Suction dredge lawsuit update ICL v Poe Part 1 of 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @GSProspecting
    @GSProspecting 5 месяцев назад +1

    Loads of great info fam. Keep at it. Gold Squad Out 🤠

  • @irishviking76
    @irishviking76 4 месяца назад

    Watching closely, thank you

  • @americanminer1965
    @americanminer1965 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you for all your hard work Shannon! Its been a long road. Bob and I say hello 👋 and hope all is well

  • @divergentthinking8324
    @divergentthinking8324 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks man , I appreciate ya.

  • @jeffhays1968
    @jeffhays1968 5 месяцев назад +3

    9'th circus we call it.

  • @adventuresofaliftime4989
    @adventuresofaliftime4989 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you shannon for all your work. Please keep us updated we do appreciate all that you have done.

  • @jeffhays1968
    @jeffhays1968 5 месяцев назад +1

    En banc is the next route, full 9'th circuit panel is next. And like i said DECADES this was decided as NO ADDITION. How is this even possible with the earlier court ruling ?

  • @Kevin_Patrick001
    @Kevin_Patrick001 5 месяцев назад +1

    You should help clean the water and the stream by "removing mercury" contamination via dredging. Getting the gold would only be an unwanted by-product (sarcasm). You could probably get away with this as long as you call it mercury abatement.

  • @jeffhays1968
    @jeffhays1968 5 месяцев назад

    Love plf

  • @theskincartridge1234
    @theskincartridge1234 5 месяцев назад

    I'm still at a loss as to why they don't have to prove what you are adding to the water as their evidence for the entire lawsuit, without any evidence of adding any pollutants into the water any judge with a brain should throw the whole thing out immediately and admonish those persons for filing frivolous lawsuits and clogging up the court system. there are laws against filing frivolous lawsuits....

  • @richardbeee
    @richardbeee 5 месяцев назад

    They cut you ofg.