Question 3, the answer you provided is correct but the stimulus prompt is a position prompt not a movement prompt. A movement prompt is a movement made by the teacher ( pointing, touching, or looking at the sport card). Position prompt involves positioning the card closer to the student. Btw, l really like your videos guys, l have watched almost all of them! Thank you so much !
question 2 I don't understand how the answer can be A Generalized conditioned reinforcers, It has to be C because when the child goes into other settings their good behavior not give the classroom dollars , therefore the reinforcer is paired with school making it secondary.
They are secondary reinforcers which just means learned . But, you do want to memorize that tokens in a token economy that are that can be exchanged for a variety of different items are considered generalized conditioned reinforcers. Tokens that are exchanged for one item are considered just conditioned reinforcers. You are not wrong and I like how you are thinking. Sometimes words seemed to bee used in more than one way which can be very confusing. That's why the answer here is generalized conditioned reinforcers.
Thank you for this video! I love that I just found this task list review and collab. It's been a great study tool :) Question on #2: I originally selected GCR but was then deterred away from it because it was described as "classroom" money which does not generalize outside of the classroom's store items. Could you provide clarification on this? Is it still GCR because it's insinuating that the kids could select a number of items within the store? Hope this makes sense!
Yes. Examples of Generalized reinforcing items are praise, tokens, and money. (classroom money is a sort of token to exchange for anything from cool-looking pencils to an extra break or eating lunch with the teacher)
I had a question on my last exam that asked if the scenario was "both stimulus and response generalization." Just for clarity, will there ever be a situation where it would be both?
Yes for sure. I have many examples of both. If you are with a new person or in a new settin and you emitt a slightly different behavior that will achieve the same function as a previously trained behavior.
Oh sorry, of course on question 4. If a learner already makes the error, wouldn’t you then conduct an error correction procedure. In errorless teaching, ideally the learner would never give incorrect response.
@@fitbyife So the distinction here is since she was making a lot of errors- they used errorless learning so she can't continue to make errors. This refers to each trial individually. So an error correction refers to the consequence IMMEDIATELY following a specific error made on a discrete trial not changing the teaching procedure for future trials. Does that make sense?
Question 3, the answer you provided is correct but the stimulus prompt is a position prompt not a movement prompt. A movement prompt is a movement made by the teacher ( pointing, touching, or looking at the sport card). Position prompt involves positioning the card closer to the student. Btw, l really like your videos guys, l have watched almost all of them! Thank you so much !
You always make understanding easier! Thanks
my pleasure!
question 2 I don't understand how the answer can be A Generalized conditioned reinforcers, It has to be C because when the child goes into other settings their good behavior not give the classroom dollars , therefore the reinforcer is paired with school making it secondary.
They are secondary reinforcers which just means learned . But, you do want to memorize that tokens in a token economy that are that can be exchanged for a variety of different items are considered generalized conditioned reinforcers. Tokens that are exchanged for one item are considered just conditioned reinforcers. You are not wrong and I like how you are thinking. Sometimes words seemed to bee used in more than one way which can be very confusing. That's why the answer here is generalized conditioned reinforcers.
Thank you for this video! I love that I just found this task list review and collab. It's been a great study tool :)
Question on #2: I originally selected GCR but was then deterred away from it because it was described as "classroom" money which does not generalize outside of the classroom's store items. Could you provide clarification on this? Is it still GCR because it's insinuating that the kids could select a number of items within the store? Hope this makes sense!
Yes. Examples of Generalized reinforcing items are praise, tokens, and money. (classroom money is a sort of token to exchange for anything from cool-looking pencils to an extra break or eating lunch with the teacher)
I had a question on my last exam that asked if the scenario was "both stimulus and response generalization." Just for clarity, will there ever be a situation where it would be both?
Yes for sure. I have many examples of both. If you are with a new person or in a new settin and you emitt a slightly different behavior that will achieve the same function as a previously trained behavior.
Jess thanks for your videos they are very helpful
my pleasure!
Wouldn't this be considered error correction? As the learner already made the error
I am not sure what you are referring to! Can you be more specific?
Oh sorry, of course on question 4. If a learner already makes the error, wouldn’t you then conduct an error correction procedure. In errorless teaching, ideally the learner would never give incorrect response.
@@fitbyife So the distinction here is since she was making a lot of errors- they used errorless learning so she can't continue to make errors. This refers to each trial individually. So an error correction refers to the consequence IMMEDIATELY following a specific error made on a discrete trial not changing the teaching procedure for future trials. Does that make sense?
Do u still have intensives? I'm interested in doing some with u!!
Her B, D, and G intensives are now free if you purchase Jessica's Depp Dive 5 course.
For question 2, during your explanation I automatically thought of verbal operants