At 16:11 it looks like the mu term disappears from the equation. Is this an error or does something about applying no-slip conditions cause the viscosity to disappear from the overall equation?
professor while writing navier stokes equation full equation should be written then our assumptions and physics of the problem eliminates the remaining terms from navier stokes equation for cylindrical coordinates
At 16:11 it looks like the mu term disappears from the equation. Is this an error or does something about applying no-slip conditions cause the viscosity to disappear from the overall equation?
you are correct, "mu" is missing. u = R^2/(4*mu)*(-dP/dx)*(1-r^2/R^2). Then u_max = R^2/(4*mu)*(-dP/dx). thanks
professor while writing navier stokes equation full equation should be written then our assumptions and physics of the problem eliminates the remaining terms from navier stokes equation for cylindrical coordinates