Glitter-bombed Starmer promises a ‘decade of national renewal’
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 окт 2023
- In Liverpool Sir Keir Starmer told the Labour Conference that he was shocked and appalled by 'the cold blooded murder of men, women and children, including British citizens by the terrorists of Hamas.'
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
On domestic policy Sir Keir Starmer pledged a 'decade of national renewal', and an end to what he called the 'stranglehold of Tory decline'.
He said a Labour government would 'bulldoze' planning rules to build 1.5 million new homes.
And he dismissed a protestor throwing glitter at the start by saying Labour was now a 'party of power not protest'.
-----------------------
Follow us:
Facebook - / channel4news
Twitter - / channel4news
TikTok - / c4news
Instagram - / channel4news
Good to see his security detail is doing their job.. I'd be surprised if their still on him tomorrow!!.❤️🇬🇧🇺🇦
Kier's speech would have gone unnoticed without this protester. Security should be sacked. Next time might be a more toxic substance than glitter.
That can only happen if the nation removes the Tories AND Labour. Failing to do so will be business as usual.
What other option do we have? The spineless Lib Dems? The anti nuclear, stuck in the 1980s greens?
@@seang2700 but we can keep them out of power.
No speech of Keir Starmers sparkles.
The political class all over world have failed the people in the streets.
Undoubtedly.
Mosley was right. Hilter was right. Muss0lini was right.
All they have predicted has come to pass 🏴☀️
Jeremy was a much better man
Kier's just not the one....
People vote for Tories,Then send out horrible comments over the Tories as well,Half the nation just not sure what to vote for and who to vote for,Have to put up with Rishi,He gets voted out who is people going to vote for next,Some other clown,Then people be sending out horrible comments over the next PM who take over and so on,People keep on voting for more clowns,Never ends
As an American can someone from the UK explain what's happening here? Is this guy the equivalent of a US "third party" candidate? Thank you
He's currently the minority leader (Labor Party), and would be the British equivalent of Hakeem Jeffries. If the Labor Party wins a majority of the elected seats, then he will become Prime Minister.
There are two main political parties that vie to form a government. Currently, the Conservative party is in government and it's leader is the PM. Sir Keir is the leader of the Labour party, currently the opposition but hopefully in government after the next elections. 🤞
I'd just like a political party that actually sorts out the problems that we have - immigration, Gov waste, highest taxes of all time, crime, public disorder, education, NHS the list is endless. I just don't see anyone good enough to take the difficult decisions.
Ain't that the truth of it. None of the parties have the ambition. My vote will go to whoever promises significant electoral reform, 'cos the big parties are both pointless and useless.
Neither do I ! But with FPTP there are only two options. Compare the positive rhetoric this week to the dingyness and dispare of the other conference a few weeks ago, I know which of the two I'd far rather have, and which has a greater chance of making some sort of improvement, and who won't just add more fuel to the fire.
Protester drops glitter on him, not to disturb him but to make him shimmer. Then says democracy is citizen led, completely true statement.
What's starmers reaction? Bro gets literally dragged of stage (which has to be assault) and starmer puts on some weird hard man act and completely discounts everything that was said. 😂 What a joke Starmer is.
Then he goes on to say he'd slash the NHS, spend a bunch of money to make the deficit bigger, and build out not up destroying all that wilderness and habitat people want to preserve. 😂 And with each thing he says, fewer and fewer of the people in his own party clap, because they can see what a train wreck his platform is.
Labour need a new leader if they want any chance of winning the next election. And not Angela Rayner either. Someone with actual ideas, someone who genuinely understands the mood on the street and what the protester was talking about. Unfortunately for Labour they don't have any of those visionaries left.
You've been glittered, son!
That showed him!
Anyway..
Surely there should have been half a dozen people up on stage with him throwing out fish.
I thought it was Stop Oil protester but didn't see any orange colour .
Security was 😴 💤
I think it quite unlikely labour would get 2 terms when the offer is tory lite, competence and moving very slowly, claiming tories can’t tax more or raise money in any way for public services. People want substantial investment. My own mother who is far less radical than me, wants fairer taxes.
If you Don’t offer much different, the tories could just produce their own centrist candidate and snatch it back. Keir Starmer doesn’t have likeability or charisma and is thought of as shifty, duplicitous and insincere which is a downer. However if the tories go hard right with suella B, they could continue to gift it to labour.
His retail offer is to the Centre left and centre for the centre right his pitch is stable leadership
Reeve is following the Democrats playbook trying to copy Bidenomics just on a more limited budget which is the abandonment of Austerity and trickle down
When the Tories try to out UKIP the Reform party your analogy looks more like your comparing syphilis to a common cold both are diseases......
The last time the Cons had a centre right candidate was John Major, Cameron ws socially Liberal but a hard right Thatcherite with added Austerity
I would have kept the jacket on.
I just wish there was an actual CONSERVATIVE Party and a LABOUR Party.
I can't tell them apart these days.
Welcome to Brexit Little Britain
@@jjnnhl1032
You are welcome to leave if you hate Britain so much.
@@lennydale92 flattery
It was a much lighter, more pleasant, more inspiring conference than the dark chaos of the tories.
I know which tone I prefer for my countrymen.
you me and my 400 Staff well said
@@caroltodd6691 I hope you and your staff get the relief. 🙌
thank you but we can not take this Tory government any more all for the Rich@@ascgazz7347
That's not true at all
@@ruebencover5795 we see you thumbed your own comment tory shill.
For the few, not the many
One thing this event showed is that even if you cannot polish a turd, you can disguise it with glitter.
Starmer was DPP when Saville was in his heyday. Tells you quite a lot really.@@user-lh8jd2ix2q
@@user-lh8jd2ix2q this is humour to you?
Maybe the police need to look at your web browser.
Great, important, due fucking news as always 😐
Do you need any new journalists mate? I’d be happy to write you up some important reports
Morecambe and Wise security.
This would have not happened to a leader of an party in the US.
Starmer and the Glitter Band….
He probably likes it up the Gary Glitter.
same as what other what people told me,If Leader of the Labour party get Glitter chucked on him,Why Vote for Labour party for ????,I really thought Labour where done and finshed with,People want to vote for change,Vote for U kip if people want Brexit finished with
He should have kept his jacket on!
I would have left the jacket on - looked good!
Conjures up that old saying, 'you can't polish a t urd but you can sprinkle it with glitter!'
You beat me to it...😂
Better than Tory turds that are in our rivers and children's feet and mouths at the beach.
Big talk when you’re speaking the home fans.
No no no no more houses definitely no more houses!!!!! No no more no no no.
Of all the things to have thrown on you Glitter is probably one of the most preferable
In an alternative universe the snooker table got the glitter and Starmer got the orange powder.
The UK is 2.9 TRILLION in debt
TALK
Is CHEAP, if he gets to Open the Batting at the Crease then we"ll see how His swing is.
Still if he's Out early, theirs always Angela S Rayner.
God Protect the United Kingdom
My question still remains. How are you going to pay for all these? Taxing is not the way to go.
Labours plans for economic growth are wishful thinking
we've had this discussion on another thread my view is we cut the Trickle down Cr*p
to be honest I had quite a bit of cynicism a few months back this conference I feel a bit more hopeful, not touching CGT is I think a mistake.
The tax base overall will rise because of Sunak's changes from 32% to 36% the effects of frozen thresholds will add 150 billion to the treasury over 5 years and an effective energy windfall tax could really help consumers bringing down energy prices @@keithparker1346
Said today man was a idiot, but said nothing to his face at the time
Bring back Prescott 😂
He would have sorted him out. Queensbury rules. I think an angry,muscular local farmer was a faired match for him than that metrosexual soy boy,though.
More than half of the country is waiting for a party brave enough to reconsider Brexit. Nothing new can come from a mild version of the Conservative Party
How can Brexit be fix?
@run2cat4run by rejoining the EU and holding politicians responsible for the promises made during the Brexit campaign. With all the lies, scandals and money lost (see what's being reported on covid contracts now), the public is always suffering the consequences and no one is apparently responsible.
It'll happen eventually, we can't rejoin immediately as much as we want to, several EU members have made it clear they will not let us rejoin unless there's a clear overwhelming shift in support *and* clear democratic reforms
God let it go. There is absolutely zero chance of Brexit getting reversed in the next 30 years.
@@massivehero4871 Tories should have stopped it if they didn't want it!
I want him to become PM because I think under him politics will become a lot more boring... and that's precisely why I want him! PMs should be capable first and foremost. Charisma is not important.
maybe, but starmer is spineless and is dangerous in foreign policy. Unfortunately both him and sunak cannot be trusted.
His response was "am I bovered?"
He's lucky it was only glitter and not 💩
Top notch lightening fast security
Security Contactors paid themselves fat performance bonuses for just showing up.
Some comments here essentially call Labour "too leftist" or "too conservative"... means they're probably finding a good balance.
I haven't seen a single comment saying "too leftist"
You just made that up
@@comanchio1976, re-read carefully: "essentially call" not "call". Things like "communist" and "ultra left wing politician in the champagne socialist style" are essentially calling Labour "too leftist".
@@phunanon I haven't seen a single comment even suggesting this. I wasn't being pedantic. I was rejecting the premise on your own terms.
@@comanchio1976, I'll have to ping you on both of those comments then.
Never mind, turns out you can't do that. So I'll just quote them.
@easynow6821 6 hours ago
Please God No! funkin communists
@UKsoldier45 6 hours ago
In short No! Same old stuff. Starmer needs to really distance himself from Corbyn. He is not a Tony Blair. He is a ‘titled’ ultra left wing politician in the champagne socialist style.
Bonus one I didn't spot!
@applepie8772 7 hours ago
The trouble is all these people do is heckle and shout over the top of people trying to shut down debate and discussion. Anti-democratic. Trotskyist I suspect
In short No! Same old stuff. Starmer needs to really distance himself from Corbyn. He is not a Tony Blair. He is a ‘titled’ ultra left wing politician in the champagne socialist style.
Starmer is not left wing
this d right candidate for British ...
Red Tory winker
Great pantomime. Continuity conservatives have their candidate in place and it's Starmer. The donors have opened their cheque books, the media is compliant. Everything is in place.
And the working people of the UK benefit from the focus of Labour, not those Tory parasites.
He will do better against the Conservatives than the old Marxist dog Corbyn did.
Sadly - the sheep will just keep on voting these people into power.
@@alphabetaxenonzzzcatthe weird thing is that there are other parties that could be voted for but people are locked into a 2 party mindset
What alternative parties are credible enough to be worth voting into government?
How did he get on stage to begin with?
By the cunning use of his legs and feet
Stealth and cunning.
He just sounds like all talk
He is. The red party voters will vote him in like their fathers & grand fathers did & he'll finish off destroying the UK, overwhelmed by incompatible, unskilled migrants.
protester dragged off right on. this is so wrong, if you want views do it the normal way. start a party and enter your local elections. not boycotting other parties
He is definitely a lower middle class person and not the working class man he aspires too, most working class men would have been far more aggressive with the loon with the glitter.
You never even saw him before that short clip, why do you assume you know everything about him from it?
How many working class men do you actually know too?
..And why are you assuming every one of them is violent in YOUR cause?
Why is class so important to you?
He had a scholarship to a posh school he will have had it drilled into him daily by the posh bullies what class he was I know I've been there
@@SlowhandGreg So you’re saying that just because you had an experience that he will have the same and react to it the same way?
Do you not want people with a clearly better education in positions of responsibility?
Maybe you’d have put Jimmy Saville in charge of the BBC, or Jeremy KHunt as Chancellor when he’s never had a job about numbers in his life? Oh wait.. 🤣
What exactly do you think you’re saying here?
@@SlowhandGreg if you went to a posh school it should be closed.
Look at your grammar.
Look how you present an argument.
If YOU were eyeing up the job as PM I’d be concerned, but Starmer at least seems to be able to assemble a sentence around a provable point, so between you and he, he gets my vote.
..yours, a state-funded school kid.
@@SlowhandGreg “Slowhand” or Eric Clapton once raged so vehemently on a public stage about black hate, that he inspired a whole social movement against it.
You realise Clapton is about as far right as they come, but you’re here commenting about the left?
Why?
#حقيقة_احتلال_فلسطين قلما وقع عبر التاريخ أن تمت سرقة وطن بكامله، وتفكيك وتشريد شعب بأكمله، واقتلاع وتهجير نصف سكانه وتحويلهم إلى لاجئين ونازحين في العديد من دور الجوار والعديد من دول المنافي والشتات، وحتى في أرض وطنه باعتباره غائباً حاضراً ومقيماً مؤقتاً، كما حصل مع الشعب العربي الفلسطيني. فمنذ ما يزيد على مائة عام ونكبة هذا الشعب مستمرة بمراحل متعددة، بفعل مؤامرة ابتدعتها بريطانيا عبر تنفيذ استعمار استيطاني إجلائي إحلالي صهيوني في فلسطين. وقد اعتقدت بريطانيا والدول المتآمرة الأخرى أنها فعلت ذلك، دون أي مساءلة من أحد، واعتقدت مخطئة أن السنين قد تمحو ذاكرة الضحايا والشعب الفلسطيني.
تتناول هذه الدراسة، أبعاد وجوانب وأسانيد طلب الرئيس الفلسطيني محمود عباس، “فتح ملف الجرائم الدولية التي ارتكبت بحق شعبنا من الانتداب مرورا بالمجازر عام 1948 وما بعدها. ومع حلول 100 عام على هذه المجزرة التاريخية، ومع استمرار هذه الكارثة”. وتستهدف الدراسة المساهمة في تبيان المواضيع الرئيسة في ملف الجرائم التي ارتكبتها بريطانيا المنتدبة آنذاك على فلسطين، والمرور سريعاً على السوابق الدولية بهذا الشأن، وتناول الجوانب والمبادئ والقواعد والأحكام القانونية، لمساءلة الدول عن الجرائم والانتهاكات التي تقترفها تجاه الدول والشعوب الأخرى، وتقديم بعض التوصيات بها الخصوص.
خطوة شجاعة وتاريخية
طالب الرئيس محمود عباس في كلمته بالقمة العربية التي انعقدت في نواكشوط، بتاريخ 25 تموز 2016، الأمانة العامة لجامعة الدول العربية، بمساعدتنا لرفع قضية ضد الحكومة البريطانية لإصدارها وعد بلفور المشؤوم ما تسبب في نكبة الشعب الفلسطيني. وأردف يقول: “لقد انقضى قرابة قرن من الزمان على صدور الوعد المشؤوم بلفور، وتم نقل مئات الآلاف من يهود أوروبا إلى فلسطين على حساب ملايين الفلسطينيين، ولاحقاً لذلك فقد سمحت سلطة الانتداب البريطاني والقوى العظمى باقتلاع وتهجير نصف سكان فلسطين إلى دول الجوار، وفي أعقاب النكبة قامت القوات الإسرائيلية بتمدير أكثر من 531 قرية وبلدة عربية فلسطينية. وأضاف “هذا ونعمل من أجل فتح ملف الجرائم الدولية التي ارتكبت بحق شعبنا من الانتداب مرورا بالمجازر عام 1948 وما بعدها. ومع حلول 100 عام على هذه المجزرة التاريخية، ومع استمرار هذه الكارثة، فإننا نطلب من الأمانة العامة لجامعة الدول العربية مساعدتنا لرفع قضية ضد الحكومة البريطانية لإصدارها وعد بلفور ما تسبب في نكبة الشعب الفلسطيني”[1].
وأعلنت جامعة الدول العربية، دعمها للقيادة الفلسطينية، إزاء عزمها مقاضاة بريطانيا على إصدارها وعد بلفور عام 1917. وقال سعيد أبو علي، الأمين العام المساعد لشؤون فلسطين والأراضي العربية المحتلة بالجامعة، “إن مسؤولية الحكومة البريطانية قائمة ومؤكدة ومستمرة وهي مسؤولية مضاعفة؛ كونها أولاً لا تملك مثل هذا الحق، فكيف تطلق بريطانيا هذا الوعد وتعمل على تحقيقه بنفس الوقت على أرض لا تملكها بل هي ملك شعبها الأصلي وهو الشعب الفلسطيني؟ وكونها ثانياً تتحمل المسؤولية؛ بحكم التفويض الممنوح لها من عصبة الأمم بوصفها الدولة المنتدبة على فلسطين، وهي الإقليم المصنف وفق معايير عصبة الأمم ونظام الانتداب، في ذلك الوقت، ضمن الفئة القابلة للاستقلال كدولة. ودور الحكومة الانتدابية هو مساعدة هذا الإقليم على بناء مؤسسات دولته وتحقيق استقلاله وممارسته سيادته”[2]. وأضاف أن “جريمة وعد بلفور لا تسقط بالتقادم، ولن تسقط من ذاكرة وتاريخ الشعب والمنطقة، أو من وعيه ووجدانه”. الأمر الذي يتطلب في الذكرى المئوية الأولى لهذا الوعد “وقفة للمراجعة على طريق المساءلة والملاحقة الأخلاقية والقانونية”، وقال “إن إعلان بريطانيا عن الاحتفال بالذكرى المئوية لـ وعد بلفور يشكل تحدياً سافراً لأبسط حقوق ومشاعر الشعب الفلسطيني، وللقيم والمبادئ والمواثيق الدولية التي تتطلب وقفة للمراجعة على طريق المساءلة والملاحقة الأخلاقية والقانونية”. وقال إن “وعد بلفور المشؤوم يعد جريمة كبرى بحق الشعب الفلسطيني وهي جريمة لا ينبغي أن تسقط بالتقادم ولو بعد مرور مائة عام”.
البداية كان تصريح بلفور
منذ نحو مائة عام وفي 2 تشرين الثاني (نوفمبر) 1917 أصدر وزير الخارجية البريطاني بلفور تصريحاً على شكل رسالة وجهها إلى اللورد روتشيلد، عرف هذا التصريح فيما بعد بوعد بلفور، وجاء فيه “أن حكومة جلالته تنظر بعين العطف إلى تأسيس وطن قومي لليهود في فلسطين، على أن يفهم بجلاء بأنه لا يؤتى أمر من شأنه أن يجحف بالحقوق المدنية والدينية للطوائف غير اليهودية الموجودة في فلسطين، أو بالحقوق والأوضاع التي يتمتع بها اليهود في أية بلاد أخرى”[3].
Hilarious. Glitter bombs are awesome
Do you reckon keir takes it up the Gary?
Kier wears glitter every day. 😆
This Europe today! And these glitter or cake throwers get passes! In law and order nation, they will be arrested for assault and will get punishment for it. If I was Starmer, I would have punched him in the nose!
bs
Word salad.
But far better than the verbal diarrhoea from the Tories.
@PanglossDr equally as vile, to be honest
I wonder if he'll get Gary Glitter off the hook like he did Jimmy Savile
IF you want to know about Jimmy Saville.....and HOW he was enabled to get away with his despicable behavior....LOOK at his Relationship with MARGARET THATCHER and the Tory party.....SHE lobbied for Saville to be made a 'SIR' despite being warned against AND Her Government gave him a FREE pass to get access to the Hospitals where he abused patients!!!
Isn't Glitter dead?
@@keithparker1346 nope
He didn't get Saville of the hook you deadbeat. Good pun though.
@@Paddythefriendlykiwi Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service at the time, it was on his watch that Savile was allowed to fall through the net.
First he gets his bestie, Savile off the hook. Now he's impersonating Gary Glitter at the conference.
Surprised he didn't finish his speech with a rousing rendition of "Tie Me Kangaroo Down Sport"
Spot on
😊🏴☠️🎈
Your one brain cell must be very lonely.
Not bad😂
Captain Beige, I can't even stand his ridiculous voice. Like being lectured by Brian Badonde.
Don't show your prejudice here, it's a public platform 😉
@@mattbrownartworkhow is it prejudiced to say someone is boring when all you have heard from them over the last few years is boring? You are being prejudiced cause you don't know how informed the commentor is in making their opinion of him as him boring.
Please God No! funkin communists
Communist? 😂 This guy is a centrist at a push
@@nectanbo no dude he's an elitist Blairite. n labour mp's are a bunch of commies
Look at the differences in coverage of the two conferences- one attacking, lying, questioning, ridiculing; the other; tame, defensive, and attempting to paint in a decent light- we see right through it, C4.
I mean we have right to be skeptical about the tories
@@eddyland1557 ...and Labour?
@@adarkimpurity they haven't been in government for the past 13 years, so none of the country's problems can be laid onto them.
@eddyland1557
Problem is Labour would do the same as the Tories policy wise.
@@isengard1500 nah, Tories would let NIMBYs have their way and Labour would completely ignore them
Cant even secure a podium but still wants the Public to trust him with everything else 😂
???
What EXACTLY do you want from him?
I mean, you struggle with information and grammar but still think you write effective comments?
Fascinating.
Is this genuinely what you've got 🤦♂️ because the security at the venue wasn't good that means starmers government wouldn't be able to run a government. What happened in your life to lead to this point?
@@Alex-cw3rz erm…
The tories have been confronted by protesters more often, more effectively, so they must be LESS SECURE.
I mean.. they climbed all over Sunak’s house… where were you then??
@@Alex-cw3rz show me in the job description of the Labour leader, where it says they must also be their own security.
I’ll wait.
We will all wait for you to show us that paragraph. Fill yer boots.
You should be celebrating the fact that protest was so easy at the Labour conference mate.
..but that would be intelligent, wouldn’t it.
We stand with our Israel friends 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇮🇱
So inspiring he got Lineker to stand up eleven times clapping.. Last time that happened was at the immigration welcoming party at folkestone..
外国人にお金の支援するなよ、わざと戦争ビジネスやめなさい