it was massive back then because there was less choice of media. People are way more split now but still as Johnny Depp and Amber Heard showed, the right case can blow up.
This is far more of a fiasco than I realized It was back in 1995 ---whenever this trial happened... This is wild. This documentary sets all of this straight.
It's a really embarrassing commentary on our justice system. When police think it's obvious who the killer is, they get sloppy. Which is great for the defense. Check the Alexander Jackson case. Police almost let that guy walk away from killing his family because they assumed it was obvious he did it. Defense made a joke out of them
If you didn’t live through it, you would be amazed at how all encompassing this murder and trial was. And this was pre internet. I can’t even fathom if it happened today.
There was an identical pair of gloves proven to be purchased by Nicole for OJ a few years prior and the only brand of gloves he owned. His other pairs of gloves at home were also same size same brand.
@@rosejr2614 they did dna testing. The gloves were his. Her blood was in his bronco, his home, and his was at the crime scene. Unfortunately at the time it wasn’t a fully understood science and the defense was able to make the cops look like they planted it. OJ is so guilty it’s ridiculous, and in today’s world he would have never walked.
Lee Bailey talking in circles. Says there was two killers but nobody could leave the scene without leaving footprints. Meanwhile there was only one set of footprints
Yep. That's something most people don't catch in this case (certainly not the jurors). Just like the defense expects anyone to believe that either #1: Vannatter & Fuhrman (after first meeting each other) plotted (on the spot) to frame Simpson or #2: Fuhrman & Vannatter decided on their own to just start planting stuff. Like Fuhrman said to Alan Dershowitz on CNN's Crossfire: "You got two conspiracies going now?"
@@09rja Exactly. The problem with not deliberating, or honestly even understanding how to deliberate, is that you don't catch these contradictions. The jury was simple minded, and came to their verdict in a simple minded fashion. Never bothered to wonder how the blood got in OJs driveway before he ever got back from Chicago. Never bothered to consider the odds that OJ just happened to cut himself the same night his ex wife is murdered and someone dropped a glove of the SAME hand he was cut on. People don't want to consider the facts because that would lead to them having to acknowledge something that's obvious to the rest of us who aren't lying to ourselves.
15:15 (18:30 yet they still did a horrible job?) (20:20 If oj wasn't a suspect, why not just take his kids home?) 21:41 Nobody else saw blood... why would you need to add blood later INSIDE if there was already blood? 22:46 Furhman jumps over the wall....every keeps saying it was a "Decision" ( 27:50 , 29:50 ) ( 32:10 EVEN THEN they knew the press was biased ) ( 36:02 ) 37:38 ( 38:59 but they expect us to believe that about OJ? )
@@tombreckinridge6218 Real Question. Honestly, have you even watched half, of the trial or is your entire belief 🤔 from watching shows like this? And do not say you watched the trial if you didn't, because I'll quickly ask you a question - and you will not answer it. Because you can't.
@@Jeromemayle I watched the entire trial at the time it happened. Evidence and facts mean nothing to people like you. You have a clear bias. Probably some type of racism like the jurors who didn’t care that a black celebrity killed 2 white people. If he killed his first wife. They would have found him guilty. One of the jurors said they all knew he was guilty but wanted to punish the police for the Rodney King incident. Which is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. His own defense team knew he did it too. Shapiro was on tv numerous times before he got hired saying he obviously did it.
One of many reasons.the sloppy ass criminalists and lab contaminated both scenes and corrupted what was collected so badly no good faith juror could vote for conviction
No, he’s not. The REAL reason OJ never spent a minute in prison for murder, was because the jury wanted revenge for the Rodney King beating. Watch OJ: Made In America, one of the jurors admitted that 90% of them wanted revenge. They were never going to give a guilty vote.
He was getting out on parole anyway, but he made a pile of cash of OJ signing merch while OJ was in jail during the trial. I'm sure he's still trying to get as much merch signed as he can before prostate cancer takes OJ out.
I'd say contaminating a crime scene and not following proper protocols is a little more serious than just not crossing a T or dotting an I. That one guys willingness to look beyond critical errors is dumbfounding.
@@MarthaCeballos-c5c very likely...for some unknown reason, the Jury hated Nicole and simply did not want to believe her for " stealing" OJ from his first spouse....so, the case was lost early on! Plus, Mark the racist police using the " N" word many times. It done within the first couple of months...on adding, we all know that OJ was a beloved celebrity with wealth and hired great/ : brilliant attorneys ...plus when they div deep into Nicole's character that found out that contributed to her demise.
Interesting how Tom Lange demands that everything be beyond reproach in determining not to make an arrest. Sure seems like the accused better be perfect and have perfect answers. But when his department and colleagues make clear mistakes he just sort of says its not consequential. He says it's not a big deal. Except it is a big deal. It's a big deal because he holds people to the very highest standards before he will determine if an arrest is made. It is only right that he and his colleagues be equally held to the standards he so happily applies to the accused.
He keeps saying the millions of "mistakes" wouldn't have changed anything. He wants people to trust HIS gut. Not evaluate evidence. It was a horrible crime, but we aren't supposed to render a verdict based on emotion. I believe he was a pompous, abusive ass. But you can't convict him of double murder for that
@@pommiebears SIGH................ YES WE DO know that, Nicole said it herself on tape. The last time HER and OJ got into a physical alteration was in 1989. They played her on tape saying that in the deposition.
When the jury and alternates made the trip to both the Goldman apartment and the Simpson residence, the place where the bodies were found, it should not have been announced by the media. IN that way, there would not have been so many onlookers present. I am really surprised that Judge Ito allowed it to be broadcasted like that. Unless I am wrong, I thought they usually kept a lid on things like that to keep the public away. Just my thoughts on that matter.
F Lee Bailey was coercing this man to tell him what he wanted. I cannot stand rude, condrscending personalities such as F Lee Bailey. Really wished this dream team would have lost. Their egos were over the top as as and is OJ. OJ and all who know what really happened such as Kardashians will pay with Spiritual justice.
To speak truthful, there was rudeness, dishonesty, & corruption displayed on both sides of the aisle. Sorry that you choice the losing side of the team, but we have admit and give credit to the best prepared side.
Please do not be part of the problem by preJudging Simpson ..yes it is true, he may(probably was somehow strongly involved ) however we should all be careful not to be part of the problem with rushing to Judgement.
You are being self righteous! There were no witnesses...yes I'm aware of the tainted blood evidence....Barry scheck was a wonderful lawyer and presented incredible forensic evidence that can not be ignored....much of the evidence was either tainted or possibly planted....No way that Simpson had the time to create all of this mayhem alone....remember, he was close to 50 years old...think on your own...😊
Because they had two children at the cop shop with no mother. And, it was OJ Simpson. Without doubt they wanted to tell him before press saw the crime scene. The blood on the bronco is why they jumped the fence. They didn’t know if someone was injured in the house as no one was answering.
You don't understand what? that they saw blood on his gate and they just saw his ex-wife murdered so now they jump the gate. You must be racist if you think that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
They felt that was an emergency. They also believed that OJ could've been in grave danger & possibly bleeding profusely...OJ was a celebrity and they are VIP.
Well, when O J did not open the door for the driver, he was busy killing; when the freeloader did not open the door, he was not busy killing? Double standard!
OJ could not open the door because he overslept...He soon heard the limo driver after his constant persistence..OJ seemed to groggy at the time, then advised Parks that he would be right out...I think that OJ fell asleep on the couch after chipping golf balls.
So you want every human who doesn't immediately answer a door to be suspected of killing? Kato Kaelin was not a suspect being asked to account for his time. Should we throw every white person on the suspect list so you feel better. POC are treated poorly by police and OJ killed his wife. I know the jury used this trial to try to get some justice for the black community but they freed a killer
⚡️💚✨ Ya know, if the sock’s sopped with blood, taken off, then thrown on the floor, gravity & time are going to displace this saturation. It bleeds through, colors & blood does this. Perhaps someone should’ve called a housemaid or a laundry mat employee as the star witness, cause what you obviously have here are a bunch of suits that don’t wash their own clothes. Whites, colors, hots, colds, soap & bleach, anything wet. What don’t you mix where for why & how is it for what reason to ruin clothes? Maybe a tie die expert could’ve helped? Everybody understands this concept, 🌞🌕🌎🌳😴🍎🥴, correct? 🩸🧦 I don’t understand what a man such as Bailey is so proud of for getting another man off of a murder he knows he committed. Does he feel he aided in out smarting the integrity of the system? Does he take pleasure in the victimization of defenseless women in nightgowns? He’s going to have to answer to God for that, & he will too. The Lord knows what occurred there & it’s down right spooky how The Lord encircles. A wisdom No stranger to any student of the word. Sucks to be them 👎🏻
ive always said the same thing. maybe he took off the socks, put them on the floor, then stepped on them and that easily could transfer it to the other side.
@@markmac2206the blood would be sticky and dried by the time he got home. You can't step on them to make that transfer stain. Why would he leave the socks on a white rug if he got rid of the clothes that had to be blood soaked. How do you get blood on the door and console but not the seats when you're covered in blood with no time to clean the car? Why no cuts on his hands that night? Six people testified they saw or shook his hand after the killings
The socks weren’t sopping though. The blood hadn’t penetrated the woven fabric. It was deemed a transfer stain from a bloody object being wiped across the sock. Why would he get rid of all the bloody clothes, shoes and weapons but leave the socks behind? He apparently had a really good hiding spot he was able to get to and get home in 20 minutes. How did he drive that car without blood getting on the seats? The gloves came off, he got cut and was bleeding. Blood would be on the extra clothes he would’ve had to have. So there’s more clothes to get rid of because they never found any blood on his clothes. He couldn’t have jumped his own gate and thumped the wall completely covered in blood without leaving any on the wall, AC unit or gate. Nicole was wearing a cocktail dress from earlier and had come out to meet someone that wasn’t OJ or Ron. Maybe Bailey believed he was innocent, like tens of millions of other people do. You guys should petition for feds to conduct an investigation since the LAPD and DAs office mucked this one up so badly.
I still don't understand why the jury made a field trip. Has that ever been done before? If it was to see how close the locations were...have they ever heard of a map??
What a disgusting display of lawyer power covering up the facts. Oj did it period. How do you explain the noise behind katos apt and being seen walking in around the time after the murders. His shoe prints were there his blood was everywhere. Its a joke.
Please enlighten me, how does the noise behind Kate’s apartment convict OJ using the timeline established? You’re making some pretty extreme allegations against the lawyers, you must have some piece of evidence nobody else has ever found in the 30 years since the murder to make that statement.
OJ did it everyone knows he did it which is why he never got any more work after that. He was so arrogant to think he could commit homicide and his nice lifestyle would continue on as normal.
There’s also the theory that the weapon along with the clothes were in the brown leather bag that Robert Kardashian removed from OJ’s house in the days after the murders.
The Steps were still blood stained. They would always be. Concrete hold stains like that. Someone bought the place and tore out those walkways and stairs. I would never live where someone was klld. Absolutely Not.🕊️🕊️💐🙏🏼
He plead the 5th to the entire testimony. They asked that specifically bc they knew he could not say anything but that and most common people do not realize that rule. If you are asked 10 questions and plead the 5th you have to answer that way to all 10 questions.
I wonder how proud that lady would be if her daughter was in a DV relationship and then killed would she be proud of the lawyers representing her daughters killer.
You can't assume people are guilty of something because they've been accused. I have two daughters and I would want the truth. Not just having someone to blame. I wish every defendant could have a dream team at their disposal. Don't we want people to have the best representation possible? This case and many before have proven cops lie and plant evidence. We are innocent until PROVEN guilty
Kim Goldman reminds me of Molly Shannon in her face and mannerisms. If there were ever another movie made, I think Molly Shannon could be successfully cast as Kim.
No…not all evidence is on trial. The prosecution didn’t submit the bronco chase, the suicide letter, or the interview with Lang and vannatter. You can only consider the evidence that has been submitted for consideration. Everything else….is off bounds. So….he’s right. Why didn’t the prosecution put it all in? Because OJ had said he didn’t do it in the interview and during the bronco chase, and in the letter. Marcia Clark is an idiot, because he had also entered a plea of not guilty, which everyone knew as there was a trial! Unbelievable!
Because Simpson was walking back there to get to the entrance of his house, and bumped into the air conditioning/heater unit, and dropped one of his gloves back there. That's what Kato heard.
I love how the prosecution and the Goldman family is like so what if they didn't do anything right and the crime scene is contaminated and the cops are lying it doesn't matter lmao theses l People are idiots
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Can you imagine if this was happening now?..with social media?!..it was massive back in the day..it would be crazy now!
I agree
OJ might have gotten spotted on a traffic cam speeding back home.
They had TVs, Einstein
it was massive back then because there was less choice of media. People are way more split now but still as Johnny Depp and Amber Heard showed, the right case can blow up.
@@markmac2206no doubt about that.
This is far more of a fiasco than I realized It was back in 1995 ---whenever this trial happened... This is wild. This documentary sets all of this straight.
It's a really embarrassing commentary on our justice system. When police think it's obvious who the killer is, they get sloppy. Which is great for the defense. Check the Alexander Jackson case. Police almost let that guy walk away from killing his family because they assumed it was obvious he did it. Defense made a joke out of them
If you didn’t live through it, you would be amazed at how all encompassing this murder and trial was. And this was pre internet. I can’t even fathom if it happened today.
F Lee Bailey is hands down a bad ass lawyer. That man controlled every person in that court room.
No…he didn’t lol. Watch his cross examination of the FBI print expert. He tells Bailey that his cross is ridiculous lol.
Cochran controlled everyone, not Bailey.
@@pommiebears no doubt Cochran was a great lawyer as well. These guys were able to put on one hell of a show.
@@jessicaaustin5969 I think this was great lawyering on the defense side. It’s a classic case.
@@mirah6546 completely agreed. They created so many smoke and mirrors the jurors heads spun. OJ may be one lucky man on earth but his time will come.
41:03 damn, OJ had three Robert attorneys on his team lol Robert Kardashian, Robert Shapiro, Robert Blasier. Robert had to be his lucky name. Haha.
The GLOVES did fit. OJ was stretching his hand wide open.
The states case was built on a faulty foundation. I.e. Furman, the glove
There was an identical pair of gloves proven to be purchased by Nicole for OJ a few years prior and the only brand of gloves he owned. His other pairs of gloves at home were also same size same brand.
Why didn’t they do dna testing
@@rosejr2614 they did dna testing. The gloves were his. Her blood was in his bronco, his home, and his was at the crime scene. Unfortunately at the time it wasn’t a fully understood science and the defense was able to make the cops look like they planted it. OJ is so guilty it’s ridiculous, and in today’s world he would have never walked.
how did it never come up that the already tight fitting leather glove might have SHRUNK during drying out after it had been saturated in blood ?!?!?!
Lee Bailey talking in circles. Says there was two killers but nobody could leave the scene without leaving footprints. Meanwhile there was only one set of footprints
Yep. That's something most people don't catch in this case (certainly not the jurors). Just like the defense expects anyone to believe that either #1: Vannatter & Fuhrman (after first meeting each other) plotted (on the spot) to frame Simpson or #2: Fuhrman & Vannatter decided on their own to just start planting stuff. Like Fuhrman said to Alan Dershowitz on CNN's Crossfire: "You got two conspiracies going now?"
@@09rja Exactly. The problem with not deliberating, or honestly even understanding how to deliberate, is that you don't catch these contradictions. The jury was simple minded, and came to their verdict in a simple minded fashion. Never bothered to wonder how the blood got in OJs driveway before he ever got back from Chicago. Never bothered to consider the odds that OJ just happened to cut himself the same night his ex wife is murdered and someone dropped a glove of the SAME hand he was cut on. People don't want to consider the facts because that would lead to them having to acknowledge something that's obvious to the rest of us who aren't lying to ourselves.
He’s been disbarred
@@erbjp Well yeah, and he's dead haha.
He was blowing smoke up everyone's ***
15:15 (18:30 yet they still did a horrible job?) (20:20 If oj wasn't a suspect, why not just take his kids home?) 21:41 Nobody else saw blood... why would you need to add blood later INSIDE if there was already blood? 22:46 Furhman jumps over the wall....every keeps saying it was a "Decision" ( 27:50 , 29:50 ) ( 32:10 EVEN THEN they knew the press was biased ) ( 36:02 ) 37:38 ( 38:59 but they expect us to believe that about OJ? )
There was a mountain of evidence pointing to one person
@@tombreckinridge6218 Real Question. Honestly, have you even watched half, of the trial or is your entire belief 🤔 from watching shows like this? And do not say you watched the trial if you didn't, because I'll quickly ask you a question - and you will not answer it. Because you can't.
@@Jeromemayle I watched the entire trial at the time it happened. Evidence and facts mean nothing to people like you. You have a clear bias. Probably some type of racism like the jurors who didn’t care that a black celebrity killed 2 white people. If he killed his first wife. They would have found him guilty. One of the jurors said they all knew he was guilty but wanted to punish the police for the Rodney King incident. Which is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. His own defense team knew he did it too. Shapiro was on tv numerous times before he got hired saying he obviously did it.
@@Jeromemayle the jurors in this case are just as racist as mark fuhrman
@@tombreckinridge6218 NO there wasn't that's why you have to regurgitate phrases like "Mountain of evidence" there was no mountain of evidence 🙄
The murderer can now rest because the murderer died.
Ridiculous to even have Mark Furman participate in this series. He’s the real reason this case didn’t go in favor of the state.
One of many reasons.the sloppy ass criminalists and lab contaminated both scenes and corrupted what was collected so badly no good faith juror could vote for conviction
Why do they invite furhman onto Fox News to opine like he's rehabilitated? He's scarier than OJ by a long shot
No, he’s not. The REAL reason OJ never spent a minute in prison for murder, was because the jury wanted revenge for the Rodney King beating. Watch OJ: Made In America, one of the jurors admitted that 90% of them wanted revenge. They were never going to give a guilty vote.
@@bford5899 possibly, but we have seen many jurors ignore those issues.
He gave the jury the excuse they wanted. But they were letting him go anyway.
Not sure why Bruce Fromong is so supportive of OJ. He’s the reason OJ was in prison in Vegas lol.
Also the one whose speech got him out of prison on parole.
He was getting out on parole anyway, but he made a pile of cash of OJ signing merch while OJ was in jail during the trial. I'm sure he's still trying to get as much merch signed as he can before prostate cancer takes OJ out.
He also made that documentary about glen rogers and oj
Dude is a fraud and does anything at any time if it means making a buck.
He knows Simpson didn't kill those people
The fact a officer says, we work a bit more harder for wealthy, famous and vip species. Is very wrong. Only for that he should be fired.
Why would he be fired for what the precinct obviously does? It's not like it's his unspoken rule.
@@moderusprime the fact he his placing regular people below so called famous people is very bad.
I'd say contaminating a crime scene and not following proper protocols is a little more serious than just not crossing a T or dotting an I. That one guys willingness to look beyond critical errors is dumbfounding.
Or people looking beyond a mountain of evidence that points to one person.
@@tombreckinridge6218 It's not hard to look beyond questionable evidence, regardless of the amount.
You got it
Jury nullification
@@MarthaCeballos-c5c very likely...for some unknown reason, the Jury hated Nicole and simply did not want to believe her for " stealing" OJ from his first spouse....so, the case was lost early on! Plus, Mark the racist police using the " N" word many times. It done within the first couple of months...on adding, we all know that OJ was a beloved celebrity with wealth and hired great/ : brilliant attorneys ...plus when they div deep into Nicole's character that found out that contributed to her demise.
for sure. They could have had a video of OJ killing them and they still would have acquitted him.
Interesting how Tom Lange demands that everything be beyond reproach in determining not to make an arrest. Sure seems like the accused better be perfect and have perfect answers. But when his department and colleagues make clear mistakes he just sort of says its not consequential. He says it's not a big deal. Except it is a big deal. It's a big deal because he holds people to the very highest standards before he will determine if an arrest is made. It is only right that he and his colleagues be equally held to the standards he so happily applies to the accused.
Lange's a tool.
He keeps saying the millions of "mistakes" wouldn't have changed anything. He wants people to trust HIS gut. Not evaluate evidence. It was a horrible crime, but we aren't supposed to render a verdict based on emotion. I believe he was a pompous, abusive ass. But you can't convict him of double murder for that
RELEASE THE FULL STEVEN AVERY TRIAL FOOTAGE!!!!
RELEASE THE FULL STEVEN AVERY TRIAL FOOTAGE!!!!
RELEASE THE FULL STEVEN AVERY TRIAL FOOTAGE!!!!
Bailey is so disgusting....so proud and eager to discuss the trial in his interview.
Lol, he was one of the best of his generation
He won the trial of the century. The media frenzy was Bailey's fault? He was masterful in the courtroom .
Bailey is impressive and a " pitbull" personality, similar to Juan Martinez.
Nothing was contaminated at all. Ridiculous.
11:52.
F lee dominating in the room
He was too stupid to realize OJ could’ve just taken his shoes off.
Yes…flee bailey…remove shoes and avoid blood. Quite simple! Never thought such a huge name in legal history would be so ignorant
Not to mention prosecution should have objected that it calls for speculation
and who killed jon benet dammit?
OJ
Detective Phillips never gave any comments about this trial afterwards, did he?
this is still on?....how many episodes is it
25 I believe.
31:42 Nicole wasn't abused 8 times....
You don’t know that. No one knows, only OJ. He’s not going to admit it, is he?
@@pommiebears SIGH................ YES WE DO know that, Nicole said it herself on tape. The last time HER and OJ got into a physical alteration was in 1989. They played her on tape saying that in the deposition.
You're right, it was probably dozens or hundreds of times.
lol to be beaten like that, it’s prolly not a one time thing. There’s multiple phone calls
@dracowuhan7536 Multiple calls from years ago, in fights, she started and hit him first.
5:00 yes we were lol
When the jury and alternates made the trip to both the Goldman apartment and the Simpson residence, the place where the bodies were found, it should not have been announced by the media. IN that way, there would not have been so many onlookers present. I am really surprised that Judge Ito allowed it to be broadcasted like that. Unless I am wrong, I thought they usually kept a lid on things like that to keep the public away. Just my thoughts on that matter.
1st amendment. The court proceedings were open to the media
Oj did it! That is for sure!!!!!
Man everything screams guilty.. All his reactions. If my loved one was killed I would have asked everything about it. He didn't cause he knew
F Lee Bailey was coercing this man to tell him what he wanted. I cannot stand rude, condrscending personalities such as F Lee Bailey. Really wished this dream team would have lost. Their egos were over the top as as and is OJ. OJ and all who know what really happened such as Kardashians will pay with Spiritual justice.
He was doing his job to perfection. No need to hate on this man.
@@BushidoVXXexactly lol
To speak truthful, there was rudeness, dishonesty, & corruption displayed on both sides of the aisle. Sorry that you choice the losing side of the team, but we have admit and give credit to the best prepared side.
Which Kardashians do you mean? Chris and Robert were divorced 3 years before the trial. Only Robert is responsible for his actions and he died in 2003
Try the government. They are full of god and arrogance
Rest in peace Ron and Nicole. Your lives were taken away by an evil man. ❤
Please do not be part of the problem by preJudging Simpson ..yes it is true, he may(probably was somehow strongly involved ) however we should all be careful not to be part of the problem with rushing to Judgement.
@@daviddavis3389 no rush to judgement here.
You are being self righteous! There were no witnesses...yes I'm aware of the tainted blood evidence....Barry scheck was a wonderful lawyer and presented incredible forensic evidence that can not be ignored....much of the evidence was either tainted or possibly planted....No way that Simpson had the time to create all of this mayhem alone....remember, he was close to 50 years old...think on your own...😊
Get out of here mark furman, we know what u did.
@@gamesh0w4life69 😂.
Loathe as I am to admit it, Fuhrman is correct about the notification of Simpson. Very very strange and also another example of incompetence.
4:58
Thats the part I never understood... why was they even at his house jumping over gates.. but calling her mother?
Because they had two children at the cop shop with no mother. And, it was OJ Simpson. Without doubt they wanted to tell him before press saw the crime scene. The blood on the bronco is why they jumped the fence. They didn’t know if someone was injured in the house as no one was answering.
You don't understand what? that they saw blood on his gate and they just saw his ex-wife murdered so now they jump the gate. You must be racist if you think that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
They felt that was an emergency. They also believed that OJ could've been in grave danger & possibly bleeding profusely...OJ was a celebrity and they are VIP.
because there was blood on the bronco at his house after they just found his ex wife stabbed to death at her house. Not hard to understand.
Well, when O J did not open the door for the driver, he was busy killing; when the freeloader did not open the door, he was not busy killing? Double standard!
OJ could not open the door because he overslept...He soon heard the limo driver after his constant persistence..OJ seemed to groggy at the time, then advised Parks that he would be right out...I think that OJ fell asleep on the couch after chipping golf balls.
So you want every human who doesn't immediately answer a door to be suspected of killing? Kato Kaelin was not a suspect being asked to account for his time. Should we throw every white person on the suspect list so you feel better. POC are treated poorly by police and OJ killed his wife. I know the jury used this trial to try to get some justice for the black community but they freed a killer
⚡️💚✨
Ya know, if the sock’s sopped with blood, taken off, then thrown on the floor, gravity & time are going to displace this saturation. It bleeds through, colors & blood does this. Perhaps someone should’ve called a housemaid or a laundry mat employee as the star witness, cause what you obviously have here are a bunch of suits that don’t wash their own clothes. Whites, colors, hots, colds, soap & bleach, anything wet. What don’t you mix where for why & how is it for what reason to ruin clothes? Maybe a tie die expert could’ve helped? Everybody understands this concept, 🌞🌕🌎🌳😴🍎🥴, correct?
🩸🧦
I don’t understand what a man such as Bailey is so proud of for getting another man off of a murder he knows he committed. Does he feel he aided in out smarting the integrity of the system? Does he take pleasure in the victimization of defenseless women in nightgowns? He’s going to have to answer to God for that, & he will too. The Lord knows what occurred there & it’s down right spooky how The Lord encircles. A wisdom No stranger to any student of the word. Sucks to be them 👎🏻
ive always said the same thing. maybe he took off the socks, put them on the floor, then stepped on them and that easily could transfer it to the other side.
@@markmac2206the blood would be sticky and dried by the time he got home. You can't step on them to make that transfer stain. Why would he leave the socks on a white rug if he got rid of the clothes that had to be blood soaked. How do you get blood on the door and console but not the seats when you're covered in blood with no time to clean the car? Why no cuts on his hands that night? Six people testified they saw or shook his hand after the killings
@@bford5899and how did the socks magically appear in the room after the police took a video of the room showing no socks on the floor?
@@jessigreer they showed up later with blood from the test tube wiped on them
The socks weren’t sopping though. The blood hadn’t penetrated the woven fabric. It was deemed a transfer stain from a bloody object being wiped across the sock. Why would he get rid of all the bloody clothes, shoes and weapons but leave the socks behind? He apparently had a really good hiding spot he was able to get to and get home in 20 minutes. How did he drive that car without blood getting on the seats? The gloves came off, he got cut and was bleeding. Blood would be on the extra clothes he would’ve had to have. So there’s more clothes to get rid of because they never found any blood on his clothes. He couldn’t have jumped his own gate and thumped the wall completely covered in blood without leaving any on the wall, AC unit or gate. Nicole was wearing a cocktail dress from earlier and had come out to meet someone that wasn’t OJ or Ron. Maybe Bailey believed he was innocent, like tens of millions of other people do. You guys should petition for feds to conduct an investigation since the LAPD and DAs office mucked this one up so badly.
I still don't understand why the jury made a field trip. Has that ever been done before?
If it was to see how close the locations were...have they ever heard of a map??
After "if," you need to use "were."
They went because the judge manderated
@@marvinbrando722 umm...no and what? Did you mean mandated?
How the hell did Pulp Fiction not win best picture? That's injustice!
What a disgusting display of lawyer power covering up the facts. Oj did it period. How do you explain the noise behind katos apt and being seen walking in around the time after the murders. His shoe prints were there his blood was everywhere. Its a joke.
You’re exactly correct 👍
Please enlighten me, how does the noise behind Kate’s apartment convict OJ using the timeline established? You’re making some pretty extreme allegations against the lawyers, you must have some piece of evidence nobody else has ever found in the 30 years since the murder to make that statement.
They were doing their job🤷♂️
You believe anything the government tells you
F Lee Bailey is a true 👍 legend
That detective is being misleading
How oj’s son was never a suspect blow my mind
dope
He was with your mama ? That's why ?
The defense were a bunch of evil crooks. They should be ashamed of themselves.
They were doing their job 🤷♂️
You wish to have that defense
f lee is savage. and likeable. unlike the prosecution
Nicole and Ron 🤲🏿🤲🏿
Furhman really messed things up
OJ did it everyone knows he did it which is why he never got any more work after that. He was so arrogant to think he could commit homicide and his nice lifestyle would continue on as normal.
But Bush and Obama got jobs
was the murder weapon ever found????
No, they believe it was disposed of when he went to the airport, along with the clothes and shoes he wore.
There’s also the theory that the weapon along with the clothes were in the brown leather bag that Robert Kardashian removed from OJ’s house in the days after the murders.
The Steps were still blood stained. They would always be. Concrete hold stains like that. Someone bought the place and tore out those walkways and stairs. I would never live where someone was klld. Absolutely Not.🕊️🕊️💐🙏🏼
Ito should be ashamed of himself. He gave away control of this trial to the defense. He was a weak man.
To address the host's interjection, It unfortunately would and does happen today. Look at Alec Baldwin.
Mark furhman plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence. That's all I need to know
He plead the 5th to the entire testimony. They asked that specifically bc they knew he could not say anything but that and most common people do not realize that rule. If you are asked 10 questions and plead the 5th you have to answer that way to all 10 questions.
When will you guys stop beating this dead horse
Exactly! Don't give him anymore attention!
I agree. I am soo sick of it ugh.
When oj goes to prison
@@bonhamrichweckl but because of double jeporady laws he can't be charged twice since he was acquitted
I suppose when people stop showing interest.
F. Lee Bailey was a legend in his own mind, yet, somehow everybody bought that/his crap.
Crap ? He basically put nervous to that cop with his tempo. Didn't you see?
@@marvinbrando722 Yeah, and it was a cartoonish performance.
In everyone’s mind. Man was legendary in the courtroom.
@@BushidoVXX Not in my mind; therefore, not in "everyone's" mind.
@@riverebec1 Sure, mostly everyone then.
I walked to the south i mean north
Dont like the Dream Team, very arrogant and aggressive.
Kasandra Court
I wonder how proud that lady would be if her daughter was in a DV relationship and then killed would she be proud of the lawyers representing her daughters killer.
You can't assume people are guilty of something because they've been accused. I have two daughters and I would want the truth. Not just having someone to blame. I wish every defendant could have a dream team at their disposal. Don't we want people to have the best representation possible? This case and many before have proven cops lie and plant evidence. We are innocent until PROVEN guilty
THE GLOVES DIDNT FIT SO THEY DID ACQUIT! RIP OJ
Kim Goldman reminds me of Molly Shannon in her face and mannerisms. If there were ever another movie made, I think Molly Shannon could be successfully cast as Kim.
Legend has it Lange is still trying to justify this shitshow done by detectives.
Era pra ser dublado , a gente não entende nada
39 ron wasn't loyal to
juice of loose
lange is funny. "if you have nothing else, put the evidence on trial"
first off, isnt the evidence ALWAYS ON TRIAL?
also, it worked dummy
No…not all evidence is on trial. The prosecution didn’t submit the bronco chase, the suicide letter, or the interview with Lang and vannatter. You can only consider the evidence that has been submitted for consideration. Everything else….is off bounds. So….he’s right. Why didn’t the prosecution put it all in? Because OJ had said he didn’t do it in the interview and during the bronco chase, and in the letter. Marcia Clark is an idiot, because he had also entered a plea of not guilty, which everyone knew as there was a trial! Unbelievable!
That’s not what he said, he said when u have nothing, u put the cops on trial. Which is true.
He is a joke
Lol @ Mark and the other investigators who screwed up.
Yeah celebrities who can get away with anything just bc they are rich and famous is hilarious
Why would a glove be behind Katos guest house ? Has anyone ever thought maybe Kato was involved?
No.
Because Simpson was walking back there to get to the entrance of his house, and bumped into the air conditioning/heater unit, and dropped one of his gloves back there. That's what Kato heard.
Can you explain why no one else's DNA except OJ's, Nicole's and Ron's were found ?
OJ The Great
That Bailey guy looks like a real ghoul
I love how the prosecution and the Goldman family is like so what if they didn't do anything right and the crime scene is contaminated and the cops are lying it doesn't matter lmao theses l
People are idiots
What does the number "25" represent in this OJ 25 title? Anyone?
The year that F Lee graduated From Harvard university!! ( He has been around for awhile)
25 years since the Simpson Trial.
@@JosephASmith-km6yf thanks!