@@xen_on9330 Ford used AC EML while Fujian used DC EML, Fujian used integrated mast while Ford used traditional mast, Fujian used a less angled landing runway, Fujian used 4 corner CIWS arrangement while Ford used traditional American arrangement… They just can’t be anymore different.
Seeing these comments, we Chinese are relieved. The aircraft carrier 003 is actually a big fishing boat that we made. It is used for fishing. There is no need for countries to worry about it.
All the american fanboys here Saying it will sink in a month or year Nobody knows what it can do until it has seen real combat Which i hope never comes U shouldnt underestimate youre potencial enemys See Russia with Ukraine Or The US with Vietnam
Not underestimating them, but in my opinion these carriers won’t reach their full combat potential until the later part of the decade. The carriers may be there but there’s not enough aircraft to fully man all of these carriers currently and even the J-15 has few issues still be ironed out with later variants and what comes from the FC-31 or whatever will be the base for the 5th gen carrier aircraft wouldn’t be any where near operational until the end of the decade also.
@@obj6989 You're taking the words of RUclips commentary, some of the dumbest people ever, and using that to form your analysis of the entire country AND our military? Yeah, no, keep going! I want to see how far you get with that line of thinking lol
Yes, but how seaworthy is it. Like a lot of their other ships, the construction may leave a lot left to be desired. Their steel isn't much chop, nor is their welding, so what happens when it encounters really heavy weather repeatedly. US Navy sailors were surprised when they went aboard Chinese ships when in the Persian Gulf. Brand new ships were a pile of rubbish...decks and walls that flexed when they touched them, poor welding, etc. Can't imagine this ship will be any better.
Some video says the research for the electrical integrated & propulsion system is 10yrs R&D. Likely with real implementation on 055 destroyers Implementation of 003 starts 2016, should have been build in 5 yrs but corvid. 2 yrs to put the parts together. The steam version CATOBAR was researched experiment for 20yrs! Works thought. But in the end China had better electrical version and production the maglev thus with her accumulated field knowledge, her EMALS performed and overcome many tech issues US Ford faces. Comparingly it made so much more sense to use EMALS instead of fruit of 20yrs experiment of steam powered CATOBAR China EMALS should be technically superior and shall work as intented from start, need to be verified in real continue applications though
For everybody in the comments who say shit like, it's a paper tiger, it's just target practice for the U.S. navy or somthing like that. What are they meant to do? Not build any kind of ships?
The Royal Navy deployed 2 battleships Prince of Wales and Repulse without fighter escorts to the East Coast of Malaya in 1945 and was promptly sunk by land based japanese torpedo planes . They were indeed target practice for japanese planes. So white men can be stupid too
The comment section is very impressive, and I hope the all the countries as well as their military intelligence agency should regard 003 as 'a bigger fishing boat' or even ignore the existance of this boat for good.
To any genuine Chinese commenters: I'm an Australian father. My young son a few minutes ago showed me some work he was doing at this government / public school. He was learning how to write / draw Chinese characters (words), and about Chinese history. They are taught to be respectful of all countries, especially those in our region. Even if both our governments may sometimes disagree, or behave like children themselves, we should both be aware that regular people (in Australia, China, India, UK, US) have more in common together than any small differences we may have. We should never allow our governments to bring us to war, or to fight, because it's not us who will pay the price, it will be our children. And nobody wants that. So stay cool, be positive, and always question anyone who wishes you to fight your friends, your neighbors. Thanks for reading, and take care.
Amen to that! Seeing your comment has literally given me more hope for peace and humanity. Our political differences aside, we're all ordinary Joes trying to make the best of what we've got. Given the opportunity, I'd absolutely love to visit and learn more about your wonderful country. Sending you and your family all the best from Beijing ;)
Amazing how they went from refurbishing an old Russian Kuznetsov class to building an 80000+ tonnes carrier with integrated electric propulsion(supposedly) and an Electromagnetic catapult system in just 10 years.
@@miketee4357 If you don't have skills, you would never build one anyway. And you have any proofs that they were stealing others' works or just bullshiting?
Who’s afraid? I guess China’s neighbors are so they are arming themselves, including Taiwan to deter Chinese aggression. They want American involvement in the region.
only china is afraid of china LOL the USA literally parked a destroyer on the ass of the type 002 doing flight ops during sea trails the captain and XO we siting in beach chairs feet up just watching
This video is wrong about the power system of the type 003 carrier, which is actually similar to that on Queen Eliz. In short, the power plant on 003 burns diesel to generate electricity. The ship, and all systems on it, is propelled by electricity.
Hehe. Well currently it's just 1 carrier. Main enemy it has is USS Ronald Reagan thats a Nimitz class. Though the US can always deploy 2 others to join it.
@@davidty2006 Fujan won’t be commissioned until 2025 at least, and the USS JFK (CVN-79) will be commissioned by 2024, so we’ll have two Ford class carriers by then.
Catching up is one hell of a stretch lol. China building new obsolete carriers that match US made ones made 70 years ago is something, but nowhere near a threat.
The problem with Chinese carriers is that they are based off the flawed Russian design of the admiral kuznetsov. Which has only had one combat deployment where things went relatively well. Next it takes decades to build the doctrine and support to make carriers viable not even mentioning repair and support facilities. This carrier will get 2-3 deploymenta out before things break with no viable fixing unless returning to port, which is a vicious cycle to be caught in. Russia has learned that the hard way and I expect china will learn the same lesson. I could go on but I've typed enough
@@sniperboom1202 this one isn't based on the Russian carriers. And it will be using EMALs to launch aircraft. The USA just started using it on the Ford class carriers. The Nimitz careers were using steam. So it is new territory for everyone. Am sure the Chinese wouldnt have built the ship without accounting for most of the things that could wrong
@@djjon1388 There is a difference between it will and it does. I think this launch is a show. The electromagnetic catapults are likely not complete yet and that means no planes are going to take off from the carrier for next 2 years at a minimum. So why launch this carrier?
@@djjon1388 except it is, it's an evolution of the Russian design with a Chinese flare and about 20k tones heavier. Disregarding that the rail launchers on U.S carriers only switched because R&D worked out the final bugs in the system. It doesn't mean it won't have issues or that something major couldn't break. The difference is U.S carriers have support facilities built SPECIFICALLY for the huge carriers. I could be wrong but last I checked Russia and China barely have any support systems for a ship over 55,000 tons in terms of war ship. Next china is notorious for over hyping their achievements to make it seem like there appear of the United States. They believe that they can operate carriers without the experience and accompanying support systems behind them shows how little you know on actual military systems and procedures.
One big mistake in this video is that the Type 003 carrier is using a completely different power and propulsion system than the 001 and 002 carrier. While 001 and 002 are using oil fired boilers to push steam turbines, the 003 is using the medium voltage direct current integrated power system to power the fully electric gearless propulsion system and the EMALS. Electric power is generated by two gas turbines and four diesel electric generators, and the generated energy is stored for distribution by the MVDC system. In these regards, the 003 is more advanced than the CVN Ford Class that is still using steam turbines and MVAC for the EMALS. Of course, the CVN Ford Class still enjoy some advantage of being nuclear powered, which means it can afford to be inefficient in terms of energy usage.
The gossips video I saw says 2x Large Diesels (modern) electric generators 5x LNG (modern) electric generators Other then that the all electrical system is correct In fact 055 destroyers are all eletric motor propulsion for certain... Not sure about the other types
It remains to be seen how well this ship and it's air complement will perform once commissioned. What is very clear however is that China has undoubtedly surpassed Russia in aircraft carrier development. Russia has never had a full deck super carrier.
One even more interesting thing to keep an eye on is what the carrier will actually be launching. Sure the Chinese surpassed Russian carrier development, but they are still using clones of the SU30 fighters for something that is supposed to be a "modern" carrier.
No, in fact, the United States, Russia, and India are the three most powerful countries in the world. China's weapons are probably only equivalent to the level of World War II.
Congratulations to the Chinese people! This is a mighty fine warship. Let this be the first of many more super carriers that will follow. ~ Best wishes from Singapore
Dont understimate China for fucks sake! I dont support the CCP, i dont agree with how they are running their country, and i dont like the way they treat the people inside of it, but people dont give them any sort of credit for what they've accomplished. They've gone from their 2 ski jump carriers to an EMALS Supercarrier. That is a very impressive jump. Chinese naval designers are cautious about what they put on their ships, the carrier will still likely initially have a run similar to that of the USS Ford, riddled with problems before they're fixed. We dont know anything about this carrier other than its launch system and its size spec sheet, and yet people are already calling it just a copy, and a re-write of America's "Old homework". Based on what? they way it looks? the way its gonna be operated?, every country makes designs that share things with each other because those things work, they're established. if that constitues as ripping other designs off, then everyone's been ripping off Britain since the 1910s with the HMS Argus, America included, and that sounds like a load of shit to everyone, doesnt it? We all know China makes a lot of cheap shit trash they sell, but whose the ones who enabled them to do that? us, the West. We're the ones who went "Gosh, these things sure are expensive to make here. I here that country China can make it very cheap, screw the quality, so long as it sells". This isnt indicative of their actual production and design capability, thinking that this *business tactic* is a credible way of measuring what they're able to do is like taking the bottom percent products in terms of quality from any western nation and going "Yup, thats all they're capable of". China skips corners in a lot of places it can afford to. But unlike Russia, it doesnt see the Armed Forces as a place where it can afford to skip all the corners it wants to. Buildings, bridges, construction work, sure, lets use cheap crap materials. But that mentality isnt exactly applicable to every part of Chinese manufacturing. Their leadership is very shrewd, and no doubt they'd probably be very happy to see themselves be as understimated as they are in these comments, they know they're likely going to face some kind of conflict in the near future, thats the whole point of their massive modernisation effort, and thinking they're not aware that cutting all corners would jeopardise that effort is dangerous. Any time in history one power underestimated another neer peer, it ended very badly for them.
The US still has all the cards when it comes to modern rank and file military tech, training, and soldiers. And, we've learned the hard way about counter-insurgency and guerilla warfare. Anything the Chinese have that can even begin to compare to western equivalents was 'developed' (not even starting with the piracy thing) within the last 25 years and most of it hasn't even entered service yet. The Chinese are currently making such a gigantic leap forward I just don't believe their system will be able to keep up with the evolution. And who are they going to turn to for help training up their military? Russia? I kinda hope so, that way Taiwan will immediately know what does and doesn't work to repel an invasion. Underestimating is the worst stance to take, yes, but they also stand alone in the world right now. Their cooperation with Russia is guaranteed to be either temporary or just as shaky as in the past. Putin is on his way out, he's having his last hurrah ruining the world economy and bullying his secret crush Zelenskyy before cancer or assassins or whatever finally kill the jackass. After which, the CCP will have no real allies aside from North Korea. Also, India is a thing. aNd ThEy'Re rIgHt bEhInD yOu, cHiNa~
@@lucasokeefe7935 Im gonna say im in agreement, breakneck speeds in terms of coming up with designs with no real experience. They are standing alone, with no one to turn to for help, beside a hermit backwater, and a rotting corpse of an empire to the north. I think they're aware of their predicament themselves, and as i said, they are fairly cautious in just slapping fancy tech on their stuff (at least the naval stuff), its probably their way of trying to be as prepared and ahead as they can. Of course we dont know if thats actually gonna help mitigate the issues they're gonna have in terms of experience and know-how. In the grand scheme of things they might as well have started operating carriers a week ago compared to other countries around the world, and now they have to try to operate a supercarrier. They've bitten off a gigantic sized bite, i guess we'll see how well they chew
Russian didn't have catapult-assisted take-off carrier, so it must be copied from U.S. Navy, oh wait! U.S. NAVY does not have Intermediate DC Link Voltage System yet, so this MUST be copied from U.S. from the future.🤣
how do you know that china doesn't release top secret information and if they do they are lying. i sure as shit know the USA or other countries doesn't. well sorry if you were a chinese tank commander who plays war thunder you do leak classified information.
I would rather keep an eye on the ever growing fleet of amphibious assault ships. Why? Because the only piece of ground you really control is the part you are standing on.
Anyone who Question Chinese shipbuilding quality. Reminder that the New Newport Shipyards are made of imported Chinese shipbuilding equipment. US Carriers are Made in China by proxy.
China's aircraft carrier 003 is indeed not an aircraft carrier. In fact, it is a maritime planting ship. The j-20 is also a pesticide aircraft. China's goal is to develop agriculture and become the world's largest grain producer and grain storage. We only develop agriculture and never involve military affairs
When you have a nuclear bomb, you are the axis of terror; When you have 10 nuclear bombs, you are a destabilizing factor in the region. When you have 100 nuclear bombs, you are an important force for regional stability. When you have 500 nuclear bombs, you are a major player in the international order. When you have more than 2,000 nuclear bombs, you are the cornerstone of global peace and stability.
I served on a US Navy deep ocean aircraft carrier 60 years ago. Aircraft carriers are complex systems, even before you add in carrier groups (airplanes). China has been pretty good at building things - some better than others. But it takes a deep understanding of training, joint operations and logistics to operate an aircraft carrier group. Building ships is, in many respects, the easiest part. Conduct deep ocean flight, refueling, reprovisioning operations while guarding against submarine, surface and air threats - as the US Navy has for about a century - and then we can talk about what is "sour grapes" and what is simply an acknowledgment of the vast lead the US Navy has in this area.
I'm loving the comments. Hur dur big target. You do realize the US has at least 11 of those large targets. Also this just shows china is actually capable of building something this large. I'm not pro china by any means but this just shows that they can build something that will be a real threat.
No snarky comments here, just some real observations. First off it’s an oil burner, not nuclear powered which has several impacts. The biggest being it’s range of operations. Certainly it will have its own oilers and resupply ships, but those come with the inherent vulnerability of being lost. Also fuel storage foe its own engines means less storage for its aircraft and munitions. An additional factor is that it will be using electromagnetic catapults and recovery systems which will require significant amount of power will be supplied by its own generators. Again fuel storage. Then there’s it’s aircraft of which China’s only carrier fighter jet is the woefully underpowered, heavy and problem riddled J-15. It’s uncertain how the J-15 will perform using a catapult launch system if it can even use or be reconfigured for such. If so that may even improve it performance as the J-15 cannot take off from their current carriers with a full fuel and weapons load out which limits it capabilities. The J-31 is in development but it’s uncertain how it will perform or when it will be available for service. Of course there’s always the headaches of breaking in new systems and training. It will be interesting to see how it’s deployed and wether it will stray very far from China’s shores. I’m not sure it will ever make a world tour or even show up off the coast of Africa. It will have to have its own fleet of ships for protection and supply so that’s also a limiting factor. All that said, I don’t see the Fujian ever going head to head with an American aircraft carrier battle group. The locals, sure. But, not bad for their first, modern carrier. Be something to keep one’s eyes on.
You’ve got to remember the first thing China loses of it goes to war is it’s fuel supply. They are a net importer of oil. Also, The F35 does not have significant problems any more. Yes there are small issues still but the integrated systems America has that link all aspects of their military is unmatched.
@@墙里小粉红 *The operators of Ford Class stated "the cloth hanger antenna design" is like a sail can catch more wind under the sun 👍 save energy in the long term* *You just to happen to see it before the Ford Class antenna copied 003 antenna ... just like DDG (X) copied from 055, RUclips copied from TikTok, iPhone camera copied from Huawei and so on ...*
The electric magnatic caltpults on Chinese carrier is powered by newly developed Intermediate DC Link Voltage System, which is more stable and controllable than AC Voltage System installed in US Ford carrier.
@@kasilva7716 there is no source the Chinese wouldn't leak actual specs for the ship is top secret just like the top speed of a Nimitz class carrier is classified but i can say its the fastest huge sea going ship in the world or was since the Ford entered service.
All the Americans in the comment section shitting about China wasting money on a new advanced aircraft carrier while their own government has 11 with 3 more on the way without giving a shit about kids getting shot in schools, sky high medical bills, and high levels of food insecurity and homelessness is just (*chef’s kiss) hilarious.
Although the 003 carrier is conventionally powered, the electromagnetic catapult uses a medium-voltage DC all-electric system, which is more efficient than the American Ford class AC catapult. The 004 will be nuclear powered and electromagnetic catapulted. In addition, j-35 heavy stealth fighter jets, air Police 600 carrier-borne early warning aircraft and carrier-borne unmanned aerial systems are still being tested.
Yes and no. Many people are not a fan of the CCP and their oppressive government (which is Of course disproportionately oppressive to different ethnic groups such as the Uyghur Muslims. But China as a country shouldn’t be hated, just the government.
Well, you see china is a potential adversary for multiple countries because china is so great at making friends with it's neighbors. Some of those neighbors have defense treaty with the US.
These haters just cant accept the fact that China is rivalling US in the sea. The Chinese electro rails tech leapfrogged the US about 10 years ahead according to one of the chines e scientist involved in this project. Must have been a breakthrough research.
"There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent" 老子 - (Lao Tzu/Old Master) - 4th century BCE In 2021 the People's Liberation Army Navy (Chinese Navy) has commissioned at least eight Guided Missile Destroyers (DDG), two amphibious assault ships (LHD) and one nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN). Better take this seriously.
China’s industrial infrastructure can easily build aircraft carriers nearly as big as US carriers. The issue is the operational effectiveness of their carriers. Building one is only half the battle. Having the experience to project carrier power is another. Even the Brits had to learn carrier operations from the US Marine aviation.
China will eventually learn to operate effectively, it is just a matter of time. In less than 50 years, China will sailing the seven seas with at least 15 carriers and some spares to protect South China Seas
@@michaele4830 And the U.S will only need one to take out all of them. If they even use it. They might just use any of the other oodles of crazy bullshit in the armory.
@@michaele4830 How is that going to happen, precisely? Given that China has no militarily capable Allies nor any previous experience or a battleground from which it could take such said experience?
@@bloodfiredrake7259 Allies haven't been made since the end the second world war. And you don't just need any Allies, as China has now Allies too, one of which is the United States, however unwilling to share its vast military expertise with China. China is solely lacking in militarily capable Allies. Russia is a poor example, and no other country has nearly as vast of an experience in warfare as the United States. Are you going to say that there will be others? Which others? How is that going to happen? Believing into a fantastical reality is all fine with me, live in a world of fairy tales if you wish. I asked for examples wishing for a prosperous debate, but I get dubious fanboys looking to worship China and a "new world order". Relax in your chairs, reality isn't a video game and it often times isn't as simple as you think or would love to believe.
Brainwashed by the media since childhood, some people have never been to China 🤣🤣🤣 Western brainwashing can turn normal people into idiots without independent thinking
Man I dunno. I've been a Binkov fan for years but lately his comment sections have been filled with extremley stupid comments. Perhaps a recent influx of viewers who don't know military history/concepts?
In fact, the vast majority of Chinese people have a tendency to reject homosexuality. Homosexual groups are not popular in China from the official to the people, and they have no economic or cultural foundation in China.😂
UNFORTUNATELY, IT CAN'T RESCUE THOSE TRAFFICKED WOMAN SUFFERING IN ISOLATED POOR VILLAGES IN DONGJI VILLAGE IN JIANGSU PROVINCE OF YOUR COMMUNIST CHINA !
It’s an objective FACT that Chinese carriers are far inferior than American ones. Because they are decades behind in development. Adding to that is the lack of experience the Chinese navy has. Numbers don’t account for much.
I'd say Chinese type 003 super aircraft carrier is the most formidable warship ever built outside the US,desipte of being coventionally powered,it has the most advanced DC powerd electromagnetic catapult techenology which is even more reliable than what they are currently using on Ford Class(AC powered).Type 003 should officially enters sevice by 2025, 3 years later from now,when we'd see yet another larger type 004 launching ceremony.
For a country that had its first aircraft carrier in 2012, people always compare China to the United States, and I think that's enough to make China proud, and if you believe it's just a big fishing boat, it's even better
LOL keep dreaming the ford class carrier Gerald ford is in service china's probably got 6 years before it does and i say probably 6+ years since they have no one actually experienced to teach them.
Getting EMALS only 6 yrs after they debut on the Ford is very fast. What impresses is the sheer speed of iteration. And to the idiots who keep harping on the copy aspect, you can get the recipe but actually cooking the dish requires a lot more than just copying.
The real interesting part will happen when she puts out to sea. What kind of other vessels will escort her? What armaments will those vessels carry? How far out from China will the entire carrier group travel? In other words, will the carrier group approach the American, European, Australian or Indian coastlines? That's when things will get interesting.
003 aircraft carrier just be used to protect China's territorial sea,instead of invading other countries, but several countries are used to bullying others. When others become strong, they will feel afraid because of their guilt and fear that they will be retaliated. There is an old Chinese saying: spend the belly of a gentleman with the heart of a villain. Perhaps this is the most vivid interpretation.
@@ziyunzhang7317 then stay away from the ROC(which is the only true china), the Philippines and other nations of the SCS. the paper tiger needs to take note of the paper bear currently getting its ass pushed in Ukraine. There's and old American saying speak softly and carry a big effing stick. china and Russia love to parade around they're new "high tech" weapons that probably don't work well. the USA doesn't hell the really really good shit people never seen before since the last wars weren't fought against near peers. the fact we will put a destroyer right on the ass of the newest operational carrier doing sea trails speaks a lot.
@@ziyunzhang7317 also the fact we use the F117 to test our air defenses against stealth shows the F117 is still stealthier than anything china and Russia currently has and that was developed in the 70's
@@codyspencer9798 No, this means that you cannot get latest stealth aircrafts from China or Russia and could use only your own obsolete tech hoping that it's comparable to ours.
@@PersonaSimon Because they can 'determine' the combat capability of a warship without seeing her in action They always say Chinese stuff will break apart immediately, but Liaoning, commissioned in 2012, is still working perfectly fine after ten years.
Regardless of the new toy, the Chinese Navy needs to get up to speed on tactical usage. The US and Britain has several decades to work out the 'bugs' in thier carrier strike forces and honed their skills. It's just a matter of time before China can really compete militarily...they are desperately working on it.
Aircraft carriers are built to project power. Wether or not it's as functional as another carrier, is irrelevant to that premise. The fact that they made this investment in resources is what is important here. Do not foolishly underestimate their commitment.
@@7521eric well, nothing in the world stays the same. Just like the British colonized the world and now the US is the only superpower, or just like no one believed China could be the world’s second largest economy several decades ago, but time will give answers. Keep believing what we believe and then just wait.
It comes down to the training and naval doctrine. Unfortunately they don’t have much experience in this, as well as power projection. Only time will tell if the Chinese military can pull it off. You can build all you want, but if you don’t have the means to proficiently train and operate these systems at full scale, it’s kinda pointless.
Same BS over and over again. Remember back in 2001 when they predicted that it would take China "decades" to become part of the world market, let along a competitive player? In reality,20 years later China is the biggest trade partner to 2/3 of the countries in the world.
I’m surprised the Chinese built a flat top carrier before proving they mastered EMLS. Or making sure that conventional powered carrier would generate enough EMLS sorties. The Americans are still having problems with their EMLS even now. EMLS delayed the Gerald Ford by nearly 5 years. The Fujian will be the first CATOBAR carrier to be conventionally powered in the world too. Time will tell. At least if the US had totally failed with EMLS they would have reverted back to steam. The Chinese have nothing to revert too.
The Geralf R Ford is now fully operational with its EMLS and will deploy to service later this year. The John F Kennedy will probably be deployed to active service in 2024 or 2025 so the US has solved EMLS now.
@@tylerclayton6081 Thanks for the correction I had recently read somewhere that the cycles or launches between failures were still not satisfactory. Thanks Cheers
Lol the American and Chinese war hawks in here are too funny. There won't be a war, none of us will survive. Not you, not your families. So go out and get a job and make some friends instead.
And while America and China claim on each other all the way, they are still their biggest partner in every other non military area. I’d rather believe these 2 giant countries are just making a staged play to treat all the rest counties be their pet.
Nice to see Chinese navy wants to challenge US navy , this is a very good thing to have power balance , only with power balance the world can be more peaceful and less manipulated by one superpower
![Diggy Graves - Red Vineyard [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Ro085T0mnQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Yeah, that’s an impressive ship gotta say. It’s a matter of training and developing doctrine once it’s commissioned.
An impressive copy, you mean
@@xen_on9330 copy which one?
@@achillesz7258USS Gerald R Ford, with the EMALS and the literal exact shape lol.
It'll be an impressive reef
@@xen_on9330 Ford used AC EML while Fujian used DC EML, Fujian used integrated mast while Ford used traditional mast, Fujian used a less angled landing runway, Fujian used 4 corner CIWS arrangement while Ford used traditional American arrangement…
They just can’t be anymore different.
Seeing these comments, we Chinese are relieved. The aircraft carrier 003 is actually a big fishing boat that we made. It is used for fishing. There is no need for countries to worry about it.
Is this sarcasm?
@@angrydragon4574 not really, China wish the other countries to underestimate it a lot of the time
@@stefano9493 You a wumao?
@@angrydragon4574 ofcourse because China already has better weapons and higher technology than us according to the Pentagon!
@@angrydragon4574You look in the comments section and see how many people say the ship is rubbish. They can't all be wumao.
I like how everytime this guy makes a video about china, everyone's IQ suddenly drops below room temperature.
hahah
What? Did you see the comments when he makes video about Russia? Comments here are nothing on that. + Communist China deserve those comments.
Certain group only. They are also pretty dumb to begin with.
fear of being replace and remove
Lol
As a matter of fact, this ship is used for fishing and will carry passengers as a cruise ship in its spare time
This fishing boat can revive China's economy during the epidemic
@@众星弧光 Chinese？我是中國人，戰略忽悠局的
@@Asa-kc2co 下次不要打出来，就写个忽 大家大家就明白了
So the warship is actually a peaceship.
All the american fanboys here
Saying it will sink in a month or year
Nobody knows what it can do until it has seen real combat
Which i hope never comes
U shouldnt underestimate youre potencial enemys
See Russia with Ukraine
Or The US with Vietnam
Not underestimating them, but in my opinion these carriers won’t reach their full combat potential until the later part of the decade. The carriers may be there but there’s not enough aircraft to fully man all of these carriers currently and even the J-15 has few issues still be ironed out with later variants and what comes from the FC-31 or whatever will be the base for the 5th gen carrier aircraft wouldn’t be any where near operational until the end of the decade also.
Nah, that's exactly what we wanted them to be.
An arrogant enemy is a good enemy.
@@obj6989 lol not nuclear powered, just another big target, along with its resupply ships. Take those out and it’s just a gas-guzzling sitting duck
@@abba-Flammenfresser yup I totally agree. You should post it and get 10000 upvote. Thanks.
@@obj6989
You're taking the words of RUclips commentary, some of the dumbest people ever, and using that to form your analysis of the entire country AND our military? Yeah, no, keep going! I want to see how far you get with that line of thinking lol
I don’t think anyone else can make such piece in two years, have to say this is impressive
Yes, but how seaworthy is it. Like a lot of their other ships, the construction may leave a lot left to be desired. Their steel isn't much chop, nor is their welding, so what happens when it encounters really heavy weather repeatedly. US Navy sailors were surprised when they went aboard Chinese ships when in the Persian Gulf. Brand new ships were a pile of rubbish...decks and walls that flexed when they touched them, poor welding, etc. Can't imagine this ship will be any better.
You know what happens when China builds fast..right?
Some video says the research for the electrical integrated & propulsion system is 10yrs R&D.
Likely with real implementation on 055 destroyers
Implementation of 003 starts 2016, should have been build in 5 yrs but corvid.
2 yrs to put the parts together.
The steam version CATOBAR was researched experiment for 20yrs! Works thought.
But in the end China had better electrical version and production the maglev thus with her accumulated field knowledge, her EMALS performed and overcome many tech issues US Ford faces.
Comparingly it made so much more sense to use EMALS instead of fruit of 20yrs experiment of steam powered CATOBAR
China EMALS should be technically superior and shall work as intented from start, need to be verified in real continue applications though
not 2 years, they started building in 2015 or 2016
@@carltanner9065 I read about US vessels getting caught fire and rusting ,not chinese, but whatever makes u happy with ypour fantasy stories
For everybody in the comments who say shit like, it's a paper tiger, it's just target practice for the U.S. navy or somthing like that. What are they meant to do? Not build any kind of ships?
The Royal Navy deployed 2 battleships Prince of Wales and Repulse without fighter escorts to the East Coast of Malaya in 1945 and was promptly sunk by land based japanese torpedo planes . They were indeed target practice for japanese planes.
So white men can be stupid too
NO , THEY BUILD ANTI AIRCRAFT CARRIER MISSILE !
@@cyruskilroy9733 that's never hit a moving target......... LMAO
@@codyspencer9798 ONLY YOUR XI JINPING WILL BELIEVE YOU !
The comment section is very impressive, and I hope the all the countries as well as their military intelligence agency should regard 003 as 'a bigger fishing boat' or even ignore the existance of this boat for good.
I agree with your opinion.
Yes indeed, it’s just a huge commercial fishing vessel that focuses on fishing.
It's a coping mechanism. The "denial" stage in the five stages of grief.
This is just China’s new community fishing boats. Nothing to be worrying about! 😉
啊对对对
@@曾钰清-w1h 😂😂😂😂😂
@Danyang Liu 懂的
战忽水平太低了，扣工资
阿对对对，你看有人信吗
To any genuine Chinese commenters: I'm an Australian father. My young son a few minutes ago showed me some work he was doing at this government / public school. He was learning how to write / draw Chinese characters (words), and about Chinese history. They are taught to be respectful of all countries, especially those in our region. Even if both our governments may sometimes disagree, or behave like children themselves, we should both be aware that regular people (in Australia, China, India, UK, US) have more in common together than any small differences we may have. We should never allow our governments to bring us to war, or to fight, because it's not us who will pay the price, it will be our children. And nobody wants that. So stay cool, be positive, and always question anyone who wishes you to fight your friends, your neighbors. Thanks for reading, and take care.
Thanks you so much 🥰
Agree. Best wishes to you. love from China🇨🇳
Greetings from Taiwan, province of China.😉
... The Chinese government tells the people what to do, not the other way around mate
Amen to that! Seeing your comment has literally given me more hope for peace and humanity. Our political differences aside, we're all ordinary Joes trying to make the best of what we've got. Given the opportunity, I'd absolutely love to visit and learn more about your wonderful country. Sending you and your family all the best from Beijing ;)
Amazing how they went from refurbishing an old Russian Kuznetsov class to building an 80000+ tonnes carrier with integrated electric propulsion(supposedly) and an Electromagnetic catapult system in just 10 years.
Amazing what you can accomplish by stealing others' work.
@@miketee4357 usa then so dumb that they let china stole their tech that easy
This is what they do best... Theft of intellectual property
@@miketee4357 If you don't have skills, you would never build one anyway. And you have any proofs that they were stealing others' works or just bullshiting?
@@miketee4357 Sourpuss spotted talking through his arse.
It's funny how people underestimate China but are afraid!!!
Who’s afraid? I guess China’s neighbors are so they are arming themselves, including Taiwan to deter Chinese aggression. They want American involvement in the region.
Don't worry, this is a large fishing boat, which has no fighting power.
only china is afraid of china LOL the USA literally parked a destroyer on the ass of the type 002 doing flight ops during sea trails the captain and XO we siting in beach chairs feet up just watching
Former colony nations, home to 80 percent of the world's population, are not afraid.
This video is wrong about the power system of the type 003 carrier, which is actually similar to that on Queen Eliz. In short, the power plant on 003 burns diesel to generate electricity. The ship, and all systems on it, is propelled by electricity.
You are correct.
Now Suddenly all of them will become 5 star Generals and military experts.
they used the coupon code from ads of warpath 20% katysha rocket launchers and maus tanks
Don't worry, Indians and Americans can win the war in the comment section with their "made in china" stereotypes lol
Nah America wins with the Ford class
Hehe.
Well currently it's just 1 carrier.
Main enemy it has is USS Ronald Reagan thats a Nimitz class.
Though the US can always deploy 2 others to join it.
@@davidty2006 Fujan won’t be commissioned until 2025 at least, and the USS JFK (CVN-79) will be commissioned by 2024, so we’ll have two Ford class carriers by then.
Actually not Indians, mostly Koreans and Japanese.
Atleast our warships have seen combat
It's just a fishing boat. There's nothing to worry about
hmmmmmmmmmmm finally some good chinese person
@@anphatcompany6545 gooooooooooood
Americans are mad cause people are catching up. Their ships are being retired and china out here building ships like crazy
Catching up is one hell of a stretch lol. China building new obsolete carriers that match US made ones made 70 years ago is something, but nowhere near a threat.
The problem with Chinese carriers is that they are based off the flawed Russian design of the admiral kuznetsov. Which has only had one combat deployment where things went relatively well. Next it takes decades to build the doctrine and support to make carriers viable not even mentioning repair and support facilities. This carrier will get 2-3 deploymenta out before things break with no viable fixing unless returning to port, which is a vicious cycle to be caught in. Russia has learned that the hard way and I expect china will learn the same lesson. I could go on but I've typed enough
@@sniperboom1202 this one isn't based on the Russian carriers. And it will be using EMALs to launch aircraft. The USA just started using it on the Ford class carriers. The Nimitz careers were using steam. So it is new territory for everyone. Am sure the Chinese wouldnt have built the ship without accounting for most of the things that could wrong
@@djjon1388 There is a difference between it will and it does. I think this launch is a show. The electromagnetic catapults are likely not complete yet and that means no planes are going to take off from the carrier for next 2 years at a minimum. So why launch this carrier?
@@djjon1388 except it is, it's an evolution of the Russian design with a Chinese flare and about 20k tones heavier. Disregarding that the rail launchers on U.S carriers only switched because R&D worked out the final bugs in the system. It doesn't mean it won't have issues or that something major couldn't break. The difference is U.S carriers have support facilities built SPECIFICALLY for the huge carriers. I could be wrong but last I checked Russia and China barely have any support systems for a ship over 55,000 tons in terms of war ship. Next china is notorious for over hyping their achievements to make it seem like there appear of the United States. They believe that they can operate carriers without the experience and accompanying support systems behind them shows how little you know on actual military systems and procedures.
Lovem or hatem, you have to admit that this is an impressive engineering feat.
THAT'S WHY MANY F0RE!GNERS S0 DESPERATE W!TH CH!NA ACH!EVEMENT!!! ; )
@@haikaloronsentnel138 The primary language of chinese vassal states is not English suffice to say.
@@Theguyinthefez yes English is evidently a language in decline.
Chinese junk
@@Theguyinthefez English isn't even your official language, amerimutt. Let us know when you're done with trying to spite the Anglo.
Not just the biggest carrier they made, it's the largest warship they've ever made.
Largest warship outside the US.
Keep coping! It's just an empty container full of 🐶🥩
@@OnlySubhumansWorkAtRUclips 😅
@@OnlySubhumansWorkAtRUclips you can't even spell "copying". If you really don't like the piece of art please leave.
@@Absolut531kmh OMG! 🤣🤣🤣 you're so innocent... Don't forget to put a cage around genius...🤣🤣🤣
@@OnlySubhumansWorkAtRUclips lmao
As chinese, i am very proud of our 003 large fishing boat, it can hold most fish in the world
Yes, the fish can deliver more fish to enemies forces.
是的，人民都快吃不上饭了 所以建一艘大点渔船出海打鱼。
同志们好
In fact, such large aircraft carriers are all made of wood. They have no combat effectiveness and are all made of cardboard
🤣我想是的，003的出现为我国捕鱼业的发展迈出了关键的一步
One big mistake in this video is that the Type 003 carrier is using a completely different power and propulsion system than the 001 and 002 carrier. While 001 and 002 are using oil fired boilers to push steam turbines, the 003 is using the medium voltage direct current integrated power system to power the fully electric gearless propulsion system and the EMALS. Electric power is generated by two gas turbines and four diesel electric generators, and the generated energy is stored for distribution by the MVDC system. In these regards, the 003 is more advanced than the CVN Ford Class that is still using steam turbines and MVAC for the EMALS. Of course, the CVN Ford Class still enjoy some advantage of being nuclear powered, which means it can afford to be inefficient in terms of energy usage.
lol. lmao
Then what's your point?
@@pedrobodean3179 did you miss the first sentence?
@@pedrobodean3179 I was just correcting some misinformation.
The gossips video I saw says
2x Large Diesels (modern) electric generators
5x LNG (modern) electric generators
Other then that the all electrical system is correct
In fact 055 destroyers are all eletric motor propulsion for certain... Not sure about the other types
It remains to be seen how well this ship and it's air complement will perform once commissioned. What is very clear however is that China has undoubtedly surpassed Russia in aircraft carrier development. Russia has never had a full deck super carrier.
One even more interesting thing to keep an eye on is what the carrier will actually be launching. Sure the Chinese surpassed Russian carrier development, but they are still using clones of the SU30 fighters for something that is supposed to be a "modern" carrier.
Russia dont have the budget
Maybe the FC 35?
No, in fact, the United States, Russia, and India are the three most powerful countries in the world. China's weapons are probably only equivalent to the level of World War II.
@@fish_activity 兄弟，你是对的
Next stop: conduct a freedom of navigation along the US coast.
If their scrap ships make it that far, go ahead🤣🤣🤣
Brother, China is a conservative country, they follow the principle of "you don't offend me, I don't offend others".
This is not an aircraft carrier, this is "sea farmland", and the two strips on the deck are vegetable greenhouses.
中国自古以来就是一个农耕文明，所以这艘航母造出来没有别的目的，只是为了更好地种地，以满足国内对粮食的需求。
Congratulations to the Chinese people! This is a mighty fine warship. Let this be the first of many more super carriers that will follow. ~ Best wishes from Singapore
Thanks，bro
Dont understimate China for fucks sake!
I dont support the CCP, i dont agree with how they are running their country, and i dont like the way they treat the people inside of it, but people dont give them any sort of credit for what they've accomplished. They've gone from their 2 ski jump carriers to an EMALS Supercarrier. That is a very impressive jump. Chinese naval designers are cautious about what they put on their ships, the carrier will still likely initially have a run similar to that of the USS Ford, riddled with problems before they're fixed. We dont know anything about this carrier other than its launch system and its size spec sheet, and yet people are already calling it just a copy, and a re-write of America's "Old homework". Based on what? they way it looks? the way its gonna be operated?, every country makes designs that share things with each other because those things work, they're established. if that constitues as ripping other designs off, then everyone's been ripping off Britain since the 1910s with the HMS Argus, America included, and that sounds like a load of shit to everyone, doesnt it?
We all know China makes a lot of cheap shit trash they sell, but whose the ones who enabled them to do that? us, the West. We're the ones who went "Gosh, these things sure are expensive to make here. I here that country China can make it very cheap, screw the quality, so long as it sells". This isnt indicative of their actual production and design capability, thinking that this *business tactic* is a credible way of measuring what they're able to do is like taking the bottom percent products in terms of quality from any western nation and going "Yup, thats all they're capable of".
China skips corners in a lot of places it can afford to. But unlike Russia, it doesnt see the Armed Forces as a place where it can afford to skip all the corners it wants to. Buildings, bridges, construction work, sure, lets use cheap crap materials. But that mentality isnt exactly applicable to every part of Chinese manufacturing. Their leadership is very shrewd, and no doubt they'd probably be very happy to see themselves be as understimated as they are in these comments, they know they're likely going to face some kind of conflict in the near future, thats the whole point of their massive modernisation effort, and thinking they're not aware that cutting all corners would jeopardise that effort is dangerous.
Any time in history one power underestimated another neer peer, it ended very badly for them.
Good comments, but you know too much 😄🙃🙃
Yes they have 1.4 billion people and they want the same things as people in the USA or the EU. Their economy will continue to grow.
I'm beginning to the half the comments of people dismissing them are Chinese trolls myself. Good write-up.
The US still has all the cards when it comes to modern rank and file military tech, training, and soldiers. And, we've learned the hard way about counter-insurgency and guerilla warfare. Anything the Chinese have that can even begin to compare to western equivalents was 'developed' (not even starting with the piracy thing) within the last 25 years and most of it hasn't even entered service yet.
The Chinese are currently making such a gigantic leap forward I just don't believe their system will be able to keep up with the evolution. And who are they going to turn to for help training up their military? Russia? I kinda hope so, that way Taiwan will immediately know what does and doesn't work to repel an invasion.
Underestimating is the worst stance to take, yes, but they also stand alone in the world right now. Their cooperation with Russia is guaranteed to be either temporary or just as shaky as in the past. Putin is on his way out, he's having his last hurrah ruining the world economy and bullying his secret crush Zelenskyy before cancer or assassins or whatever finally kill the jackass. After which, the CCP will have no real allies aside from North Korea.
Also, India is a thing. aNd ThEy'Re rIgHt bEhInD yOu, cHiNa~
@@lucasokeefe7935 Im gonna say im in agreement, breakneck speeds in terms of coming up with designs with no real experience. They are standing alone, with no one to turn to for help, beside a hermit backwater, and a rotting corpse of an empire to the north. I think they're aware of their predicament themselves, and as i said, they are fairly cautious in just slapping fancy tech on their stuff (at least the naval stuff), its probably their way of trying to be as prepared and ahead as they can. Of course we dont know if thats actually gonna help mitigate the issues they're gonna have in terms of experience and know-how. In the grand scheme of things they might as well have started operating carriers a week ago compared to other countries around the world, and now they have to try to operate a supercarrier. They've bitten off a gigantic sized bite, i guess we'll see how well they chew
这只是渔船，甲板上的工棚是为了防止鱼打上来晒坏掉。
It's just a fishing boat, and the shed on the deck is meant to prevent the fish from coming up and drying up
笑死
yes it's true
笑得
It's true
Russian didn't have catapult-assisted take-off carrier, so it must be copied from U.S. Navy, oh wait! U.S. NAVY does not have Intermediate DC Link Voltage System yet, so this MUST be copied from U.S. from the future.🤣
no joke. there's serious article stated that China "mimics the expected future composition of the U.S."
yeah, we got their powerpoint :)
Wrong, it was the Chinese who sneaked into space and stole it from aliens.
how do you know that china doesn't release top secret information and if they do they are lying. i sure as shit know the USA or other countries doesn't. well sorry if you were a chinese tank commander who plays war thunder you do leak classified information.
Bro i feel like I lost 10 iq just by reading these Chinese haters comments and the conspiracy theories they made lol
Sleepy Joe？
haha
Oh no my brain cells are disappearing just like my social credits
This is just a large Chinese fishing boat
战忽局
Bro modern warships is bad game and boring
In us radar? Yes
@@cap_2190 how?
Yup, confirmed, it's just a large fishing boat and we steal America Electric catapult system which America kept failing 👍👍👍
I would rather keep an eye on the ever growing fleet of amphibious assault ships. Why? Because the only piece of ground you really control is the part you are standing on.
well, carriers are actually the meter rule of naval assets. but i agree, the amphibious assoult ships are commonly very underrestimated.
I just feel like to watch amphibious tanks landing scene on TV, it is so weired but brings about a feeling of ultimately supremacy.
Anyone who Question Chinese shipbuilding quality. Reminder that the New Newport Shipyards are made of imported Chinese shipbuilding equipment. US Carriers are Made in China by proxy.
China's aircraft carrier 003 is indeed not an aircraft carrier. In fact, it is a maritime planting ship. The j-20 is also a pesticide aircraft. China's goal is to develop agriculture and become the world's largest grain producer and grain storage. We only develop agriculture and never involve military affairs
@小蚂蚁的电话虫我也 他说的没错啊，我们最在行的就是种菜，无非挑战一下海上移动种菜，毕竟赤道附近阳光更充足~
When you have a nuclear bomb, you are the axis of terror; When you have 10 nuclear bombs, you are a destabilizing factor in the region. When you have 100 nuclear bombs, you are an important force for regional stability. When you have 500 nuclear bombs, you are a major player in the international order. When you have more than 2,000 nuclear bombs, you are the cornerstone of global peace and stability.
你这家伙，是我看到最好的评论，所以美国成为了世界警察
@@one-piece1987
Well, the UN and NATO are.
@@one-piece1987 Russia is destabilizing it's region and it's the country with the most nuclear weapons in the world
@@dani.zambomagno The world will isolate him because of this, and he will feel inferior without friends.
@@MostlyPennyCat un is a joke
lovely to see so many sour grapes here!you all made my day!:)
I served on a US Navy deep ocean aircraft carrier 60 years ago. Aircraft carriers are complex systems, even before you add in carrier groups (airplanes). China has been pretty good at building things - some better than others. But it takes a deep understanding of training, joint operations and logistics to operate an aircraft carrier group. Building ships is, in many respects, the easiest part. Conduct deep ocean flight, refueling, reprovisioning operations while guarding against submarine, surface and air threats - as the US Navy has for about a century - and then we can talk about what is "sour grapes" and what is simply an acknowledgment of the vast lead the US Navy has in this area.
@@michaelkelcy9669 They got to start somewhere right
@@michaelkelcy9669 Didn't the US tell you that the Chinese are very quick learners? They (the world) don't called them Chinese speed for nothing.
@@michaelkelcy9669 Don't forget, China only has 10 years of experience in aircraft carriers, we will never stop
大渔船而已，阿三们接着奏乐接着舞，维克兰特号世界第一🇮🇳👍
true
That's right, brother.
Wow I'm sure the comment section would be filled with open minded people who would have civil discussion about China and the US!
In case it doesn't stay civil, do you have a local peacekeeper in mind with a blue helmet?
@@reubensandwich9249 they don't need blue helmets, having American flag on their uniforms is enough
@@thenasiudk1337 You just demoed the typical logic of a mob. Thanks.
If china stops claiming things then we can have a civil discussion
@@Delta-2-0No one's talking to dog. Sit down.
It's one thing to launch.
Actual operation and maintenance is the real world.
And still another to perform effectively in a combat situation...was Top Gun their training material?
Who is that on your profile pic?
@@JemRau ho chi men.
@@codyspencer9798 I mean Le Peejon’s pic
I'm so happy that some people are so arrogant.
I'm loving the comments. Hur dur big target. You do realize the US has at least 11 of those large targets. Also this just shows china is actually capable of building something this large. I'm not pro china by any means but this just shows that they can build something that will be a real threat.
看到好多人只能口嗨但是什么都做不了，哈哈哈我好开心
No snarky comments here, just some real observations.
First off it’s an oil burner, not nuclear powered which has several impacts. The biggest being it’s range of operations. Certainly it will have its own oilers and resupply ships, but those come with the inherent vulnerability of being lost. Also fuel storage foe its own engines means less storage for its aircraft and munitions. An additional factor is that it will be using electromagnetic catapults and recovery systems which will require significant amount of power will be supplied by its own generators. Again fuel storage.
Then there’s it’s aircraft of which China’s only carrier fighter jet is the woefully underpowered, heavy and problem riddled J-15. It’s uncertain how the J-15 will perform using a catapult launch system if it can even use or be reconfigured for such. If so that may even improve it performance as the J-15 cannot take off from their current carriers with a full fuel and weapons load out which limits it capabilities. The J-31 is in development but it’s uncertain how it will perform or when it will be available for service.
Of course there’s always the headaches of breaking in new systems and training. It will be interesting to see how it’s deployed and wether it will stray very far from China’s shores. I’m not sure it will ever make a world tour or even show up off the coast of Africa. It will have to have its own fleet of ships for protection and supply so that’s also a limiting factor. All that said, I don’t see the Fujian ever going head to head with an American aircraft carrier battle group. The locals, sure. But, not bad for their first, modern carrier. Be something to keep one’s eyes on.
f35 is still problem riddled
We don't plan to go to Africa with our military forces. We are good friends with them.
You’ve got to remember the first thing China loses of it goes to war is it’s fuel supply.
They are a net importer of oil. Also, The F35 does not have significant problems any more. Yes there are small issues still but the integrated systems America has that link all aspects of their military is unmatched.
The Chinese Navy and Military in general have NO real world combat experience eather..
@@danekender5332 and we are happy to keep it that way.
我是中国人，我证明这个航母只是根据一个商业渔船改装来的，没有什么作战能力
谁说没能力？它不是可以打鱼吗？
ni shi hei gui
你说你是中国人，我也是。
用说的我也会😀
@@AKun07 我是你爸爸
@@墙里小粉红 *The operators of Ford Class stated "the cloth hanger antenna design" is like a sail can catch more wind under the sun 👍 save energy in the long term*
*You just to happen to see it before the Ford Class antenna copied 003 antenna ... just like DDG (X) copied from 055, RUclips copied from TikTok, iPhone camera copied from Huawei and so on ...*
看了下面的评论，大部分都是不屑和嘲讽，没事，我们要的就是这个效果。
挺好的，广大国际“友人”一定要保持这种心态
战忽局
是他们国家太弱了造不出大型航母，所以他们羡慕嫉妒恨
China is weak and not a threat. Don't worry about it. Nothing to see here. Go about your day. No need to prepare. Everything is fine.
@@shanerooney7288 Weak is Usa lost to Taliban🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Otan fail attack Venezuela
破防了破防了，看到很多人破防了 🤣🤣😂😂
I'm still waiting for the 007 Carrier...
It better be a stealth one as well.
Hey, I guess you're kidding. Does the stealth carrier USA have one?
You stole my joke...
@@航李-o9x 这只是中文军事论坛的一个经典玩笑
@@rogerkaii233 Brother, you can consider it after 30 years. After all, USA is responsible for daydreaming, while China is actually realizing it
The next one, Type 004 will be a revision of 003. But it will introduce nuclear power.
The comment sections be saltier than the Dead Sea lol
The electric magnatic caltpults on Chinese carrier is powered by newly developed Intermediate DC Link Voltage System, which is more stable and controllable than AC Voltage System installed in US Ford carrier.
well said. most American can only read pictures and shapes.
Ah finally someone who doesnt just cry like these americans with superiority complex
you're very professional
Wheres thw source for this ?
@@kasilva7716 there is no source the Chinese wouldn't leak actual specs for the ship is top secret just like the top speed of a Nimitz class carrier is classified but i can say its the fastest huge sea going ship in the world or was since the Ford entered service.
With a made in china stamp on the bottom you know its really high quality hey! :)
Great comment 😆😂
If this wishful thought makes you sleep better in the night, keep dreaming :)
Then you have to ask why those high-quality products Made in China are not in the US.
You look at your $5 Rolex and laugh.
@@dddddh1 I do,, I really do, it was also made in China 🇨🇳
Fujian is a fishing boat.
The inside of this carrier is bullshit
As a Chinese, I can tell you responsibly that this is the largest fishing boat in our country and it is made of paper.🤣
055也只是个渔船，
We are not bullying the Chinese people. We bully the fucking CCP full of Propaganda
I've seen a lot of liveleak videos, I know what China's build quality is like.
Good one. Lmao🤣🤣🤣
同志辛苦了😂
Those are excellent 3d renders!
yes
You nailed it, bravo
this comment actually got me good lmao
its made out of paper
The amount of salt in the comment section is more than the amount of salt in the water displaced by the carrier 🤣
还没形成战斗力，自嗨什么
Americans haven't had to deal with a rising power like China matching them in decades. They'll calm down and accept it eventually
So third place? Behind the US, twice?
Seems like most people who comment below have had a lemon for breakfast.
which costs $20 each in the US right now
Do not worry, China is only a developing country in Asia, he still has a long way to go。
out here in CA, we don't build ships we build camps for homeless
I think they prefer having a job and an actual roof instead of camps.
@Notch it Great, God bless the United States, China can only build plastic boats and doesn't have any aircraft carriers at all （KEEP AMERICA GREAT）
@W8ing Sim Camp? Not quite sure what you mean, God bless the United States （MAGA）
All the Americans in the comment section shitting about China wasting money on a new advanced aircraft carrier while their own government has 11 with 3 more on the way without giving a shit about kids getting shot in schools, sky high medical bills, and high levels of food insecurity and homelessness is just (*chef’s kiss) hilarious.
20 to only 2. 400 million more men than women. Dead culture. Paper dragon
There is way bigger social problem in China, at least US try to resolve their problems.
the westoid soy boy seethe, cope and projection is staggering. It's truly beautiful really. Thy cup run'th over. LMAO
Although the 003 carrier is conventionally powered, the electromagnetic catapult uses a medium-voltage DC all-electric system, which is more efficient than the American Ford class AC catapult. The 004 will be nuclear powered and electromagnetic catapulted. In addition, j-35 heavy stealth fighter jets, air Police 600 carrier-borne early warning aircraft and carrier-borne unmanned aerial systems are still being tested.
Catapults isn't a big deal for em, thats why vertical takeoff are existing
Good luck!
歼35跟F35一样是中型，歼20这种才是重型。
Why is everyone in this channel so salty like you guys literally hate countries for trying or something?
Because its Chinese
Yes and no. Many people are not a fan of the CCP and their oppressive government (which is Of course disproportionately oppressive to different ethnic groups such as the Uyghur Muslims. But China as a country shouldn’t be hated, just the government.
@@roadto10kwithnovideos4 lol bs western propaganda..
@@joek7031Just leave the western website then and go somewhere with no western "propoganda" then
Well, you see china is a potential adversary for multiple countries because china is so great at making friends with it's neighbors. Some of those neighbors have defense treaty with the US.
Wow, didnt expect to see here being filled with chinese and american 5 star generals.
Judging from how butthurted some of the comments are, I know those people are really worried about the Chinese strength.
How can I guess that your primary language is not English lmao.
Judging by how many copy-pasted replies saying this exact same thing there are I can't help but notice you are all insecure Chinese shills.
@@Theguyinthefez neither is yours. Your grammar is horrible
These haters just cant accept the fact that China is rivalling US in the sea. The Chinese electro rails tech leapfrogged the US about 10 years ahead according to one of the chines e scientist involved in this project. Must have been a breakthrough research.
Haha, you are an understanding person.
the saltiness in the comment section allows me to cook two pots of chaomian
fuck yeah. The westoid soy boy cope here is truly staggering...and it's just beautiful. Thy cup run'th over. LMAO
From Persia , all the luck for you brothers sisters from China
stop browning your nose. they don't like m@slimists in the middle kingdom
PERSIA AND CHINA ALLY TOGETHER TO DESTROY ROME
This comment section feels like everyone is just a bot
Seriously what is going on, both chinese and american commenters are just posting cringe.
@BlueHawkPictures because we’re awaking, we’ll not bow to imperialists.
Exactly what I was thinking, makes me lose trust on the channel
it do be like that on other chinese military-related videos too
@@JQ-po7hx which imperialist
Credit where credit due its a nice ship
I like the design too but the island of the ships seemed a bit odd for me
Why is everyone in this comment section so damn salty? Chill tf out
"There is no greater danger than underestimating your opponent" 老子 - (Lao Tzu/Old Master) - 4th century BCE
In 2021 the People's Liberation Army Navy (Chinese Navy) has commissioned at least eight Guided Missile Destroyers (DDG), two amphibious assault ships (LHD) and one nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN). Better take this seriously.
Agreed. Mitt Romney was right.
Brother, don't be deceived by the CCP. As a Chinese, I must tell you seriously that everything in China is synthesized by computer simulation.
实际上，中国的首批四艘两栖攻击舰，已经全部下水了。
China’s industrial infrastructure can easily build aircraft carriers nearly as big as US carriers. The issue is the operational effectiveness of their carriers. Building one is only half the battle. Having the experience to project carrier power is another. Even the Brits had to learn carrier operations from the US Marine aviation.
China will eventually learn to operate effectively, it is just a matter of time. In less than 50 years, China will sailing the seven seas with at least 15 carriers and some spares to protect South China Seas
@@michaele4830 And the U.S will only need one to take out all of them. If they even use it. They might just use any of the other oodles of crazy bullshit in the armory.
@@michaele4830 How is that going to happen, precisely? Given that China has no militarily capable Allies nor any previous experience or a battleground from which it could take such said experience?
@@yourewrong4090 Allies can be made. The rise of China is nigh unavoidable. The US is in rapid decline.
@@bloodfiredrake7259 Allies haven't been made since the end the second world war. And you don't just need any Allies, as China has now Allies too, one of which is the United States, however unwilling to share its vast military expertise with China. China is solely lacking in militarily capable Allies. Russia is a poor example, and no other country has nearly as vast of an experience in warfare as the United States. Are you going to say that there will be others? Which others? How is that going to happen? Believing into a fantastical reality is all fine with me, live in a world of fairy tales if you wish. I asked for examples wishing for a prosperous debate, but I get dubious fanboys looking to worship China and a "new world order". Relax in your chairs, reality isn't a video game and it often times isn't as simple as you think or would love to believe.
Funny comments! A lot of people here must have been beaten up by Chinese kids when they were young. Why so much hate? Lol.
They’re a revisionist power. It causes anxiety.
Brainwashed by the media since childhood, some people have never been to China 🤣🤣🤣 Western brainwashing can turn normal people into idiots without independent thinking
Man I dunno. I've been a Binkov fan for years but lately his comment sections have been filled with extremley stupid comments.
Perhaps a recent influx of viewers who don't know military history/concepts?
hahahahahaha
@@0sm1um76 no, I actually believe most of them are Russian and Chinese sponsored trolls in order to push their lil information wars.
Lost 10 IQ after reading comments section.
actually,its so happy to see so many salty comments,which really means China is becoming stronger.
Yeah… Definitely a correlation
yeah so happy to be indoctrinated!!
THE SEA IS ALWAYS A SALTY ISSUE,,, GET IT
ok chang
We be projecting SO hard bro lmao. It's funny. I love to watch us squirm and squeal. A truly great time to be alive. truly.
看到这么多人酸了我真他娘的开心
哈哈哈，放十年前这帮家伙会说你哪哪哪不行啥啥啥没有，虽然看着不爽但也算实情。现在除了核动力中国该有的基本都有了，这帮货就只剩下胡说八道瞎几把酸，看着笑死我了。
It's nice that the Chinese are representing people of the LGBTQ community! 0:12 very forward thinking of them!
In fact, the vast majority of Chinese people have a tendency to reject homosexuality. Homosexual groups are not popular in China from the official to the people, and they have no economic or cultural foundation in China.😂
Looking at the comment section reminds me of a sentence: The loser can do nothing but rage😂😂😂😂
Calm down buddy
@@Tugela60 看评论区，我只感受到了你们深深的恐惧，没有任何有建设性的评论，全是谩骂嘲讽，而这种情绪只能来自于自己的无能为力。
@@ylwu8990 Am I supposed to understand gibberish?
@@Tugela60 Haha thanks, I didn't get excited, I just felt funny.
Always great to see new Carriers coming out, no matter the country.
True... Idk why people in some comments talking here about politics.
@@knedlo7096 because people have egos
@@knedlo7096 when there is something like a carrier it’s going to get involved with politics kinda sad tho
@@doge3169 how its involved in politics, bruh? Its just ship so stop finding reasons to talking about politics ehn this is SHIP.
@@knedlo7096 but this ship is used to kill people and project power but I guess cool ship is nice ship
Great stuff Binkov! I'd love to see another video once more is revealed.
Honestly I just want to see the navalized J-20, it seems pretty cool
It's too big to get on an aircraft carrier, like US' F22 was never navalized.
J35 will fit, not J20.
The J20 has a power problem with poor engines. Short range, less carrying munitions and short range. They copied the Russians but not the engine.
@@jeffreyschwarz3699 so put it out publicly? Or you just made up pretty much everything
UNFORTUNATELY, IT CAN'T RESCUE THOSE TRAFFICKED WOMAN SUFFERING IN ISOLATED POOR VILLAGES IN DONGJI VILLAGE IN JIANGSU PROVINCE OF YOUR COMMUNIST CHINA !
Don't worry, my friends, 003 just use for fishing.
Yes, you're right bro.
For at least the next 6-7 years... It's just a big pile of scrap metal.
@聞洲 ohhh didn't know aircraft carrier is use for fishing, that mean USA has the biggest fishing boat in the world that so cool 😯
@@trieukhangtsai966 The 003 is nowhere closed to finished so it's useless. The US has 11 nuclear aircraft carriers that can be used in battle.
Yes you are right
So many "military geniuses" in this comment section, kinda cringy.
Pro and Anti China Americans in the comment section 🥤🍿
So many americans mad here, you cant show one piece of eastern tech without getting bashed with ,,iT LOoKs vErY cHeAPly MaDE"
It’s an objective FACT that Chinese carriers are far inferior than American ones. Because they are decades behind in development. Adding to that is the lack of experience the Chinese navy has. Numbers don’t account for much.
To be fair, most of the tech this Chinese carrier has is most likely stolen. So yeah...
@@Omi_Kasigi I don’t disagree.
I'm not American, you confuse being angry with being entertained
Don't think the america is the only country that hates china. the whole world hates china
I'd say Chinese type 003 super aircraft carrier is the most formidable warship ever built outside the US,desipte of being coventionally powered,it has the most advanced DC powerd electromagnetic catapult techenology which is even more reliable than what they are currently using on Ford Class(AC powered).Type 003 should officially enters sevice by 2025, 3 years later from now,when we'd see yet another larger type 004 launching ceremony.
The only weapon that matters to a carrier is its aircrafts, and China still does not have those aircrafts.
@@dannyzero692 pov su33 ripoff
Conventional power means it's range is limited, a disadvantage when fighting atomic powered ships. It needs oil, and China doesn't have its own.
@@jeffreyschwarz3699 The consumption of a carrier is almost zero compare to the consumption of a country with 1.4B people.
@@easonhuang7117 It still needs oil to run which is a liability. They should have gone nuclear.
Nevermind 003, when can we see 007?
Ooh! A communist Bond! Doesn't quite sit right, the Brit's might need to do a copyright claim.
As a chinese i could tell you that it is just a huge fishing boat
For a country that had its first aircraft carrier in 2012, people always compare China to the United States, and I think that's enough to make China proud, and if you believe it's just a big fishing boat, it's even better
No one except the propaganda tools lol Most of it comes out of the PRC shills anyway, from what I see in comments.
But all these Chinese are saying they will replace the us…..
@@doge3169 WTF？we all think there's still a long way to go , but future is hopeful, that's it 🤣
@@doge3169 Where are these, is it what your online friends tell you Chinese think? I think he's really, really awesome
@@doge3169 不然呢？
China keeps moving forward while the US keeps going backwards ! Lets go Brandon !
LOL keep dreaming the ford class carrier Gerald ford is in service china's probably got 6 years before it does and i say probably 6+ years since they have no one actually experienced to teach them.
@@codyspencer9798 you clearly aren’t up to date about China they are catching up if not surpassing the US in every field . sad but true .
Getting EMALS only 6 yrs after they debut on the Ford is very fast. What impresses is the sheer speed of iteration. And to the idiots who keep harping on the copy aspect, you can get the recipe but actually cooking the dish requires a lot more than just copying.
agreed. just cuz they built it doesn't mean they will be proficient in deploying it. The US has decades of experience and mature doctrine.
@@rickdiesel2k it is a start everyone start small
60 years of USN Carrier Strike Group Doctrine, through over 4 long wars, not including conflicts...good luck teaching that with meritless leaders.
@@rickdiesel2k 这几十年，美国有和真正的对手作战经验吗？伊拉克？阿富汗？格林纳达？
@@rickdiesel2k sad thing is.. he has right to call us idiots :(
The real interesting part will happen when she puts out to sea. What kind of other vessels will escort her? What armaments will those vessels carry? How far out from China will the entire carrier group travel? In other words, will the carrier group approach the American, European, Australian or Indian coastlines? That's when things will get interesting.
003 aircraft carrier just be used to protect China's territorial sea,instead of invading other countries, but several countries are used to bullying others. When others become strong, they will feel afraid because of their guilt and fear that they will be retaliated. There is an old Chinese saying: spend the belly of a gentleman with the heart of a villain. Perhaps this is the most vivid interpretation.
会的，我们会在美国海岸线自由航行
@@ziyunzhang7317 then stay away from the ROC(which is the only true china), the Philippines and other nations of the SCS. the paper tiger needs to take note of the paper bear currently getting its ass pushed in Ukraine. There's and old American saying speak softly and carry a big effing stick. china and Russia love to parade around they're new "high tech" weapons that probably don't work well. the USA doesn't hell the really really good shit people never seen before since the last wars weren't fought against near peers. the fact we will put a destroyer right on the ass of the newest operational carrier doing sea trails speaks a lot.
@@ziyunzhang7317 also the fact we use the F117 to test our air defenses against stealth shows the F117 is still stealthier than anything china and Russia currently has and that was developed in the 70's
@@codyspencer9798 No, this means that you cannot get latest stealth aircrafts from China or Russia and could use only your own obsolete tech hoping that it's comparable to ours.
Apparently everyone is an expert on naval combat
?
@@PersonaSimon Because they can 'determine' the combat capability of a warship without seeing her in action
They always say Chinese stuff will break apart immediately, but Liaoning, commissioned in 2012, is still working perfectly fine after ten years.
@@Super_Panther What is the maximum distance Liaoning has operated away from port?
@@fish_activity You could just go for wikipedia instead of asking me, I'm not an expert like some people in this comment section.
~2024 war against a lone China, lasting less then 3 years of extreme naval battles
Regardless of the new toy, the Chinese Navy needs to get up to speed on tactical usage. The US and Britain has several decades to work out the 'bugs' in thier carrier strike forces and honed their skills. It's just a matter of time before China can really compete militarily...they are desperately working on it.
working the bugs out ?
Do you mean murdering and raping innocent women and children like US and UK do ?
Finally someone with actual sense
When they get to type 007, while they invite Daniel Craig to the naming ceremony?
Yes, if he is still alive during that time. Although Britain might try to cancel Daniel Craig as a commie double agent.
Aircraft carriers are built to project power. Wether or not it's as functional as another carrier, is irrelevant to that premise. The fact that they made this investment in resources is what is important here. Do not foolishly underestimate their commitment.
for all the haters: you are so right and thanks for all your critical suggestions, China will keep improving it and make it better.
I.doubt it. It will always be a paper tiger.
@@7521eric well, nothing in the world stays the same. Just like the British colonized the world and now the US is the only superpower, or just like no one believed China could be the world’s second largest economy several decades ago, but time will give answers. Keep believing what we believe and then just wait.
@@7521eric lol u mean USA?
Doubt it.
Especially if it's "MADE IN CHINA"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@joserodriguezjr.6422 that’s a normal opinion. Doubt is needed, no doubt cannot bring progress. Be humble is always a good way.
The comment area is sour 😃
是啊，看着在挑衅中国实际上都是当笑话看的
以前都是印度人酸，现在终于美国人也酸了
It comes down to the training and naval doctrine. Unfortunately they don’t have much experience in this, as well as power projection. Only time will tell if the Chinese military can pull it off. You can build all you want, but if you don’t have the means to proficiently train and operate these systems at full scale, it’s kinda pointless.
Same BS over and over again. Remember back in 2001 when they predicted that it would take China "decades" to become part of the world market, let along a competitive player? In reality,20 years later China is the biggest trade partner to 2/3 of the countries in the world.
Thank you for you sincerely advise 😘
Sounds like cope tbh.
Cope harder next time when Type 004 shows up, see you in a few years.
@@BSPBuilder lol what? 😂
I’m surprised the Chinese built a flat top carrier before proving they mastered EMLS. Or making sure that conventional powered carrier would generate enough EMLS sorties. The Americans are still having problems with their EMLS even now. EMLS delayed the Gerald Ford by nearly 5 years.
The Fujian will be the first CATOBAR carrier to be conventionally powered in the world too. Time will tell. At least if the US had totally failed with EMLS they would have reverted back to steam. The Chinese have nothing to revert too.
The Geralf R Ford is now fully operational with its EMLS and will deploy to service later this year. The John F Kennedy will probably be deployed to active service in 2024 or 2025 so the US has solved EMLS now.
@@tylerclayton6081
Thanks for the correction
I had recently read somewhere that the cycles or launches between failures were still not satisfactory.
Thanks
Cheers
不，它只是一艘渔船。
True seems a bit rushed if I will
They comment section is full of childish comment
and racism
Lol the American and Chinese war hawks in here are too funny. There won't be a war, none of us will survive. Not you, not your families. So go out and get a job and make some friends instead.
And while America and China claim on each other all the way, they are still their biggest partner in every other non military area. I’d rather believe these 2 giant countries are just making a staged play to treat all the rest counties be their pet.
Go and interview Afghans, Iraqis, Syrians, you are really hypocritical
"War is delightful for those who've never experience it." A war between China and the USA will result in both losing
Nice to see Chinese navy wants to challenge US navy , this is a very good thing to have power balance , only with power balance the world can be more peaceful and less manipulated by one superpower
Unipolarity days are over.
中国只是发展好自己！
中国不是美国，思想程度上，美国还是几千年前中国淘汰下的思想
醋瓶子是整箱整箱的翻啊，味道太冲了。
Haha🤣