LOL jig - at the outset he says 'from around 2000 to 2004 or 2005', 4 to 5 years is hardly short-term results. Job cuts and cost cutting is a major part of the transition from an inefficient enterprise to an efficient enterprise - unfortunate as it is, but ultimately an efficient organization is better. Surely you can agree on that. In the long run being efficient will INCREASE jobs and INCREASE economic activity, stablility and greatly encourage inovation. ALL better for long term jobs.
This seminar is very good thanks
MIT
Great video!
LOL jig - at the outset he says 'from around 2000 to 2004 or 2005', 4 to 5 years is hardly short-term results. Job cuts and cost cutting is a major part of the transition from an inefficient enterprise to an efficient enterprise - unfortunate as it is, but ultimately an efficient organization is better. Surely you can agree on that.
In the long run being efficient will INCREASE jobs and INCREASE economic activity, stablility and greatly encourage inovation.
ALL better for long term jobs.
Hello from a global supply chain crisis
He talks about himself more than the subject..typical American :)