Physics 7 Relative Velocity (11 of 11) Airplane Direction with Non-Perpendicular Wind Direction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 дек 2024

Комментарии • 52

  • @akshatpandey9141
    @akshatpandey9141 3 года назад +6

    Addicted to this channel.

  • @yawt3836
    @yawt3836 3 года назад +4

    You are indeed a great teacher. I have search on how to solve relative velocity problems and still did not get the concept on the internet but you have made it easy for me to understand. Kudoos. Thank you very very very much.

  • @GenaEnSamIAm
    @GenaEnSamIAm 3 года назад +3

    Thank you so much for your brilliant work.
    I am a structural engineer in South Africa. I still reference you work to make sure I stay sharp. Your work is really special.
    Thank you again

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +1

      Thank you congratulations on becoming a structural engineer. Yes, I constantly find myself wanting to learn new things or relearn the old topics to stay sharp in my profession as well. Great to have you on board.

  • @thabangmalete4012
    @thabangmalete4012 Год назад +1

    Find the velocity relative to an inertial frame (in which the centre of
    the Earth is at rest) of a point on the Earth’s equator. An aircraft
    is flying above the equator at 1000 km h−1. Assuming that it flies
    straight and level (i.e., at a constant altitude above the surface) what
    is its velocity relative to the inertial frame (a) if it flies north, (b) if it
    flies west, and (c) if it flies east? please help with this

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +2

      You have to calcualte the velocity of a point on the equation. v = d/t = 40,000 km / 86,400 sec (or 86160 sec if we take a side-real day). = 463 m/sec = 1,667 km/hour Then you add the vectors.

  • @thabangmalete4012
    @thabangmalete4012 Год назад +1

    thank you sir for everything all the way from south africa

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +1

      Glad you found our videos. Welcome to the channel! 🙂

  • @bats8712
    @bats8712 9 месяцев назад +1

    Bro you're the goat

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  9 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you. Glad you like our videos.

  • @lawliet2263
    @lawliet2263 3 года назад +2

    Sir do you live in LA?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +1

      Yes, we live in a suburb of LA.

    • @lawliet2263
      @lawliet2263 3 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen awesome 😎 sir btw thanks for everything

  • @dhrubarupsarkar8718
    @dhrubarupsarkar8718 3 года назад +1

    Sir can you please make a video on metallicity calculation for star.. 🌟

  • @gauravbisht4649
    @gauravbisht4649 3 года назад +2

    Thank you Teacher
    🙏

  • @mohammadnazrulislamkhan452
    @mohammadnazrulislamkhan452 3 года назад +1

    does square root of the tenor field of type (1,1) exist?
    Please reply

  • @harunamohammed7940
    @harunamohammed7940 3 года назад +2

    Thanks for your help.

  • @Eveninanotherlife
    @Eveninanotherlife Месяц назад +1

    Thank you for helping my homework🥹🙏🏻 i hope u will a great day

  • @nobodynose19
    @nobodynose19 Месяц назад +1

    how is the resultant speed y equal to vp MINUS vwy as im seeing its plus?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Месяц назад +1

      From the drawing you can see that Vr is smaller in magnitude than Vpy

  • @Fortunate_crown
    @Fortunate_crown Год назад +1

    I just subscribed. ❤️
    Thank you! 🍷

  • @zuko-s9o
    @zuko-s9o 4 месяца назад

    can I find V(resultant) by taking the square root of ((V plane)^2-(V in the x direction of the wind)^2, whole thing minus V in y direction of the wind? I am getting 61.55; what I solved incorrectly??

  • @x-xDev
    @x-xDev 2 года назад +1

    Thank you, this helped me so much!

  • @ishmaelkainosmusanji9070
    @ishmaelkainosmusanji9070 3 года назад +1

    Thank you very much

  • @BriansLogic
    @BriansLogic 3 года назад +2

    I appreciate your mathematics are correct and you’re obviously very good at what you do, but at the risk of being a bit a stick in the mud, in reality the pilot is probably just going to rise a bit in altitude, and keep the North on the compass pointed towards the tail, as then you have to be flying south ?
    At least that’s what I would do, I’m not a Pilot and I do realise that there is trade winds up high all the time due to convection and stuff, but maths don’t seem like a fix when calculations are fixed, but the rate of the wind is not, and can change within minutes….
    There’s always one lol…. 😀

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +5

      Our rudimentary physics problems do not always mirror the real world (nor were they intended to), but they are supposed to lay down the ground work in understanding and in how to solve problems. (For example most of our problems ignore wind resistance - which is off course very unrealistic in the real world.) But we need to learn how to walk first before we can run.

    • @BriansLogic
      @BriansLogic 3 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen I understand why mathematics are necessary in physics, I just think that maybe there is the tendency to get lost in maths at times when it’s reality we must deal with.
      Either way I appreciate the reply, and I enjoyed your video….

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +2

      I definitely agree with that statement. When I was a student I always asked my professors for the relevance in the real world. We used to get lost in all the calculations and couldn't see how the equations meant something in the real world.

    • @BriansLogic
      @BriansLogic 3 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen There is never a danger of self delusion when you know the difference between an equation that does have a real world application, and an equation that doesn’t.
      The danger lies with people who can’t differentiate between the two, as I have personally dealt with a lot of people who can’t understand the difference, they argue that maths proves things, when maths only describes things, maths is a tool, and a very necessary one, but it won’t prove the natural cause to a natural effect, but if your an engineer then maths is invaluable.

  • @iramibtehaj567
    @iramibtehaj567 3 года назад +1

    Hi sir. Your lecture touches my heart.......carry on

  • @y_equals_mx_plus_c
    @y_equals_mx_plus_c 3 года назад +1

    I need this! 👩‍✈️🛩️

  • @qaisar.sulaiman
    @qaisar.sulaiman Год назад +2

    Gigachaddddd

  • @miguelferreiramoutajunior7932
    @miguelferreiramoutajunior7932 3 года назад +1

    Show!

  • @maggyhakko9247
    @maggyhakko9247 Год назад +1

    Thank u Mr👏💐🇳🇦🇳🇦🇳🇦

  • @dolumdoli7621
    @dolumdoli7621 3 года назад +2

    First