AEye iDAR: Sensor Performance Testing 2021

Поделиться
HTML-код

Комментарии • 7

  • @Masks_alot
    @Masks_alot 3 года назад +1

    Even though it is good to have such ranch, but what is the point? I think 300 to 400m for heavy vehicles is sufficient. To me if you can get better resolution and more points that is more important

  • @JOEYGDAT1DUDE
    @JOEYGDAT1DUDE 3 года назад +1

    KEWL!!!

  • @tobiaskonig8413
    @tobiaskonig8413 3 года назад

    Pretty cool to detect stuff at over 1000m, but the 'van' looked more like the icon of a house to me. Not sure if this would be enough to make any good decisions based off of this. Maybe if you have realy good AI looking at this data.

  • @nikoc.2101
    @nikoc.2101 3 года назад +2

    Not as good as MVIS

  • @Alexmei4577
    @Alexmei4577 Год назад

    I think Aeye is on the wrong way for automotive lidar. OEMs want to have a lidar with balanced specs that they can offord. Only ultra-long detection range and high resolution beyond reasonable requirements is ridiculous.

    • @AEye1550
      @AEye1550  Год назад

      This was a technology demonstration showing the range capability of our architecture. We've also released a video showing framerate capability of our architecture (ruclips.net/video/TyIf6kEyERg/видео.html) . For automotive deployments, check out this video showing how a 4Sight equipped ADAS or AV system can reconfigure itself to adapt to different operational domains (ruclips.net/video/l2whrGnxJ4s/видео.html).

  • @LinoBarraza
    @LinoBarraza 3 года назад

    What about some real world testing. An unobstructed path isn't realistic.