Matt Borders' History of the Army of the Potomac- 1862

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @adamcecil3630
    @adamcecil3630 Год назад +1

    The Billy Hazzard comment makes me smile for days! That Character got a lot of kids excited about learning the Civil War history! 😊

  • @derekmills3001
    @derekmills3001 Год назад +3

    At 22:17 the guest says "Joe Johnston is the best...". I was sure he was about to say "at retreating"😂

  • @timothysheehy3759
    @timothysheehy3759 Год назад +1

    This presentation was so fantastic and why I keep coming back. To all the talented and creative people at Addressing Gettysburg, I give my sincerest thanks for everything you do.
    - A Mich resident

  • @richsnyder8015
    @richsnyder8015 Год назад +7

    Matt Borders is always an interesting guest. I did like the statement Matt made about Pinkerton and the numbers/intelligence he was giving to McClellan’s HQ. It dovetails nicely with the episode on the BMI with Greg Elder.

  • @bryanfields5563
    @bryanfields5563 Год назад +2

    Great job Matts!

  • @RollTide1987
    @RollTide1987 Год назад +2

    "At least Lee had Jackson and Longstreet..."
    Not yet. When the corps structure was created in the Army of the Potomac in March 1862, the Army of Northern Virginia was still under the command of Joseph E. Johnston and still utilized divisions as the highest organized body of soldiers within an army. It wouldn't be until after the Peninsula campaign concluded in July of that year that Lee would informally adopt the wing structure with Longstreet and Jackson. And I'm fairly certain that the Confederate congress didn't formally approve that arrangement until after the Battle of Antietam.

  • @herodotus7
    @herodotus7 Год назад +2

    Had a nice day touring Antietam with Matt two falls ago. Good guy.

    • @addressinggettysburg
      @addressinggettysburg  Год назад +1

      Yeah I took a tour with him around the same time. I enjoyed it a lot

    • @azt69boyz72
      @azt69boyz72 Год назад +1

      I visited that battlefield 13 years ago. I was astonished at the short distances, especially at Burnside's bridge. It must have been pure slaughter there

  • @csarock1
    @csarock1 11 месяцев назад

    Great presentation!!

  • @meemo32086
    @meemo32086 Год назад

    Really enjoyed that one!! Loved the jokes!!

  • @johnnotrealname8168
    @johnnotrealname8168 Год назад +1

    They named the army on a river? I still cannot fathom that the two capitals were right next to each other. What a horrid year it was.

    • @addressinggettysburg
      @addressinggettysburg  Год назад +1

      Indeed

    • @rationalbasis2172
      @rationalbasis2172 Год назад +1

      Yeah. Later on, the Union would have an entire other Army in Northern Virginia called "The Army of the James." (James is a river).

    • @johnnotrealname8168
      @johnnotrealname8168 Год назад

      @@rationalbasis2172 By any chance is it a tributary of the Potomac?

    • @rationalbasis2172
      @rationalbasis2172 Год назад +1

      @@johnnotrealname8168 It is not. The Union named most (but not all) of their grand tactical armies after major rivers, while the Confederates had names reflecting the region or land area of operation. (Names of battles tended to follow a similar dichotomy -- "antietam" vs. "sharpsburg.")
      Of course, you probably know all this and are just yanking our chains. Aren't you?

    • @johnnotrealname8168
      @johnnotrealname8168 Год назад

      @@rationalbasis2172 No. I am really that ignorant.

  • @zoedaly214
    @zoedaly214 9 месяцев назад

    i would like to learn about the army of potomac

  • @coreystockdale6287
    @coreystockdale6287 Год назад

    Oh let's go

  • @lawrencemyers3623
    @lawrencemyers3623 10 месяцев назад

    Kvetch...😂😂😂

  • @jamesdeen3011
    @jamesdeen3011 Год назад

    Soon to be award winning , if you don't watch you may never know what happened. WTH, 160 years after the event. This seems to me to be click bait and honestly a little bit belittling. I'm sure this is not your intent
    As a lover of history and as you , have read and seen many versions .
    I will endure and give you guys a chance.

    • @addressinggettysburg
      @addressinggettysburg  Год назад +1

      It’s intended for newbies and the studied alike. But to each his own. It’s not for everyone.

    • @jamesdeen3011
      @jamesdeen3011 Год назад +2

      @@addressinggettysburg nothing is for everyone. However you are bringing history in a way that perhaps is appealing to our younger generation, for this I thankful and fully appreciate your hard work. 👍

    • @addressinggettysburg
      @addressinggettysburg  Год назад +1

      @@jamesdeen3011 that’s kind of you to say. And I just reread your original comment and get what you’re saying now. The click baity part is actually sarcasm lol

    • @jamesdeen3011
      @jamesdeen3011 Год назад

      @@addressinggettysburg 👍👍