Deleuze, imo, is the most important thinker of the late 20th century as well as among the most if not THE MOST relevant philosopher today. Why is this? Post structuralist already know why but it’s network and complexity theory. If we know only one thing, we know that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Deleuze knew this better than any and it shows in all of his writings. He is very anti reductionist, and having learned complexity theory alongside deleuze and rhizomatic ontology, I feel as though he offers a revolving system or composite of several lenses in which to see the world through. The down fall of many is they never take the lenses off or try and change them, they deconstruct the world again and again and again in the same way yet expect a different findings. If the world is nothing more then processes and emergence, then we cannot bring about the new until we understand how things are grounded in difference. This was a dope reading. Is there a video or portion that involves some talking or critique on the literature?
Sounds fancy. We have an infinite number of dragons and angels, except they exist in a timespan too short to notice them. lol! Does he have any EVIDENCE for this? Seems like it's just a tirade of apodictical statements, which is what I expected from these pompous characters.
![[DTG_ENG_05] VIRTUALITY & ACTUALITY](/img/1.gif)
Deleuze, imo, is the most important thinker of the late 20th century as well as among the most if not THE MOST relevant philosopher today. Why is this? Post structuralist already know why but it’s network and complexity theory. If we know only one thing, we know that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Deleuze knew this better than any and it shows in all of his writings. He is very anti reductionist, and having learned complexity theory alongside deleuze and rhizomatic ontology, I feel as though he offers a revolving system or composite of several lenses in which to see the world through. The down fall of many is they never take the lenses off or try and change them, they deconstruct the world again and again and again in the same way yet expect a different findings. If the world is nothing more then processes and emergence, then we cannot bring about the new until we understand how things are grounded in difference. This was a dope reading. Is there a video or portion that involves some talking or critique on the literature?
Thanks for the comment. I have a Deleuze playlist with some more readings and analysis may be worth checking out.
Sounds fancy. We have an infinite number of dragons and angels, except they exist in a timespan too short to notice them. lol! Does he have any EVIDENCE for this? Seems like it's just a tirade of apodictical statements, which is what I expected from these pompous characters.
You sound far more pompous and arrogant tbh 😂