Soundtest - Wharfedale EVO 4.1 vs EVO 4.2 - How big is the difference?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 апр 2023
  • Soundtest - Wharfedale EVO 4.1 vs EVO 4.2 - How big is the difference?
    Equipment:
    BlueSound Node 2i running digital to Audiolab 9000A integrated amplifier. Using Kimber Kable 8TC as speaker cables.
    Wharfedale EVO 4: amzn.to/3QTeyCi
    BlueSound Node 2i: amzn.to/3MWOvrk
    Kimber Kable used as cables: amzn.to/3sy3gdq
    Audiolab: amzn.to/3usrSEU
    Music used in video from Artlist:
    artlist.io/?artlist_aid=Audio...
    Used equipment for recording:
    Microphone - Shure MV88+ : amzn.to/3ucINew
    12 Ring Light: amzn.to/47uONha
    Apple iPhone 15 Pro: amzn.to/3MEBPFs
    HiFi on Amazon: amzn.to/40xnFf7
    Sign up for a free Roon trail:
    www.rofjdjk3ns.com/8K93FS/2CTPL/
    Music used in video from Artlist:
    artlist.io/?artlist_aid=Audio...
    00:00: Intro
    00:14: Out of Flux - Saxbounce (EVO 4.1)
    00:44: Out of Flux - Saxbounce (EVO 4.2)
    01:18: (Cinematic) Ian Post - Clarity (EVO 4.1)
    02:30: (Cinematic) Ian Post - Clarity (EVO 4.2)
    03:41: (Classical Music Playing) Ian Post - Canon in Major D (EVO 4.1)
    06:13: (Classical Music Playing) Ian Post - Canon in Major D (EVO 4.2)
    08:43: (Jazz music playing) The Roar by Southside Aces (EVO 4.1)
    09:41: (Jazz music playing) The Roar by Southside Aces (EVO 4.2)
    10:40: (Acoustic / Indie) Low Light - Never Lost (EVO 4.1)
    11:30: (Acoustic / Indie) Low Light - Never Lost (EVO 4.2)
    12:40: (Electronic) Curtis Cole - Ratata (EVO 4.1)
    13:30: (Electronic) Curtis Cole - Ratata (EVO 4.2)
  • ВидеоклипыВидеоклипы

Комментарии • 26

  • @yewfh-oz7in
    @yewfh-oz7in Год назад +29

    The mid range driver takes the 4.2's to an entirely different level of realism and depth. Stunning speakers.

    • @mjak993
      @mjak993 Год назад +5

      The 4.2 really needs a big room and a big amp to come alive - I think the 4.1 is plenty good for most realistic applications.

    • @dominicgoh3443
      @dominicgoh3443 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@mjak993😂😂😂❤
      🎉❤

  • @HawkFest
    @HawkFest Год назад +1

    On the Jazz sequence, we can hear a "hum" during silent breaks coming from the EVO 4.2. Otherwise, I like the 4.2 better, as it has a more coherent staging in fulfilling the original soundtrack "intentions".

  • @ckons89
    @ckons89 6 месяцев назад

    Do you think that EVO4.2 could be paired with musical fidelity M1 ?

    • @eamonnbrown7877
      @eamonnbrown7877 4 месяца назад

      Mine sound really good partnered with a Marantz PM8006

  • @sotie
    @sotie 11 месяцев назад

    What stands are you using for the 4.1's? It looks very nice with them.

  • @dieterloebel2459
    @dieterloebel2459 Год назад +2

    Die 4.1 ist nicht schlecht.
    Aber die 4.2 ist besser.
    Instrumente werden klarer dargestellt. Der Hochtonbereich ist kontrollierter und passt optimal zum Mittelton. Die 4.1 kann durch den helleren Hochton die Geigen nicht sauber darstellen. Die Seiten der Geigen haben mehr Luft.

  • @user-jd9bi8bs5d
    @user-jd9bi8bs5d Год назад

    4.2 прекрасные колонки. Звучат божественно!

  • @user-hl2kv6tz9v
    @user-hl2kv6tz9v 4 месяца назад

    Please next music test

  • @tpop3723
    @tpop3723 6 месяцев назад +3

    How do they perform at low volume?

    • @caspar_gomez
      @caspar_gomez 6 месяцев назад +2

      we wanna know

    • @Moonloop76
      @Moonloop76 4 месяца назад +1

      Not very well

    • @1010thechamp
      @1010thechamp 4 месяца назад +1

      4.1 not great, 4.2 sensitive to amp, need a £1000+ amp to do it justice.

  • @Beathoven007
    @Beathoven007 4 месяца назад

    The 4.1 is a bit of an odd duckling. The midrange driver is used in the 4.2 and above. I remember hearing the design philosophy being that the midrange driver solved a crossover challenge for the 4.2. The 4.1 does complete the series, but at the same time doesn’t really belong in there.

  • @user-dc5ju5lg4r
    @user-dc5ju5lg4r 7 месяцев назад +2

    4.2👍

  • @alainduquenois3812
    @alainduquenois3812 Год назад

    Je possède les wharfedale Evo 4.2 j'adore leurs sonorités par contre l'amplificateur a du mal a drive correctement les wharfedale Evo 4.2 car c'est enceintes demande énormément de courant

    • @ZeruS117
      @ZeruS117 11 месяцев назад

      Yeah, probably would perform better with something like a Cambridge CXA81.

  • @user-je5kf9pi2u
    @user-je5kf9pi2u 9 месяцев назад +1

    Спасибо, что подписали где какая акустика поет. Очень помогает. Некоторые долбоебы дают возможность угадать...

  • @Ustaleone
    @Ustaleone 9 месяцев назад +1

    I owned both of these, and if you're someone who is on the fence and have a 'small' room. Do not get the 4.2's! They are friggin HUGE! Will get bass boom in a small room.

    • @Lex-hk4fn
      @Lex-hk4fn 9 месяцев назад +1

      Is 4 x 5 meters small room?
      Im really considering these speakers in a 5.(1) system. 4.2 fronts en 4.1 rears.
      Would be nice to use them in a barn as well 5,5 x 9,5 meters.

    • @caspar_gomez
      @caspar_gomez 6 месяцев назад

      damn, you made me doubt

    • @wa2368
      @wa2368 3 месяца назад

      IF you set it in a modal peak location, every speaker will boom. It has nothing to do with the speaker.

  • @jerryjazzbo2845
    @jerryjazzbo2845 2 месяца назад

    It all sounds awful on YT. You need to do a better job with the sound quality of your vids. Too bad, because I was curious.

  • @kadaad
    @kadaad 6 месяцев назад

    Это не тест!