Panama canal expansion: how it works

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024
  • The expansion of the Panama Canal will not be ready for its 100th anniversary on August 15 as initially hoped by canal authorities.
    Aimed now to be completed by June 2015, the project was proposed in 2006, began in 2007 and has cost so far US$ 6.5 billion, Newsweek reported.
    Connecting the Atlantic Ocean with the Pacific Ocean, the canal currently uses locks in which water flows by gravity and raises ships 26 metres (85 feet) above sea level. Ships can then travel through artificial lakes and channels until they reach another set of locks leading to the sea on the other side.
    The expansion of the canal will feature new sets of locks that will allow the 81-km-long channel to accommodate even bigger vessels.
    The new locks will be larger but use less water than the existing ones. Basins next to them will recycle water from the locks as they are emptied, and use this water to partially refill the locks when another ship passes through. Water from the canal’s lakes will also be used to fill the new locks.
    The new locks will be able to handle ships that are longer, taller and wider. Per-ship cargo capacity will nearly triple, from the current roughly 4,500 standard-container limit to roughly 12,000 standard containers.
    These changes will make the Panama Canal more competitive with the alternative Suez Canal route, which can currently accommodate much larger ships
    The Panama began operating in in 1914. It cost about US$420 million and took 40 years to complete.
    ---------------------------------------­--------------------
    Welcome to TomoNews, where we animate the most entertaining news on the internets. Come here for an animated look at viral headlines, US news, celebrity gossip, salacious scandals, dumb criminals and much more! Subscribe now for daily news animations that will knock your socks off.
    For news that's fun and never boring, visit our channel:
    / tomonewsus
    Subscribe to stay updated on all the top stories:
    / @tomonewsus
    Visit our official website for all the latest, uncensored videos: us.tomonews.net
    Check out our Android app: bit.ly/1rddhCj
    Check out our iOS app: bit.ly/1gO3z1f
    Stay connected with us here:
    Facebook / tomonewsus
    Twitter @tomonewsus / tomonewsus
    Google+ plus.google.com...
    Instagram @tomonewsus / tomonewsus
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    Please watch: "Crying dog breaks the internet’s heart - but this sad dog story has a happy ending"
    • Video
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~

Комментарии • 128

  • @Coffeecup-sb5mw
    @Coffeecup-sb5mw 6 лет назад +22

    this is well demonstrated
    sort of
    100/100

  • @jammorado8129
    @jammorado8129 3 года назад +2

    I'm satisfied with your explain

  • @Visionery1
    @Visionery1 6 лет назад +7

    I seem to be missing something: the lake is 26m higher than the entering/exiting canals, what prevents the lake from running dry if it constantly adds water to the locks? Or is the water pumped back into the lake?

    • @Thesdr666
      @Thesdr666 5 лет назад +7

      That area of the world receives a Lot of rain... so, the water needs to go somewhere- why not out, via the canal?

  • @deklan246
    @deklan246 4 года назад +2

    Viva 🙌🏻 Panamá 🇵🇦 😎

  • @thegreatagitator4675
    @thegreatagitator4675 10 лет назад +65

    Locks, locks, locks, locks, locks, locks, locks and locks. Also locks.

  • @geomodelrailroader
    @geomodelrailroader 9 лет назад +13

    this proves Teddy's Big Ditch is back in the game. it was marvel that it is in 1915 and it is the marvel that it is today without Panama Canal the cargo won't get delivered the world depends on it.

    • @davidkeenan5642
      @davidkeenan5642 7 лет назад +2

      Trade between Europe & Asia doesn't need the Panama Canal. But it is great for trade between the west coast of North/Central America & Europe, & between the east coast & Asia.

    • @geomodelrailroader
      @geomodelrailroader 7 лет назад +1

      David Keenan it is needed because ships have to take the long way after the big giant supermax came out when the Panama Canal was built it can only hold up to the Panamax size Suizmax could get through but barely. With the new Panama Canal every ship can get through Suizmax, Panamax, Supermax, and Alfamax.

    • @davidkeenan5642
      @davidkeenan5642 7 лет назад +1

      "With the new Panama Canal every ship can get through"
      Not quite. The container vessel MV Barzan, the first of six of its class, can't use the new locks. At 400 metres long, it & two tugs can't fit into the new locks. It's 34 metres too long. But this doesn't matter because they are only designed for journeys between Asia & Europe, & they can use the Suez Canal.

    • @geomodelrailroader
      @geomodelrailroader 7 лет назад

      David Keenan yes it can instead of one gate and his wife there are two gates it and a tugboat can fit.

    • @davidkeenan5642
      @davidkeenan5642 7 лет назад +2

      Sorry, I'm sure you are wrong. These massive vessels need at least two tugs, one fore & one aft, to transit the locks. So though the lock basins are 425 metres long, the maximum length of vessels that can use them is 366 metres.
      So the MV Barzan and the Maersk E Series, eight in that class, are just too long.
      My opinion of the canal expansion is that it is a marvelous achievement. Credit goes first and last to the Panamanian people.
      Sure they used foreign contractors, they had no choice, but this most important maritime transit hub will be staffed mainly by Panamanians, and this expansion ensures the security of the nation for generations to come.

  • @saulfernandez8876
    @saulfernandez8876 2 года назад

    Thanks for sharing...great expo

  • @nandhu7339
    @nandhu7339 3 года назад +1

    Happy new year

  • @degreatal
    @degreatal 3 года назад +2

    the question is can it handle ever given?

  • @ghost307
    @ghost307 7 лет назад +8

    Nice ad...but HOW DOES IT WORK?

    • @andmos1001
      @andmos1001 3 года назад +2

      By the use of gravity

  • @adrianfernandez3723
    @adrianfernandez3723 6 лет назад +1

    By the way guys the lake the ships are going into is higher than sea level so if there were no locks the ships would have to go up a gigantic waterfall of nope

  • @Angry.General1461
    @Angry.General1461 3 года назад +2

    I want to see it hold a nimitz-class aircraft carrier!

  • @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496
    @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496 6 лет назад +7

    A HAPPY NEW HUNDRED YEARS .

  • @candeadmanvotetwice4809
    @candeadmanvotetwice4809 6 лет назад +1

    Lucky to pass the canal

  • @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496
    @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496 6 лет назад

    happy 100 years thank

  • @LaurensPP
    @LaurensPP 6 лет назад +1

    Alternative Suez canal-route? That doesn't really make sense. If in shipping from New York to LA I won't take the Suez canal.

  • @dougmc666
    @dougmc666 4 года назад +11

    0:55 "the new locks will be able to handle ships that are longer, taller and wider". Nope not taller, the Bridge of the Americas is still the same height.

    • @schooldb3556
      @schooldb3556 3 года назад +3

      Maybe means a bigger draft, not height above a waterline.

    • @iandavidvillaloboswong5180
      @iandavidvillaloboswong5180 Год назад +2

      Unless youre planning to sail a skyscraper through the Canal none of the bridges should be a problem

  • @Angry.General1461
    @Angry.General1461 7 лет назад +2

    I would like to see a nimitz-class aircraft carrier fit through there.

    • @russg1801
      @russg1801 6 лет назад +2

      It wouldn't be any larger than those mega-freighters; in fact smaller measured by deadweight tonnage. The last US fleet carriers that could transit the old locks were the Essex class, IIRC. Midway class ships retrofitted with angled flight decks were too wide. There was also going to be a BATTLESHIP class called the Montana class that would have too much beam. It would have carried 12 of the Iowa class's 16 in/50 cal [barrels 50 times 16in] guns but with more armor and slower top speed.

  • @regthebackyardjackofalltrades
    @regthebackyardjackofalltrades 2 года назад

    What about the canal that’s supposed be built in Nicaragua?

  • @anthonymina8398
    @anthonymina8398 8 лет назад +5

    so after the expansion, emma maersk can now pass through panama canal?

    • @Lazerdiller
      @Lazerdiller 8 лет назад

      +Anthony Mina Nope, too long

    • @Alvarez272
      @Alvarez272 8 лет назад +3

      basically it fits, since the emma and triple e are 400 meters long and 52 meters wide, and the canal is 425 meters long and 55 meters wide, but for safety reasons they decided not to let in ships longer and wider than 366 meters, 50 meters wide

    • @davidkeenan5642
      @davidkeenan5642 7 лет назад +2

      +Abraham Alvarez
      The safety aspect relates to the need for tugs both fore & aft to steer these neopanamax vessels through the locks. The new locks can't fit two tugs and a vessel longer than 366 metres in the locks.

  • @arkyfer197
    @arkyfer197 4 года назад +1

    👍🏼 🇵🇦 Excellent

  • @carlosdanielscala8605
    @carlosdanielscala8605 3 года назад

    Molto bene grazie Evitaeterna.Ñ.

  • @PimpinArianto
    @PimpinArianto 3 года назад

    Nice👍

  • @fleiva30
    @fleiva30 10 лет назад +12

    The Chinese wants Nicaragua to compete against Panama

    • @WOLFANGHERO
      @WOLFANGHERO 8 лет назад +2

      +Phillip Unrau Because Pacific and Atlantic Oceans do not have the same water level. Thats why The Panama Canal have a lot of Locks.

    • @ewdinbarria3641
      @ewdinbarria3641 4 года назад

      PANAMA CANAL THE BEST

  • @deklan246
    @deklan246 5 лет назад +13

    Algun panameño o latino por aqui?

  • @azkarafiffaww
    @azkarafiffaww 4 года назад

    NICE! (Im from indonesia)

  • @jebise1126
    @jebise1126 6 лет назад +1

    how is suez alternative? its on the other part of the world... you can use both.

    • @matthewhemmings2464
      @matthewhemmings2464 6 лет назад

      Because they both are chock points.

    • @mandalorian_guy
      @mandalorian_guy 6 лет назад +1

      In order to get bigger modern ships from Asia to Europe/North America the Suez is the only practical way. The problem is its longer and less safe than the Panama route.

    • @domynio27
      @domynio27 4 года назад

      The Suez Canal route is dangerous because of pirates groups near of the coast of Somalia, Eritrea and others countries.

  • @CruzH08
    @CruzH08 2 года назад

    La bandera de Panamá de forma vertical está incorrecta...

  • @JaiShivshankar222
    @JaiShivshankar222 7 лет назад +8

    why do we need locks ? just dig a canal and let it be .. wil the water not be there in the canal for the ships to travel on it ?? some 1 plz explain

    • @woldrau777
      @woldrau777 7 лет назад +16

      Not feasible...because of physics and stuff....sorry I was so technical

    • @Rexery66
      @Rexery66 7 лет назад +18

      The locks are needed so that ships can travel upward into the lake. The lake is not made to the same depth as the ocean so the locks are needed.

    • @JaiShivshankar222
      @JaiShivshankar222 7 лет назад +2

      woldrau777 well I wanted to know the reason in depth. thx for trying though

    • @impulse9091
      @impulse9091 7 лет назад +8

      if you dug straight through it would be a giant rapids so the ships could only go through one way and not the other

    • @Derpster2493
      @Derpster2493 7 лет назад +3

      The lake between the locks is 26 meters above sea level. That giant rapid wouldn't last very long.

  • @Blaqjaqshellaq
    @Blaqjaqshellaq 6 лет назад +11

    A palindrome: "A man, a plan, a canal--Panama!"

    • @sawthemin77
      @sawthemin77 3 года назад

      NEVER ODD OR EVEN .....

    • @jahrhome
      @jahrhome 3 года назад

      Top 10 people who already knew about canals before the evergreen incident..

  • @mrdickwhiskey
    @mrdickwhiskey 7 лет назад +18

    Way to go President Carter. "Ships have outgrown the Canal, we are relinquishing control of this vital waterway to Panama." The Panamanians had no idea how to build it or the resources to do it. We should have kept control of it and expanded it. Manuel Noriega sure enjoyed it's revenues.

    • @russg1801
      @russg1801 6 лет назад +3

      Yep, we stole it fair and square! The Isthmus of Panama was part of Nicaragua. They wouldn't give the US a right-of-way to build the canal, so we engineered a little revolution to make Panama an 'independent" country.

    • @santiagopicco1397
      @santiagopicco1397 6 лет назад +7

      Panama was part of Colombia

    • @shashankvishwanath553
      @shashankvishwanath553 6 лет назад +5

      The Revolution was Engineered. Secondly, the US made France and the United Kingdom give up their claims over the Suez Canal in 1956 (during the Suez Crisis) even though they had much more legal weight in their claim (The French made it and the English controlled it till the 1950s). So it was a tad bit hypocritical on the part of the US to want to stay in Panama when they were arguing against the same thing in Egypt.
      For a better understanding, do read:
      1. Convention of Constantinople, 1888
      2. Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty
      3. Suez Cana Crisis
      4. American Invasion of Panama
      Such crisis were the very reason we finally adopted the UNCLOS (Convention of the Laws of the Seas).
      Lastly, the President of Panama being a "bad man" was no reason to not give back what was theirs in the first place. Very silly aregument and dripping with Hypocrisy. There are many a dictoators in the world who were and even are supported by the US. Libya (until they decided to stab him), the Saudi Royal family, the South Korean Dictators and many others. So Heh.
      Peace!

    • @Zoldergamer
      @Zoldergamer 6 лет назад +2

      nice job idiot, i know the history of the canal but it is still the land of panama and not the us

    • @PinedaJoseJ
      @PinedaJoseJ 6 лет назад +1

      mrdickwhiskey silent!

  • @donalddark7962
    @donalddark7962 10 лет назад +1

    Can someone explain something to me...like I don't know how the panel works...I mean does panama owns the panel or it's free? Por like you have to be friends with panama to pass? :(

    • @irvingbarria
      @irvingbarria 10 лет назад

      Yes, it's free, but you have to be friends with them to pass through. Pretty much like your girlfriend.

    • @donalddark7962
      @donalddark7962 10 лет назад

      irving_wp cool

    • @angelamorales410
      @angelamorales410 9 лет назад +5

      Yes,Panamá do owns the Canal, it isn't free though the price depends according to the containers and..all that stuff.
      Im from Panamá btw.

    • @DanielRichards644
      @DanielRichards644 9 лет назад +4

      Purple Fairy Some ships can pay upwards of 200k dollars US for a one way trip threw the canal, probably even more for the new larger ships on the new locks, definitely not free, but better then spending 4 weeks traveling around South America.

    • @donalddark7962
      @donalddark7962 9 лет назад

      So it's a good business nice

  • @beanboozler6438
    @beanboozler6438 2 года назад

    What about the droid attack on the wookies?

  • @prrmpillai
    @prrmpillai 7 лет назад +2

    wow voice!

  • @ranggafahmi8479
    @ranggafahmi8479 6 лет назад +6

    I don't know why they said panama and suez are compete against each other. They're in a different side of the world

    • @Zuaquim1
      @Zuaquim1 5 лет назад +8

      I think they are talking about the route between Asia and Europe, where both canals could be used.

  • @ngocmaymanvlogger7473
    @ngocmaymanvlogger7473 2 года назад

    Tuyệt vời

  • @Pedo_phile_Muhammad
    @Pedo_phile_Muhammad 6 лет назад +1

    Why don't they dug up the Panama canal deeper and get rid of the locks?

    • @enriquelinares9218
      @enriquelinares9218 6 лет назад +7

      they actually try to do this, but it was imposible because of the terrain. there where to many mountains and big rocks etc. so the cheapest way and most efficient way to do it was by making an artificial lake witch they had to make a smaller hall then going all the way down to sea leve. then building the system explane in the video. the first company that try to make the panama canal was from France and they ran out of money after only completing 10% of the canal. when the Americans took over the project they had to change the way it was going to be build if not they would have fell as well. any other question just ask :) just a good Panamanian loving his country!

  • @dannydo2703
    @dannydo2703 7 лет назад +4

    Hi

  • @lieandreality8238
    @lieandreality8238 10 лет назад +3

    Ok

  • @arunaabi2205
    @arunaabi2205 7 лет назад

    Wow

  • @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496
    @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496 6 лет назад

    HAW WE FIX LIHGTS AT SEACITY ALKUWAIT

  • @teru_ftf1429
    @teru_ftf1429 4 года назад

    ok estoy aquí por una pinche tarea

  • @666-o1l
    @666-o1l 6 лет назад +3

    What a mess. Just get rid of the chambers and locks, make it much much wider and greater. I’m Chinese and I can’t stand this type of narrow minded engineering.

  • @habanacerroarti
    @habanacerroarti Год назад

    Animals cant cross now like they did for mileniA

  • @couldbeanybody2508
    @couldbeanybody2508 6 лет назад

    You couldve owned this and britain could have owned the suez. (Which would benefit both our countries) Good move america.

  • @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496
    @mohamedalishafiqueahmed9496 6 лет назад

    LIHGT IS GOOD EVANT

  • @andrewcoit1454
    @andrewcoit1454 6 лет назад +1

    Longer; taller; faster; fatter

  • @trivierinaresh
    @trivierinaresh 7 лет назад +2

    puedes hablar jamaican? pereza!

  • @cesarmaluco769
    @cesarmaluco769 8 лет назад +1

    blaze meth m9 hisssss

  • @hyouzanren1846
    @hyouzanren1846 6 лет назад

    Just nukes the entire length of canal! And create 10km wide free to use passages!

    • @LucaPed94
      @LucaPed94 6 лет назад +4

      spoken like a true American

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 6 лет назад

      hyou zan ren Excuse me? My school is 1 klm away from the canal.

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 6 лет назад +2

      Luca94 *idiot

  • @chronicfever6250
    @chronicfever6250 10 лет назад

    Hi

  • @lieandreality8238
    @lieandreality8238 10 лет назад

    Ok