-_- guys you are just ugly. He said that he is in bad shape and have doubts about some of his opponents (not even about this exact game). Stop to exagerate everything.
@@xDEEZKNUGHTZx should I paste a game where I made more best moves than him? That means I cheated I guess, or rather, I'm the strength of someone who cheats without cheating? Wow. What a great compliment!
Tbf that game turned completely out of nowhere, and I was kinda taken aback by it too, but I think it's because the IM is an insanely good bullet player and Kramnik simply isn't and never has been.
btw hes ex world champion. ha actually know something about chess, wht do u think? everybody who critisize him was never on his level. all super GMs keep on complayinig about cheating on TT
Ameet is a guy i know in real life, top guy, successful businessman, absolutely no reason whatsoever to cheat in a titled Tuesday. Not in his character and no reason for it for the money. This doesnt prove anything but its worth knowing Also look at the history and snd context..its not like he's one of these guys with crazy performance every titled Tuesday above his grade. His performances are very normal for his grade, hes a strong IM but he's never at the top of the leaderboards... He just played a good game and Kramnik is old and not as good as he thinks anymore
bro you really didn't have to prove it nobody thinks he's cheating only mr kramnik does, his moves are very straightforward, he was just playing top level blitz chess but mr kramnik doesn't believe an IM can beat him
Idk anything about cheas, but I do feel like kramnik plays slow af. You see other chess players move their pieces a lot faster and in such a fast time format kramnik loses so much precious time because he's slow mechanically.
If you do not know anything about chess then do not comment! Kramnik is 3000 rating! Do you understand how fast he is? The opponent must be crushed with their difference in ratings. Instaed the IM won with ease.
@evansm86 if you had any reading comprehension, you'd understand that I'm talking about his mechanical skills with a mouse, dudes slow af and wastes precious seconds with how long it takes him to move a piece on the board.
Yea, vaping and he looked tired as well - I'm a 2000+ at best and even I saw that blinder he made with the knight - Chess is the most cheated game though, especially in anonymity because of the nature of the machinating mind actually being a muscle - The bible refers to it as a fleshy mind - The person thinks they have lost because of the way it contracts in the body as a negative feeling, and because of this, and because people don't like feeling bad, the impulse to cheat is very powerful - It is also how the world is acquired which was never affordable via a narcissists, hence all the conflict when loosing something which was never acquired.
@@billyjames9861 I have a 5+ year chess account and I can confidently say I've never consulted an engine during a rated or casual game. I think it's useful to play against machines but using a machine to have a narcissistic experience was never an interest of mine. Imagine not being able to play your game unless you are in specific conditions like being able to cheat from your room. It's sad! But people grow up! Thankfully I've never cheated an engine evaluation during one of my games ever and it's a good feeling! I just got refunded bullet points because I must have lost to a cheater. It happens.
Its astonishing how hes at that level of mystery at something and still acts that way. Like he knows the incredible huge as FUCK mountain he climbed to reach a level of mastery of legend. And when he see's someone else win he just gets mad? Like bro wtf. Like how? Theres basically nobody who understands the insane journey you have gone through, normally people at this level of anything that see others as actually as good if not better have a insane amount of respect for them because they know. Its not like they dont care and are just good they actually went through it and what they must have gone through to reach it. How the fuck is he that rank with this mindset
wait, are you serious? 0.o As an 1900-2000 rated player, to me it seemed like Kramnik went to an endgame with two rooks + bishop against a knight and and the bishop pair for no reason, instead of exchanging equally. Having rooks in such a position will very obviously be harder to play. Coordinating the bishop and targeting weaknesses is very obvious to do regardless of the time pressure. I see no reason for any cheating allegations. How exactly is even a chess bot or engine supposed to start playing for you only in the end when you are running out of time if you haven't cheated the whole game? Wouldn't it be more logical to use it in the middlegame?
@@michalrehacek3462 for no reason? This guy is a grandmaster, you really thought you would be able to analyze the intensely high quality of his game? All joking aside, he sure did complain a lot. Maybe he should take a break from this competition and only play against verified opponents that Kramnik can know for a fact don't cheat.
@@snared_ yeah I think Kramnik has become the textbook example of the confirmation bias phenomena. He pointed out a real problem, but now he attributes basically every failure of his to cheating. (sure, some of his losses are against actual cheaters, that's just a statistical fact, but I am convinced he overestimates the amount by a large margin). It's sad to see, because that type of attitude kills ones growth and focus to learn from mistakes.
@@michalrehacek3462 In a sick and twisted way, it kind of makes sense to see him vaping while doing this, doesn't it? I hope it's not real vape but it appears to be real. He's stunting his growth in multiple ways then according to the sum of our beliefs..
He’s not always wrong, but in this case Kramnik is getting suspicious whilst the guy is moving fast. He doesn’t realize that he can’t input moves into a computer and then play them against Kramnik that quickly. Also I’m aware there are bots, but what are the chances this guy randomly turned one on with only 5 seconds on the clock?
kramnik loses so much time on the moves that he has already decided to play. he could very well win the time scramble if he could just play the knight to F1 and keep the pressure with tactics since he has a rook up in position
92% isn't even that crazy 😂 probably just played in him in a line he's super familiar with based on how he was rattling out opening moves, and an excellent bullet player based on the end of the game.
I had days when 2000 players had 90 +% on Lichess the whole day. That is the beauty of online chess. You discover chess geniuses every day that have no title and play like grandmasters. Some even display their fide rating which is more than once 1500 and below. Everyone who believes in the honesty of online chess should ask himself why the OTB tournaments sometimes look like security zones in the airport where terrorists are the threat.
@@Christian-mj7qj and…. What does that prove? Nothing. Who knows what you did in the first place. And if you were honest it is still a very unlikely exception that does not happen all the time but very rarely. I’d it happened all the time by various players you know something smells fishy. Old fish you know. Stockfish…
@@wolfhard2420 Exactly, that proves nothing exactly like your argument and Kramnik's proves nothing. The guy in the video played best moves by capturing blundered pieces and kicking off a rook while Kramnik shuffled left and right senselessly.
@@davidemirante9405exactly that's what mainly time scramble is you just don't blunder your pieces try to give some threats so that if he pre moves or doesn't move that piece you could capture it he just kicked his rook and then improved his position luckily it was the best moves but also very practical and he was already winning as kramnik blundered, 2 pieces for a rook always has an advantage
i can understand him cause it s absolutely not possible to play 8/10 games with more than 90% accuracy otherwise you are a GM I also got bored sometimes I feel the same like Vladimir, the opponents just plays strange moves, they cannot count this, it s simply out of a engine. I am so often better than my opponent and then out of nowhere he has a win position and my accuracy was 75% percent or more so how is that possible. They play liek world champs sometimes better than a GM but they are IM or lower..so something in this online shit is not correct i guess there are many many cheaters, over the board they would loose all games this loosers.
Well i never liked Kramniks attitude of accusing people very often without any proof but in here he is right to be suspicious as his opponent played suspiciously well in a difficult position when his bishop was pinned and he only had few sconds left yet he played all the best moves in just one sec. or less. This also happens very often at online chess, when NN players plays way too confidently accurate in blitz bullet chess with making super fast moves at the same time. I agree with Kramnik in here, at least he should be suspicious after how his opponent played like a god in the endgame. His suspicion is very normal to say the least.
high percentage at low elo doesn't mean much because it's all blunders. If you play a basic opening and then your opponent blunders the queen and you take and he resigns, that could even be a 100% accuracy game. But at high elo there are no such blunders, the blunders are many moves ahead which is why accuracy is much more complicated
Kramnik was confused by move four and then burned a minute thinking about his next three moves. No wonder he lost with that amount of time mismanagement.
You would probably cheat to beat a 250 elo. Hikarus channel is over there 👉🏻 ask him if he’ll bend over so you can fully submerge that brown nose of yours
Did Mr. Kramnik complain that it is not believable that an IM plays a game with 91 % Accuracy? I am a 1150 Player and sometimes even I play a 90 or 93 % accuracy game.
I'm 900 and my record for a game that reached end game was 94%. Funny thing is, that since I'm not too good, I thought I had played poor game and won by luck but Stockfish tought differently...
Your accuracy is not comparable to their level because they are playing on a very high level meaning it's harder to be accurate. That said, Kramnik has lost the thread completely.
Guys...if you play against a 2000, you will never have above 60%...The guy knows much more than a 1000... I have had 90% against my fellow players 1300, but i play against 1500-1600, i get much lower..
Doesn't matter you get +90% against noobs. Getting +90% against an ex world champion is on another dimension. I'm not saying is not possible of course. It is certainly possible. It's just not the same thing that you're saying.
@@valec9186 No, at lower level players get 90 percent only when the other blunders..which often happens. When people blunder big, your great moves are pretty ez to spot.. At that high levels, getting smaller advantages is very hard ...positional advantages.. Getting a 90+ in that way is the hard way.. Not every 90% is equal in quality.
What a hypocrite ,Kramnik feels sorry for the generation watching hikaru’s cuss words and now what’s he doing ? VAPING infront of million younger generation.
@@potzysk2 he did it once in twitch I guess which kramnik exploited to Target hikaru, I saw it in a video of kramnik's stream while he was reacting to Hikaru's stream.
And someone said that forced moves still give you accuracy. Like blocking a check or moving your king under check with one move. most of my games are bad becaus I am bad, but I have had 90%+ accuracy simply being forced around the board after a book opening and one or two big time blunders.
programs has existed for decade to automatically play or show the best move for you while you're playing, one second of thinking for an engine like stockfish is a lot of thinking, but if the moves were not played automatically, humans wouldn't have the time to see the engine move and play it with the mouse for 5 moves in a row under 1s with no increment. That's the danger of accusing of cheating then it's everywhere, and while kramnik completely lost his mind with cheating accusation, well out of every reports he made some of them probably were right. I'm a 2100 lichess bullet player myself and at the end, kramnik took his time to play the knight move, giving opponent time to think as well, after the rook sac, white's moves are a bit easier to come up with, this is not obvious cheating at all
Dude u can beat Magnus in TT starting with 3;00 and finishing with 3;30 not even being in front of ur pc just start auto run with no delay and bot gonna do every top engine move in 0.1 sec ^.^
Yes, i guess it's cheat user. This is how most of "clever" cheaters playing: 1) playing without computer assistance or only few moves with assistance 2) get losing position / low time 3) playing instant best moves in a seconds 4) winning the losing position because of pure chess skills :)
I mean he does have a point. For 3 minutes it was slight advantage kramnik, then with 5 seconds left he crushed him playing the best moves. Like this IM 100% cheats
@@Szabby999 This IM is clearly not cheating in my opinion but there are programs that can input moves for you. It is defnitely possible to cheat with less than a second even, by simply pressing a button and toggling a bot
I cheat sometimes. The IM's play looks like something you get when you are cheating. The ratio of best to good/excellent moves in a fast game, for his rating, is suspicious.
Alright, it’s very clear to me now. I mean I would never find that move, even in classical, and he finds it instantly. Vladimir “The Procedure” Kramnik- probably
I feel bad for his mental health therapist, if he has one. I am also an old person, but unlike him, I understand the reality, that every generation is better than the previous one, especially when you don't know how to premove
This dude quits Titled Tuesday twice on every Tuesday.
hhhhhhhhhh
nothing new form Russians...
@@sundaymorningmassradioshow8624 Ok relax with the racism, don't act like Kramnik or all other russians support the Russian Voldemort
@@sundaymorningmassradioshow8624 Can you please delete your inappropriate comment?
@@SpeedupaxterWhy? It is the truth.
Procedure has started again
He more quits than starts.
If you don't cheat normally, please make an exception against Kramnik.
This man needs to be driven to insanity to improve his cognition.
Agreed... One must face their demons before healing begins
Loser troll
I would definitely cheat exclusively for Kramnik Soyboy
Besides the fact that this would literally justify the stuff he says and make it worse
Just flag him. He's only rated 3000 because people resign when they lose material.
Kramnik blunders the exchange - then gets upset that his opponent is capable enough at chess to convert the obvious win ...
A 2800 rated international master no less. What a joke that he considers a master a cheat for finding easy, active moves in bullet
@@foraminutethere23 he made mistakes and the opponent took advantage, still calls them a cheater.. hilarious
No you’re wrong. He do the procedure.
Kramnik turns Titled Tuesday into Tilted Tuesday.
LOL!
opponent:plays reasonable moves following chess principles
kramnik: yeah, he is clearly cheating
There's no question, always playing first line lol
-_- guys you are just ugly. He said that he is in bad shape and have doubts about some of his opponents (not even about this exact game). Stop to exagerate everything.
@@xDEEZKNUGHTZx should I paste a game where I made more best moves than him? That means I cheated I guess, or rather, I'm the strength of someone who cheats without cheating? Wow. What a great compliment!
Tbf that game turned completely out of nowhere, and I was kinda taken aback by it too, but I think it's because the IM is an insanely good bullet player and Kramnik simply isn't and never has been.
btw hes ex world champion. ha actually know something about chess, wht do u think? everybody who critisize him was never on his level. all super GMs keep on complayinig about cheating on TT
some of these very young IM's playing chess 24/7 and are very underated over the board
They also study chess daily.. I doubt Kramnik studies much nowdays since he ain't competing.
Ameet is a university graduate, i had the privilege of meeting him in person before covid
Vladimir "Mouse..........Click" Kramnik
Dragging the pieces makes the moves weaker
Ameet is a guy i know in real life, top guy, successful businessman, absolutely no reason whatsoever to cheat in a titled Tuesday. Not in his character and no reason for it for the money. This doesnt prove anything but its worth knowing
Also look at the history and snd context..its not like he's one of these guys with crazy performance every titled Tuesday above his grade. His performances are very normal for his grade, hes a strong IM but he's never at the top of the leaderboards...
He just played a good game and Kramnik is old and not as good as he thinks anymore
Right he thinks just cause he has a GM title that means he's automatically better,Kramnick needs to see a therapist
GM who retired how long ago? That's the thing to remember.
successful businessman + 2k7 at chess? dayum... I wish I was like this
bro you really didn't have to prove it nobody thinks he's cheating only mr kramnik does, his moves are very straightforward, he was just playing top level blitz chess but mr kramnik doesn't believe an IM can beat him
@@AdamZerhouni-g3l everyone he loses to is automatically 100% obviously cheating, according to him 😂😂🤣🤣
Okay, let’s do the procedure..
most people call it titled tuesday, but for kramnik its tilted tuesday
1:55 very interesting
0:22
What’s so interesting about it?
@@joeyblogsy Kramnik blazin'
ahahahaha
I just like to hear his howl again and again =DD
this guy really wants every opponent to blunder 🤣🤣🤣
Kramnik: blunders
Kramnik: let’s do the procedure
Idk anything about cheas, but I do feel like kramnik plays slow af. You see other chess players move their pieces a lot faster and in such a fast time format kramnik loses so much precious time because he's slow mechanically.
If you do not know anything about chess then do not comment! Kramnik is 3000 rating! Do you understand how fast he is? The opponent must be crushed with their difference in ratings. Instaed the IM won with ease.
@evansm86 if you had any reading comprehension, you'd understand that I'm talking about his mechanical skills with a mouse, dudes slow af and wastes precious seconds with how long it takes him to move a piece on the board.
yeah it's quite sad actually, I think he should go play longer time controls
@@evansm86 he's slow as hell and made obvious blunders. That guy was not cheating, precious Kramnik
He's just a boomer, let's just see the comedy in it.
When finally Kramnik ban all the cheaters I be able to get my IM or even GM 😅
That double click for some reason is really fucking annoying 😂🤷🏻♂️
Does Kramnik not realize that IM's are good at chess? He's acting like he's playing 1200s.
So true 😂😂
This IM has 2500 FIDE so he has GM strength
Let's do the procedure
Kramnik vaped is mental dropping !
Yea, vaping and he looked tired as well - I'm a 2000+ at best and even I saw that blinder he made with the knight - Chess is the most cheated game though, especially in anonymity because of the nature of the machinating mind actually being a muscle - The bible refers to it as a fleshy mind - The person thinks they have lost because of the way it contracts in the body as a negative feeling, and because of this, and because people don't like feeling bad, the impulse to cheat is very powerful - It is also how the world is acquired which was never affordable via a narcissists, hence all the conflict when loosing something which was never acquired.
@@billyjames9861 I have a 5+ year chess account and I can confidently say I've never consulted an engine during a rated or casual game. I think it's useful to play against machines but using a machine to have a narcissistic experience was never an interest of mine. Imagine not being able to play your game unless you are in specific conditions like being able to cheat from your room. It's sad! But people grow up! Thankfully I've never cheated an engine evaluation during one of my games ever and it's a good feeling! I just got refunded bullet points because I must have lost to a cheater. It happens.
This is how chess madness began.
Where Kramnik looked at at 2:10? Very interesting
A lot of those "best" moves were pretty obvious. Trapping Kramnik's rook? priceless.
i love Kramnik accusing all these blokes :)
To be fair, his opponent looked sus in this game
Its astonishing how hes at that level of mystery at something and still acts that way. Like he knows the incredible huge as FUCK mountain he climbed to reach a level of mastery of legend. And when he see's someone else win he just gets mad? Like bro wtf. Like how? Theres basically nobody who understands the insane journey you have gone through, normally people at this level of anything that see others as actually as good if not better have a insane amount of respect for them because they know. Its not like they dont care and are just good they actually went through it and what they must have gone through to reach it. How the fuck is he that rank with this mindset
Bro never gives his % score XD
I had no idea Kramnik vaped, lol!
@Vvs..12392 true. he was a smoker like myself. and i can assure vaping is way better.
@@haggaisimon7748both are terrible 4 your health
@@cc-oo7vnnot enough evidence for vaping to claim that buddy
@@cc-oo7vnpfp gave me some major flashbacks lmaoo
@@thecoconutgum oh yeah yeah
Even me with fide 2100 sometimes I get 90%or more just by accident
I think is Joaquin Phoenix trolling us
How does an opponent cheat and make moves instantly??
0:59 "I forgot everything" .... "I'm too slow"..
Like, he knows but can't accept it.
The bishop pair was too powerful 😂🎉
9:04Bro said im not be able to do this (so why my opponent)💀
First Nf3 and then Ne1, giving 2 attacking pieces for 1 rook was such a stupid decision... objectively, and even more so with the time situation.
Totally, he put everything on the pin on bishop and forgot guy can bring back his other bishop xzd
Obvious cheater. Lets see how he increased his strength in the last 15 seconds. Overmind.
бот
wait, are you serious? 0.o
As an 1900-2000 rated player, to me it seemed like Kramnik went to an endgame with two rooks + bishop against a knight and and the bishop pair for no reason, instead of exchanging equally.
Having rooks in such a position will very obviously be harder to play. Coordinating the bishop and targeting weaknesses is very obvious to do regardless of the time pressure.
I see no reason for any cheating allegations.
How exactly is even a chess bot or engine supposed to start playing for you only in the end when you are running out of time if you haven't cheated the whole game? Wouldn't it be more logical to use it in the middlegame?
@@michalrehacek3462 for no reason? This guy is a grandmaster, you really thought you would be able to analyze the intensely high quality of his game? All joking aside, he sure did complain a lot. Maybe he should take a break from this competition and only play against verified opponents that Kramnik can know for a fact don't cheat.
@@snared_ yeah I think Kramnik has become the textbook example of the confirmation bias phenomena.
He pointed out a real problem, but now he attributes basically every failure of his to cheating. (sure, some of his losses are against actual cheaters, that's just a statistical fact, but I am convinced he overestimates the amount by a large margin).
It's sad to see, because that type of attitude kills ones growth and focus to learn from mistakes.
@@michalrehacek3462 In a sick and twisted way, it kind of makes sense to see him vaping while doing this, doesn't it? I hope it's not real vape but it appears to be real. He's stunting his growth in multiple ways then according to the sum of our beliefs..
He’s not always wrong, but in this case Kramnik is getting suspicious whilst the guy is moving fast. He doesn’t realize that he can’t input moves into a computer and then play them against Kramnik that quickly. Also I’m aware there are bots, but what are the chances this guy randomly turned one on with only 5 seconds on the clock?
it is true that as long as we play on the internet, chess will be degraded
kramnik loses so much time on the moves that he has already decided to play. he could very well win the time scramble if he could just play the knight to F1 and keep the pressure with tactics since he has a rook up in position
92% isn't even that crazy 😂 probably just played in him in a line he's super familiar with based on how he was rattling out opening moves, and an excellent bullet player based on the end of the game.
He is so bad. How the hell did he ever beat Garry I wonder? If he played him today in a match, Garry would annihilate him.
He got lucky with the Berlin, Garry wasn't ready for it and spent the rest of the match trying to break it down...
How is bro mad he blundered Rxe1 hahahaha
I had days when 2000 players had 90 +% on Lichess the whole day. That is the beauty of online chess. You discover chess geniuses every day that have no title and play like grandmasters. Some even display their fide rating which is more than once 1500 and below. Everyone who believes in the honesty of online chess should ask himself why the OTB tournaments sometimes look like security zones in the airport where terrorists are the threat.
Yo, I had 90%+ in the Major part of my last games and I'm not a Genius or a titled player. It really depends on the game and on the position
@Christian-mj7qj Also how many moves are played...I got 97 the other day in bullet but only 18 moves! Crushed the player though lol
@@Christian-mj7qj and…. What does that prove? Nothing. Who knows what you did in the first place. And if you were honest it is still a very unlikely exception that does not happen all the time but very rarely. I’d it happened all the time by various players you know something smells fishy. Old fish you know. Stockfish…
@@wolfhard2420 Exactly, that proves nothing exactly like your argument and Kramnik's proves nothing. The guy in the video played best moves by capturing blundered pieces and kicking off a rook while Kramnik shuffled left and right senselessly.
@@davidemirante9405exactly that's what mainly time scramble is you just don't blunder your pieces try to give some threats so that if he pre moves or doesn't move that piece you could capture it he just kicked his rook and then improved his position luckily it was the best moves but also very practical and he was already winning as kramnik blundered, 2 pieces for a rook always has an advantage
Plays very slowly, then blunders two pieces for a rook, then claims his opponent his cheating. He can't HANDLE losing.
Maybe Mr. Kramnik should only play classical chess.
i can understand him cause it s absolutely not possible to play 8/10 games with more than 90% accuracy otherwise you are a GM I also got bored sometimes I feel the same like Vladimir, the opponents just plays strange moves, they cannot count this, it s simply out of a engine. I am so often better than my opponent and then out of nowhere he has a win position and my accuracy was 75% percent or more so how is that possible. They play liek world champs sometimes better than a GM but they are IM or lower..so something in this online shit is not correct i guess there are many many cheaters, over the board they would loose all games this loosers.
i am 1100elo and i am getting crushed by 1300elo - almost 90% accuracy. this is daily chess ;-)
I think kramnik is mad with engine chess xd but thats chess now
Well i never liked Kramniks attitude of accusing people very often without any proof but in here he is right to be suspicious as his opponent played suspiciously well in a difficult position when his bishop was pinned and he only had few sconds left yet he played all the best moves in just one sec. or less. This also happens very often at online chess, when NN players plays way too confidently accurate in blitz bullet chess with making super fast moves at the same time. I agree with Kramnik in here, at least he should be suspicious after how his opponent played like a god in the endgame. His suspicion is very normal to say the least.
Let's do procedure
Even at elo below 600 I had some 90%ish games
high percentage at low elo doesn't mean much because it's all blunders. If you play a basic opening and then your opponent blunders the queen and you take and he resigns, that could even be a 100% accuracy game. But at high elo there are no such blunders, the blunders are many moves ahead which is why accuracy is much more complicated
That guy is not what it used to be, he should know already... his game is obsolete at GMs levels.
So does he expect an IM to play like a 1500?
Сколько еще осталось не забаненных?)
Kramnik was confused by move four and then burned a minute thinking about his next three moves. No wonder he lost with that amount of time mismanagement.
I mean yeah clock make me lose again really suspicious let’s check clock accuracy…100% of course let’s do procedure report and block clock
Kramnik’s fisrst slow calculation starts after c3 at 3:02 (move 9 and not 4). And he spends a lot of time after the next move Re1.
But still have more time that his opponent...
I’d cheat exclusively against Kramnik.
You would probably cheat to beat a 250 elo. Hikarus channel is over there 👉🏻 ask him if he’ll bend over so you can fully submerge that brown nose of yours
How can he not understand percentages? Lol,
ok...let's all cheat against kramink !!!!!
He dont play TT because he was suspend for cheating, using an other GM account. its not related to this game at all. @clickbait
A lot of those "best moves" were obvious to even a 2000 like me. I mean come on, Kramnik, I get that you're salty but even you can see that right?
Hey I need what he smokes
But he didnt do the procedure :(
Kramnik click moves, already losing.
Did Mr. Kramnik complain that it is not believable that an IM plays a game with 91 % Accuracy? I am a 1150 Player and sometimes even I play a 90 or 93 % accuracy game.
I'm 900 and my record for a game that reached end game was 94%. Funny thing is, that since I'm not too good, I thought I had played poor game and won by luck but Stockfish tought differently...
Your accuracy is not comparable to their level because they are playing on a very high level meaning it's harder to be accurate. That said, Kramnik has lost the thread completely.
Guys...if you play against a 2000, you will never have above 60%...The guy knows much more than a 1000...
I have had 90% against my fellow players 1300, but i play against 1500-1600, i get much lower..
Doesn't matter you get +90% against noobs. Getting +90% against an ex world champion is on another dimension. I'm not saying is not possible of course. It is certainly possible. It's just not the same thing that you're saying.
@@valec9186 No, at lower level players get 90 percent only when the other blunders..which often happens.
When people blunder big, your great moves are pretty ez to spot..
At that high levels, getting smaller advantages is very hard ...positional advantages..
Getting a 90+ in that way is the hard way..
Not every 90% is equal in quality.
Did the needful
Poor clown
He is right this time
@@mcw5181 hahaha 🤣
He not good at Blitz tho, he to much thinking.
What a hypocrite ,Kramnik feels sorry for the generation watching hikaru’s cuss words and now what’s he doing ? VAPING infront of million younger generation.
Hikaru doesn't use "cuss words" in his streams. Have you watched them?
@@potzysk2 he did it once in twitch I guess which kramnik exploited to Target hikaru, I saw it in a video of kramnik's stream while he was reacting to Hikaru's stream.
i am 2200 and i literally have had games with higher then 92% accuracy guess im better then a gm now 😂😂😂
And someone said that forced moves still give you accuracy. Like blocking a check or moving your king under check with one move. most of my games are bad becaus I am bad, but I have had 90%+ accuracy simply being forced around the board after a book opening and one or two big time blunders.
How could they cheat with only one second per move? They just played well
programs has existed for decade to automatically play or show the best move for you while you're playing, one second of thinking for an engine like stockfish is a lot of thinking, but if the moves were not played automatically, humans wouldn't have the time to see the engine move and play it with the mouse for 5 moves in a row under 1s with no increment.
That's the danger of accusing of cheating then it's everywhere, and while kramnik completely lost his mind with cheating accusation, well out of every reports he made some of them probably were right.
I'm a 2100 lichess bullet player myself and at the end, kramnik took his time to play the knight move, giving opponent time to think as well, after the rook sac, white's moves are a bit easier to come up with, this is not obvious cheating at all
Dude u can beat Magnus in TT starting with 3;00 and finishing with 3;30 not even being in front of ur pc just start auto run with no delay and bot gonna do every top engine move in 0.1 sec ^.^
Yes, i guess it's cheat user.
This is how most of "clever" cheaters playing:
1) playing without computer assistance or only few moves with assistance
2) get losing position / low time
3) playing instant best moves in a seconds
4) winning the losing position because of pure chess skills
:)
CRYIMNIK
О, май херт..
He should start using cat instead of a mouse if it can make him a bit faster and stop his rant.
Kramnik is paranoid but I got to say that he probably is right with this IM
So what is your reason to approve that? I've never seen this player before. He played in the end of the game quite well. but what else?
Played this guy many times in 1+0, no indication that he's ever cheated. He's strong in time scrambles due to bullet experience
@@tactixianchess1409 so bullet experience means only best computer approved moves?
And why is he right?
@@Мама-анархия playing five perfect moves in a row in a fraction of a second is cheating, even magnus couldnt do that
What a joke of a player. No competitive pride
Читеров там много. На секундах играет с идеальной точностью. Крамник разочаровал тем, что курит.
Cheating has made online chess completely invalid!
how irritating a person can be..
this clown here - yes🤡
lovely commentary too, Hikaru is so annoying.
The only player who can beat Kramnik is a cheater.
I mean he does have a point. For 3 minutes it was slight advantage kramnik, then with 5 seconds left he crushed him playing the best moves. Like this IM 100% cheats
you can't really use an engine and make fast moves, can you
@@WallJumpGaming yes there are chrome extensions that auto play for you, didn’t you watch nakamura speed run bullet?? When he faced cheaters??
@@WallJumpGaming the eingine just shows the moves on the board, it's very very fast
Kramnick is a quack
@@attaxerp6335 Clowns that use chrome extensions get banned very quickly. This is the easiest type of cheating for the site to detect.
Although Kramink lost, he was cheating. Otherwise he wont last so long
Ngl he might be right about this one 😂😂😂
I doubt it Ameet won the British blitz championship in 2012, he's been rated over 2500 - but hasn't got his GM norms which is why he's still an IM.
@@blaser80finding the best move 10 times in a row with 1 second to think . This seems almost impossible even for players like magnus
Kramnik doesnt know how to play thats it.
Jospem will win over Kramnik....
Sounds like a skill issue
lmao
Too much cheating , including some top rate player and youtubers likes to cheat online for $.
Just retire bro. You've had a great career, but you're making a fool of yourself.
Жаль что Крамник курит эту дрянь!!!!!
Another cheat, amazing all the best moves in less than a second obvious a cheat
Nah, the position was not hard at that point to play. Black rooks were clumsy and easy to move bishops in such a position.
yeah , he was just better with the mouse, online chess requires different skills than otb.
how is it possible to cheat technically if only a second left?
@@wurzelausc That is the exact question you will never get an answer from the wise guys like Kramink...
@@Szabby999 This IM is clearly not cheating in my opinion but there are programs that can input moves for you. It is defnitely possible to cheat with less than a second even, by simply pressing a button and toggling a bot
I cheat sometimes. The IM's play looks like something you get when you are cheating. The ratio of best to good/excellent moves in a fast game, for his rating, is suspicious.
Alright, it’s very clear to me now. I mean I would never find that move, even in classical, and he finds it instantly.
Vladimir “The Procedure” Kramnik- probably
Calls out all the IM's "best" moves while simultaneously glancing over his repeated shit moves that led to these "best" moves.
I feel bad for his mental health therapist, if he has one. I am also an old person, but unlike him, I understand the reality, that every generation is better than the previous one, especially when you don't know how to premove
When did he go from world champ to world bish?!?
Just quit chess