@@chimedemon Back when I made this video I usually only got ~30 views on a video and no comments. When you have no comments real viewers tend not to want to comment, so I made this comment as a joke just to liven up the comment section in the hopes that more people would drop comments. It's just a joke comment.
@@akaashanova I want to know only the base of idea not total technology. I am a inventer of carbon cutter machine N co-founder of P i green innovations. (India). I also have patent in 135 countries. My machine capture carbon from every disel exaust,( it's a retrofit device) But not gas . So any body on same path with good idea together we will make it.
Number 7: calcium carbonate accretion through electrolysis has an incredible ability to pull tones of carbon out of the sea. Furthermore, it could be used to repair existing or to create new reefs. This would create habitats for new marine eco systems to develop, thus removing even more carbon dioxide from the water. More marine habitats has an added bonus of creating more marine life, thereby helping to feed an ever growing population.
We are experiencing low levels of CO2 in our Earth than almost ever before. Plants thrive under these conditions. They also yield more fruit per square inch under higher CO2 levels. Plants naturally create oxygen and animals and plants live in harmony together. By the way, liquid CO2 is a refrigerant.
First of all there are no sources because it was all made up by some politicians back in the '80s and some secret meetings with Congress when they come up with the word global warming that's not real there's no climate change there's nothing wrong with the air until now they're pulling carbon dioxide out of it that's going to kill all the plants that will kill all of us.. and nobody's going to step up to the plate and do anything because the people are so stupid they have no idea of why we're going to die under the certain conditions of plans they have today it will certainly kill everyone of us in a short time and those who have half a brain will say no that's not true cuz the elite would die true with at least not going to die they got fallout shelters 2,000 feet down the biggest military bases that's ever been all tied together with tunnel systems and we're not allowed to be in there we're going to sit up here and suffocate and Dodge hailstones and meteorites when Nemesis comes back around the Sun so it's already too late everything is happening now is irreversible we've already lost two more percent of oxygen in our air we're down to critical now and we've dropped the CO2 levels again to they're almost the bare minimum for plants to live now so I figure about 2 years at the rate we're going now and get everybody to help destroy us that's what everybody's doing right now they're they're leading right up to our own murders and that's I call it murder cuz these people are doing this s*** they know what's going to happen they they took sixth grade science class same as I did that's when we learned how plants make photosynthesis but that's not talking skills today I'm finding out that students aren't taught anything but had a contradict you and b**** at you for not crossing your keys and your eyes cuz they don't know if goddamn thing about science math or history Nice people very easy to make too manipulate... Of all the emissions and all that inner gas and rare gases in our atmosphere along with all the carbon dioxide in the entire Earth atmosphere consists of 0.98% is all the emissions from burning fossil fuels since the beginning of time and all those super tons and 800 tons and millions of tons of carbon dioxide this m************ c********* in this video said there is as he is a lying son of a b**** cuz every time it rains horses all that back down in the dirt because they told amount entire universe around us everything that we know of the only carbon dioxide that we have is 0.030 of 1%. That's from everything that's all there is and if you cut this number in half all vegetation on planet Earth will water and die as a matter of fact all the Sea algae in the North Atlantic Ocean is dead already from lack of carbon dioxide and it was said that sea allege produce 75% of the oxygen when he breathe and it's showing up in the percentages of air samples as now we have went from 21.9% oxygen in our air down to 20% in the last 4 years if we drop one more half a percent which will be 19.5 the human race will begin to wither and die same as the plants are now that we're going to help everything by taking all the carbs up because it'll help us want it it sure will it helps us right into the God damn grave where the elite wants to be not only have the sheeples turned into battling zombies who are just taking up space for nothing worthless now they have become an instrument of our death and murders
Well yeah, "Compost carbon content" is tough to say, but just try saying "Creating clever content communicating carbon capturing cultivates climate consciousness" three times fast!
All forests don’t pull CO2 out of the air: old growth can, in fact, be a net CO2 emitter when fungal wood decay returns CO2 back into the air. Regenerating forests do absorb a lot of CO2-but only until they reach their capacity. Managing forests for most efficient CO2 absorption is better than letting forests live to their oldest, pre-decadent state. But once they get old, forests are not as good at storing CO2 as you suggest: old-growth is either not growing very fast (not absorbing CO2) or has become decadent (decay is releasing more CO2 than the stand is absorbing since it’s not really growing much, if at all).
On the whole those old forests would still have absorbed more CO2 over their life time correct? But definitely true we need proper forest management in conjunction with more trees!
Please do not store carbon dioxide and they do not put carbon dioxide into the soil This is a totally untrue account of the reaction of photosynthesis.. now I'm finding out that science biology and chemistry are not mandate of any school so most students don't volunteer to learn anything about what this man is lying to you about in this video
Not a problem neon much and Bill Gates and other billionaires are removing all the carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere as we speak and the results are blatantly showing all over the world as all plants are beginning to die resulting in oxygen levels dropping to critical today and soon you and every person man woman child on planet Earth will suffocate that means you'll be dead you know like in a pine box during the during the Great dirt nap forever... So thank you for your support and volunteering to end your life as all others are doing that is a great joy to people like Bill Gates who has been looking for population control as this is the best way possible as you're doing it yourself for them so they don't even have to be responsible
You are possibly throwing away millions of dollars worth of carbon dioxide is Elon Musk is removing all of it from the atmosphere with machinery and then bottling it up and selling it back to the farmers so their plants don't die pretty good scam don't you think that's better than the gangsters breaking your legs if you won't buy their insurance
CO2 isn't making the oceans more acidic, it's making the ocean less ionic or less basic or less alkaline, but in order to become more acidic it would have to be acidic in the first place, which the oceans are not! When the pH level drops to 6.9, by all means call the oceans acidic, and when it drops to 6.8, by all means say the oceans are becoming more acidic. Average ocean pH level is 8.2 - not acidic at all.
Becoming less basic is by definition becoming more acidic. It doesn't need to be acidic to become more acidic because it's a sliding log scale. Even at a pH of 11 there is still some acidic characteristic (ie there are hydronium ions)
@@EverythingScience absolutely not. The pH scale is 0 - 14, 7 being neutral: below 7 is acidic. Above 7 is alkaline. Read a book before you comment on things you don't understand. Without Terminology and definition, language loses meaning. Just to clarify, how is it exactly that water with a pH level over 7 can be acidic and alkaline, when it hasn't gone through the neutral stage to even start to become acidic? Alkaline and acidic are opposites, even though that have similar effects, not traits.
@@robertwitkowski6920This is what little knowledge looks like. Do you know what is the parameter that governs acidity or alkalinity? Do you know what exactly pH means? When you don't understand the exact scientific concept and basis of those, that's when you get this misdirected by the rot understanding of terminology
Politicians: Pay me to reduce Carbon Emissions Reality: I'm going to use your money to wipe out rain forests and farms for windmills, solarfarms and biofuel farms so I can charge you more for electricity and fuels.
All solutions that does not involving planting more plants sounds like they could have catastrophic results because we're using machines to "pull co2" from the environment. Don't forget, plants live on the stuff.
Today im seeing co2 levels reported at 0.03% carbon dioxide ..at this low level plants suffer and starve to death ..trees and plants are dieing ...the oxygen level is dropping fast to now 20% as dieing and dead plants do not produce oxygen as well as live plants ..if our oxygen level drop to 19.5% ..people will begin dropping dead ..we are loosing oxygen at a rate of 1% in six months ..at this rate we have about 90 left to live . Then we are dead from suffocation ..due to the co2 removal that will kill every living organism on earth to a complete extinction of all life on earth ..
I think maybe we could turn every air conditioner into a CO2 scrubber and perhaps the C02 that was captured could maybe even be used to fertilize soil. AC units move a lot of sit and this seems like a no-brainer.
Just make sure it stays above the limit when plants cannot breath any longer. CO2 is the source of carbon for all life on earth. H2O is the source of hydrogen. We had CO2 5 times as much as now a long time ago when life was flourishing on planet earth. Do not destroy it.
Well im pretty sure all the individuals that will be dying or suffering heat exhaustion tomorrow and Tuesday in england because of climate change arent gonna care much about that🤷♀️
Here we go again: 0:01 Why do so many people still insist on illustrating CO2 emissions or other pollutants by showing cooling towers whose only emission is clouds of water droplets. FYI Even nuclear power stations have cooling towers. Just makes me question the intelligence and knowledge of the presenter / content provider If they can’t tell the difference between H20 and CO2.
Unofrutnaltey when this video was made the channel was very small and wasn't monetized and we were very limited in what video clips we had permissions to use.
Those nuclear power plant stacks produce water vapor. Water vapor is more conducive to trapping heat than co2 ,the nuclear power plant cooling tunnels discharge heated water into the oceans , heating the surrounding waters
I beleive that discs with holes in them passing electricity could convert co2 in the atmosphere into water and sugar. But thats just what I know so far about it. It would have to be just before the ozone layer to remove the amount trapped there
The Earth is 4.6 Billion years old. I doubt it needs privilege people trying to micro manage it to feel better about themselves. They should show us how much they care by planting trees, or inventing new technology. Im one of those people that looks at actions not words which usually ticks off the people with only words. lol
yep, I addressed this in other comments but back when this video was made we were so small and you need to license footage so we just didn't have the money to access a wide variety of visual clips.
‘’1.5 Million Tons per year’’ apart from the fact that mass monoculture Trees would be needed that are replacing & destroying Ecosystems, and at the moment many old growth forests are being burned in these Biomass power stations. The CO2 captured is only a fraction of the CO2 emissions released in transportation, pellet making, loss of Wild Forest Land etc. The ‘’1.5 Million Tons’’ is minuscule compared to what is needed and what could be sequestered just by using Algae to clean out waste water, which would permanently sequester approx 364 Million Tons p/a, with no need for the deep drilling to pressure CO2 into rock, which is more energy needed for that. The Biomass & Bio Oil from Algae is valuable as it can be made into numerous Carbon Neg/Eco Friendly products including Clean Burning Carbon Neg Bio Fuel, 1 Ton of Atmospheric CO2 permanently sequestered from every Barrel of Algae Oil.
What is photosynthesis bacteria? Photosynthesis is a process used to convert carbon dioxide and water to glucose and oxygen powered with solar energy and performed by chlorophyll. To my information, some bacteria use photosynthesis as a method pf gaining energy, as well as some plants and animals. But which one bacteria are you talking about? And wouldn’t it be much more important to care about all plants instead of just some species of bacteria?
The industry puts out CO2? We just got a CO2 level monitor in our small (rambler) house and were stunned how much humans output, just with two of us we have to open windows twice a day to keep the indoor air just at 'moderate' level. Worry about outside air when indoor air is 3-5 times worse? Global CO2 levels from the 1500s to today increased from around 280 to 410. In our house at the end of the day we measured over 1500 (!), this is when staying indoor all day and we know it's just us because when we are not home the levels actually go down - and we even have ceiling fans running all day all night circulating the air. Then we did some research and found that unventilated student dorm rooms averaged over 2000. More than 20% of school classrooms checked in Texas exceeded 3000 at the end of class! Check your CO2 levels indoor FIRST and make sure that is healthy.
We all gotta start small 😅. But we've also been growing really fast lately. Last month we were under 500 subs and it looks like we may cross 1k today! Thank you for the support, it really means a lot to us smaller channels.
That sounds like it would just be too energy intensive (especially compared to existing technologies). Between cooling air to get it into a liquid state then heating it back up to distill. Also, I don't think fractional distillation would work on something that is a gas at room temperature. Since in distillation you heat a liquid mixture and one part separates out into a gas then naturally condenses back down. The only way to have that maybe work is after the CO2 evaporates to then re-cool it to collect it, but then that's even more energy intensive, and what do you do with the frozen CO2. Keep it frozen forever? But I like the idea!
Yeah we need soda, the only soda that i can buy is from Bashkiria Russia where there was protests against digging their Kushtau mountain for soda production
The one technology I don't care for would be Fe fertilisation of the ocean. This is because it facilitate nitrogen & phosphorus activity----to the point of eutrophication which is not pretty.
Don’t plants breath carbon dioxide? Didn’t the Pleistocene period have ten times the amount of CO2 in the air then we do now? This was the most plant abundant period in earths history so then why do we not want more CO2 in the air? Wouldn’t this help to green the planet?
If we can find a way to undo the damage we've done on a steadily growing mass scale, then even if there are major holdouts that refuse to move on from fossil fuels, we'd be okay. This could be a good way to tackle the political messaging, since given how politicised climate action has become, many will refuse to move on from coal just because it's coal, even if renewable sources turn out to be more efficient and cheap as well as renewable.
I don't think I'm understanding your question. When water 'dissolves' CO2 it's not breaking it apart, it's just 'absorbing' it. So in carbonated drinks for example there are CO2 molecules in the drink, they weren't actually broken down.
Can we live without carbon dioxide? Carbon dioxide or CO2 is an essential part of the cycle of life. Without CO2, plants will die off, and without plants, the earth's biological food chain would be terminally broken. This is an important fact to remember, as carbon dioxide is a vital part of the environment. The human breathing mechanism actual revolves around CO2, not oxygen. Without carbon dioxide, humans wouldn't be able to breathe. We cannot live without carbon dioxide.
Even if it's not your intention, you're spreading climate change denial rhetoric. Every climate scientist understands that co2 is beneficial, in correct proportions. What your argument leaves out is that too much is bad for the environment and negatively effects even some of the things you mentioned. Another issue with your argument is assuming that all co2 would be removed. It is incredibly hard to remove co2, which is the point of the video. You can't accidentally remove too much co2
@@EverythingScience When Joseph Black discovered CO2 he called it 'fixed air' and since then nobody has split the 'carbon' from the 'oxygen'. If it cannot be split it makes one wonder whether it is actually a compound gas. I know one thing for certain, it doesn't contain any carbon!!!
@@PeterPete uhhh it's super easy to seperate the carbon from the oxygen. In a simple way all you would have to do is hit it with some electricity to break the bond. Literally happens in lightning strikes
@@EverythingScience thanks for replying, if you're stating electricity can separate the carbon from the oxygen and it's super easy, have you got a link to a video showing someone doing it? i'll look forward to watching that!!!
Direct air capture is an amazing technology! 94 bucks per ton of CO2, you say? Ok, the total CO2 emission by humankind is >30 billion tons per year. We want to compensate for it, right? Multiplication of the two numbers gives us... Ouch! Almost 3 trillion (yes, that number with twelve zeros!) bucks at the lowest production price! On top of that, how many giga-watt-hours or tera-watt-hours of electricity are needed for this? BTW, to store the fuel produced out of 30 billion tons of CO2 one needs about 20-30 cubic kilometers of underground space. Yes, cubic kilometers, those, you know, cubes one kilometer long, one kilometer wide, and one kilometer high. And those one would need 20 to 30 just to compensate for the global CO2 production at the current level.
They didn't use Mil-spec810G as default rating for "clean energy" so its all not meant to last. Unreliable.. Small modular nuclear reactors delivered around nation fully fueled + Multiple floors of underground glass sealed mirror guided solar heated boilers for non-nuclear heated day power + Flywheels underground to store energy because batteries are nasty + glass sealed light guide vents for peoples homes for no power cost during day for light in dark places + Max smartphone(Estimated 50 million products) = Add all.. *Smartphone houses millions of products that are each produced in thousands of versions by brands at expense of world which is majority of human strain on earth.* - Skynet
What is interest anyone to know that by doing this will cause every plant on planet Earth to die and in turn will eliminate our only source of oxygen... So do I really need to tell you the ultimate results of what we're doing? Or should I ask you how long can you hold your breath?
That's the whole point. The Globalists tell us it's our fault for "climate change" and want us to off ourselves so they can have everything for themselves.
I see it, finally I see the impact we are having its took mass persuasion, consideration and psychedelic sessions, I honestly thought it was a government guilt trip, let's say it is, which I'm not getting at but.. I've only just realised this actually comes from a good place, anyone can contribute for the love of the planet and wellbeing of our future selfs, but most importantly my life has been very narrative and I've being such a nasty person due to mental illness, people probably won't forgive me.. but maybe I can show a gesture to our creator or self unraveling existence... It's a straight modern form of wisdom without any bias....... God bless global warming hope it brings us together before it wipes us out.
The problem is that the amount of co2 is limited on Earth and is sorely needed as plantfood and thus Earth's way to adapt to temperature rises. Co2 is a resource!! By tampering with the co2 amount (other then just planting trees) you can mess everything up. There were periods in Earths history when almost all surface was covered in water and all icecaps were melted (time long before mankind) so there is really not much you can do with the temperature other then--- building a huge shutter between Earth and the sun ;)
We need to cut down some trees in California. If you cut and build house that carbon is forever stored. Letting them burn will release tons of carbon in air
I hate the intro. It's so dumb. You're showing pure water steam billowing out of one of the greenest forms of energy on the planet while talking about CO2 emissions.
When sea water is carbon sink why is it delicating the ecosystems because of high carbon dioxide... Can you plz let me know as I'm preparing for my test..
Not 100% sure I understand what you're asking, but the ocean is good at absorbing CO2. So when we emit a lot of it into the atmosphere the ocean absorbs some of that. That changes the pH of the ocean water (makes ot more acidic). Many species are very sensitive to changes in pH so this change in pH can kill fish and wildlife in the oceans. A very common exampe is how it's destroying coral reefs. (Also, as carbon dioxide is released the world warms and so do the oceans. Some marine species can't survive this warming and so they die.)
Water has more specific heat capacity. Which means, if Carbon dioxide in atmosphere is retaining heat, the carbon dioxide in seawater will also absorb the same level of heating in ocean, while the seawater in which its dissolved in will hold even more heat from the carbondioxide than atmosphere could. Which translates into a physical effect of increasing sea surface temperature raising much faster. CO2 in atmosphere absorbs heat and warms the atmosphere, while CO2 in seawater absorbs the heat and warms the ocean water (which needs more heat for raise in temperature). Apart from that, more CO2 dissolved in water means it will become more acidic and the increasing seawater temperature will lower the level in ocean below which the conditions are alkaline where carbonates precipitate and carbonate shells stay sequestered. That deeper layer is an important player in natural carbon sequestration. The CO2 dissolved in rain water runoff flowing through soil and organic matter, reach ocean and eventually settles into depths where the seawater become highly alkaline and makes the CO2 precipitate with Calcium- Magnesium ions which also came from dissolved soils in rainwater. That is why we have carbonate concretions in deeper ocean floor.
I’m expecting the eventually we’ll see these huge vacuum towers sucking it out of the air in ten years time. They could even convert all that stuff back into fuel.
One problem is it's pretty inefficient energy wise. Potentially they could do it when solar/wind are producing more than can be used/stored. We're actually making a video right now about 5 ways startups are trying to revolutionize how CO2 is pulled out of the air and a lot of those methods I think are more promising.
Or, you know, you can remove government monopoly on money, land and roads, make roads and cities more efficient, make much more subways and trains (that are far more efficient and can run on electricity), separate roads for cars, and new sets of roads exclusively for bikes, velomobiles (extremely energy efficient (human and/or electric), cheap to produce, far more convenient in cities due to taking less parking space, being light enough to park in stack garages)...
There is a lot that goes into what you're suggesting. Just because something runs on electricity, doesn't mean its cleaner. Sure around places that have hydro electric power plants, electric cars makes sense, but where you "burn" for electricity, it is actually worse. As to mass transit, the reason why this may not work is because as of recently, the world has became more dangerous. Especially in big cities, there has been more crime and corruption. I used to take mass transit all the time, but I refuse to do it if it means I may not come home because I appear to have money or white. The "energy" question is far more complex and leaving to politicians is only going to make the problem worse.
@@MavHunter20XX "Electric cars make sense"..? Where on earth have i talked about electric cars? All i've talked about is trains (that are STILL by far more cleaner than cars, even electric cars as its by far the lowest energy consumption mode of travel and cargo transportation, aside velomobiles), and velomobiles, which are NOT electric cars and use 10-20 TIMES less electricity, even less if they use the engine as assist to pedaling, they're almost as fast as a car too. I'll give you the crime argument, but the world has not 'become' more dangerous, in fact in most places crime has been dropping for a while, but politicians (which i brought up) MADE IT more dangerous with their woke bullshit as of late, especially with mass import or third worlders. And idk why are you suggesting politicians would stay out of it if that's EXACTLY WHAT I SAID. But yeah, the so called pollution crisis is just a load of bull because YES, it CAN be solved in the way i mentioned, the problem is no one will let it, politicians which ruin everything (including your crime problem) won't give up their power for anything, and the idiotic brainwashed population that gave them said power will just keep giving them more and caving under, all while thinking it will give them more free shit somehow and solve their ever increasing problems until the inevitable collapse.
@@mongocom1735 Do you support radical taxation on CO2 emissions and radical reductions in CO2 emissions? If so, shouldn't you know the answers to my questions? It appears you are blindly following the technocrats.
@@mongocom1735 Why aren't you an informed voter? I assume you vote for politicians who favor draconian policies regarding CO2, yes? Shouldn't you know what you're voting for?
Yes, but it was a nice visual (also back when we made this video the channel wasn't even monetized so we were a lot more limited in what clips we had the rights to use)
@@joecummings1260 maybe or maybe not. But it wouldn't suck to maybe give it a try also don't be rude please I'm not trying to make people mad I'm just always thinking about how to I'mprove the health of the people And the earth. Let me leave you with a question how do tree's capture carbon and cool down the earth ate the same time? Answer me that question and I might think you atleast know how to think.
@@joecummings1260 also to answer your question it's pretty simplistic carving monoxide has one oxigen atom making it unstable. And carbon dioxide has 2 oxigen atoms making it stable.
@@ragnorockcookie2868 so why are you trying to remove carbon monoxide from the air? Where do you think all this carbon monoxide is going to be coming from in the first place? Carbon monoxide real only happens when there's insufficient combustion air. Carbon monoxide is basically unburnt fuel comet in the modern world using modern machines very few times is carbon monoxide released
Wow, how interesting!!! 😯
Its your video dude..
w-... what? you pinned your own comment about the video you made that... okay...
@@chimedemon Back when I made this video I usually only got ~30 views on a video and no comments. When you have no comments real viewers tend not to want to comment, so I made this comment as a joke just to liven up the comment section in the hopes that more people would drop comments. It's just a joke comment.
I actually have a idea that might be able to help remove carbon monoxide from the air and it's actually a simple and effective way to remove carbon
@@EverythingScience would you like me to explain
Here after Elon Musk offered $100M for the best carbon capture technology to start with my research. Wish me luck.
I'm on to you sir.. That prize will b mine :)
I'm
What is your innovative idea sir?
@@shaikhrizwan9529 🤫
@@akaashanova
I want to know only the base of idea not total technology. I am a inventer of carbon cutter machine N co-founder of P i green innovations. (India). I also have patent in 135 countries. My machine capture carbon from every disel exaust,( it's a retrofit device) But not gas . So any body on same path with good idea together we will make it.
Number 7: calcium carbonate accretion through electrolysis has an incredible ability to pull tones of carbon out of the sea. Furthermore, it could be used to repair existing or to create new reefs. This would create habitats for new marine eco systems to develop, thus removing even more carbon dioxide from the water.
More marine habitats has an added bonus of creating more marine life, thereby helping to feed an ever growing population.
We are experiencing low levels of CO2 in our Earth than almost ever before. Plants thrive under these conditions. They also yield more fruit per square inch under higher CO2 levels. Plants naturally create oxygen and animals and plants live in harmony together. By the way, liquid CO2 is a refrigerant.
I didn't think co2 was ever a liquid thought it went from dryice to gas I guss liquid under pressure could store liquid in deep ocean
If you play paintball, compressed co2 decompressing freezes the paintball gun...
Great presentation! I'd like to see the sources of 'some studies' though.
First of all there are no sources because it was all made up by some politicians back in the '80s and some secret meetings with Congress when they come up with the word global warming that's not real there's no climate change there's nothing wrong with the air until now they're pulling carbon dioxide out of it that's going to kill all the plants that will kill all of us.. and nobody's going to step up to the plate and do anything because the people are so stupid they have no idea of why we're going to die under the certain conditions of plans they have today it will certainly kill everyone of us in a short time and those who have half a brain will say no that's not true cuz the elite would die true with at least not going to die they got fallout shelters 2,000 feet down the biggest military bases that's ever been all tied together with tunnel systems and we're not allowed to be in there we're going to sit up here and suffocate and Dodge hailstones and meteorites when Nemesis comes back around the Sun so it's already too late everything is happening now is irreversible we've already lost two more percent of oxygen in our air we're down to critical now and we've dropped the CO2 levels again to they're almost the bare minimum for plants to live now so I figure about 2 years at the rate we're going now and get everybody to help destroy us that's what everybody's doing right now they're they're leading right up to our own murders and that's I call it murder cuz these people are doing this s*** they know what's going to happen they they took sixth grade science class same as I did that's when we learned how plants make photosynthesis but that's not talking skills today I'm finding out that students aren't taught anything but had a contradict you and b**** at you for not crossing your keys and your eyes cuz they don't know if goddamn thing about science math or history Nice people very easy to make too manipulate...
Of all the emissions and all that inner gas and rare gases in our atmosphere along with all the carbon dioxide in the entire Earth atmosphere consists of 0.98% is all the emissions from burning fossil fuels since the beginning of time and all those super tons and 800 tons and millions of tons of carbon dioxide this m************ c********* in this video said there is as he is a lying son of a b**** cuz every time it rains horses all that back down in the dirt because they told amount entire universe around us everything that we know of the only carbon dioxide that we have is 0.030 of 1%. That's from everything that's all there is and if you cut this number in half all vegetation on planet Earth will water and die as a matter of fact all the Sea algae in the North Atlantic Ocean is dead already from lack of carbon dioxide and it was said that sea allege produce 75% of the oxygen when he breathe and it's showing up in the percentages of air samples as now we have went from 21.9% oxygen in our air down to 20% in the last 4 years if we drop one more half a percent which will be 19.5 the human race will begin to wither and die same as the plants are now that we're going to help everything by taking all the carbs up because it'll help us want it it sure will it helps us right into the God damn grave where the elite wants to be not only have the sheeples turned into battling zombies who are just taking up space for nothing worthless now they have become an instrument of our death and murders
Is there anything stopping us from planting forests on large floating barges?
Even if it doesn't look like it, the online world helps reduce CO2 emissions (as we don't have to physically move from point A to point B).
Well yeah, "Compost carbon content" is tough to say, but just try saying "Creating clever content communicating carbon capturing cultivates climate consciousness" three times fast!
All forests don’t pull CO2 out of the air: old growth can, in fact, be a net CO2 emitter when fungal wood decay returns CO2 back into the air. Regenerating forests do absorb a lot of CO2-but only until they reach their capacity. Managing forests for most efficient CO2 absorption is better than letting forests live to their oldest, pre-decadent state. But once they get old, forests are not as good at storing CO2 as you suggest: old-growth is either not growing very fast (not absorbing CO2) or has become decadent (decay is releasing more CO2 than the stand is absorbing since it’s not really growing much, if at all).
On the whole those old forests would still have absorbed more CO2 over their life time correct? But definitely true we need proper forest management in conjunction with more trees!
Please do not store carbon dioxide and they do not put carbon dioxide into the soil
This is a totally untrue account of the reaction of photosynthesis.. now I'm finding out that science biology and chemistry are not mandate of any school so most students don't volunteer to learn anything about what this man is lying to you about in this video
You are correct -- and we are in a CO2 famine ... ruclips.net/video/RLnQo8l-BHc/видео.html
I'm wondering how long could you survive in a sealed room that has had the CO2 removed from your air supply?
That is why the bible says the earth toiled must rest for 7 years. Give mother earth a chance to rest. Otherwise she will correct herself. Capish
Hello, do you have any suggestions for co2 separation in the wellbore? I'm thinking of removing the co2 down hole before it reaches the surface.
Not a problem neon much and Bill Gates and other billionaires are removing all the carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere as we speak and the results are blatantly showing all over the world as all plants are beginning to die resulting in oxygen levels dropping to critical today and soon you and every person man woman child on planet Earth will suffocate that means you'll be dead you know like in a pine box during the during the Great dirt nap forever... So thank you for your support and volunteering to end your life as all others are doing that is a great joy to people like Bill Gates who has been looking for population control as this is the best way possible as you're doing it yourself for them so they don't even have to be responsible
You are possibly throwing away millions of dollars worth of carbon dioxide is Elon Musk is removing all of it from the atmosphere with machinery and then bottling it up and selling it back to the farmers so their plants don't die pretty good scam don't you think that's better than the gangsters breaking your legs if you won't buy their insurance
CO2 isn't making the oceans more acidic, it's making the ocean less ionic or less basic or less alkaline, but in order to become more acidic it would have to be acidic in the first place, which the oceans are not! When the pH level drops to 6.9, by all means call the oceans acidic, and when it drops to 6.8, by all means say the oceans are becoming more acidic. Average ocean pH level is 8.2 - not acidic at all.
Ditto -- plus we are in a CO2 famine ... ruclips.net/video/RLnQo8l-BHc/видео.html
Becoming less basic is by definition becoming more acidic. It doesn't need to be acidic to become more acidic because it's a sliding log scale. Even at a pH of 11 there is still some acidic characteristic (ie there are hydronium ions)
@@EverythingScience absolutely not. The pH scale is 0 - 14, 7 being neutral: below 7 is acidic. Above 7 is alkaline. Read a book before you comment on things you don't understand. Without Terminology and definition, language loses meaning. Just to clarify, how is it exactly that water with a pH level over 7 can be acidic and alkaline, when it hasn't gone through the neutral stage to even start to become acidic? Alkaline and acidic are opposites, even though that have similar effects, not traits.
@@EverythingScience And that's what you call propaganda -- junk science.
@@robertwitkowski6920This is what little knowledge looks like. Do you know what is the parameter that governs acidity or alkalinity? Do you know what exactly pH means? When you don't understand the exact scientific concept and basis of those, that's when you get this misdirected by the rot understanding of terminology
Politicians: Pay me to reduce Carbon Emissions
Reality: I'm going to use your money to wipe out rain forests and farms for windmills, solarfarms and biofuel farms so I can charge you more for electricity and fuels.
All solutions that does not involving planting more plants sounds like they could have catastrophic results because we're using machines to "pull co2" from the environment. Don't forget, plants live on the stuff.
We're not gonna empty the atmosphere 😂 just take out the extra we put in.
If take it all out we're gonna freeze.
Today im seeing co2 levels reported at 0.03% carbon dioxide ..at this low level plants suffer and starve to death ..trees and plants are dieing ...the oxygen level is dropping fast to now 20% as dieing and dead plants do not produce oxygen as well as live plants ..if our oxygen level drop to 19.5% ..people will begin dropping dead ..we are loosing oxygen at a rate of 1% in six months ..at this rate we have about 90 left to live . Then we are dead from suffocation ..due to the co2 removal that will kill every living organism on earth to a complete extinction of all life on earth ..
I think maybe we could turn every air conditioner into a CO2 scrubber and perhaps the C02 that was captured could maybe even be used to fertilize soil.
AC units move a lot of sit and this seems like a no-brainer.
Just make sure it stays above the limit when plants cannot breath any longer. CO2 is the source of carbon for all life on earth. H2O is the source of hydrogen. We had CO2 5 times as much as now a long time ago when life was flourishing on planet earth. Do not destroy it.
Well im pretty sure all the individuals that will be dying or suffering heat exhaustion tomorrow and Tuesday in england because of climate change arent gonna care much about that🤷♀️
@@Violet._.PhoeniX people in England fall out when its 70 degrees outside 🤣. Weak af
Sir please tell me which solution is use in direct capture co2 from air please.....
Here we go again: 0:01 Why do so many people still insist on illustrating CO2 emissions or other pollutants by showing cooling towers whose only emission is clouds of water droplets. FYI Even nuclear power stations have cooling towers. Just makes me question the intelligence and knowledge of the presenter / content provider If they can’t tell the difference between H20 and CO2.
Unofrutnaltey when this video was made the channel was very small and wasn't monetized and we were very limited in what video clips we had permissions to use.
Those nuclear power plant stacks produce water vapor. Water vapor is more conducive to trapping heat than co2 ,the nuclear power plant cooling tunnels discharge heated water into the oceans , heating the surrounding waters
Very innovative and inspiring. Thanx a ton .
I can't see the merit of planting trees as a strategy. Can someone help me understand?
we need to quadruple our atmospheric CO2 if we ever expect the planet to heal...
what...
Agreed
Can’t they extract the CO2 at a certain extend and store and release where needed ?
If he didn’t have that little caption about the plural of fish almost everyone in the comments would’ve said “fish!”😂
I beleive that discs with holes in them passing electricity could convert co2 in the atmosphere into water and sugar. But thats just what I know so far about it. It would have to be just before the ozone layer to remove the amount trapped there
How many ways to reduce oxygen consumption, and exchange heat exausted from energy creation source's.
How much of that CO2 has been absorbed by plants? 99%?
How much hexen chamical use in this
Thanks for the information
The Earth is 4.6 Billion years old. I doubt it needs privilege people trying to micro manage it to feel better about themselves. They should show us how much they care by planting trees, or inventing new technology. Im one of those people that looks at actions not words which usually ticks off the people with only words. lol
Great points - plus we are in a CO2 famine ... ruclips.net/video/RLnQo8l-BHc/видео.html
Y'all do realise the gas fumes you see coming out of a nuclear reactor chimney is actually 'steam' !!
yep, I addressed this in other comments but back when this video was made we were so small and you need to license footage so we just didn't have the money to access a wide variety of visual clips.
‘’1.5 Million Tons per year’’ apart from the fact that mass monoculture Trees would be needed that are replacing & destroying Ecosystems, and at the moment many old growth forests are being burned in these Biomass power stations. The CO2 captured is only a fraction of the CO2 emissions released in transportation, pellet making, loss of Wild Forest Land etc. The ‘’1.5 Million Tons’’ is minuscule compared to what is needed and what could be sequestered just by using Algae to clean out waste water, which would permanently sequester approx 364 Million Tons p/a, with no need for the deep drilling to pressure CO2 into rock, which is more energy needed for that. The Biomass & Bio Oil from Algae is valuable as it can be made into numerous Carbon Neg/Eco Friendly products including Clean Burning Carbon Neg Bio Fuel, 1 Ton of Atmospheric CO2 permanently sequestered from every Barrel of Algae Oil.
This is very good information for future planning to climate change
1. Stop breathing.
2-7 will take care of themselves and mostly a waste of energy and resources.
See how easy that was.
*Thanos has entered the chat*
@@EverythingScience You Can't Handle The Truth.
I came here looking for a way to refill compressed CO2 tanks at home. I really liked it anyway though.
great info
Why don't they just separate Carbon and Oxygen from it. It gives us solid carbon (which is used for many purposes) and oxygen gas
Im glad that there's someone who care about climate change :)
Future be like: The earth is dying because we are running out of co2. Because of that, trees and photosynthesis bacteria is dying....
What is photosynthesis bacteria?
Photosynthesis is a process used to convert carbon dioxide and water to glucose and oxygen powered with solar energy and performed by chlorophyll. To my information, some bacteria use photosynthesis as a method pf gaining energy, as well as some plants and animals. But which one bacteria are you talking about? And wouldn’t it be much more important to care about all plants instead of just some species of bacteria?
The industry puts out CO2? We just got a CO2 level monitor in our small (rambler) house and were stunned how much humans output, just with two of us we have to open windows twice a day to keep the indoor air just at 'moderate' level. Worry about outside air when indoor air is 3-5 times worse? Global CO2 levels from the 1500s to today increased from around 280 to 410. In our house at the end of the day we measured over 1500 (!), this is when staying indoor all day and we know it's just us because when we are not home the levels actually go down - and we even have ceiling fans running all day all night circulating the air. Then we did some research and found that unventilated student dorm rooms averaged over 2000. More than 20% of school classrooms checked in Texas exceeded 3000 at the end of class! Check your CO2 levels indoor FIRST and make sure that is healthy.
Why don't you have more subscribers this is good content much better than that Morgz & Paul crap
We all gotta start small 😅. But we've also been growing really fast lately. Last month we were under 500 subs and it looks like we may cross 1k today! Thank you for the support, it really means a lot to us smaller channels.
can we not do something on the lines of fractional distillation on liquid air to separate carbon dioxide
That sounds like it would just be too energy intensive (especially compared to existing technologies). Between cooling air to get it into a liquid state then heating it back up to distill. Also, I don't think fractional distillation would work on something that is a gas at room temperature. Since in distillation you heat a liquid mixture and one part separates out into a gas then naturally condenses back down. The only way to have that maybe work is after the CO2 evaporates to then re-cool it to collect it, but then that's even more energy intensive, and what do you do with the frozen CO2. Keep it frozen forever? But I like the idea!
@@EverythingScience keeping the CO2 frozen is persistent money consuming process
This is a tutorial on how to make infinite soda
Yeah we need soda, the only soda that i can buy is from Bashkiria Russia where there was protests against digging their Kushtau mountain for soda production
We should replace farms with forest food
We wouldn’t have enough food then
@@Ajprazzy7137 At least you know what it means a food forest?
We aren't removing sh!t... Join Extinction Rebellion. #FridaysForFuture.
20 million, 200 million, 1 trillion.
The one technology I don't care for would be Fe fertilisation of the ocean. This is because it facilitate nitrogen & phosphorus activity----to the point of eutrophication which is not pretty.
Don’t plants breath carbon dioxide? Didn’t the Pleistocene period have ten times the amount of CO2 in the air then we do now? This was the most plant abundant period in earths history so then why do we not want more CO2 in the air? Wouldn’t this help to green the planet?
Wait if boats can use carbon as fuel than re-release it into the air, why not just capture that to reuse as fuel?
Now we have balloons with boxes strapped to them
They still don't understand that environment is the real money
If we can find a way to undo the damage we've done on a steadily growing mass scale, then even if there are major holdouts that refuse to move on from fossil fuels, we'd be okay. This could be a good way to tackle the political messaging, since given how politicised climate action has become, many will refuse to move on from coal just because it's coal, even if renewable sources turn out to be more efficient and cheap as well as renewable.
Great information 🙏🙇
Wait hol up water dissolves carbon dioxide in milliseconds so how does it stay there
I don't think I'm understanding your question. When water 'dissolves' CO2 it's not breaking it apart, it's just 'absorbing' it. So in carbonated drinks for example there are CO2 molecules in the drink, they weren't actually broken down.
Reducing CO2 is anti-green.. Not sure why these "smart" people do not understand this..
We could plant trees on every square inch of this planet where possible and it still wouldn't be enough. Plant trees, but keep finding other ways.
Can we live without carbon dioxide?
Carbon dioxide or CO2 is an essential part of the cycle of life. Without CO2, plants will die off, and without plants, the earth's biological food chain would be terminally broken. This is an important fact to remember, as carbon dioxide is a vital part of the environment. The human breathing mechanism actual revolves around CO2, not oxygen. Without carbon dioxide, humans wouldn't be able to breathe. We cannot live without carbon dioxide.
Even if it's not your intention, you're spreading climate change denial rhetoric. Every climate scientist understands that co2 is beneficial, in correct proportions. What your argument leaves out is that too much is bad for the environment and negatively effects even some of the things you mentioned. Another issue with your argument is assuming that all co2 would be removed. It is incredibly hard to remove co2, which is the point of the video. You can't accidentally remove too much co2
Tell Elon Musk to bring me my money.
He'll probably just pay it out in dodgecoin 😂
Live stock is the main reason
The power plants in the beginning of your video are nuclear. That is not CO2 you're seeing. That is steam. It's H20
Alot of coal plants have the same cooling towers
Dear Everything Science. I wrote this poem, so here it goes.
For Johnny is no more
What he thought was H2O
for H2SO4!
End Scene.
First you need to divide it by 2 to make it CO1, then just remove the C
How about we just remove the C, don't even need to divide it by 2 first. Decreased the steps 50% and now we have some good clean O2 to breathe in!
@@EverythingScience When Joseph Black discovered CO2 he called it 'fixed air' and since then nobody has split the 'carbon' from the 'oxygen'. If it cannot be split it makes one wonder whether it is actually a compound gas. I know one thing for certain, it doesn't contain any carbon!!!
@@PeterPete uhhh it's super easy to seperate the carbon from the oxygen. In a simple way all you would have to do is hit it with some electricity to break the bond. Literally happens in lightning strikes
@@EverythingScience thanks for replying, if you're stating electricity can separate the carbon from the oxygen and it's super easy, have you got a link to a video showing someone doing it? i'll look forward to watching that!!!
@@PeterPete I mean it's basic chemistry. Energy can break bonds
Direct air capture is an amazing technology! 94 bucks per ton of CO2, you say? Ok, the total CO2 emission by humankind is >30 billion tons per year. We want to compensate for it, right? Multiplication of the two numbers gives us... Ouch! Almost 3 trillion (yes, that number with twelve zeros!) bucks at the lowest production price! On top of that, how many giga-watt-hours or tera-watt-hours of electricity are needed for this? BTW, to store the fuel produced out of 30 billion tons of CO2 one needs about 20-30 cubic kilometers of underground space. Yes, cubic kilometers, those, you know, cubes one kilometer long, one kilometer wide, and one kilometer high. And those one would need 20 to 30 just to compensate for the global CO2 production at the current level.
They didn't use Mil-spec810G as default rating for "clean energy" so its all not meant to last. Unreliable.. Small modular nuclear reactors delivered around nation fully fueled + Multiple floors of underground glass sealed mirror guided solar heated boilers for non-nuclear heated day power + Flywheels underground to store energy because batteries are nasty + glass sealed light guide vents for peoples homes for no power cost during day for light in dark places + Max smartphone(Estimated 50 million products) = Add all..
*Smartphone houses millions of products that are each produced in thousands of versions by brands at expense of world which is majority of human strain on earth.* - Skynet
How about we consume less and import less?
I read somewhere that great whales could help reduce CO2 from the atmosphere.
This is true! I was thinking about making a part 2 to this video since a lot of people liked it and was going to talk about whales for a little bit!
What is interest anyone to know that by doing this will cause every plant on planet Earth to die and in turn will eliminate our only source of oxygen... So do I really need to tell you the ultimate results of what we're doing? Or should I ask you how long can you hold your breath?
That's the whole point. The Globalists tell us it's our fault for "climate change" and want us to off ourselves so they can have everything for themselves.
BECCS is crap, we have 10 years.. we need 30.
Plants inhale CO2 exhale Oxygen.
I see it, finally I see the impact we are having its took mass persuasion, consideration and psychedelic sessions, I honestly thought it was a government guilt trip, let's say it is, which I'm not getting at but.. I've only just realised this actually comes from a good place, anyone can contribute for the love of the planet and wellbeing of our future selfs, but most importantly my life has been very narrative and I've being such a nasty person due to mental illness, people probably won't forgive me.. but maybe I can show a gesture to our creator or self unraveling existence... It's a straight modern form of wisdom without any bias....... God bless global warming hope it brings us together before it wipes us out.
The problem is that the amount of co2 is limited on Earth and is sorely needed as plantfood and thus Earth's way to adapt to temperature rises. Co2 is a resource!! By tampering with the co2 amount (other then just planting trees) you can mess everything up. There were periods in Earths history when almost all surface was covered in water and all icecaps were melted (time long before mankind) so there is really not much you can do with the temperature other then--- building a huge shutter between Earth and the sun ;)
STOP BREATHING…… I wanna know this persons carbon footprint from just simply talking for 8 minutes
We need to cut down some trees in California. If you cut and build house that carbon is forever stored. Letting them burn will release tons of carbon in air
I hate the intro. It's so dumb. You're showing pure water steam billowing out of one of the greenest forms of energy on the planet while talking about CO2 emissions.
Elon musk 🙂🙂
Praise be Elon for all the extra views this month 🙏🙏🙏
When sea water is carbon sink why is it delicating the ecosystems because of high carbon dioxide... Can you plz let me know as I'm preparing for my test..
Not 100% sure I understand what you're asking, but the ocean is good at absorbing CO2. So when we emit a lot of it into the atmosphere the ocean absorbs some of that. That changes the pH of the ocean water (makes ot more acidic). Many species are very sensitive to changes in pH so this change in pH can kill fish and wildlife in the oceans. A very common exampe is how it's destroying coral reefs. (Also, as carbon dioxide is released the world warms and so do the oceans. Some marine species can't survive this warming and so they die.)
@@EverythingScience how are you so goddamn smart
Water has more specific heat capacity. Which means, if Carbon dioxide in atmosphere is retaining heat, the carbon dioxide in seawater will also absorb the same level of heating in ocean, while the seawater in which its dissolved in will hold even more heat from the carbondioxide than atmosphere could. Which translates into a physical effect of increasing sea surface temperature raising much faster. CO2 in atmosphere absorbs heat and warms the atmosphere, while CO2 in seawater absorbs the heat and warms the ocean water (which needs more heat for raise in temperature). Apart from that, more CO2 dissolved in water means it will become more acidic and the increasing seawater temperature will lower the level in ocean below which the conditions are alkaline where carbonates precipitate and carbonate shells stay sequestered. That deeper layer is an important player in natural carbon sequestration. The CO2 dissolved in rain water runoff flowing through soil and organic matter, reach ocean and eventually settles into depths where the seawater become highly alkaline and makes the CO2 precipitate with Calcium- Magnesium ions which also came from dissolved soils in rainwater. That is why we have carbonate concretions in deeper ocean floor.
Biomass plants are a bad idea, burning trees is just deforestation. Going entire against the planting of trees.
Can we all just take a minute to realize politicians and businesses took this seriously since the 60s things might be a little different?
Wow! Mr Beast is on the video!
Sounds a bit funky, but really interesting otherwise 👍👊
Already donated to the #teamtree 👍
When the trees are cut down they will just release it all back into the world
Sounds like we should start planting more trees then 🙂
@@EverythingScience no, when a tree dies it releases the co2 that it collected throughout its life
Moss. Moss is much more effective than trees at sucking up co2
Proud of my CO2 footprint; my gardens LOVE it!
I’m expecting the eventually we’ll see these huge vacuum towers sucking it out of the air in ten years time. They could even convert all that stuff back into fuel.
One problem is it's pretty inefficient energy wise. Potentially they could do it when solar/wind are producing more than can be used/stored. We're actually making a video right now about 5 ways startups are trying to revolutionize how CO2 is pulled out of the air and a lot of those methods I think are more promising.
Just build a ionizing machine shaped like a mushroom into the clouds. DONE no more carbon dioxide.
Elon Musk offering $100M time to go back to school.
Or, you know, you can remove government monopoly on money, land and roads, make roads and cities more efficient, make much more subways and trains (that are far more efficient and can run on electricity), separate roads for cars, and new sets of roads exclusively for bikes, velomobiles (extremely energy efficient (human and/or electric), cheap to produce, far more convenient in cities due to taking less parking space, being light enough to park in stack garages)...
There is a lot that goes into what you're suggesting. Just because something runs on electricity, doesn't mean its cleaner. Sure around places that have hydro electric power plants, electric cars makes sense, but where you "burn" for electricity, it is actually worse.
As to mass transit, the reason why this may not work is because as of recently, the world has became more dangerous. Especially in big cities, there has been more crime and corruption. I used to take mass transit all the time, but I refuse to do it if it means I may not come home because I appear to have money or white.
The "energy" question is far more complex and leaving to politicians is only going to make the problem worse.
@@MavHunter20XX "Electric cars make sense"..? Where on earth have i talked about electric cars? All i've talked about is trains (that are STILL by far more cleaner than cars, even electric cars as its by far the lowest energy consumption mode of travel and cargo transportation, aside velomobiles), and velomobiles, which are NOT electric cars and use 10-20 TIMES less electricity, even less if they use the engine as assist to pedaling, they're almost as fast as a car too.
I'll give you the crime argument, but the world has not 'become' more dangerous, in fact in most places crime has been dropping for a while, but politicians (which i brought up) MADE IT more dangerous with their woke bullshit as of late, especially with mass import or third worlders. And idk why are you suggesting politicians would stay out of it if that's EXACTLY WHAT I SAID. But yeah, the so called pollution crisis is just a load of bull because YES, it CAN be solved in the way i mentioned, the problem is no one will let it, politicians which ruin everything (including your crime problem) won't give up their power for anything, and the idiotic brainwashed population that gave them said power will just keep giving them more and caving under, all while thinking it will give them more free shit somehow and solve their ever increasing problems until the inevitable collapse.
Why? Globalization? Wtf is global warming?
Co2 can be eliminated. Something enviro-natzees never say.
Why would we want to remove CO2 from the atmosphere?
have you heard of venus atmosphere? no one wants to have something similar.
@@mongocom1735
If the human portion of CO2 was removed from the atmosphere, what would the CO2 ppm be and how much would the temperature drop?
@@ThekiBoran pretty sure you can go to any university that researches climate change and learn more about that there
@@mongocom1735
Do you support radical taxation on CO2 emissions and radical reductions in CO2 emissions? If so, shouldn't you know the answers to my questions? It appears you are blindly following the technocrats.
@@mongocom1735
Why aren't you an informed voter? I assume you vote for politicians who favor draconian policies regarding CO2, yes? Shouldn't you know what you're voting for?
If you are looking for away to help the environment you can use ecosia they are a search engine that plants trees
Cool i can learn how co2 comes out 😁
Isn't that just steam coming from the power plant?
Yes, but it was a nice visual (also back when we made this video the channel wasn't even monetized so we were a lot more limited in what clips we had the rights to use)
Have less people so insentivise people to have less kids😂
Build big scrubber machine, sand , water and gravity is the key .
Who’s here after the tweet of Elon!?
I actually have an idea to decrease carbon monoxide from from the air
Being that you don't know the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, I'm betting your idea is total crap
@@joecummings1260 maybe or maybe not. But it wouldn't suck to maybe give it a try also don't be rude please I'm not trying to make people mad I'm just always thinking about how to I'mprove the health of the people And the earth. Let me leave you with a question how do tree's capture carbon and cool down the earth ate the same time? Answer me that question and I might think you atleast know how to think.
@@joecummings1260 also to answer your question it's pretty simplistic carving monoxide has one oxigen atom making it unstable. And carbon dioxide has 2 oxigen atoms making it stable.
@@ragnorockcookie2868 so why are you trying to remove carbon monoxide from the air? Where do you think all this carbon monoxide is going to be coming from in the first place? Carbon monoxide real only happens when there's insufficient combustion air. Carbon monoxide is basically unburnt fuel comet in the modern world using modern machines very few times is carbon monoxide released
@@joecummings1260 yahh i know. But when I wrote that I didn't know the difference
999 likes, awesome video. +1 so you have 1k
a true hero
Releasing volcanic ash in the atmosphere it done it before
additives, or oxidize it,Nemo filters.