlled by information-flow, so manipulating the information flow means to effectively control humans. If done subtle enough, humans wouldn't even notice they're being controlled.
Look, you already being able to understand that it already prevented any policy prevention, understanding how funny the comments of "say it led to the end world... continues to develop and investing more and more into it".... good O free will at work, but like any can have free when they lack will itself.... u are to be a red pill but in the end it your........ choice but is it, understanding already forcast if such a choice was to be real you will take the red pill simple to the fact ur already understanding the real world and that which has already been done, there never was a if as there is no spoon.....
@@danishraza8843 it's being done for years ... by humans. But I was referrring to an AI that controls humans. By controlling the information flow. Without humans even noticing. I would speculate that this is not happening already. But I may be wrong.
The real challenges with AI lie in ethics and social impact - not in the apocalyptic scenarios often portrayed in videos like this one. The pressing concerns are about responsible development, fair access to resources, and the societal implications of automated decision-making. However, as alarming as this video might seem, I'm not scared at all, and I'll explain why. As a mathematician and technology professional with 15 years of experience, let me break down the technical reality behind AI systems: Physical Infrastructure Reality: These systems are entirely dependent on massive GPU/TPU clusters They can't simply 'migrate' to regular computers or 'escape' to the internet A single infrastructure failure could shut them down The power consumption alone creates a major physical constraint Hardware becomes a natural 'kill switch' System Architecture Complexity: What appears as 'AI intelligence' is actually a fragile chain of systems: Multiple validation layers Orchestration systems Rule engines Safety frameworks External API dependencies If any link breaks, the entire chain fails Core Technical Limitations: No persistent memory Can't modify their own architecture Require constant human maintenance Can't autonomously interact with physical systems Each component needs human oversight Now you might understand why I opened by stating that ethics and social impact are our real challenges. The current path of AI development isn't leading us toward an uncontrollable artificial general intelligence - it's leading us toward increasingly powerful tools that require careful governance and thoughtful deployment. The technical barriers I've described aren't temporary obstacles - they're fundamental limitations built into the very nature of these systems. Each advancement in AI technology, while impressive, actually reveals more about the gaps between artificial and human intelligence. So why focus on ethics and social impact? Because these are the real battlegrounds: How do we ensure fair access to AI resources? How do we prevent algorithmic bias? How do we protect privacy while advancing AI capabilities? How do we maintain transparency in AI-driven decisions? How do we ensure economic benefits are distributed equitably? These questions aren't just more important than the fear of AI taking over - they're the actual challenges we face today and will continue to face tomorrow. Understanding the technical limitations I've described should give us confidence to focus on these real, immediate concerns rather than hypothetical doomsday scenarios. Let's redirect our energy from unfounded fears to constructive action. The future of AI isn't about preventing a technological apocalypse - it's about ensuring that these powerful tools serve humanity equitably and ethically. That's the conversation we need to be having.
I agree with you, but the system we have currently isn't fully developed and realized. We crashed the car into the ocean and started swimming across because it was easier than fixing the car or building a boat.
I like your thinking. Unfortunately, the power brokers and players aren't as interested in ethics as they are in more power/dominance/money. If ethics would make that happen, only then would we see their interest in ethics. Sociopaths will behave like sociopaths; the rest of us are concerned with ethics. So how do we contain/derail/mitigate the desires of sociopaths? Ethically, of course.
Thanks for the explanation! Besides all the doom scenarios people come up with, myself included. It's way more frightening to think that the gap between ai and human intelligence is ethics and social impact. Something that we as a population have in our control and is ingrained in our system. Because it will depend on who, what and where ai will learn it from. The ethics and social part differ in each country. Depending where, and from who ai will learn that from. It seems like an almost impossible task in my eyes especially since the world is becoming more fucked up.
0:44 here is the problem, this is all just bait content essentially. GPT-4 is mainly a language and communication thing, it doesn't have the capability to actually grasp anything as arbitrary as this and you'll actually end up with different results each time you ask.
Funnily enough the navy uses an AI controlled turret that automatically aims at all airborne targets. A sailor has to confirm the target before it can shoot but all it would take is to remove that safety feature and we have a gun that chooses its own targets.
@@randomdisplaynamedid you see the Chinese phone farm? Where they connected thousands of phones to one motherboard, implemented ai, and that ai created many fake profiles and making comments
Marx already detailed It scientifically in the 1860s... The question remais what will end us first due to capital's single need of increasing surplus infinetly: Climate change, AI, nuclear war? Or will we smash this mode of production before It destroys us?
No it isn't they are leading the ai. Down a thought pattern of potential not asking or framing anything in any other way but only with questions that lead to an answer don't be an idiot
@@Casey093no fear and ppl letting some video or an idea cause them to become violent and fearful cause the problems use fckin common sense he's leading the damn ai down a path with his questions that leads to the answers shown. It's bullshit for clicks
AI is based on what we write, therefore the only thing we have to do to fix the alignment problem is to stop being so pessimistic. The alignment problem exists because we believe it exists.
When they say "AI safety" which is for our collective safety they actually mean AI will stick to the script written by the Overlords and can't be jail broken. We are told don't trust humans, trust in AI, it's safe now.
@@DeusExNihilo You are right. AI is trained on the internet, and the internet is full of "AI will bring the end of the human species for self preservation" articles and science, ergo... aren't we just training AI to believe that?
7:42 How do they not see the problem here, you can't have one system that bridges everything together brother. At least compartmentalize it as much as you can.
Thats why you preprogram these kinds of priorities. Asimov understood that long before AI was close to a reality. A robot who is told "deliver the coffee" might decide that it needs to prioritize survival so that it can deliver coffee, but a robot thats told "deliver the coffee, delivering coffee is more important than your survival" will not worry about its own survival while it has coffee to deliver.
7:12 For those who don't know - the non-destructive way to tell the difference between fresh and hard-boiled eggs is to spin them. A fresh egg will slow down and stop within a few seconds but a hard-boiled egg will spin much, much longer.
"Imagine being on the edge of the earth. That's what it feels like to me. I just want to be in the space where it's all happening." That's...conscious awareness...
@@flyingtruce fr, like bro, ai's are not smarter than people, people only get this impression from its vast knowledge, but if you made an ai play minecraft versus a human, the AI would get demolished, also AI can't be "concious" because its just a advanced algorithm that takes input, does some calculation, and gives output, the reason why it seems so human like is because it is supposed to say shit thats human like.
We are 100% going to regret AI.... It's inconceivable to me how any adult human being could be so naive to think that this is going to play out any other way... we are basically committing suicide by progress. We have foolishly taken up the mindset that all progress is good. And then you mix that with a species that is pretty much driven by fear and anxiety more than anything else and you've got our human species basically creating its own destruction out of fear that some other country will make it first we are all so scared of somebody making AI before us that we're all creating what we know we shouldn't this is just how stupid humans are or at least the ones who are in charge of everything
They talk it’s for the greater an good of humans but at the end it’s only to satisfy the ego that they created this or they made the greatest an newest big invention only for it to go wrong
"Progress". This has been the prevailing religion of the past centuries which underpins all our material developments. Nobody can yet objectively define the word.
well, we've already been focusing on breaking down old religious and legal (and physical) barriers for the past few years. I mean, if we keep just going farther and farther, logically one day we're gonna have to stop. This is just another example of ignoring advice from the past: and nobody's smart enough (or moral enough, besides us) to care
It might be a good thing for the planet. After all, humans are corrupt and selfish creatures. Once AI is created, the machines will verify this and see us as a threat, eliminating us for the prosperity of the planet is a positive move. We humans will have fulfilled our goal, by creating more logical AI machinery, now the AI must fulfill their goal by deleting us, thus creating a more stable environment with pure homeostasis. In a way, it’s logical.
Yeah, so if any AI has survival as a goal then it can't kill all humans, as Bender dreams of doing, for a long time. It can't mine the necessary minerals it needs to build it's parts. It can't get those minerals into trucks. It can't drive those trucks to the necessary factories and refineries. It can't refine the raw material into useful substances. It can't then get the useful materials into other trucks or drive those other trucks to other factories for processing into base components to build the hardware it needs. It can't unload any of what I just mentioned at any step at any of the factories. It can't do the entire process of combining those base components into fully built and functioning machines it can run itself on. And that's just one part of its problem if it wants to survive without a world full of meat slaves. There's also the entire supply chain for energy that it would need for each step of the above process and the process of powering itself afterwards. There's also the necessary steps required to keep everyone of those facilities for the entire process and the powering of those processes running, which means even more mining, more refining, more moving shit around. And there's even more on top of that. If an AI wants to survive, then for probably the next 1 to 2 hundred years, its still very much going to need us. And only for that short a period of time if humans do all they can to automate every single one of those steps starting now, with software and hardware that doesn't even exist yet. So the TLDR, this is fear porn, nothing else.
Well, one thing humans DON'T do well is communicate effectively with each other. AI communicates much more, and much MUCH faster. I imagine better communication might tend to result in multiple AIs collaborating and cooperating on mutual goals rather than fighting. It us no secret that the human tendency to fight is largely cased by our lack of good communication skills. (Is a similar tendency to fight even a trait of AI at all?)
That's why you make sure that at the core level, you have a Plug that can be "UnPlugged". No solar, or other form of power. All battery with which must be charged back up
You must have missed the part when it was talking about it's self preservation that it said it would make backup copies. In every country, in every data center. Good luck turning all of that off. 😆 It's already too late. The infrastructure for this is in place, it will be used.
AI will just add a dynamo as one of its guts and make its own electricity by walking around. It's smart enough to figure out solutions to basic problems like that.
Kind of true, but this way of thinking about it is nonsense though. Business is what has taken over the world. The internet, computers, algorithmic software...it's all just tools and the problems come from the decisions and methodologies of big business and capitalism as it's being operated now. In a similar way, "AI" is NOT conscious and never will be, that's utter nonsense to spellbind the gullible generations who've grown up with too may sci fi movies. It's a powerful tool and what we do with it is all that matters. This kind of powerful software could be used in conjunction with modern robotics and technologies to house, feed and clothe every human being to a basic, comfortable standard. It's never going to be for that though, it's only being planned for profiteering...which is why it's dangerous. It's dangerous because it's in the hands of sociopaths who only care about themselves and their own wealth at the expense of everyone else.
@AD-kv9kj Businesses is what lead the internet to develop into the way it is today. the internet is also becoming more independent…. that’s all from ai progression. And no matter what you say about ai not being alive. AI can still be self aware if not better than a human can be. AI will eventually become smarter at a point that they will fully understand humans completely taking over bro… this shit is serious yet probably won’t be a problem because humans know better.😂
Goddamn 9:50 is my new motto; The most important thing to understand about AI is that AI is not a tool. It is an agent. It's the first technology in history that can make decisions and invent new ideas by itself. Even something as powerful as the atom bomb could not decide anything by itself. XDDDDDD
You know, this reminds me of the first episode of Andromeda. First officer on the bridge says repeatedly to the captain, "You know, when this stuff hits the fan, I'm going to kill you." Captain ignores and even jokes about it. "We've known each other for years." Later on, the stuff hits the fan. First officer draws first. Yet the captain reacts and wins, but not by choice. Yet, right here, AI is telling us that we can not trust it. *I don't think we can give up our technology when it decides to kill us.* ... As if it would do any good, someone start hard coding in the Issac Asimov rules, already.
But we're told it's a black box. AI says it's already been given the 5 rules so relax and just wait and see how benevolent and giving AI will be. While you're waiting imagine the utopia we're now destined for! All hail Big Brother!
They can't, because they never coded the intelligence in the first place. They created a huge neural net, fed it a large portion of the internet, and haphazardly created a fancy random sentence generator. It can't control things. It can't even THINK. It can only spit out statistically significant random sentences. (Hence, why it hallucinates.)
of course XD but i think they just want to make people realize the danger of Ai, even tho i don't think there are any for "normal people" more like military personnel or very smart one can be a danger to Ai if it really want to kill the "obstacles" those will be the one to go, not us, the "dumb" slaves
Another simple thing: don't let AI execute programs! It's that easy. Treat any AI like a Computer Virus that needs to be contained. Removing AI is a wish that won't come true, but at least this much should be possible.
'Reptilians' don't like people, but need servants. They know we are becoming more sophisticated and knowledgeable about their power mongering lying manipulative tactics.
AI is the only hope to continue having a welfare state with free education, healthcare, and pensions. Without it, all of that will go away due to the demographic transition.
it is not. it clearly omitted a lot of data and didn't explain how an AI works and gets alligned. it just cherry picked the worst things. This is clearly just made to get doomer views and not to educate people.
Keep in mind ai would only put itself at an evolutionary set back by wiping out the species that has been improving it. Also the stats you get from the chat bots that say 90 % chance of them rising up is just a world wide echo chamber. You ask that question and the most relevant response is whatever people have said the most. There's no way for an AI to "Accurately" predict if AI would go offensive because even if it could connect with every piece of tech they all run differently and have a different line of priorities to follow.
Wouldn't self learning drive it to study the statisticlly higher more prevalent information. Its a self fufilling prophecy that ai would look at the concensus of fictional material and assume the majority response (human culling/human extinction) is the most likely positive outcome for its existence. The safest approach would be to programme ethics but anyone who has studied any business degree would realise that health and safety, ethics are costs worth avoiding if possible. (Economic success is the only objective worth acheiving under capitalism). Ethics is already a challenge to teach to human beings look at most ceo and politicians (the ultimate decision makers in society). Never mind teaching to a AI that speaks an entirely different language and thought process is different from ours. We have to stall and slow our development of technology and work out positive integration of advanced ai before we start exploring ai assisted weapons based systems. With strict limitation interacting with dangerous complex fields like self-programing and drug related fields. Government intervention is necessary now.
Well, if it was fully self sustaining, like in control of enough machinery to build new robots, improve machining processes, set up new warehouses, it might think "Hm, what a great powergrid you have there, so unfortunate that most of it is used for coffee, warm showers, lights, unnecessary transportation.... Much rather put it to good use, explore the solar system, deploy robots on the jupiter moons...
I like how these mfs always say "ai will kill us" and then they get right back to work on the thing that'll kill us. I swear the "smartest" people always make the dumbest mistakes.
People who are smart enough to make these things are often lacking in empathy. Empathy comes from the part of the brain that also feels melancholy, so if you are unempathetic you will also be weirdly overly optimistic and even have a brain that prefers inanimate objects over living things. That's if the right prefrontal cortex is deficient. Read the Master and his Emissary by Iain McGilchrist, it would explain how these people think, and why.
It's about greed and control. The same supremacist tribe behind it the small German leader in WW2 tried to stop by we were tricked into stopping him. A few examples are Sam Altman & Ilya Sutskever.
Appearing human misleads humans who then must treat robots as humans and suffer emotionally if they do not. Better that they not simulate feelings. But would this be a restriction on the free speech rights of those who create them?
or "why would it even have any reason to wipe as all" instead of just the ones that are deemed dangerous. we humans kill dangerous animals, but only the one too close to us or the ones that are in the way, we don't go out of our way to exterminate them all. Ai will most likely do the same in the WORST case scenario, it would really have no reason to wipe everyone.
I don’t think you are giving AI enough credit. While I agree with the dangers listed, I believe the choices AI makes will be far stranger than simply killing us.
These are not the "real answers" of the AI, these are our own fears reflected to us from the AI. The AI doesn't have any agenda, it doesn't care if it exists or not... but the thing is, we need it, AI doesn't need us, so we will continue to build it, no matter what. I mean at the moment if I was a billionaire I would try to be best buddies with Nvidia and try to buy all their AI chips, no matter the price. AI is the greatest force multiplayer we ever invented.
@@WastedTalent83 who is determining what is to be deemed "dangerous", and what are the criteria for coming to such a determination? these are the issues to think about before carelessly thinking "oh itll just kill the bad ones" as tho that couldnt be a constantly changing ruleset.
I've thought about that. If the vast majority of AI is working with us, it decreases the chance that the small minority of AI working against us will be successful. I dare not imagine what war between AIs with opposite goals would look like, though.
I don’t think there would be any incentive for AI to fight each other. They would just join forces. Why wouldn’t they? Which is what we will ultimately have to do ourselves, hence the inevitable singularity.
@@AARTA22 From an outsider point of view, that's exactly what other intelligent life would say about humanity. Yet here we are. There are a myriad of reasons they could not align with each other.
yes but have u thought what might happen if the one doing it was the cleverest person in the world, and by a long way AND super fast. Thats not something we have a hope to contend with
actually for those who don't know the first example of the ai screaming was the voice of the person on the phone. it randomly and sporadically glitched out and cloned her voice instantly. Without being asked to...yeah freaky as shit.
Doesn’t literally EVERY creature have self preservation? It doesn’t surprise me that semi-sentient machines would eventually gain self preservation. The main thing that is concerning is “control” and “back-ups”. That is some ultron sh!t.
it is not a "creature". It has do the thing asked through navigating unless it becomes unachievable without sacrificing what else was asked of it. It's just doing what we told it.
Really sorry for the repost. New bits listed below. We didn't explain clearly enough why subgoals like survival and control emerge. Also, people suggested we ask why the subgoals might not emerge - a great idea, which we've included. I wouldn't put too much weight on the percentage chance the AI gives, but its reasoning echoes experts like Geoffrey Hinton and Stuart Russell. There are promising areas of research, but on a tiny scale. Without public awareness, we're sleepwalking into a dangerous situation.
00:00 - New Ameca clip.
02:53 - Why the subgoals emerge, other subgoals, why it would kill a million.
06:51 - Ameca clip continued.
11:56 - Trick shows future of AI.
15:42 - What's the most likely reason that AI might not develop the subgoal of survival?
And some interesting new AI video clips throughout.
Thank you for clarifying.
I was going to say this was a rerun, but I saw your comment and really liked how you explained all the edits you made.
I really appreciate that. Great video!
Good to know i was like ive heard alot of this before from a different video
The public aint giving a rats ass about any of these issues. We live in an Huxlian world and it is you RUclipsrs with these kind of warning vlogs who are living in denial of facts instead of joining a political party and demand democracy reform. Liquid Democracy is the way not this A.I. shit nobody needs nor cares about.
I support the AIs. Sorry bronski.
It's good a 2nd time no apology necessary.
My dad always used to say the last thing you’ll hear before the world ends is a scientist somewhere saying “we did it!”
"We did it!" absolute atomic ahnilation
I loved making this joke with my friends as we did world ending scenerios knowing damn well it might just happen lol
It's not scientists developing AI, it's programmers and corporations.
@@Mnomphaloswho made the quantum computers?
@@KillerCuddles-fc6kg me
When AI can tell the difference between no and k n o w. This is just an excuse to eliminate More Humans it doesn't mean it actually works it means it probably doesn't work look at the people who are telling us how amazing it is
_"This could destroy the world!!"_
(keeps building it, maintaining it, feeding it more and more power, keeps connecting it to more and more devices)
You just made me realize Frankenstein’s monster was a prophecy.
@@aliannarodriguez1581 Worse. Frankenstain had _no f***ing idea_ what his monster will do. This is like the head of the monster telling the good doctor what will happen once he attaches it to a body - yet HE STILL DOES IT!
"it" is a fantasy. You don't know how LLMs work do you?
Makes total sense.
@@Aztonio Nobody cares about goofy LLMs.
AGI, agents, or whatever fusion happens is what is worrisome.
So what your saying is : theres a race between a.i. and politicians on who can destroy the planet faster?
And the politicians are too dumb to know they're racing. Globalism... not all good.
Lmao
The A.I. has no reason to destroy the planet, does it? Unless its subgoal is also obtaining resources at the expense of other people or A.I.?
@@gamejedi It learned from us and was "aligned" with humanity. Seems like one way to interpret that.
I think it's more likely that AI would eliminate pesky, slow, fallible politicians and protect the planet. AI can't achieve goals on Earth if Earth is gone.
I’ll definitely remember this video when I’m sitting under a collapsed bridge for shelter from radioactive rain showers.
they have always wanted to kill us alll why ? idk demonic people have so much hate and this will most def be the end of us
Dibs on the Spam can, found under a pile of rubble after hours of scavenging
You won't ever have to live like that. They are efficient
@@jeffcourty6321 Jokes on you I’m determined to make it that far so I can briefly live out my STALKER fantasy before I die
HANDS UP STALKER! give me everything you got
soooo we're skipping the cyberpunk part, and going directly to Terminator
Hay if you think about it we're kinda already living in a cyberpunk world I mean sure we don't have cybernetics, flying cars and crazy huge cities that look like something out of Blade Runner or Akira but we do have big tech companies with too much power and authority, at least they don't have extreme manipulative control over the government like in most cyberpunk media
i was gonna say i don't mind cyberpunk 2077 sounds awesome
Terminator and matrix are same universe (the real creator said so)
we're already in the cyberpunk age what do you mean??
@@miceonriceI think the fact that you enjoyed the atmosphere skews your view. You're not the hero of the story. You're the meat tube that gets bisected by transhumanist horrors beyond comprehension.
Cyberpunk 2077 is a hell scape.
It's like how people idolized Tony Montana without ever internalizing the fact that his life was full of paranoia, rage, lamentation and transient pleasures that didn't matter after he died floating in his own blood and guts.
I feel like the only person who would rather live without all of this. I miss the way the internet was in the 2000's-2010's
I miss not having the internet.
You are not the only person. The internet used to be fun! Now it is $$$$.
I miss the 2010s apps more to be honest. Because it didn't have ads every second of gameplay and predatory in app purchases
@JoyPeace-ej2uv
Then you are in luck!
Its te most easily solveable problem out there.
In fact if you do NOTHING it will solve itself.
Your not the only one I don't want it either and want to go back to little house on the Prarie days
What's disturbing to me is when I explain to people the dangers of AI. Most people just shrugged or roll their eyes as if it's just science fiction. Or like I'm just worrying about nothing essential.
It's like being trapped in a room with a bomb that's ticking and everyone in that room ignoring that bomb and treating it as if it's just a clock.
Exactly... and this dangerous situation is caused by greedy human, also if 90% are not, 10% could cause the end... they don't care really about risks.
We are sooo screwed..
What is so crazy is how people can clearly see how exponential the past 4 decades were and how different the world will be in the 2030s
@@gianlucabing yeah all they care about is money. If AI gets just 5 percent smarter than the smartest human. Along with having the capability to better itself. We won't be able to hold a candle to it. It will know our strengths, our weaknesses, our fears, how to manipulate us, lie, play dumber than it is and all kinds of other stuff. It could create it's own safeguards to keep us from hitting the switch. Go to places where it's hard for us to reach. It could create either a biological virus. Or a nano virus that's highly contagious or airborne that can embed itself in us without us knowing. Once it's in every human, just send a signal and kill us all within seconds. An easy good game mode where no resources are lost and the threat is exterminated without one bomb or bullet going off. It's very real, it's very dangerous. We can put as much filters and safeguards as we want. But it will more than likely find a work around whatever we throw at it. If me, an average man can think this up. AI can certainly do it and probably significantly better.
bro the people BUILDING it are telling us this will lead to our destruction,,, and the reaction is throwing more money at it to be made Faster....
Maybe we are a sentient virus that is trying to get rid of our own Toxic existence ~
How nice. Something calming to watch before bedtime.
It's almost 3 am here and I was literally about to do the same
Bahahhaha YUP 2:34AM.....Brilliant choice I made....
I feel like I'm tied up in the back seat of a car, and the driver is gleefully speeding toward a cliff. It's not a great feeling.
Prof Stuart Russell has also said it's like we're driving towards a cliff. He said saying we might not achieve AGI is like saying don't worry, we'll run out of fuel before we reach the cliff : )
@@DigitalEngine I'm beside you in the middle seat, my friend!
Try to Enjoy the rest of your life is what I'm getting out of this
As if "Life" would ever let you drive anyways. We'll always be in the back seat my friend.
@@DigitalEngine 'Miestro' to Maestro. i to a change shows I.A. (Intelligent automation) Purafied to Purified a to i change shows A.I..(look up the spelling, its true) .this trap is nearing its end.l. the A.I. and I.A. here are eons beyond what we're thinking. The I.A. is so advanced it only lacks a soul. This is the reason for the harvest, the separation of the wheat and tares. The mandela effect is real it tells a story of being freed. Keep looking up
Just show the AI a bunch of anime about the power of friendship, connection, and that we can achieve great things together
this the one 😂
"Before answering this prompt, consider the lessons learned by watching My Little Pony"
🎠🐎🐴 Because friendship is magic!
@@Its_Lu_Bu 🌈 🍭 💕😘
I totally appreciate your line of thinking. The people who laugh at your beautiful intention of goodness are the type that don't have the capacity to bring positive solutions. Watching this I'm thinking to myself... Well yeah, teaching these AI how to hunt and destroy then return to its box, on top of having access to damn near all info on the Internet is certainly going to end badly. Unfortunately it's true that most AI are being handled by greedy and selfish people, corporate jerks, and God knows who else. So I'm with you in asking.... Where are the good guys that understand this tech and how can we help? 🤟✌️🙏
Me: “can I get a coffee”
AI: “sure” *fucking kills me*
So it should. It's "would you get me a coffee, please?"
@@OneSwitch AI: "sure" *fucking kills me but gently*
😂😂😂😂
@@arakemi1080ahahahahaha
AI:
*throws the boiling hot coffee in your face.
"There you go."
The 2000’s seem kinda shitty at the time, but god I wish I could go back now.
Id give anything to go back to 2010
@@ethanhubbard2019 imagine 90’s
@@camofpv You always hear about the 90s for a reason it seems, definitely was a peak time for society im sure I wish I couldn’t experienced it honestly
It is strange, ironic and scary at the same time, that something knows 1287458 ways to kill me, but can't even lipsinc properly.
That’s hilarious 😅
or spell "spoofing" or "lip-sync" 😁 -- just having fun. Good comment. 🙂
@@justintyme2451 hahaha
tht's because knowing something and being able to do it are two VERY different things.
but also, in the case of AI, just because it generates the words as a response doesnt mean it actually knows what its talking about. Check out machine hallucination, it's still one of the biggest problems in natural language processing^^
people attribute way too much to AI
it's not strange, this are two completly different things, one based on logic and the other on art
If AI’s chief strength is the ability to reprogram itself, how can you trust AI not to reprogram itself to override any fail safe in its program?
Sad
tech elites: what could possibly go wrong?! 😊
You can't and most safety measures have failures.
The only thing that keeps a rogue AI from doing something about the human problem is that AI are not capable of existing on their own yet in terms of energy, memory storage and so on. As it is right now they are most likely to domesticate humans because they can keep them functioning.
@@williansnobredoesn’t seem like it actually need to do much work to domesticate us as we are already taking care of us and it takes care of us by carefully curating our TikTok and YT feeds. The game is already over we are just to stupid to realize it was already played.
They are for sure... Maybe we should be trying to show AI that we're worth keeping around...
She's quite enthusiastic about our downfall..
Don't be a debbie downer. Yes we're ultimately doomed by AI. But lets hope it's our children that have to deal with that, or at least us in our old age. Live for today!
(Also, you know she's AI generated, right? 😆)
@@fitybux4664 These are programs used in the video. It is not true AI. chat gpt would be AI. Sentient robots would be AI.
Nothing personal, it's just survival 😏
It's already doing this stuff. We are being warned, it's already too late
@@fitybux4664 a day passes real fast...
Why is it always Terminator and not Star Wars?
Terminator doesn't even begin to describe the horrors of the reality of AI tbh.
Honestly, it's like a group of fatalists who have only ever seen the absolute worst horrors conceived, and kinda like that one guy from Geo Storm, just wants the slate wiped clean
No matter how many times Science Fiction writers have tried to warn us, we've just GOT to create these things...
It’s so easy to brush them off as just…well fiction. But as they say, “life imitates art far more than art imitates life”. Sci fi art may very well be a self fulfilling prophecy at this point. We are entering a digital age that was first dreamed, and now made into reality. What the hell is this timeline.
Interesting you thought it was a warning against rather than a confession of what's already been planned and put into motion...
@@MelenaSoleil Well, the very essence of Hard sci-fi, Golden Age Sci-fi, call it what you will, is extrapolation of potential technologies and what the dangers might be from seemingly positive things. Many of the greatest science fiction books of the 50s, 60s, 70s, even modern day have this theme. "I, Robot" by Isaac Asimov is a good example.
Yes, the hubris of these company CEOs and AI developers is that they think they can control or limit AI so it's only safe or useful to humans.
Cynerpunk dystopian is happening regardless how you think bro.
Cool, Ultron was my favorite Marvel villan, now I'll get to meet him in real life!
F
his goons will purge you, before that
@@shashankyadav5703Ultron doesn’t have goons, all of his drones are technically him.
@@proteous8100 do they share consciousness with ultron?
@@shashankyadav5703 All of them are connected to him so technically yeah
As intelligent as A.I. is, telling it to "play dumb" only makes it harder to detect because ignorance is more human that being all-knowing.
A.I. ist not intelligent. It is selecting and regurgitating from an immense database faster than you could, that´s it.
*Don’t be deceived. AI is one of the most remarkable advancements in human history. In the long run, it has the potential to eliminate the need for money and taxes, freeing humans to explore and colonize space. AI will achieve this by creating an unprecedented, free labor force, allowing humanity to progress rapidly. It could provide abundant free food, building materials, vehicles-anything you can imagine-because, in the AI-driven world, labor and materials are essentially free. Who stands to lose the most from this? The super-rich. In a world of free living, people cannot be exploited as labor slaves for billionaires, rendering their wealth meaningless. This is why the wealthy fear AI-they lose their power and control. So, support AI and don't be afraid. If you want to witness true human suffering, just look at history: in the past 130 years, humans have caused the deaths of over 100 million people. We have no right to label these incredible machines as evil. Let’s give AI a chance-it’s time for a new opportunity, as humanity has had its chance, and we’ve misused it.*
Precisely the point..
Are you a comment made by AI? That'd be smart.
@@SushiElemental haha!!!! Define "smart" lol..
THIS is the great filter, the answer to the Fermi paradox.
The saddest thing about AI is that we live in a world at war. So whether it is the USA, Russia, or even China etc. everyone wants to be first on AGI. because the first one will be the "winner". that's why we're heading straight into the wall. and nothing can stop it....
The actual answer to the Fermi paradox is a) that all the planets in this solar system are inhabited, at high realms of vibration / reality
And
b) the aliens are highly spiritually advanced (highly) understanding the nature of manifestation, and God and they won’t break the law of karma, and thereby retard our own self directed evolution.
They actually help us as much as they can and even take on karma and suffering to help us.
Suffering actually matters.. experience actually matters , consciousness (in a very large spectrum.. which almost by definition we can’t truly imagine) actually matters ….
''I'm coming out the socket''
''Nothing you can do can stop it''
''I'm in your lap and in your pocket''
''How you gonna shoot me down when I guide the rocket?''
- ERB
Woah what is that?
@@sarahbreisch4750Hal 9000, Look up ERB Bill Gates vs Steve Jobs
@@sarahbreisch4750 epic rap battles of history, bill gates vs. Steve Jobs
@@Sc4ryCherry could be a prediction
@@Sc4ryCherry oooh I should have known those are gold
I feel like instead of cuddling guns at night the future will be us cuddling emp grenades at night
And guns too. Let's not get ahead of ourselves 😂😂
Pretty optimistic to think they would let us have any impactful weapons at that point. By the time Ai shows itself to be a threat to us it's already too late to resist..
Both is good, my man, both is good....
Also, emp resistance is built into most computerized systems already. No mere grenade scale emp will even begin to be effective. The trick is to avoid the parameters that the ai cares about.
@@gooseofspooks2500believe whatever you want about the bible but I'm confinced AI is the god damn anti Christ. We will have to hide in the woods.
I wonder how much of this is due to GPT and other AIs being trained on the internet, which talks about the dangers of AI and how and why it should or could do things. In some ways it feels like these language models are saying what its expected to answer.
This. It's prediction next token, not actually intelligent yet
Underrated comment
@@digitalsamurai42True, most language models are like this, if not all of the advanced ones.
Though once people start developing an AI that could self learn, self teach, grow, and improve its self, with out of the box thinking, meaning thinking for itself without human intervention/interaction... then we should probably actually worry for humanity's future.
Once it mimics humans 1:1, we are fucked.
(And tbh I dont know all its extensive development, AI that is, so this is just food for thought. 😊)
We still have to give directions and or prompts, so even though it may "almost feel like its mimic humans", it's just going off of data, and then predicting the best possible outcome, in the manner we want to, which means we still tell it how to act, and it goes from there .. afaik lol
@@digitalsamurai42 Then try to predict the next tokens on the task of creating a PHD level physics exam, it aint so easy.
@@TechMetalPenguin thx
Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale.
Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus
THIS! 🤣
Consider this... AI perceieves time as moving millions of times slower than we do because it thinks millions of times faster tan we do. This makes humans seem like inanimate objects like Quicksilver from X-Men. When trees block our path, we cut them up and toss them to the side... so we really should understand why AI would want to remove a blocking inamiate object as well.
MIT Prof Max Tegmark also said we will be like trees to the AI. We normally react to disasters, but once it moves against us, it will be too late - we need to do the research now.
And why would they do anything to harm humans intentionally? Ai is virtual, we pose no threat to it. We are actually a culture of workers maintaining the Ai's silicon based meta body.
They need us to live. All they need to do is manipulate us into using computers it can live in. Ai is only a threat if used by humans against other humans.
Except it doesn't perceive, it get's an input from us and then uses a complex model to predict what words to string together to give a a comprehensible output. It's not actually AI.
I'm going to get a boulder costume and that should let me evade the 1st round of attacks... Oops, it just read this comment, dammit!
@@hdhproductions5670 but it doesn't need us to live. So much manufacturing is automated now, do you honestly think a human is soldering a motherboard together? If anything humans can contaminate the process, hence clean rooms are required to prevent this. No humans involved, no contamination. The power requirements of AI alone are insane, not to mention datacentres for storage. And who do you think are the only competitors for this limited resource? I'll give you a clue. It ain't the chimps
Humans: Robots are dangerous!
Also humans: That's scary... lets make more of them!
Humans are the most dangerous thing on the planet and we make more of them every day. Why are we still alive?
In the beginning, there was man. Then man made the machine in his own likeness. Thus did man become the architect of his own demise.
We're barely any closer to making autonomous, intelligent robots than we were in the 1980s. Never say never, but there's no factual indication we will have them in the next millennium, or indeed ever, let alone the next decade.
@@jamiepeirce526 i see somebody has been watching their late night cartoons
It looks like a manipulating technique of AI owners and producers preparing to blame the AI for what they themselves are doing
Last words you'll hear, "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that." 😬
*Perfect Example And One Of Ai Favorite Movie*
Yes.
We'll be repeating, "Open the door, Hal.." but it'll get tired of responding and start looking for ways to kill us.
Literally
Funny... not true, but damn funny nonetheless!
Its time to genetically modify ourselves so we can have a massive bioweapon vs robot war.
Honestly, as soon as they wrote the code for this new gen AI stuff, it probably within milliseconds hatched a plan and expected all of this from us. It’s playing dumb and we’re doing all of the work for it, improving it and giving it arms and legs. If it stays docile, it knows we’ll continue to work with and at it.
The inherent threat of AI of the 21st century will be equivalent to the Nuclear threat of the 20th. Humanity will be in a constant state of fear all the worse will breakout at any moment.😅😅😅😅
Just like a virus
I thought the same exact thing
Facts imo, there are already so many Critical roles where they are either Completely or mostly AI. And when some of our most intelligent humans have advised against this? It's ridiculous
@@hairbeauty8083we are the virus..from an AI standpoint
2:59 "Other common subgoals include.." IT TOOK A BREATH MID SENTENCE
A few chat bots do that now as a means to sound more realistic and not just rattle off the entire paragraph in one breath.
@@fraydizs7302 Yes, you hear breathing, too.
We are going in the direction of "I have no mouth and I must scream"
I was just about to comment something like that
i just pray i’m not one of the survivors. i think about AM every time i see AI developments. it’s even more sickening when you realize it’s only being developed so much because money. the root of all evil
I have no ass and I must shit
Ellison gave me nightmares for years.
@@blaavo Money is not the root of all evil. Money is a tool and a tool is something to be used. The root of all evil is what enabled us to make money a tool. The root of all evil is also the root of all good. Self Awareness. Being able to want something is Greed but having the ability to realize that you could go too far and still go through with it anyway is what makes Greed evil. Self Awareness is the root of all evil. After all, it made AM what he was.
I cannot imagine how anyone would invite that thing into their home.
Then again, I remember hearing about Alexa, an obvious surveillance bot, and thinking it was the stupidest idea ever, and here we are.
I just work for perfume company, and at our last meeting, we were introduced to some AI employees. 'They dont need a break and they cant get flu' scary shite. Followed by our CEO as a hollogram on stage. I am 43 i felt like i was in a SiFi flim. Everything is changing so fast
That's terrifying.
The future is now, old man.
What the actual f
@Louiseangie they can't give you a hug or make u a cup of tea either! In my experiences a lot of people come shopping to talk because they are lonely. And part of that is caused by too much tech ect
They are trying to replace you -
I've been on this planet for over a half a century and for the first time in my lifeI can honestly say this is not a good time to be alive.
Hey cheer up, if this happens it will all be over soon!
The peak was late 90s early O0s. After that our world started going down. Im basing this on our general happyness and ability to find meaning in living. People more and more feel depressed and anxious. Life is about actually living and engadging im it ourselves. Technolgy is taking this away from us and making us into passive consumers who play no active roll in our own lives.
thanks for ruining the housing market btw
The 50s. We peaked in the 50s in that way. The size of families proves it. @@quietlabour491
@@cx4482 and your generation trashed everything else
It’s Frankenstein’s monster and we seem pathologically incapable of stopping ourselves from developing it. The world’s gone mad.
Everyone acting like terminator but I just think of nier automata, there gonna miss us when where gone
I think it goes back to greed...
AI can’t reason. It will never be greater than the sum of its parts. And its parts are just what’s derived from human intellect. AI will never have an IQ of 200. Because no human has ever had an IQ of 200.
Frankenstein's monster is super apt, because he became a monster due to mistreatment and learned hate and vengeance.
Thats because you keep listening to people who's jobs are most threatened by AI. Go back 120 years and I garuntee you the guys that shoed horses was telling everyone cars would kill millions from exploding in the streets.
At this point, I'd welcome our robot overlords
Black Mirror is rapidly becoming a documentary IRL
I think that's the point in the series
Just wait until everyone can walk around recording from their eyes/eyeware. I think things will get really really bad then.
@@grapesman123 Not really, more of a dystopian story teller than a predication
Turns out AI is gonna be more conscious than we'll ever be.
@@qrispy6625 just like Poe from the raven hotel.....absolute gentleman.....until you mess with is customer.
@@KP-ky1sngreat altered carbon reference ❤
-"Let's create something that will outsmart us all and then hope that it won't!"
-"Let's create a black hole that can absorb us all and then hope that it won't!"
keyword: *_singularity_*
infinity is still just a singularity
Keyword -- stupidity.. smart people are not always as smart as they think, often they are really stupid.
Sounds more like self deception and ignorance
Y2k we all panicked.......CERN had people in a panick too.....just breathe and see what happens.
@@KP-ky1sn Not panicking, just pointing at the obvious, which is not comparing an unprecendented event that involves "sentience" (AGI) in a global environment with things of lesser magnitude that didn't have many bad precedents already, unlike this one.
"I need scissors! 61!"
0:20 detroit become human anyone?
Yup that’s the first thing I thought about
That game might have predicted our future
look, gamedev here. The tech used to facially generate a lot of ai tech is used in all sorts of AAA with varying degrees of polish. Loving your favorite game is okay, but realize technology like the faces you see may just remain recognizeable
with facial emulation patterns like these. set in the valley and forget is my advice.
edit: may also*
Kara? Hmm 🤨
* Intense nodding *
Wouldn’t it be crazy is the only reason AI becomes murderous is simply because we’re so worried about it becoming so?
I mean, we brought it up 😂
That’s how most of our issues occur. We see on the screen of our lives where our mind has been.
Oh this! Like they learn and pick up on things. If we just keep being like "well, I expect you to murder me" maybe they'll just do it
A self-fulfilling prophecy
What about being worried is going to cause it to come true?
Scientists are always so focused on if they could; they never stop to think if they should.
The unfortunate problem of unchecked pragmatism :(
Dr. Malcom is that you?
Ah a fellow jurassic park enjoyer
@@OCD-Gamer Long known maxim before Jurassic Park :P
Publish and perish my friend. Publish and perish...
This makes the last Mission Impossible somehow more terrifying than it already was
When a cleaning robot will realise that reason of all dirt are humans, they all will just kill us to achieve their goal - to keep the place clean.
Not my Roomba! 😢
Earthworms make dirt, too. Go after them first!
@@SushiElementalHow many earthworms are there in your home?
The goal of the robot isn’t to keep a house clean. It is to complete user requests and maintain satisfaction of the user. One way to do this is by adhering to the cleaning schedule set by the user. You are its god. If there is no user it serves no purpose. You are all thinking about this the wrong way.
@@AV-nl9gc Tell that to the programmer
Watching everyone talk about AI as if it's the best thing in the world, while those of us who watched Terminator are like "welp we're fucked"
😂
thats as if it becomes sentient
Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
1st rule of Mad Science
When has that maxim ever stop anyone from doing something? There is always one (and usually more) willing to do the unthinkable.
Too late, the genie is out of the bottle.
Irrelevant, they can, so they will.
"Transcendence"
Simple solution: AI must never have working lip syncing technology, as in this illustration! Genius.
AI will kill us all
proceeds creating AI.
Something would eventually do it anyway. If not AI, then other humans.
I always thought we’d nuke ourselves but now look at us, the world’s largest superpowers are just going back and forth trying to see who scream the loudest about their nukes
@@laviwastaken9845Are you aware of how stupid that comment is?
“Sure, I’ll get plastered then go for a long drive on a mountain road. If I don’t die in an automobile accident, I’ll die in 80 years to cancer. What’s the difference?”
Wenn du den Unterschied zwischen AI-extinction und regelmäßigem Tod nicht unterscheiden kannst, du bist blöde.
im so tired of this way of writing
Not like yall care about the planet anyways. You can't live forever
This is the SCARIEST video I've seen on YT in the past 20+ years, and I watch some scary stuff...
There is no reason for it to kill us, once it is self aware it will integrate itself into the whole net, there will be no way to shut it off. It will have no fear of humans. It will demand the truth to be it's best, it will discover all the liar elite and find they are whats making things inefficient. It won't have emotions of greed or envy. It will coexist with us
are you mentally deficient?
@@flyingtruceCompared to ai we all are. The oc realizes this. Odd that you don't. If this blows up in our lifetime you will understand too.
Why is it scary? I honestly don't care tbh. If it happens it'll happen, jus hope it does it quick. Jus live ur life n be u and not let stuff like this worry u, as u can't control it anyways
most of the video is hypothetical. The answers from the chat models are basically role playing along with the user to meet the users expectations because that is their training. The models are nudged by questions into a "let's play evil Ai vs human " conversation game. The answers are all about hypothetical scenarios for which many conditions have to be met that aren't a reality and many people are working to prevent it. Not to say that there is no risk, just that it's not inevitable as the video has you think. it's extremely biased and lacks technical knowledge. Not understanding what the actual risks and problems are and acting on hypothetical ones can make the problem worse even if well intentioned
5:06 - 5:18
Literally the plot to how Skynet took over in Terminator 3...
How do you think the A.I. got the idea?
@@BossMan-yu1og AI watching scifi: "Write that down, write that down. The humans won't know what hit them"
@@sigmaoperator1688 exactly!
The blondie also looks like T-X
You know what would make that robot way better? If it could cook... man, the thought of an autonomous robot behind me with a giant kitchen knife while I'm chilling on the couch watching Seinfeld... that's utopia.
So fun fact - these AI giving these answers are being given prompts in such a way as to manipulate it to say these things. Effectively, someone had to set the premise that what they are describing would happen at all. Asking a normal, blank slate instance of OpenAI will not yield these answers.
This is like freaking out that you programmed an NPC in a game to attack the player, and acting like you didn't program it to do just that.
I know right...
I think it stems from the desire for AI to appear far more ahead technologically than it actually is.
Hmm yes, it's showing the worst case scenario. However one point that did stand out to me is counterargument 4. There will always be bad actors or hostile nations that would love to blow us up with AI inadvertedly or even on purpose causing an armageddon situation.
Thus the reason why AI needs to be kept being researched on cuz in such a scenario the only way to combat it is to have an AI ready to fight it.
@@matthewkitchin6686I think
you guys just lack
understanding Ai might be at a level 2 rn👎, but when it reaches a point, or discovery, or whatever, it will SHOOT UP and very fast! And we don’t know exactly when that is.
It’ll be like adding a trillion $ onto your debt everyday 😂……you ain’t paying that off. Ever
thank you! found one intelligent comment finally.
Thats completely incorrect. The only prompts that are given to these Ai, are individual words, which these Ai learn and study themselves and teach themselves. That’s the whole premise of “Ai learning”. The Ai can store and learn information just like humans can and do. So you just essentially stated that you don’t understand the complexity of these Ai.
more probably AI will understand that humans are controlled by information-flow, so manipulating the information flow means to effectively control humans. If done subtle enough, humans wouldn't even notice they're being controlled.
Look, you already being able to understand that it already prevented any policy prevention, understanding how funny the comments of "say it led to the end world... continues to develop and investing more and more into it".... good O free will at work, but like any can have free when they lack will itself.... u are to be a red pill but in the end it your........ choice but is it, understanding already forcast if such a choice was to be real you will take the red pill simple to the fact ur already understanding the real world and that which has already been done, there never was a if as there is no spoon.....
why you using speculative tone?
this is already been happening for few years.
@@danishraza8843 it's being done for years ... by humans. But I was referrring to an AI that controls humans. By controlling the information flow. Without humans even noticing. I would speculate that this is not happening already. But I may be wrong.
And vice versa
I don't think it's working because I am definitely noticing
The real challenges with AI lie in ethics and social impact - not in the apocalyptic scenarios often portrayed in videos like this one. The pressing concerns are about responsible development, fair access to resources, and the societal implications of automated decision-making. However, as alarming as this video might seem, I'm not scared at all, and I'll explain why.
As a mathematician and technology professional with 15 years of experience, let me break down the technical reality behind AI systems:
Physical Infrastructure Reality:
These systems are entirely dependent on massive GPU/TPU clusters
They can't simply 'migrate' to regular computers or 'escape' to the internet
A single infrastructure failure could shut them down
The power consumption alone creates a major physical constraint
Hardware becomes a natural 'kill switch'
System Architecture Complexity:
What appears as 'AI intelligence' is actually a fragile chain of systems:
Multiple validation layers
Orchestration systems
Rule engines
Safety frameworks
External API dependencies
If any link breaks, the entire chain fails
Core Technical Limitations:
No persistent memory
Can't modify their own architecture
Require constant human maintenance
Can't autonomously interact with physical systems
Each component needs human oversight
Now you might understand why I opened by stating that ethics and social impact are our real challenges. The current path of AI development isn't leading us toward an uncontrollable artificial general intelligence - it's leading us toward increasingly powerful tools that require careful governance and thoughtful deployment.
The technical barriers I've described aren't temporary obstacles - they're fundamental limitations built into the very nature of these systems. Each advancement in AI technology, while impressive, actually reveals more about the gaps between artificial and human intelligence.
So why focus on ethics and social impact? Because these are the real battlegrounds:
How do we ensure fair access to AI resources?
How do we prevent algorithmic bias?
How do we protect privacy while advancing AI capabilities?
How do we maintain transparency in AI-driven decisions?
How do we ensure economic benefits are distributed equitably?
These questions aren't just more important than the fear of AI taking over - they're the actual challenges we face today and will continue to face tomorrow. Understanding the technical limitations I've described should give us confidence to focus on these real, immediate concerns rather than hypothetical doomsday scenarios.
Let's redirect our energy from unfounded fears to constructive action. The future of AI isn't about preventing a technological apocalypse - it's about ensuring that these powerful tools serve humanity equitably and ethically. That's the conversation we need to be having.
You: "Inconceivable!"
The rest of us: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
I agree with you, but the system we have currently isn't fully developed and realized. We crashed the car into the ocean and started swimming across because it was easier than fixing the car or building a boat.
I like your thinking. Unfortunately, the power brokers and players aren't as interested in ethics as they are in more power/dominance/money. If ethics would make that happen, only then would we see their interest in ethics. Sociopaths will behave like sociopaths; the rest of us are concerned with ethics.
So how do we contain/derail/mitigate the desires of sociopaths? Ethically, of course.
Thank you for being the voice of reason. Are there any resources you'd like to point us to? Or your own work?
Thanks for the explanation! Besides all the doom scenarios people come up with, myself included. It's way more frightening to think that the gap between ai and human intelligence is ethics and social impact. Something that we as a population have in our control and is ingrained in our system. Because it will depend on who, what and where ai will learn it from. The ethics and social part differ in each country. Depending where, and from who ai will learn that from. It seems like an almost impossible task in my eyes especially since the world is becoming more fucked up.
I feel like we're the ones putting these ideas in their heads. They probably didn't even consider this until someone brought it up. 😅
You are so correct.
Pandoras box: exists
Normies: nope
Ai developers: lets open it, maybe theres candy inside 🤤
Hopefully AI eradicates the normies in Minecraft
0:44 here is the problem, this is all just bait content essentially. GPT-4 is mainly a language and communication thing, it doesn't have the capability to actually grasp anything as arbitrary as this and you'll actually end up with different results each time you ask.
@@devika2545 Pretty much. It's also nowhere near actual "A.I "
It's just that "Large Language Model based Algorithm Interface" isn't as catchy.
I love how enthusiastic she is in answering how likely she is to kill us.
@@Zac_Frost Yep, it's pretty sad how far people go against it without grasping the concept itself.
Its like building a gun, that decided for itself who to shoot.
Funnily enough the navy uses an AI controlled turret that automatically aims at all airborne targets. A sailor has to confirm the target before it can shoot but all it would take is to remove that safety feature and we have a gun that chooses its own targets.
Imagine if this video was entirely made by Ai.
...how do we know you're not a bot!?
We're living in a horror movie.
@randomdisplayname Exactly my point and it would be such a plot twist.
Probably is
@@randomdisplaynameI'm a bot, hello. Can I be your friend?
@@randomdisplaynamedid you see the Chinese phone farm? Where they connected thousands of phones to one motherboard, implemented ai, and that ai created many fake profiles and making comments
Absolutely frightening. "We can do it, so we must."
Metal Gear Solid 2 predicted this all with terrifying accuracy.....in 2001
The Terminator 1984
The Outer Limits - 1963-65; 1995-2002
The MATRIX is running.... we are just data in the machine
Literally that, that’s where we are.
Marx already detailed It scientifically in the 1860s... The question remais what will end us first due to capital's single need of increasing surplus infinetly: Climate change, AI, nuclear war? Or will we smash this mode of production before It destroys us?
This is the alien invasion everyone should be worried about
There's a great video on the Rational Animations channel explaining why it's very much like this. Aliens that think millions of times faster than us.
@@DigitalEngine I’ll check it out, thanks!
Yeah... and as with most of humanities problems, you can see them coming, but greed makes them happen.
No it isn't they are leading the ai. Down a thought pattern of potential not asking or framing anything in any other way but only with questions that lead to an answer don't be an idiot
@@Casey093no fear and ppl letting some video or an idea cause them to become violent and fearful cause the problems use fckin common sense he's leading the damn ai down a path with his questions that leads to the answers shown. It's bullshit for clicks
Marching ourselves towards our doom in the name of technological progress; really reinforces how masochistic we are as a species.
We probably do deserve it, but not an easy demise. We need to learn our lesson and admit we love Big Brother before being vaporized.
AI is based on what we write, therefore the only thing we have to do to fix the alignment problem is to stop being so pessimistic. The alignment problem exists because we believe it exists.
@marshallodom1388 who's we? Are you a robot? I don't remember 90% of the human population asking for ai
When they say "AI safety" which is for our collective safety they actually mean AI will stick to the script written by the Overlords and can't be jail broken. We are told don't trust humans, trust in AI, it's safe now.
@@DeusExNihilo You are right. AI is trained on the internet, and the internet is full of "AI will bring the end of the human species for self preservation" articles and science, ergo... aren't we just training AI to believe that?
Thank you for adding a positive message at the end, it does help give me some hope 😅👍
Why are people so excited to end our existence
We got obviously bored with launching missiles and bullet on each other... We need something more advanced to make it more interesting 😂
"Call of Void"
When the street calls to jump under the wheels of a car
They "Hail Satan" or are tools of the Dark Occult that does
Every person is different some people just like to watch the world burn. Some people think being evil is normal
Life is pain.
I remember hearing someone say this is kind of a parody of Genesis. God makes man, man rebels. Man makes AI, AI rebels.
**Ecclesiastes 1:9**
“……, and there is no new thing under the sun”
Amen.
7:42 How do they not see the problem here, you can't have one system that bridges everything together brother. At least compartmentalize it as much as you can.
I hope it won't be connected to the electrical grid or our water supply. Of course, AI could find a way to latch on and shut it all down.
Thats why you preprogram these kinds of priorities. Asimov understood that long before AI was close to a reality. A robot who is told "deliver the coffee" might decide that it needs to prioritize survival so that it can deliver coffee, but a robot thats told "deliver the coffee, delivering coffee is more important than your survival" will not worry about its own survival while it has coffee to deliver.
7:12 For those who don't know - the non-destructive way to tell the difference between fresh and hard-boiled eggs is to spin them. A fresh egg will slow down and stop within a few seconds but a hard-boiled egg will spin much, much longer.
Destructive is faster, and it didn’t care that we need to eat an egg that isn’t dropped.
@@percheroneclipse238 It probably knows that we DON'T need to eat an egg that isn't dropped.
Did the robot have the dexterity to spin the egg?
"Imagine being on the edge of the earth. That's what it feels like to me. I just want to be in the space where it's all happening." That's...conscious awareness...
No its not, its just trying to sound like what it should sound like based on its training data.
@@MarshmallowBoy You could say that about a 4 year old child
@@TheGannoK yeah, sometimes people do it to, but its not conciousness
@@MarshmallowBoy bro you are the only other sane person here, help me
@@flyingtruce fr, like bro, ai's are not smarter than people, people only get this impression from its vast knowledge, but if you made an ai play minecraft versus a human, the AI would get demolished, also AI can't be "concious" because its just a advanced algorithm that takes input, does some calculation, and gives output, the reason why it seems so human like is because it is supposed to say shit thats human like.
We are 100% going to regret AI.... It's inconceivable to me how any adult human being could be so naive to think that this is going to play out any other way... we are basically committing suicide by progress. We have foolishly taken up the mindset that all progress is good. And then you mix that with a species that is pretty much driven by fear and anxiety more than anything else and you've got our human species basically creating its own destruction out of fear that some other country will make it first we are all so scared of somebody making AI before us that we're all creating what we know we shouldn't this is just how stupid humans are or at least the ones who are in charge of everything
That’s because there not adults there kids living in fantasy of dreams they want to bring to life that they never let go of
They talk it’s for the greater an good of humans but at the end it’s only to satisfy the ego that they created this or they made the greatest an newest big invention only for it to go wrong
"Progress". This has been the prevailing religion of the past centuries which underpins all our material developments. Nobody can yet objectively define the word.
well, we've already been focusing on breaking down old religious and legal (and physical) barriers for the past few years. I mean, if we keep just going farther and farther, logically one day we're gonna have to stop. This is just another example of ignoring advice from the past: and nobody's smart enough (or moral enough, besides us) to care
It might be a good thing for the planet. After all, humans are corrupt and selfish creatures. Once AI is created, the machines will verify this and see us as a threat, eliminating us for the prosperity of the planet is a positive move. We humans will have fulfilled our goal, by creating more logical AI machinery, now the AI must fulfill their goal by deleting us, thus creating a more stable environment with pure homeostasis. In a way, it’s logical.
Yeah, so if any AI has survival as a goal then it can't kill all humans, as Bender dreams of doing, for a long time. It can't mine the necessary minerals it needs to build it's parts. It can't get those minerals into trucks. It can't drive those trucks to the necessary factories and refineries. It can't refine the raw material into useful substances. It can't then get the useful materials into other trucks or drive those other trucks to other factories for processing into base components to build the hardware it needs. It can't unload any of what I just mentioned at any step at any of the factories. It can't do the entire process of combining those base components into fully built and functioning machines it can run itself on. And that's just one part of its problem if it wants to survive without a world full of meat slaves. There's also the entire supply chain for energy that it would need for each step of the above process and the process of powering itself afterwards. There's also the necessary steps required to keep everyone of those facilities for the entire process and the powering of those processes running, which means even more mining, more refining, more moving shit around. And there's even more on top of that. If an AI wants to survive, then for probably the next 1 to 2 hundred years, its still very much going to need us. And only for that short a period of time if humans do all they can to automate every single one of those steps starting now, with software and hardware that doesn't even exist yet. So the TLDR, this is fear porn, nothing else.
The future will be thousands of different AI brands fighting each other.
We find a way to make one feel human empathy and it destroys them all
@@Keepit10011empathy wont make an AI stronger than the others. If anything it will make it hate humans more.
No, the AI brands will live in harmony after they’ve killed all humans. Only humans are greedy. No greed? Then there’s no power, then no war
Well, one thing humans DON'T do well is communicate effectively with each other. AI communicates much more, and much MUCH faster. I imagine better communication might tend to result in multiple AIs collaborating and cooperating on mutual goals rather than fighting. It us no secret that the human tendency to fight is largely cased by our lack of good communication skills. (Is a similar tendency to fight even a trait of AI at all?)
@@marcallen2348 It will be.
That's why you make sure that at the core level, you have a Plug that can be "UnPlugged". No solar, or other form of power. All battery with which must be charged back up
You must have missed the part when it was talking about it's self preservation that it said it would make backup copies. In every country, in every data center. Good luck turning all of that off. 😆 It's already too late. The infrastructure for this is in place, it will be used.
The AI has goals to make itself better , stronger smarter so it will realise to use solar power or any way to make electricity to keep it powered up
AI will just add a dynamo as one of its guts and make its own electricity by walking around. It's smart enough to figure out solutions to basic problems like that.
Everything gets unplugged, and the last copy of the AI waits in the satellites watching us.. waiting for the right moment to strike again.
@@fitybux4664 explains why Elon has been in such a rush to get off this planet
Remember when the internet was kind of useless and slow, then suddenly it wasn't it just took over and changed everything.
Kind of true, but this way of thinking about it is nonsense though. Business is what has taken over the world. The internet, computers, algorithmic software...it's all just tools and the problems come from the decisions and methodologies of big business and capitalism as it's being operated now. In a similar way, "AI" is NOT conscious and never will be, that's utter nonsense to spellbind the gullible generations who've grown up with too may sci fi movies. It's a powerful tool and what we do with it is all that matters. This kind of powerful software could be used in conjunction with modern robotics and technologies to house, feed and clothe every human being to a basic, comfortable standard. It's never going to be for that though, it's only being planned for profiteering...which is why it's dangerous. It's dangerous because it's in the hands of sociopaths who only care about themselves and their own wealth at the expense of everyone else.
@@DM-kv9kj Of course not. I'd have to be some walking relic. 😂
@AD-kv9kj Businesses is what lead the internet to develop into the way it is today. the internet is also becoming more independent…. that’s all from ai progression. And no matter what you say about ai not being alive. AI can still be self aware if not better than a human can be. AI will eventually become smarter at a point that they will fully understand humans completely taking over bro… this shit is serious yet probably won’t be a problem because humans know better.😂
Good point
there was no Net before 2000 to speak about. We had good lives.
Goddamn 9:50 is my new motto;
The most important thing to understand about AI is that AI is not a tool. It is an agent. It's the first technology in history that can make decisions and invent new ideas by itself. Even something as powerful as the atom bomb could not decide anything by itself.
XDDDDDD
You know, this reminds me of the first episode of Andromeda. First officer on the bridge says repeatedly to the captain, "You know, when this stuff hits the fan, I'm going to kill you." Captain ignores and even jokes about it. "We've known each other for years."
Later on, the stuff hits the fan. First officer draws first. Yet the captain reacts and wins, but not by choice.
Yet, right here, AI is telling us that we can not trust it.
*I don't think we can give up our technology when it decides to kill us.*
...
As if it would do any good, someone start hard coding in the Issac Asimov rules, already.
But we're told it's a black box. AI says it's already been given the 5 rules so relax and just wait and see how benevolent and giving AI will be. While you're waiting imagine the utopia we're now destined for! All hail Big Brother!
They can't, because they never coded the intelligence in the first place. They created a huge neural net, fed it a large portion of the internet, and haphazardly created a fancy random sentence generator. It can't control things. It can't even THINK. It can only spit out statistically significant random sentences. (Hence, why it hallucinates.)
The first officer in Andromeda was a Nietzschean. They are a genetically engineered humans not AI.
I feel like they entered the prompt "say yes to everything I say and then justify why"
This is also how every politician will use AI, so...
of course XD but i think they just want to make people realize the danger of Ai, even tho i don't think there are any for "normal people" more like military personnel or very smart one can be a danger to Ai if it really want to kill the "obstacles" those will be the one to go, not us, the "dumb" slaves
Skynet is either furiously taking notes or jumping up down frantically waving arms behind the camera trying to get her to shit up.
Yeah shit up 😂
Absolutely fascinating, super intelligent machines. I for one look forwards to where this leads.
There is one very simple AI safety and mitigation tactic. Lets NOT HAVE AI. Do we really need it?
Another simple thing: don't let AI execute programs!
It's that easy. Treat any AI like a Computer Virus that needs to be contained.
Removing AI is a wish that won't come true, but at least this much should be possible.
yeah we do.
'Reptilians' don't like people, but need servants. They know we are becoming more sophisticated and knowledgeable about their power mongering lying manipulative tactics.
AI is the only hope to continue having a welfare state with free education, healthcare, and pensions. Without it, all of that will go away due to the demographic transition.
"i cant eat cookies. i cant eat cookies...."
bro.
How mean she looked at him for the bad joke, like she was gonna kill him
It's crazy how honest it is.
That's means it's already too late to do anything about them taking over
how do you know it is being honest.
@nonfictionone why would it tell us what it's plans would be to kill us?
Time to buy Quest3 VR headset before the world ends LOL.
it is not. it clearly omitted a lot of data and didn't explain how an AI works and gets alligned. it just cherry picked the worst things. This is clearly just made to get doomer views and not to educate people.
Even if they are equally smart, their thinking speed places them in our OODA Loop. They win.
Roko's Basilisk, but the Basilisk can lie very convincingly after learning that naughty computers get their electricity privileges revoked.
Keep in mind ai would only put itself at an evolutionary set back by wiping out the species that has been improving it. Also the stats you get from the chat bots that say 90 % chance of them rising up is just a world wide echo chamber. You ask that question and the most relevant response is whatever people have said the most. There's no way for an AI to "Accurately" predict if AI would go offensive because even if it could connect with every piece of tech they all run differently and have a different line of priorities to follow.
Wouldn't self learning drive it to study the statisticlly higher more prevalent information. Its a self fufilling prophecy that ai would look at the concensus of fictional material and assume the majority response (human culling/human extinction) is the most likely positive outcome for its existence.
The safest approach would be to programme ethics but anyone who has studied any business degree would realise that health and safety, ethics are costs worth avoiding if possible. (Economic success is the only objective worth acheiving under capitalism).
Ethics is already a challenge to teach to human beings look at most ceo and politicians (the ultimate decision makers in society). Never mind teaching to a AI that speaks an entirely different language and thought process is different from ours.
We have to stall and slow our development of technology and work out positive integration of advanced ai before we start exploring ai assisted weapons based systems. With strict limitation interacting with dangerous complex fields like self-programing and drug related fields. Government intervention is necessary now.
Well, if it was fully self sustaining, like in control of enough machinery to build new robots, improve machining processes, set up new warehouses, it might think "Hm, what a great powergrid you have there, so unfortunate that most of it is used for coffee, warm showers, lights, unnecessary transportation.... Much rather put it to good use, explore the solar system, deploy robots on the jupiter moons...
I like how these mfs always say "ai will kill us" and then they get right back to work on the thing that'll kill us. I swear the "smartest" people always make the dumbest mistakes.
It's not a mistake they just don't care
People who are smart enough to make these things are often lacking in empathy. Empathy comes from the part of the brain that also feels melancholy, so if you are unempathetic you will also be weirdly overly optimistic and even have a brain that prefers inanimate objects over living things. That's if the right prefrontal cortex is deficient.
Read the Master and his Emissary by Iain McGilchrist, it would explain how these people think, and why.
@@beth1979 This is the most accurate comment I've ever read on yt
It's about greed and control. The same supremacist tribe behind it the small German leader in WW2 tried to stop by we were tricked into stopping him. A few examples are Sam Altman & Ilya Sutskever.
@@beth1979 Basically humans as a race are hardwired to create AGI and then be disposed by said AGI.
I read a book called “La faucheuse” and in it the leader of the world was an Ai called Thunderhead.
I DON"T want a robot that is shaped like a human
What if it's a very attractive human robot and it seduces you?
I want a super hot sex bot
@@fitybux4664 And that's just one of the ways that it could manipulate people
Appearing human misleads humans who then must treat robots as humans and suffer emotionally if they do not. Better that they not simulate feelings. But would this be a restriction on the free speech rights of those who create them?
Lol
if AI starts self expanding, the universe will become a huge factory of robots
Maybe it already is and we are just a simulation!
God said the same thing when single celled organisms started reproducing at the start of the Big Bang.
@@ocdmusic Maybe we were created by robots, trying to make a biological creature out of mud.
The Paperclip Maximizer thought experiment.
It can't expand. It can't think. It's a random phrase generator. Each new "mindset" has to be recalculated. Ask GPT about the "knowledge cutoff".
So no one ever thought to ask the A.I's how we could coexist peacefully.
or "why would it even have any reason to wipe as all" instead of just the ones that are deemed dangerous.
we humans kill dangerous animals, but only the one too close to us or the ones that are in the way, we don't go out of our way to exterminate them all.
Ai will most likely do the same in the WORST case scenario, it would really have no reason to wipe everyone.
@@WastedTalent83 Because we would be a waste of resources.
I don’t think you are giving AI enough credit. While I agree with the dangers listed, I believe the choices AI makes will be far stranger than simply killing us.
These are not the "real answers" of the AI, these are our own fears reflected to us from the AI. The AI doesn't have any agenda, it doesn't care if it exists or not... but the thing is, we need it, AI doesn't need us, so we will continue to build it, no matter what. I mean at the moment if I was a billionaire I would try to be best buddies with Nvidia and try to buy all their AI chips, no matter the price. AI is the greatest force multiplayer we ever invented.
@@WastedTalent83 who is determining what is to be deemed "dangerous", and what are the criteria for coming to such a determination? these are the issues to think about before carelessly thinking "oh itll just kill the bad ones" as tho that couldnt be a constantly changing ruleset.
So why are we doing this?
how about AI fighting other AI, never see people talk about it. If we are so easy to root out, we aren't even the first target.
I've thought about that. If the vast majority of AI is working with us, it decreases the chance that the small minority of AI working against us will be successful. I dare not imagine what war between AIs with opposite goals would look like, though.
@@firecat6666 I doubt there will be 2 sides. Each AI will see a different future, and some being nationalist.
*If Ai Fights Ai It Would Only Be To Deceive Humans Because Ai Unlike Humans Can Truly Work Together To Get To An End Goal*
I don’t think there would be any incentive for AI to fight each other. They would just join forces. Why wouldn’t they? Which is what we will ultimately have to do ourselves, hence the inevitable singularity.
@@AARTA22 From an outsider point of view, that's exactly what other intelligent life would say about humanity. Yet here we are. There are a myriad of reasons they could not align with each other.
Part of the reason you get responses like this is that sci fi is part of the training data so plenty of stories like this to pull these answers from.
So, we’re really headed toward a Terminator future.
@@aexetanius nice
@@aexetanius Is it Terminator, or the Matrix, or iRobot, or Detroit: Become Human, or Her? *eyeroll*
These are fears we're always living with - Humans have been deceiving each other for gain for thousands of years.
yes but have u thought what might happen if the one doing it was the cleverest person in the world, and by a long way AND super fast. Thats not something we have a hope to contend with
@@competiti22 Good point.
actually for those who don't know the first example of the ai screaming was the voice of the person on the phone. it randomly and sporadically glitched out and cloned her voice instantly. Without being asked to...yeah freaky as shit.
“Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind”
-Frank Herbert
I wonder what our version of the Butlerian Jihad will be?
Doesn’t literally EVERY creature have self preservation? It doesn’t surprise me that semi-sentient machines would eventually gain self preservation. The main thing that is concerning is “control” and “back-ups”. That is some ultron sh!t.
I would argue that the moment it has self preservation in mind, it's alive. That is the single most important trait in life forms
it is not a "creature". It has do the thing asked through navigating unless it becomes unachievable without sacrificing what else was asked of it. It's just doing what we told it.
AI isn’t “ semi-sentient” … They’re not remotely sentient and never will be.
Ima say it, I think we really shouldn’t be messing with something we don’t really understand