To be honest, I've never heard Khrennikov had anything to do with Lina's case. Anyway, I don't think such things should be "issues" when we refer to works of art. Once created, they exist on their own (the so-called "3rd world", according to K. Popper) and, in my opinion, mentioning the author's name is only a fair act of recognizing his merit in this particular work without any further reasoning about historical/biographical events. All this relates to the eternal dispute about whether a work of art has an independent value or whether it is always associated in some sense with its author. We can find unpleasant moments in the life of almost every person. However, instead of exalting them over his/her creations, I would rather do the opposite.
@@shpentendelmauzer One can argue exactly the contrary of what you wrote ; Khrennikov is certainly not a bad composer, but this is NOT the right argument here. Please note that in general, states / human communities do not recognize artists who have engaged in politically reprehensible behavior - by not giving them a street name for example. Would you have had the same reaction if you had been the victim of this individual?
My sources 1/ "le destin russe et la musique" Frans C. Lemaire a remarkable study on the overlap between politics and music under the Soviet regime 2/ direct testimony of composer Karetnikov in his memoirs Tема и вариации
@@deodatdechampignac Well, I don't quite understand why my argument is NOT the right one. I don’t argue that the opposite can be objected to me, but I've already given both polar points of view ("the eternal dispute") and I don’t see what exactly could be objected to me, except for what I've already mentioned. The point of view shared by a community as a whole is not always correct (and not always wrong though). Human societies are changeable and their attitude in a specific period of time to anything changes with them, therefore, for example, whether a street is named after someone, whether a monument is erected to him/her or not - this is just a temporary phenomenon. I can’t judge people who are biased towards something because of personal offense or, conversely, blind adoration, but if we talk about the fair recognition of the value of a particular work, this cannot be guided by similar motives, in my opinion. In any case, we are not talking about naming a planet after Khrennikov, but whether it's an issue for me to play his pieces since he was a man with a shady past (this is how I understood your question). I have my own motives for which to respect or despise anyone and I try not to confuse this with the contribution that the person has made to science/art, etc. Therefore, if you are wondering how I feel about repressions or camps as such, then I can assure you that I, as an opponent of any kind of violence, categorically don't like these things. But if you ask me if I like some musical works by Khrennikov or other artists with controversial biographies - let all the sins of mankind lie on them, - I will answer: I like them.
Сошальский был Московский плейбой, ходок. Эта песня про него. Умер от рака простаты. Очень жаль, хороший был челокек.
Трам парапам😅
Мотор взревел, мотор работает исправно без ошибок, а хочется вздохнуть!
Класс! С нотами поможете?
Я?🥱
Да, блин😂
Тогда прослушайте "Капрызы" Мыколы Паганыны! 😆
Isn 't an issue for you that Khrennikov put many composers in the camps, including the widow of Prokofiev ?
To be honest, I've never heard Khrennikov had anything to do with Lina's case. Anyway, I don't think such things should be "issues" when we refer to works of art. Once created, they exist on their own (the so-called "3rd world", according to K. Popper) and, in my opinion, mentioning the author's name is only a fair act of recognizing his merit in this particular work without any further reasoning about historical/biographical events. All this relates to the eternal dispute about whether a work of art has an independent value or whether it is always associated in some sense with its author. We can find unpleasant moments in the life of almost every person. However, instead of exalting them over his/her creations, I would rather do the opposite.
@@shpentendelmauzer One can argue exactly the contrary of what you wrote ; Khrennikov is certainly not a bad composer, but this is NOT the right argument here. Please note that in general, states / human communities do not recognize artists who have engaged in politically reprehensible behavior - by not giving them a street name for example. Would you have had the same reaction if you had been the victim of this individual?
My sources 1/ "le destin russe et la musique" Frans C. Lemaire a remarkable study on the overlap between politics and music under the Soviet regime 2/ direct testimony of composer Karetnikov in his memoirs Tема и вариации
@@deodatdechampignac Well, I don't quite understand why my argument is NOT the right one. I don’t argue that the opposite can be objected to me, but I've already given both polar points of view ("the eternal dispute") and I don’t see what exactly could be objected to me, except for what I've already mentioned.
The point of view shared by a community as a whole is not always correct (and not always wrong though). Human societies are changeable and their attitude in a specific period of time to anything changes with them, therefore, for example, whether a street is named after someone, whether a monument is erected to him/her or not - this is just a temporary phenomenon.
I can’t judge people who are biased towards something because of personal offense or, conversely, blind adoration, but if we talk about the fair recognition of the value of a particular work, this cannot be guided by similar motives, in my opinion.
In any case, we are not talking about naming a planet after Khrennikov, but whether it's an issue for me to play his pieces since he was a man with a shady past (this is how I understood your question). I have my own motives for which to respect or despise anyone and I try not to confuse this with the contribution that the person has made to science/art, etc. Therefore, if you are wondering how I feel about repressions or camps as such, then I can assure you that I, as an opponent of any kind of violence, categorically don't like these things. But if you ask me if I like some musical works by Khrennikov or other artists with controversial biographies - let all the sins of mankind lie on them, - I will answer: I like them.
@@shpentendelmauzer for my sake I do not play or promote artists who have blood on their hands