L12.3 The Sum of Independent Continuous Random Variables

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @ygalel
    @ygalel 4 года назад +6

    Extremely easy to follow, thank you.

  • @fierydino9402
    @fierydino9402 2 года назад +1

    Oh a nice way of verifying! Thank you!!

  • @NotLegato
    @NotLegato 2 года назад

    this really clarified for me how to explicitly compute it, i was stuck for a while.

  • @育安張-z6l
    @育安張-z6l 2 года назад

    truly help me a lot

  • @truonggiangpham5805
    @truonggiangpham5805 3 года назад +1

    Helpful, thanks you!

  • @miaotan-sx6mv
    @miaotan-sx6mv 6 месяцев назад

    why f_{X+b}(x)=f_X(x-b)?(3:56) i can't understand.

  • @Khan0156
    @Khan0156 2 года назад

    why f_{y+3} (z|3) = f_{y+3}(z) ? (3:10)

    • @qwkutiub
      @qwkutiub 2 года назад

      Because X and Y are independent. f_{y+3} (z|3) gives you the probability of a certain Y+3 given a certain X, but actually the value X takes doesn't influence Y, so you can just drop it.

  • @ccmk05
    @ccmk05 5 лет назад

    How do you know that X and Z are independent? (I'm asking because they must be independent in order to use the multiplication rule)

    • @dohyun0047
      @dohyun0047 5 лет назад +1

      they must be dependent because once you know little ' x ' you can know little bit about what 'z' might be

    • @anantvats366
      @anantvats366 5 лет назад +4

      X and Y need to be independent

    • @nguyenanhtuan3380
      @nguyenanhtuan3380 4 года назад +2

      They're not independent. He didn't write f(X=x, Z=z) = f(X=x).f(Z=z) but f(X=x).f(Z=z | X=x).

    • @yaweli2968
      @yaweli2968 3 года назад

      You don’t always need two r.v’s to be independent to use the multiplication formula.independence does not always imply the marginals multiple, independence implies cov is 0 but opposite for cov isn’t true; and fy|x is same as fy and vice versa. Note that
      fy|x*fx(x)=f(x;y) if you have no information that x and y are ind or not. Now if you do, and they are ind, then the condition on y drops but nothing changes. So again, you don’t need x,y to be independent for the multiplication rule. Clearly z is dependent on x in this case. fz|x*fx(x)=f(x;z)

    • @mabdulre9
      @mabdulre9 6 месяцев назад

      You have to Let's Suppose

  • @prashantbist5228
    @prashantbist5228 5 лет назад

    Can I get the full solution of the following question by today
    The Safe Grad Committe at a high school is selling raffle tickets on a Christmas Basket filled with gifts and gift cards.The prize is valued at $1200,the Committee has decided to sell 500 tickets only.What is the expected value of a ticket?If the students decide to sell tickets on three monetary prizes -one valued $1500 and two valued $ 500 each,what is the expected value of ticket now?

    • @AZTECMAN
      @AZTECMAN 4 года назад +1

      The expectation of a payout is equal to the sum of the weighted probability of each outcome -
      A) Since we have 1/500 chance of getting $1200 and 499/500 chance of getting $0, our expected value (what we would get on average, buying one ticket per year, every year) is 1200 * 1/500 + 0 * 499/500 which is equal to $2.40. Notice that this is the same amount that the committee should charge per ticket in order to break even - assuming all 500 tickets are sold.
      B) if we add up 1500 * 1/500 + 500 * 1/500 + 500 * 1/500 + 0 * 1/500, it can be seen plainly that we are getting 1/500 * (1500 + 500 + 500) overall. In other words, since our outcomes are equally likely, we can just sum together the different amounts and divide by 500... so our final answer is 2500 / 500 or $5. It should be observed that the decision of the committee to give one prize of a large amount or several smaller prizes doesn't effect the expected value of a ticket. Only when we increase the value of the total prize money does the expected value of a ticket increase.