What Does it Take to Make a Universe? - with Harry Cliff

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 июн 2024
  • What is matter really made of? How does the stuff around us escape annihilation in the fearsome heat of the Big Bang? And will we ever be able to understand the very first moments of our universe?
    Watch the Q&A: • Q&A: What Does it Take...
    Harry's book "How to Make an Apple Pie from Scratch" is available now: geni.us/harrycliff
    Using the latest experimental data from the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva and labs and observatories around the world, including a neutrino detector buried a kilometre under an Italian mountain to a gravitational wave detector nestled in the humid pine forest of Louisiana, particle physicist Harry Cliff will reveal what the newest findings tell us about the the fundamental ingredients of matter and their origins.
    Harry Cliff is a particle physicist at the University of Cambridge working on the LHCb experiment, a huge particle detector buried 100 metres underground at CERN near Geneva. He is a member of an international team of around 1400 physicists, engineers and computer scientists who are using LHCb to study the basic building blocks of our universe, in search of answers to some of the biggest questions in modern physics.
    This talk was recorded on 10 August 2021.
    ---
    A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
    Abdelkhalek Ayad, Martin Paull, Ben Wynne-Simmons, Ivo Danihelka, Hamza, Paulina Barren, Metzger, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, János Fekete, Mehdi Razavi, Mark Barden, Taylor Hornby, Rasiel Suarez, Stephan Giersche, William 'Billy' Robillard, Scott Edwardsen, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Gou Ranon, Christina Baum, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Adam Leos, Michelle J. Zamarron, Andrew Downing, Fairleigh McGill, Alan Latteri, David Crowner, Matt Townsend, Anonymous, Robert Reinecke, Paul Brown, Lasse T. Stendan, David Schick, Joe Godenzi, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Greg Nagel, and Rebecca Pan.
    ---
    Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
    The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
    and Twitter: / ri_science
    and Facebook: / royalinstitution
    and Tumblr: / ri-science
    Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
    Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
    Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 352

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  2 года назад +65

    We are so pleased and honoured to have been able to launch our friend Harry Cliff's new book in our newly reopened lecture theatre!

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 2 года назад +1

      Is there any way I can know when was this lecture was conducted, I read the description but there was no clue about it.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 2 года назад +2

      @@harshadadagale4253 Recorded 10 August 2021, now in the description.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 2 года назад

      So happy to see the lecture hall again!

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 2 года назад +1

      @@Ni999 thanks

    • @ableone7855
      @ableone7855 2 года назад +2

      Harry Cliff is one of the best lecturers you host at the Royal Institute. Smart, humorous and a very good scientist. Great style and presentation. Have him back soon, please.

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t 2 года назад +51

    *Harry Cliff* is great, please record new videos with him.
    Thank you so much *RI*

  • @lordofelectrons4513
    @lordofelectrons4513 2 года назад +6

    Apple pie recipe: Warm oven to 10^15 degrees add well ripened matter bake for
    9.3 billion years remove from oven allow to cool for 4.5 billion years then serve.

  • @marcusm6104
    @marcusm6104 2 года назад +20

    One of the best communicators in science. Thank you!

  • @notayoutuber3518
    @notayoutuber3518 2 года назад +11

    I had an emotional reaction when I finally understood the concept of quantum fields during this video. I had to remove my glasses from my face and cat from my lap and just absorb this for a long moment.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 2 года назад +27

    How to make an apple pie from scratch: First make a universe.

  • @mighty8357
    @mighty8357 2 года назад +48

    Harry Cliff is such a fantastic lecturer! The way he talks and keep the attention of the audience is amazing to watch.

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад +2

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

    • @Danoz_die_wreckt
      @Danoz_die_wreckt 11 месяцев назад

      He’s easy to listen to.

  • @pwincess747
    @pwincess747 2 года назад +7

    Keep the Harry Cliff content coming please thanks 🙂

  • @katcandoo
    @katcandoo 2 года назад +4

    Harry Cliff has become one of my favorite presenters. Thank you for all the presentations on this wonderful site. First class!

  • @shaheryaar
    @shaheryaar 2 года назад +3

    what a lecture, what a lecture. An hour well spent.

  • @hackcrew42
    @hackcrew42 2 года назад +3

    Another Harry Cliff lecture, finally!! Live as well wow what a treat

  • @kevinmccarthy8746
    @kevinmccarthy8746 2 года назад +4

    LOVE YOUR SHOW. GREAT SUBJECT. I saw your show concerning Particle fields, fantastic. Thank you.

  • @R037k
    @R037k 2 года назад +5

    what an incredible amount of information must there be in those strange fields. just wow.

  • @hassannabil9792
    @hassannabil9792 2 года назад +4

    Excellent presentation. Thanks for providing it.

  • @rafaqathussain2131
    @rafaqathussain2131 2 года назад +7

    Amazing job to share this incredible knowledge with all of us and to make it digestible for people like me who have little understanding of this highly advanced field of sience.

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 2 года назад +1

    This guy is the best explainer of current particle physics and admits our flawed concepts regards Higgs @31:45

    • @candidobertetti27
      @candidobertetti27 Год назад +1

      He also explains how those flaws were addressed and fixed.

  • @kinnaribhalerao8112
    @kinnaribhalerao8112 2 года назад +4

    Amazing! I'm an engineering student but physics never fails to fascinate me. Solace at it's best!

  • @bipolarbear9917
    @bipolarbear9917 2 года назад +31

    "The Cosmos is within us. We are made of star stuff. Star stuff contemplating the stars" - Carl Sagan

    • @super_ficial
      @super_ficial 2 года назад

      A universe being created is not only redundant it is deliberately misleading. There is only Creation.

    • @aurelienyonrac
      @aurelienyonrac 2 года назад

      Are you a body, or do you have a body?
      You are unfathomable. (Can't measure)

    • @super_ficial
      @super_ficial 2 года назад

      @@aurelienyonrac My ego tells me that I am a body, but I know better. I've seen four primary color and I've been aloft of my, 'Made the the USA' ephemeral body.
      I'm looking forwards to giving up this Ghost.
      (You sure know the right questions to ask).
      God bless and stand tall.

    • @lancenowlin1571
      @lancenowlin1571 2 года назад

      P

  • @michaeltaylor6133
    @michaeltaylor6133 2 года назад +5

    Thank you very much, that was a very enjoyable lecture.

  • @ableone7855
    @ableone7855 2 года назад +6

    Great presentation by the lecturer. Look forward to more presentations by this presenter,

  • @canvey555
    @canvey555 2 года назад +1

    Welcome back guys, great talk

  • @martenwillemhaven
    @martenwillemhaven 2 месяца назад

    Really great accessible explanation of complex matter with great enthusiasm!

  • @geeky_explorer9105
    @geeky_explorer9105 2 года назад +1

    The best part of his lecture are he tells Stories and connects almost every beats of physics

  • @germanpenn
    @germanpenn 2 года назад +20

    I was between this lecture and “how to make a cliff” by Harry Universe. I’m glad I chose this one

    • @trupyrodice4462
      @trupyrodice4462 2 года назад

      Lol, excellent. I wonder tho, what instruments, maths, and techniques were used to predict and detect the particles in a Cliff that Dr. Universe utilized compile his book. I suppose we just have to watch that lecture as well. Cheers

  • @MutsPub
    @MutsPub Год назад +1

    Well done.
    Thank you.

  • @YankeeTankee
    @YankeeTankee Год назад +1

    Harry Cliff takes on a difficult but very interesting topic. Well preaented! Thank you Ri!

  • @Bobbias
    @Bobbias 2 года назад +10

    I remember watching the Higgs announcement live. I was amazed at how well I understood the presentations as a lay person. Witnessing the announcement live, seeing the graphs and realizing how long it took to answer that question made for quite an experience.

  • @fastman119
    @fastman119 2 года назад +4

    Love watching this guy's physics talks

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

  • @LeonidKornikov
    @LeonidKornikov 2 года назад +1

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @samsoneczek
    @samsoneczek 2 года назад +10

    Fantastic! As always! Thank God for Royal Institution! Everybody need some magic in this strange world.

  • @lilianaordonez5474
    @lilianaordonez5474 Месяц назад

    I watch his videos on my 81" TV, and it looks awesome! Thank you very much for breaking it down for regular people like me and my family. We are fascinated with his brilliant presenta, and we're learning a lot from you Mr Harry....

  • @jimbernard8964
    @jimbernard8964 4 месяца назад

    This lecture is solid gold! Thanks. I don't know the details of this but it seems a crying shame that the lecture hall seems about only half full.

  • @darrellee8194
    @darrellee8194 2 года назад +1

    When I clicked I was hoping it would be back in the auditorium and it Is! Hooray!

  • @reallyryan_
    @reallyryan_ 2 года назад

    This was brilliant! :D

  • @humlakullen
    @humlakullen 2 года назад +4

    Great... So, when does consciousness enter the picture in the evolution of the universe?

  • @bigbear7567
    @bigbear7567 2 года назад

    Very entertaining and interesting video.

  • @RFC-3514
    @RFC-3514 2 года назад +5

    11:02 - Well, if it "increased as the square of the distance", it would become stronger as they got further away, not closer. It's actually _inversely_ proportional to the square of the distance (and directly proportional to the product of the charges).

  • @Beroanimation72
    @Beroanimation72 2 года назад +1

    So interesting for your presentation, thank you so much. Where can I buy your book?

    • @TheRoyalInstitution
      @TheRoyalInstitution  2 года назад +2

      This will take you to your local Amazon - geni.us/harrycliff - but many independent book stores also stock it!

  • @hamburgerlord9552
    @hamburgerlord9552 2 года назад +1

    Great video🤘

  • @strikkmoez
    @strikkmoez 2 года назад

    Amazing talk.

  • @brettbrannon4775
    @brettbrannon4775 2 года назад +2

    This was a great video and the speaker was even better at explaining and keeping it interesting😁

  • @ranilany8646
    @ranilany8646 4 месяца назад

    Fantastic talk!

  • @andreasgeorgiou5276
    @andreasgeorgiou5276 2 года назад +37

    A very interesting talk. I think Democritus is judged a bit harshly since the man lived 2500 years ago. Very little of his atomic hypothesis has survived to be seriously assessed, but as with many ancient Greek philosophers whose admirable speculations on the natural world certainly marks the beginning of humankind’s enquiry, it is not so much what they achieved but what they attempted. If anything, successors to these early speculators are far more guilty for not taking up and developing the more promising of these early ideas. The Atomic hypothesis of Democritus is reportedly a very small part of his total output, which also included contributions in mathematics, ethics, politics, biology, cosmology etc. In any-case, it was 2000 years later before any real scientific process was made. Give him his due! This is not to take away any credit from John Dalton’s great contribution to chemistry.

    • @Dan-zq5wt
      @Dan-zq5wt Год назад +2

      I had the same immediate reaction! I thought that was an unfair comment. Democritus was probably a genius. However, I do like this speaker!

    • @karthikshiva9801
      @karthikshiva9801 Год назад +1

      Taking nothing away from Democritus and his fellow Greek philosophers, it's a bit of a strech to claim that their thoughts & speculations marks humankind's enquiry 😂😂
      Lot of other cultures including some from the cradle itself started this exploration from way before

    • @andreasgeorgiou5276
      @andreasgeorgiou5276 Год назад +4

      @@karthikshiva9801 No doubt other cultures contributed to human knowledge, much lost to history. It is open to question, but it is generally accepted that this period in Greece marks the most important development in human enquiry.

    • @candidobertetti27
      @candidobertetti27 Год назад +1

      It's fascinating how even the smartest people are overwhelmed by their national pride. He had to dismiss Democritus as a mere windbag and replace him by Englishman John Dalton, who lived more than two thousand years later. Amazing.

  • @sophiebarbara4111
    @sophiebarbara4111 2 года назад +8

    When can we expect Harry Cliff in the RI theatre again?

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

  • @garydecad6233
    @garydecad6233 Год назад

    Excellent presentation

  • @MichaelMonterey
    @MichaelMonterey 2 года назад +1

    Uh, excuse me, but the CERN experiments left out a few prerequisites: 1 - a pre-existent source of energy, 2 - a pre-energy process for forming forms & modes, 3 - a pre-existing cause of the previous prerequisites (of existence & expansion/explosion), 4 - pre-existing forms, properties & processes that enable expansive/explosive action/reaction, 5 - pre-existing causes of motion, implosion, expansion/explosion, etc., 6 - pre-causal sources/processes to endow the tiniest forms of form with powers, etc., 7 - pre-existent principles & qualities of being that enabled & sustain everything, 8 - pre-natural causes for everything existing in a the tiniest possible point of nothingness in the middle nowhere, 9 - existential causes of a sudden expansion of nothingness to the size of a tennis ball then, without definite causes, to become an ongoing explosion of everything (at least 93 billion LY in diameter, so far), and 10 - a cause of belief in a SM QM cosmology that ignores the preceding 9 prerequisites of being, existence, AKA reality. >
    So, a real recipe for a universe of being, its nature & energy has to start with nonphysical thus changelessly reliable enabling principles.

  • @matthewdolan5831
    @matthewdolan5831 2 года назад

    Nice one 👍

  • @pilotactor777
    @pilotactor777 2 года назад

    Great immitation of Carl Sagan!!! You had me at that moment!!!

  • @lumidoo8753
    @lumidoo8753 Год назад

    Great lecture 👌

  • @asrajan55
    @asrajan55 2 года назад

    How come there are no question answer sessions after these lectures like you have in the U.S?

  • @taymazdizali1894
    @taymazdizali1894 Год назад

    Perfect for understanding the universe.

  • @charlesaeneas
    @charlesaeneas 2 года назад +3

    I'm making my way through the book which is extremely readable and makes more sense than most books I've read about particle physics or quantum mechanics. I am overawed by the sheer unwoldliness of it all!

  • @LairdJ56
    @LairdJ56 2 года назад

    I want that book for Christmas 👏👏👏

  • @thewaythingsare8158
    @thewaythingsare8158 2 года назад +1

    I am almost halfway through the book and it too is beautifully fluid and engaging - quite a skill for what you might imagine would be a very challenging subject.
    Am getting smarter by the page. Thought the cover was a bit naff so covered it with a Hubble deep field printout instead....might paste a mr Kipling floating in it later

    • @ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113
      @ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113 2 года назад

      Put some "Pigs, In Space", in there, please. Just in time for Pigstmas! How about "Ren and Stimpy" and/or "Newt Gingrinch", just in time for Newt Year! Mr. Kipling wearing a William Shatner Rug? "Rugyard Kipling." No?

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 Год назад

    THANK YOU...!!!

  • @TheJesusr1
    @TheJesusr1 2 года назад +1

    Excellent presenter!

  • @briankepner7569
    @briankepner7569 2 года назад +2

    The standard model idea makes sense to me but if I was a physicist trying to figure it out, in the same way that I repair cars I always tend to end up with important looking bits left over that I have no idea where they go. Sure the car will run but I do keep those bits in a box in the back just in case.
    Yes I'm not a physicist but I love these lectures

  • @bryandraughn9830
    @bryandraughn9830 2 года назад +8

    55:10*perpendicular
    Lol!
    This is so awesome!! Progress is happening after such a long period of hitting walls!
    LIGO and the James Webb telescope are going to provide much needed data. I might be able to witness more advancements before......y'know.

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 2 года назад +1

      Yes he said parallel but the rest of the talk was correct I suppose

  • @zoozolplexOne
    @zoozolplexOne 11 месяцев назад

    Very good talk

  • @charlesandrews2419
    @charlesandrews2419 2 года назад

    Food for thought...
    As we ponder the recipe for the universe.
    We are all star stuff.

  • @mileshall9235
    @mileshall9235 9 месяцев назад

    Nice little decoration in the background. Looks like Sol Lewitt.

  • @Eztoez
    @Eztoez 2 года назад

    I wish someone would text that bloke behind him to show a little respect to Professor Cliff and put his cellphone down. He's been looking at it the entire time.

  • @colleenforrest7936
    @colleenforrest7936 2 года назад +1

    About Inflation... What would be the difference between something happening really fast vs something happening at a slower rate but nothing or very little changed during that time and then fell off the horizon of what we could detect?

  • @ilymortygivegrandpaakiss5231
    @ilymortygivegrandpaakiss5231 2 года назад +2

    Wonderful 🍎

  • @lucyoldfield1578
    @lucyoldfield1578 2 года назад +2

    I feel the likelihood of a multiverse is very real ⚡️🔥🌟

  • @JohnDlugosz
    @JohnDlugosz 2 года назад +6

    Guest to grillmaster: What kind of charcoal is this, Willow?
    Grillmaster: No, apple pie.

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 2 года назад

      Lol had to get 6 minutes into lecture to get this humour

  • @pineapplepenumbra
    @pineapplepenumbra 2 года назад +2

    43:06 Beauty is fleeting....

  • @zerodivider4333
    @zerodivider4333 2 года назад

    Back in the lecture theater. Woot woot.

  • @paulbrookes413
    @paulbrookes413 2 года назад

    TREE OF KNOWLEDGE

  • @geeky_explorer9105
    @geeky_explorer9105 2 года назад +1

    Long waited lecture

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 2 года назад +1

    Indeed, to make an apple pie you need to make a universe. Maldacena (21st century Einstein) conjectured that the universe is a QC function, error correcting, coherent and deterministic, implying divine purpose (not Sagan's accident). And before you cook your apple pie, you need a finite axion algorithm, you will never get.

  • @aaronh.8230
    @aaronh.8230 2 года назад +5

    So, is matter (actually, mass) just an emergent property of energy slowing down?

    • @rustycherkas8229
      @rustycherkas8229 2 года назад +3

      If so, then we are all, basically, made of light!!
      Still doesn't explain why some are 'brighter' than others, though...

  • @SzTz100
    @SzTz100 2 года назад +1

    Harry, I didn't recognise you with the beard. Great lecture as usual.

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 года назад

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 2 года назад +3

    _"There is a whole bunch of other particles we don't really understand why they exist"_ means you don't understand the how the model works! So how can you be so sure you understand where it came from?

  • @afriedrich1452
    @afriedrich1452 2 года назад +1

    I seems that physicists were not computing the properties of the muon correctly in the past. This seems to explain the g-2 anomaly and may also explain the LHCb anomaly.

  • @Zorlof
    @Zorlof 2 года назад +2

    Since the spectrum from antimatter is identical to matter, how do we know there are no antimatter galaxies out there?

  • @gospelofthomas77thpearl22
    @gospelofthomas77thpearl22 2 года назад

    The bits of the recipe that are missing are in 77th Pearl: The Perpetual Tree. 🖖🏼

  • @stevoofd
    @stevoofd 2 года назад

    43:17 so quarks turn into Tetris blocks?

  • @macroman52
    @macroman52 2 года назад

    The quantum fields sound a bit like the 19century ether. Didn't Helmholtz think of an atom as a vortex in the "ether fluid"?

  • @ngDetecter
    @ngDetecter 5 месяцев назад

    generous introduction: 0:00
    😁

  • @bad-bunnyblogger8171
    @bad-bunnyblogger8171 2 года назад +1

    If nothing exists to observe a universe. Does the universe cease to exist.
    Maybe life and consciousness plays a bigger role?

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d 2 года назад

    Higgs field is the Inertial plane.
    Casimir Effect;
    Space and Counterspace, Electrons and Positrons are the plates,. The near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane, attracts and repels the plates.
    Scalable Aether Universe!

  • @busyhive2346
    @busyhive2346 2 года назад +5

    I always ask myself how is it even possible that our teachers are able to make science such a boring subject - there is nothing more exciting than science as a subject - it should be a mandatory subject - it represents the “ language of our existence” .

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 2 года назад

      Schools within imperial systems capitalists or not are not made to educate you they’re made to make you good workers. They’re there to get you used to suffering. That’s why I have you look at most famous scientist there either a the children of rich people or they had some really important mentor in their life on top of being smart(lucky)

    • @loftsatsympaticodotc
      @loftsatsympaticodotc 2 года назад +1

      @@manmarvel This dystopian view is hard to digest; i.e. not true whatsoever! As someone who spent 20 years studying at 4 different institutions, this could not be further from the truth. In deed the liberal arts schools do not emphasize practical trades. If you want to become a blacksmith, or plumber, or "put-part-A-into-hole-B" production line worker,, the LAST place you would find this is our universities or even high schools. You are maybe thinking of a 'trade school'? Even there the mysterires of material science are well displayed for analysis.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 2 года назад

      @@loftsatsympaticodotc i dont know man, i think were talking like elementary middle and highschool here.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 2 года назад

      by the time your in college you ususally love what you are learning.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 2 года назад

      @@loftsatsympaticodotc problem is most people never fall in love with learning, hence my 1st comment.

  • @euclidofalexandria3786
    @euclidofalexandria3786 10 месяцев назад

    9:02 secs do photons have a veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery small mass? complexity thresholds and coalescence of slowed light into matter. Compactification can be seen in the 5 fundamental nodes of plasma movement... compactification of enegy and volume can be studied and foresite can be used as well...

  • @jasonprotell8976
    @jasonprotell8976 2 года назад +2

    14:35 "when I was a PhD student, my office was in um, I have to be careful what I say because my boss is here, my office was in a windowless room underneath the men's 1st-floor toilets which frequently leaked, and the feeling of water dripping unexpectedly onto my head still gives me sort of panic attacks"
    I don't know if Harry Cliff is joking or being serious here, but that actually sounds miserable; if he's really having panic attacks, I hope he finds a good therapist.
    Anyway I'm looking forward to reading his new book. If it's anything like the lectures, it'll be an accessible, educational, and entertaining perspective on the recipe for the cosmos. Hopefully there are some interesting stories from LHCb as well!

  • @foodhead4677
    @foodhead4677 2 года назад

    Asking the question is different than having the correct answer

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d 2 года назад

    From the near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane out the electron vortex. Pulses from Counterspace create shells of tau, muon, electron.
    "The smaller the spacial footprint, the higher the capacitance."
    "The higher the gauss, the smaller its field."

  • @NickAbbot.
    @NickAbbot. 2 года назад

    @44:00 Indirectly, he refers to gravity as a force.

  • @ishmaelforester9825
    @ishmaelforester9825 2 года назад

    in earthling, 'I am that I am. Tell them I am has sent you. '

  • @MOHD_SARWARE_ALAM
    @MOHD_SARWARE_ALAM 2 года назад +1

  • @RupertBruce
    @RupertBruce 2 года назад +1

    So the Higgs Field distorts space time that then distorts the path of photons even though photons are not affected by the Higgs Field themselves?

    • @luciddewseed3095
      @luciddewseed3095 2 года назад

      yups

    • @radishpineapple74
      @radishpineapple74 2 года назад +5

      Any kind of confined interaction represents mass. A photon has no rest mass, but if you put it into a perfect mirrored box, then even though it's bouncing around at the speed of light, from a distance the box appears to have a photon that's basically at rest since it's not moving out of the box. The photon box thus has a confined interaction (photon with the walls of the box) and it has a mass proportional to the number of photons in the box, due to E=mc^2. Also, the more tightly confined the photons, the smaller their wavelength must be, and thus the more mass the box has (this comes from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle). This is how protons and neutrons get most of their mass: they are systems of tightly confined quarks and gluons which have little to no mass themselves, but because they're stuck in a tiny "box", they have significant mass. By the way, this same thing does apply to other confined systems like electrons in an atom, but because the forces involved are quite weak, this confined interaction mass is negligible. Electrons themselves are always engaging in an interaction with the Higgs field which changes a particular property back and forth at a tremendous frequency. Electrons cannot escape this interaction because the Higgs field has a positive value everywhere; if not for this interaction, electrons would retain one of these values until colliding with another discrete particle. Thus electrons are constantly in a confined "box" of interaction created by the Higgs field. This means that electrons have mass even if they're not apparently interacting with anything, because actually they're always interacting with the Higgs field at a high frequency. Finally, any mass causes a curvature in spacetime. You can think of photons as always going in straight lines, with what counts as "straight" being distorted by mass. You can also think of photons as interacting with anything with mass. Both views are equivalent so long as they arrive at the same answer, so it's a matter of taste which way you'd prefer to think about it.

  • @euclidofalexandria3786
    @euclidofalexandria3786 10 месяцев назад

    remember too that radiation can be due to internal complexity, and / or surface complexity upon a knot, diffable not continuuous however...
    its both, especially under different scaling lengths.

  • @Locreai
    @Locreai Год назад

    We live in a hyper dimensional soundwave universe and the coalescence, trough, crest, and crash of frequencies drop out the sound waves into matter.

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 2 года назад

    (Stuff+Things)Force=Universe

  • @ianmburke
    @ianmburke 2 года назад

    54:30 *** perpendicular

  • @lucyoldfield1578
    @lucyoldfield1578 2 года назад

    Ripples intersect 🌟

  • @VladyslavKL
    @VladyslavKL 2 года назад

    🕊

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure 2 года назад

    It takes the introduction of energy into AntiDeSitter which caused deviation of lines into curves and suddenly all of the points wanted to be at the same place. But identity prevents and so the universe created an infinitesimal . And since there are infinite points on the surface of an infinitesimal there was room for everything but there was a lines of points behind that infinity that also wanted to be at that place so the universe spun that infinitesimal creating an infinitesimal moment of time which infinity can share for a moment before giving another different infinity a chance to share that surface.
    Neutron decay cosmology.
    The neutrons which invert at transition from neutron star to event horizon move through infinitesimal time to the lowest energy points of the universe (deep voids) where they decay into amorphous hydrogen. This is a 10^14 increase in size. This is the expansion of the universe. The very difficult to detect amorphous atomic hydrogen is dark matter.
    That and the fact that the Friedman equation should be done using a thixotropic fluid not a perfect/ideal fluid. Ideal fluids don’t vary in density. Space does.

    • @Just.A.T-Rex
      @Just.A.T-Rex 2 года назад

      The difference in density in space time is nil. If the universe was the size of the earth it would be smoother than a billiard ball.

  • @davidbrisbane7206
    @davidbrisbane7206 2 года назад

    How to make an apple pie from nothing. Start with apples.

  • @war-in-youforyou9105
    @war-in-youforyou9105 2 года назад +1

    Electron Flood Theory