Consider your idea as the beginning of a study of what it would take to create a "power supply" that runs on gravity. As Nick clearly shows, this iteration of the concept fails because the pump is doing the work of lifting the water and the generator is producing power by the fall of the same water. Even if every part of the machine operated at 100% efficiency and used friction-less bearings, you would still only break even. So, you have to do "something else" to get the system to work. For instance, if you could harness centrifugal force to help you lift the water, or add velocity to the weight of the water as it turns the generator, you could start to make up for your losses. Its a thought experiment.... see where you can take it.
thanks for the insightful comment! You're absolutely right about the system's limitations. I've created a document that delves deeper into this concept, addressing your points. Please checkout this google document drive.google.com/file/d/1Uh8b606-jDdmO2B4sNQ44T4S816Iyd6p/view?usp=drive_link
Magically can produce 11.2 watts from 5! There are already plenty of gravity turbines being fed from hi reservoirs that get filled by green energy powered pumps. They are barely efficient enough to be worth it and they are way more efficient than buckets
Thank you for your comment. I've created a document that delves deeper into this concept, addressing your points. Please checkout this google document drive.google.com/file/d/1Uh8b606-jDdmO2B4sNQ44T4S816Iyd6p/view?usp=drive_link
Gravity-Powered Energy Generator referred on these case is valid only as concept, but calculations are not correct? Why? This is simple, a) water pump 1 litter per minute and the electric motor consume 5 watt. This is 432000 Joul consume during 24 hour or 120 Watt-hr electricity consume. b) Water pumped on 20 meter high has a volume 1440 litter (pumped during 24 hr). This water has a potential power 282528 Joule which may generate 78.48 Watt-hr energy if all energy is converted on electricity. c) so on this time we can see efficiency 282528/432000 (J/J)= 65.4%. d) Potential energy water has at the highest point when moving the generator will generate less than 78.48 Watt-hr electricity, may be 70% of these, so the electricity output may be estimated to 54.95 Watt-hr. Overall energy out versus energy in of this "gravity-power machine" respectively 54.95 and 120 and total efficiency estimated is around 45.78%. Now this knowledge are known everywhere and applied better on Energy Storage Hydropower or PSH, no need for bucked. The world need energy on demand and there are many undisclosed technologies which can do energy generation on demand using physics law. One is levitation-gravity energy generation using heavy blocks of any material which can be lifted on so called levitation towers (invention not disclosed) and on these tower if we will use 1440 kg weight on 20 meter the "levitator" will use less than 56500 Joule energy (less than 15.7 Watt-hr). on the gravity energy generator parallel with levitator tower the energy generated for this case is estimated 78.48 Watt-hr time efficiency 70% which is 54.95 Watt-hr. So the undisclosed levitation gravity generation machine or engine will have input 15.7 Watt-hr energy and output 54.95 Watt-hr energy with EOEI RATIO 3.5. This new undisclosed "machine" is one of the key technologies the world will solve energy transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies, and this technology can be adopted and used on any place on earth. Partners for collaboration are welcomed on further details.
Thank you for your detailed and insightful comment! I truly appreciate the time and effort you put into explaining these concepts. I will take the time to study your points thoroughly and may even create another video to explore the idea you’ve presented. Stay tuned, and thanks again for contributing to the discussion!
@@ManyHeavens42 you are not explaining and can not explain that I am wrong. I am sure you like many others do not and can not understand "levitation" that I am including even if you have completed university studies. The University give knowledge what is discovered and published but not what is discovered and is not published. Read again my comments, probably you will understand what I write. Anyway I respect your time.
Thank you for your follow-up! I appreciate the effort and valuable insights you've shared. I’m reviewing your points carefully and will respond or create a video update soon. Thanks again for your thoughtful input!
even the water pump used only the gravity from weight of the falling filled of water bucket... this is very true
Thanks for your interest in this video.
Fantastic: I love genius ,Now just hook that pump up to a solar panel, Toyota.why didn't i think of that,you did
Consider your idea as the beginning of a study of what it would take to create a "power supply" that runs on gravity. As Nick clearly shows, this iteration of the concept fails because the pump is doing the work of lifting the water and the generator is producing power by the fall of the same water. Even if every part of the machine operated at 100% efficiency and used friction-less bearings, you would still only break even. So, you have to do "something else" to get the system to work. For instance, if you could harness centrifugal force to help you lift the water, or add velocity to the weight of the water as it turns the generator, you could start to make up for your losses. Its a thought experiment.... see where you can take it.
thanks for the insightful comment! You're absolutely right about the system's limitations. I've created a document that delves deeper into this concept, addressing your points. Please checkout this google document drive.google.com/file/d/1Uh8b606-jDdmO2B4sNQ44T4S816Iyd6p/view?usp=drive_link
Magically can produce 11.2 watts from 5! There are already plenty of gravity turbines being fed from hi reservoirs that get filled by green energy powered pumps. They are barely efficient enough to be worth it and they are way more efficient than buckets
Thank you for your comment. I've created a document that delves deeper into this concept, addressing your points. Please checkout this google document drive.google.com/file/d/1Uh8b606-jDdmO2B4sNQ44T4S816Iyd6p/view?usp=drive_link
Gravity-Powered Energy Generator referred on these case is valid only as concept, but calculations are not correct? Why? This is simple, a) water pump 1 litter per minute and the electric motor consume 5 watt. This is 432000 Joul consume during 24 hour or 120 Watt-hr electricity consume. b) Water pumped on 20 meter high has a volume 1440 litter (pumped during 24 hr). This water has a potential power 282528 Joule which may generate 78.48 Watt-hr energy if all energy is converted on electricity. c) so on this time we can see efficiency 282528/432000 (J/J)= 65.4%. d) Potential energy water has at the highest point when moving the generator will generate less than 78.48 Watt-hr electricity, may be 70% of these, so the electricity output may be estimated to 54.95 Watt-hr.
Overall energy out versus energy in of this "gravity-power machine" respectively 54.95 and 120 and total efficiency estimated is around 45.78%.
Now this knowledge are known everywhere and applied better on Energy Storage Hydropower or PSH, no need for bucked.
The world need energy on demand and there are many undisclosed technologies which can do energy generation on demand using physics law. One is levitation-gravity energy generation using heavy blocks of any material which can be lifted on so called levitation towers (invention not disclosed) and on these tower if we will use 1440 kg weight on 20 meter the "levitator" will use less than 56500 Joule energy (less than 15.7 Watt-hr). on the gravity energy generator parallel with levitator tower the energy generated for this case is estimated 78.48 Watt-hr time efficiency 70% which is 54.95 Watt-hr.
So the undisclosed levitation gravity generation machine or engine will have input 15.7 Watt-hr energy and output 54.95 Watt-hr energy with EOEI RATIO 3.5. This new undisclosed "machine" is one of the key technologies the world will solve energy transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies, and this technology can be adopted and used on any place on earth.
Partners for collaboration are welcomed on further details.
Not if you hooked the pump Up to solar
Your wrong
Thank you for your detailed and insightful comment! I truly appreciate the time and effort you put into explaining these concepts. I will take the time to study your points thoroughly and may even create another video to explore the idea you’ve presented. Stay tuned, and thanks again for contributing to the discussion!
@@ManyHeavens42 you are not explaining and can not explain that I am wrong. I am sure you like many others do not and can not understand "levitation" that I am including even if you have completed university studies. The University give knowledge what is discovered and published but not what is discovered and is not published. Read again my comments, probably you will understand what I write. Anyway I respect your time.
Thank you for your follow-up! I appreciate the effort and valuable insights you've shared. I’m reviewing your points carefully and will respond or create a video update soon. Thanks again for your thoughtful input!