Thank you so much. It’s amazing how smart you are. I love ❤️ discussion about language because my favorite philosopher is my man Ludwig Wittgenstein even tho I only understand .00001% of what he said. But anything that analyzes language is therefore so appealing to me.
That's the band I play in (lead singer: my daughter, Melanie Luna-find her on Amazon Music, etc., as Melanie Bonevac), recorded live on May 12, 2019. You're hearing an instrumental break in a song called "There Will Be a Day." That's Alex Coke on sax.
Nice lecture, Professor! But isn’t “murder is wrong” able to be ethical both grammatically understood and otherwise (largely from a late Wittgenstein point of view)? As is said in your video, the surface grammar can be misleading, and the true sense of such a claim therefore leads to something like “No murder!”; on the other hand, we can just take the present grammatical structure-but this still can work ethically: imagine during a lecture on ethics, students are asked to give some ethical propositions; someone says “murder is wrong”; it’s clear to see that at this moment “murder is wrong” isn’t making any prescription or other non-descriptive claims-yet we all think this is a legal answer to the teacher’s question. That a sentence is ethical is more down to its particular “use,” I think?
GENEROSITY YEAAHHHHHHH
Thank you so much. It’s amazing how smart you are. I love ❤️ discussion about language because my favorite philosopher is my man Ludwig Wittgenstein even tho I only understand .00001% of what he said. But anything that analyzes language is therefore so appealing to me.
The intro music makes me think of Adrian Edmondson and Rick Mayal sitting on a bench.
Great video! Hello from London, UK
Hey, thanks!
Can we get a video on cognitiveism please
what is the name of your intro track ?
That's the band I play in (lead singer: my daughter, Melanie Luna-find her on Amazon Music, etc., as Melanie Bonevac), recorded live on May 12, 2019. You're hearing an instrumental break in a song called "There Will Be a Day." That's Alex Coke on sax.
Nice lecture, Professor! But isn’t “murder is wrong” able to be ethical both grammatically understood and otherwise (largely from a late Wittgenstein point of view)? As is said in your video, the surface grammar can be misleading, and the true sense of such a claim therefore leads to something like “No murder!”; on the other hand, we can just take the present grammatical structure-but this still can work ethically: imagine during a lecture on ethics, students are asked to give some ethical propositions; someone says “murder is wrong”; it’s clear to see that at this moment “murder is wrong” isn’t making any prescription or other non-descriptive claims-yet we all think this is a legal answer to the teacher’s question. That a sentence is ethical is more down to its particular “use,” I think?
What a snoozer
Can you make one about the Error theory
Good idea!
so doxastic attitudes?
great video! thank you
If by any chance you see this check my comment on your previous video I would love you opinion, I won't repost the essay here as to not spam you 😁
5:39
Also, this song
ruclips.net/video/1_xwnb3cymc/видео.html