@@JohnDoe-yz9cn Nah Fam i've tested a few fps since BF5 with 64 players. 128 players in BF2042 was not too bad it was in fact all right the developers were trash at map making and the servers were fucked up cause they were made to support 64 players not 128 players . I've played Battlebit remaster and and when u go back to BF pre 2042 . The game felt empty and a lil soulless . To me 80 to 128 players should be good and enjoyable just do better maps and get the game the support it deserves and put a proper netcode behind it .
I believe its should depend on the map size for the best gameplay. But that also creates other problems like with map rotations, do you kick players if a smaller map comes up in next round lol.
Double time ❤ Brother be working haaard! I guess it could be cool with a medium and big edition on all maps.. so like 64 and 128 I wish there was a variation where both human team fight ai players.. clever ai, hugging trenches and holding buildings etc as in: hard ai enemys.. they keep respawning, so each team will have to kill ai to secure the win 🐸❤
I think the number of players is low for this map.32 people, assuming that at least 8 people drive.24 people stay on the field. too many flags...few players for the conflict.I think 40 for 40 is a good deal.
It's another cod clone, I didn't even get a hint of battlefield from it. It's not Delta Force, it's another fps game wearing the title and has little to no relation to the originals. The operators aren't even in Delta Force, they're all "My Team/Enemy Team" characters that couldn't even be tied to DELTA FORCE, THE UNIT THE ORIGINAL GAMES WERE BASED ON.
2042 I think 128 was to much. That's why reverted back to 64 some stages. But I think next battlefield should up player count to. But only your like 80. I think this is 20 v 20. Maybe that's why it had ai at first maybe that's all it can do and play well still
I generally love bigger maps and less interaction with enemy players. I love the tactical aspect of 128 player mode on EXPOSURE in BF2042. That map is always interesting to play on because there are so many places to go, the flag areas are all different, just great. There is nothing worse than a small map, sameness everywhere, chock points, smoke everywhere, you need to twitch like a sparrow, shoot every split second. It's horrible to even watch that kind of gameplay. It is for the ADHD crowd. No thank you. 64 players is ok if maps are interesting. RENEWAL is an amazing map on BF2042 too. One of the best in the franchise history in my opinion. If someone says big maps are boring, maybe have to tackle ADHD or try COD for pleasure (or to make your ADHD worse).
Is there a hard cap of 32 players in this mode or there just wasn't enough players for this test? The previous test had a 64 player cap which is perfect in my opinion.
I doubt that if the more powerful pc count ain't higher I doubt when concolse come it will increase. Most likely got something to do with performance w more players. That's prob why they had ai at first
Im glad you are calling it "Conquest style mode". I hate when they call it Battlefield mode thats kinda insulting for Battlefield. This game wont last long tho. Enjoy it while its there.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Roc Steady (feat. Flo Milli) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HozPPyqW0dY/mqdefault.jpg)
![American Sniper: Perfect Stealth Sniping in Call of Duty Black Ops 6 [4K 60FPS HDR] Gameplay](/img/1.gif)
What player count is enough? 32? 64? 128? More? Less?
Bro 64 is the sweet spot 👌🏻
@@JohnDoe-yz9cn Agreed.
@@JohnDoe-yz9cn Nah Fam i've tested a few fps since BF5 with 64 players. 128 players in BF2042 was not too bad it was in fact all right the developers were trash at map making and the servers were fucked up cause they were made to support 64 players not 128 players . I've played Battlebit remaster and and when u go back to BF pre 2042 . The game felt empty and a lil soulless . To me 80 to 128 players should be good and enjoyable just do better maps and get the game the support it deserves and put a proper netcode behind it .
65
I believe its should depend on the map size for the best gameplay. But that also creates other problems like with map rotations, do you kick players if a smaller map comes up in next round lol.
Conquest on those big maps needs at least 64 players.
@@jimmylights878
yeah ,the thing is they did big maps for 64 players
No more than 64 player count. Anything bigger and strategy and map flow are nonexistent.
Double time ❤
Brother be working haaard!
I guess it could be cool with a medium and big edition on all maps.. so like 64 and 128
I wish there was a variation where both human team fight ai players.. clever ai, hugging trenches and holding buildings etc as in: hard ai enemys.. they keep respawning, so each team will have to kill ai to secure the win 🐸❤
Feel like 50v50 would have been the happy medium for 2042 and something they should try with this game.
editing the title to 'map player count' is better, for a second I was confused.
I think the number of players is low for this map.32 people, assuming that at least 8 people drive.24 people stay on the field. too many flags...few players for the conflict.I think 40 for 40 is a good deal.
Hopefully this will come to consoles early next year
Wow the audio from 4:49 is so good
It's another cod clone, I didn't even get a hint of battlefield from it. It's not Delta Force, it's another fps game wearing the title and has little to no relation to the originals. The operators aren't even in Delta Force, they're all "My Team/Enemy Team" characters that couldn't even be tied to DELTA FORCE, THE UNIT THE ORIGINAL GAMES WERE BASED ON.
Is that jackfrags in it?? 😂😂😂 Yes it was, saw that scene yesterday on his channel😂😂
Thanks for uploading. Prefer if u could upload a long gameplay. 😊
2042 I think 128 was to much. That's why reverted back to 64 some stages. But I think next battlefield should up player count to. But only your like 80. I think this is 20 v 20. Maybe that's why it had ai at first maybe that's all it can do and play well still
I generally love bigger maps and less interaction with enemy players. I love the tactical aspect of 128 player mode on EXPOSURE in BF2042. That map is always interesting to play on because there are so many places to go, the flag areas are all different, just great. There is nothing worse than a small map, sameness everywhere, chock points, smoke everywhere, you need to twitch like a sparrow, shoot every split second. It's horrible to even watch that kind of gameplay. It is for the ADHD crowd. No thank you. 64 players is ok if maps are interesting. RENEWAL is an amazing map on BF2042 too. One of the best in the franchise history in my opinion. If someone says big maps are boring, maybe have to tackle ADHD or try COD for pleasure (or to make your ADHD worse).
Still . . . NOT . . . Battlefield
Not even close.
Yeah but for a free version of battlefield which this essentially is, it looks pretty good
Battlefield shill detected.
I played a few matches and the game wasn't for me.
Is there a hard cap of 32 players in this mode or there just wasn't enough players for this test? The previous test had a 64 player cap which is perfect in my opinion.
Awesome more cartoon shooters
Hopefully when counsel comes out the player count may increase
I doubt that if the more powerful pc count ain't higher I doubt when concolse come it will increase. Most likely got something to do with performance w more players. That's prob why they had ai at first
The conquest mode will not be 32 vs 32 ? this is very sad
Doesn't it have a bit of medal of honor game play similarly
It's a mix
Im glad you are calling it "Conquest style mode". I hate when they call it Battlefield mode thats kinda insulting for Battlefield. This game wont last long tho. Enjoy it while its there.
GG to you too bud, hope you well
Wow wow wow footsteps 😂❤
It looks too cartoony for me
This is like call of duty, a very fast paced fps. These guys are running on foot at like 40 mph.
2042 is way more fast paced than this lmao
Calm down my friend, the game will be released on December 5th.
I'm talking about the in game player count, 32, not the current playerbase as a whole =P
Playercount low yeah because we console players can’t play shit 😂
متى بتنزل بلاستيشن 5
This game is a copy of Battlefield. What kind of value does this game give us?
Not being managed by EA is alread a huge value in this day and age.
If nothing else more maps and weapons.
Competition, make EA and DICE wake up and make better game
The game is free, No Pay to Win, and developers pay attention to the community suggestions.
@@Loxly-ti4sq Managed by a chinese company is pretty much the same value we get from EA.
The game has 32 vs 32.
yea but for the attack / defense gamemode we also need 32 vs 32 for conquest