Just heard the official release and then found this version. The difference is stark. The official version just lacks...for want of a better word...that 60s magic dust. This version, albeit from this century, has the magic dust, the George Martinism, and the Beatlesqueness. Excellent.
This version reflects the real Beatles' classic features. George's slide guitar, Ringo's drums, Beatles' back vocals, Paul's singing in the bridge, John's original composition and his manner of performing. Great job!
While searching around for John’s original piano demo, I came across this amazing cover… I hate to admit it, but it sounds more Beatles-esque than the new Beatles version!! 😳 Bravo! 👏
This is everything the Beatles version should have been. Wish they would have heard this. The official version just doesn’t have the emotional impact of the complete song like this one does.
Came back here because the official version drops the pre-chorus "I don't wanna lose you, abuse you or confuse you". And I actually thought Paul will sing the "Sweet darling" part, but they omit it totally 😢
John Lennon would have preferred this version over the Beatles release today with a neutered Lennon voice! It's too sweet and precise for John. And this version has the original pre-chorus - "I don't wannna to loose you..." Why did Paul delete that section? Maybe he doesn't understand John as well as he thought. Let's let dead musicians lie please! Ortega does a wonderful rendition of this song. Maybe the best yet. Hats off to him!
You really made the song seem more alive in a way the new Beatles version does not -- and you produced it in the style that sounds reminiscent of the old Beatle harmonies and stylings. Thank you for this alternate version -- and amazing you did this 12 years ago!
I do like the new Beatles version but I think the "I don't want to lose you" bit is probably the coolest part of the song and they cut it (maybe just because the demo was too wonky there to work with?). Your version sounds great man.
This is a really good version, that takes the demo and better communicates it. It really sounds like a love letter to Paul. It really makes me think that if he lived, they would have performed again.
'Every now and then I miss you'.. Or from an time earlier : 'In my life, I love you more'.... Thank you my friend for all of these whimsical and endearing works, for time plays on us and we lose touch at times, here we are centered again. Peace..from Texas
I dont wanna lose you ( Paul ), No no no. Abuse you and confuse you, no no no. And if hv to go away.......brilliant John. I miss you. Thou I have not met you, oh no no no. Why they wanna kill you, oh no no no. Now and Then, I miss you ( John ).
yo tambien lloro con esta version. Tiene el espiritu Beatle en los arreglos y la idea completa de John con su cancion, la parte intermedia es una tensiòn imprescindible para que el estribillo tenga sentido, es la resolucion de esa tension.
Wow! This is way better than the official version. It just sounds like something the beatles would have done when they were together. The official version sounds too modern.
Yes, he kept the original sad feeling of the verse, kept the pre-chorus that is even more painfull and perfectly leads to the chorus that is much happier and entertaining with the choirs, it makes a beautiful contrast and better resolving.
Can't get enough of the Visual Creation you've brilliantly put together, nor of the Wonderful musical mix of John's heartwrenching, emotionally stirring "Now and Then". Thank you!
Son Los Escarabajos, banda española cuyos integrantes eran:. Enrique Sanchez, guitarra solista Benjamin Serrano : bateria y coros Jose Vaquerizo : guitarra y coros Miguel Labrado : bajo y voz principal
Spot on. The cover seems to have a heavier nuance of Beatle-esque qualities. I felt like it came from someone who really understood the assignment. This is the Beatles after all. It has to feel genuine and unique. And give credit to Paul and Ringo at making a beautiful attempt, but in my opinion this is one of those rare moments where the cover stands superior to the original.
The best version of this beautiful song. Here we are paying respect to this amazing cover just hours before of the release of the oficial song. I have been listening this version for 10 years already! Thanks!
Thank you for making this video, the music is beautiful, it's incredible to listen to one of John's last songs! The art is soo cool! Psychodelic, full of Beatle spirit, happy and uplifting and at the same time nostalgic...glad to see the other 3 Beatles smiling , coming togeteher for John once more❤
I admire what Paul, Ringo and Giles did, but this version captures the essence of John's song more than the AI version they attempted. I'm kind of surprised they didn't go in this direction. John would have, I think.
The AI only separated the vocals from the pianos, the rest were human decisions. The Beatles version is not trying to copy the 60s style as much, but it feels more nostalgic, but this one feels more like what they maybe would have done back in the day. It's great that we have the option to listen to all these versions. This video is 12 years old and until a few days ago I didn't know of this song.
@@Marian87 they gave the sole writing credit to John but nevertheless made decisions which John could not respond to. They should have left the song alone.
Quite the mini masterpiece, this one. Has the added angle of a weird and eerie environment, so it's not only an expected solid Lennonistic romantic endeavor but a very unusually haunting one as well.
Alvarortega, you have done the impossible. You have improved on John Lennon. Thanks so much for this. You did an outstanding job of integrating the video and audio elements. The addition of Los Escarabajos works perfectly. I think I have seen your video about 20 times so far and never get tired of it. This is exceptionally well done. I love it!
I agree, happy you will get your flowers now that the official version is out. John would have had a good laugh if he heard your version; shook his head and said it was better
Great visuals and arrangements. Love the newly-released, official Beatles track! Miss in it, the original demo bridge. Glad you chose to recreate it in your tribute cover. Your cartoons and other Beatle-related work is fab! Keep it up.
Better instumentation than the official Beatles release. What skill you brought to this! Congratulations. Whoever played the. guitar lead on this is really good!
The bridge you created between omitted part and the core of the song is brilliant! That’s what became a stopper for Paul. We don’t know all details about choices and problems he encountered during the production of the final version so … let it be! Once more, you are a great musician! I’m applauding your talent and guts!!!
While the cover by the Beatles became a hit, this version needs to be found by more people as it has so much more depth and so is now in the 🕴️ Lost Songs playlist.
*Have you contacted Jeff Lynne yet?!* *You should...NOW...without a doubt!!* Not that this is the definitive song, but he will see you got what it takes!!
I feel like this is the definitive arrangement instrumentally- the guitar work is so accurate to the Beatles style and complimentary to the chord progression and melody. Not to mention the harmonies! Fucking beautiful. I only have one gripe and that is the hard planning of the double tracked vocals on each side- a little uneasy when listening with headphones. I think tweaking the vocals’ place in the mix Is the only thing that could perfect this masterpiece.
My gosh, I don't know which version to pick, this one is a great rendition, Paul left out a portion of the original and this one includes late 60"s stile on top that is complete , I like this one a lot !!
This is really superb. Exactly what I needed to hear while we wait. Regardless how the official release turns out - I will remember what you did here. Bravo!
PERFECT......I can sooo feel John in this cover!!!!!! The guitar sounds like George too. It was not a Beatles song.....it's pure Lennon. Great! Such a relief.....thank you. The missing part is the most Lennonesque and without it the song feels .... amputated.
I have completely fallen in love with this version. The first part with the pre-chorus is so Lennon that is hurts and the main chorus is so unbelievably McCartney that it hurts even more. I get shivers every time that chorus drops. I am so grateful that this version exists. I like all versions, but the chorus on this recording absolutely kills me. It's almost criminal that they have left this out of the official version. Thank you so much!
Tengo tan interiorizada esta versión que, si lanzan este tema oficialmente va a ser legítimamente una sorpresa lo que hagan Mcca y Ringo. En parte espero tenga algo de similar a esta versión. Gran trabajo a más de una década ! Actualizaré este comentario en diciembre de 2023 (: EDITO en Noviembre de 2023: Evidentemente la versión oficial omite el pasaje "i dont wanna loose you" y las cuerdas le dan otra dimensión muy diferente, pero encuentro algunas similitudes en el tono de la guitarra de Harrison (aunque aquí con más presencia) y las figuras que hace el bajo en este gran cover. Sin duda esta versión suena como si la hubiesen terminado en los 90's con elementos del mismo Lennon en el Double Fantasy y más protagonismo de Harrison. Solo queda imaginar el resto de la canción oficial.
This is quite beautiful and a wonderful love letter to all the boys. Very 'Beatle' in the harmonies as well as Ringo and George like playing. Even a Beatley fade out! Thanks so much for this!!
The three remaining Beatles definitely should have mixed this and included in their Anthology albums. But you’ve done this overlooked gem justice and aren’t we all better for that😎👌
1:11 - 1:59 Thank you for not doing the foolish thing the band did in removing that part. It's by far my favorite part of the song, which made me listen to the rest. Especially the melody in "But if you have to go away".
@@fabianrapiman3579 no se si la mejor, pero es una parte escencial del viaje armonico para caer en el "now a then", es como un cuento que le sacas una parte. Crea una tension que se resuelve en al ultima parte.
Omg, this is so unbelievable you cover this song in 2011.. and i do agree john version is the best version ever.. I can feel the soul and thanks to cover this❤❤❤
Thanks for the great singing voice and video. It reminded me again that the Beatles are eternal and John is eternal. John's voice is great, but I prefer, This living voice. 27th anniversary has passed, but cheers! ありがとう、乾杯！
Eu amo a versão da banda e amo a versão do Álvaro Ortega. A versão da banda eu gosto por causa da história e pela harmonia, a versão do Álvaro eu gosto pela musicalidade e simplicidade. Edit: A única coisa que eles erraram foi em cortar o refrão. Senti falta do "i don't wanna lose you"...
Well, I heard the official version. They did a good job on Lennon's voice. However. The interpretation on this track was more musically tuneful, especially in the chorus. Also, they seem to have left out a whole linking section. This version is far more complete as a vision of what it should have been.
this version is 12 years old , and in 48 hours we will have the official Beatle version.
40 hours now ❤❤
its AMAZING !!!! LETS SEE :)
❤🚶🚶🚶🚶🎸
I think this version better than what came out today
I am so confused @@counterfeit1148
Just heard the official release and then found this version. The difference is stark. The official version just lacks...for want of a better word...that 60s magic dust. This version, albeit from this century, has the magic dust, the George Martinism, and the Beatlesqueness. Excellent.
Well said!
Exactly , I thought this version sounds like 1960s Beatles, whereas the official version sounds like 2023 Beatles- more melancholy, more of a goodbye.
That's because it's not the 60's!
Well, Free As A Bird and Real Love sound like 90s Beatles🤷🏻♂️ maybe that’s because we’re not in the 60s
Good for you you got the middle-aged pre-chorus fantastic
This version reflects the real Beatles' classic features. George's slide guitar, Ringo's drums, Beatles' back vocals, Paul's singing in the bridge, John's original composition and his manner of performing. Great job!
While searching around for John’s original piano demo, I came across this amazing cover…
I hate to admit it, but it sounds more Beatles-esque than the new Beatles version!! 😳 Bravo! 👏
Agreed @mikeportnoydt1
@@izcamiz +100
This is everything the Beatles version should have been. Wish they would have heard this. The official version just doesn’t have the emotional impact of the complete song like this one does.
This is best version ever.
You passed the audition
Listen to Claus Nielsen’s version .
Im in love with 2023 version until I saw this masterpiece cover. Far more better than 2023 version..
John would be proud.
Came back here because the official version drops the pre-chorus "I don't wanna lose you, abuse you or confuse you". And I actually thought Paul will sing the "Sweet darling" part, but they omit it totally 😢
I can't believe they did that! It makes the chorus hit so much harder in the demo. Ugh.
Me too, unbelievable
Agree totally 😮
Maybe it's the "Abuse you or confuse you" part ... great for rhyming but not thematically consistent
Yes agreed so sad i love that part of the song 😢
John Lennon would have preferred this version over the Beatles release today with a neutered Lennon voice! It's too sweet and precise for John. And this version has the original pre-chorus - "I don't wannna to loose you..." Why did Paul delete that section? Maybe he doesn't understand John as well as he thought. Let's let dead musicians lie please!
Ortega does a wonderful rendition of this song. Maybe the best yet. Hats off to him!
Bit harsh
How so Jimmy??? @@Multijoe84
That is a bit off. I'm sure Paul knows what was best for them. Let it be man.
I have to be honest i like this more than the original version ❤
As a life long Beatles fan, I have to say I'm conflicted to say I feel the same! :|
I agree
Totally agree!!!
I wish Paul had listened to this one before resuming work
I still don’t understand why they got rid of the pre-chorus, the more I listening the song the more frustrated I get.
You really made the song seem more alive in a way the new Beatles version does not -- and you produced it in the style that sounds reminiscent of the old Beatle harmonies and stylings. Thank you for this alternate version -- and amazing you did this 12 years ago!
Darn, I listened to the new original today...and yours is the best version, it's crazy! The vocals are better in your version, amazing work there!
I do like the new Beatles version but I think the "I don't want to lose you" bit is probably the coolest part of the song and they cut it (maybe just because the demo was too wonky there to work with?). Your version sounds great man.
Yes agreed
Couldnt agree more
This is great! More like the Beatles than the Beatles!
This is a really good version, that takes the demo and better communicates it. It really sounds like a love letter to Paul. It really makes me think that if he lived, they would have performed again.
Couldn't agree more ! It sounds just as if George Harrison had been in charge at the recording session. Magnificent !!
This version rocks! It sounds like a complete song, as opposed to parts just thrown in at random like the Beatles version. Great job!
'Every now and then I miss you'..
Or from an time earlier :
'In my life, I love you more'....
Thank you my friend for all of these whimsical and endearing works, for time plays on us and we lose touch at times, here we are centered again.
Peace..from Texas
Doesn’t get any more Lennon-y than this !
He was so brilliant.
I dont wanna lose you ( Paul ), No no no. Abuse you and confuse you, no no no. And if hv to go away.......brilliant John.
I miss you. Thou I have not met you, oh no no no.
Why they wanna kill you, oh no no no.
Now and Then, I miss you ( John ).
I like this version better! bravo ALVARORTEGA and Los Escabarajos!
I love this so much, I normally don't like coverbands but this was just beautiful.
And the Animation superb!!
I shed a tear for this art.
im crying this is better than the official release they just made lmaoo
Feels too repeative couse Paul did not use the i don't wanna lose you section + Ringo's drums are pretty thin and buried in the mix
I agree better than the official version
yo tambien lloro con esta version. Tiene el espiritu Beatle en los arreglos y la idea completa de John con su cancion, la parte intermedia es una tensiòn imprescindible para que el estribillo tenga sentido, es la resolucion de esa tension.
Wow! This is way better than the official version. It just sounds like something the beatles would have done when they were together. The official version sounds too modern.
Yes, he kept the original sad feeling of the verse, kept the pre-chorus that is even more painfull and perfectly leads to the chorus that is much happier and entertaining with the choirs, it makes a beautiful contrast and better resolving.
Can't get enough of the Visual Creation you've brilliantly put together, nor of the Wonderful musical mix of John's heartwrenching, emotionally stirring "Now and Then". Thank you!
I love the way they show all the Beatles while they sing, I miss you… makes me miss the Beatles. A beautiful way to be remembered.
These videos you do are terrific, they bring back memories and allow the Beatles Magic to be regenerated, thanks Good work on this song, as well
I come back to this everytime grateful for the thought put into the arrangment. Makes you appreciate having a good ass band.
Excellent! Pure & simple with hints of Jeff, George, Paul & Ringo...Great job!
Jeff?
@@jedicomedy Jeff Lyne. Maker of "Mr. Blue Sky" by Electric Light Orchestra, and producer of "Real Love," and, "Free as a Bird" by the Beatles
@@鳴る神 Oh right.
Una música psicodelica de 1967 q nos transporta a esa época maravillosa
Son Los Escarabajos, banda española cuyos integrantes eran:. Enrique Sanchez, guitarra solista
Benjamin Serrano : bateria y coros
Jose Vaquerizo : guitarra y coros
Miguel Labrado : bajo y voz principal
Spot on. The cover seems to have a heavier nuance of Beatle-esque qualities. I felt like it came from someone who really understood the assignment. This is the Beatles after all. It has to feel genuine and unique. And give credit to Paul and Ringo at making a beautiful attempt, but in my opinion this is one of those rare moments where the cover stands superior to the original.
Besides the bass line in the middle eight, everything else is pretty great~! including the slide guitar arrangement ....Awesome!
The mid 8th is very weak forced even.
@@mickavellian Its the Paul type of bass playing :"Uncle Albert" and the like around mid 70s, its perfect. Thanks, John M.
Beautiful, and more Beatlesque than the official Beatles release! And you kept the B section, which is my favorite part. Bravo!
By golly this is absolutely amazing.
Excellent! Caught the very essence of John's song. He's smiling right now I'm sure!
Best Now and Then ever. This could have been a Beatles classic and you brought it to life. Great job!
Now that the real version is being launched in a week I'm curious to see how similar to this will it be
The best version of this beautiful song. Here we are paying respect to this amazing cover just hours before of the release of the oficial song. I have been listening this version for 10 years already!
Thanks!
La mejor versión lejos!!!! McCa de segurolas que se inspiró en ti amigo. Gracias eternas!
Alvaro you work is amazing. Thank you so much for all these videos!!
Beautiful job - both sound and video. I am a Beatles nut but I never heard this before. The Beatles' positive spirit lives in South America.
Great masterpiece, thank you very much!
This is the definite version of this song. And truly Beatlesque; not what Paul did...
Thank you for making this video, the music is beautiful, it's incredible to listen to one of John's last songs! The art is soo cool! Psychodelic, full of Beatle spirit, happy and uplifting and at the same time nostalgic...glad to see the other 3 Beatles smiling , coming togeteher for John once more❤
Not sure, if I like this one better thant the one they just released today. They are both great for sure!
I admire what Paul, Ringo and Giles did, but this version captures the essence of John's song more than the AI version they attempted. I'm kind of surprised they didn't go in this direction. John would have, I think.
I agree. This is better.
The AI only separated the vocals from the pianos, the rest were human decisions. The Beatles version is not trying to copy the 60s style as much, but it feels more nostalgic, but this one feels more like what they maybe would have done back in the day. It's great that we have the option to listen to all these versions. This video is 12 years old and until a few days ago I didn't know of this song.
@@Marian87 The drums is soooooooo much better and most of all they left that beautiful part... "I don't wanna lose you..."
@@Marian87 the original sounds like a late 70s John Lennon song. Not like the Beatles back in the day.
@@Marian87 they gave the sole writing credit to John but nevertheless made decisions which John could not respond to. They should have left the song alone.
The best version, for sure. Thank you!
supercover smooth classy xcellent musicianship by all ! Congrats AO ! ageless !
Quite the mini masterpiece, this one. Has the added angle of a weird and eerie environment,
so it's not only an expected solid Lennonistic romantic endeavor but a very unusually haunting one as well.
DAMN!!! Amazing!! If I didnt know it was a cover, i would think it was all 4 Beatles together for this last unfinished John Lennon song. Great Job!
Street of dreams is his last song...
Alvarortega, you have done the impossible. You have improved on John Lennon. Thanks so much for this. You did an outstanding job of integrating the video and audio elements. The addition of Los Escarabajos works perfectly. I think I have seen your video about 20 times so far and never get tired of it. This is exceptionally well done. I love it!
Thank you very much Tood.
I enjoy your animations Alvora! :D
I agree, happy you will get your flowers now that the official version is out. John would have had a good laugh if he heard your version; shook his head and said it was better
Great visuals and arrangements. Love the newly-released, official Beatles track!
Miss in it, the original demo bridge. Glad you chose to recreate it in your tribute cover.
Your cartoons and other Beatle-related work is fab! Keep it up.
WOW!! The animation and version of this song are simply perfect.. you've done the boys proud
Agreed!!!!
Better instumentation than the official Beatles release. What skill you brought to this! Congratulations. Whoever played the. guitar lead on this is really good!
Perfect job. Song of genius. Without words, just tears
The bridge you created between omitted part and the core of the song is brilliant! That’s what became a stopper for Paul. We don’t know all details about choices and problems he encountered during the production of the final version so … let it be! Once more, you are a great musician! I’m applauding your talent and guts!!!
Wow ! This is an amazing tribute to the Beatles and John Lennon’s song Now and Then . Congratulations! Job well done !
Hope your stats go through the roof in the coming days. This is a great cover! I love the bridge (absent from The Beatles new version).
What a great cover, aswesome, you did an excellent job!
I can't wait to compare this amazing version to their Release with the AI John Voice Filter.
This is much better than official version released today 😂
While the cover by the Beatles became a hit, this version needs to be found by more people as it has so much more depth and so is now in the 🕴️ Lost Songs playlist.
This is a great cover. it's crazy that you uploaded this 12 years ago.
*Have you contacted Jeff Lynne yet?!*
*You should...NOW...without a doubt!!*
Not that this is the definitive song, but he will see you got what it takes!!
I feel like this is the definitive arrangement instrumentally- the guitar work is so accurate to the Beatles style and complimentary to the chord progression and melody. Not to mention the harmonies! Fucking beautiful. I only have one gripe and that is the hard planning of the double tracked vocals on each side- a little uneasy when listening with headphones. I think tweaking the vocals’ place in the mix Is the only thing that could perfect this masterpiece.
My gosh, I don't know which version to pick, this one is a great rendition, Paul left out a portion of the original and this one includes late 60"s stile on top that is complete , I like this one a lot !!
This is really superb. Exactly what I needed to hear while we wait. Regardless how the official release turns out - I will remember what you did here. Bravo!
Brilliant.! And the original was majestic!
This was my favourite song by John Lennon .. Now it is my all time favourite .. WELL DONE LADS BRAVA
PERFECT......I can sooo feel John in this cover!!!!!! The guitar sounds like George too. It was not a Beatles song.....it's pure Lennon. Great! Such a relief.....thank you. The missing part is the most Lennonesque and without it the song feels .... amputated.
this is sooo beautiful, congratulations, i love it! regards from rio de janeiro.
Lizzieeeeeeeeeeeee
@LILIAN VAZ PRO Oi Lilian! Era muita gente, difícil lembrar de cada um, mas bom saber de você! Beijos!
Brasil na área...
Outstanding in every way.Beautiful work lads
I have completely fallen in love with this version. The first part with the pre-chorus is so Lennon that is hurts and the main chorus is so unbelievably McCartney that it hurts even more. I get shivers every time that chorus drops. I am so grateful that this version exists. I like all versions, but the chorus on this recording absolutely kills me. It's almost criminal that they have left this out of the official version. Thank you so much!
Tengo tan interiorizada esta versión que, si lanzan este tema oficialmente va a ser legítimamente una sorpresa lo que hagan Mcca y Ringo. En parte espero tenga algo de similar a esta versión. Gran trabajo a más de una década ! Actualizaré este comentario en diciembre de 2023 (:
EDITO en Noviembre de 2023:
Evidentemente la versión oficial omite el pasaje "i dont wanna loose you" y las cuerdas le dan otra dimensión muy diferente, pero encuentro algunas similitudes en el tono de la guitarra de Harrison (aunque aquí con más presencia) y las figuras que hace el bajo en este gran cover.
Sin duda esta versión suena como si la hubiesen terminado en los 90's con elementos del mismo Lennon en el Double Fantasy y más protagonismo de Harrison. Solo queda imaginar el resto de la canción oficial.
Actualizalo el 2 de noviembre cuando salga la versión oficial.
Esta versión de los Escarabajos es excelente 👌🏼
A solo 7 horas de poder escuchar la versión final de los Beatles por última vez
The missing pre-chorus just kills me in the official v... This is a lovely cover - thank you!
Very cool to come back to your version after the release of the official song last night. You did great! I loved this song and your version for years!
Stunning. !!!!!. Love this version.
This is quite beautiful and a wonderful love letter to all the boys. Very 'Beatle' in the harmonies as well as Ringo and George like playing. Even a Beatley fade out! Thanks so much for this!!
The three remaining Beatles definitely should have mixed this and included in their Anthology albums.
But you’ve done this overlooked gem justice and aren’t we all better for that😎👌
Its coming out soon...
Perfect... well done
Eres todo un artistaaaaa!
Hermoso cover ,muy bella canción de mister lennon un genio
1:11 - 1:59 Thank you for not doing the foolish thing the band did in removing that part. It's by far my favorite part of the song, which made me listen to the rest. Especially the melody in "But if you have to go away".
3:38 Paul voltea de izquierda a derecha... Me encanta
Much much better than the official version!
Please, make this the official one!
Qué bonitooooo.... Me ha encantado.
Is a cover by Los Escarabajos. The singer is Miguel Labrado.
Exceptionally well done!
Muchísimo mejor y 1000 veces mas emocionante que la que acaban de hacer
Paul la cagó y sacó la mejor parte del tema!
@@fabianrapiman3579 no se si la mejor, pero es una parte escencial del viaje armonico para caer en el "now a then", es como un cuento que le sacas una parte. Crea una tension que se resuelve en al ultima parte.
12 years before Paul and Ringo official release you did a excelent job. Congrats
This song made me miss John Lennon and George Harrison even more
The Beatles vai passar mil anos e quem escutar pela primeira vez,nunca será a última enquanto viver ,obra de Deus!!!!!
Wow.. Esto si que no me lo esperaba.. 12 años antes de la version oficial... 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Increíble
Omg, this is so unbelievable you cover this song in 2011.. and i do agree john version is the best version ever.. I can feel the soul and thanks to cover this❤❤❤
Thanks for the great singing voice and video.
It reminded me again that the Beatles are eternal and John is eternal.
John's voice is great, but I prefer, This living voice.
27th anniversary has passed, but cheers! ありがとう、乾杯！
Eu amo a versão da banda e amo a versão do Álvaro Ortega. A versão da banda eu gosto por causa da história e pela harmonia, a versão do Álvaro eu gosto pela musicalidade e simplicidade.
Edit: A única coisa que eles erraram foi em cortar o refrão. Senti falta do "i don't wanna lose you"...
amazing version and amazing video, god job, a really good job!
This is so cool!
Especially after hearing the new one...
I wonder if Paul or Ringo listened to this before making their version... 😅
I agree ... this is much more colorful ... and full of ideas and appeal.
Well, I heard the official version. They did a good job on Lennon's voice. However. The interpretation on this track was more musically tuneful, especially in the chorus. Also, they seem to have left out a whole linking section. This version is far more complete as a vision of what it should have been.
Well I read the news today...
@@fergalhughes165who gives a shit. It is what it is and it's beautiful. Paul screwed it big time.
Essa versão é fantástica escuto sempre!
Paul la cagó en sacar la mejor parte del tema!
Es un placer escucharla. Gracias.