What will happen with Andrew Huberman, now?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- The world's most famous neuroscientist manipulated at least half a dozen women, promoted fake science, doesn't appear to actually run a lab at Stanford and is making millions shilling supplements. I knew him before he was famous and have a few insights into who he really is.
New York Magazine Piece: nymag.com/inte...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @sgcarney
Get Exclusive Updates on Patreon:
/ sgcarney
Substack
sgcarney.subst...
Scott Carney Investigates Podcast
www.scottcarne...
RUclips / @sgcarney
Books:
The Wedge
www.scottcarne...
What Doesn't Kill Us
www.scottcarne...
The Enlightenment Trap
www.scottcarne...
The Vortex
www.scottcarne...
The Red Market
www.scottcarne...
Listen to the Scott Carney Investigates Podcast on:
RUclips
• Scott Carney Investigates
Apple:
podcasts.apple...
Spotify:
open.spotify.c...
Anchor:
spotifyanchor-...
Social Media:
Instagram / sgcarney
Facebook / scottcarneyauthor
Twitter / sgcarney
Bluesky staging.bsky.a...
#hubermanlab #hubermanlabpodcast #coldexposure #breathofthewild #science #NSDR #yoganidra #metoo #consciousness #neuroscience
©PokeyBear LLC (2023)
Get Exclusive Updates on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=82207370
Newsletter on Substack: sgcarney.substack.com/
New York Magazine piece (open in incognito to get around paywall) nymag.com/intelligencer/article/andrew-huberman-podcast-stanford-joe-rogan.html
Medical community is jealous of some of their peers getting fame and admiration.
Bro, let it go! He probably flaked of you coz he thought you were a nerd. Go to the gym, get some chicks, then maybe he'll wanna go shark diving with you 😂
Why are u even alive to waste your life like this
You’re the one who needs to be cancelled for polluting with disinformation.
It's a larger character flaw to plug one's own products on a video trying to ruin another person's career than anything the video accuses Huberman of.
8 months ago I went cold turkey and quit alcohol and my life has changed in ways unimaginable to the mind. Andrew's podcast on alcohol was a big wake up call and the reason why I quit alcohol . I will forever be grateful for him ..
Two things can be true at once.
Grateful and disgusted are both appropriate.
I did not need a podcast to wake up, I needed Andrew Huberman to wake up and I strongly believe most organizations and doctors could also use some help from him to really learn the hidden and pernicious effects that alcohol has on human body and brain.. You see mate, this is the power of the Internet revolution where specific knowledge could be found if you know where to look.. But it won't mean much to you probably because you still live in the 80s world where you think doctors and organizations hold the key to certain answers while many of us use this revolution to enrich our lives to become better in every aspect of life. @@Rusty69-er
Great job, proud of you. Whatever it takes👌👌👌
@@Rusty69-er Free Rusty?
@@a.l.1004 I love watching "The Maury Show" it shows, most women don't even know who the father is while married. Don't be one sided....Everyone has to be responsible who they choose to be part of their life. And, If doesn't work/or their assessment skill is off, they need to learn to move on.
What "fake science" did he promote? All I see in this video are accusations on his character rather than his craft.
he does promote fake science. For example he was twisting hair-loss science in order to make the products he was advertising in the video more marketable. I stopped watching his videos after I noticed him spouting nonsense and having weak scientific standards.
@@pupper5580 “twisting hair loss” explain? The only thing he really talks about hairloss is finistride, Kyle gillet came on the show and said “maybe topical coffee” and lowering dht can bell with hair loss but he doesn’t recommend because it is our main androgen. So what exactly did he say about it that’s innacurate?
@@pupper5580 his main sponsorship is Ag1. And they have nothing to do with hair loss. Not even a little bit
@@ellijahsnowwis13 he had a 3 hour show on hair loss
@@pupper5580 yea I saw it. It was mostly coming from what Kyle gillet said when he was on there. Andrew just spilled out in more detail what Kyle said from a previous episode. So what exactly did Andrew say that was wrong. I’m a big watcher of Kyle to. Kyle is also a MD. And all of the papers Andrew interpreted are all in the Shownotes. So if you slips up you can literally look up the exact study he’s taking it from. So what did he say exactly ??
Booo. Journalist? You basically just shared opinionated accusations with no actual facts or basis of what he's done wrong other than hurt your feelings. Seems like you are the one trying to ride his clout and this minor attention spike for your own personal attention and power gain. All I hear from this video is that Andrew had the kindness to invite you to do multiple things, and because he is a top dog and has an extremely busy schedule and cancelled on you, you are leaning into tearing down his whole character and tarnishing all the facts he has presented. Did you take the initiative to plan and invite him to anything, or were you just leeching off him without providing any value?
You need to learn to listen with your brain instead of your ego.
@@sgcarney same to you, sir.
@@benbollinger3183, I too can have the kindness to invite you to all kinds of incredible places and then cancel at the last minute or the day before, or simply ghost you. Also, they had an agreement on the book, and what Huberman said on the phone, if Scott related it correctly, is how a narcissist would behave. I laughed at the op sec.
Honestly... I only see personal attacks and bruised egos.
When you see Andrew Huberman speaking live (see just released in Melbourne, AU), his dedication and selflessness in his teachings with rigorous vulgarising and sourcing, it's hard to discredit all of his work for some private stories.
Crafting hours of content at that pace and of that length and quality is a huge task, I don't have his team, but I already struggle to release a 20-minute video/week!
And the content is FREE! Yes, there are sponsors and levers to monetise, and the company must be making millions, but it is simply the law of digital scalability.
The Huberman Lab transforms lives.
Ask people how were the greatest minds of this world to live with or be around, Males AND Females!
People are not perfect- duh.
If he does or did anything against the law: Then seize the law.
If he does anything incorrect in the private sphere: Communicate in private, make up or cut the bridge.
If he is being scientifically inaccurate: Open a scientific dialogue and/or seize the relevant commission.
If you're jealous of his success: make yourself useful.
But, please, especially Americans, stop this systematic media lynching.
In my country this would be undoubtedly sued for Public Defamation.
Betrayal can infict a trauma that damages the brain and cause PTSD symptoms......if he is cheating then it matters to some listeners who are aware of the health issues this can cause. Andrew has chosen to be a public figure.
You don’t get PTSD from someone cancelling plans a couple times, or from an argument over the phone. I wish people wouldn’t throw around PTSD so much, it renders it meaningless.
I thought Huberman’s Melb presentation was one of the worst speaking events I’ve ever seen, if not the worst. It seemed like he didn’t prepare one bit to speak to all 5400 of us, so disappointing
Big time bruised egos.
He ghosted him. Sounds like this guy fell I. Love with him. It was totally because he was famous. What a loser.
This is so shallow and full of subjectivity. Why would you bother doing this video with such petty examples?
Suggesting Scott shouldn't add his experiences and perspective is odd.
How is it being petty when the guy massively flaked on him multiple times. He went and got scuba certified so they could do this trip together, and then Huberman just canceled on him last minute. It's super shitty behavior.
Fr fr
It’s crazy how so many people fall under the spell of narcs and then actively shame people who speak out against them. He is reporting on his direct experience with Huberman and was treated very badly by him, saw a lot of disturbing behavior, there’s nothing petty about it.
THIS is what makes humans so scary. Somehow idolizing narcissists leads otherwise completely normal people to lose empathy and acting psychopathic.
Very scary stuff. If you ever wonder how the Nazis were a thing, this is the mechanism.
Please stop your nonsense
Man crush was not reciprocated....💔
Maybe we should stop putting people on pedestals. Especially those who become famous on the Internet.
There are 10s of thousands scientists who never attempt to explain scientific information to laypeople so shame the few that do.
Agreed. We are all flawed.
That would be a healthy mindset.
Bravo!! I have spoke about this to people over and over....no point.
@@RockstahRolln I'm not religious but it's in the bible, Don't make idols.
With respect, it’s challenging to disregard the inherent bias here, when your book is being promoted in the background and you’ve pinned a link to your Patreon. It may be dampening your message otherwise. I keep asking the question: why does any of this matter to folks who aren’t considering a relationship w/ him? Why is it so seemingly important for folks like you and NY Mag to take him down a peg (or, am I incorrect about that presumption)? Did people see Huberman as some sort of Christian ideal, and is all of this introducing cognitive dissonance against whatever puritanical ideals those folks have? I’m not personally seeing why any of these details matter when evaluating the quality of his output. As far as I’ve been able to parse, limited to no correlation is made between the flakiness in his personal life and any parallel egregiousness on his part in a professional context.
I am sorry that you were manipulated, and I certainly am not signing up to be friends w the guy. But I’d argue that Andrew’s communication and research has moved the world forward, and I’m not seeing why anything reported on has material public relevance - to the degree that’s worth discrediting his work as a researcher.
Consequently, it’s hard to move past perceiving the fiscal opportunity here as the primary motivation for any of this (or perhaps a personal revenge/justice need). I’m honestly not attacking your motivations here per se, over trying to understand them … as it’s probably very possible that I’m misunderstanding the intent, and/or that it’s lost on me altogether.
Is it strange for an author to put their books on display? Should authors tell no one about their work? What do you think authors do? AS for your question: do you think someone with bad character in three domains (friendship/sex/professionalism) would not have bad character or motivations in their public persona? Is it better for journalists to not tell you information about people they report on?
Thanks for the reply. No, it’s not strange at all! Which is why I was pausing to jump to that conclusion. My point was that I was personally failing to see the motivations otherwise (possibly ignorance on my part), in which case it may be difficult for me and others to ignore the *possible* fiscal bias inherent. And that this might be getting in the way of your actual intention here. Fwiw, I’m generally pro capitalism… mostly. But, yes, I would see something wrong with fiscal remuneration being the primary motivator for feeding a hit piece on him (not saying that’s the case here).
I realize I’m likely playing out some unreasonable fantasy of what I seek from journalists, but I do think clarity of motivations and purpose are important to promulgate clearly, especially in cases like these. Otherwise, it becomes too easy to dismiss as tabloid fodder - which I’m not saying this is necessarily, but in reading the comments it seems fair to say that several folks are either maligned to or misunderstanding your motivations.
As for whether correlation in some areas equals correlation in others, my opinion is: we have to be VERY careful of glib associative correlation in today’s climate, especially when the interwebs have effectively become a court of public opinion with its own power to indict w sizable implications. In this case - not just for Andrew, but for all of the folks who have gotten legit value from his content.
So, my “fantasy” is that journalists should bear the burden of making such correlations explicit vs implicit. That’s the journalism I want. If there is an issue there, I want more of a focus on the speciousness of his reasoning, or lapses /dubiousness in scientific rigor. NYMag did not successfully do this (unless I missed it), or at best they presented it as ancillary to the personal stuff. The salient thing on display here is his infidelity and flakiness. Maybe it’s just the world I’m coming from… but philandering, absent minded professors are not an Edvard-Munch-worthy anomaly in my experience. I’m not excusing the behavior, just questioning its news-worthiness to the general public.
Huberman can speak in ways that make complex subjects colloquial for us pleebs, often going for 3 hours straight as a one-direction, info dense monologue. But he does markedly less well when being interviewed by others. Should there be a correlation there? Just because he’s a bit on the spectrum when talking himself, does that mean his podcast is any less credible or authoritative? I’d say “no”.
Again, I’m not questioning your (or NYMs) credibility here - just struggling to understand the purpose and why it should matter to us.
P.S. For the record, I’m not an Huberman acolyte - just sensitive to our standards for these increasingly ubiquitous hit pieces, and our collective ability to hold people as the often contradictory multitudes we are. Babies mistaken for bath water are abound.
@@8033y I’m curious about how you can call someone’s careful juggling of half a dozen smart, ambitious, successful women for years - each believing she was his exclusive partner- mere philandering.
This wasn’t simply an occasional lack of fidelity to one partner. The man spread HPV (can cause cancer). He robbed multiple women of the last of their childbearing years, and was allegedly also abusive.
There will be more reporting for sure. The story compounds across several reports. There is only so much that can be done with 8000 words.
@@MeloniousThunk Yep yep. I’m not disputing the claims; personally speaking, I’d be really upset with him if any of those things happened to me. E.g. The knowing, undisclosed spread of HPV is certainly something to investigate further - and I’d encourage those folks to do so if there is a substantive/legit claim. But, in my admittedly limited PoV at least … those are matters that should ideally be worked out between the wronged and Andrew, or in a courtroom where appropriate. Arbitrating this via media channels, given the inevitable sensationalism+overreaction they tend to trigger, feels heavy handed and clumsy in this case to me… and, seemingly, more in the spirit of inciting outrage than correcting a problem per se.
Fwiw, I’m not an avid Huberman follower, but when I do listen to his podcast, I do so for the information… not because I’m considering a relationship w/ him.🤔🙂
It’s sorta the age old “hate the artist, love the art” thing.
Totally fair for you to disagree in any case; I do sympathize with why many people are morally offended. I’m mostly commenting on the role of the press/media in cases like this. Especially given potential conflict of interest inherent, it feels important to align on what we are collectively attempting to achieve; we should encourage our journalists to focus more on accurately outlining causal factors, what needs to be fixed and a plan for fixing it - and less on the symptomatic soap opera of it all to feed our insatiable needs for titillation and outrage in perpetuity (which, I’ll be the first to admit, I’m fully guilty of engaging in here! 😇)
"He basically ghosted me for 18 hours..." 🤣🤣🤣 At this point I can see why.
So is ghosting actually a norm nowadays? Ignoring is one of the cruelest types of psychological abuse
Na for real 😂
He did it before any of this had happened.
@@masia6255you don't have to give your precious time to someone you don't want to, you should prioritize your own peace and mental health even if that means ignoring or staying away from someone
@@davidflorez1196 No one says you have to spend your time with someone you don't want but you have to communicate so that the person is aware that they should make different plans, otherwise you show disrespect to the time and well-being of another person. So ridiculous people can't follow simple norm of respect and justify abusive behavior. You don't want to do something - just communicate - it's super easy.
His dog just laid there? Even *he* didn't entertain you? Dude, pull yourself together!!! Your resentment has consumed you! You are out of control and making a fool of yourself because everyone sees right through you! You should be grateful to Huberman if he doesn't sue you, but he probably doesn't have the time, as he is productive and in high demand and is likely not as small and petty.
Lol.. The dog part was so funny😂😂
I assume Costello was doing the normal dog thing and did not really do an effort to read your manuscript. In Germany there is a saying: business is business and Schnaps is Schnaps. I think this is under the category Schnaps. And might I suggest, should remain there. RIP Costello.
How about all his guests? His guests seem real, professional, experienced and knowledgeable!
Especially Zuckerberg. :D
@@greenlitlleman Z. is a very successful businessman. Very, very, very!!! What's you point, tho?
Those people have done other interviews with more reputable people. Just go there.
@@DejectedCat like who? I would actually love to know some reputable sources for stuff like what huberman does. The problem is almost every doctor/qualified medical person on social media who has a big enough reputation always has a criticism, and the smaller creators just aren't famous enough for people to spend time criticising them. The average local doctor is also probably even less educationally qualified than those famous youtubers and is just as much subjected to the same issues and things like pseudoscience beliefs, except that they do not have such a huge reputation of loyal audience. (seeing a real doctor is ofc better since you can get diagnosed personally and lots of other things but im just pointing out that nobody can be perfect and every medical thing on youtube big enough always ends up getting criticism)
Personally I think he is a trained CIA asset. No joke.
I COULDN’T GET PAST HIS NEVER ENDING SALES PITCHES AND COMMERCIALS
Dude says Huberman promotes pseudo science to make money and then he contributes to a hit piece on him to make money. I prefer the scientists over this goofy guy. Bummer that he left him hanging a couple times. It sounds like he is really upset and found a way to get a big story.
How much money do you think I make on this video?
@@sgcarneyit’s painstakingly clear it turned out to be much less than you had hoped for
@@sgcarney
159.660 views so far. So I wouldn't complain if I were you.
@@sgcarney not as much as Huberman, that's for sure lol.
I see you got burned by Huberman in the past by him flaking on you and maybe affecting a book sale, but to me it seems more like you need to see a therapist rather than just trash the guy to oblivion. You say he’s manipulating his audience like he did you. It just comes across as someone who is a little butthurt. No offense as I would be too. Maybe he was super busy, stressed and overwhelmed by certain pressures at the time. Maybe he thought you might write something negative about your existence with him.
Maybe , he thought you were using him, instead just being a friend. Maybe this is why he spoke about not caring about your journalism, but to simply be a friend. He could have had serious worry and trust issues about you. Could be a million different explanations rather than just “He’s manipulative and controlling.”
Like you said 9 mins in.. This is your opinion of him. Your interpretations of experiences could be extremely mislead. I'm seeing a sad story of rejection here. He spends his time translating science to positively impact peoples lives who need it, you're a journalist..
Andrew isn't great w the science. Lots of debunking has been done.😊
@@janicelgo4522 Really? Could you tell me what specifically? Usually people don't establish and maintain professorship and research lead roles when they are.... "debunked" Also I would take a minute to notice that this video spearheads into a book promo and is a grab at monetization and views.
@@janicelgo4522 of what exactly? he presents the science and suggests a protocol. the topics he covers are very varied and relevant. if there are things that are controversial, he would usually say this. I've not enjoyed every podcast but find most are very useful if relevant to the listener. due to the balance in his presentation.
The fact that I've lost a friend over an argument about Huberman makes it even sadder than it already is.
I appreciate and have applied much of Huberman's advice towards leading a healthier lifestyle. I'm happy if he makes money- good for him! Humans are all flawed. What goes on in his personal life does not discredit him, in my opinion.
I think you’re trying to monetise here on your old mate here. ‘Your book is out’? No way!
true, this guy is slippery and knows what is doing - cringe
I know exactly what Scott is talking about. My ex husband is a double board certified physician/surgeon with a pretty impressive CV. There are many parallel similarities in what Scott is describing in what happened with my relationship. Because he was also a respected academic, no one could imagine or believe what was really happening. He was so well protected because of his credentials that no one bothered to look deeper.
@user-sj5ju4jb7t It's convenient to dismiss someone as bitter because it somehow diminishes your hero Huberman. I only made the comment to let others know that yes these things do in fact happen. Somehow guys like these become untouchable because of their credentials. You see the public side not the personal side. For me it had nothing to do with sleeping around.
Ok I’m embarrassed for you. this should have been a private voice mail that you left for him. while crying.
I’m glad he is being called out. I’m an academic and I’ve come across a lot of covert narcissists just like Andrew. They are affiliated with world-class universities and use their position to take advantage of women.
Continue to call these men out; the culture has got to change.
funniest video of a grown-up man wining about not becoming Huberman's friend. LOL. Literally wtf
And blowing navy op sec while failing to do so. Hilarious.
In all honesty I don't care. I only went to him for medical advice and recommendations, not for morality.
He’s not a medical doctor.
@@sgcarneymost medical doctors are operating off of biased and outdated knowledge.
@@sgcarney Huberman is an associate professor of neuroscience at the Stanford School of Medicine and is the lab director for one of their labs. Medical doctors are not the only source of medical advice. Countless researchers all over the world contribute to the medical literature and are not “medical doctors”
@@sgcarney what kind of response is that? Medical doctors base their entire practice on research by people like Andrew and some of his guests.
You are telling people that milk comes from the milk man, not the cow.
Why would you go to a professor of opthamology for medical advice?
He’s just not that into you
All of this started with an anonymous woman making charges against him. This is what Joe Rogan discovered. ruclips.net/user/shortsw2KAdUBuZ-Y
He got into a lot of women by lying.
The whole video got that vibe. It's just weird. Pushing plans that involve going on vacations with a dude you barely really know and then getting surprised when the plans got cancelled. Maybe those plans should have never been set up to begin with. He's talking about Huberman in personal terms but he doesn't really know the guy beyond those weird attempts to befriend the guy for whatever reason. He should definitely knock it off unless he has some serious claims to do about Huberman as a professional, not as a person he barely knows
@@2Sugarbearsso what ? Who are you his mom ?
It’s incredible the amount of energy used for wrongdoing to people online!
How petty is this!
You’re lucky RUclips hides the dislike count 😂
It's 1/3 disliked and 2/3 likes. Now you know.
😂😂😂
@@sgcarneynah
It’s at 2.5k dislike
2.2 likes / 2.6 dislikes
This makes you look like a bitter ex girlfriend
Im sorry for your bromance breakup.
I AGREE. I THINK IT'S ABOUT TIME HE GETS OVER IT. THERE IS MORE FISH IN THE SEA (PLENTY OF SHARKS, THAT IS...) 🤣🤣🤣
That’s the vibe I’m getting too. Scott wanted to be Andrew’s bestie, but it wasn’t meant to be….😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂
lolol this is pure comedy, "he ghosted me!!!"
@@justingarner5425 Huberman was cheating him with Lex
After watching the whole video; i have to agree with this.
You badmouth your ‘old-friend’…
Huberman sounds like a terrible friend, according to this story. I mean, inviting someone to your house and then not showing up for 18 hours? Especially when they fly out for you.
@@hyperadapted you mean someone who had a personal relationship with Huberman and is explaining his past experiences with him? I would consider possibly believing this guy, knowing that he actually had real experiences with Huberman. It's more than what you or I could ever assume, considering we've never had any kind of real experiences with him.
@@hyperadapted just because somebody isn't as famous as Huberman doesn't mean they're any less credible. In situations like this, there is usually at least some truth to what is going on when so many people are calling Huberman out. If that's not the case, then it becomes a conspiracy theory. I'm less likely to opt for conspiracy theories.
@@hyperadapted Huberman is also a rando on the internet, why do you believe him? Because he got a big number under his profile picture?
I've learned there are 3 sides to EVERY story your side, their side and the TRUTH! But when did people start thinking successful RUclipsrs, Smart Savy Entrepreneurs were some sort of Saints in their everyday life? this Just sounds like a jealousy nobody might be able to up his views by just mentioning someone that is obviously everything he wanted to be when he grew up but didn't quite make it
I don’t see Huberman as being addicted to manipulating people, I see him as someone who is honestly trying to have a positive impact on people’s lives, and he is addicted to the idea that perhaps his work might be doing just that, helping people. To me, he seems like someone who not only believes in what he is professing, but also as someone who does his best to live by what he teaches in regards to the tools he promotes to shift Biology. Okay, maybe he hasn’t been perfect in his personal life, but who among us is perfect? Okay, perhaps he is quite masculine and has a weakness for women, yeah, he’s a man, and honestly, I think that’s why he’s being attacked! The media does not care for strong, confident, physically healthy, mature men. Tough, I’m sticking with Huberman. He’s helped me a lot, and I’m grateful for his hard work and dedication to helping others.
Anyone who knows people in academia and their experiences will not be surprised by this revelation.
Or any other kind of authority figure.
I know many academics who are thoughtful, highly moral, highly intelligent, love teaching their subjects, and are very honest and open minded. Most of the best avoid appearing on social media and just do their work and write books on their research. A fallen social media guru has little to do with most professionals in his profession or the world of academia. And yes, I am not surprised by this revelation because I am not surprised that social media is full of hypocrites, conspiracy theorists, and keyboard warriors who love to hear themselves degrade others.
@@rabukan5842 I know many instances, where younger female students have an affair or a like going on with their older male professor, tutor, principal to make sure their grades are on point!! Almost standart procedure, sad but true...
I am an academic. It is very easy to get oversubscribed. I imagine this aspect of Huberman's life, and perhaps additionally an ADHD personality contributes to all the stories shared here? Like
@MessyThinker, my thought process was immediately - oversubscribed academic who developed a bad habit... got used to promising way more than he gets to.
@@CarbonIceland I thought ADHD as well. But I mean, the sheer amount of scheduling and the fact he kept it up for so long made me question it a bit hahahahha
Not even a fan just interested because it is hyped news. You barely knew him and weren't his friend. Fuck plans fall out with adults regularly even among tight friends. You definitely had no problem adding to a hit piece despite having no relationship to offer perspective and now you have something to post for the algorithm 😂. Sounds like a journalist.
Huberman is a brilliant scientist and excellent communicator for great causes. He has become famous for good reason which unfortunately shoves him into the limelight. Most other people in the world who are not famous are allowed to be different people privately. Infact in some careers that is encouraged. It sounds like you need to privately communicate with him about your hurt feelings and sort it out, rather than slamming him publicly without the ability to defend himself.
How do you know he is a "brilliant scientist"? Also he has every ability to defend himself in public. Indeed he is doing it now with a very expensive PR firm.
This dude sounds like a disgruntled ex girlfriend. A bunch of assumptions makin him sound like the bad guy
All of this started with an anonymous woman making charges against him. This is what Joe Rogan discovered. ruclips.net/user/shortsw2KAdUBuZ-Y
He broke the hearts of 6 woman who believed he loved them. If this was your sister would you be so callous?
@@2Sugarbearsyou don't know if he told the women that they were just the only one
I don't know anything about either of you but this video comes across like your feelings are hurt by him being unreliable and potentially not sharing the same level feelings of friendship. This all seems a bit childish, but it sure was a good opportunity to advertise that book.
Right. It’s hard not to ghost while working in research either 😂
ikr I only superficially know about Huberman, who he is and what he does. the algorithm sent me this video and honestly its the biggest whiney cry-baby thing I've seen since I turned the orange jesus off teevee.
@@johnhannah9982, that's the liberal logic. You can treat "bad people" howewer you want, and only "good people" should be respected and have rights.
Let the man be; his private life is irrelevant. What matters is that he's an excellent educator.
Sounds like you're secretly in love with Huberman.
and maybe Huberman was with him, that's why he kept cancelling the dates
Its none of anyones business. What he says in his podcasts is separate from his private life.
I agree. People shouldn't be so easy to control with low level smear campaigns.
I agree but he makes a lot of claims about things he's not expert enough. Claims that he shares as fact that his listeners take as fact because he has the letters Dr. in front of his name.
So if anyone lives a secret double life if doesn't matter? Think of a person you value. If they deceived you, lied about another personal life, it's separate and who cares?
@@ktm12798 Should any single man who is not married be internationally disgraced for being a player?
No it's not. He's selling himself and his personal and professional experience on that podcast as a man of probity and integrity. Turns out, it's just spin and marketing. That's the problem with using the podcast medium to make a living as opposed to being a private professional.
If you can no longer attack the point, you attack the person.
His science communication has been called out extensively.
@sgcarney Not every one person is perfect. And if he gets 1 out of 10 things wrong is it okay to go behind personal life ? If you want to follow that logic then take a look at your own comments and like to dislike ratio and take your own advice and do better . It's kind of pathetic
@@sgcarney I’m a physician and have been listening to him for years. His analysis of the science is thoughtful and not hyperbolic
@@sgcarney You seem to take no accountability to some pretty fair critiques on your poor and pretty take.
🤔🧐 Another Fake J.Lo...Just Kitten 😹🐈Meow! Meow...Lol!!! 😅🤣😂@@sgcarney
I think we can all agree that the moral of this story (provided it’s true) is to not put people up on a pedestal. People are people, and they often suck. I don’t think he deserves to lose everything, but I also don’t think people should view him as a role model or anything.
Agreed.
@@Xrre343k7a3s I’d argue that it is relevant to his listeners. They deserve to know that the person who’s giving them tips on how to optimize their life is also capable of great manipulation and deceit.
True
Yes. Never look up to anyone, never look down on anyone.
@@AnnSmajstrla what about the personal lives of doctors and lawyers and ministers and teachers and elected officials......if it isn't illegal...then what? There are too many a-holes 'influencing' people to hold them accountable for their personal lives. Has Huberman claimed to be a nice, good guy???? If not, then, he isn't fooling anyone, because he didn't claim it to begin with.
Is this the New Yorker or an OK Gossip Mag, hit piece? Charismatic academic has "fanboys & fangirls" So what if he's overextended or cheats on girlfriends? Have we grown a generation of whiny jealous journalists who fret about their "relationships" with famous podcasters? If you want to critique his "science" do that, but drop personal attacks.
I think its more about the narcissism and the lying and the deceptive behavior.
The key in the article is the studies he never actually performed and made up. The studies where his data is provably false. Otherwise, I don't care about his personal life. I have heard from people within the industry who are PhD's and know how to carry out clearly documented studies. They're both well known people who are go to scientists worldwide. I wouldn't have clicked on this had they not separately brought this guy up last year being a total fraud. One described him as an internet created life guru. I hadn't followed Huberman (sp?) at all, so noticed this and watched.
I think the women care, my dude
@@akshayde what is the deal that he has no active lab etc? has all of this come out with his :"women "issues or were they always there. Hell I followed his protocols and went to see a lecture by him. One thing was a red flag in that.....which made me ponder (re women)
My only takeaway from that hit job is that while it is ok and encouraged for women to juggle multiple partners, it is not ok for famous men to do the same and should be publicly shamed for it, according to "journalists"
I' m from Denmark and have to say that Susanna Søberg is not just a blogger, she is a researcher and a author
hmmm, have you read her 'study' on cold/heat exposure and how it's basically... nothing? I did and the many conclusions and the so-called 'principle' is simply baseless
The real problem is that people follow, they don't study...
Huberman often leads people to study though. There are so many things I learned on those podcasts and then dug really deep. There are things he discusses which have also changed my life. As in I went from lying in bed everyday for half the day for 7-9 years and now I do crossfit. i was in bed due to autoimmmune, Im not in remmision but close.
@@jontschoeman2667 that's inspirational.. lead yourself to study though no one can beat what comes from within..
@@jontschoeman2667 that's it
@@jontschoeman2667how did you discover autoimune was the problem and what did you do?
I'm sorry bro but looking at The Wim Hof thing and then this. And then looking at the amount of views you get. It's possible Huberman is not a good person. But it's also very likely that you are neither. Where does the whole "he derives pleasure from manipulating people" come from? Is it maybe your feelings were hurt and you project your insecurities as that? A bit shady that you throw shade on everyone you interview like this
Well I have been applying the "fake science" he shares and it radically changed my life in positive ways.
This is the kind of thing I don't like to see on social media
Everything you said is relevant, his fans in here are coping with his character.
truth
Huberman's fans are all repeating the same three or four talking points. If RUclips allowed that and I was the author, I would remove all the repetition and summarize them in a pinned comment. Would make for a very short and easily read comments section. Those are 1) you can't stand rejection, 2) you're promoting your book, 3) you're just envious and 4) nobody's perfect, therefore no criticism is ever valid, and 5) you aren't perfect either, and because two wrongs make a right, Huberman is good.
This just seems like a more upscale version of taking “we should do lunch sometime!” too seriously and then trying to back someone in a corner over it. Social pleasantries ≠ friendship. Multiple evasions = “no.”
It seems you’re forgetting the part where Huberman was the one scheduling these outings in the first place and telling Scott to get scuba lessons in preparation for their trip etc etc lol. If Andrew was just being pleasant I don’t think he would be telling him how to prepare and what to bring for a planned outing.
@@mechadonia prob realized Scott was weird over time.. if I stop being friends with someone for whatever reason , I’m not making a 10 min video about them. That’s weird asf.
@@ellijahsnowwis13 that would only be a plausible explanation if he had invited him out to one thing and then ghosted him. But he kept inviting him out multiple times and then ghosted him each time… obviously if you realized someone was weird the first time around you wouldn’t keep inviting them on trips right :/
@@mechadonia yea andrew definitely shouldn’t of done that. But this guy is clearly “weird” I’m sure he sensed that. Because who the heck makes a video on someone not being there friend. Especially when it’s nothing illegal or anything.
Has nothing to do with him being a scientist. Can be a “bad person” and still be amazing scientist… it’s not correlated…
sigmund freud didn’t seem like a good person at all and yet a lot of the Dm models for psychiatrists are still used. What does it matter?
@@ellijahsnowwis13 idk if sigmund Freud tricked me into wasting thousands of dollars on scuba training for no reason I might make a RUclips video about it
This story is shaking the balls and ass of the neuroscience world!
I improved my life drastically thanks to A. Huberman! I will forever be grateful for all the information he has brought to the audience. Truth always comes out. I hope all you guys get the attention you cry for on his back, get to promote your nowhere near as helpful channels. Also hope the woman who posted the article gets her attention and 15 min fame too.
You need to get a life not a crush on Huberman
I don't know him but I do know that people with the cluster of adhd, depression, and perfectionism can be non-responsive like that and it actually tears them up inside. When it results in a blown deadline panic sets in. It's hard for the person affected by this to have much empathy because it affects them negatively. From the outside it looks like indifference but it might be being catastrophically overwhelmed. Prideful adhd people don't know how to ask for help and basically can't fix the situations themselves. It can be confused with vindictiveness too.
Not justifying, just describing.
I also thought it might be adhd- he has mentioned that he can only concentrate under specific conditions etc
Believe he’s said it himself on one of his RUclipss
“I used to have this friend and he wouldn’t accept my sexual advances, so….. “
Can't reconcile that Huberman is a no good, gigantic DB, so make up stupid shit...
Sounds like he'd do well as a politician!😮
He is a deep state shill who is now bei g taken down. Come on people read the signs ...get out of your hero worship
How does a Stanford professor with a weekly, three hour podcast have this much spare time to for all this?
He seems to don't have family and almost no friends. So therefore he has much time left
He is an energetic guy.... guess his protocols do work!
As the article says, he's mostly a grifter. He's not doing any actual research in his lab.
How does Elon Musk get to manage 4 or 5 companies at a time and still have time to do podcasts tweets documentaries and politics ?
Coke
I'm not surprised by your experience. There was something really off about the guy, based on the videos. Huberman is a cult of personality. That's what you're buying when you embrace him. Andrew Huberman has a personality disorder. He is toxic. The problem is that he's a smart and appealing character, so a lot of people like him, which makes him very much like Trump.
I think most smart people have voted for a lesser of two evils for decades now, but most dumb people think that everyone votes for the opposite candidate because they're bewitched extremists. It does not really concern me as a European. And I agree with you on Huberman.
dude stayed at his house for 18 hours my god haha
I know right. Wife "superman isn't in I'm afraid". Me, "okay sorry to bother you tell him I dropped by thanks". This journo camps out in the sitting room for a day and a night, presumably the kids are trying to watch the telly around him, then dinner gets served.. Ouch how painful is that.. Is he still just sitting on the sofa in the dark with his rucksack and fishing rod while the kids are eating dinner at the table. The wife is calling superman from. The bathroom saying.. "he's still fucking there, waiting in the dark your friends are a nightmare", superman "just be nice to him he's a journalist he will go away eventually"
I once had a very charismatic "friend", it was a full blown narcissist. My "friend" was like Huberman. I have now the capacity to recognise narcissist people, it's easy.
Charisma and charm are telltale signs, though not all charismatic people are narcissists. Good rule of thumb though. What else gives them away?
what helps you recognize?
@@sylwiapro2791- What else? I would say a lack of genuine interest in you, only an interest in your interest in them. It is so easy to have a narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) on the Internet.
I'd like to believe that I can but narcissists are all different.
Exactly, huberman always had a really fake "wholesome professional guy" kind of vibe. I never liked him.
I hope this is civil enough. I feel this is a long, winded personal attack under a click bait banner, suggesting that Andrew Huberman’s what continent is unuseful and erroneous. But the majority of the dialogue in this video is simply Scott complaining about Huberman, unprofessional and possibly unreliable behavior in their relationship. Or at least title this video as what it is “Andrew Huberman was a jerk to me“ and leave the man’s professional reputation alone.
Thank you for making this
I found the article hilarious considering I thought Huberman was gay for the longest time. Btw your pronunciation of his name is amusing, Hooberman lol.
His flakiness would've annoyed me too. I hate flaky people to the point I drop contact with them. The cheating and whatnot is definitely a problem though. You can't trust people like that.
But I watch his podcast not for him but the information. I enjoy most of the guests he has on, and I go on to follow them as well, such as Layne Nortan and Peter Attia
Layne Norton and Peter attia are both clear self centred bullies and are typical medical shills who co tinously ignore data that doesnt fit the standard. Andrew has had much better people on in my opinion
Yeah. I think it's a little weird that people put him on such a pedestal.
Most pathetic video I’ve sat through. I feel like you owe me 13 minutes of my life back… I thought you had something relevant to say.. but based off what you said it’s very clear he tried to make time for you as a friend, and your intentions were strictly to get a story out of him that you could sell. Him being upset at your story on him sounds about right given your pure intentions to cut him down and create that narrative of him. And big surprise the same thing happened with Wim Hof. It’s going to happen to everyone you chase because it’s you, not them. This post is the last bit of my time I’ll let you waste..
It would be unfortunate if he were a horrible person, I'd believe it. Nonetheless, his work and the research he funds speak for themselves. Anyone sucessfully using science to counter our current culture in medicine and reroute funds from big pharma to the wellness industry will be dragged like this.
Don't be naive. He is rerouting to the supplement and alternative medicine industry whose earnings rival that of big pharma and their products even less regulated. He also talks about topics he knows nothing about, and makes huge extrapolations based on animal studies. That's a troubling sign for a scientist.
Huber is funded by big pharam .. Wakey wakey...come on peiple this is classic deep state move
@@livulllmann8527 he has other experts come on his show and asks them questions.
Exactly. This smear is very covert and planned. I’m ok with being called a conspiracy theorist. I just say I have a conspiracy about you calling me a conspiracy theorist. There’s a big Koolade waterfall out there.
@@livulllmann8527are you obligated to buy AG1 ? Don't you think that going to the gym and getting good sleep is going to keep you healthy ? Because that is most of his podcasts
How unmanly is it to gossip about another man? Whatever he does in his personal life does not affect the quality of content he puts out.
It actually does. You have no way to verify what he says, so you need to be able to trust his character. Or take it into account while listening to him.
Respectfully it sounds like you’re in the wrong. A “true friend”, you, should have told Andrew he was in the wrong for ghosting you and that it wouldn’t be tolerated the next time. Then, if he does it again you cut him off. If you stick around for strikes two or three then maybe you love the drama. I say this with tough love.❤
I support women. Who cares if I'm a "true friend" or not? Toxic loyalty is not a value I hold dear.
We will still listen to Dr huberman
This reminds me of my aunt ranting about how bad the neighbor is for not putting the trash cans out in time....
I honestly don't see this negatively affecting Huberman's career in the longterm. He will go quiet, allow the scandal to fade , then return to relative normalcy within a few months. I think he has amassed enough of a devoted sycophantic fanbase ( e.g., "hubberman husbands") that they will continue listening to him devotedly while ignoring his troublesome private life. Separating a troubled individual from their work is understandable, but the problem with Hubermann is he often presented himself as an ultra optimized, empathetic, humble wellness guru who just wanted to help people.
You could well be right.
Personally I never trust anyone who doesn't drink alcohol ;-)
Boy, we should all be so glad that we don’t have hit pieces on ALL of us. EVERY SINGLE damn one of us is not perfect in someone’s eyes. Absolutely crazy for people to judge this guy based on zero information. I can promise you that despite the good relationships I have had over the years - many would critique me or tell me I didn’t treat them right at some point. Am I a bad person? No way. I’m imperfect, like the rest of us. Get over yourselves people.
@@grannygoes7882 ah yes, the old cliche take that we’ve heard a thousand times. I trust people who don’t drink far more than I do those that do. If you need booze to be your real self you’re sad.
Further more, I never entrust secrets to those who drink. Drinking makes everyone a talker. Less trust worthy with kids. The list goes on and on. Being raised by alcoholics and seeing how pathetic they and their alcoholic friends were, put it into a whole different perspective for me.
@@Stew_Pid OMG........I was making a joke. About the only drink of alcohol I have these days is a sip of wine at communion. But personally, I like drinkers better than non-drinkers. I like bars better than cafes. That is just me and probably because I was raised by totally neurotic teetotalers who really could have used a drink once in a while.
Nothing will happen. Women will still line up to sleep with him. Millions of guys will still listen to his podcast. Advertisers (after a brief break) will still advertise with him. I feel vindicated, but am sad that I didn't know how to monetize my intuition.
Agreed - your keen intuition is worth its weight in gold already.
Sure! Look at what happens when politicians are outed. But at least now those who are on the edge of being susceptible and haven't been fully drawn in yet have the support and validation they might need. To me, he's acting as a very powerful example for what happens when someone controls the f%$# out of everything in their experience. It supports with a collective shift, even if it's just a small one to start.
I think the pattern is becoming clear that when someone doesn’t support the plan for people being depressed they become victims of character slaughter. I’m so glad to see him back.
We probably all need to stop playing the victim, let’s get better at identifying people that treat us badly and quickly walk away, period.
How is literally identifying a harmful abuser "playing the victim"?
How would you feel if a guy lied about being exclusive and didn't use a condom? You'd feel assaulted.
I'm happy for these women that they found each other and I hope for all the best for them in their emotional recovery.
If he turned up after is it ghosting or was he busy? did you talk about his absenteeism/ghosting once he turned up and you went camping and staying at his house or is your airing it on youtube the first time it was brought up?
Sorry if I got it wrong but this sounds kinda off
We eventually went on a few day hikes on subsequent days. They were reasonably normal at that point.
It was a problem. But a personal one between him and me. It became publicly relevant when it was obviously part of a larger pattern of manipulation and paralleled what happened with the women.
This really seems like someone who had a crush on a celebrity. Celebrity got the ick and you didn’t get the hint and are now mad about being politely ghosted
lmao. Your timeline is off.
@@sgcarney lmfao. So you did have sexual interest in him after all?
@@ivokrushkov2674 he is saying andrew wanted him
😂😂
To me it seems like Andrew is and behaves like someone born with money and connections, so everything he has and does in life is have fun and worship his body. Whereas Scott thought Andrew and others work together because of shared interests. Not because they're having the same lifestyle, the same money and the same connections. Andrew did not ghost him politely. You're only twisting things and trying to insult, just like the majority of Andrew's fans here.
Brave of you. I always found him emotionally cold.
It's moderately terrifying to go public. Most people are too worried that Huberman will attack them for speaking out. For some reason I end up on the vanguard of these things.
@@sgcarneyyes, for some reason…hmm..
@@sgcarneyThis is why I am truly grateful to you for sharing this
He is very likely to trash you publicly and try to sue you. Be prepared.
My initial impression of the Hube was positive. After a few weeks, it was apparent his min-maxxing is pathological and absurd, and product shilling obsessive. Forums about him are a great source of comedy however.
I listened to his protocols and thought 'when does he have time to do any work?'
🤣
@@annekenney6914, I think he does not. To me it seems he's an actor born into money and this is the way he prefers to live his life.
If Scott Carney is truthful about Huberman, then I don't see a problem shedding some daylight on Huberman. Huberman is a strong, rich, successful guy, so he can take it. He won't be destroyed by this, which is a good thing, and this is interesting to watch.
I've been a follower of his podcast almost from the beginning and have gotten a lot out of it. He's always come across to me as someone very good-hearted and genuine so it was really hard to learn that he is quite different in reality. It's certainly disappointing. That said, I'm still not sure I understand the reason for the piece and why this info rises to the level of import for a story in NY Magazine. Something about reporting on and just tearing down someone with obvious mental health issues just seems off.
I think it’s because a lot of people follow what he suggests, assuming he has their best interests at heart and that he has the wisdom to guide them. He spreads a lot of misinformation I think and I think it’s important to understand that it’s not to help people, that it’s really out of greed and unstable mental health, probably.
If i had to guess, I would say it was done to prevent him for getting more victims. A man going around the country manipulating women into unprotected sex is a serious health issue. With this knowledge i am sure many woman are now saved from a horrible fate.
@user-sj5ju4jb7yeah but some of us saw that and won't date the dude if given the chance. Not everyone falls for a rich cheater. This protects alot of us
Coattail riding, big pharma funded gossip column piece. The author also did a peice on why he pays his wife's boyfriends rent.
I still like Huberman. He may not be perfect but neither am I. People who write these kind of articles and obsess over this kind of drama need to get a life.
Seriously
Thank you.
Agree
I don’t agree with how overdramatized this whole thing is with his dating life. But I think there is potentially other factors involved in his “cancellation” where a lot of huberman fans are not liking the direction he is going with his podcast, since much of what he says is redundant and turning into overhyped biohacking bro-science. He also in interviews comes off very pretentious…his last one with Rick Rubin was wild. I love Rick Rubin, but them going on for 5 minutes about how Rubin told a dermatologist not to wear sunglasses? Lol, like…do they hear themselves talk? And David Goggins…”just fucking do it” in 127 different ways . I need a glass of wine and a joint to tolerate it. Don’t come for me Andrew! I’m doing my cold plunge right after with my AG1 to balance it.
I think the point might be, that if he can be so deceitful and manipulative to those closest to him whom he should care and love the most in his personal life, why not to people he hardly knows ie you, in his work life? ie can you really trust anything he says and therefore his "teachings" could be wrong and even harmful. In both circumstances, he's exerting his control and power, which seems to be his objective.
you realised you and Andrew were no friends after he had ghosted you already 2-3 times before and all the experiences with promised trips or activities which never happened 👀 you are a very patient person - my respect for that 🙏
lol. Thanks.
@sgcarney Lol time to grow up Scott. Any almost 50 year old airing dirty laundry on the internet for likes should know bettet
🤣🤣🤣 I'm so ded.
@@jeffambrose7539 I disagree with this. In our culture a person who steps forward with information about an abuser is likely to face extreme blowback. That's why so few women come forward after being assaulted. In this case there were multiple women talking to each other: there are plenty of them to corroborate each other. I wish them all the best for their emotional recovery from the vile acts of Andrew Huberman. And for all the guys out there: I'm a woman and what he did (lying about being exclusive so he didn't have to use a condom) is 100% rape in my mind. Please think about how you behave out there, Huberman's sick mentality is all too common in the US.
Sounds like you are using an article to promote your work. Multiple times throughout this video you highlight things you are selling(books written, etc).
Your waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh is showing.
I had similar experiences with a manipulative person.
I started listening to Scott after he exposed Win Hof's bizarre behaviour. Everything he said was in line with my direct experience of Wim, who purposely exposed people to dangerous dangerous situations and laughed at them if they didn't obey him. For example, while we were on a trip to Poland, one guy had injured his feet really badly jumping off a rock into icy water (Wim told him to do it). Wim then encouraged him to climb the icy mountain in shorts as is customary on these expeditions, even though he couldn't walk properly. No one suggested he get an x-ray even though they all celebrated him for ascending a mountain with apparent "broken heals". To me, Wim was a monster.
He had a lot of power over young men. for some reason.
Our expedition was in 2016. Afterwards, I became profoundly depressed, another person on the expedition got cancer and another developed serious heart trouble. So much for the magic cure.
I like cold water dips, but quietly, as a meditation, and only when I'm completely healthy.
Wim is not for everyone. Especially not the weak.
@KarlMancini there's a difference between weak and injured
@@KarlMancini following crazy people is weak
@@KarlMancini.. u go be strong bud 🤣
Scott’s full of bs. I’d believe him
If he were to criticize big Pharma or establishment media but he all he does is defamation of character on independent voices who actually provide tools to improve their health. But he just wants you to consume your pills, take your booster and believe everything that get published on NY mag. 😄.
He sucks !
Glad to have found you. I was a subscriber to his channel but the actual science didn’t always seem to add up to his conclusions and strong proclamations.And other red flags dropped along the way. While it is wonderful that he has helped some people, each statement needs to be evaluated separately.
I don't know Huberman's work but the gestalt of it all reminds me of Bikram Choudhury. Someone can say, "Hey, I got a lot out of learning Bikram yoga. So he's not perfect and preyed on women! Who cares?" While others are seriously disturbed by it but may still do the yoga. And of course some are turned off by Bikram yoga altogether. But the people here blaming folks for breaking the story -- that seems odd to me.
This messenger blame is the exact reason why so few women ever get heard when they are assaulted.
Comparing Huberman to Bikram is a stretch. Bikram was a rapist and a serial assaulter, especially with women he had direct employment power over. The only allegations against Huberman are that he… hooked up with a lot of women and was unfaithful. These two things are not comparable
Sorry, I just don't get it. When I want information about brain science, I listen to Dr. Huberman. If I want information on how to improve my personal relationships, I will not be seeking information from Dr. Huberman. This seems like common sense. Most people have personal flaws. Why do people fail to have compassion for a person who happens to be a brain scientist who apparently has many personal flaws?
I can see both sides. However, if something is helping an individual take control of their own life(not others through manipulation), does the source ultimately matter?
Huberman may be his own defeatist and suffer in a horror he has created himself.
I know people are focusing on the cheating, but I'm very unsettled that he, being in therapy for a long time, has said to a named scientist that he lies to his therapist all the time. Another thing that bothers me a lot is that people and especially young men, follow him because he's the story of a troubled kid who turned out good, but his parents and school colleagues say he wasn't the bad kid he says he was.
Romantiziing one's origin story is pretty common but lying to your therapist is definitely a red flag.
@@dionysusnow Maybe he's just there for content ideas? I mean, if that's something he brags about why spend the money on therapy? Like why bother?
I don't get this. I'm a man in my thirties, I listened to quite a few of his podcasts and found it useful. And I never heard about this whole spiel of him being a troubled kid etc. And to me, lying is a protective response. We do that sometimes out of pure habit, probably formed because we wanted to avoid facing, or avoid a perceived negative consequence of the other person knowing "the truth". I really don't get why you find this "very unsettling". To me, it feels like a normal, valid human reaction that is resulting from a lack of complete emotional safety with his therapist. And that doesn't mean he or the therapist is bad or disingenuous... emotional safety is built over time and patience and the right approaches to building it.
@asciiguy1 So because you never heard it after listening to a few of his podcasts, it didn't happen?
@asciiguy1 there is never any justification to lying and you would think a scientist of all people would be aware of the detrimental impact that dishonesty has on the the liar's brain. Even white lies are psychologically damaging. I'm so sick of people defending this behaviour. It's disgusting
It seems like some people are focusing on his personal life rather than the content of his podcast. Many listeners are interested in learning from his work. Having over 10,000 citations suggests he's a well-respected researcher. This type of journalism can be seen as intrusive. Do not act like a cry-baby.
His citations often don’t say what he says they do.in fact they often aren’t there or the articles say the opposite.
Half-dozen women is rookie numbers. There are women out here playing a half-dozen guys a week.
Thank you Scott! We need people like you who expose those nowadays charlatans! Great job! Thanks once more! 👍💙🙏
I appreciate that
The fact that you’re reading from a script says a lot. Who wrote it; you, or New York Magazine?
It is crazy that a person doing a video would read from a script. Just crazy.
@@sgcarney It really is. I mean, anyone can write and read from a script, but you couldn't even take your eyes away from it for like 2 seconds. Almost like... you didn't know what you wanted to say. Like you know, someone... wrote it for you. Funny, right?
There are a lot of fan boys and girls who wouldn't believe anything negative if there was a video showing him participating in nefarious acts. If true, he's a classic narcissist.
Yes. If true he is a classic narcissist indeed.
I'm so tired of that damn word being thrown around for every single little thing
"If true, he's a classic narcissist". You sound like someone who spends way too much time on RUclips.
@@firewithfire848 what else would you call lying to 6 people at the same time while being intimately involved with them and even trying to have a baby with one of them? what else would you call having no qualms about setting up a woman to get pregnant with your child while you have 5 other secret women she doesn't know about?
@@こなた-m1o I would call it, who gives a shit, its none of my business. I don't listen to the man's podcast for character building advice.
Plus, since I've gone through life with my fair share of mistakes and situations I could've handled better, I'm not going to judge the guy and pretend I have some moral superiority via the anonymity of the internet. Have you gone through life completely free of faults and mistakes? You know what, don't answer that because I could care less. Your private life is your private life and yours alone.
Finally, I keep in mind the source of this whole mess is a mainstream media magazine I've never subscribed to, written by a person I've never heard of. I'll bet the majority of people who have jumped on the, shit on Huberman bandwagon, have never read word one from New York magazine or ever heard of the writer of the story. And let's be honest, the mainstream media's record on truth and honesty needs a lot of work.
Maybe this wouldn't be an issue if building healthy and meaningful relationships, optimizing health and fertility, healing trauma etc wasn't his entire shtick, his entire academic work. I really thought highly of him, but whenever someone's actions are so drastically different from their preachings, I don't see why should they be trusted about anything...
I think even if he were some private Joe Schmoe his behavior would still be reprehensible and disturbing. It's predatory and deliberately cruel. He has built up a kind of mythology about his background that seems even his parents don't recognize. He is a storyteller. Clearly, the man is lacking something deep inside himself. We only know because he is in the spotlight. If he were my neighbor I would never want to interact with him. Think about how it would be to know him personally -assuming this is all true (high index of probability). I would need to delouse after every interaction with him. If one really imagines the behavior, it's sickening.
@Sam-ci8bp I do agree that even if he wasn't a public figure, his behavior would still be deeply immoral and wrong. It just wouldn't be an article. But people are using that same logic to say that making an article about him isn't that important and that it's just a tacky smear campaign... I think public figures, especially the ones that are using their lifestyle and expertise to sell products, should be held accountable if their actions are so contradictory to everything they're preaching
@@conigliana Agreed! Definitely.
@@Sam-ci8bp Everyone makes mistakes and nobody is perfect. Have you (the people here) not made enough mistakes in your own life, that you're sitting on a moral high horse and judging him?
Maybe his private life isn't the way of gods, but that doesn't discredit everything he says. And he has helped many people, including me. So I shall choose to see him as just another human that has faults
According to Neal Brennan, "Most great things in life are from psychopaths and drug addicts."
Damn bro, the feminine energy is strong here
Correct. It’s called respect for women. You should try it some time.
@@sgcarney Did you take that as an insult?
This is just petty
This feels emotionally driven.
Martin Luther King was a womanizer. Many great scientist and leaders had a less than ideal personal life as well, but it didn't take away from their professional accomplishments and achievements, and how they contributed to the betterment of society. Just saying...
Interesting.
NO WAYYYY! I thought something was wrong with him...but I'm still in disbelief
Same. I've just heard and a bit gutted